Archives for the month of: November, 2021

‘Deutschland Uber Alles’

Čitajte na srpskom

Liberal Democracy in Europe

Nazi party membership in Germany was about 10% and yet not only were the German people controlled by and motivated to supporting fascism, this 10% led an aggressive imperialism to point of imposing will on their neighbors. With the European Union dominated by today’s Germany, there is a rather shocking comparison when we examine the ‘grand coalition’ of Angela Merkel’s expired political deal:

Rough party membership math:

Social Democrats 420,000
Christian Democrats 406,000
Christian Social Union 140,000

Total ‘grand coalition’ party members had been about 966,000, which applied as a percentage of approximately 60,000,000 (sixty million) eligible voters in Germany equals 1.6% (one point six percent) party members or less than 2% of Germans were making and driving policy for 60,000,000 (sixty million) German voters.

The new ‘traffic light’ coalition using the 2019 statistics (they won’t have changed radically)

Party membership:

Social Democrats 420,000
Greens 97,000
Free Democrats 66,000

Total party membership 583,000

Total voters 60,000,000

Or in the 21st Century ‘liberal democracy’ Germany, in its dominate position within the EU, the new coalition determines about 1% of Germans will enforce the ideology, policies and direction that not only Germany, but all of the European Union (and more) will be subjected to.

400,000,000 (four hundred million) European Union voters having policy made for them by the new German ‘traffic light’ coalition = 0.145% (not even two tenths of one percent), deciding the direction and fate of approximately one half of Europe. But it is more than that. It is as well about the European Union expansion, a de facto German imperialism imposing its will much more effectively that the Nazis had, with so-called soft power, normally enhanced-enforced on the dark side (blackmail, assassinations) by the relevant intelligence agencies:

Soft power

Soft power in politics (particularly in international politics), is the manipulation or operation of a reward and punishment system in the absence of (obvious) physical violence. Soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal, attraction and (covert) threats or unpleasant consequences. The currency of soft power includes culture, political values, attraction and rewards

The new boss of the German soft power imperial project:

Olaf Scholz

Since his attendance at the 2010 Bilderberg as mayor in Hamburg, Scholz’ career has experienced a Bilderberg boost, advancing to the Social Democrats’ 2020 candidate for German Chancellor at the 2021 German parliamentary election

✓ supports a ‘sovereign’ European Union

In the new German ‘traffic light’ coalition it is the ‘green light’ will run the foreign policy. New foreign minister Annalena Baerbock (a naif ripe for manipulation by Bundesnachrichtendienst intelligence briefings) brings an Atlanticist orientation that is second to none when it comes to an Anglo-American trained German imperialist:

Annalena Baerbock

Annalena Baerbock was selected as the Green Party candidate for Chancellor in the 2021 German parliamentary election, when the Alliance 90/The Greens achieved their best ever result at 14.8% of the votes, winning 118 seats, and coming third behind the SPD (206 seats) and the CDU/CSU (196 seats)…

✓ supports the eastward expansion of NATO

✓ supports a more aggressive European Union foreign policy

Then, we have a ‘green’ nobody novelist-provincial politician becomes vice-chancellor, basically he is assigned a role of lobby for the green party line in formulating policy at the chancellery:

Robert Habeck

Robert Habeck is a German writer and politician. He has served as co-leader of Alliance ’90/The Greens since 2018 alongside Annalena Baerbock. Habeck passed his final secondary-school examinations in 1989 at the Heinrich …

✓ supports the neonazi regime in Kiev

But it is this guy holding the Ministry of Agriculture that people had better watch out for, because his behind closed doors role & influence will certainly be out-sized in the ongoing 21st Century’s German imperialism project when it comes the Greens holding the foreign ministry:

Cem Özdemir

Cem Özdemir is a German politician of the German political party Alliance 90/The Greens. He is of part of the carefully nurtured party fraction that brought The Greens from a pacifist party to a strongly militaristic (‘olive green’) stance, stating that “we Greens have lost our fear of departments that deal with security issues”

✓ founding member, European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR)

Recalling the present ‘liberal democracy’ iteration of German imperialism arrives on the scene at Strasbourg & Brussels with less than two tenths of one percent of the European electorate (Germany’s policy making front or the traffic light coalition determining future EU policy) the ‘green light’ also holds the right to appoint Germany’s next member (when von der Leyen’s term is expired) to the European Commission and it should be a no-brainer to assume this would be the European Union’s ‘green’ Special Rapporteur to the Western Balkans, the impeccably German imperialist who is on record stating “The Western Balkans is not our neighborhood, it is our inner-yard” … with a résumé which profiles as having Bundesnachrichtendienst asset (German CIA) written all over it:

Viola von Cramon

In August 2018, von Cramon announced that she would run for a parliamentary seat in the 2019 European elections. Since becoming a Member of the European Parliament, she has been serving on the Committee on Foreign Affairs. In this capacity, she is the Parliament’s rapporteur on relations to the Western Balkans. In 2020, she also joined the Special Committee on Foreign Interference in all Democratic Processes in the European Union

✓ opposes the right of self determination of peoples

✓ sleeps with Zelensky’s warmongers in Kiev

✓ furthers the ongoing NATO encirclement of Russia

In circumstance of ‘liberal democracy’ where in the European Union, less than two tenths of one percent make and drive policy, there must be factored in the additional structural phenomenon; the 583,000 Germans having captured the 400,000,000 voting EU citizens doesn’t change the nature of the hierarchy wherein it will be a handful of the 583,000 at the top, with lateral associations (intelligence agencies, corporate lobbies), will determine direction. Just one more unfortunate equation.

21st Century Imperial Germany’s Bundesnachrichtendienst ‘soft power’ project not only has played the Kremlin a fool in the ‘chancellor to president’ presumably peer-to-peer relationship, but moreover, in the trans-Atlantic dealings, Germany makes today’s USA look like the handicapped IQ, thug-enforcer-bodyguard it actually has become; a thick-skulled goon basking in a self important delusion of grandeur when manipulated on a world stage play strategized & energized by a thinly concealed central European imperial meme laundering its’ agenda.

People should stop a misdirected obsessing with the Americans and start examining the Germans.

A postscript would be, in this case where a short research determines the ‘pacifist’ aspirations are contradicted by the militarist associations and actions, I really would prefer there were some intelligent, ecosystem preserving policies and relevant laws with teeth. But I certainly wouldn’t welcome the 21st Century German imperialism into my parlor; to go about discussion in regards to arriving at positive outcomes in the case where an imperial German ‘liberal democracy’ determines the reality of ‘green’ refers to a case of gangrene as much as anything.

Related: Education & Espionage

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

A Sociopaths & Democracy Project

*

ganesh

Tales of a 1984 Journey to India

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 1 From Indian country to India

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 2 New Delhi, round one

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 3 On character

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 4 Into the Himalayan foothills

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 5 Sanarth & the Buddha

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 6 Varanasi part one

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 7 Varanasi part two

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 8 Varanasi part three

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 9 Katmandu

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 10 Trisuli River

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 11 Chitwan National Park

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 12 Katmandu reprise

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 13 Back to Hotel Imperial

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 14 The riots begin

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 15 To the Taj Palace Hotel

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 16 Out of Delhi!

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 17 Cairo-London-New York

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 18 Aftermath

My Madcap Adventure, Epilogue (Notes) corrections/disclaimers

By Russell Bentley

I recently received the following email under the title – Media Request – comment for upcoming article

Russell, hello,

I’m a journalist for BuzzFeed News. I reported extensively in the Donbass during the war, although I’m not sure our paths crossed. But I believe we know each other. I’m writing to ask if you’d like to comment on a piece of information I’ll be including in an upcoming story. The story is not focused on you. However, in the course of my reporting I learned that you are one of the 250 people the Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s Office is investigating for alleged terrorism-related offenses for fighting on the Russia-backed side of the war. Because I’ll be mentioning this in the article, I wanted to contact you to give you a chance to respond. Please let me know today if you’d like to comment on this matter. In describing you in the article, I’ll also mention your past drug conviction, as well as your time fighting in Donetsk.

Thank you,
Chris Miller

There’s no need to include here my insolent, insulting and profanity-laced reply, (perhaps Miller will be so kind as to publish it elsewhere, though he failed to do so, or even mention me at all in his article) but suffice to say, I compared the Ukraine Prosecutor General’s Office to a cesspool, and specifically called Miller a “presstitute”. That neo-nazi terrorists in the Prosecutor General’s Office are investigating me for “terrorism” because I have defended the citizens and civilians of Donbass from Kiev’s own genocide and ethnic cleansing programs is the the apex of hypocrisy and cynicism, a real life example of the comic book “Bizarro World” where everything is the exact opposite of what it is supposed to be. Equally as “bizarro” and hypocritical is Miller’s calling himself a “journalist”. He is a US government paid professional propagandist and disinformation specialist , an enemy of the truth and an inveterate liar. As for my “past drug conviction”, well, there is some truth to that, and I’ll address it, since Miller didn’t, but let’s take each in their turn. First, the Ukrainian Prosecutor General, and the abject ukrop quisling government as a whole. [1]

A quick Google search for “Ukraine corruption” brings up almost 46 million results. It has been ranked the ninth most corrupt country in the world, the most corrupt in Europe, and Ukraine’s corruption rank by country has averaged 117th over the past 22 years, which is, in fact, exactly where it is today, according to tradingeconomics.com, an international business and investment news service with no political ax to grind. So, despite occasional fluctuations and purely cosmetic rhetoric, for more than two decades, including the past eight years under direct and complete US/NATO/IMF suzerainty, the word “Ukraine”, as well as the nation itself, remains synonymous with “corruption”. Same as it ever was. And how could it be otherwise? [2], [3]

Since the Maidan “Revolution of Dignity” instigated by the political treachery of the EU reneging on a last minute treaty with then President Yanukovich, and cemented with the mass murder of over 100 police and protesters by “unknown assailants”, (crimes which remain unsolved by the brilliant sleuths of the General Prosecutors Office, in spite of compelling forensic, video, and eyewitness evidence, and even outright confessions by some of the snipers themselves) Ukraine has been run by a collection of neo-nazis and mafia billionaires, under the command of Gauleiter Joe Biden. [4], [5], [6], [7]

Biden assumed control of Ukraine, soon after the Maidan coup, with his State Department flunkies Geoffery Pyatt and Victoria “Nuland” Nudelman hand-picking the next president , Prime Minister and their entire administrations, right down to appointing Vitali Klitchko as Mayor of Kiev (which he still is to this day). This parade of kleptocrats and clowns included Petro Poroshenko, an alcoholic billionaire and ruthless gangster as the new President of Ukraine, and Mikael Sakashvili, the fugitive ex-President of Georgia, who was appointed Governor of the Odessa region, in spite of being wanted at the time in his former country for corruption charges involving assault and murder in Georgia (charges for which he was subsequently convicted and sentenced to six years in prison, a sentence which he is currently serving in Georgia.) This motley crew is hardly the type to inspire trust and confidence that justice will be served, and distrust for the justice system in Ukraine is widespread. In fact, Ukraine ranked 101 out of 109 countries in the 2017 Index of Public Integrity. Opinion polls taken in 2016, two years after the new puppet regime was installed, recorded that only 3 to 5 percent of the population had any trust in the country’s justice system. And small wonder… Is this a face you would trust? [8], [9], [10], [11]

Ukrainian Prosecutor General Irina Venediktova She has ways of making you talk…

As for the Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s Office in particular, headed by the hatchet-faced Inquisitor Irina Venediktova, which is according to Miller, busy “investigating” 250 members of the Donbass Defense Forces (including myself) it has so far failed to identify, investigate, indict, prosecute or convict anyone in the Kiev sniper mass murders, the Odessa Trade Union mass murders, the MH-17 false flag mass murders, the theft of at least $4 billion of US and IMF aid, or the Burisma Oil scandal involving Hunter Biden, nor for the war crimes committed by at least seven US neo-nazis who served in Ukrainian military units that are currently being investigated by the FBI.

Those war crimes, committed by pro-Kiev US neo-nazis, involving multiple cases of kidnapping, rape, torture and murder of Ukrainian civilians, have been investigated since at least 2018, not by Ukrainian authorities, but by the US FBI. In fact, the main suspect in the case, Craig Lang, who is also wanted for a a double murder of an elderly couple in Florida, USA in April, 2018, has so far been protected from justice and harbored in Kiev by the Ukrainian government itself, including specifically the Prosecutor General’s Office. It is a fact that the SBU, the Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ukrainian military are themselves all well known for kidnapping, torture and murder, so it is not far fetched to consider the possibility that Prosecutor Venediktova (who is also a sitting member of the National Security and Defense Council, which controls all the above organizations) is dragging her feet on bringing Lang and other war criminals to justice because she doesn’t consider kidnapping, torture and murder to be “crimes”, when applied by her colleagues and minions to the kind of people she thinks “deserve” it. And I guarantee, in her opinion, and Lang’s, I’d be exactly that kind of person.

A photo that neo-nazi Craig Lang once sent to me personally, on Facebook.

In their eyes, and apparently in Chris Miller’s, I and all who have defended the Russian people of Donbass from genocide and ethnic cleansing operations are “terrorists”. I did serve for about a year total in the DPR military and police, but I never went on a single offensive combat operation. I was, once, on a recon mission behind enemy lines, but we did not make contact, and no shots were fired. Every single shot I have ever fired in this war has been in self-defense, in a defensive position, shooting at soldiers, mercenaries and neo-nazi volunteers like Lang, who were attacking our position and shooting directly at me and my comrades. The German nazis called Russian Partizans and European Resistance fighters “terrorists” too, and these torturers, killers and war criminals of the current Kiev regime are no different or better than their nazi forebearers. It is an honor for me that these blood-thirsty beasts know I am their enemy and are terrified of it. As well they should be. Ukraine will soon be liberated, and then it will be scum like Venediktova who will be prosecuted and punished for their crimes, and I hope I live long enough to see it. I don’t want to see them tortured or killed, I just want justice done. I want to see them brought to Donbass in work battalions to repair and rebuild every single thing broken or destroyed by their attacks on the peaceful people of Donbass, ordered by the likes Venediktova, and carried out by mad dogs like Lang. There are two kinds of people in this world, those who build, and those who destroy. By bringing those who destroyed Donbass here to rebuild it, perhaps we can rehabilitate them. One thing is certain – by the time they finish re-building every single thing they have destroyed here, they will be very different people than the vermin they are today.

CHRIS MILLER – PSEUDO-JOURNALIST, PROFESSIONAL PROPAGANDIST AND NEO-NAZI FANBOY

Chris Miller introduced himself to me with a lie. “I’m a journalist for Buzzfeed News.” This is exactly the kind of lie he and his ilk of highly trained disinfo specialists are expert at – using what appears to be the truth to tell a lie. Yes, Miller’s articles do appear on the Buzzfeed News page, and he probably does get a check from them every month, but if you know his backstory, like I do, you know that his fealty is to whatever the owners of the US government tell him it is.

Chris Miller, jive-ass hipster bullshit artist, posing as a “journalist”.

Buzzfeed passes itself off to young, ignorant and impressionable naifs as a cool, progressive, alternative media “news” source, while being in fact a gossip rag and soap opera digest which is the draw and the cover for the occasional political disinfo story that is their real raison d’etre. Buzzfeed is a product of the Democratic Party Deep State, having been the first and main publisher of the “Steele Dossier”, a bogus hitpiece against Trump, later debunked by myriad sources, including most of the US mainstream media itself. With their penchance for plaigarism, fake news and stupid stunts, it is small wonder that in a 2017 survey among US readers by The Guardian (UK), BuzzFeed was voted the second least trustworthy source among American readers, with only “Occupy Democrats” being lower-ranked. “Yes,” you might say, “but Buzzfeed won the Pulitzer Prize for international reporting in 2021.” Indeed, which is every bit as appropriate as war criminals Henry Kissinger and Barrack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize. In other words, a tragic joke and a disgrace, and the apex of hypocrisy. [12]

Buzzfeed is also a pioneer of “advertorial” advertising, an insidious mixing of advertising and “information/news” content that is almost subliminal, and is primarily of interest to major corporations as opposed to smaller or local businesses. The potential for the political abuse of such type of “advertising” is obvious. Which brings us to Miller’s previous, most interesting and most important employer – the CIA. Well, Radio Free Europe, (RFE) which was founded by the National Committee for a Free Europe, an anti-communist CIA front organization that was formed by Allen Dulles in 1949. Dulles later became the first civilian Director of the CIA, The Committee directed operations of RFE, and from 1951 to 1971, RFE was directly financed by the CIA, as an “anti-Communist propaganda” organization. There is an old saying in the CIA – “Once CIA, always CIA”. RFE was and is CIA, and Miller spent 10 years working for them in Eastern Europe. He is an expert propagandist and disinfo warrior, a professional bullshit artist, and his “new” job at Buzzfeed only continues that work. And the article Miller mentioned in his email to me is a perfect example of exactly how it works. [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]

A LIMITED HANGOUT

A limited hangout is a well known and often used disinfo technique where a limited amount of negative info about one’s own side is published in order to create a facade of openness and honesty, when in fact, it is a damage control and misdirection technique. As CIA agent and later whistleblower Victor Marchetti explained, a limited hangout is “a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and most damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.” [18], [19]

It turns out that the article Miller was writing was about the seven US citizens who had fought on the Ukrainian side of the Donbass War who were being investigated by the FBI for war crimes, one of whom, Craig Lang, is also wanted for a double murder in the USA. The fact that the FBI was in Ukraine investigating war crimes, and the fact that the basis for these investigations includes compelling and irrefutable physical, video and eyewitness evidence of horrific crimes, including kidnapping, rape, torture and multiple murders, and would have become public sooner or later, forced Western propagandists like Miller and Buzzfeed into conducting a limited hangout disinfo operation of the “We got the few bad apples, justice is served, nothing more to see, move on” variety. And in fact in the final published version of Miller’s article, there was no mention of me or of my “previous drug conviction”. Here’s why  [20], [21]

“Drug Dealer” Bentley, back in the day…

In 1996, I was arrested, along with seven other co-defendants, for being a part of a marijuana smuggling operation that moved hundreds of kilos of cannabis from Mexico to multiple destinations in the USA and Canada between 1991 and 1996. In 1996, I plead guilty to the fact that in 1992, I had indeed been in possession of 500 kilos of cannabis, and was sentenced to 63 months in prison for it. Unlike all my other co-defendants, I was the only one of the group who refused to “cooperate” with the cops or agree to testify. The others, equally or more guilty than I was, cooperated, and got reduced sentences of 18 months or a year and a day. Even the “kingpin” leader of the operation, who made multi-millions of dollars, only got three years compared to more than five years for me. So at least half of my sentence was for refusing to cooperate, not for cannabis possession. I did my five years in prison, plus four more years of “supervised release”, and my debt to society is paid in full, for a crime I committed 30 years ago.

It should also be noted, as it was in the official investigation, that our smuggling crew had two ironclad rules – no violence for any reason, and no hard drugs bought, sold or used. We only moved cannabis. My primary job was driving 100 pound loads from Mexico to Minnesota, wholesaling to distributors, and bringing the money back to the kingpin in South Texas. I was very good at my job. I made $25,000 per trip, which is pretty good pay for a couple of weeks’ work. But if I had instead moved 100 pounds of hard drugs like cocaine, heroin or meth, I could have made about a quarter million dollars per trip instead of $25,000. And, in fact, I had the opportunity and many offers to do so, and easily could have done so, had I wanted to. But I always refused. For moral reasons.

Cannabis is now legal in thirty three US states, and soon will be, nationwide, as it is in ten other countries, including Canada, Belgium and Holland. In fact, during the time I was smuggling weed, I was also a major player in the Marijuana Legalization Movement on the national and international levels, and I am one of the people who actually helped change the laws. But yes, it was illegal when I was a smuggler, and I did break the law, and I paid a hefty price for it too. But while I was admittedly an outlaw, I was never a criminal. I never hurt anybody. In fact, I am not the least bit ashamed or sorry for it, and make no apologies to anyone at all for it. The law I broke was stupid and unjust, and the fact that it is now changed only proves that there was no real crime, and I was simply punished for being a bit too far ahead of my time.

And here’s the point of all this, not one single ukrop propagandist, who brings up the subject of my conviction, including Miller, has ever called me a “marijuana smuggler” or said I was convicted of “marijuana possession”. It is always, every single fucking time, “drug dealer”. Which is semi-technically true, but still a lie. Because alcohol and tobacco are also, technically, and in reality, “drugs”. And in fact, both alcohol and tobacco are far more damaging to the individual, and to society in general than cannabis, and anyone who disputes that fact is either an idiot or a liar, or both. So, by this criterion, every corporation and every corner store that sells alcohol or tobacco is also a “drug dealer”, and dealing much more dangerous drugs than I ever did.

In the USA, alcohol directly kills 95,000 people every year, from overdose and illness. Add to that over 10,000 deaths and 290,000 serious injuries from DWI, not to mention addiction, domestic abuse, etc, and you begin to get an idea of the dangers of alcohol as a “drug”. But the damage caused by alcohol to individuals and society is eclipsed by the destruction that tobacco wreaks – 480,000 annual deaths directly related to tobacco use, ten years less average life expectancy, and an annual cost to society for medical care directly related to tobacco use in the USA of more than $300 Billion per year. In Russia, according to official studies, more than a million Russians die from alcohol and drugs every year, more than 500,000 directly from alcohol, and 300,000 from tobacco use. But for cannabis use, the statistics are clear, world-wide, and absolutely beyond dispute – not one single person, anywhere, has ever died from cannabis overdose or medical complications directly related to cannabis use. Not one, ever. To quote the US DEA report, “No deaths from marijuana overdose have (ever) been reported.” This fact is so well known and widely accepted by all medical surveys and government statistics that anyone who disputes it is an idiot and a liar, and an asshole. Period. [22], [23], [24], [25]

So, there IS a distinction between “drugs”, and anyone who calls me a “drug dealer” without mentioning the specific drug, is a liar and a hypocrite, unless they usually call convenience store clerks who sell cigarettes and bartenders who sell beer “drug dealers” too. And the ukrop trolls and presstitutes like Miller who call me a “drug dealer” instead of a weed smuggler, do so on purpose, with perjorative intent, trying to equate my breaking an unjust and stupid and now repealed law almost 30 years ago with contemporary mass murderers, rapists, torturers and war criminals. Don’t fall for their bullshit. Respect for the truth is the basis of all morality, and these liars are absolutely bereft of it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizarro_World

[2] use google search: “Ukraine Corruption”

[3] https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/corruption-rank

[4] https://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/03/ukraine-so-who-where-the-snipers.html

[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR1NFI6TBH0

[6] https://fort-russ.com/2019/10/ukraines-maidan-snipers-were-u-s-assets-from-georgia/

[7] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Kiev+snipers+confess&atb=v291-1&ia=web

[8] https://www.voltairenet.org/article182064.html

[9] https://liberalsarenuts.com/2020/07/26/they-nicknamed-him-american-gangsterhow-joe-biden-reportedly-oversaw-the-laundering-of-4-billion-of-american-aid-to-ukraine/

[10] https://tass.com/world/1345187

[11] https://borgenproject.org/10-facts-about-corruption-in-ukraine/

[12] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/aug/09/four-uk-news-sources-among-top-10-most-trusted-in-us-survey

[13] https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Radio_Free_Europe

[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Committee_for_a_Free_Europe

[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_organization

[16] https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Allen_Dulles

[17] https://www.rferl.org/author/christopher-miller/mgqvq_

[18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Marchetti

[20] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/christopherm51/craig-lang-ukraine-war-crimes-alleged

[21] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=craig+lang+florida+murder&t=ffab&atb=v291-1&ia=web

[22] https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/brochures-and-fact-sheets/alcohol-facts-and-statistics

[23] https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/tobacco_related_mortality/index.htm#death

[24] https://ria.ru/20210524/alkogol-1733584648.html

[25] https://www.scribd.com/document/541837402/Drug-of-Abuse

Read in English |

Ovaj esej se bavi temom vladavine prava, koja je odbačena poput korišćenog kondoma u susretu sa prostitutkom koju znate. U ovom slučaju, „mušterije“ prostitutke su vladajući političari, nekoliko medija (distributera pornografije) različitih ubeđenja su makroi, Evropska unija je opsednuti voajer filmova za odrasle, Savet Evrope je javna kuća, a Venecijanska komisija je prostitutka – pornografska zvezda.

Dakle, radi se o nečemu višem od političkog vođstva, radi se o medijima koje oni kontrolišu, a ponekad, o medijima obojene revolucije sa kojima moraju spavati, kao i o političkom felaciju koji izvode da bi opstali kao mafijaški entitet. Pripremite se za malo ludila koje ne liči ni na šta drugo nego na orgije u korumpiranom komšiluku, gde se disfunkcionalni parovi, u aranžmanima o razmeni žena, nikada ne oslobode mogućnosti ucene.

Prvo ćemo raščlaniti izveštavanje platforme obojene revolucije; omiljenog makroa obaveštajnih agencija EU i NATO-a, N1, podružnice CNN-a (poznate i kao Mreža lažnih vesti).

Venecijanska komisija je pozdravila inicijativu vlasti Srbije da usvoje predlog Zakona o referendumu i narodnoj inicijativi, ali je izjavila da ima više novih preporuka.

Venecijanska komisija saopštila je da novi predlog zakona, u potpunosti ili delimično, sledi većinu ključnih preporuka iz prethodnog hitnog mišljenja, koje ima za cilj da obezbedi njegovu usklađenost sa međunarodnim standardima. Ovo je pozitivan razvoj koji pozdravljamo,“ navodi se u izveštaju za medije, dodajući da postoje pitanja na kojima još treba raditi.

Nove preporuke obuhvataju ukidanje ili bar znatno smanjenje naknade za overu potpisa, proširenje prava žalbe na sve birače, davanje ovlašćenja izbornim komisijama da proveravaju potpise birača, da preciznije budu definisana ovlašćenja organa koji se bave predlozima referenduma i žalbama, da Zakon sadrži detaljnija pravila koja se primenjuju u hitnim slučajevima, da bude razmotreno produženje rokova za podnošenje žalbi i odlučivanje po njima.“ [1]

Samo, šta je tačno „Venecijanska komisija“ ZAPRAVO „pozdravila“? Pa, ovo zaista neće dopreti do svesti većine ljudi, jer se ne bavi suštinom teme. Svi, vladajuća stranka u parlamentu, opozicija koju podržavaju „liberalne demokratije“, sama Venecijanska komisija, i svakako ne najmanje važno, mediji sa obe strane borbe za budućnost jedne nacije ignorišu (ili se nisu potrudili da pročitaju) šta se navodno sprovodi reformom takozvanog referendumskog zakona; sa Venecijanskom komisijom (lažni organ za nametanje vladavine prava za države EU i NATO) koja (u stvari) govori „Odličan posao! Sada nam treba samo malo da sredimo stvari oko ovog pitanja.“

U međuvremenu, bivši saradnici obojene revolucije pretvorili su se u žarkog pristalicu režima, B92 (prevod na engleski ljubaznošću Srpskog monitora):

„Na jučerašnjoj sednici, Vlada Srbije usvojila je Predlog zakona o referendumu i narodnoj inicijativi. Ovim predlogom se ukida obavezni cenzus za izlazak potrebnog broja glasača kao uslova za uspeh referenduma.“ [2], [3]

A zatim, preko „režimu naklonjenog“, u vlasništvu srpskog tajkuna, Telegrafa:

„za promenu Ustava, odnosno za uspeh referenduma više nije potrebno 50 odsto izašlih od upisanih birača“ [4], [5]

U redu, do sada, sumirano, imamo: Venecijansku komisiju Saveta Evrope koja tapše Srbiju po ramenu zbog usklađivanja zakona Srbije sa komisijinim, ažuriranim (u 2020. godini) „Revidiranim smernicama o održavanju referenduma“ i nailazimo na suštinu stvari u delu sa podnaslovom III „specifična pravila” gde postoje vrlo neodređena pravila koja nisu obavezujuća (pravila koja zapravo nisu pravila) u pododeljku 7:

„7. Kvorum i posebna većina

a. Preporučljivo je da se ne određuje:

i. kvorum za izlaznost (cenzus, minimalni procenat)

ii. kvorum za odobrenje (odobrenje minimalnog procenta upisanih birača),

b. Za referendume o pitanjima od fundamentalnog ustavnog značaja prihvatljiv je kvorum za odobravanje ili posebna većina.

c. Uslov višestruke većine (većina birača koji učestvuju na referendumu plus većina u određenom broju entiteta) prihvatljiv je u saveznim i regionalnim državama, posebno za ustavne izmene.” [6]

Drugim rečima, ako vaš zakon zahteva registraciju 100% građana i birača (nivo participativne demokratije koji je praktično nepoznat) i zahteva da više od polovine biračkog tela, po ovom modelu, odobri promenu onoga što bi bilo istinska participativna demokratija, to se NE preporučuje prema tački a. i. i ii.

ALI, prema tačkama b. i c., ako je ovaj nivo participativne demokratije potreban u postojećem zakonu za odlučivanje o bilo kom pitanju od fundamentalnog ustavnog značaja ili za reviziju samog ustava, Venecijanska komisija ne može da to da ospori, ali to sigurno neće zahtevati.

Preformulisano, najjednostavnijom logikom: kada je kleptokratija toliko otuđila svoje centralno biračko telo, ne možete da naterate 50% javnosti sa pravom glasa da podrži promene o kojima će se suštinski lagati (otuđeno biračko telo to zna), „vladavina prava“, koju nameće Savet Evrope, nudi rupe u pravilima, koje omogućavaju kleptokratiji da nastavi sa budućim izmenama zakona, čime u velikoj meri ovlašćuju/daju moć kleptokratama.

Nema veze što se ovde navodno radi o promeni ustava u pogledu „reforme“ pravosuđa Srbije, kako bi se pokazale „najbolje prakse“ Saveta Evrope, presedan koji je ovde postavljen ukazuje na lakše krađe u budućnosti. Ono što je na vidiku je razlog zašto zapadna propagandna poluga obojene revolucije, poput N1, izbegava suštinsko pitanje i pomaže režimskim medijima u prikrivanju činjenica; budući da bi bez ove „promene pravila“ bilo skoro nemoguće promeniti ustav Srbije, da bi se, na primer, predao suverenitet nad Kosovom (neugodna smetnja u planovima Zapadne imperije za budućnost Srbije), ali sada, sa promenom pravila, nakon sledeće obojene revolucije zapadnih obaveštajnih agencija u Srbiji, ne bi trebalo da bude problema, ako novi režim dobije 16% odobrenja za određivanje nacionalnog pravca (predaja celog Kosova), na glasanju na koje izađe 30% ljudi, problem je rešen! (za imperiju).

Štaviše, ako je samo polovina ljudi sa pravom glasa registrovana za glasanje, u slučaju kada ova polovina registrovanog stanovništva čini čitavo biračko telo i 30% ovog registrovanog biračkog tela izađe na referendum, to zapravo znači da 8% ljudi u naciji može da odredi budućnost bilo koje nacije, po ovom modelu „liberalne demokratije“ (da ne pominjemo kako ovaj model olakšava put multinacionalnim korporacijama da ubuduće učvrste svoju moć nad nacijama poput Srbije).

Ovaj aranžman sa Savetom Evrope, institucijom koja je udružena sa Evropskom unijom, nameće model „demokratije“ koji je gori od nekih takozvanih „banana republika“ i ne podseća toliko ni na šta, koliko na korumpiranu plemensku politiku koju su SAD nametnule određenim starosedelačkim narodima. [7]

Sada, zapitajte se, da li su ovo ljudi kojima biste mogli poveriti da donose zakone i vode politiku u multinacionalnoj, korporativnoj, obogaćujućoj za farmaceutske kompanije pandemiji? [8]

[1] https://rs.n1info.com/english/news/venice-commission-welcomes-serbias-new-referendum-law-makes-recommendations/

[2] https://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2021&mm=11&dd=09&nav_category=11&nav_id=2054075

[3] https://www.serbianmonitor.com/en/no-threshold-in-referendums-required-any-longer/

[4] https://serbia.mom-rsf.org/en/owners/individual-owners/detail/owner/owner/show/veselin-jevrosimovic/

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3417457-the-constitution-of-serbia-to-be-changed-referendum-on-january-16

[6] https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2020)031-e#:~:text=Council%20of%20Europe%20CDL-AD%20%282020%29031-e%20Revised%20guidelines%20on,its%20124th%20online%20Plenary%20Session%20%288-9%20October%202020%29

[7] https://pw-portal.de/rezension/13718-the-right-of-self-determination-of-peoples-and-its-application-to-indigenous-peoples-in-the-usa_16444

[8] https://archive.li/RPeBl

*

Faktoid: Korona virus je 1000 puta manji od pora na maski kroz koju dišete. 30 studija: Maske ne funkcionišu

*

Čitajte na srpskom |

This essay goes to the subject of rule-of-law dispensed with like a used condom in an encounter with a familiar prostitute. In this case, the ‘johns’ are the ruling politicians, several media outlets (pornography distributors) of differing persuasions are the pimps, the European Union is an obsessed voyeur of x-rated film, Council of Europe is the whorehouse, and the Venice Commission is the prostitute-pornography star.

So, it’s more than about political leadership, it’s the media they control, and sometimes, it’s the color-revolution media they must sleep with as well as the political fellatio they perform to survive as a mafia entity. Prepare for a bit of insanity that resembles nothing so much as a corrupted neighborhood’s orgy habits where dysfunctional couples in wife-swapping arrangements never break free of the blackmail potential.

First we’ll break down the color-revolution platform reporting; courtesy of a favorite EU and NATO states intelligence agencies’ pimp, N1, a subsidiary of CNN (also known as Counterfeit News Network.)

^ “The Venice Commission welcome the initiative by the Serbian authorities to adopt a draft law on referendum and people’s initiative but said that it has more recommendations

“The Venice Commission said that the revised draft law has followed, totally or partially, most of the substantive recommendations of the previous urgent opinion, aimed at ensuring its conformity with international standards. This is a positive development which is welcomed,” a press release said adding that some issues still need to be addressed

“The new recommendations include abolishing or significantly reducing signature authentication fees, extend the right to appeal to all voters, giving election commissions the authority to check signatures, address the decision-making power of the bodies dealing with proposed referendums, complaints and appeals in a more precise way, provide more detailed rules applicable in the case of emergency, consider reasonably extending the deadlines for lodging and deciding on complaints and appeals” [1]

Just, exactly, what did ‘The Venice Commission’ ACTUALLY “welcome”? Well, it won’t really enter the minds of most people, because the core of the subject isn’t dealt with. Everyone, the ruling party at the parliament, the ‘liberal democracies’ backed opposition, The Venice Commission itself, and certainly not least, media on both sides of the fight over a nation’s future are overlooking (or didn’t bother to read) what is supposedly being implemented, in its reform of so-called referendum law; with the Venice Commission (faux rule-of-law enforcer for the EU & NATO states) saying (in effect) ‘Great job! Now, we just need a bit of tidying up around the issue.’

Meanwhile, over at former color-revolution collaborator turned the regime’s lover, B92 (English translation courtesy of Serbian Monitor)

“At yesterday’s session, the Government of Serbia adopted the draft Law on Referendum and Popular Initiative. This proposal abolishes the mandatory threshold of the required number of voters as a condition for a referendum to be valid” [2], [3]

And then, over at the ‘regime friendly’, Serbian oligarch owned, Telegraf:

“in order to the change the Constitution, that is, for the success of a referendum, it is no longer required for 50 percent of registered voters to turn out” [4], [5]

Ok, to now, summed up, we have: the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission patting Serbia on the back for bringing Serbian law into compliance with the commissions updated (2020) “Revised Guidelines on the Holding of Referendums” and we find the heart of the matter under the subheading III “specific rules” where there are very non-specific rules that are not binding (rules that actually are not rules) in subsection 7:

“7. Quorum and special majorities

“a. It is advisable not to provide for:

“i. a turn-out quorum (threshold, minimum percentage)

“ii. an approval quorum (approval by a minimum percentage of registered voters),

“b. An approval quorum or a specific majority requirement is acceptable for referendums on matters of fundamental constitutional significance.

“c. The requirement of a multiple majority (the majority of voters taking part in the referendum plus the majority in a specified number of entities) is acceptable in federal and regional states, in particular for constitutional revisions” [6]

In other words, if your law calls for 100% citizen-voter registration (a level of participatory democracy that is practically unknown) and it requires more than half of the electorate to approve a change in this model of what would have been a true participatory democracy, this is NOT recommended according to point a. i. & ii.

BUT, according to points b. & c. if this level of participatory democracy is required in existing law to decide any matter of fundamental constitutional significance or to revise the constitution itself, the Venice Commission can’t argue with that but they certainly won’t require it.

Restated in the most simple logic: when a kleptocracy has so alienated its core electorate you can’t get 50% of the eligible voting public to turn out to support changes that will be fundamentally lied about (the alienated electorate know this), the ‘rule of law’ enforcing Council of Europe offers loopholes in the rules enabling the kleptocracy to pursue future changes in law greatly enabling/empowering the kleptocrats.

Never mind this is ostensibly about changing the constitution in regards to ‘reforming’ Serbia’s judiciary to reflect the Council of Europe’s ‘best practices’, the precedent set here points to easier thefts in the future. It is what is on the horizon is why the Western color-revolution propaganda arms like N1 avoid the core issue and assist regime media in concealing the facts; whereas without this ‘rule change’ it would be nearly impossible to change Serbia’s constitution to, example given, surrender sovereignty over Kosovo (an irritation in the Western empire’s plans for the future of Serbia), but now with the rule change, following the next Western intelligence agencies’ color-revolution in Serbia, there should be no problem, if the new regime gets 16% approval determining the national direction (surrendering the entirety of Kosovo), in a vote where 30% of the people turned out to vote, the problem is solved! (for empire.)

Furthermore, if only one half of the eligible people are registered to vote, in a case where this one half of the populace being registered constitutes the whole of the electorate and 30% of this registered electorate turned out to vote in referendum, it is actually 8% of the nation’s people can determine the future of any nation in this ‘liberal democracy’ model (not to mention how this model smooths the way for multinational corporations future consolidating their grip on nations like Serbia.)

This arrangement with the European Union aligned institution, Council of Europe, enforces a ‘democracy’ model that is worse than some so-called ‘banana republics’ and resembles nothing so much as the corrupt tribal politics imposed on certain indigenous nations by the USA. [7]

Now, ask yourselves, are these people you could trust to make law & policy in a multinational, corporate, big pharma enriching pandemic? [8]

[1] https://rs.n1info.com/english/news/venice-commission-welcomes-serbias-new-referendum-law-makes-recommendations/

[2] https://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2021&mm=11&dd=09&nav_category=11&nav_id=2054075

[3] https://www.serbianmonitor.com/en/no-threshold-in-referendums-required-any-longer/

[4] https://serbia.mom-rsf.org/en/owners/individual-owners/detail/owner/owner/show/veselin-jevrosimovic/

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3417457-the-constitution-of-serbia-to-be-changed-referendum-on-january-16

[6] https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2020)031-e#:~:text=Council%20of%20Europe%20CDL-AD%20%282020%29031-e%20Revised%20guidelines%20on,its%20124th%20online%20Plenary%20Session%20%288-9%20October%202020%29

[7] https://pw-portal.de/rezension/13718-the-right-of-self-determination-of-peoples-and-its-application-to-indigenous-peoples-in-the-usa_16444

[8] https://archive.li/RPeBl

*

Factoid: The corona virus is 1,000 x smaller than the pores in the mask you breathe through. 30 studies: Masks Don’t Work

*

Read in English |

Nacionalizam vs maligni nacionalizam vs imperijalizam

Biti (izdajnik globalizma) ili ne biti (izdajnik sopstvene kulture). Pitanje je sad.

Teza kako je predstavljena, u igri Šekspirovih reči, slabo prikriva komunikacioni trik; to nisu različite stvari, već iste. Između ova dva ne postoji pitanje u bilo kom smislu šta je zapravo predstavljeno, već samo posmatranje jedne činjenice sa različitim tumačenjem, iz različite perspektive.

Multikulturalizam u smislu globalizma, istorijski gledano, rezultat je osvajanja putem imperijalizma. Kraći primer bi bio Rim i „romanski jezici“, koji odražavaju stvaranje rimske lingvističke monokulture, koja se vremenom prelila u italijanski, rumunski, katalonski, španski, portugalski i francuski, koji su bili najzastupljeniji i delili katolicizam, osim Rumunije, koja je uglavnom pravoslavna zbog svog geografskog položaja i istorije, povezane sa onim što je postalo Istočno rimsko carstvo. U svakom geografskom slučaju, izvorni jezici su raseljeni, marginalizovani ili izumrli (uključujući Italiju, na primer etrurski), zajedno sa izvornim kulturama i religijama.

Na prvi pogled, ovo se može činiti kao iznenađujući rezultat. Kako su mnoge kulture postale ono što čini monokulturu? Kako su mnogi jezici i kulture podlegli jednom jeziku i kulturi, koji su postali nova porodica (bliskih) jezika i kultura?

Jednostavno je, kao što je latinski postao jezik kojim čovek treba da govori tečno, da bi kompetentno funkcionisao unutar intra-imperijalističkih struktura kao celine. Da li se ovo desilo preko noći? Ne. Ali, to se konačno DESILO; da bi funkcionisalo kao Galija, od koje je postala Francuska, zahtevalo je radnu upotrebu latinskog, kada je prilika dozvolila (ili je Rim zahtevao). Da bi čovek živeo i radio u Iberiji, od koje je postala Španija, ništa drugačije od naroda nekoliko iberijskih plemena koji su morali da savladaju latinski da bi funkcionisali u ekonomiji globalizma tog doba. Vremenom, svi su postali „romanizovani“ u novoj, pokrštenoj monokulturi. Multikulturalizam Rimskog carstva se tada stopio u novu monokulturu i Evropa je izgubila neprocenjivu količinu kulturne raznolikosti, uključujući izumiranje mnogih jezika.

Savremeni globalizam ne samo da ukazuje na ponavljanje ovog društvenog fenomena multikulturalizma, koji podrazumeva izumiranje kultura i stvaranje nove monokulture; već preti i ubrzanim procesom u doba takozvane „svetske mreže“ (world-wide-web).

Bila je to Siseli Izabel Ferfild koja je oštroumno tvrdila:

„Nema ni najmanjeg razloga da se nacionalizam, što je težnja naroda da bude ono što jeste, poistoveti sa imperijalizmom, što je težnja naroda da spreči druge narode da budu ono što jesu.“

Šta Ferfildova ovde želi da razreši? Citat je kontekstualizovan u događajima koji su doveli do Drugog svetskog rata, i događajima s njegovog samog početka, i invazije nacističke Nemačke na više evropskih država. Po shvatanju Ferfildove, francuski pokret otpora bi, naročito, bio pravilnije definisan kao „nacionalistički“ (patriotski), za razliku od njihovih nemačkih okupatora, koji bi trebalo da se preciznije definiše kao „imperijalistički“. U mukama koje su prethodile ratu, tokom propagandnih događaja samog rata, a posebno posle Drugog svetskog rata, ovaj nemački imperijalizam se, etimološki, okrenuo naglavačke, zbog jednostavne činjenice što su Nemci sebe deklarisali kao „nacionalne socijaliste“, usadili kao negativan termin „nacionalista“ i „nacionalizam“, a u stvari, ovo je izopačena upotreba reči koju ne treba razlikovati od patriotizma.

Da istaknemo, zdrav nacionalizam ne treba da se razlikuje od patriotizma, uključujući i nacionalne manjine, prema kojima istorijski postoji tolerantan stav. S druge strane, maligni nacionalizam (narcistički nacionalizam) može biti rezultat društvene mutacije stanovništva pod pritiscima, koji prete da ugroze njihovu kulturu i/ili siguran osećaj blagostanja. Nemci su radikalno doživeli ovu transformaciju, posle Prvog svetskog rata, zbog ekonomskih faktora, otežanih kaznenim uslovima uključenim u Versajski sporazum. Zbog šire imperijalističke istorije i mentaliteta zapadne Evrope (nasleđe Rima i katoličanstva, između ostalih istorijskih faktora i aktera), nemački „preporod“, nakon višestrukih pruskih inkarnacija (i ne zaboravimo etnički nemačku dinastiju Habsburg) je doživeo da je maligni nacionalizam neizbežno izražen u imperijalizmu. Stare navike se teško menjaju. Zdrav konzervativizam ili patriotski nacionalizam ne treba mešati sa malignim ili narcističkim nacionalizmom, posebno sa malignim nacionalizmom koji se prepliće sa imperijalizmom.

Takođe, današnje narušavanje demografske ravnoteže, sa velikim prilivom ljudi radikalno drugačijeg kulturnog pogleda, može dovesti do toga da se zdrav nacionalizam preobrazi u lokalizovani maligni nacionalizam, koji vidi da tolerancija jenjava i čak nestaje kako rastu društvene tenzije; na primer u onim mnogim slučajevima velikih predgrađa Evrope (na primer: Stokholm, Brisel, Pariz, Berlin) gde radikalna primena šerijatskog zakona de facto vlada čitavim naseljima u suprotnosti sa nominalno potrebnim sekularnim zakonom zemlje domaćina. Upravo ovo razaranje autoriteta preti tradicionalnom, autohtonom konzervativizmu i, ranije opušteniju, društvenu toleranciju mutira u društveno preživljavanje, vođenje instinktom, netoleranciju.

U ovoj varijaciji nacionalizma (patriotizma) 21. veka, koji je pod pritiskom da postane maligni nacionalizam, postmoderni liberali optužuju društvene konzervativce da u ovoj početnoj fazi naglašavaju da su „nacionalisti“ u pogrdnom smislu te reči, što je neiskreno. U stvari, liberali su ti koji doprinose budućoj i sve većoj „malignosti“ odbijanjem da brane sopstveno kulturno poreklo, što refleksno zahteva „toleranciju“ prema onome što predstavlja de facto rušenje poretka zasnovanog na vladavini prava u kulturi. U današnjem svetu, upravo su „liberali“ evropskog mentaliteta sa slabo prikrivenim carskim ambicijama oboje: i pomagač i gonič koji radikalizuje evropska društva. Države NATO-a su imperijalna sila koja stvara veliko, raseljeno stanovništvo (na primer Irak, Avganistan, Libija, Sirija i Ukrajina i neke zemlje podsaharske Afrike), a politika Evropske unije zahteva apsorbovanje mnogo miliona ovih naroda (uglavnom) radikalno različitih kultura; sa ugušenim otporom svakog pojedinačnog naroda EU.

Problem Viktora Orbana, dakle, nije samo zahtev Evropske unije da Mađarska „integriše“ brojno stanovništvo strane kulture u evropsku, ranije sufi, muslimansku zajednicu, koju agresivno prozelitizira radikalni, fundamentalistički vehabizam sponzorisan od strane Saudijske Arabije, već su njegov problem i imperijalne ambicije NATO-a. Ako su vojske NATO-a isto što i legije carskog Rima iz 21. veka, Evropska unija je administrativni aparat novog Rimskog carstva. Orbanov problem je što Mađarska pripada i jednima i drugima; efekat legija i posledica administrativnog aparata, sastavni su deo jednog uređenja nove imperije. Istini za volju, svako pravljenje razlike između NATO-a i EU je cepidlačenje; ovo nisu samo bratske organizacije, već potpuno spojeni sijamski blizanci.

Iz toga sledi, evropski demokratski sekularizam, a oni koji se nalaze u Orbanovoj situaciji moraju da se suoče sa tim, pokazuje da je nešto više od teorijskog pojma; njegove demokratske tradicije, navodno potekle iz Grčke, inspirisane „prosvetljenjem“, u stvarnosti više liče na zavist Gaja Julija Cezara prema ostavštini vojnih osvajanja, koje pripada Aleksandru III Makedonskom.

Postmoderni hibrid nemačkog imperijalizma i engleskog jezika

Ako je senat ovog novog carskog Rima u Strazburu, a sedište carskih legija u Briselu, careva rezidencija je u Berlinu. Pošto se poslednjih decenija agresivno širio, istovremeno projektujući sopstveno ponašanje na Rusiju, kao da veruje da je ta nacija nova Kartagina, možemo ukratko ispitati sadašnju imperijalnu ekspanziju Zapadne Evrope na Zapadnom Balkanu, da bismo procenili u mikrokosmosu ponavljanje istorije na makrokosmičkom nivou.

Kao što je navedeno u eseju Obrazovanje i špijunaža, obaveštajna procena nemačke obaveštajne agencije, Bundesnachrichtendienst, da se prilagođavanje/podrivanje srpske akademske zajednice „liberalnom“ političkom stavu vrši preko Konrad Adenauer Siftung u Beogradu, povezanog sa nemačkom Hrišćansko-demokratskom unijom, to je van domašaja da bi se povezalo sa političkim stavom Ursule fon der Lajen, dugogodišnje ministarke u vladi CDU (Hrišćansko-demokratske unije) premeštene na mesto predsednika Evropske komisije u vezi takozvanog „Autoputa mira“ Srbija-Kosovo:

„ „Zaista neverovatna stvar, on povezuje sa Austrijom i Grčkom i to je zaista pokretač za privredu Srbije, za trgovinu, za investicije. Ovo je ekonomski plan koji već funkcioniše u Srbiji i zaista mi povezujemo Evropu“, rekla je ona i dodala da većina mladih u Srbiji zaslužuje zeleniju, prosperitetniju i digitalnu budućnost.“

Da, možda, sve dok Novi Rim drži carsku legiju (NATO-v KFOR) u mestu, kako bi insinuirao da ova infrastruktura omogućava brzo kretanje savremene ratne opreme (tenkova, haubica, transportera), ako bi Srbija pokušala da ponovo potvrdi suverenitet nad okupiranom srpskom većinskom teritorijom na severu Kosova. Povrh ovoga, misionarstvo/prozelitizam finansiran od strane Saudijske Arabije i Turske, kojem je dozvoljeno da divlja na Kosovu, nastoji da umereni islam izvornih kosovskih muslimana bude zamenjen agresivnim i radikalnim vehabizmom. Ovo nije autoput do mira. O, da, i o toj „digitalnoj“ budućnosti za mlade; svetskom mrežom dominiraju Englezi, parlamentarci EU, da bi prešli etničke granice, govore na engleskom, akademici širom evropskih nacionalnih granica komuniciraju na engleskom, mnoge „međunarodne“ škole koje su dostupne današnjoj omladini predaju na engleskom, i međunarodna ekonomija i poslovni odnosi širom Evrope se vode na engleskom jeziku. Engleski je jezik novog carskog Rima i jezik buduće monokulture, koji bi trebalo da se pobrine da srpski i drugi jezici počnu da nestaju u ne tako dalekoj budućnosti.

Zatim, „sestrinska“ partija nemačke Hrišćansko-demokratske unije, bavarska Hrišćansko-socijalna unija (Bavarska je bila najmanje „denacifikovana“ nemačka država) poklanja Balkanu vansudski imenovanog (kršeći Dejtonski sporazum, jer ga ne potvrđuje Savet bezbednosti UN) visokog predstavnika za Bosnu Kristijana Šmita:

„Najava člana Predsedništva [Republike Srpske] Milorada Dodika da će govoriti o mirnom raspadu zemlje, kako je sada počeo da najavljuje, da raspusti vojsku i da vrati staru vojsku Republike Srpske. Mislim da je ovo vreme da jasno stavimo do znanja da međunarodna zajednica nije obavezna da ulazi u situacije u koje smo upravo dospeli devedesetih. Nema mirnog raspuštanja.”

Šmitov jezik o Republici Srpskoj je višestruko neiskren; nije se koristio termin „raspad“ (Šmitova hiperbola), nije bilo reči o „raspuštanju“ bosanske vojske, već o tome da bosanska vojska napusti teritoriju Republike Srpske sa zahtevom da svi srpski pripadnici te vojne snage koji izaberu da ostanu u njoj, treba da odu sa njom; i konačno, „nema mirnog raspuštanja“ izgleda kao slabo prikrivena pretnja da se vrate legije novog carskog Rima da zastraše „pravo na samoopredeljenje naroda“ Republike Srpske, utemeljeno na međunarodnom pravu. U stvari, pozivanje Republike Srpske na pravo na samoopredjeljenje, osnov na kojem je Milorad Dodik objavio „mirno povlačenje“, zasnovano je na povelji o Međunarodnim sporazumima Ujedinjenih nacija; Republika Srpska je priznati politički entitet sa etničkom većinom i stoga ima pravo da ostvari pravo na samoopredjeljenje putem plebiscita. Problem carske rezidencije u Berlinu sa ovim je u tome što međunarodno pravo pruža put ka nacionalnom suverenitetu Republike Srpske, a ovaj nacionalni suverenitet je u suprotnosti sa ciljem imperije. Sve u svemu, Šmit je dokazani lažov; u stavu Republike Srpske nema izražene namere da se vrati nasilju iz devedesetih, pre je ova pretnja nasiljem pretnja novog Rimskog carstva projektovana na Republiku Srpsku.

Još jedan „izaslanik“ koji ponavlja stav carske rezidencije u Berlinu bila bi Viola fon Kramon, izvestilac Evropskog parlamenta za Kosovo, gurajući nos tamo gde mu očigledno nije mesto:

„[Izražavanje prava Republike Srpske na samoopredjeljenje] je jednostavno neprihvatljivo i ugrožava sav napredak koji je postignut u posleratnom periodu. Bosna i Hercegovina je još vrlo krhka, a opet složena, i mi pomno pratimo tamošnju situaciju, tražeći snažan evropski odgovor, odnosno sankcije za sve one koji potkopavaju suverenitet države, jačanje EUFOR-a na terenu i sprečavanje Hrvatske i Srbije da se mešaju u unutrašnje stvari Bosne i Hercegovine.“

Na sva usta lažna zabrinutost i pretnje nemačke plemkinje, čiji Hajnrih Bel Siftung u Beogradu, odslikava navike obaveštajnih službi Konrad Adenauer Siftunga u Beogradu, zabeležene u prethodno pomenutom, povezanom eseju „Obrazovanje i špijunaža“.

Ako bi se dozvolilo da se etnički hrvatski region (mirno) pridruži Hrvatskoj i dozvolilo da se etnički srpski region (mirno) pridruži Srbiji, bilo bi mnogo manje mogućnosti za ponovno oživljavanje malignog nacionalizma i sukoba iz ranijih vremena, samo bi preostao bošnjački entitet koji je dočekao džihadiste Al Kaide tokom balkanskih ratova devedesetih i od tada izvozi domaće uzgojene džihadiste u nekoliko imperijinih sukoba na Bliskom istoku. Opa! Novi Rim neće želeti da to bude izloženo bilo kom međunarodnom mikroskopu!! (uz napomenu da je Francuska izvezla daleko više). Rezultirajuća muslimanska bošnjačka država (po svoj prilici umerena) imala bi tri puta više stanovnika od Crne Gore, ali ova vrsta „inkluzivnosti“ nije entitet koji je dobrodošao u sadašnjoj imperijinoj zamisli. Umesto toga, razmaženo-post-moderno-teutonsko-plemensko-političko „plemstvo“ novog Rima, fon Kramon, više bi volela da se legije NATO-a vrate u Bosnu pod okriljem EUFOR-a, stvarajući veštačku multikulturalnu državu u kojoj tinjaju nerešene etničke tenzije.

Na kraju, ovaj novi Rim bi trebalo da ukaže na nešto sasvim drugačije od različitosti u pogledu propagande nasuprot stvarnosti; trebalo bi da bude razotkriveno da nova zamisao Imperije uključuje sve elemente koji ukazuju na reprizu degeneracije starog Rima. Sve je tu: imperijalne strukture, faktori koji ukazuju na buduće urušavanje iznutra i razvoj lingvističke monokulture, koja je predodređena da istisne i dovede do budućeg izumiranja veći deo kulturne raznolikosti koju Evropska unija tako glasno tvrdi da čuva.

Spojeni blizanci Evropska unija/NATO-v imperijalizam su oni koji trenutno stvaraju brojne slučajeve malignog nacionalizma i na taj način narušavaju mir nacija i izopačuju nacionalni patriotizam, što bi na kraju trebalo da ukaže na sopstvenu propast ovog novog Rima. Međutim, ovo nije pozorišni komad, ovim glumcima se ne može verovati jednako kao što oni sami sebi veruju.

*

Srbija

*

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Čitajte na srpskom |

To be (treasonous to globalism) or not to be (treasonous to one’s own culture.) That is the question.

The proposition as presented, in a play on Shakespeare’s words, thinly conceals a communications trick; these are not distinct things but the same. There is no question between the two in any sense of what is actually presented, only observation of a single fact from separate construction-perspective.

Multiculturalism in a sense of globalism, historically speaking, is a result of conquest via imperialism. The short example given would be Rome and the ‘Romance Languages’ reflecting Rome’s creation of a linguistic monoculture that, over time, devolved into Italian, Romanian, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese and French being the most spoken, and sharing Catholicism excepting Romania, which is largely Orthodox due to its geographic location and history tied to what became the Eastern Roman Empire. In every geographic case, the original languages are displaced, marginalized or extinct (including in Italy, e.g. Etruscan), together with the original cultures and religions.

At first glance, this might seem a surprising result. How did many cultures become what amounts to a monoculture? How did many languages and cultures succumb to a single language and culture that became a new family of (closely related) languages and cultures?

It is as simple as Latin became the language one had to become fluent in, to competently function within the intra-empire structures as a whole. Did this happen overnight? No. But it finally DID happen; to function as a Gaul from what became France, demanded a working use of Latin when opportunity afforded (or Rome demanded) one live and work in Iberia in what became Spain, no different to peoples of the several Iberian tribes had to master Latin to function in the economy of the globalism of that era. Over time, everyone became ‘Romanized’ in a new, Christianized, monoculture. The Roman empire’s multiculturalism, then, had melded into a new monoculture and Europe lost an incalculable amount of cultural diversity, including the extinction of many languages.

Modern globalism not only points to a repeat of this social phenomenon of multiculturalism leading to cultural extinctions and a new monoculture; but threatens an accelerated process in the age of the so-called ‘world-wide-web.’

It was Cicily Isabel Fairfield astutely asserted:

“There is not the smallest reason for confounding nationalism, which is the desire of a people to be itself, with imperialism, which is the desire of a people to prevent other peoples from being themselves

What is Fairfield disentangling here? The quote is contextualized in the events leading up to, and the beginning of, World War Two, and Nazi Germany’s invasions of multiple European states. In Fairfield’s understanding, the French resistance, particularly, would be more properly defined as ‘nationalist’ (patriot), as opposed to their German occupiers, which should be more properly defined ‘imperialist.’ In the throes leading up to the war, during the propaganda events of the war itself, and especially aftermath of WWII, this German imperialism, in an etymology turned on its head, for the simple fact the Germans labeled themselves “National Socialists”, inculcated a weaponized use of the term ‘nationalist’ & ‘nationalism’ but in fact this is a perverted use of a word that should be indistinguishable from patriotism.

To drive home the point, a healthy nationalism should be indistinguishable from patriotism, inclusive of, and historically tolerant of, national minorities. On the other hand, malignant nationalism (narcissistic nationalism) can be result of social mutation of a populace under pressures that threaten their culture and/or a secure sense of well being. The Germans radically experienced this transformation, following  World War One due to economic factors aggravated by the punitive terms incorporated into the Treaty of Versailles. Due to larger Western Europe’s imperial history & mentality (a legacy of Rome & Catholicism among other historical factors & actors), Germany’s ‘rebirth’ following on multiple Prussian incarnations (and let’s not forget the ethnic German Habsberg dynasty) saw malignant nationalism inevitably expressed in imperialism. Old habits die hard. Healthy conservatism or a patriotic nationalism should not be confounded with a malignant or narcissistic nationalism, particularly the malignant nationalism which becomes entangled with imperialism.

As well, today’s upsetting the demographic stability with a large influx of people with radically different cultural view can cause a healthy nationalism to morph into a localized malignant nationalism that sees tolerance erode and even vanish as social tensions rise; for instance in those many cases of large suburban areas of Europe (examples given: Stockholm, Brussels, Paris, Berlin) where radical application of Sharia law de facto rules entire neighborhoods in contravention of the host nation’s nominally required secular law. It is this erosion of authority threatens traditional, indigenous conservatism and mutates a previously more relaxed social tolerance into a social survival, instinct driven, intolerance.

In this 21st Century variation of nationalism (patriotism) pressured into becoming malignant nationalism, postmodern liberals accuse the social conservatives in this initial phase of stresses of being “Nationalist” in a weaponized sense of the word that is disingenuous. In actuality, it is the liberals are contributing towards a future & growing ‘malignancy’ with a refusal to defend their own cultural origins that reflexively demands ‘tolerance’ of what amounts to the de facto overthrow of a culture’s rule of law based order. In today’s world, it is the European mentality’s ‘liberals’ thinly concealed imperial ambitions are both; the midwife and the driver radicalizing European societies. NATO states are the imperial force creating large, displaced populations (examples given would be Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria & Ukraine, and some sub-Sahara Africa countries) and European Union policy demands absorbing millions of these (mostly) radically different cultures’ populace; with any individual EU nations’ resistance suppressed.

Victor Orban’s problem, then, isn’t only the European Union’s demand Hungary ‘integrate’ a large, culturally alien populace into a European, formerly Sufi, Muslim community being aggressively proselytized by Saudi sponsored radical, fundamentalist Wahhabism, but his problem is also the imperial ambitions of NATO. If NATO armies amount to an Imperial Rome’s 21st Century Legions, the European Union is new Imperial Rome’s administrative apparatus. Orban’s problem is, Hungary belongs to both; the legions effect and the administrative apparatus consequence, are part and parcel of the one arrangement of a new empire. Strictly speaking, any distinguishing between NATO and the EU is splitting hairs; these are not merely fraternal organizations as much as they are fully co-joined Siamese twins.

It follows, European democratic secularism, and those in Orban’s circumstance must face this, demonstrates it is little more than theoretical abstract; its supposed Greek derived, ‘enlightenment’ inspired, democratic traditions in actuality more resemble Gaius Julius Caesar’s envy over the military conquests legacy belonging to Alexander III of Macedon.

A Post-Modern Hybrid of German Imperialism & English Language

If this new Imperial Rome’s Senate is in Strasbourg, and the Imperial Legions’ headquarters are located at Brussels, the Emperor’s residence is in Berlin. Having aggressively expanded in recent decades, while projecting its own behaviors on Russia as though it believed that nation were the new Carthage, we can shortly examine Western Europe’s present imperial expansion in the Western Balkans to assess in a microcosm, the repeat of history at the macro-cosmic level.

As put forward in the essay Education & Espionage, an intelligence assessment of German intelligence agency, Bundesnachrichtendienst, conforming/subverting Serbian academia to the ‘liberal’ political stance via Germany’s Christian Democratic Union associated Konrad Adenauer Siftung at Belgrade, it is not a reach to tie this to the policy position of Ursula von der Leyen; a longtime CDU government minister moved on to EU Commission President concerning the Serbia-Kosovo so-called “Peace Highway”

“”Truly an unbelievable thing, it connects with Austria and Greece and this is truly a motor for the Serbian economy, trade and investment. This is an economic plan that is already functioning in Serbia and we truly are connecting Europe,” she said, adding that the majority of youth in Serbia deserved a greener, prosperous and digital future”

Yes, perhaps, so long as the New Rome keeps an Imperial Legion (NATO’s KFOR) in place to insinuate this infrastructure facilitates the rapid movement of modern armor (tanks, howitzers, personnel carriers) were Serbia to attempt reasserting sovereignty over the occupied Serbian majority territory in the north of Kosovo. On top of this, Saudi & Turkish funded missionary/proselytizing allowed to run amok in Kosovo are seeing the moderate Islam of the original Kosovar Muslims displaced by the aggressive & radical Wahhabism. This is no highway to peace. Oh, and about that ‘digital’ future for the youth; the world-wide-web is dominated by English, EU parliamentarians, to cross ethnic boundaries, speak in English, academics from across Europe’s national  boundaries communicate in English, the many ‘international’ schools made available to today’s youth instruct in English, and international economics & business relations across Europe are conducted in English. English is the new Imperial Rome’s & future monoculture language that should see Serbian and other languages begin to vanish in not so distant future.

Then, the German Christian Democratic Union’s ‘sister’ party, Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (Bavaria was the least ‘denazified’ German state) gifts the Balkans with the extra-judicially appointed (in violation of the Dayton Accords because he is not confirmed by the UN Security Council) High Representative for Bosnia Christian Schmidt:

“[Republika Srpska’s] Presidency member Milorad Dodik’s announcement that he will talk about the peaceful disintegration of the country, as he has now begun to announce, to disband the army and have an old Republika Srpska army. I think this is the time to make it clear that the international community is not bound to get into the situations we just got into in the 1990s. There is no peaceful dissolution”

Schmidt’s language concerning the Republika Srpska is disingenuous in multiple instance; there was no use of the language “Disintegration” (Schmidt’s hyperbole), there was no language concerning “disbanding” the Bosnian army but rather having the Bosnian army depart Republika Srpska’s territory with demand any Serbian members of that military force choosing to stay with it, should depart with it; and finally, “there is no peaceful dissolution” would appear a thinly veiled threat to return the new Imperial Rome’s legions to deter the Republika Srpska’s international law founded “right to self-determination of peoples.” In fact Republika Srpska’s claim to a right of self determination, the basis underlying Milorad Dodik’s “peaceful withdrawal” announcement, is chartered in United Nations treaty law; Republika Srpska is a recognized ethnic majority political entity and therefore is entitled to exercise a right of self-determination via plebiscite. The Imperial residence at Berlin’s problem with this is, international law affords avenue to Republika Srpska’s national sovereignty and this national sovereignty is at odds with the purpose of empire. All in all, Schmidt is demonstrably a liar; there is no expressed intention in the Republika Srpska’s position to return to the violence of the 1990s, rather this threat of violence is the new Rome’s Imperial threat projected onto Republika Srpska.

Another ‘envoy’ parroting the Emperor’s residence at Berlin would be Viola von Cramon, the European Parliament’s Rapporteur for the Western Balkans, poking the European Union’s (in effect, Germany’s) nose where it clearly doesn’t belong:

”[Republika Srpska’s expressing a right to self-determination] is simply unacceptable and jeopardises all the progress that has been made in the post-war period. Bosnia and Herzegovina is still very fragile, yet complex, and we are closely monitoring the situation there, seeking a strong European response, i.e., sanctions for all those who undermine the country’s sovereignty, strengthen EUFOR on the ground and stop Croatia and Serbia from interfering in internal affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina”

What a mouthful of faux concern and threats from the German noble whose Heinrich Böll Siftung in Belgrade, mirrors the German intelligence agency habits of the Konrad Adenauer Siftung in Belgrade the reader will discover in the related essay “Education & Espionage.”

If one were to allow the ethnic Croat region to join Croatia (peacefully) and allow the ethnic Serb region to join Serbia (peacefully), there would far less opportunity for resurgence of malignant nationalism and conflict of the former time, only a remaining Bosniak entity that had welcomed al Qaida jihadis during the 90’s Balkans wars and since has exported home-grown jihadis across the several empire middle East conflicts. Whoa! The new Rome won’t want that exposed to any international microscope!! (noting France has exported by far more.) A resultant Muslim Bosniak state (presumably a moderate one) would have 3 times the population of Montenegro but this sort of ‘inclusiveness’ isn’t a welcome entity in the present Imperial design. Rather the new Rome’s brat-cum-post-modern-Teutonic-tribal-politics ‘nobility’, von Cramon, would prefer NATO’s legions be returned to Bosnia under cover of EUFOR, perpetrating an artificial multicultural state simmering with unresolved ethnic tensions.

At the end of the day, this new Rome should point to something altogether different to diversity in regards to the propaganda versus the reality; it should be exposed the new Imperial design incorporates all of the elements indicating reprise of the old Rome’s devolution are in place. It’s all there: the Imperial structures, the factors pointing to a future crumbling from within, and a developing linguistic monoculture destined to displace & drive to future extinction much of the cultural diversity the European Union so famously claims it treasures.

It is the co-joined twins European Union/NATO’s imperialism presently creates manifold cases of malignant nationalism and thusly upsets the peace of nations and perverts national patriotism, which should ultimately point to this new Rome’s own demise. This is not a fiction’s play, nevertheless, these staged actors cannot be believed even as they believe themselves.

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

A Sociopaths & Democracy Project

All original work and art © copyright by Ronald Thomas West; for profit and mass paper media redistribution prohibited

 

 

“The idea of becoming “NSA-proof” is just silly. If they want it, they can get it” Joseph Lorenzo Hall

“I’m going to slip up and they’re going to hack me. It’s going to happen” Edward Snowden

All the encryption in the world isn’t going to protect, example given, a computer with a NSA, GCHQ, Unit 8200 or other intelligence agency’s undetectable keylog trojan, trust me. But first, a bit of my story and then onto how (not, actually) to leak:

When I’d exited the U.S. Army in April, 1976, I held a top secret clearance. The only documents I had taken with me were a complete record of my military 201 file. I also had (since) acquired copies of my veterans and social security files. How I’d managed copies of these are a secret, along the lines of Benjamin Franklin’s ‘three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.’ In this regard, it is worth mentioning I have held information between my ears that has never been spoken of in presence of mobile device, let alone entered into a computer or sent via any email.

Ok, so I can tell how I acquired the social security file, the social security administration fucked up and mailed me my own file. Yes, the original, which I went through with what certain people might have assumed would be great satisfaction, as supposedly I realized I was the censor who’d decide what I could see in my file. Of course I redacted or with-held nothing in my self exam, prior to sending the file on to my attorney who notified the social security administration we were (supposedly) inadvertently in possession of the file and to who should we send it to? A lady at the administration, in subsequent conversation, commented to myself something along the lines of ‘NO ONE has had the access to their file that you have had…’

But in fact this social security business was patent bs. Almost certainly the file had been deliberately sent my way, stripped of certain records (they missed pulling one critical document pointing to this), to throw me off the trail of then senators Max Baucus and Conrad Burns who both were complicit in covering up crimes at United States Forest Service offices in Montana on environmental issues, and suspects in regards to my file having been sequestered for months at the Social Security offices in Maryland while it was investigated whether I could be charged with fraud. Why? The USA appears to have left no stone unturned in efforts to take myself out of the public circulation due to my anti-corruption work of that era (1990s.) Apart from this, it was about this time I’d produced copies of records from my VA (military veteran) file after certain originals had gone missing following an ‘expert’ sent from Washington to Helena (Montana, where my VA file was kept) to ‘review’ files, kept me from charges of fraud relating to my veteran’s disability pension.

This (failed) ‘deep state’ caper in regards to attempt at trumping up felony charges intended to send me to jail and end my work, follows typical false flag spy-craft model. The people hearing the case, had it been successfully pursued, would have been innocents looking at a record they could not know (or believe) had been tampered with, to secure a conviction. My having copies of my VA file documents, saved my butt. I produced the necessary copy of a critical document at the initial hearing and the case was dismissed on the spot.

It wasn’t until I’d dug into the USA’s funding of charter schools as cover for intelligence embeds, the agencies had begun playing hardball or, that is to say, devoted resources to taking me out physically (assassination.)

Prior to this, during my stint with Special Forces, I’d the best possible education in operations and intelligence because it was not school, but OJT (on-the-job-training) with veterans of operations coordinated with CIA in Indochina and Central America. This was the best (or worst, depending on one’s perspective) avenue to knowledge in the ‘game’ of international intrigue; it was unrestricted, first hand knowledge of the dirty aspect of the business on the ground, where the intrigues hatched by criminal minds at Langley, Virginia, are played out.  Suffice it to say, I departed Special Forces with a remarkable understanding of how underhanded the game of spies is played, the paramount importance of employing psychology to one’s advantage (in often devious ways), and the imperative necessity of the death of one’s conscience to be successful and survive. Having only learned about, not employed these nefarious skills, I took my conscience and ethics, intact, with me on departure, together with the remarkable tool kit I’d developed through this experience, in subsequent work as investigator. My favorite of these skills had been open source analysis, in fact in light of the avalanche of criticisms since the Snowden revelations, it has been pointed out CIA open source analysis has been more effective, by far, than any NSA program, in relation to spy-craft.

Now, applying old school spy-craft, to the point of this essay; how NOT to leak-

Since WikiLeaks had been locked out of its own leak platform we’ve had ‘OpenLeaks‘ (a flop) and since we’ve had the deceptive & falsely named, pandering to fools, so-called ‘SecureDrop‘ (remember Reality Winner?)

However ‘SecureDrop’ might have been well intended, I wouldn’t touch it with the proverbial ten-foot pole. What’s more is, I doubt you’d even need it, if you wished to leak. I’ll go into the why you wouldn’t need it first, and then why I wouldn’t touch it.

If you wished to have a secure platform to leak documented criminal activities from, as opposed to a supposedly ‘secure’ online platform to leak to, you should be able to build one yourself. And you shouldn’t need to be a computer guru to do it. The recipe is exceedingly simple:

Acquire a laptop that cannot be traced to you, from a yard sale in an unfamiliar neighborhood, example given. Park your car away from where you make the purchase. I don’t advise stealing a machine, but that’d work if you’re a competent thief and don’t leave a trail. We know the NSA has arranged to implant computers with bugged software, actual hardware in some cases, and we want a computer that it doesn’t matter if it ‘calls home’ (NSA) when certain red flags might be triggered by materials you might be handling, so onto the next paragraph.

Now, before you even fire the machine up for the first time, you kill the web-cam, a piece of paper taped over it will do just fine. And you disable the microphone and speaker with dummy jacks cut from discarded actual microphones and speakers and epoxy them in place, just to make certain they stay there. Carefully cut them off where the plug extends from the jack, so they are not obvious. Now your ‘leak platform’ is externally blind, deaf and dumb. Shut off bluetooth and search the machine for any GPS integrated software programs and disable them prior to logging on to the internet. DO NOT log into internet from your home.

Now, as to what you might be leaking, consider whether it will be tracked to you on the back-end (source.) Be assured in some environments there will be efforts to do certain things, like identify a computer that had items downloaded onto a memory stick. How will you get these materials safely into the machine you intend to leak from? Old fashioned spy-craft is something to consider, if you do not feel secure in the environment whose security you are breaching. Digital photos of actual documents can be loaded into the computer or paper documents can be scanned into your ‘leak platform’ (in which case you will want an older, untraceable scanner as well.) Use a digital camera that cannot be traced to you. You NEVER want to mail by post any documents, because certain addresses will be flagged by intelligence agencies and your package could be intercepted and might give up fingerprints and/or DNA and other information, such as a the postmark information needed to review security footage at specific locations on certain dates. Also, you’ll want clean paper documents for a scanner (particularly) or digital camera, on account of the possibility you might inadvertently scan your own or your colleagues fingerprints (use gloves when working with any paper documents.)

Ask yourself, is the material you are considering making public, of a demonstrable criminal nature? Or, does it shock the conscience in a sense of egregious violating principles of ethics? COVER YOUR ASS, BECAUSE NO MATTER THE PRECAUTIONS TAKEN, YOU MIGHT GET CAUGHT. Public opinion might save your butt, but don’t count on it, it hasn’t worked for many (if any in recent times.)

Remind yourself, there has been a dearth of leakers that have gone undetected. Has it ever crossed your mind why there has been no ‘deep throat‘ in our present era, and why it seems nearly everyone gets busted? As well, our Federalist Society majority on the USA’s ‘deep state’ owned (corporate board controlled) Supreme Court refused first amendment free press protection to journalism in the case of James Risen in a leaks case. They’ll be after you with everything at the system’s disposal and your chances are not good if you are detected at any level.

Now, you’ve decided, as a patriot, your leak is worth your liberty and/or life and you’ve convinced yourself you’ve stolen the material you wish  to leak without getting caught (let’s hope you’re right) and it’s time to deliver to the journalists, undetected. Perhaps you’d wish to wait three or six months, after you’ve gotten away with the initial theft, it’d be nice if the trail grows cold. Now, your documents are loaded into file that is easy to access, for instance located on the desktop. The email addresses you wish to send the information to are handy. Now, your platform, ‘Dr Leakey’ (named for the archaeologist), is ready. You are in familiar turf (if you are confident), or you have traveled to unfamiliar territory (if you have nerves of steel.) What you need is an open wireless signal you can log onto. When you’ve found this at a cafe or a truckstop or simply a careless person in any neighborhood with unlocked wireless where you can log in from, sitting in your car parked close by (beware of cctv), log on. Create a faked email account (that you will never use again.) Send a first mail (BCC to recipients) to yourself, explaining there is a second mail following with attachments and stating if the recipient does not see the second mail, to look in their spam folder. This mail should pop up and you see it with no failed addresses (from the BCC to the people you are mailing.) Seeing you have a working address on both ends (i.e. functioning mail accounts) and are you still determined to do this, ask yourself, for real? Deep breath, new mail addressed, attached file(s), hit send, have coffee, read the paper, look at ease, normal, belonging in your environment while the what might seem like ages in time pass as the file uploads from the computer and finally the mail goes ‘whoosh’ (in your mind) and the leak is done.

Calmly go on about your day and know how you will be disposing of Dr Leakey. You used him for this one project and will never use him again. Example given, pull out the ram, hard drive goes to the incinerator (an all night campfire will do), break the screen as though Dr Leakey had been accidentally dropped & parts salvaged, and the carcass destination ends in a dumpster (leave no fingerprints.) Same fate for either the digital camera or scanner, if you used these. Be patient for results in the news. You’ve just dropped a bomb from the unseen world and any journalist worth your while, will take time to try and authenticate the information you’ve provided. If they blow it off and never pursue the lead, maybe the gods actually love you. If you’ve gotten away with it, resist temptation to ever do it again. There might be such thing as a charmed life, but it’s probably not yours.

By now, the NSA with its billions of mails to look through, will come up with (at most) someone sent a mail from an account used ONCE, from an computer they never see log in again, over some unsecured random wireless signal in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, example given. Maybe you live in this area of 13 million people or maybe you don’t. This is because you left little in the way of digital fingerprints by finding a way around taking your leak out on a memory stick. Enjoy a quiet laugh and hope you were good enough getting the material out the back-end, with a cold or faint trail, because if you did it right,  they can’t track you from that end. And then erase your personal memory, the one between your ears, because you never wish to tell ANYONE, who you are, in relation to what you’ve done. Meanwhile, study technique along the lines set out by a former FBI agent in the article ‘Spy Craft for Hacks‘ but even there the deck is stacked against you with an ‘agency friendly’, very serious lie by omission; don’t ever have your cell phone (or any mobile device) along on what would then become a misadventure. You’ll need cold nerves, excellent understanding of the environment and good luck, to pull it off. Nothing suffices for this like training and even then, there is no absolute way of doing these things undetected. Luck and competence on your own part and that of your adversaries play into this as well.

Now, to why you probably don’t actually want or need to leak. Firstly, we know it is no longer a conspiracy ‘theory’ (rather conspiracy fact) the USA’s security state is behaving like nazis in relation to surveillance of its own people. We know it’s likely the corporate ‘deep state’ co-opted congress, president and courts are doing little and will do little or nothing to actually change this behavior of the MILITARY elements in control of the runaway NSA, other than at most, wring their hands for public consumption. You don’t need much more knowledge to effect change, if change is going to happen. And if change isn’t happening, what’s the point? If our society’s leading lights are merely content (at most) to shout and stamp their feet like spoiled children at what is going on, rather than shut down ‘business as usual’ along the lines of refusing this criminal hydra legitimacy and attending power, and you don’t see the tectonic plate shift in public outrage necessary to force the issue, there really is no point, people have been cowed into obedience along the lines predicted by both Orwell & Huxley. On the one hand you have Orwell’s conservative sheep bleating on behalf of the ‘security’ state over the terror propaganda all of our western world has been fed. On the other hand you have Huxley’s ‘it’s all about me’ MTV generation could care less about civil liberties beyond freedom to consume, extreme sport, sex, fashion and media ego. With corporate media feeding a public with an education one mile wide and one quarter inch deep (1.6 kilometers wide & 1/2 centimeter deep), the Billy Grahams and Hollywood (our two primary oracles of ‘god’) rule a society which has cannot be saved from itself, because you cannot get the majority’s attention long enough to explain a few sensible things that might change their focus, if not their beliefs, whether puritan or hedonistic. This reflects social engineering via media information operations.

Stepping into/out of this world in relation to spies and leaking is a very dangerous proposition for the untrained. Now is time to work with what we know, not obsess with pursing endless soap operas concerning information on criminals you exercise no real control over. And there is a reason intelligence will want you obsessing (keep reading.)

What can be clearly inferred from open source analysis is, our civil structures have become criminal, out of control, one could go so far as to simply state ‘insane.’ And this is what is distracted from, when obsessed with being outraged at the western democracies ‘voyeurism’ in relation to ‘the people’ who supposedly are in control of our future direction via the principle of ‘consent of the governed.’ The propagandists at the several corporate board controlled intelligence agencies, via co-opted western media, will work to guide and exploit this national tantrum to a (hopefully) calmed down child at the end of the day.

As to the ongoing criminal agendas, one only need look at Chevron (example given) as a corporate gangster poster child and how they’ve managed to buy congress and the courts via Federalist Society owned justices at the top, along the lines of ‘citizens united.’ As for the out of control, one only need look at how ineffective congressional oversight has been, and is presently, in regards to NSA, example given, and there is no change in sight. As for the insane, one only need look at the USA, and it’s lapdog western democracies, pushing Russia to the brink with geo-political capers recently best illustrated in Ukraine, and how western media lies to the public about what is actually going on. Left unchecked, this insanity will certainly lead to VERY BAD subsequent events.

Now, to alternative media and the so-called ‘progressive’ movement, here’s why I wouldn’t touch any online platform, despite examples such as the ‘indomitable’ Guardian subscribe to ‘SecureDrop.’

To begin with, directing leaks to electronics communications platforms is playing to the NSA’s strong point, this area of expertise is SIGINT (signals intelligence), the NSA forte. No matter the encryption expertise involved in any platform’s construction, it is an invitation to play in the lion’s den. Be assured, the NSA (not to mention GCHQ and other intelligence agencies) will assign crack teams to SecureDrop (if ‘securedrop’ were not actually designed by these.)

The Guardian (newspaper) is an organization that would be very deliberately targeted by HUMINT (human intelligence) as a matter of fact. Organizations wishing to penetrate, spy, shape dialogue & policy within the Guardian would include MOSSAD, CIA, DGSE (France) and the British intelligence agencies. Each of these agencies will have a vested interest in covert penetration of the Guardian on account of that paper not having been (yet) entirely monopolized by any one of the Western intelligence agencies (which squabble & compete among themselves.) Anything, were it sent through the pretense of a so-called secure system, is at risk of exposure to clandestine a rabbit warren designed by spies within the Guardian organization. Trust me, they’re there. MOSSAD particularly, would be interested in any information it could potentially acquire, as ‘chits’ to trade to the USA (and other nations) for political favors, as its political currency continues in steady decline over West Bank issues. Just because you possibly managed a ‘secure’ leak (in your dreams) over the SecureDrop system, does not mean you are secure, not by a long shot, because you cannot know how the material might be compromised after it has been put through, let alone whether the system itself is penetrated/designed to identify the source point of the upload and MOSSAD trades YOU in a quid pro quo with another agency.

And now to the odious (closing) aspect of this essay.

“You can imagine my surprise when I read the June 13, 1971, issue of the Sunday New York Times and saw there among the “Pentagon Papers” a number of basic information papers that had been in my own files in the Joint Chiefs of Staff area of the Pentagon. Most of the papers of that period had been source documents from which I had prepared dozens — even hundreds — of briefings, for all kinds of projects, to be given to top Pentagon officers. Not only had many of those papers been in my files, but I had either written many of them myself or had written certain of the source documents used by the men who did.

“Many people have been so concerned about what has been happening to our Government that they have dedicated themselves to investigating and exposing its evils. Unfortunately, a number of these writers have been dupes of those cleverer than they or with sinister reasons for concealing knowledge. They have written what they thought was the truth, only to find out (if they ever did find out) that they had been fed a lot of contrived cover stories and just plain hogwash

“In the hands of Allen Dulles, “secrecy” was simply a chameleon device to be used as he saw fit and to be applied to lesser men according to his schemes. It is quite fantastic to find people like Daniel Ellsberg being charged with leaking official secrets simply because the label on the piece of paper said “TOP SECRET,” when the substance of many of the words written on those same papers was patently untrue and no more than a cover story. Except for the fact that they were official “lies”, these papers had no basis in fact, and therefore no basis to be graded TOP SECRET or any other degree of classification

“Any reader of the “Pentagon Papers” should be warned that although they were commissioned on June 17, 1967, by the Secretary of Defense as “the history of United States involvement in Vietnam from World War II [Sept 2, 1945] to the present” [1968], they are unreliable, inaccurate and marred by serious omissions. They are a contrived history, at best, even though they were written by a selected Task Force under Pentagon leadership” -Pentagon liaison to the CIA, L. Fletcher Prouty

In fact the so-called ‘Pentagon Papers’ were intended to deflect attention from the CIA and onto the military, concerning policy failures in Vietnam.

Open source analysis profiles (STRONGLY) Daniel Ellsberg as an intelligence agency officer, almost certainly CIA. What the CIA edits at wikipedia doesn’t inform of, when the public is fed

“Ellsberg served in the Pentagon from August 1964 under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (and, in fact, was on duty on the evening of the Gulf of Tonkin incident, reporting the incident to McNamara). He then served for two years in Vietnam working for General Edward Lansdale as a civilian in the State Department”

…is Ellsberg’s work for Edward Lansdale at Department of State has CIA information operations written all over it. One of CIA’s big tasks is information operations or social engineering via psychological manipulation of entire populations. And Ellsberg was working with one of the CIA’s true big shots in this area of intelligence expertise. The ultimate purpose of the ‘Pentagon Papers’ leak was information operations (social engineering) to shield the CIA from public accountability for the massive intelligence & related policy failures in Vietnam; by shifting public focus onto the Pentagon. The CIA was expendable and could have been disbanded. The Pentagon could not be done away with.

“That I had written parts of some of them proves that they were not genuine Pentagon papers, because my work at that time was devoted to support of the CIA” -L Fletcher Prouty

Colonel Prouty blew the whistle on the CIA & Ellsberg over 40 years ago. Colonel Prouty’s work, which has borne the test of time, is buried, meanwhile, whistle-blower ‘legend’ Ellsberg invites leakers into the SecureDrop cobra’s lair… as you actually believe the initial SecureDrop developer, Aaron Schwartz, hanged himself (and his co-developer’ ‘died’ after that.) Probably, it’s a case of, examples given, Gary Webb shot himself in the head TWICE (Superman could do that.) It’s an old model, for instance when Eli Black had stepped into longtime CIA turf at United Fruit, he was framed with an SEC investigation and a subsequently ‘depressed’ Eli broke an industrial strength skyscraper window with his briefcase and ‘jumped’ 44 floors from his office building. No-no, the CIA liaised generals at NSA won’t be allowing certain activities to move forward unimpeded. The only question with ‘SecureDrop’ is, how it has been compromised (since inception or when the source code was stolen, likely about the time Schwartz ‘hanged’ himself.)

Daniel Ellsberg has been a champion of WikiLeaks which has employed SecureDrop via tor (tor is a USA military intelligence tool.)

Ellsberg has promoted SecureDrop for Exposefacts.org.

Has it ever occurred to anyone, as to why, no one has ever outed a ‘Kim Philby‘ type character embedded in the progressive and peace movements, as though intelligence operatives would never caper within that playground? I’ll name you one. Daniel Ellsberg.

“From the beginning, the Pentagon Papers were a compilation of documents designed to paint President John F. Kennedy as the villain of the story, and to shield the role of the CIA” L Fletcher Prouty

Meanwhile, so-called ‘SecureDrop’ has been leaking the leakers identities for years.

 

This is a majorly rewritten, updated & re-titled piece from 2014 –

 

related at this site:

Pentagon Papers, CIA and the Lies of Daniel Ellsberg

The Smelly Side of Wikileaks

The NSA’s Egregious Liar: Why This Definition Should Matter

further reading:

[1] https://hiddenhistorycenter.org/colonel-l-fletcher-prouty-on-the-pentagon-papers/

[2] https://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers

[3] https://ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/

[4] https://unredacted.com/2014/01/17/the-top-10-surveillance-lies-edward-snowdens-leaks-shed-heat-and-light-on/

 

*

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

A Sociopaths & Democracy Project

All original work and art © copyright by Ronald Thomas West; for profit and mass paper media redistribution prohibited

 

 

Read in English | Čitajte na srpskom

Король обращается к своему советнику и задаёт вопрос:

«Лига Европы предлагает нам присоединиться к их экономическому альянсу и принять их деньги. Каковы преимущества по сравнению с недостатками?»

Советник, шпион Лиги Европы, чувствовал себя неуютно, уж точно не мог говорить свободно. Чтобы избежать вопроса, он сказал:

«Спросим шута»

Шут:

«Коррумпированный королевский бухгалтер увеличивает сумму с 2000 до 3000 и называет это увеличением на 50%. Затем этот же человек сокращает сумму 3000 вдвое, чтобы получить 1500, и это называется 50% -ным уменьшением.

Но увеличенное на 50% число можно сократить на 33-1/3%, чтобы получить первоначальную сумму в 2000. Вдруг, как по волшебству, исчезает 500 – куда они делись?

Увеличение на 50% не может быть отменено и равно 50% -ному уменьшению этой проблемы без обмана. Это ничем не отличается от изменения метода, при котором уменьшение 3000 на 50% равно 1500, а увеличение 1500 на 50% равно 2250; при этом для того, чтобы процентные соотношения совпадали в действительности, и чтобы не было лжи в числах, необходимо, чтобы 50% равнялось 1500, потому что на самом деле сумма 1500 становится ровно 50% от 3000.

Разве более честный подход не требовал бы работать только с конечными суммами фактических результатов, когда 2000 могут стать 3000 только на 33-1/3 процента больше, чем было 2000, став 3000? В этом случае снижение на 50 % может фактически составить 1500 без лжи.

Если действительно, в практическом применении 50 % должны привести нас к 3000 из 1500, но 50 % помечены как 750, достигая 2250, в чей карман ушли остальные 750? Является ли проблема только семантикой? Или математика учёта «Трансцендентной коррупции» Лиги Европы работает аналогично методу, определяемому этой проблемой, когда, например, суммы фиатных валют в обращении растут и уменьшаются или государственные налоговые платежи появляются и исчезают? «Присвоение процентных значений» в математике Лиги Европы, по-видимому, позволяет практически любому мошенничеству, представленному королю и его народу, стать де-факто «свершившимся фактом» «добросовестно», независимо от расположения суммы»

Король:

«Кто за это в ответе?!»

Шут:

«Это шпионы Лиги Европы, Ваше Величество, как они сами ясно сообщают вам в заявлении об отказе от ответственности в своих многочисленных отчётах: «Суждения не означают, что у нас есть доказательства, подтверждающие факт. Оценки основаны на собранной информации, которая часто бывает неполной или фрагментарной, а также на логике, аргументации и прецедентах»»

Король с убийственным выражением лица смотрит на советника…

(c) 2021 Рональд Томас Уэст, в коммерческих целях, и распространение средств массовой информации запрещено.

By Patrick Armstrong

First published Strategic Culture Foundation, in Spanish, picked up by What Really Happened,

Probably the first US-plotted “colour revolution” was the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893. The Hawaiian Islands had been united in the early 1800s and were internationally recognised as an independent country, but the native Polynesians had been outnumbered by outsiders who had acquired a good deal of the land and devoted it to growing sugar. The USA was the principal market for the sugar but, when domestic sugar producers prevailed upon Washington to impose a tariff, the producers in Hawaii saw their wealth threatened. The coup overthrew the Queen, proclaimed a republic and a few years later Hawaii became a US territory and the sugar market was saved. None of this was overtly stated in justification, of course: the coup, like later “colour revolutions”, was carried out for more highfalutin reasons than mere greed. A threat was “discovered”, “public safety is menaced, lives and property are in peril”, a committee of safety formed, simulated mass meetings were held. Conveniently a US Navy ship was in harbour and troops came ashore “to secure the safety” etc etc. The Navy’s presence was not a coincidence because the US President and Secretary of State were in agreement with the conspiracy and the US diplomatic representative, while pretending neutrality, was an active participant. All done quickly and the coup leaders proclaimed themselves to be the new provisional government. Wholly and obviously fake – there was no disorder at all and the “committee of public safety” was made up of sugar barons and their flunkeys – but it stands as a historically significant event because it was the first crude attempt at something to be perfected in later years.

A Congressional report in 1894 decided that everything was perfectly perfect but a century later the US Congress passed the “apology resolution” for the coup. Who can say that the Rules-Based International Order is not real after that? Has Putin or Xi ever apologised for anything he didn’t apologise for earlier?

The most recent successful “colour revolution” occurred in Ukraine in 2013-2014. Enter the “Non-Government” Organisations – the non-government part is a lie but they are certainly well organised; they prepare the way. Victoria Nuland, then Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, admitted to spending five billion dollars to “ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine”: an enormous sum for a poor country. (One learns here what has changed since the Hawaiian “colour revolution” 120 years before: 1) the rhetoric is more syrupy 2) it costs more.) She was the John Stevens of the Ukrainian “colour revolution” – sent by the US State Department to hand out the money, make the decisions and direct the performance. And, as the phone intercept proves, to block others from involvement – “fuck the EU”.) I recommend taking the time to listen to some of Nuland’s speech here to see just how sugary the cover talk for these “colour revolutions” has become – democracy, human rights, freedom, reforms, Europe; the caravan of “Western values” is chained to the juggernaut of greed and power. None of these formerly estimable values are visible in today’s Ukraine; but the interests of Ukrainians (or Hawaiians) were never the point of “colour revolutions”: the sugar barons wanted to keep their entry into the US market, Washington wanted to make trouble for Russia and the US Navy wanted a base in Crimea.

But the day of “colour revolution” seems to be running out. The mechanics are noticed and countered. Observe, for example, the moment in this video of a protest in Sevastopol when the commenter – who had seen it before on the Maidan – points out the carefully spaced people, wearing red so they can recognise each other, directing the supposedly genuine and spontaneous protest. The organisers were trying to make the Crimean Tatar issue a fighting cause. (I wonder, by the way, how many consumers of the Western “news” media think the Tatars are autochthonous?) I well remember this documentary because it was the first time I saw the people on the receiving end of a “colour revolution” getting ahead of the organisers; up to this moment they had been reacting, always wrongly and too late. But many of the security forces in Crimea in 2014 had been on the Maidan and had ample opportunity to observe how “spontaneity” is organised.

The authorities and their security services are becoming proactive and are using social media – a good example was the recording of the organisers of the Hong Kong protests meeting with a US Embassy official. And we have the recording of one of Navalniy’s associates asking for money from a UK Embassy official; not, he assured the official, “a big amount of money for people who have billions at stake”. Sometimes it’s fortuitous and not the result of planning by the target’s security services. A civil airliner receives a (fake) bomb threat, it lands according to the rules, one of the passengers is a “colour revolution” operative, they arrest him, he sings. There is still some mystery in the Protasevich story, but the Western version is certainly not true.

And when it’s over and failed, Washington casually dismisses its tools. Where is Yushchenko today? Once the darling of the “Orange Revolution” in Kiev, today he is a non-person. Saakashvili, re-used and failed again in Ukraine, is in prison in Tbilisi today. No fuss is made about him. Áñez is in jail, Protasevich forgotten. We’ve seen many West-leaning democratic saviours come and go in Russia – Berezovskiy, Khodorkovskiy and Pussy Riot are in the past; today it’s Navalniy but he’s probably passed his best-before date. Just props in the “colour revolution” theatre.

And we come to another secret of beating the “colour revolution” – tough it out. The Emperor Alexander told the French Ambassador that Napoleon’s enemies had given up too soon, he, on the other hand, would go to Kamchatka if need be. He went to Paris instead. Maduro still sits in the presidential office in Caracas, Guaidó is reduced to begging; Brussels has stopped pretending but Washington holds fast to the delusion. Lukashenka remains. Beijing toughed it out in Hong Kong. On the contrary, in Georgia (“Rose Revolution“) Shevardnadze was unwilling to use force and in Kiev (“Orange Revolution” and Maidan) Yanukovych was unwilling to use force. Not, of course that they weren’t blamed anyway by the Western propaganda apparatus (which was unashamed to call these scenes in Kiev and Hong Kong “peaceful” and never wondered where all the orange tents came from). All designed of course, to incite a violent reaction by the authorities which would be packaged by the complaisant Western media as violence against peaceful protesters. Not at all the same thing, of course, in the Western “human rights” Rules-Based International Order construction, as anything going on in Melbourne, or Paris, or London. To a degree, “colour revolutions” are waiting games and the incumbent, if he keeps his nerve, has certain advantages.

But probably the strongest prophylactic against a “colour revolution” is to prevent it from starting. And here it is necessary to drive out the foreign “Non Government” Organisations before they get established. There will, of course, be much protest from the West but it is important for the targets to understand that their press coverage in the West is and always will be negative, no matter what they do, say or argue. It’s propaganda, it’s not supposed to be fact-based. And it’s often amusingly repetitive – the Western propagandists are too lazy and too contemptuous of their audience not to recycle yesterday’s panics. For example: remember when Russia hacked the Vermont power grid in 2016? this time it’s “an angry Chinese President Xi Jinping” shutting down Canadian power plants. Sometimes it’s sloppily idiotic: CNN tells us that Russia, China and Iran are all hacking away at the US election system; it then goes on to say that Russia likes Trump and China likes Biden; Therefore, as Sherlock Holmes would conclude, CNN must believe that that Iran decided the outcome. The target should not worry about Western coverage – if you’re today’s target, all coverage will negative. Vide contemporary excitement over “violations of Taiwan’s airspace” without mentioning this simultaneous event. Facts don’t matter: the Panama Papers were about Putin except that they didn’t mention him and therefore they must have been by Putin. The Pandora Papers give us the re-run.

Former successes – in recent times, Ukraine twice, Georgia – are becoming failures: Hong Kong, Venezuela and Belarus. The targets have learned how to counter the attacks. The essential rules for defeating “colour revolutions” are:

  1. They come from outside. So cut out the outsiders and get rid of the foreign “Non-Government” Organisations. This is probably the most important preventative: the “colour revolution” operators were quite unhindered in, for example, Ukraine.
  2. Remember Alexander’s advice: don’t give up too soon. Maduro and Lukashenka are still there. To say nothing of Russia, China and Iran.
  3. Don’t be afraid that you’ll be blamed: you will be anyway. The Western propaganda machine is not interested in facts.
  4. Be tough. There’s a rhythm to these things; if you interrupt them, its hard for them to get back on track.
  5. Be patient, as we saw in Hong Kong, the outrage is mostly artificial and will run out of steam.
  6. Learn the techniques of how they’re done, watch for them and counter them.
  7. And finally: time is on your side. The West is not getting stronger. What the neocons call “the axis of revisionists” is.

 

Visit Patrick Armstrong’s website

*

%d bloggers like this: