“Ambassador Victoria Nuland assumed her position as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs on September 18, 2013. As Assistant Secretary she is responsible for diplomatic relations with 50 countries in Europe and Eurasia, as well as with NATO, the European Union and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Previously, Ambassador Nuland served as State Department Spokesperson” –Department of State’s Nuland bio, 23 April 2015

What is well known is, the Department of State and the CIA have always been Siamese twins. What is less known is, the American military officer corps has long rivaled (and these days surpasses) the Department of State as cover for CIA officers. What is interesting about this just now is, is a shuffle between the Pentagon, Department of State and the White House. Jen Psaki goes to the White House to become Communications Director, recently released Department of Defense Spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby moves over to the Department of State and former CIA spokeswoman Marie Harf will no doubt stay on at Department of State to get John Kirby’s feet on the ground and cover Iran.

Why this is interesting is the portrait it paints insofar as information management, and who plays where in the executive branch. Noting Victoria Nuland’s former employ as Department of State spokeswoman prior to her becoming the USA’s information engineering front for the Maidan coup in Ukraine, and noting Jen Psaki’s role at State and seeing John Kirby move into her role, let’s look at the sum of this in the context of Marie Harf:

“During the 2012 election, Ms. Harf was responsible for all national security and foreign policy issues on President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign. In this role, Ms. Harf developed and implemented the campaign’s national security policy and communications strategy, and she served as a press spokesperson on national security issues. Ms. Harf was also a member of President Obama’s debate preparation team for the Town Hall and Foreign Policy debates.

“Prior to joining President Obama’s re-election campaign, Ms. Harf was the Central Intelligence Agency’s Media Spokesperson. She crafted the CIA’s media strategy on a wide range of sensitive national security and intelligence topics.

“Ms. Harf began her federal government career in the CIA’s Directorate of Intelligence, where she was an analyst on Middle East leadership issues. She produced finished intelligence products — including items for the President’s Daily Brief — on top foreign policy priorities, providing insight and context while identifying risks and opportunities for the United States” -Department of State Harf bio, 23 April 2015

As well, noting Jen Psaki worked on both Obama’s election campaigns, and all of the named personalities are bald, professional liars (it helps they all profile as sociopaths) managing geopolitical myths in highly engineered media campaign environment, what stands out is, excepting Obama, all have worked in the role of Department of State spokesperson.

Nuland’s geopolitical myth engineering for the tv cameras from the Maidan in Kiev coupled to her leaked (intercepted phone) conversation dictating the precise formation of the incoming coup d’état government coupled to the revelation the Maidan snipers were a CIA false flag operation hosted by Poland, gives us some insights as to the career path track the Department of State spokesperson position points to. In the larger context, the personalities, all of them, profile as highly trained CIA operatives under cover of information professionals, but that is to say an ‘open’ cover where they are actually working in the field of their expertise as information specialists; however geopolitical engineering via information operations or ‘psyops.’ Only it’s called ‘spokesperson.’

The problem with this is obvious; these are not psyops aimed at enemy states but rather are aimed at the western press and the American people particularly. Victoria Nuland in a lead thespian role at the center of a coup d’état based on a CIA false flag operation, with Jen Psaki, Marie Harf and John Kirby all playing coordinated, supporting roles in an information operation aimed at the American people to convince them of the rightness of engaging Russia in related hostilities, is seriously anti-democratic. It is also against the law and violates fundamental constitutional principles.

This brings us now to the boss at the top of the food chain. Barack Obama is not only exceedingly close to career CIA operative & Director John Brennan, he has large gaps in his disingenuous biography. There is little question his mother was an American intelligence officer. And there is little question he had been mentored, as a younger man, by CIA front companies or closely associated businesses. During his tenure as our national executive, Obama has empowered the United States intelligence apparatus like none before him. Insofar as profiling a professionally trained liar, Obama’s skill would appear sublime. None better have preceded him; with pulling  the wool over the eyes of the Black communities of America and Africa, combined. In the larger spectrum Obama has given up our citizens’ rights to a degree none other would dare and without real or serious or effective opposition within the American political community. Meanwhile, going to the intended outcome in Ukraine, Obama’s strategies mirror the neo-liberal hate-monger Zbigniew Brzezinski’s ‘Grand Chessboard’ anti-Russia strategies closely. This while Victoria Nuland reports to Chevron and Exxon-Mobil that 5 billion USA tax dollars have been invested to bring the elected Kiev government to point of coup d’état. This is little different to the overthrow of the Iran government by the CIA in 1953, on behalf of big oil. It does well to mention here, an insider sobriquet for CIA is “Corporate America.”

The question the American people need, or better said, deserve the opportunity to respond  to is; do you accept the National Security Act of 1947 handed the USA executive to corporate America, lock, stock & barrel, via their intelligence agency minions? Is this a legitimate exercise of the principles of American democracy? Directly stemming from this factual circumstance, does anyone believe it is a legitimate exercise of democracy when sleight-of-hand geopolitical engineering requires a mass deceit be perpetrated on the electorate; where the picture drawn for you via the institutions of State is not remotely similar to reality? That innocents can be murdered in such a way as to cast blame on another innocent party .. where the purpose of the vile act is to stir your indignation against a 3rd innocent party and justify in your mind further acts of hostility against those very innocents, even to war? Who, you might ask, would be so insane? The Nazis did similar despicable things, and NATO is on a nearly identical path as I write this. And they’re doing it with the trained, professional, criminal brilliance of Obama, Nuland, Psaki, Harf and Kirby; brought to you courtesy of the CIA:

CIA

Deep State Exposés

Ukraine for Dummies

*