Archives for posts with tag: Slavoj Žižek

Brabonjak na engleskom dingleberry /ˈdɪŋɡ(ə)lbɛri/
im. (mn. dingleberries) sleng, vulg.
1 loptica govneta zakačena za dlake oko anusa kod životinje ili čoveka.
2 neformalno: budalasta ili nesposobna osoba: Taj blentavi brabonjak Slavoj Žižek koji manifestuje svoj narcizam u Lakanovom ogledalu.
POREKLO: nem. ding od Hegelovog „Ding-an-sich“ ili „stvar kao takva“+ berry. Der Narzisst Slavoj Žižek manifestiert sein Scheißkerl im Spiegel

„Žižekovo razumevanje političkog uverenja po uzoru je na Lakanovo shvatanje transfera u psihoanalizi. Uverenje ili „pretpostavka“ analizirane osobe u psihoanalizi je da Onaj drugi (njegov analitičar) zna značenje njegovih simptoma. Ovo je, očigledno, lažno verovanje, na samom početku analitičkog procesa

Drugim rečima, filozofski govoreći, oni koji se podvrgavaju analizi ne mogu znati razliku između sopstvene zadnjice i jednog ili drugog kraja šupljeg trupca.

Ali, tek držanjem ovog lažnog uverenja o analitičaru, posao analize može da se nastavi, a transferno uverenje može postati istinito (kada analitičar zaista postane sposoban da protumači simptome). Žižek tvrdi da je ova neobična intersubjektivna ili dijalektička logika verovanja u kliničku psihoanalizu isto [ono] što karakteriše politička uverenja ljudi“

Dakle, na kraju političkog „analitičkog“ procesa, analitičar Žižek je „Onaj drugi“ u „Ogledalu“ … „Izvođač Političkog Felacija Tevtoncima“ ili „IPFT“ (zvuči kao mačije šištanje), takođe poznatog kao „scheizkerl sindrom“ koji karakterišu međugeneracijski, psihološki brabonjci nasleđeni od francuskog Višijevskog lekara Lakana i ustajalog leša Hegelovog dela.

Pomalo je vijugav put kojim pratimo Žižekov slovenački kulturni zagrljaj Martina Lutera i Luterovih predaka (nemačko katoličanstvo) preko Francuske, ali zapravo nije teško.

Neofrojdovski junak Slavoja Žižeka, Žak Lakan, pomalo neprijatno miriše na Višijevsku Francusku. Tokom nacističke okupacije Pariza, čini se da je Lakan i dalje radio kao terapeut u vojnoj bolnici Val-de-Gras, a istovremeno, njegova privatna praksa se neprekidno odvijala bez ometanja i uznemiravanja. Čovek se samo može zapitati da li je ili, kada i kako je, maršal Peten ili možda Klaus Barbi predstavljen kao Lakanov „Onaj drugi“ u njegovoj psihijatrijskoj praksi.

Da li bi ovo trebalo da ukaže na temelj filozofije koja je neiskrena? Pa, to bi bilo „otvoreno za tumačenje“, jer je Lakan bio dovoljno pronicljiv da istakne da evropska tradicija socijalne razvojne psihologije podrazumeva stvaranje narcisa u svakom detetu sa njegovim konceptom „Ogledala“. Naravno, posledični „Onaj drugi“ koji se projektuje u čovekovo svakodnevno okruženje i susrete, zapravo je naknadna nesposobnost evropskog pojedinca (uključujući i Lakana) da shvati da bi mogla postojati bilo koja razumljiva stvarnost za samo jedan stepen izvan granica sopstvene percepcije sebe u granicama od 2 ili 3 stepena. Ukratko: „Ljudi toliko puni sebe su previše socijalno glupi da bi shvatili da su oblikovani u nešto krajnje glupo.“

Ovo se odnosi na Lakanovu vezu sa Džejmsom Džojsom; intelektualno nepošteni filozofi su poput buva koje se hrane na trbuhu kuje, u onim boemskim kafanama iz kojih nisu izbijali (iz sadašnje ere) iznureni klingonski pesnici Robert Blaj, leš Kena Kizija i Tom Robins (između ostalih). Ovu savremenu kafansku scenu mogli bismo nazvati post -intelektualni-pobedi-svoje-meso-izam. Evo Robinsovog pogleda na Džojsovu književnu monstruoznost „Fineganovog bdenja“

„Jezik u njemu je neverovatan. Postoji toliko mnogo slojeva igre rečima i referenci na mitologiju i istoriju. Ipak, to je najrealističniji roman ikad napisan. Upravo zbog toga je tako nečitljiv. Napisao je tu knjigu na način kako deluje i ljudski um. Inteligentan, znatiželjan um. A upravo je takva i svest. Nije linearna. Jedna stvar nagomilana na drugu. I sve vrste unakrsnih referenci. A on to dovodi do krajnosti. Nikada nije postojala takva knjiga i mislim da nikada neće biti još jedne takve knjige. I to je apsolutno monumentalno ljudsko dostignuće. Ali vrlo je teško čitati “

Robins je, takođe, između ostalog rekao:

„Potičem iz dugog niza propovednika i policajaca. Sada je opštepoznato da su policajci urođeni lažovi, a evanđelisti provode život pričajući fantastične priče na takav način da inače racionalne ljude uvere da su stvarne. Dakle, pretpostavljam da sam prirodno stekao svoje narativne sklonosti ”

Podelite prvi pasus sa drugim pasusom i pretpostavljam da će čitalac razumeti kompulzivnog lažova (ili „mrtvog pesnika“, u ovom slučaju) razumevajući Džojsa, dok je opijen LSD-om nalik na šarlatana (Lakana), koji prepisuje Frojda da bi postigao da se proslavi tvrdnjom da stvara nešto smisleno od besmislica. Narcisoidnost nikada nije poznavala veći fond talenata od onih koji tvrde da mogu razumno pročitati ono što se ne može razumno pročitati, ili smisleno ostvariti ono što se ne može smisleno ostvariti ili, uopšte, imati bilo kakav smisao onoga što je utvrđeno kao očigledna besmislica, ali to je zapadnjačka igra filozofa; zatrpavanje protivrečnosti svoje kulture u složenom, preopširnom izlaganju: tako da se te protivrečnosti nikada ne sretnu licem u lice. Ovo nas dovodi do kulturnog mentaliteta Slovenaca.

Sloven koji oponaša Nemca (kad to nije osmišljena komedija) je poput pačuka koji oponaša ideologiju skinhedsa; osim što je kulturno neprijateljstvo staro milenijumima i usađeno u DNK. Ovaj fenomen nije ništa drugo do kosmička satira izlivena u kalupu takozvanog „Stokholmskog sindroma“. A kada je to čitav jedan narod, to se može opisati samo kao parodija „kraja sveta“; narod, čiji je jezik bliski rođak staroslovenskog i koji ima puno značajnih Slovena, otvoreno se opredelio kao rasni „Untermensch“, podložan klanju prema nemačkoj kulturološkoj definiciji, u ne tako davnoj prošlosti (ne zaboravimo da projekat denacifikacije nije nikad sproveden u Adenauerovoj posleratnoj Nemačkoj, naprotiv, mnogi nacisti su „rehabilitovani“ ako se taj izraz može primeniti na organizaciju Gelen koja je postala tajna špijunska služba Nemačke), pak slovenački filozof trči u zagrljaj potomstva Martina Luthera i Hegelov „idealizam“. Hajde da se malo zabavimo u ovom formatu podsvesne kulturne metafore ili bajke:

Ova „postmoderna tevtonska bajkovita vizija“ mogla bi se nazvati „gasni napad“, gde bi u stvari „gasni napad“, drugačije od nacističkog koršćenja Ciklona B, podižući agoniju bolova izazvanih gasom na novi filozofski nivo, mogao biti jednako smrtonosan, tihi prdež, u uljudnom društvu. Na primer, niko ne bi želeo da vređa kuvanje nečije majke, ali u prethodnoj eri, nekada davno, izvesna frau Žižek je preuzela na sebe da, subotom uveče, redovno priprema za večeru jelo od šunke i velikog belog pasulja, baš uoči nedeljnih jutara, kada je malog Slavoja, paradnim korakom kao dobrog vojnika, otac vodio u crkvu.

Sada, iz nekog razloga, dogodilo se i jedno i drugo; mali Slavoj je žudeo za ovom poslasticom, ali se on NIJE svideo poslastici. Ali ovu nesrećnu telesnu disonancu, zasnovanu na biološkom principu, koja se uveliko dešavala, a da je oni veliki porodični autoriteti nisu otkrili. To je bilo zato što bi roditelji malog Slavoja odlazili na glavnu crkvenu službu, gde bi se predavanja o svemogućem odvijala na akademski način, dostojan kule od slonovače, dok bi puki podređeni kućni babuni, poput malog Slavoja, bili izdvojeni na „obuku“ u pravilnom luteranskom stilu… u nešto unapred stvorenom shvatanju budućeg raja gde deci nije dozvoljeno prisustvo u društvu dešavanja i / ili zbivanja odraslih, što takoreći ima svoje korene u Hegelovom shvatanju podele.

Tako se desilo, ovaj nesrećni mali Slavoj, više puta (na časovima zaredom i više puta na času), bio je nalik na mašinu koja je istiskivala veoma vlažne prdeže, krajnje tihe sorte i čija bi aroma topila metal poput topionice. Ili, srušila zgradu poput prirodnog gasa koji je iscurio i pronašao pilot svetlo grejača. Prdeži nalik na visoko sumporne ispusne vulkanske gasove, provučeni kroz gomilu svežeg stajskog đubriva njegovog rođaka, sakupljenog iz torova za ovce. Glave su padale na stolove, dečije oči su suzile, nastavnik bi poprimio zastakljen izgled, a tokom predugih pauza remetili su se planovi časova.

Budući da hegelovsko potomstvo Martina Luthera nikada ne govori ono što im je iskreno na umu kad je tema sramotna, vulgarna, a prdeži su sramotne, vulgarne teme u bilo kom nemačkom ili pseudo-nemačkom društvu, ova noćna mora je trajala, iz nedelje u nedelju, a vrata male učionice nisu mogla da budu čak ni odškrinuta, da uđe malo svežeg vazduha, jer bi ovo bilo prećutno priznanje da postoji neugodan problem.

Stoga, to se nastavljalo sve dok, iz nekog razloga (nijedan odrasli instruktor nije više bio voljan da trpi), jednog nedeljnog jutra nije bilo profesora koji bi odvojio decu. Kada se mali Slavoj zatekao kako sedi u glavnoj klupi na crkvenoj službi, sa svojim nominalno slovenskim, ali „teutonizovanim“ odraslim nadzornicima, usledila je preterana posledična reakcija; šunka i veliki beli pasulj bili su uzrok prelaska na marksizam u kući malog Slavoja, ali bilo je prekasno da se ostavi trajan utisak, već je samo preneta određena aroma u buduću analitičku političku filozofiju!

„Moralna pouka“ ove priče bila bi: Ako osetite miris, istražite ga, pre nego što vam okolnosti nalažu da morate da dišete na usta i okusite ga.

Tako je i bilo, mali Slavoj, uprkos svojoj zaluđenosti Višijevskim Lakanom i kulturnom indoktrinacijom u „idealnoj“ tradiciji tevtonskog Hegela, izrastao je u kontradiktornog, tevtonski oblikovanog, propagandnog licemera u ruskom vlasništvu; čijih nekoliko današnjih filozofskih brabonjaka uključuje „Asanžmaniju“, kojoj su jedino dorasli, samo određeni, predadolescentni obožavaoci Bitlsa Pola:

1 - 1

^ Jungova Anima Slavoja Žižeka ^

*

Serbia/Srbija

© 2021 Ronald Tomas Vest (Ronald Thomas West)

 

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Čitajte na srpskom

dingleberry |ˈdiNGəlˌberē|
noun (pl. dingleberries) vulgar slang
1 a small shit-ball attached to the anal hair of an animal or man.
2 informal a foolish or inept person: That clueless dingleberry Slavoj Žižek manifest his narcissism in the mirror of Lacan
ORIGIN: German ding from Hegel’s ‘Ding-an-sich’ or ‘a thing as such’ + berry. Der Narzisst Slavoj Žižek manifestiert sein Scheißkerl im Spiegel

“Žižek’s understanding of political belief is modelled on Lacan’s understanding of transference in psychoanalysis. The belief or “supposition” of the analysand in psychoanalysis is that the Other (his analyst) knows the meaning of his symptoms. This is obviously a false belief, at the start of the analytic process…

In other words, philosophically speaking, those subjecting themselves to analysis cannot know the difference between their own butt-hole and either end of a hollow log.

…but it is only through holding this false belief about the analyst that the work of analysis can proceed, and the transferential belief can become true (when the analyst does become able to interpret the symptoms). Žižek argues that this strange intersubjective or dialectical logic of belief in clinical psychoanalysis also [is] what characterizes peoples’ political beliefs”

So, at the end of the political ‘analytic’ process, analyst Žižek is the ‘Other’ in the ‘Mirror’ … a ‘Performer of Political Fellatio Upon Teutons’ or a ‘PPFUT’ (sounds like a cat’s hiss) a.k.a. suffers from ‘scheizkerl syndrome’ typified by intergenerational, psychological dingleberries inherited from France’s Vichy practitioner Lacan & the stale corpse of Hegel’s work.

It is a bit roundabout, tracing Žižek’s Slovenian cultural embrace of Martin Luther and Luther’s forbears (German Catholicism) via France, but not really difficult.

Slavoj Žižek’s neo-Freudian hero, Jacques Lacan, smells a bit untidily of Vichy France. During the Nazi occupation of Paris, it would appear Lacan kept his employ as a therapist at Val-de-Grace military hospital, as well, his private practice continued unmolested-uninterrupted. One can only wonder whether or, when and how, Marshal Petain, or perhaps Klaus Barbie, presented as Lacan’s ‘Other’ in his psychiatric practice. Should this point to a foundation for a philosophy that is dishonest? Well, that would be ‘open to interpretation’ in that Lacan was astute enough to point out the European tradition of social-developmental psychology is to create a narcissist in every child with his concept of ‘Mirror.’ Of course the consequent ‘Other’ one projects into one’s everyday surroundings & encounters, is actually the subsequent inability of the European individual (Lacan included) to grasp there could be any comprehensible reality a single degree beyond the 2 or 3 degree borders of their own perception of self. In short: ‘People so full of themselves they are too socially stupid to understand they’ve been shaped into something utterly stupid.’

This goes to Lacan’s relationship with James Joyce; intellectually dishonest philosophers are like fleas nursing at a bitch’s belly in those bohemian cafes populated by (current era) jaded Klingon poets Robert Bly, the corpse of Ken Kesey and, Tom Robbins (among others.) We could call this contemporary cafe scene ‘post-intellectual-beat-your-meat-ism.’ Here is Robbins’ take on the Joyce literary monstrosity “Finnegan’s Wake”

“the language in it is incredible. There’s so many layers of puns and references to mythology and history. But it’s the most realistic novel ever written. Which is exactly why it’s so unreadable. He wrote that book the way that the human mind works. An intelligent, inquiring mind. And that’s just the way consciousness is. It’s not linear. It’s just one thing piled on another. And all kinds of cross references. And he just takes that to an extreme. There’s never been a book like it and I don’t think there ever will be another book like it. And it’s absolutely a monumental human achievement. But it’s very hard to read”

Robbins incidentally has also said:

“I’m descended from a long line of preachers and policemen. Now, it’s common knowledge that cops are congenital liars, and evangelists spend their lives telling fantastic tales in such a way as to convince otherwise rational people that they’re factual. So, I guess I come by my narrative inclinations naturally”

Divide the 1st paragraph by the 2nd paragraph and I expect the reader will understand a compulsive liar (or ‘deadbeat poet’, as the case may be) coming to understand Joyce while high on LSD is only equal to a charlatan (Lacan) rewriting Freud to accomplish making a name for himself whilst claiming he’s making sense of nonsense. Narcissism never knew a greater talent pool than those claiming they can sensibly read what cannot be sensibly read, or sensibly accomplish what cannot be sensibly accomplished or, to make any sense at all of what should have been established as patent nonsense, but that’s the Western philosophers’ game; burying the contradictions of their culture in complex circumlocution by design: so those contradictions never need be met face to face. This brings us to the Slovenes’ cultural mentality.

A Slav imitating a German (when it is not deliberate comedy) is like a pachuco emulating the ideology of a skinhead; except the cultural animosity is both millennia old and ingrained in the DNA. This phenomenon is nothing short of a cosmic satire cast in the mold of the so-called ‘Stockholm Syndrome.” When it is an entire people, it can only be described as an ‘end of times’ parody; a people whose language is a close cousin to Old Church Slavonic and full well knowing Slavs had been openly declared racially ‘Untermensch’, subject to slaughter by German cultural definition, in a not-so-distant past (let’s not forget the denazification project was never carried through in Adenauer’s post-war Germany, to the contrary, many Nazis were ‘rehabilitated’ if that term can be applied to the Gehlen Organization that became Germany’s secret spy service) yet the Slovene philosopher runs to the embrace of Martin Luther’s progeny and Hegel’s ‘idealism.’ Let’s have a bit of fun with this in format of sublimated cultural metaphor or fairy tale:

This ‘post-modern teutonic vision fairy tale’ could be called ‘gas attack’, where in effect a ‘gas attack’, other than Nazi employ of Zyklon B, elevating excruciating gas pains to a new philosophical level, could as easily be deadly, quiet farts, in polite company. For instance, no one should wish to insult anyone’s mother’s cooking but in earlier era a certain Frau Žižek, once upon a time, took it upon herself to habitually prepare ham and large white beans soup for supper, on Saturday evening, prior to little Slavoj’s father goose-stepping him like a good soldier to church on Sunday mornings.

Now, for whatever reasons, it happened both; little Slavoj craved this delicacy and it did NOT like him. But this unfortunate biological-based sort of bodily-dissonance went in large part undetected by those grand phobahs in the family authority. This was because little Slavoj’s parents would be off to the main church service where lessons in the almighty were dispensed in academic fashion worthy of ivory tower, whereas the mere house-baboon type underlings, such as little Slavoj, were shunted off to ‘training’ in proper Lutheran style .. in a somewhat preconceived notion anticipating future paradise where no children are allowed in the company of ‘adult’ goings on and/or doings, the Hegelian-based roots of segregation as it were.

So it was, this unfortunate little Slavoj, repeatedly (in class repeatedly, and repeatedly in class), was a machine pushing out highly humid farts of the utterly silent variety and which aroma would melt metal like a smelter. Or explode a building like a natural gas leak that found the heater’s pilot light. Farts resembling a highly sulfurous volcano vent’s gases forced through his village cousin’s fresh manure pile, gathered from the sheep pens. Heads went to desks, kids’ eyes watered, the class instructor took on a glazed look, during entirely-too-long-pauses, breaking up lesson plans.

Because Martin Luther’s Hegelian progeny never say what is honestly on their mind when the subject matter is embarrassingly prurient, and farts are embarrassingly prurient subject in any German or pseudo-German company, this nightmare went on, week after week and the small classroom’s door could not so much as be left ajar, to let in some fresh air, as this would be a tacit admission there was an embarrassing problem.

Thusly so, it went on until for whatever reason (no adult instructor willing to endure anymore) one Sunday morning there was no professor to segregate the kids; when little Slavoj found himself sitting in the main church service pew with his nominally Slav but ‘teutonized’ adult overseers and there was consequent over-reaction; ham and large white beans soup were the cause of a conversion to Marxism in little Slavoj’s house but it was too late to make a lasting impression, rather only carried a certain aroma over to a future analytic political philosophy!

The ‘moral’ of this story would be: If you can smell it, investigate it, before circumstance dictate you must breathe through your mouth and taste it.

And so it was, little Slavoj, despite his infatuation with Vichy’s Lacan and cultural indoctrination in an ‘ideal’ tradition of the Teuton Hegel, grew up to become the contradiction of a teutonically shaped, Russian owned propaganda prig; whose several present philosophical dingleberries includes the ‘Assangemania’ that had only, ever, been equaled by certain pre-adolescence fans of the Beatle Paul:

1 - 1

^ Slavoj Žižek’s Jungian Anima ^

%d bloggers like this: