Archives for category: Uncategorized

prvi deo                                                                      Read in English

U prvom delu čitalac je upoznat sa psiopima (psihološkim operacijama) u svom „civilnom“ obliku (koje je uveo Edvard Bernajz, zasnovanim na principima svog ujaka Sigmunda Frojda) eufemistički preimenovanim u „odnosi s javnošću“ ili, oblik propagande koji korporacije primenjuju na svojim potrošačima; vrlo slično onome kako obaveštajne agencije dezinformacijama ciljaju na stanovništvo neprijateljskih država. Svaki pristup, bilo da je reč o „civilnom“ ili vojnom, nastoji da manipuliše stanovništvom dalje od njihovih sopstvenih interesa (čak i opstanka) u korist počinilaca propagande. Videvši (u prvom delu) kako pohlepa zapadnih korporativnih oligarha deluje u sistemu koji u suštini „legalizuje“ ono što bi moglo predstavljati nekažnjeno ubistvo koje sponzoriše država, ili ukratko preformulisano: dozvola da se u „vanrednom stanju“ odobri upotreba neistraženog, eksperimentalnog leka koji je veoma skup, Bamlanivimab, na narodu koji ništa ne sluti, kao alternativa za lek za koji se zna da je bezbedan, za koji je dokazano da je delotvoran i jeftin lek, ivermektin, za lečenje kovida, gde se ovaj drugi zataškava u korporativnim medijima, sada, pogledaćemo u sadašnje „odnose s javnošću“ (psiop) koje ukazuju na dezinformacije koje se tiču vakcina (ili takozvanih vakcina).

Semantika i cepidlačenje

Šta je vakcina? Tradicionalno, vakcina se odnosi na upotrebu „inaktiviranog“ (mrtvog) virusa da stimuliše imuni odgovor. Kineska vakcina protiv kovida zasnovana je na ovoj metodologiji, kao i već godinama (decenijama) vakcine protiv gripa. Ovaj metod omogućava imunološkom sistemu da prirodno obavlja svoj posao.

Šta je genska terapija? Tokom poslednje dve decenije, genska terapija podrazumeva petljanje sa samim genetskim materijalom, uključujući iRNK. Ali Moderna poriče da je anti-kovid terapija koja koristi iRNK genska terapija:

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sa Moderninog sajta: „Genska terapija i redigovanje gena menjaju originalne genetske informacije koje nosi svaka ćelija. Cilj je da se sprovede trajna popravka osnovnog genetskog problema, menjanjem defektnog gena. Moderna zauzima drugačiji pristup u rešavanju osnovnog uzroka MMA i ostalih bolesti. iRNK prenosi uputstva deponovana u DNK, kako bi proizvela proteine potrebne svakoj živoj ćeliji. Naš pristup ima za cilj da pomogne telu da proizvede sopstveni protein koji nedostaje ili je defektan. Za razliku od redigovanja gena i genske terapije, iRNK tehnologija ne menja genetske informacije ćelije.“ [1]

E pa, Moderna je lagala. Ne o tehnici, već o činjenici da je istraživanje o iRNK potpadalo decenijama pod rubriku „genska terapija“, što je pokazalo mnoštvo istraživačkih radova u biblioteci Nacionalnog instituta za zdravlje:

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sajta Nacionalnog instituta za zdravlje: „Sintetička informaciona RNK [iRNK] kao alat genske terapije” [2]

Ono što Modernini ljudi koji se bave psiopom žele da mislite (kada neiskreno sužavaju definiciju genske terapije) je, jer oni ne modifikuju DNK, gde se nalaze stvarni geni, da to nije genska terapija. Ali, znate šta? RNK je takođe genetski materijal od značaja kada je podvrgnut korporativnim naučnim (pohlepom motivisanim) prljavim poslovima.

Ne baš savršena (ali adekvatna) analogija bila bi da se DNK sastoji od sedišta koje izdaje uputstva namenjena izgradnji određenih struktura. iRNK je kurir koji dostavlja DNK nacrt gradilišta. Ono što iRNK „genska terapija“ postiže je, da vrši razmenu nacrta, vrlo slično kao kad biste poslali uputstva putem kurirske službe, ali uputstva koja ste poslali nisu ono što je stiglo na predviđeno odredište, jer je neko u kurirskoj službi zamenio original sa izmenjenim setom uputstava. U slučaju Modernine kovid genske terapije (to NIJE vakcina u bilo kom smislu onoga što je „vakcina“ značila pre kovida) problem je (opet, kao i u slučaju Bamlanivimaba u prvom delu), ova terapija je „brzo razrađena“ i primenjena pod ovlašćenjima u vanrednom stanju, kojima se preskaču uobičajene potrebne studije, koje bi zakon nalagao pre odobrenja. Ukratko, dugoročne zdravstvene posledice za ljude koji primaju ovu terapiju nisu poznate ili su preformulisane, psihopate (pohlepom motivisani) korporativni lobisti ($) kupili su, uverili ili na neki drugi način podrili institucije do tačke u kojoj se obični građani vrlo malo razlikuju od laboratorijskih pacova.

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sa sajta Popularna mehanika: „Nakon perioda izuzetno ubrzanog razvoja, dve eksperimentalne vakcine protiv kovida-19 (korona virusa) su gotovo spremne za udarni termin. Obe koriste tehnologiju zvanu informaciona RNK (iRNK), koja je decenijama proučavana i sa kojom su vršeni eksperimenti u različitim oblicima, ali nikada nije korišćena kao komercijalna vakcina.“ [3]

Obratite pažnju na terminologiju „ubrzani razvoj“, „ekperimentalne“ i „nikada nije korišćena“. Ukratko, drugim rečima, neadekvatno proučena i odobrena zbog činjenice „vanrednog stanja“.

Screenshot „Odobrenje za hitnu upotrebu“ iRNK injekcija Moderna i Fajzer sa sajta Administracije za hranu i lekove SAD-a [4]

Nakon prvog dela (suzbijanje efikasnog, jeftinog leka protiv kovida, ivermektina, dok se promoviše neistraženi, eksperimentalni lek, Bamlanivimab), u ovom drugom delu koji sledi, postaje jasno da promovisanje ljudskog zdravlja i brzi oporavak nije primarni cilj institucija zaduženih za suzbijanje takozvane „pandemije“. U stvari, čini se da transcendentna korupcija korača putem ka stanju biološkog terora, koji zapadne vlade sprovode nad sopstvenim građanima, u odsustvu bilo kakvog etičkog samoograničenja koje podrazumeva 1) upotrebu ivermektina kao sigurnog, jeftinog i efikasanog leka protiv kovida i 2) razvijanje klasične vakcine, sa dokazanom, sigurnom metodom zasnovanom na „inaktiviranom“ (mrtvom) virusu kao što su to uradili Kinezi. U međuvremenu, nadajmo se da će Kinezi postupati odgovorno u daljim istraživačkim naporima u pogledu iRNK genske terapije. [5], [6], [7], [8]

Pratite novac

U čijem je interesu korišćenje nacionalnog tela građana kao laboratorijskih pacova?

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sa sajta American Broadcasting Corporation (ABC): „Gejts, koji je investirao u tehnologiju vakcina 2015. godine, naglasio je važnost informacionih RNK (iRNK) vakcina koje će dovesti do završetka ove pandemije i eventualno onih koje će nastupiti u budućnosti.“ [9]

Teško da je Bil Gejts molekularni naučnik. Ono što Bil Gejts zapravo jeste, je narcis. Da li Bil Gejts razume da je iRNK eksperimentalna, nedovoljno proučena tehnika, za koju je vrlo moguće dokazati da je sve osim da je korisna za ljudsko zdravlje dugoročno gledano? Narcis se neće pozabaviti ovim pitanjem. Radi se o tome da se Bil Gejts igra Boga tako što svojim bogatstvom kupuje uticaj koji određuje politiku kovida na globalnom nivou, u okolnostima koje zahtevaju upotrebu eksperimentalnih, nedovoljno proučenih i/ili neispitanih lekova koji se mogu odobriti samo po hitnim ovlašćenjima, jer NISU dokazani kao bezbedni.

Ilustracija (screenshot) Svetske zdravstvene organizacije koja pokazuje da je Gejts Fondacija drugi najveći finansijer (posle SAD-a) SZO za 2018. i 2019. godinu, Gejtsov doprinos premašuje 500 miliona američkih dolara za taj period. [10], [11]

Laži ili propust

U međuvremenu, u Srbiji mediji prećutkuju efikasnost ivermektina, dok je upotreba eksperimentalnog Bamlanivimaba dozvoljena bez upozorenja o njegovom neistraženom / neispitanom statusu (ovaj autor je ove informacije poslao mejlom u nekoliko srpskih redakcija koje imaju izdanja na engleskom jeziku, bez potvrde ili odgovora), a tamo gde ne postoji ispitivanje eksperimentalne prirode injekcije iRNK protiv kovida, takođe dozvoljeno u Srbiji, čini se da postoji element pokvarenog licemerja kada vlast preti zatvorom zbog „lažnih vesti“ u vezi sa vakcinacijom, kada sama država prikriva informacije koje su građanima neophodne za donošenje informisanih odluka; jer je pravo širenje lažnih vesti dozvoliti građanima da steknu utisak da su iRNK „vakcine“ (genske terapije) bezbedne.

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sa sajta Telegrafa: „Oboje [ministarka pravde Maja Popović i ministar zdravlja Zlatibor Lončar] su se pozvali na Krivični zakonik, a on u članu 343 predviđa da onaj ko iznošenjem ili pronošenjem lažnih vesti ili tvrđenja izazove paniku ili teže narušavanje javnog reda ili mira ili osujeti ili značajnije omete sprovođenje odluka i mera državnih organa ili organizacija koje vrše javna ovlašćenja, kazniće se zatvorom od tri meseca do tri godine i novčanom kaznom.“ [12]

U svetlu prethodnog, treba da zaključimo jednim ironičnim zapažanjem; kriminalni nehat se demonstrira širom institucija zaduženih za suzbijanje korona virusa (na globalnom nivou). Da li zbog korporativnih psiopa (propagande) koji manipulišu narcizmom u stanju političke podobnosti motivisane pohlepom ili vrebaju nekompetentnost, transcendentna korupcija je (iznad zakona) vežba nekažnjivosti u korporacijski-kooptiranoj-korumpiranoj državi. Ko treba da se uspaniči? Vođstvo u stanju razotkrivanja?

„Istina se zataškava, ne da bi se zemlja zaštitila od neprijateljskih agenata, već da bi se vlada zaštitila od naroda“ – Roj Hetersli

 

[1] https://www.modernatx.com/about-mrna

[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17007566/

[3] https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a34787908/what-is-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-pfizer-moderna/

[4] https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization#covid19euas

[5] https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2021/04/01/transcendent-corruption-corona-virus-part-one/

[6] https://theconversation.com/how-are-covid-19-vaccines-made-an-expert-explains-155430

[7] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-12/china-vaccine-going-global-with-four-different-efficacy-rates

[8] https://sputniknews.com/asia/202104121082602410-chinese-cdc-director-refutes-reportedly-claiming-chinese-vaccines-have-low-protection-rate/

[9] https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-announces-250-million-covid/story?id=74651890

[10] https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2020-05-29/gates-foundation-donations-to-who-nearly-match-those-from-us-government

[11] http://open.who.int/2018-19/contributors/contributor

[12] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3320196-those-spreading-fake-news-about-vaccines-and-vaccination-face-up-to-5-years-in-prison

 

*

Srbija

*

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Part one HERE                                                      Čitajte na srpskom

In part one the reader was introduced to psyops (psychological operations) in its ‘civilian’ form (pioneered by Edward Bernays based on his uncle Sigmund Freud’s principles) euphemistically renamed ‘public relations’ or, the corporate form of applying propaganda to the consumer; little different to intelligence agencies targeting populations of hostile states with disinformation. Each approach, whether ‘civilian’ or military, seeks to manipulate a populace away from their self interest (even survival) to the benefit of the propaganda’s perpetrators. Having seen (in part one) the greed of western corporate oligarchs operates within a system essentially ‘legalizing’ what could amount to state sponsored murder with impunity, or shortly restated; allows for a ‘state of emergency’ to authorize use of unstudied, experimental drug that is very expensive,  Bamlanivimab, on an unsuspecting populace in lieu of a known to be safe, proving to be effective and inexpensive drug, ivermectin, to treat covid, with the latter suppressed in corporate media, now, we will look at the present ‘public relations’ (psyops) that point to disinformation relevant to vaccines (or so-called vaccines.)

Semantics & Splitting Hairs

What is a vaccine? Traditionally, a vaccine refers to employ of ‘inactivated’ (dead) virus to stimulate an immune response. The Chinese covid vaccine is based on this methodology, as were many years (decades) of flu shots. This method allows the immune system to do its job naturally.

What is gene therapy? For the past two decades, gene therapy refers tinkering with the genetic material itself, including mRNA. But Moderna denies its anti-covid therapy employing mRNA is gene therapy:

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Moderna website: “Gene therapy and gene editing alter the original genetic information each cell carries. The goal is to produce a permanent fix to the underlying genetic problem by changing the defective gene. Moderna is taking a different approach to address the underlying cause of MMA and other diseases. mRNA transfers the instructions stored in DNA to make the proteins required in every living cell. Our approach aims to help the body make its own missing or defective protein. Unlike gene editing and gene therapy, mRNA technology does not change the genetic information of the cell” [1]

Well, Moderna lied. Not about the technique but the fact that mRNA research has fallen under the rubric of “gene therapy” for decades, as demonstrated at the National Institute of Health library in a plethora of research papers:

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the National Institute of Health website: “Synthetic messenger RNA [mRNA] as a tool for gene therapy” [2]

What the Moderna psyops people want you to think (when disingenuously narrowing the definition of gene therapy) is, because they are not modifying the DNA, where the actual genes are located, it is not gene therapy. But guess what? RNA is also genetic material with significance when it is subjected to corporate scientific (greed driven) monkey business.

The imperfect (but adequate) analogy would be DNA comprises the headquarters issuing instructions intended to build certain structures. mRNA is the courier delivering the DNA blueprint to the construction site. What mRNA “gene therapy” accomplishes is, it swaps the blueprint little different to if you’d sent instructions via a courier service but the instructions you’d sent are not what arrived at the intended destination because someone in the courier service had substituted the original with an altered set of instructions. In the case of the Moderna covid gene therapy (it is NOT a vaccine in any sense of what ‘vaccine’ meant prior to covid) the problem is (again, as in the case of Bamlanivimab in part one) this therapy has been ‘fast tracked’ and employed under emergency powers that forego the normal required studies that law would require prior to approval. In short, the long term health implications for the people receiving this therapy is unknown or restated, psychopath (greed driven) corporate lobbyists ($) have bought, convinced or otherwise subverted institutions to a point the common citizens are little different to lab rats.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Popular Mechanics website: “After a remarkably accelerated development period, two experimental COVID-19 (coronavirus) vaccines are almost ready for primetime. Both use a technology called messenger RNA (mRNA), which has been studied and experimented with for decades in different forms, but has never been used in a commercial vaccine” [3]

Note the terminology “accelerated development”, “experimental” and “never been used.” In short other words, inadequately studied and only authorized for the fact of a ‘state of emergency.’

Screenshot of the “Emergency Use Authorizations” for Moderna & Pfizer mRNA injections at the USA’s Food & Drug Administration website [4]

Following on part one (the suppression of an effective, cheap anti-covid drug, ivermectin, while promoting an unstudied, experimental drug, Bamlanivimab), in this follow on part two, it becomes clear promoting human health and rapid recovery is not the primary objective of the institutions charged with containing the so-called “pandemic.” In fact, it would appear transcendent corruption is treading a path towards a state of biological terror waged by the Western governments on its own citizens in absence of any practice of ethical self restraint that should have 1) employed ivermectin as a safe, cheap and effective covid cure and 2) developed a classic vaccine, with proven safe method based on ‘inactivated’ (dead) virus as the Chinese had done. Meanwhile, let’s hope the Chinese act responsibly in further research efforts when considering mRNA gene therapy. [5], [6], [7], [8]

Follow the Money

In whose interest is using the national body of citizens as lab rats?

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the American Broadcasting Corporation website: “Gates, who had invested in the vaccine technology in 2015, emphasized the importance of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines ending this pandemic and potentially ones to come in the future” [9]

Bill Gates is hardly a molecular scientist. What Bill Gates actually is, is a narcissist. Does Bill Gates understand that mRNA is experimental, understudied technique, that quite possibly could prove to be anything but beneficial to human health over long term? A narcissist won’t entertain the question. But the matter of fact is, Bill Gates is playing God with his wealth buying influence determining covid policy on a global scale in circumstance of demanding employ of experimental, understudied and/or untested remedies that can only be approved with emergency authorizations because they are NOT proven safe.

World Health Organization illustration (screenshot) showing the Gates Foundation is the WHO’s 2nd largest provider of funds (after the USA) in 2018-2019, the Gates’ contribution exceeding USD $500,000,000 for the period. [10], [11]

Lies by Omission

Meanwhile, in Serbia, media remaining silent on the effectiveness of ivermectin while the use of the experimental Bamlanivimab is allowed without warning of its unstudied/untested status (this author had emailed this information to several English language Serbian news outlets with no acknowledgement or reply), and where there is no exam of the experimental nature of the mRNA anti-covid injection, also allowed in Serbia, there appears to be an element of rank hypocrisy when the authority is threatening imprisonment for ‘fake news’ concerning vaccinations when the state itself is withholding information the citizens should require to make informed decisions; because it is truly disseminating fake news to allow citizens the impression mRNA ‘vaccines’ (gene therapies) are safe.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from Telegraf website: “Both [Minister of Justice Maja Popovic and Minister of Health Zlatibor Loncar]
referred to the Criminal Code, which in Article 343 stipulates that anyone who, by presenting or transmitting false news or allegations, causes panic or serious disturbance of public order or peace or thwarts or significantly impedes implementation of decisions and measures of state bodies or organizations exercising public authority, shall be punished by imprisonment of between three months and three years, and with a fine” [12]

In light of the preceding, we should close with a dry observation; criminal negligence is demonstrated throughout the institutions charged with containing corona virus (on a global scale.) Whether due to corporate psyops (propaganda) manipulating narcissism in a state of greed driven political expediency or preying upon incompetence, transcendent corruption is the (above the law) corporate-coopted-corrupted state’s exercise of impunity. Who’s to panic? Leadership in a state of exposure?

“Truth is suppressed, not to protect the country from enemy agents but to protect the Government against the people” -Roy Hattersley

 

[1] https://www.modernatx.com/about-mrna

[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17007566/

[3] https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a34787908/what-is-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-pfizer-moderna/

[4] https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization#covid19euas

[5] https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2021/04/01/transcendent-corruption-corona-virus-part-one/

[6] https://theconversation.com/how-are-covid-19-vaccines-made-an-expert-explains-155430

[7] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-12/china-vaccine-going-global-with-four-different-efficacy-rates

[8] https://sputniknews.com/asia/202104121082602410-chinese-cdc-director-refutes-reportedly-claiming-chinese-vaccines-have-low-protection-rate/

[9] https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-announces-250-million-covid/story?id=74651890

[10] https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2020-05-29/gates-foundation-donations-to-who-nearly-match-those-from-us-government

[11] http://open.who.int/2018-19/contributors/contributor

[12] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3320196-those-spreading-fake-news-about-vaccines-and-vaccination-face-up-to-5-years-in-prison

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Read in English

Još od onih dana kada je Edvard Bernajz prilagodio psihološke principe svog ujaka Sigmunda Frojda propagandi (eufemistički preimenovanu u „Odnosi s javnošću“) u svrhu korporativnog oglašavanja, svetsko stanovništvo je izloženo onome što obaveštajne agencije nazivaju „psiop“ ili „psihološke operacije“. U određenim okolnostima, ove operacije su pažljivo osmišljene kako bi ih podržali političari, u onom smislu u kom obaveštajne agencije tumače „ojačano“ ili preformulisano: laganje javnosti zahteva neetičko „ubeđivanje“ (laganje) nacionalnog rukovodstva da bi postiglo određene (pohlepom podstaknute) tržišne ciljeve. Dalje, ova „kultura“ može lako reflektovati ono što je bitanga Filip Ejdži, pripadnik CIA-e, primetio da postaje fenomen u socijalnom okruženju:

„Toliko se naviknete da lažete, da se nakon nekog vremena teško setite šta je istina.“

Ukratko, drugim rečima, infekcija lobističkog kapitalizma (Odnosi s javnošću) stvara socijalno- kulturno okruženje u kojem „istina“ postaje „relativna“ ili sporedna, slučajna ili često, namerno prikrivena (u zavisnosti od nivoa svesti u hijerarhiji) stvar sa malo uticaja na ono što je postalo plastificirana ili veštačka stvarnost za ciljeve većih psiop (populacija). [1]

„Psiop“ ili psihologija integrisana u prezentacije lobista, koje su pripremljene za političare, zapravo su neophodni „pre-psiop“ za postizanje većeg psiopskog cilja manipulisanja stanovništvom da „kupuje“ i ide otprilike poput ove hipotetičke analize onoga što se odnedavno događa u Srbiji:

„Pacijenti… su primili novi lek protiv kovida-19 Bamlanivimab, koji sprečava dalje širenje infekcije, odnosno progresiju bolesti iz blage u tešku kliničku sliku…“ [2]

Nigde u ovoj vesti prezentovanoj na medijskom sajtu u Srbiji nema ni pomena da je:

1) Bamlanivimab eksperimentalni lek, koji je prvobitno odobren za upotrebu protiv kovida u SAD- u u decembru 2020. godine, samo zbog vanrednog stanja; lek nije prošao neophodne studije i medicinske procedure testiranja, koje zakon uobičajeno nalaže da bi se zaštitili potrošači.

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sa drugs.com: „Još uvek nije poznato da li je Bamlanivimab bezbedan i delotvoran tretman za bilo koje stanje“ [3]

2) Za ivermektin, jeftin, generički lek, sa rezultatima o bezbednosti upotrebe već 50 godina, potvrđeno je u laboratorijskim ispitivanjima (u aprilu 2020. godine ili pre punih godinu dana) da ubija 99,8% virusa kovid-19 za 24 sata, ali ova medicinska činjenica je praktično nepoznata srpskoj medicinskoj zajednici. Zašto?

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) sa drugs.com: “Testiranja su dosad pokazala da ivermektin umanjuje broj ćelija povezanih sa virusnim RNK za 99.8 % za 24 sata” [4]

3) Nakon (april 2020. godine na gornjoj ilustraciji) rezultata laboratorijskog testiranja ivermektina na kovid, ovaj lek je korišćen u Peruu i zabeležen je DRAMATIČNI PAD u broju smrtnih slučajeva od kovid-a, odnosno sve dok nije došlo do promene u političkoj administraciji i upotreba ivermektina ograničena, što je dovelo do DRAMATIČNOG PORASTA u broju smrtnih slučajeva od kovid-a. [5]

4) Zahtev od strane vrhunskih zdravstvenih stručnjaka širom sveta, koji uporno dostavljaju podatke Svetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji, da pokuša da odobri upotrebu ivermektina dovodi samo do obećanja „istraživanja“, bez obzira na to što postojeći pozitivni rezultat, potvrđen u više navrata, dolazi od vrhunskih specijalista u svetu (dok vladine institucije, poput američke Federalne uprave za hranu i lekove, vuku noge i zahtevaju velike, dugotrajne studije).

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) iz MSN-ovog članka o Svetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji i ivermektinu: američki specijalista za plućne bolesti i intenzivnu negu Pjer Kori, predsednik Front- Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – grupe stručnjaka za intenzivnu negu i objavljivanih akademskih autora koji razvijaju protokole lečenja kako bi sprečili prenošenje kovida-19: „To je sigurno još jedna alatka u kompletu alata i potrebno nam je sve što možemo da učinimo da pobedimo ovu pandemiju. Nije da mislim da Ivermektin može da pomogne ljudima. Znam da pomaže ljudima. Podaci su nepogrešivi i dosledni. Pokazuje brže vreme otklanjanja virusa, manje prisustvo virusa, brže vreme oporavka i nižu stopu smrtnosti .“ [6]

5) Dakle, prešli smo sa „Još uvek nije poznato da li je Bamlanivimab siguran i efikasan lek za bilo koje stanje“ na suzbijanje poznatog kao bezbednog (pedeset godina) leka za koji je potvrđeno da pobeđuje kovid. Zašto? Jeftin, generički lek (ivermektin) koji je efikasan ne donosi novac Eli Lilly (velikoj farmaceutskoj kompaniji). Cena jedne doze eksperimentalnog leka Bamlanivimab za covid? 1.250 USD.

Cena jedne delotvorne doze ivermektina protiv kovida? Preko 95% manje od Bamlanivimaba.

Ipak, Bamlanivimab je odabrani tretman nacionalnih vlada (ne samo u SAD-u, već i drugih, vodeći se primerom SAD-a), čak iako američki Nacionalni institut za zdravlje dozvoljava (ako ne odobrava) ivermektin kao tretman za kovid, zbog ogromnog pritiska medicinskih radnika. [7]

Istaknuto na ilustraciji (screenshot-u) iz Blitz vesti: „Siguran, jeftin, široko dostupan, sa višedecenijskim rezultatima, pa čak i Nobelovom nagradom, lek je nedavno uklonio prepreke Nacionalnog instituta za zdravlje (NIH) kako bi bio dozvoljen tretman za kovid-19. Lekari u prvim redovima borbe koji lek koriste sa velikim uspehom zagovaraju stav da ga treba široko i brzo usvojiti “

„Transcendentna korupcija“ je legalna, ali neetička i nemoralna dobit koja zahteva društvenu cenu koja uključuje nepotrebnu patnju i smrt. To je, u izvesnom smislu, nekažnjeno, legalizovano ubistvo. To funkcioniše ovako: „nauku“ političarima predstavljaju grupe ljudi obučenih za psiops (odnose s javnošću) u kulturi političkih laži, gde lobisti jednostavno ukazuju na to da SAD „odobravaju“ (ne pominjući da se, prema ovlašćenjima dobijenim u vanrednom stanju, odriču studija bezbednosti) nedokazani, eksperimentalni lek Bamlanivimab i u potpunosti ostaju nemi po pitanju ivermektina. Budući da političari zavise od novca lobista i s njim povezane moći, bilo u „legalnom“ obliku doniranja (metod transcendentne korupcije za podmićivanje) ili drugim oblicima bogaćenja, poput investicija, oni jednostavno prihvataju reč lobista i Eli Lilly (veliki farmaceutski igrač u ovom slučaju) zarađuje ogroman novac, bacajući kockice po leđima običnih građana; gde građani, ne samo preko poreza plaćaju ogromne sume novca za nedokazani lek, već će, u nedostatku studija bezbednosti, u budućnosti možda doslovno plaćati i životom. U slučaju da neko navede ivermektin kao prihvatljivu alternativu, lobisti će ukazati na američku Upravu za hranu i lekove (ili druge vlade i agencije) koje preporučuju da se ne upotrebljava, kao i na Svetsku zdravstvenu organizaciju koja još uvek nije odobrila upotrebu ivermektina, i neće pomenuti da je američki Nacionalni institut za zdravlje dozvoljava upotrebu ivermektina i brojne pozitivne kritike o ovom sigurnom, jeftinom leku u lečenju kovida od strane medicinskih stručnjaka širom sveta.

Relevantno za prethodno rečeno, u Srbiji, transcendentna korupcija u medijima ima dvostruku putanju; od kojih nijedna nije dobra za običan narod. 1) „Režim“ u Srbiji napadaju da je korumpiran, oni mediji koji su izdanja zapadnjačkog tipa medija, okarakterisani kao „opozicija“, ali ih u stvari finansiraju „ko je ko“ od huškača obojenih revolucija, kao što je Soroš i ostali osumnjičeni, koji su obično paravan za zapadne obaveštajne agencije, poput nekoliko organizacija koje funkcionišu pod „okriljem“ (javna kuća bi bila bolja reč) USAID-a. Očekivano, trebalo bi da ima malo interesa za podizanje svesti o ivermektinu u ovim „opozicionim“ medijskim prostorima koji forsiraju agende zapadnog korporativnog kapitalizma i njegovih ljubimaca, oligarha, u ovom slučaju, onih, povezanih sa velikim farmaceutskim kompanijama. 2) Biće malo motivacije za „režim“ da ispravi sopstvene greške u moru političkih laži i podigne svest o ivermektinu; gde u okolnostima transcendentne korupcije, uz pomoć psiopa (Odnosi s javnošću), glavne vođe zauzimaju stav (samo) poricanja stvarnih činjenica; režimski političari će zapravo sebe uveriti da rade ono što je dobro za narod (odobriti Bamlanivimab), a mediji pod kontrolom države neće kompromitovati ruku koja ih hrani. Ovo je kumulativni rezultat psipovog lova na krhkost ljudske psihologije, prema zapažanju Tukidida od pre 2500 godina:

„Navika je čovečanstva da nepažljivoj nadi poveri ono za čim čezne, a da suverenim razumom odbaci ono što radije ne bi da ispituje.“

 

[1] https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Edward_Bernays

[2] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3318680-clinical-center-of-vojvodina-patients-start-received-new-drug-against-covid

[3] https://www.drugs.com/mtm/bamlanivimab.html

[4] https://archive.li/Rh7m1

[5] https://trialsitenews.com/ivermectin-for-covid-19-in-peru-14-fold-reduction-in-nationwide-excess-deaths-p-002-for-effect-by-state-then-13-fold-increase-after-ivermectin-use-restricted/

[6] https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/who-to-probe-use-of-ivermectin-for-covid-19-treatment-after-promising-results-in-trials/ar-BB1cZDIp

[7] https://www.weeklyblitz.net/health/ivermectin-shows-great-success-in-treating-covid-19/

 

Srbija

 

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

*

 

Čitajte na srpskom

Since the days of Edward Bernays adapting his uncle Sigmund Freud’s psychological principles to propaganda (euphemistically renamed ‘public relations’) for purpose of corporate advertising, the world’s populace has been exposed to what the intelligence agencies refer to as ‘psyops’ or “psychological operations.” In certain circumstance these operations are carefully designed to be supported by politicians in the intelligence agency sense of ‘backstopped’ or restated: Lying to the public requires unethical ‘convincing’ (lying to) a nation’s leadership to accomplish certain (greed driven) marketing objectives. Furthermore, this ‘culture’ can easily reflect what rogue CIA officer Phillip Agee had noted becomes a social-environmental phenomenon:

“You get so used to lying that, after awhile, it’s hard to remember what the truth is.” 

In short other words, capitalism’s lobbyist (public relations) infection creates a social-cultural environment where ‘truth’ becomes a ‘relative’ or incidental, accidental, or oftentimes, a deliberately concealed (depending on the level of awareness within the hierarchy) thing with little bearing on what has become a plasticized, or artificial, reality for the targets of larger psyops (populations.) [1]

The ‘psyops’ or psychology integrated to lobbyists’ presentations prepared for politicians are actually a necessary ‘pre-psyop’ to accomplish the larger psyops goal of manipulating a populace to ‘buy’ and it goes something like this hypothetical analysis of what is recently happening in Serbia:

“Patients … have started receiving a new drug against Covid-19, Bamlanivimab, which prevents further spread of the infection, that is, the progression of the disease from mild to severe…” [2]

Nowhere in this news presented at the Serbian media site is there any mention that

1) Bamlanivimab is an experimental drug that had been initially authorized for use against covid in the USA in December 2020 only because of a state of emergency; the drug has not been put through the necessary studies and medical trial procedures the law would normally require to protect the consumers.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from drugs.com: “It is not yet known if Bamlanivimab is a safe and effective treatment for any condition” [3]

2) Ivermectin, a cheap, generic drug, with a safety track record of 50 years use, had been shown in laboratory testing (April 2020 or a full year ago) to kill 99.8% of the covid 19 virus in 24 hours, but this medical fact is practically unknown to the Serbian medical community. Why?

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from drugs.com: “The trials so far have shown ivermectin reduces the number of cell-associated viral RNA by 99.8 % in 24 hours” [4]

3) Following the (dated April 2020 in the above screenshot) ivermectin lab test result on covid, this drug was used in Peru and there was a DRAMATIC DROP in covid deaths, that is until there was a change in political administration and the use of ivermectin had been restricted, which saw a DRAMATIC HIKE in covid deaths [5]

4) Demand from top health professionals across the world pushing data at the World Health Organization to attempt authorizing the use of ivermectin merely elicits a promise of a ‘probe’, no matter the existing positive result indicated in multiple trails comes from some of the top specialists in the world (as government institutions like the USA’s Federal Food & Drug Administration drag their feet and demand large, time consuming studies)

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from an MSN article on World Health Organization & ivermectin: American pulmonary and critical care specialist Pierre Kory, president of the Front-Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – a group of critical care specialists and published academic authors developing treatment protocols to prevent the transmission of Covid-19: “It is certainly another tool in the toolkit and we need everything we can to go after this pandemic. It’s not that I think that Ivermectin can help people. I know it helps people. The data is unmistakable and consistent. It shows quicker time to viral clearance, lower viral loads, faster times to recovery and lowered mortality rates” [6]

5) So, we have gone from “It is not yet known if Bamlanivimab is a safe and effective treatment for any condition” to the suppression of a known to be safe (fifty years) drug that is shown to beat covid. Why? A cheap generic drug (ivermectin) that is effective doesn’t make Eli Lilly (big pharma) money. The price of a experimental drug Bamlanivimab dose for covid? USD $1,250.

The price for an effective against covid dose of ivermectin? Over 95% less than Bamlanivimab

Yet Bamlanivimab is the national governments (not only in USA but following the USA’s lead) covid treatment of choice, even as the USA’s National Institute of Health allows (if not endorses) ivermectin as a covid treatment due to overwhelming pressure from medical professionals [7]

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Blitz news site: “Safe, inexpensive, widely available, with a decades-long track record, and even a Nobel Prize attached to it, the drug recently cleared National Institute of Health (NIH) hurdles to be an allowed treatment for Covid-19. Frontline doctors using the drug to great success argue it needs to be adopted widely and rapidly”

“Transcendent Corruption” is legal but unethical and immoral gains that exacts a social price up to, and is inclusive of, unnecessary suffering and death. It is in a sense legalized murder with impunity. It works like this: ‘science’ is presented to politicians by psyops (public relations) trained parties in a culture of political lies where lobbyists simply point to the USA ‘approving’ (not mentioning under emergency powers, forgoing safety studies) the unproven, experimental drug Bamlanivimab and altogether remain silent on ivermectin. Because the politicians are dependent on the lobbyists money and associated power, whether in ‘legal’ form of donation (transcendent corruption’s method of bribe) or other forms of enrichment such as investment, they simply accept the lobbyists’ word and Eli Lilly (big pharma’s player in this case) makes immense amounts of money with a dice throw on the common citizens backs; where the citizens not only pay the outrageous sum for the unproven medicine with taxes, the citizens will, in the absence of safety studies, perhaps pay in future with their literal lives. In the case someone brings up ivermectin as a plausible alternative, the lobbyists will point to the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (or other governments & agencies) recommending against its use, as well the World Health Organization having not yet approved ivermectin’s use, and fail to mention the USA’s National Institute of Health allows the use of ivermectin and the many positive reviews for this safe, cheap drug in treating covid by medical professionals across the world.

Relevant to the preceding, in Serbia, Transcendent Corruption in media takes a twofold track; neither of which is good for the common people. 1) the ‘regime’ is attacked as corrupt by those Western style media outlets characterized as ‘opposition’ but in fact are funded by a ‘who’s who’ of color revolution instigators such as Soros, and the many usual suspects fronting for Western intelligence agencies, such as the several organizations functioning under the ‘umbrella’ (‘whorehouse’ would be the better noun) of USAID. Predictably, there should be little interest in raising awareness concerning ivermectin in these ‘opposition’ media venues pushing agendas for Western corporate capitalism and its oligarch minions, in this case, those associated with big pharma. 2) There will be little motivation for the ‘regime’ to correct its mistakes in a sea of political lies and raise awareness concerning ivermectin; where in circumstance of  Transcendent Corruption, with a psyops (public relations) assist, the principal leaders assume a posture of (self) denial of the actual facts; the regime’s politicians will have actually convinced themselves they are doing what is good for the people (authorize Bamlanivimab) and state controlled media will not bite the hand that feeds them. This is cumulative result of psyops preying upon a frailty of human psychology per the observation of Thucydides 2,500 years past:

“It is the habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they would prefer not to examine”

 

Related: Covid 19 (scientific counter-narratives)

 

[1] https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Edward_Bernays

[2] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3318680-clinical-center-of-vojvodina-patients-start-received-new-drug-against-covid

[3] https://www.drugs.com/mtm/bamlanivimab.html

[4] https://archive.li/Rh7m1

[5] https://trialsitenews.com/ivermectin-for-covid-19-in-peru-14-fold-reduction-in-nationwide-excess-deaths-p-002-for-effect-by-state-then-13-fold-increase-after-ivermectin-use-restricted/

[6] https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/who-to-probe-use-of-ivermectin-for-covid-19-treatment-after-promising-results-in-trials/ar-BB1cZDIp

[7] https://www.weeklyblitz.net/health/ivermectin-shows-great-success-in-treating-covid-19/

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

This was the location of a draft article which may now be found in finished form HERE

 

Read in English

„…takođe je jasno da je ukupna stopa smrtnosti u 2020. godini premašena tokom pet godina, u periodu 1999-2003. Ovde moram da definišem stopu smrtnosti, jer se ona zasniva na umrlima na hiljadu ljudi, što eliminiše činjenicu da je populacija bila manja u ranijim godinama. S obzirom na to da veća populacija može imati veći ukupan broj smrtnih slučajeva od date bolesti, ali ne i veću stopu smrtnosti. Bolesti deluju na osetljive pojedince u populaciji i, prema tome, to je deo populacije koji oboli ili umre.

Međutim, kako se stopa smrtnosti u Velikoj Britaniji za 2020. godinu upoređuje sa prethodnim godinama? Jasno je da stopa smrtnosti u Velikoj Britaniji za 2020. godinu nije bila izuzetna u poređenju sa prethodnim godinama. Kako je to moguće, kako to može biti? Ako imate Kovid-19, kao i grip koji ubija ljude, šta se dešava? Izneto je zapažanje da je, iz nekih misterioznih razloga, grip u SAD od aprila pao na nulu i ostaje na nuli u poslednjoj sezoni gripa.

U svetlu očigledno nestalog gripa, iznete su tvrdnje da je nošenje maski, distanciranje i zaključavanje bilo potpuno efikasno protiv gripa, ali tada, ne govori se o njihovom neuspehu u zaustavljanju Kovida-19, koji je virus iste veličine i modela prenosa.

Onda nam kažu da je Kovid još uvek prisutan, jer ljudi ne nose maske i slično, što znači da bi grip takođe trebalo da postoji u SAD-u. Pošto se radi o zaraznim virusima, kako ova ograničenja mogu biti efikasna protiv jednog, a ne protiv drugog virusa? To nema smisla.

Takođe, lako je ustanoviti da američke države koje imaju stroge pandemijske mere imaju istu stopu PCR pozitivnih slučajeva kao i one koje nemaju. Može se pretpostaviti da se slučajevi gripa uglavnom prijavljuju kao Kovid-19, na osnovu pozitivnog rezultata PCR testa ili samo na osnovu simptoma.

U SAD-u je jasno da postoji novčani podsticaj za dijagnozu bolesti i podsticanje hospitalizacija. Prestanak ostalih medicinskih procedura i testova tokom ovog perioda očigledno će dovesti do povećanja ukupnih smrtnih slučajeva. Činjenica da, uprkos tome, izgleda da nema više smrtnih slučajeva, ukazuje na to da sam virus C-19 nije bio toliko smrtonosan kao što tvrde.

Sveukupno, stopa smrtnosti u Velikoj Britaniji nije veća od normalne stope smrtnosti iz drugih godina i očigledno nije ni blizu najviše u poslednje 22 godine. Teško je uzeti u obzir smrtnost od gripa, kada se čini da postoji pristrasnost prema kategorizaciji smrtnosti od gripa i drugih uzroka kao što je Kovid-19.

Svake godine i, u ovom slučaju, tokom cele godine, postoji populacija zdravstveno kritičnih pojedinaca, koji mogu biti savladani bolešću sličnom gripu i podložni komplikacijama upale pluća. Čini se da sumnjivi PCR test za Kovid-19 održava prisustvo Kovida-19 u životu, verovatno otkrivajući viruse tekuće sezone gripa.

SZO sada priznaje da ovaj test može pokazati 97% ili više lažno pozitivnih, sa većim brojem ciklusa obrade. Mogao bi se izneti argument da imamo epidemiju [lažno pozitivnog] testiranja…“

Ili bar tako kaže doktor biologije Benson Vilkot na sajtu „marginalne zavere“ Principia Scientific International. [1]

Prema tome, potražio sam nekoliko referenci koje nisu povezane sa samim sajtom „marginalna zavera“ na temu kako je „grip nestao“ i izgleda da je Vilkot u pravu.

Zašto? Pokušavao sam da shvatim Kovid brojeve u Srbiji (koji nemaju smisla), a Vilkotov članak je bio prvi na koji sam naišao i koji je to pitanje osmislio na razuman način.

Konkretno, želeo sam da znam kako opaki patogen (Kovid) može opravdati „mere“ pandemije kada nacionalna stopa smrtnosti za 2020. godinu nije porasla (uopšte) u poređenju sa prethodnim godinama:

Grafikon: Stopa smrtnosti u Srbiji je u poslednje četiri godine bila na nivou od 13,2 smrtnih slučajeva na 1000; 2017., 2018., 2019. i 2020. [2]

Sajt „marginalne zavere“ me je naterao da pogledam druge statistike kako bih utvrdio (ili oborio) njenu istinitost, bacajući širu mrežu da vidim šta se dešava negde drugde u poređenju sa Srbijom, i eto ga! Takozvani „progresivni“ sajt VOX News podržava dve stvari koje je izneo autor „marginalne zavere“ Vilkot:

1) Grip je bukvalno nestao u SAD-u (VOX grafikon zasluga Centra za kontrolu i prevenciju bolesti) za statističku sezonu 2020-2021 i 2) VOX-ov članak podržava oksimoron koji je istakao Vilkot; pripisivanje zasluge nošenju maski za „istorijski“ nizak nivo gripa u istom okruženju gde maske NISU zaustavile širenje Kovida, bolesti koja se širi na identičan način. Jasno je da neko nije iskren u vezi sa fenomenom „nestalog gripa“ i čini se da je taj neiskren neko VOX, a da to NIJE autor „marginalne zavere“ Vilkot. [3]

Sada, za neku početnu perspektivu o onome što se svakako čini da su naduvane brojke koje se u SAD-u pripisuju Kovidu sa izuzetno nepouzdanim PCR testovima, kao i odustajanje od testova za druge patogene (što uključuje nestali grip i verovatno mnogo desetina hiljada smrtnih slučajeva od drugih patogena i srodnih primarnih uzroka kao što je slabo zdravlje ili bilo koji drugi razlog koji se pogrešno pripisuje Kovidu). [4]

Ako uzmemo otprilike 500.000 smrtnih slučajeva „pripisanih“ Kovidu u SAD-u i primenimo to kao procenat na američku populaciju od oko 300 miliona za sezonu 2020-2021, Amerikanci su stigli do žrtvovanja svojih građanskih sloboda od 0,16% bruto populacije Kovid stope smrtnosti, koja se oslanja na ozbiljno naduvane (zvanične) brojeve Kovida koji uključuju nestali grip i neizrečene druge uzroke smrti, poput smrtnih slučajeva povezanih sa stresom usled primarnih zdravstvenih problema pogoršanih zaključavanjima, politikom povezanom sa Kovidom koja gura ljude u siromaštvo i veći mortalitet, američkim zapanjujućim problemom sa gojaznošću (Kovid u velikom broju ubija gojazne ljude), oslabljenošću američke vrtoglavo rastuće populacije bez doma i slično. Biće potrebne godine studija da bi se ovi brojevi sasvim razjasnili, ali u međuvremenu, visoko politizovanim (vođenim od strane dr Fausta) sticanjem moći, korišćenjem panike uzrokovane Kovidom, sve se neiskreno zbraja zajedno.
Kao što je istakao Vilkot, zvanični američki brojevi (koji se ne zbrajaju) su u skladu su sa onim što je primećeno u podacima Velike Britanije. Treba očekivati da će to biti slučaj i drugde.

Nazad na Srbiju:

Ako uzmemo „zvaničnu“ stopu smrtnosti od Kovida 0,9% ili 4.700 smrtnih slučajeva (nužno uključuje „nestali“ grip i druge neizrečene načine smrti) i umesto da primenimo ovo na ono što bi trebalo nazvati „broj lažno pozitivnih rezultata“ ili 516.000 (prijavljenih pozitivnih), već da primenimo ovu zvaničnu statistiku smrti (4.700) koja se pripisuje Kovidu na 8.700.000 stanovništva Srbije u celini (uključujući netestirane i testirane negativne) da bi dostigli 0,05%, tek tada ravna nacionalna stopa smrtnosti (nema značajnog statističkog porasta) za „pandemijsku“ 2020. godinu počinje da ima smisla, jer tek tada možemo shvatiti šta se dogodilo sa „nestalim“ gripom i drugim, neizrečenim načinom smrti. Ubačeni su u Kovid statistiku. Ne postoji drugo pošteno objašnjenje. [5]

Sada kada je odbranjen autor „marginalne zavere“ dr Benson Vilkot, ukratko ćemo skrenuti pažnju na još jedan članak na „uvredljivom“ sajtu Principia Scientific International o Kovidu: članak drugog doktora (psihologije), dr Elze Šider, o ivermektinu. Ukratko, ona jednostavno iznosi ono za šta se zna da je naučno utvrđena činjenica; ivermektin leči Kovid, osim u onim državama koje suzbijaju ove informacije o efikasnom, generičkom (jeftinom) leku koji bi trebalo da ospori histeriju sa vakcinama. [6], [7]

Neizbežni zaključak je da Kovid, iako stvaran, a u nekim slučajevima i smrtonosan, nije ni približno toliko smrtonosan na društvenoj osnovi kao što nam se predstavlja, i ne mora biti ni toliko smrtonosan kao što je trenutno. Očigledno pitanje je zašto?

Društvena analiza

Prvo, naročito u zapadnim kulturama, ljudi lažu sebe, posebno kada je reč o novčanim interesima nasuprot altruizmu. Veliki je novac u proglašavanju Kovida (preuveličanom) „pandemijom“, a samovažnost pretvara altruizam u laž (samoobmana da se radi ispravno), a zapravo su novčani interesi (novac je snaga) pokretač nagona za kontrolom. Dakle, Kovid „pandemija“ nije toliko zavera za kontrolu populacije (čak i dok se za to smišljaju strategije), toliko koliko je to moćna ideja koja naduvava sopstvenu važnost.

Političari zapadnog stila (hvatajući mamac od sociopata oligarha koji ih love s lobistima) su narcisi, a narcis je onaj koncept ličnosti koji je najizloženiji samoobmanama. Laički rečeno, treba reći da su naši lideri samouveličani moroni, nesposobni da shvate da je šteta koju prouzrokuju daleko gora od štete koja bi se dogodila ako bi se sklonili sa puta, zaustavili politizaciju medicine i pustili zajednicu lekara da radi svoj posao sa kompletnim nizom Kovid činjenica koje su im dostupne (npr. leče ivermektinom).

Što se tiče sajta „marginalne zavere“ Principia Scientific International, u stvari se u njemu nalazi ličnost povezana sa islamofobom kao što je to pomenula dr Elza Šider, koja je upravo pružila tačne informacije o ivermektinu, zajedno sa brojnim drugim obučenim naučnicima koji (iz bilo kog razloga) ne mogu naći mesto u glavnim medijima gde bi se čuo njihov glas. Šta to govori o zapadnoj kulturi kada tražite bolje informacije, a nađete ih na sajtu koji nije u potpunosti ugledan? Kako je to nekako više osuđujuće od laži zapadnih medija kojima nas svakodnevno hrane korporativni interesi koji štite interese zapadnih oligarha i njihove korumpirane sopstvene (i društvene) prevare u vezi s Kovidom, što dovodi do nepotrebnih gubitaka života?

[1] https://principia-scientific.com/uk-covid-conundrum-the-mysterious-case-of-disappearing-flu/

[2] https://knoema.com/atlas/Serbia/Death-rate

[3] https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22272237/flu-cases-down-historic-what-does-it-mean

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3313670-serbian-government-to-adopt-stricter-covid-measures-upper-elementary-school-grades-switch-online

[6] https://principia-scientific.com/ivermectin-miracle-drug-against-covid-19/

[7] https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

*

iRNK: „To je genska terapija, a ne vakcina“

Kovid: Suzbijanje naučnih kontra-narativa

*

Srbija

 

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Čitajte na srpskom

“…It is also clear that the overall death rate in 2020 was exceeded by the five years of 1999-2003. I need to define the death rate here, as it is based on the deaths per thousand people, which eliminates the fact that populations were lower in earlier years. It’s a given that larger population might have a higher death total from a given disease, but not a higher death rate. Diseases work on the susceptible individuals of a population and, thus, it is a proportion of the population that becomes ill or dies.

“That said, how does the death rate in the UK for 2020 compare to previous years? It is clear that the death rate in the UK for 2020 was not exceptional compared to previous years. How can that be? If you have Covid-19 as well as influenza killing people, what is going on? An observation has been made that, for some mysterious reason, influenza, as of April in the US, dropped to zero and continues at zero in the latest flu season.

“In light of the apparent missing influenza, claims have been made that masking, distancing, and lockdowns were completely effective against influenza, but then there is no talk about its failure in stopping Covid-19, which is a virus of the same size and transmission mode.

“Then, we are told that Covid is still around because people are not masking and such properly, which means influenza should also still be around in the US. Since these are infectious viruses, how can these restrictions be effective against one virus and not the other? It does not make sense.

“It is also easy to find that US states with strict mandates have the same rates of PCR-positive cases as those who do not. The conjecture can be made that influenza cases are largely reported as Covid-19, based either on a positive PCR test result or on symptoms alone.

“In the US, it is clear that there has been a monetary incentive for diagnosing the disease and encouraging hospitalizations. The cessation of other medical procedures and tests during this period clearly is going to lead to increased overall deaths. The fact that there appears to be no excess deaths despite this, indicates that the C-19 virus itself was not as lethal as they claim.

“Overall, the death rate in the UK is not out of line with the normal death rates from other years and clearly not close to the highest in the last 22 years. It is difficult to consider influenza deaths when there appears to be a bias toward categorizing influenza and other causes as Covid-19 deaths.

“Every year and, for that matter, all year long, there is a population of health-critical individuals who may be overwhelmed by a flu-like illness and open to pneumonia complications. The questionable Covid-19 PCR test appears to be keeping the presence of Covid-19 alive, possibly detecting viruses of the current flu season.

“The WHO is now admitting that that this test can be 97% false positives or more, with higher processing cycle numbers. The argument could be made that we have an epidemic of [false positive] testing…”

Or so says PhD biologist Banson Wilcot at ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International. [1]

So, I looked up several references not related to the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site itself on the subject of how the ‘flu vanished’ and Wilcot seems to spot on.

Why? I was trying to make sense of Covid numbers in Serbia (that don’t make sense) and Wilcot’s was the first article I’d come across that addressed the issue in a sensible way. Specifically, I wanted to know how a vicious pathogen (Covid) could justify pandemic “measures” when the national mortality rate for the year 2020 hadn’t spiked (at all) in comparison to previous years:

Graph: Serbia’s death rate has been flat at 13.2 deaths average per 1,000 for the past four years; 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2020. [2]

The ‘fringe conspiracy’ site then caused me to look at other statistics to establish (or disestablish) its veracity while casting a wider net to see what is going on elsewhere in comparison to Serbia and violà! The so-called ‘progressive’ site VOX News supports two points made by ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot:

1) Flu has virtually vanished in the USA (VOX graph credit to Center for Disease Control and Prevention) for the 2020-2021 statistical season &  2) the VOX article upholds the oxymoron pointed out by Wilcot; crediting masks for the ‘historic’ low level of flu in the same environment where masks have NOT halted the spread of Covid, a disease spread by identical method. Clearly, someone is not being honest concerning the ‘vanished flu’ phenomenon and it would appear that dishonest someone is VOX and is NOT ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot. [3]

Now, for some initial perspective on what certainly appear to be grossly inflated figures ascribed to Covid in the USA with highly unreliable PCR tests as well as forgoing tests for other pathogens (includes the vanished flu and likely many tens of thousands of deaths by other pathogens and related underlying cause such as frail health or any other reason wrongly attributed to Covid.) [4]

If we take the roughly 500,000 deaths ‘attributed’ to Covid in the USA and apply that as a percentage to the USA population of about 330 million for the 2020-2021 season, Americans arrived at sacrificing their civil liberties for a 0.15% gross population Covid death rate that relies on severely inflated (official) Covid numbers incorporating the missing flu and untold other causes of death such as stress related deaths due to underlying health issues aggravated by lock-downs, Covid related policies pushing people into poverty & higher mortality, America’s staggering problem with obesity (Covid kills obese people in high numbers), attrition in America’s exploding homeless population et cetera. These numbers won’t be properly sorted before years of study but in the meanwhile a highly politicized (Dr ‘Faustus’ driven) Covid panic-power grab dishonestly lumps everything together.

As pointed out by Wilcot, the official USA numbers (that don’t add up) are consistent with what is observed in the United Kingdom’s data. It should be expected this will be the case elsewhere.

Back to Serbia:

If we take the ‘official’ Covid death rate 0.9% or 4,700 deaths (necessarily includes the ‘missing’ flu and other untold manner of death) and rather than apply this to what should be called ‘the includes false positives aggregate’ or 516,000 (reported positives) and instead apply this official death statistic (4,700) attributed to Covid to the 8,700,000 population of Serbia as whole (includes untested & tested negative) to arrive at 0.05%, it is only then a flat national death rate (no significant statistical increase) for the ‘pandemic’ year 2020 begins to make sense because it is only then we can understand what happened to the ‘missing’ flu and other, untold manner of death. They’ve been folded into the Covid statistic. There is no other straightforward explanation. [5]

Now that ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Banson Wilcot PhD is vindicated, let’s shortly note one other article at the ‘offending’ site Principia Scientific International on Covid: the article by another PhD (psychology), Dr Elsa Schieder, on Ivermectin. In short, she simply states what is known to be a scientifically established fact; Ivermectin cures Covid, except in those states that suppress this information about an effective, generic (cheap) drug that should render the vaccine hysteria moot. [6], [7]

The inescapable conclusion is that Covid, although real, and in some cases deadly, is not nearly so lethal on a societal-wide basis as it is presented to us, and need not be nearly so lethal as it presently is. The obvious question is why?

Social Analysis

Firstly, in Western cultures particularly, people lie to themselves, especially when it comes to pecuniary interests versus altruism. There is big money in addressing Covid as a (blown out of proportion) ‘pandemic’ and self importance takes on altruism as a lie (self deceit of doing the right thing) when in fact it is the pecuniary interests (money is power) driving the urge to control. So, the Covid ‘pandemic’ is not as much a conspiracy to control populations (even as strategies are devised to do this) as much as it is a self-importance inflating, power driven meme.

Western style politicians (taking bait from the sociopath oligarchs fishing for them with lobbyists) are narcissists, and narcissists are those personality constructs which are most prone to self deceits. In lay terms, it should be said our leaders are self-aggrandizing morons incapable of comprehending the damage they are causing is by far worse than the damage which should happen if they were to step out of the way, stop politicizing medicine and let the community doctors do their job with a full set of Covid facts available to them (e.g. treat with Ivermectin.)

Insofar as the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International, well, in fact it harbors an Islamophobe associated personality like the Dr Elsa Schieder mentioned above, who it just happens provided accurate information on Ivermectin, together with any number of other trained scientists who do not (for whatever reasons) find a place in mainstream to have a voice. What does it say about Western culture when searching for the better information, one finds it at a site that is not entirely wholesome? How is that somehow more damning than the Western media lies we are fed every day by corporate entities protecting the interests of Western oligarchs and their corrupt self (and societal-wide) political deceits concerning Covid, leading to unnecessary loss of life?

[1] https://principia-scientific.com/uk-covid-conundrum-the-mysterious-case-of-disappearing-flu/

[2] https://knoema.com/atlas/Serbia/Death-rate

[3] https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22272237/flu-cases-down-historic-what-does-it-mean

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3313670-serbian-government-to-adopt-stricter-covid-measures-upper-elementary-school-grades-switch-online

[6] https://principia-scientific.com/ivermectin-miracle-drug-against-covid-19/

[7] https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Read in English

Facebook, Twitter i Youtube (‘veliki momci’), svi u ulozi vratara:

„Rat protiv „dezinformacija“ zahteva dve žrtve. Istinu. I pravo na lečenje.“

@ https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

Arhiva (1) https://archive.li/tXJNW

Arhiva (2) https://archive.li/gmm3N (Čitajte na srpskom)

Piše Meri Bet Fajfer
Trenutno se vode dve bitke za javno zdravlje.

Prva je, naravno, protiv koronavirusa.

Druga cilja u široku i amorfnu ​​metu zvanu „medicinske dezinformacije“. Cilj ove kampanje je da, barem delimično, kontroliše šta ljudi čitaju, vide i znaju o potencijalnim tretmanima KOVIDA-19. Nepokolebljivo na svom nišanu ima jedan jeftini, generički lek koji bi mogao preokrenuti ovu pandemiju, ivermektin.

U ovoj drugoj borbi,YouTube video snimci su uklonjeni. Twitter nalozi sa hiljadama pratilaca su ugašeni. Facebook objave i grupe su nestale. Ovo su očigledna dela cenzure ivermektina i drugih mogućnosti za lečenje.

Malo je prikrivenija odbojnost glavnih medija prema izveštavanju o praktično bilo čemu što obećava lečenje KOVID-a u ranoj fazi bolesti, uključujući 42 studije koje zajednički kažu da bi ivermektin mogao smanjiti smrtnost od KOVID-a za 75 do 83 procenta. Ono malo što se izveštava je da je ivermektin eksperimentalan i nedokazan – lek koji se koristi za lečenje šuge i rečnog slepila kod ljudi i parazita na konjima.

Možda je iz tih razloga Šeril Džeret (64), u početku, odbila predlog svog lekara da uzima ivermektin, kada joj je dijagnostifikovao nešto što je izgledalo kao blagi slučaj KOVID-a. Predomislila se trećeg dana, kada se borila za dah nakon što se popela stepenicama, a snimak je pokazao da je KOVID zahvatio 25 posto njenih pluća.

„Uzela sam ga“, rekla mi je. „U roku od 2 sata bila sam dobro.“ Ponovo je pokušala da se popenje stepenicama. Bez problema.

Mnogo je priča poput Džeretove. Nećete ih naći u štampi ili na Vikipediji, uobičajenom izvoru informacija o ivermektinu. Podelite ih na Facebook-u i možda će vam zabraniti objavljivanje, što se nedavno dogodilo lekaru Džeretove, Brusu Borosu.

Kontrola poruka o ivermektinu se navodno vrši pod paravanom zaštite javnog zdravlja. Ali umesto toga, prema intervjuima sa advokatima, lekarima i analitičarima ovaj napor ima suprotan efekat,.

„Vodi se rat protiv dezinformacija koji šteti dobrim informacijama“, rekao je dr Pjer Kori, predsednik grupe lekara koji zagovaraju lek nazvan Frontline KOVID-19 Udruženje intenzivne nege ili FLCCC. „Imamo sve podatke koji pokazuju korist ivermektina kada je u pitanju velika smrtnost. Što se manje o tome zna, to je više smrtnih slučajeva. “

Gde je sve počelo
Pokušaj upravljanja informacijama o lečenju KOVID-a svoje korene delimično vuče iz tužnog poglavlja američke nauke i novinarstva: Trampova podrška prošlog proleća hidroksihlorokinu (HCQ). U trenu je lečenje u ranoj fazi pretvoreno u desničarski mit koji zanima samo Fox News. Ostatak štampe je nemilosrdno ponavljao tvrdnje da je pouzdani farmaceutski proizvod koji se koristi za nekoliko bolesti opasan za KOVID. Mnogo studija je to pobilo i pokazalo delotvornost u ranoj fazi bolesti, što većina ljudi ne zna. Dr Mobin Sajed bio je među prvima, marta prošle godine, koji je istražio potencijal HCQ-a u YouTube video snimku koji je postao viralan i doveo ga u žižu podele na one koji ga vole i one koji ga mrze, na desnicu i levicu. „Počeo sam da primam toliko pretnji“, rekao je, što ga je podstaklo da sam ukloni objavu.

Posle toga, međutim, YouTube je sam odlučio šta bi trebalo da vidi 250.000 pratilaca Medicinskih predavanja Drbeen, uklanjajući prinudno video zapise o vitaminu D, remdesiviru i, što su drugi rekli da je često bilo cenzurisano, ivermektinu.

Drugi primeri ovog novog trenda cenzurisanja:

* 31. januara Facebook je uklonio stranicu pod nazivom „Ivermectin for MDs Team“, sa 10.200 članova iz više od 100 zemalja. Poslednja kap koja je prelila čašu bila je objava o odluci slovačkog Ministarstva zdravlja da dozvoli upotrebu ivermektina, za koji cenzori Fejsbuka „veruju da je štetan za fizički integritet“, napisao je administrator. Facebook je takođe presudio da su vesti o odobrenju ivermektina od strane južne države u Brazilu kršile njegove standarde. Drugim rečima, gigantu društvenih medija nisu se svidele odluke dve nezavisne vlade i smatrao je da on zna bolje.

* 12. januara, Twitter je presudio da je tvit brazilskog Ministarstva zdravlja – 1,2 miliona pratilaca – „širio obmanjujuće i potencijalno štetne informacije“. Zašto? Pozivao je ljude sa simptomima KOVID-a da „odu u zdravstvenu jedinicu i zatraže rano lečenje“.

* Još nečuvenije, YouTube je nedavno izbrisao dva video zapisa koja je objavio komitet američkog Senata o svedočenju dr Kori o ivermektinu. Dalje, uklonio je video u kojem je naučnik govorio o svom prikazu ivermektina kao delu projekta agencije Unitaid čiji je domaćin Svetska zdravstvena organizacija. YouTube je čak uklonio video zapis o svojoj cenzuri ivermektina.

U nagoveštaju koliko je velika cenzura, Facebook je ponosno potvrdio u objavi na vebsajtu 8. februara da je „uklonio više od 12 miliona objava na Facebook-u i Instagramu koji sadrže dezinformacije koje mogu dovesti do neizbežne fizičke štete“. Sedam mojih postova, o članku koji sam napisala sa višestrukim linkovima ka naučnim objašnjenjima o ivermektinu, bilo je pogođeno tom oznakom. (Dospela sam na 14-satnu zabranu objavljivanja).

Moji napori da Facebook, Twitter ili Google, koji poseduje YouTube, daju objašnjenje metodologije koju koriste za cenzuru, ostali su jalovi. U javnoj objavi YouTube kaže da ne dozvoljava informacije koje su „u suprotnosti sa lokalnim zdravstvenim vlastima“ i Svetskom zdravstvenom organizacijom. Twitter tvrdi da uklanja „sadržaj koji je očigledno lažan ili obmanjujući i može dovesti do značajnog rizika nanošenja štete“.

Ali ko zapravo odlučuje o videu ili postu? Da li odluke donose algoritmi koje su podesili tehničari ili naučnici i lekari? Da li smernice vlade treba da budu krajnje merilo kada se ove stvari razvijaju – ponekad i pogrešno?

Na početku KOVID-a, zvaničnici su zapravo savetovali da se ne nose maske i da se KOVID ne leči kortikosteroidima; sada su to uobičajene prakse koje spasavaju živote.

Štaviše, vladine odluke u prethodnoj pošasti pokazuju koliko vlade mogu biti sklone greškama. Godine 1987. aktivisti za HIV-AIDS molili su dr Entonija Faučija da odobri upotrebu Bactrima i drugih sulfa lekova za sprečavanje virulentne upale pluća povezane sa AIDS-om. Vlada je čekala dve godine na dodatne podatke, tokom kojih je, kako je Šon Strab u svojim memoarima „Brojanje tela“ prebrojao, umrlo 17.000 ljudi.

Ono što je Fauči tada želeo, i želi i danas, je veća, bolja, dobro osmišljena studija – čak i ako je rezultat čekanja veći broj preminulih.

Stiv Kirš, kalifornijski preduzetnik, finansirao je istraživanje o antidepresivu koji se pretvorio u anti-KOVID tretman nazvan fluvoksamin i koji uveliko obećava zaustavljanje KOVID-a u ranoj fazi. Kao i kod ivermektina, lek nailazi na otpor.

U članku objavljenom 26. februara na Quora, Kirš je argumentovao da se granica za prihvatanje već odobrenih lekova mora spustiti, s obzirom na njihovu poznatu sigurnost i efikasnost. „Danas imamo lečenja zasnovana na dokazima koja imaju veliku verovatnoću da značajno smanje hospitalizaciju i smrt … praktično bez povećanja rizika“, napisao je. „Stoga su pogrešni i bespotrebni gubici života zbog „čekanja na više podataka “.“ Naveo je da su fluvoksamin i ivermektin dva najperspektivnija leka za lečenje KOVID-a u ranoj fazi bolesti.

Veliki Brat na Delu
Twitter je 27. decembra suspendovao nalog pod nazivom @COVIDAnalysis, koji je pratilo skoro 7.000 ljudi. Taj nalog, koji su vodili anonimni naučnici, rutinski je objavio tvit o istraživanju lečenja KOVID-a, i nastavio da rezimira i analizira njegove implikacije na svom vebsajtu.

Nisam usamljena u oslanjanju na njegovo poučno tumačenje, koje ponekad stane u zaštitu, a ponekad kritikuje.
Twitter nije pružio nikakvo upozorenje pre gašenja naloga i od tada nije odgovorio na zahtev grupe za objašnjenjem. Komentar jednog pratioca @c19d3k2, „Zaista moram da se zapitam koliko smo blizu same ivice #1984 već sada.“

Ugašeni su i drugi nalozi, uključujući onaj istaknutog i pristalice hidroksihlorokina u ranoj fazi, dr Zeva Zelenka, koji je imao više od 150.000 pratilaca.

Na trenutak ostavite po strani implikacije napora da se kontroliše ono što Amerikanci i građani širom sveta znaju – o bilo čemu. Ne tako davno, takva kontrola je bila nezamisliva.

Sada uzmite u obzir da je ivermektin lek koji je odobrila FDA i koji se nalazi na listi osnovnih lekova SZO. Među više od tri desetine ispitivanja nalazi se 19 recenziranih studija i 21 randomizovano kontrolisano ispitivanje. Oni pokazuju da ivermektin deluje u različitim fazama protiv virusa SARS-CoV-2. Zaustavio je infekciju prehlade kod zdravstvenih radnika u tri argentinske studije i jednoj u kojoj je učestvovalo 4.000 ljudi u Indiji. Zaustavio je bolest u ranoj fazi u studijama iz Pakistana i Bangladeša. Održao je ljude u životu u Egiptu i u studiji u okrugu Brauard, na Floridi.
Lekari to uglavnom ne znaju. Ni šira javnost.

Pronašla sam previše primera cenzure lečenja u ranoj fazi da bih ih sve ovde nabrojala, uključujući brisanje Facebook grupe sa 4.000 članova pod nazivom COVEXIT.com koja često raspravlja o hidroksihlorokinu i uklanjanje popularnog video zapisa dr Kristi Rizinger koja moli regulatorna tela da razmotre naučne činjenice o ivermektinu. Ipak, zamračenje sigurno nije potpuno. Na YouTube-u, Facebook-u i Twitter-u još uvek ima puno podataka o ivermektinu.

Ali cenzorski nož, prikaz leka kao konstrukcije desnice i otpor medija da izveštavaju o bilo čemu vezanom za lečenje u ranoj fazi uzeli su danak. Čini se da je ivermektin neprihvatljiv u javnoj raspravi o lečenju KOVID-a u ranoj fazi bolesti. Evo kako se ovo odvija: Tri izveštaja za štampu istraživala su bezbrojne faktore koji redukuju KOVID u Indiji – NPR (National Public Radio), Wall Street Journal i Washington Post. Pa ipak, upadljivo je da niko od njih nije pomenuo lečenje, uprkos široko rasprostranjenoj indijskoj upotrebi ivermektina i hidroksihlorokina, što je sigurno zaslužilo raspravu.

Pitala sam nadaleko objavljivanu naučnu spisateljicu Ester Landuis o njenim razmišljanjima o ovome: „Generalno se čini da je prepolitizovani debakl sa hidroksihlorokinom pomutio vode glavnim naučnim časopisima“, rekla mi je. „Mnogi se plaše da pogreše u vezi sa još jednim lekom kome bi bila promenjena namena; čekaju konačne podatke iz faze tri RCT (randomizovanog kontrolisanog ispitivanja) sa hiljadama pacijenata.“

Rezime prećutkivanja
Istraživanje ivermektina pokazuje da je lek najefikasniji u sprečavanju i zaustavljanju infekcije u ranoj fazi – upotreba koja će doprineti da ljudi ne završe u bolnici i sprečiti simptome na duge staze. Ipak, cenzura ivermektina lišava pacijente lečenja sigurnim lekom koji bi mogao da se koristi za tu namenu i uz informisani pristanak. Mnogi lekovi se koriste na ovaj način, posebno u odeljenjima za intenzivnu negu, gde se pacijentima može davati desetak lekova u nadi da će neki delovati.

Ali zatražite ivermektin za člana porodice i verovatno će vam reći, kao što je rečeno jednom članu porodice pacijenta: „Ovde to ne koristimo“. Kao posledica toga, porodice hospitalizovanih pacijenata ponekad ulažu velike napore da bi ga dobili.

Porodica muškarca iz Teksasa (67) planirala je da mu prošvercuje ivermektin u hrani, a zatim su dali advokatu da interveniše da se obezbedi lek. Dve porodice iz države Njujork dobile su sudske naloge kojima se ženama, starim 80 i 65 godina, dozvoljava davanje ivermektina – ali da im prepišu samo njihovi lični lekari. Kada je dr Erika Espinoza mislila da će izgubiti muža – takođe lekara – zbog KOVIDA-19, sredila je da ga prebaci u bolnicu u Hjustonu (odbilo ju je šest vazdušnih kompanija za hitnu pomoć), zato što primenjuje protokol koji uključuje ivermektin. Malo bolnica primenjuje takav protokol.

U ta četiri slučaja, svi osim muškarca iz Teksasa, oporavili su se nakon što su dobili ivermektin, a odlaganje lečenja njime sigurno nije pomoglo. Njegova smrt 5. februara razorila je njegovu porodicu; ostavio je suprugu sa kojom je bio 40 godina, dva sina i snahe i šestoro unučadi.
Doktor Brus Boros, lekar Šeril Džeret i vlasnik tri centra za hitnu negu u Florida Kis, nedavno je odslužio ono što on i drugi nazivaju „Facebook zatvorom“, naišavši na cenzore ivermektina. To je, međutim, mačji kašalj za Borosa, koji je lečio jednog hospitalizovanog pacijenta Kajla Kartera, kome je isporučio ivermektin do kreveta i uputio ga telefonom koliko treba da uzme. (Bolnica je rekla da nije imala lek, a zatim je odložila davanje, dok se Karter borio da diše).

„U roku od 12 sati,“ rekao mi je Karter, „osećao sam se prilično fantastično. Znao sam da se nešto promenilo.“ Još uvek ne zna da li je bolnica znala da je uzimao ivermektin.

Dve stotine pacijenata kasnije, Boros kaže sledeće: „Ako vam lekar ovo ne da, potražite drugog lekara“.

Kao da je to tako lako.

***Meri Bet Fajfer je istraživački novinar i autor dve knjige. Njena web stranica: http://www.thefirstepidemic.com.

Imajte na umu da su stavovi izraženi u ovom članku mišljenje autora i ne nužno stav kompanije TrialSite News LLC.

[1] https://c19ivermectin.com/

[2] https://www.ijidonline.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1201-9712%2820%2932235-9

[3] https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

[4] https://about.fb.com/news/2021/02/reaching-billions-of-people-with-covid-19-vaccine-information/

[5] https://trialsitenews.com/not-using-ivermectin-one-year-in-is-unethical-and-immoral/

[6] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295

[7] https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Body-Counts/Sean-Strub/9781451661965

[8] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2773108?resultClick=24

[9] https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-cure-for-COVID-19/answer/Steve-Kirsch?share=1

[10] https://c19study.com/

[11] https://c19ivermectin.com/twitter.html

[12] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04701710

[13] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-208785/v1

[14] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3734478

[15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220325066

[16] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v3

[17] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369220348984/pdf

[18] https://covexit.com/facebook-takes-down-our-group/

[19] https://buffalonews.com/news/local/2nd-wny-hospital-ordered-to-treat-covid-19-patient-with-experimental-drug/article_f32339f0-5d01-11eb-b752-4f8966804581.html#tracking-source=in-article

 

*

iRNK: „To je genska terapija, a ne vakcina“

Kovid vs grip: Gde je kosa, alatka Smrti, u 2020-2021?

*

Srbija

“We see 100,000 ukrop troops on the Front, scores of trainloads of troops, armor, ammo and fuel moved into the Donbass region, we hear the heated rhetoric, the preparations for war on both sides of the info sphere”

Or so states my well connected source in Donbass, speaking of activities on either side of the (momentarily) ‘frozen’ conflict. Never mind the Ukrainian military has been shelling the ethnic Russian ‘separatists’ with heavy artillery for weeks (a small detail neglected in Western press.)

When the shit hits the fan on the Donbass (Eastern Ukraine) battlefields again, it will be  a ‘surprise’ and no doubt posed in Western press as a pre-planned ‘act of treachery’ by the ‘Perennially evil Putin’ in the next gambit of the ‘Great Game’ by empire (NATO.)

NATO actually doesn’t give a rats ass for Ukraine other than to use the dumber than f**k nazis (they’d put in charge in the 2014 coup) as cannon fodder to injure & make Russia into a boogeyman. Götterdämmerung? Well, the Western states running with a 19th Century empire mentality in a highly unstable 21st Century always poses the possibility but probably not (yet.) The European NATO states are in no shape to take on Russia, never-minding Russia has no inclination to reoccupy Europe. Of course, as well Russia cannot stand by and allow Kiev to run over the ethnic Russian majority East of the Dnieper river and open to NATO a corridor on the border of Russia’s European heartland. Russia WILL defend the Donbass.

Everyone knows (West & East) that Ukraine is not a viable state as constituted; the Western (Ruthenian) people (especially along the border with Poland) have been long subverted away from their Orthodox roots and are unrecognizable as the same ethnic people (Rusyn) in Belarus, Hungary, Serbia and trans-Carpathia in Ukraine. These people (Ruthenian-Rusyn) have been targeted by cultural subversion for a couple of hundred years in Catholic associated empire (Habsburg, et al) efforts to wrest their identity away from Kievian Rus and ethnic/cultural kinship with Russia. There is  really little new in this; a historical inheritance predating the Nazi proper invasion and predating Napoleon’s invasion of Russia back to the Swedish invasion at the beginning of the 18th Century. Western empire in several incarnations have coveted Russia for over three centuries, and the Western Ukrainians (ethnic Ruthenians, actually) would be naturally aligned with the Polish who’d Catholicized them and it should come as little surprise these people sided with the Nazis (proper) in WWII because they cannot be rehabilitated in any sense of coexistence with Russia and Russians.

It is in the region of the Polish border where the Ukrainian (Nazi collaborator) Stephan Bandera nazi element/legacy is absolutely entrenched (formerly Orthodox but now ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholics answering to Rome), a community deeply saturated with antipathy to Russia and these ‘people’ (if they can recalled that) will never integrate to a Ukraine of the East with its majority ethnic Russian (Orthodox) population. Both sides (NATO/Russia) know this.

Rather than negotiate a reasonable divorce that would split Ukraine into two states with the Dnieper River as the rough boundary (Kiev and Odessa should be in the East) along ethnic lines, NATO simply intends the inevitable Ukraine breakup will happen in such a way as to make Russia into the Western Press’ boogeyman.

I doubt it’s going to lead to WWIII, Europe isn’t ready for this war, it’ll likely just work out as an expensive exercise to make Russia into the villain, little more than that. How much territory Russia will take will depend on kinetic developments to some extent… but I expect Kiev and Odessa could easily be annexed to Russia (perhaps later divided between Russia and a ‘proper’ Ukraine.) There’s possibility of a triple partition; in general terms an ethnic Ruthenian Western (Poland border area) ‘nazified’ sector nobody will want, a central sector populated in majority by proper ethnic Ukrainians and East of the Dnieper which is largely ethnic Russian majority.

The nazis (literally represented in Azov Battalion et al) will begin their offensive and the Russian army will outflank the Donbass front and cut off the Ukrainian supply lines (taking Kiev in the process) and NATO, after having pumped in enough weapons and munitions to insure a bloodbath, will allow the Ukrainian military to be crushed. This will be the West’s convenient means of disposing of the most radical (out of the closet) nazis, a big no-no (the 21st Century’s nazi meme in the guise of NATO disallows flying any flag except the false flag of democracy.)

No matter the immense amount of casualties this will cause, ‘the more blood the better’ from the Western intelligence agencies propaganda apparatchiks point of view as the entire Western world is propagandized concerning ‘Evil Putin’ and ‘crude Russian aggression.’ Thus, the de facto split of Ukraine is accomplished in a comic strip written by Satan where Western Ukraine (what Russia won’t care to absorb) will be propped up by the West with psychologically infantile territorial claim over a Russian population they had terrorized since February 2014.

Russia will be compelled to defend the Donbass, but for appearances (international law) sake, will have to let the nazis initiate the war, resulting in much higher casualties. ‘Preemptive War’ is an international law oxymoron embraced solely by lawless regimes and adhering to the law is a disadvantage Russia will overcome in it’s impatience that finally decides the most economical means of settling the issue is to evict the nazis altogether from territory East of the Dnieper. Of course the West’s propagandists will take this opportunity to convince its gullible populations ‘Russia’s aggression’ justifies immense, new and limitless armaments purchases in a spiraling out of control geopolitical tension that must inevitably lead to the West’s Götterdämmerung after all.

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

When greed supersedes racism, suddenly, ‘everyone is a nigger.’ Trump’s manipulated ‘white trash’ or ‘crackers’ had failed to understand it is identical underlying force, greed, and greed’s attending model of exploitation, had been the origin of chattel slavery that now underwrites the collapse of the blue collar, white middle class. We shouldn’t blame Trump for creating the conditions creating a new class of honky crackers (globalism did that) but certainly Trump exploited their ‘hope’ when he surrounded himself with world class criminal sociopaths on the extreme right of the 1% (the 2019 Trump cabinet included 17 millionaires, 2 one hundred million plus millionaires and 1 billionaire; altogether worth $3.2 billion.) Any expectation this crew would have sacrificed any portion of their fortunes (via profit losses) by reinvesting in the USA rather than cheap, outsourced labor, is fantasy par excellence. We’re all ‘niggers’ now, not to mention ‘useless eaters.’

What has manifest since Bill Clinton deregulated the American economy is a form of 21st Century slavery that doesn’t give a damn for the color of your skin and it doesn’t matter to any of the 1% whether your ‘master’ is on the left or right. Just don’t hurt the bottom line (profit) because the underlying motive is ‘all you stupid white niggers, if the global 1% can get you all fighting with (the dumber than fuck) antifa, as well as hating blacks, Mexicans, kulaks and chinks, we’ll never have to worry about y’all getting together to throw us out.’ So, listen up, whitey, here’s the what and how behind the modern rendition of what’s happening to you, with a relevant thumbnail history:

When America’s ‘European morality’ had ‘matured’ and the abolition of slavery became a political expediency of Abraham Lincoln…

“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that”

…following the war which ‘saved the union’, ’emancipation’ was morphed into 100 years of ‘Jim Crow era’ where freed slaves and their descendants were denied voting rights and were literally “barbecued” or lynched after having been tortured to death, sometimes burned alive or dragged to death, with large attending crowds photographed with the dead  victims at these events made into postcards that were delivered by the United States Postal Service.

In fact Lincoln (and his successors) didn’t give a rat’s ass for the civil rights of blacks, he just wanted (and did) what was necessary to keep his political power intact while serving an industrialized North with it’s own system of chattel exploitation (keep reading.)

Abandoning their ’40 acres and a mule’ (a sort of compensation towards a ‘new’ post-slavery life) in droves, over six million blacks fled the South’s ‘crackermania’, migrating to cities in the West and North of the USA where they took the bait of the industrial corporations offers of factory work; that is, until the factories were no longer profitable and the corporations abandoned these communities to their own devices with little opportunity at community advancement or even sustaining what they’d gained in the short term. Locked into a subsequent social prejudice driven poverty with menial labor afforded to the LUCKY ONES, that’s the short history leading to America’s ‘black slums.’ Nobody with the political power to repair this actually gave a damn, they were all bought then, little different to now.

That’s the principle, in short, of what drives today’s globalism and makes everyone poor, regardless of color of skin. Corporations have taken their capital out of America’s communities to invest in cheaper labor abroad and the white working class is collapsing into the same poverty that had been the experience of the black communities previous to this. Now, how’s it feel to be the ‘nigger’? And it doesn’t stop there, because when they decide you’re too much burden, or think you’re becoming ‘uppity’, they’ll ‘barbecue’ you too (little different to any hellfire missile launched outside the empire’s “homeland”)

Maybe, just maybe, whitey, y’all should look at setting some history aside and begin negotiating some détente and political alliances with black people in the lower middle class communities you should be grateful hadn’t adopted the attitude of ‘the only good cracker is a dead cracker.’ From there alliances might be bridged deeper into those ghettos with a seething anger at what had happened to them and what is now happening to you. Nobody has to be in love, only reasoned, civil and fair.

The concluding reality is, if the 1% are Sneetches decorated with stars, and Trump is a Sneetch with a star, what Trump actually promised you, that is recovering the short lived ‘golden age’ of the white America of the 1950s, that horse has bolted the barn. It ain’t coming back and the Sneetches with stars who stole it from you aren’t going to share the wealth because criminals don’t voluntarily surrender their business models. Whatever opportunities might exist aren’t going to manifest from nostalgia; and they won’t manifest at all so long as the filthy rich can keep you all hating, divided and fighting from a stance of ignorance.

A closing note would be to the crackers’ adversaries, that is libtards in general, Black Lives Matter (shouldn’t all life matter?) and antifa; insofar as the one percent millionaire and de facto President Harris using you like the idiots you are, you’re dumber than this cracker portrayed wondering at a life in a world that never did exist and never will exist:

She’s an incarceration queen chosen by corporate boards to protect their wealth from you, anyone and everyone, end of story. Maybe all you libtards should look at opening a dialogue with the ‘crackers’ … because if you were actually ‘woke’ you’d understand we’re all niggers now.

*

Some serious reading:

[1] https://www.abhmuseum.org/one-hundred-years-of-jim-crow/

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-17/this-map-of-u-s-lynchings-spans-1835-to-1964

[3] https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2019/07/25/the-definitive-net-worth-of-donald-trumps-cabinet/?sh=1fcf913c6a15

[4] https://www.opensecrets.org/personal-finances/Kamala-Harris/assets?cid=N00036915&year=2018

[5] https://nypost.com/2020/08/12/inside-kamala-harris-polarizing-record-as-a-prosecutor/

%d bloggers like this: