Archives for category: propaganda

Note by this blog author would be, and you can quote me: “I hate Donald Trump. I believe he is a scum-bag in his own right (the Roy Cohn factor) and was altogether too willing to perform political fellatio on the worst of the criminal element in the religious right (the Coe cult ‘mikes’ factor represented in Pence-Pompeo) as well as sucking up to the world-class international criminal actor Bibi Netanyahu. On the other hand, I should say Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are equally evil in their own right. This re-posted article captures the reasons why, never-mind Trump himself, I DO NOT despise Trump supporters, not that I love them all, and most certainly I do not admire the vast majority of Biden/Harris supporters whose civics education (constitutional ethics) seems to have somehow gone missing at best, or have been discarded as ‘inconvenient’ at worst. Many of the conservative but snookered voters are law abiding and principled people, as well, many of the liberal voters in denial are not.”

**

NOTE FROM GLENN GREENWALD: On Friday, a relatively obscure Twitter user with fewer than 7,000 followers — posting under the pseudonym MartyrMade — posted one of the most mega-viral threads of the year. Over the course of thirty-five tweets, the writer, a podcast host whose real name is Darryl Cooper, set out to explain the mindset that has led so many Trump supporters to believe that the 2020 election was fraudulent and, more generally, to lose faith and trust in most U.S. institutions of authority.

Numerous journalists, including me, promoted the thread as one of the most insightful analyses yet published explaining the animating convictions underlying the MAGA movement. That night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson devoted a seven-minute segment to doing nothing more than reading Cooper’s thread. At the CPAC conference on Sunday, former President Donald Trump explicitly recommended the thread using Cooper’s name. In the last four days, Cooper’s Twitter account has gained more than 70,000 followers. Clearly, this thread resonated strongly with that political faction as a true and important explanation of how many MAGA voters have come to understand the world.

For our Outside Voices freelance section, we asked Cooper to elaborate on his influential thread, with a focus on what led him to these observations about prevailing MAGA sentiments and why he believes they are important for people to understand. As Cooper notes, he does not share all of the perceptions and beliefs he is conveying, although he shares many of them. Instead, based on the recognition that most media outlets are incapable of understanding let alone accurately describing the views of a group of people they view with little more than unmitigated contempt, condescension and scorn, he believes it is imperative that people understand the actual reality of what is motivating so many Trump voters in their views, perception and beliefs — regardless of whether each particular belief is accurate or not.

We also believe this understanding is vital, which is why we are happy to publish Cooper’s essay. It should go without saying that, as it true of all of our articles published on Outside Voices — which we treat as an op-ed page — our publishing of this article does not signify agreement with all of its claims, but only our belief that it is a viewpoint worth airing.

By Darryl Cooper

I quit Twitter last August. Quit for good. Other than posting links to two new episodes of my podcast, I stayed away for eight months and didn’t regret a thing. Around mid-June I let myself be persuaded that social media engagement was part of having a podcast, so I dipped back in, promising myself I’d avoid being pulled into politics. Things haven’t gone as planned.

The temptation was disguised cleverly as a conversation with a friend’s mother. She was visiting from upstate New York and we got to talking while my buddy was in the house tending to my goddaughter. She’s a hardcore Trumper from a less cynical generation that believes what she hears from sources she trusts. She’d been hounding her son about the stolen election all week, and he’d been trying to disabuse her of various theories involving trucked-in ballots and hacked counting machines. Now she had me cornered and put the question to me: “Do YOU think the election was legit?” So I told her the truth: I don’t know.

By the time my friend had put the baby to bed and rejoined us, we were waist-deep in a discussion about what happened last year, and she was satisfied that I was on her side. “See?!? He (she meant me) knows what’s going on! I’m not crazy. He’s smart, and HE knows!” My friend pulled the Captain Picard facepalm, and said, “Darryl, what the f*ck are you telling her?”

What I told her was some version of the Twitter thread Tucker Carlson read on air Friday night and which President Trump, using my name, then explicitly promoted in his speech to CPAC on Sunday, which has blown my inbox, and my promise to stay away from politics, to smithereens.

I told her I didn’t know much about the ballots, or the voting machines, or some company that she’d heard had ties to Venezuela. I didn’t follow Sidney Powell, or Lin Wood, or the details of the cases proceeding through the system. I think it was around the time Rudy Giuliani chose a landscape & gardening emporium as the location for a press conference on what would have been the greatest political scandal in American history that I made the conscious decision to stop paying attention. Or maybe it was the dripping hair dye, or something about a kraken — it’s all sort of blended together these days.

But I felt for her. She wasn’t the first person with whom I’d had the discussion, and I felt for all of them. I’ve had the discussion often enough that I feel comfortable extracting a general theory about where these people are coming from.

RUSSIAGATE: THE ORIGINAL SIN

Like my friend’s mother, most of them believe some or all of the theories involving fraudulent ballots, voting machines, and the rest. Scratch the surface and you’ll find that they’re not particularly attached to any one of them. The specific theories were almost a kind of synecdoche, a concrete symbol representing a deeply felt, but difficult to describe, sense that whatever happened in 2020, it was not a meaningfully democratic presidential election. The counting delays, the last-minute changes to election procedures, the unprecedented coordinated censorship campaign by Big Tech in defense of Biden were all understood as the culmination of the pan-institutional anti-Trump campaign they’d watched unfold for over four years.

Many of them deny it now, but a lot of 2016 Trump voters were worried during the early stages of the Russia collusion investigation. True, the evidence seemed thin, and the very idea that the US & allied security apparatus would allow Trump to take office if they really thought he might be under Russian blackmail seemed a bit preposterous on its face. But to many conservatives in 2016 and early 2017, it seemed equally preposterous that the institutions they trusted, and even the ones they didn’t, would go all-in on a story if there wasn’t at least something to it. Imagine the consequences for these institutions if it turned out there was nothing to it.

We now know that the FBI and other intelligence agencies conducted covert surveillance against members of the Trump campaign based on evidence manufactured by political operatives working for the Clinton campaign, both before and after the election. We know that those involved with the investigation knew the accusations of collusion were part of a campaign “approved by Hillary Clinton… to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.” They might have expected such behavior from the Clintons — politics is a violent game and Hillary’s got a lot of scalps on her wall. But many of the people watching this happen were Tea Party types, in spirit if not in actual fact. They give their kids a pocket Constitution for their birthday. They have Yellow Ribbon bumper stickers, and fly the POW/MIA flag under the front-porch Stars and Stripes, and curl their lip at people who talk during the National Anthem at ballgames. They’re the people who believed their institutions when they were told Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. To them, the intel community using fake evidence (including falsified documents) to spy on a presidential campaign is a big deal.

It may surprise many liberals, but most conservative normies actually know the Russia collusion case front and back. A whole ecosystem sprouted up to pore over every new development, and conservatives followed the details as avidly as any follower of liberal conspiracy theorists Seth Abramson or Marcy Wheeler. When the world learned of the infamous meeting between Trump campaign officials and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, it seemed like a problem and many Trump supporters took it seriously. Deep down, even those who rejected the possibility of open collusion worried that one of Trump’s inexperienced family members, or else a sketchy operative glomming onto the campaign, might have done something that, whatever its real gravity, could be successfully framed in a manner to sway a dozen of John McCain’s friends in the Senate.

Then, Trump supporters learned that Veselnitskaya was working with Fusion GPS, the political research and PR firm used by the Clinton campaign to formulate and spread the collusion accusations. They learned that the anti-Clinton information that was supposed to be the subject of the notorious meeting was provided by the same firm. They learned that she’d had dinner with Glenn Simpson, the owner of Fusion GPS, both the day before, and the day after the meeting. Needless to say, Trump supporters were skeptical of Simpson’s claim that Veselnitskaya’s meeting with Trump campaign officials never came up during either of their dinner dates, given that the content of the meeting was alleged to be the very treasonous, impeachable crime his firm was being paid to investigate and publicize.

There’s no need to relive all the details of the Russia collusion scam. The point is that conservatives were following it all very closely, in real time, and they noticed when things didn’t add up. After James Comey told Fox News’ Bret Baier that, even at the time of their interview in April 2018, he didn’t know who had funded the Steele dossier, conservatives noticed when the December 2019 DOJ Inspector General’s report showed that he had been informed of the dossier’s provenance in October 2016. And they asked themselves: Why would he lie? Lying to investigators about one’s knowledge of or involvement in a potentially criminal act is often taken as consciousness of guilt.

This was the bone that stuck in conservatives’ craw throughout the two years of hysteria over Russia. Why would Comey lie about knowing where the dossier came from? Why would the people involved claim to have seen evidence that never seemed to materialize? If the point of the Special Counsel is to take the investigation out of the hands of line investigators to avoid the appearance of political influence, why staff the office with known partisans and the same FBI personnel who originated and oversaw the case? Why was the relationship between Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya and Fusion GPS being dismissed as irrelevant? Why were people who must know better continuing to insist that the Steele dossier was originally funded by Republicans long after the claim had been debunked? Why wasn’t the media asking even these most obvious questions? And why were they giving themselves awards for refusing to ask those questions, and viciously attacking journalists who did ask them? These journalists are intelligent people — at least they present that way on television. Is it possible that these questions simply had not occurred to them? It seemed unlikely.

Many Trump supporters reasoned that it was simply not possible to carry on this campaign without some degree of coordination. That coordination perhaps did not take place in smoke-filled rooms (though they weren’t ruling it out), but at least through incentives, pressure, and vague but certain threats all well-understood by people who moved about in the same professional and social class, and who complained that they could “smell the Trump support” when they were unfortunate enough to have to patronize a Wal-Mart.

If there was a time when Trump supporters feared Robert Mueller’s goon squad, that time had passed by the 2018 midterm elections. Conservatives knew by then the whole case was bunk, and they were salivating at the prospect of watching him get chopped up by the likes of Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes. And he did.

The collusion case wasn’t only used to damage Trump in the polls or distract from his political agenda. It was used as an open threat to keep people from working in the administration. Taking a job in the Trump administration meant having one’s entire life investigated for anything that could fill CNN’s anti-Trump content requirement for another few days, whether or not it held up to scrutiny. Many administration employees quit because they were being bankrupted by legal fees due to an investigation that was known by its progenitors to be a political operation. The Department of Justice, press, and government used falsehoods to destroy lives and actively subvert an elected administration almost from the start. Perhaps worst of all, some portion of the American population was driven to the edge of madness by two years of being told that American politics had become a real-life version of The Manchurian Candidate. And not by Alex Jones, but by intelligence chiefs and politicians, amplified by media organizations which threw every ounce of their accumulated credibility behind the insanity.

For two years, Trump supporters had been called traitors and Russian bots for casting ballots for “Vladimir Putin’s c*ck holster.” They’d been subjected to a two-year gaslighting campaign by politicians, government agencies, and elite media. It took real fortitude to stand up to the unanimous mockery and scorn of these powerful institutions. But those institutions had gambled their power and credibility, and they’d lost, and now Trump supporters expected a reckoning. When no reckoning was forthcoming – when the Greenwalds, and Taibbis, and Matés of the world were not handed the New York Times’ revoked Pulitzers for correctly and courageously standing against the tsunami on the biggest political story in years – these people shed many illusions about how power really operates in their country.

Trump supporters know – I think everyone knows – that Donald Trump would have been impeached and probably indicted if Robert Mueller had proven that he’d paid a foreign spy to gather damaging information on Hillary Clinton from sources connected to Russian intelligence and disseminate that information in the press. Many of Trump’s own supporters wouldn’t have objected to his removal if that had happened. Of course that is exactly what the Clinton campaign actually did, yet there were no consequences for it. Indeed, there has been almost no criticism of it.

Trump supporters had gone from worrying the collusion might be real, to suspecting it might be fake, to seeing proof that it was all a scam. Then they watched as every institution – government agencies, the press, Congressional committees, academia – blew right past it and gaslit them for another year. To this day, something like half the country still believes that Trump was caught red-handed engaging in treason with Russia, and only escaped a public hanging because of a DOJ technicality regarding the indictment of sitting presidents. Most galling, conservatives suspect that within a few decades liberals will use their command over the culture to ensure that virtually everyone believes it. This is where people whose political identities have for decades been largely defined by a naive belief in what they learned in civics class began to see the outline of a Regime that crossed not only partisan, but all institutional boundaries. They’d been taught that America didn’t have Regimes, but what else was this thing they’d seen step out from the shadows to unite against their interloper president?

THE ESTABLISHMENT UNITES

GOP propaganda still has many conservatives thinking in terms of partisan binaries. Even the dreaded RINO (Republican-In-Name-Only) slur serves the purposes of the party, because it implies that the Democrats represent an irreconcilable opposition. But many Trump supporters see clearly that the Regime is not partisan. They know that the same institutions would have taken opposite sides if it had been a Tulsi Gabbard vs. Jeb Bush election. It’s hard to describe to people on the Left, who are used to thinking of American government as a conspiracy and are weaned on stories about Watergate, COINTELPRO, and Saddam’s WMD, how shocking and disillusioning this was for people who encouraged their sons and daughters to go fight for their country when George W. Bush declared war on Iraq.

They could have managed the shock if it only involved the government. But the behavior of the press is what radicalized them. Trump supporters have more contempt for journalists than they have for any politician or government official, because they feel most betrayed by them. The idea that the corporate press is driven by ratings and sensationalism has become untenable over the last several years. If that were true, there’d be a microphone in the face of every executive branch official demanding to know what the former Secretary of Labor meant when he said that Jeffrey Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime these people are now seeing in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period.

This is profoundly disorienting. Again, we’re not talking about pre-2016 Greenwald readers or even Ron Paul libertarians, who swallowed half a bottle of red pills long ago. These are people who attacked Edward Snowden for “betraying his country,” and who only now are beginning to see that they might have been wrong. It’s not because the parties have been reversed, and it’s not because they’re bitter over losing. They just didn’t know. If any country is going to function over the long-term, not everyone can be a revolutionary. Most people have to believe what they’re told and go with the flow most of the time. These were those people. I’m pretty conservative by temperament, but most of my political friends are on the Left. I spend a good deal of our conversations simply trying to convince them that these people are not demons, and that this political moment is pregnant with opportunity.

Many Trump supporters don’t know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know with apodictic certainty that the press, the FBI, and even the courts would lie to them if they were. They have every reason to believe that, and it’s probably true. They watched the corporate press behave like animals for four years. Tens of millions of people will always see Brett Kavanaugh as a gang rapist, based on an unproven accusation, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of that. They helped lead a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered on the most deadly and destructive riots in decades.

Conservatives have always complained that the media had a liberal bias. Fine, whatever: they still thought the press would admit the truth if they were cornered. They don’t believe that anymore. What they’ve witnessed in recent years has shown them that the corporate press will say anything, do anything, to achieve a political objective, or simply to ruin someone they perceive as an opponent. Since my casual Twitter thread ended up in the mouths of Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump, I’ve received hundreds of messages from people saying that I should prepare to be targeted. Others don’t think that will happen, but even most of them don’t think it’s an irrational concern. We’ve seen an elderly lady receive physical threats after a CNN reporter accosted her at home to accuse her of aiding Kremlin disinformation ops. We’ve seen them threaten to dox someone for making a humorous meme.

Throughout 2020, the corporate press used its platform to excuse and encourage political violence. Time Magazine told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly conference calls involving – among others – leaders of the protests, local officials responsible for managing them, and members of the media charged with reporting on the events. They worked together with Silicon Valley to control the messaging about the ongoing crisis for maximum political effect. In case of a Trump victory, the same organization had protesters ready to be activated by text message in 400 cities the day after the election. Every town with a population over 50,000 would have been in for some pre-planned, centrally-controlled mayhem. In other countries we call that a color revolution.

Throughout the summer, establishment governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures, often over the protests of the state legislatures. It wasn’t only the mass mailing of live ballots: they also lowered signature matching standards, axed existing voter ID and notarization requirements, and more. Many people reading this might think those were necessary changes, either due to the virus or to prevent potential voter suppression. I won’t argue the point, but the fact is that the US Constitution states plainly that “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections… shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” As far as conservatives were concerned, state governors used COVID to unconstitutionally usurp their legislatures’ authority to unilaterally alter voting procedures just months before an election in order to help Biden make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system. Lawyers can argue over the legitimacy of the procedural modifications; the point is that conservatives believe in their bones – and I think they’re probably right – that the cases would have been treated differently, in both the media and in court, if the parties were reversed.

And then came the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. Liberals dismiss the incident because, after four years of obsessing over the activities of the Trump children, they insist they’re not interested in the behavior of the candidate’s family members. But this misses the point entirely. Big Tech ran a coordinated censorship campaign against a major American newspaper while the rest of the media spread base propaganda to protect a political candidate. And once again, the campaign crossed institutional boundaries, with dozens of former intelligence officials throwing their weight behind the baseless and now-discredited claim that the laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign. That lie was promoted by Big Tech companies, while the true information being reported by The New York Post about the laptop’s contents was suppressed. That is what happened.

Even the tech companies themselves now admit it was a “mistake” – Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said it was an error and apologized – but the election is over, Joe Biden has appointed Facebook’s government regulations executive as his ethics arbiter, so who cares, right? It hardly needs saying that if The New York Times had Donald Trump Jr.’s laptop, full of pictures of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama, and emails with pretty direct discussions of political corruption, the Paper of Record would not have had its accounts suspended for reporting on it. Let’s remember that stories of Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact across the media spectrum and used as the basis for a multi-year criminal investigation, when the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its primary source.

The reaction of Trump supporters to all this was not, “no fair!” That was how they felt about Romney’s “binders of women” in 2012 or Harry Reid’s lie that Romney paid no federal taxes. This is different. Now they were beginning to see, accurately, that the institutions of their country — all of them — had been captured by people prepared to use any means to exclude them from the political process. And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. Trump got 13 million more votes than in 2016 – 10 million more than Hillary Clinton had gotten.

As election day became election night and the tallies rolled in, Trump supporters allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark around midnight, they knew.

Over the following weeks, they were shuffled around between honest critics, online grifters, and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories. They latched onto one then another increasingly outlandish theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real, of which election day was only the culmination. Media and Big Tech did all they could to make things worse. Everything about the election was strange, confusing, and unprecedented – the changes to procedure, unprecedented mail-in voting, counting delays, etc – but rather than admit that and bring everything into the open, they banned discussion of it (even in private messages!), and launched an absurd propaganda campaign telling us that it was – I’m not making this up – the most well-run and secure election in American history.

Conservatives know – again, I think probably everyone knows – that just as Don Jr.’s laptop would have been the story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would have been taken very seriously. See 2016 for proof.

Even the judiciary had forfeited its credibility with these voters because of the opposition’s embrace of political violence. Trump supporters say, with good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he’ll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house? Maybe most judges would do their jobs, but given the events of the last four years it’s not an unreasonable concern, and the concern itself is enough to cast the whole system in doubt. Again, we know, thanks to Time Magazine, that riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump had won. Sure, they were “protests”, but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. The Chamber of Commerce took the threat of a second round of destruction of its members’ property seriously enough to offer its assistance to the “well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information” – Time’s words, not mine.

Trump voters were adamant that the governors’ changes to election procedures were unconstitutional. Everything in law is open to interpretation, but it doesn’t require a Harvard Law degree to read Article 1, Section 4 (quoted above) and come to that conclusion. But they also knew the cases wouldn’t see a courtroom until after the election, and what judge was going to make a ruling that would be framed as a judicial coup d’etat just because some governors didn’t go through the proper channels? Even a judge willing to accept the personal risk would have also to be willing to inflict the chaos that would follow on the country. Even a well-intentioned judge could convince himself that, whatever happened or didn’t happen, as a public servant he had no right to impose an opinion guaranteed to lead to mass violence – because the threat was not implied, it was direct. Some Trump supporters, unfortunately, thought the license for political violence applied to everyone; the hundreds of them now sitting in federal jails learned the hard way that it wasn’t true.

From the perspective of Trump’s supporters, the entrenched bureaucracy and security state subverted their populist president from day one. The natural guardrails of the Fourth Estate were removed because the press was part of the operation. Election rules were changed in an unconstitutional manner that could only be challenged after the deed was done, when judges and officials would be playing chicken with a direct threat of burning cities. Political violence was legitimized and encouraged. Major newspapers and sitting presidents were banned from social media, while the opposition enjoyed free rein to promote stories that were discredited once it was too late to matter. Conservatives put these things together and concluded that, whatever happened on November 3, 2020, it was not a free and fair democratic election in any sense that would have had meaning before Donald J. Trump was a candidate.

Trump supporters were led down some rabbit holes. But they are absolutely right that the institutions and power centers of this country have been monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to prevent them getting it. I encourage people on the Left to recognize the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity in front of them. You’re not going to agree with the conservatives on everything. But if in 2004 I had told you that the majority of the GOP voter base would soon be seeing the folly of the Iraq War, becoming skeptical of state surveillance, and beginning to see the need for action to help the poor and working classes, you’d have told me such a thing would transform the country. Take the opportunity. These people are not demons, and they are ready to listen in a way they haven’t in a long, long time.

Darryl Cooper is the host of The MartyrMade Podcast, Co-host of The Unraveling w/Jocko Willink, and author of “that” Twitter thread.

Read in English

Nakon dve godine sedenja na pismima Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, došlo je vreme za delovanje; s obzirom na to da je nemački ambasador u Srbiji u aprilu 2021. godine izneo neke primedbe, koje je primetio zapadni korporativni medijski front:

^ Fond braće Rokfeler dodeljuje kancelariji Balkanske mreže za istraživačko izveštavanje [BIRN] u Prištini, u proseku 100.000 USD godišnje, što je samo jedan od izvora sredstava koji BIRN prikuplja iz zapadnih korporativnih velikaša [1]

Dakle, šta je nemački ambasadorski glupan imao da kaže? Uprkos tome što nije bilo zakonskog ovlašćenja Ujedinjenih nacija za NATO bombardovanje Srbije, odluka o bombardovanju Srbije…

je morala biti doneta da bi se sprečila humanitarna katastrofa“ [2]

… ha. Ne pominje se nedavno spremanje kosovskih lidera na suđenja za ratne zločine? Oh, a šta je sa onim „ljudima“ iz BND (nemačka CIA) koji koriste Konrad Adenauer Siftung kao paravan za obuku i postavljanje neonacističkih fašista u Ukrajini? Da li ste se ikad zapitali šta bi mogli da rade u Beogradu? [3], [4]

Ne moramo putovati kroz vreme, u rane i srednje 1940-e, da bismo razumeli da „Deutschland über Alles“ u očima određenih susednih zemalja Nemačke treba gledati malo drugačije nego što bi većina današnjih običnih nemačkih smrtnika mogla pomisliti. Ali, nemački ambasador u Srbiji, Tomas Šib, nije običan nemački smrtnik, on predsedava lokacijom čiji je centar nemačkog BND (koji potiče od organizacije Gelen) u Beogradu.

U međuvremenu, pogledajmo pismo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda (prvobitni demanti) u vezi sa nekim vrlo gadnim postupcima nemačke države; to je „pranje“ ratnog zločina pod lažnom zastavom, koji je rezultirao smrću više od 1000 sirijskih civila (nastavite da čitate, predstavljeni su svi potrebni konteksti i dokazi).

Obratite pažnju na datume pisma; Međunarodni krivični sud (dalje u tekstu: ICC) je 4. jula 2018. primio žalbu, 6. februara 2019. je datum kada je ICC porekao da ima nadležnost za istragu. Ovo nije bio brz odgovor, sedam meseci ukazuje, ako ne na samoanalizu, onda barem na neko prilično vreme u razmišljanju o neophodnom okolišenju kako da se izbegne suočavanje sa izobiljem informacija iznetih pred sud. Osporio sam ovo poricanje komunikacijom (objavljenom onlajn) koja ukazuje na istoriju ICC, podložnoj neprikladnim uticajima i zahtevom da se oni preispitaju. [5]

Prvo pismo je generičko poricanje, drugo pismo je uvijeno, kako bi se objasnilo da sud smatra da su neki „ozbiljni navodi“ izvan njegovog dometa istrage:

Kada je sam Međunarodni krivični sud [ICC] saučesnik u prikrivanju ratnih zločina od strane nemačkih državnih aktera u 21. veku, svi na vrhu bi trebalo ponešto da objasne. Ukratko, ono što sledi je da postoji mnoštvo dokaza prima facie [latinski izraz: „na prvi pogled“] da je nemačka obaveštajna služba „pomagala i podržavala“ [asistirala] u prikrivanju pod lažnom zastavom hemijske napade u Siriji, uključujući i zloglasni (posebno ubilački) gasni napad sarinom na Gutu, Sirija, u avgustu 2013. godine. Ove informacije su dostavljene nemačkim parlamentarcima, kao i Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu. Nemci su ćutali, a Međunarodni krivični sud protestuje i izjavljuje da nije nadležan, prema drugom pismu:

„Tužilaštvo je pažljivo ispitalo vašu poslednju komunikaciju. Sa žaljenjem Vas obaveštavam da je tužilac potvrdio da komunikacija ne donosi nove činjenice ili dokaze koji bi promenili prethodnu odluku da ne postoji osnova za postupanje po Rimskom statutu. Prema Rimskom statutu, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo nad genocidom, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima, kako je definisano u Rimskom statutu (Članovi 6 do 8), ako su počinjeni 1. jula 2002. godine ili kasnije (Član 11). Pored toga, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo za takva krivična dela počinjena na teritoriji države koja je prihvatila nadležnost Suda ili od strane državljanina te države (Član 12), ili kada Savet bezbednosti upućuje situaciju na Sud (Član 13). U svetlu ovih zahteva, čini se da se Vaša komunikacija, nakon pažljivog preispitivanja, i dalje odnosi na pitanja van nadležnosti Suda.

„Nadam se da ćete uvažiti da su definisanom jurisdikcijom Suda mnogi ozbiljni navodi izvan dosega ove institucije. Zahvalni smo na vašem stalnom interesovanju za Međunarodni krivični sud.“

ICC očigledno nije u pravu. I kukavički je i korumpiran. Nemačka je potpisnica ICC-a, a krivično delo pomaganja i podržavanja (prikrivanje pod lažnom zastavom) nesumnjivo ima svoje polazište u nemačkoj državi. ICC, da bi izbegao ovo (uprkos priznanju „ozbiljnih navoda“), čini se da usko definiše nadležnost (ograničavajući primenljive optužbe) za zločin počinjen u Siriji (i na taj način izbegava optužbu za pomaganje i podržavanje) i zbog toga radije negira nadležnost nego da uzburka obaveštajnu službu Nemačke (Bundesnachrichtendienst ili BND) i mezimce Angele Merkel.

Pitanje koje se postavlja u filozofiji prava je, da li sam ICC postaje saučesnik u pomaganju i podržavanju [asistiranju] navodnom prikrivanju operacije pod lažnom zastavom, očigledno namernim „uskim“ čitanjem međunarodnog prava i očigledno kukavičkim izbegavanjem da istraže krupan ratni zločin? Čini mi se, da:

Ghouta_August_2013 - 1

Evo same žalbe, praćene mojom komunikacijom sa ICC-om koja je dovela do podnošenja prve žalbe:

Poštovano tužilaštvo pri Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu

Hvala vam na pozivu da formalizujem moju žalbu u vezi sa zločinom gasnog napada sarinom na Gutu, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.

I

Prema običajnom međunarodnom pravu, pomaganje i podržavanje ratnih zločina uključuje tri elementa:

(1) Glavno lice ili entitet počinio je ratni zločin;

(2) Drugi akter počinio je delo koje je imalo značajan efekat na izvršenje osnovnog dela; i

(3) Potrebno mentalno stanje: Drugi akter je znao da će takvo delo pomoći ili je postojala značajna verovatnoća da će pomoći izvršenju osnovnog dela.

https://www.justsecurity.org/32656/law-aiding-abetting-alleged-war-crimes-assess-uk-support-saudi-strikes-yemen/

II

1) Turska, država pripadnica NATO-a, preko svoje obaveštajne agencije MIT, urotila se sa al-Kaidom (predloženom tajnom članicom NATO-a) da počini ratni zločin, to jest (lažna zastava) gasni napad i usmrćivanje više od hiljadu civila u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.

2) Službenici NATO aktera Nemačke, potpisnice Rimskog statuta, pružili su „pokriće“ propagandom i drugim, srodnim sredstvima (npr. „pranje“ lažnih informacija medijima putem parlamentarnog nadzora) omogućavajući stvarnim počiniocima da pobegnu kontroli, iako su nemački obaveštajci znali:

3) Takva radnja (prethodno pomenuta) u velikoj meri bi pomogla izvršenju navedenog zločina ili drugim rečima, omogućila nekažnjivost lažnih zastava.

https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2018/04/15/what-can-be-known-vs-what-will-be-known/

III

Članovi 49/50/129/146 četiri Ženevske konvencije (1949) nalažu državama članicama da kazneno gone i kazne sva „lica“ koja čine teška kršenja (Ambos [2014] 146). Shodno tome, Elementi zločina Statuta ICC-a ne sadrže izričitu napomenu za kategoriju počinilaca, jer tokom pregovora na Rimskoj konferenciji nije bilo neslaganja da ratne zločine mogu počiniti i pripadnici oružanih snaga i civili (Dorman, Elementi ratnih zločina [2003] 391).

http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e431

IV

Prelazeći na neposredno prethodni (III), ovaj podnosilac predstavke Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu (Ronald Tomas Vest) drži da je osobama u bilo kojoj vladi, potpisnici Rimskog statuta, zabranjeno da pomažu i podržavaju ratni zločin ili zločin protiv čovečnosti bez obzira na zločin van nadležnosti sudova (država koja nije potpisnica) kada je pomaganje i podržavanje izvršeno u nadležnosti sudova (država potpisnica). To bi uključivalo zaposlene u obaveštajnim agencijama zapadnih demokratija i političare iz njihovih redova, koji pružaju pokriće počiniocima ratnih zločina i zločina protiv čovečnosti .

Imenovana lica nemačke savezne službe bezbednosti i odgovorni političari (Bundesnachrichtendienst) koji su proaktivno (pružali lažne informacije) ili pasivno (dozvoljavali lažne podatke) namerno pomagali i podržavali stvarne počinioce (turski MIT u partnerstvu sa al-Kaidom) (pod lažnom zastavom) gasni napad na Gutu, u Siriji u avgustu 2013. godine uključuje (ali nije ograničen na) bivšeg predsednika BND Gerharda Šindlera, sadašnjeg predsednika BND Bruna Kala, Helge Brauna (ministra nadzora) i Angelu Merkel.

Imenovane osobe koje rukovode nemačkom kancelarijom saveznog tužioca, (Generalbundesanwalt/Generalbundesanwältin) a koje nisu izvršile istraživanje i procesuiranje na domaćem i međunarodnom planu (univerzalna nadležnost za ratne zločine ili Völkerstrafgesetzbuch) su Harald Range i Peter Frank.

Imenovani nemački parlamentarci (rukovodstvo i/ili stariji članovi) koji poseduju (barem od decembra 2015. godine) oslobađajuće dokaze koji oslobađaju predsednika Bašara al Asada i njegove zvaničnike i vojsku zbog napada sarinom u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine i nisu preduzeli odgovarajuće mere da nemačku obaveštajnu službu i/ili nemačke političke aktere pokore utvrđenim činjenicama prema međunarodnom pravu i, shodno tome, zaštitili su NATO aktera i njihove partnere u al-Kaidi od svetlosti, kao što su stvarni počinioci (ali ne ograničeno na) Hans-Kristijan Stroebele, Ula Jelpke, Irene Mihalic, Mihael Hartman, Armin Šuster, Norbert Lamert, Peter Hince, Johanes Singhamer, Edelgard Bulman, Ursula Šmit, Petra Pau, Klaudija Rot, Marieluise Bek, Omid Nuripur, Stefan Libih, Nils Anen, Roderih Kizeveter i Gregor Gisi.

https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2015/12/07/send-a-letter/

V

Da bi kontekstualizovali dugu naviku zapadnih obaveštajnih agencija koje sponzorišu i/ili pomažu i podržavaju terorizam lažne zastave, preporučuje se tužilac ICC-a da pregleda istoriju GLADIO-a:

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Operation_Gladio

i prelazimo u sadašnje vreme sa GLADIO B:

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Operation_Gladio/B

Radi šireg razumevanja osnovne ili utemeljujuće kriminalne prirode / porekla nemačkog Bundesnachrichtendienst-a, preporučuje se da tužilac ICC-a pregleda poreklo i istoriju BND-a iz organizacije Gelen:

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/

Da bi se razumelo da nemački zvaničnici koji su trenutno na vlasti i dalje igraju podmuklo u sadašnjoj geopolitičkoj eri, daju se sledeće informacije:

https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/03/25/germanys-martyrs-of-the-maidan/

Kontekstualizujući odnos obaveštajnih agencija država NATO-a (uključujući Nemačku, potpisnicu Rimskog statuta) prema hemijskim zločinima al-Kaide u Siriji, preporučuje se tužiocu ICC-a da ispita novinarstvo Vanese Belei u vezi s takozvanim Belim šlemovima:

Podržavajući izjavu turskog poslanika Erena Erdema da su „pobunjeničke“ (al-Kaida) hemikalije dopremljene iz Evrope, je ruska vojna obaveštajna služba:

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201806221065657552-chemical-weapons-russia-syria-europe/

Zaključak

Zapadne obaveštajne agencije imaju dugu istoriju nepoštene igre (kriminalne aktivnosti). U slučaju da je nemačka BND pomagala i podržavala Al-Kaidu u Siriji, postoje snažni dokazi prima facie o namernom „pranju“ lažnih informacija putem obaveštajnih podataka Saveznog nemačkog parlamenta (Bundestag) nadzorni odbor za medije koji izvršavaju prikrivanje (prikrivanje stvarnih počinilaca) ratnog zločina koji uključuje gas sarin, prema originalnim informacijama dostavljenim ICC-u sa izmenama i dopunama:

Eren_Erdem - 1

Šta se može znati naspram onoga što će se znati

Verovatno je samo pitanje vremena kada će CIA urednici na Vikipediji promeniti nedavno ažurirane informacije u gorenavedenom (kropovanom uvećanom screenshot-u) Vikipedijinom članku poslednji put ažuriranom 4. aprila 2018:

„Erdem takođe tvrdi da je sarin-gas transportovan kroz Tursku u Siriju, kasnije korišćen u hemijskom napadu na Gutu 2013. godine,kao i kasniji napadi ISIL-a na civile. Erdem je pred parlamentom pokazao slučaj gde su vođene istrage koje su dovele do hapšenja 13 potencijalnih turskih pripadnika ISIL-a, ali se kasnije neobjašnjivo od njih odustalo.

„Erdem se u Turskoj suočava sa optužbama za izdaju zbog svojih objava.

Šta je zvanično izjavio turski član parlamenta Eren Erdem? Govoreći o kopiji (koju ima u svom posedu) krivičnog predmeta tužioca Adane 2013/120, koji su poništili Erdoganovi ljudi:

„U ovoj optužnici postoje podaci. Materijali za hemijsko oružje dovoze se u Tursku i sastavljaju u Siriji u logorima ISIS-a koji je u to vreme bio poznat kao iračka Al Kaida.

Sve ovo je otkriveno. Postoje snimci telefonskih razgovora o ovom transportovanju, poput „ne brinite o granici, mi ćemo se pobrinuti za to“, a takođe vidimo i da se koristi birokratija.

U vezi sa pošiljkom, republički tužilac u Adani, Mehmet Arıkan, izveo je operaciju i ljudi koji su umešani su zadržani. Ali, koliko razumem, on nije bio uticajna osoba u birokratiji. Nedelju dana nakon toga, imenovan je još jedan javni tužilac, preuzeo je optužnicu i svi pritvorenici su pušteni. I napustili su Tursku prelazeći sirijsku granicu.

Snimci telefonskih razgovora u optužnici pokazali su sve detalje, od načina na koji će pošiljka prevesti do toga kako će biti pripremljena, od sadržaja laboratorija do izvora materijala. Koji kamioni će se koristiti, svi datumi itd. Od A do Ž, o svemu se razgovaralo i snimalo. Uprkos svim ovim dokazima, osumnjičeni su pušteni.

I pošiljka se dogodila, jer ih niko nije zaustavio. Zbog toga je možda rezultat toga sarin koji je korišćen u Siriji.

Kada sam pročitao optužnicu, jasno sam video da ti ljudi imaju veze sa Turskim Institutom za mašinsku i hemijsku industriju i da nimalo ne brinu oko prelaska granice.

Na primer, u telefonskim zapisima Hajama Kasapa, mnogo puta ga čujete kako govori sarin gas, govoreći da su ateljei spremni za proizvodnju, materijal čeka u kamionima koji navodno voze gaziranu sodu.

Na primer, hemijski napad u Guti. Zapamtite. Tvrdilo se da iza toga stoje režimske snage. Ovaj napad izveden je samo nekoliko dana pre operacije sarinom u Turskoj.

Velika je verovatnoća da je ovaj napad izveden sa onim osnovnim materijalom koji je isporučen kroz Tursku. Kaže se da su režimske snage odgovorne, ali optužnica kaže da je to ISIS. Inspektori UN-a su otišli na lokaciju, ali nisu uspeli da pronađu nikakve dokaze. Ali u ovoj optužnici smo pronašli dokaze. Znamo ko je koristio gas sarin, a zna to i naša vlada.

Svi osnovni materijali kupuju se iz Evrope. Zapadne institucije treba da se preispitaju o tim odnosima. Zapadni izvori vrlo dobro znaju ko je izvršio gasni napad sarinom u Siriji. Oni znaju ove ljude, znaju sa kim ti ljudi rade, znaju da ti ljudi rade za Al-Kaidu. Mislim da su zapadnjaci licemerni po pitanju ove situacije.“

Šta se još može znati?

1) Rukovodstvo nemačkog parlamenta (sve političke stranke), kao i nemački savezni tužilac su obavešteni 2. decembra 2015. godine, od strane iskreno Vašeg:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (1)

Poštovani poslanici nemačkog parlamenta

Želim da skrenem pažnju na nedavne informacije u vezi sa vašim saveznikom u NATO-u,Turskom. Prošlog meseca su dva hrabra člana turskog parlamenta otkrila da u stvari iza turskih saveznih obaveštajnih službi stoje gasni napad sarinom u avgustu 2013. godine, ubivši više od hiljadu običnih Sirijaca, napad za koji su NATO države okrivile režim Bašera al-Assad. Vaš vlastiti Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) trebalo je da bude svestan ove činjenice od skoro samog početka, jer su proaktivno angažovani u Siriji i sirijskom sukobu, kao i špijunirajući Tursku.

Štaviše, državni akter Turska, koja je pokrenula napad sarinom nije neka nedokumentovana optužba. Kao što vidite iz priloženog izveštaja, turske vlasti su sprovele odgovarajuću istragu sa razvijenim dokazima i optužnicama. Žao mi je što vas obaveštavam da je, u ovom slučaju, predsednik Erdogan lično pokrenuo tužilaštvo koje se prošle nedelje pobrinulo da urednik novinskih izveštaja završi u zatvoru.

Ovo postavlja snažna pitanja o mogućem krivičnom saučesništvu BND-a, s obzirom na podršku Nemačke određenim NATO državama direktno u vezi sa sirijskim sukobom. Šta je BND znao i kada? Da li je BND, prenoseći Asadovoj opoziciji, preko svojih NATO saveznika, obaveštajne podatke o Siriji, podržao aktere koji su izvršili gasni napad na Sirijce? Da li je odnos Nemačke koja podržava vladu Erdogana zakonit, u svetlu ovih dokaza? Da li je BND doprineo geopolitičkim dezinformacijama koje Asada krive za napad sarinom iz avgusta 2013. godine? Da li je vaš parlament prevaren u ovom pitanju, posebno vaš odbor za nadzor obaveštajnih službi?

Jasno je da bi slučaj Sarin, uzevši u obzir Nemačku, kao upućenog aktera ili saučesnika u Siriji, trebalo voditi protiv Turske putem pravnog mehanizma Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, kao i domaće tužbe tih nemačkih zvaničnika, posebno napominjući BND, koji je omanuo u izveštavanju i/ili se urotio u zaveru radi prikrivanja ratnog zločina ili zločina protiv čovečnosti.

To bi trebalo da budu pitanja i zahtevi koje ćete predstaviti saveznom tužiocu.

Ron Vest

2) Nemačka obaveštajna služba (BND) lagala je odboru za nadzor rada obaveštajne službe nemačkog parlamenta:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (2)

(Preveden, obeležen tekst) „Berlin – Federalna obaveštajna služba (BND) podržava ocenu Amerikanaca da režim sirijskog predsednika Bašara al-Asada stoji iza napada otrovnim gasom u predgrađu Damaska 21. avgusta. U tajnim poverljivim izjavama za bezbednosne političare, predsednik BND Gerhard Šindler rekao je da nedostaje jasan dokaz. Nakon dubinske analize verodostojnosti, međutim, njegovo ministarstvo pretpostavlja da je krivac režim.“

Na engleskom, u Der Spiegel:

Strana obaveštajna agencija zemlje, Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), slaže se sa stavom SAD-a koji smatra da je sirijski predsednik Bašar Asad odgovoran za napade otrovnim gasovima u blizini Damaska 21. avgusta. Na tajnom brifingu za odabir poslanika u ponedeljak, šef BND-a Gerhard Šindler rekao je da, iako još uvek nema neospornih dokaza, analiza dostupnih dokaza navela je njegovu obaveštajnu službu da veruje da je kriv Asadov režim.

Na brifingu je Šindler rekao da samo Asadov režim poseduje binarno hemijsko oružje poput sarina. BND veruje da bi režimski stručnjaci bili jedini sposobni za proizvodnju takvog oružja i njegovo raspoređivanje malim raketama. BND veruje da je takvo oružje korišćeno nekoliko puta pre napada 21. avgusta, za koje se veruje da je usmrtilo više od 1.400 ljudi

3) Možemo znati da je BND bolje znao zbog obaveštajnih oficira koji su bili previše glupi da bi držali jezik za zubima. U stvari BND nije nadležan samo u Siriji, BND je posvećen svrgavanju Asada:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (3)

U izveštaju se navode reči američkog obaveštajnog agenta koji kaže: „Nijedna zapadna obaveštajna služba nema tako dobre izvore u Siriji kao što ima BND.“

Član BND-a rekao je za novine da je obaveštajna služba „ponosna na važan doprinos koji je srušila Asadov režim“. Nije navedeno ime zvaničnika u izveštaju.

Ono što će se znati je, ovo su sve informacije koje su stavljene pred nemačke parlamentarce i koje su bile u njihovom posedu u poslednje dve godine, čak i dok je Angela Merkel papagajski izveštavala obaveštajne agencije „Asad je to učinio“, bez obzira što Asad to nije učinio, nikada to nije učinio.

Ono što je ružno je da nemački političari prihvataju da ih laže njihova obaveštajna agencija, a pritom drže jezik za zubima i sede na rukama dok poseduju dokaze o stvarnim počiniocima ratnog zločina.

I, ne zaboravimo da hemikalije, sirovine za izradu gasa sarina, dolaze ili su poreklom IZ EVROPE, pre tranzita preko Turske uz pomoć obaveštajne agencije NATO-a (uz saučesništvo obaveštajnih agencija, množina, BND je to zataškao) i predate su u ruke al Kaida i Islamske države.

Na šta bi trebalo da se podseti ovo prikrivanje činjenica zločina otrovnim gasom? Poreklo političke stranke Angele Merkel sa Adenauerom, koji je dočekivao naciste u redove demohrišćana? BND koji je osnovala CIA rehabilitovanjem glavnog ratnog zločinca Rajnharda Gelena? Da li je tačno da Nemačka nikada nije izgubila određenu nacističku crtu?

onlajn izveštaji/referenca:

https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2018/07/03/western-intelligence-agencies-the-international-criminal-court/

  1. jul 2018., u 14:19, OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> je napsao:

Poštovani,

Hvala vam za vašu poruku. Imajte na umu da Međunarodni krivični sud ima vrlo ograničenu nadležnost. Sud se može baviti samo zločinima genocida, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima kako su definisani članovima 6 do 8 Rimskog statuta koji su se dogodili posle 2002, i može vršiti jurisdikciju samo u zemljama koje su ga ratifikovale. Za više informacija o nadležnosti Suda i pun tekst Rimskog statuta, pogledajte stranicu 2 priloženog dokumenta i našu veb stranicu, kao i našu adresu, http://www.icc-cpi.int. Savetujemo vam da pažljivo pregledate ove informacije.

Ako i nakon pažljivog pregleda i dalje smatrate da je ICC pravo mesto za vaš slučaj i želite da podnesete zahtev Sudu, sledite uputstva kako to učiniti na stranici 1 priloženog dokumenta. Ako odlučite da pošaljete informacije, koristite samo ovu adresu e-pošte: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.

Srdačan pozdrav,

OTP informativni desk

Međunarodni krivični sud

Korekcija 5. jula 2018., u odeljku IV, ime Gerhard Šreder, ispravljeno je u Gerhard Šindler (bivši predsednik BND-a). ICC je obavešten o ovoj ispravci.

Ažuriranje od 9. jula 2018.: Sledeća komunikacija primljena od ICC-a:

Hag, 9. jula 2018.

Poštovani,

Tužilaštvo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda potvrđuje prijem vaših dokumenata / pisma.

Ova komunikacija je uredno uneta u Registar komunikacija Zavoda. Razmotrićemo ovu komunikaciju, prema potrebi, u skladu sa odredbama Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda.

Imajte na umu da ovo potvrdno pismo ne znači da je istraga otvorena, niti da će istragu otvoriti Tužilaštvo.

Čim se donese odluka, obavestićemo vas, u pisanoj formi, i dostaviti vam razloge za ovu odluku.

Iskreno Vaš,

Mark P. Dilon, šef jedinice za informacije i dokaze

Tužilaštvo

[1] https://www.rbf.org/grantees/balkan-investigative-reporting-network

[2] https://balkaninsight.com/2021/04/12/how-serbia-can-learn-from-germanys-post-war-remorse/

[3] https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2014/03/25/germanys-martyrs-of-the-maidan/

[4] https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2020/05/05/education-espionage/

[5] https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2019/02/22/the-international-criminal-complicity/

Povezano: Obrazovanje i špijunaža

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Part one HERE                                                      Čitajte na srpskom

In part one the reader was introduced to psyops (psychological operations) in its ‘civilian’ form (pioneered by Edward Bernays based on his uncle Sigmund Freud’s principles) euphemistically renamed ‘public relations’ or, the corporate form of applying propaganda to the consumer; little different to intelligence agencies targeting populations of hostile states with disinformation. Each approach, whether ‘civilian’ or military, seeks to manipulate a populace away from their self interest (even survival) to the benefit of the propaganda’s perpetrators. Having seen (in part one) the greed of western corporate oligarchs operates within a system essentially ‘legalizing’ what could amount to state sponsored murder with impunity, or shortly restated; allows for a ‘state of emergency’ to authorize use of unstudied, experimental drug that is very expensive,  Bamlanivimab, on an unsuspecting populace in lieu of a known to be safe, proving to be effective and inexpensive drug, ivermectin, to treat covid, with the latter suppressed in corporate media. Now, we will look at the present ‘public relations’ (psyops) that point to disinformation relevant to vaccines (or so-called vaccines.)

Semantics & Splitting Hairs

What is a vaccine? Traditionally, a vaccine refers to employ of ‘inactivated’ (dead) virus to stimulate an immune response. The Chinese covid vaccine is based on this methodology, as were many years (decades) of flu shots. This method allows the immune system to do its job naturally.

What is gene therapy? For the past two decades, gene therapy refers tinkering with the genetic material itself, including mRNA. But Moderna denies its anti-covid therapy employing mRNA is gene therapy:

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Moderna website: “Gene therapy and gene editing alter the original genetic information each cell carries. The goal is to produce a permanent fix to the underlying genetic problem by changing the defective gene. Moderna is taking a different approach to address the underlying cause of MMA and other diseases. mRNA transfers the instructions stored in DNA to make the proteins required in every living cell. Our approach aims to help the body make its own missing or defective protein. Unlike gene editing and gene therapy, mRNA technology does not change the genetic information of the cell” [1]

Well, Moderna lied. Not about the technique but the fact that mRNA research has fallen under the rubric of “gene therapy” for decades, as demonstrated at the National Institute of Health library in a plethora of research papers:

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the National Institute of Health website: “Synthetic messenger RNA [mRNA] as a tool for gene therapy” [2]

What the Moderna psyops people want you to think (when disingenuously narrowing the definition of gene therapy) is, because they are not modifying the DNA, where the actual genes are located, it is not gene therapy. But guess what? RNA is also genetic material with significance when it is subjected to corporate scientific (greed driven) monkey business.

The imperfect (but adequate) analogy would be DNA comprises the headquarters issuing instructions intended to build certain structures. mRNA is the courier delivering the DNA blueprint to the construction site. What mRNA “gene therapy” accomplishes is, it swaps the blueprint little different to if you’d sent instructions via a courier service but the instructions you’d sent are not what arrived at the intended destination because someone in the courier service had substituted the original with an altered set of instructions. In the case of the Moderna covid gene therapy (it is NOT a vaccine in any sense of what ‘vaccine’ meant prior to covid) the problem is (again, as in the case of Bamlanivimab in part one) this therapy has been ‘fast tracked’ and employed under emergency powers that forego the normal required studies that law would require prior to approval. In short, the long term health implications for the people receiving this therapy is unknown or restated, psychopath (greed driven) corporate lobbyists ($) have bought, convinced or otherwise subverted institutions to a point the common citizens are little different to lab rats.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Popular Mechanics website: “After a remarkably accelerated development period, two experimental COVID-19 (coronavirus) vaccines are almost ready for primetime. Both use a technology called messenger RNA (mRNA), which has been studied and experimented with for decades in different forms, but has never been used in a commercial vaccine” [3]

Note the terminology “accelerated development”, “experimental” and “never been used.” In short other words, inadequately studied and only authorized for the fact of a ‘state of emergency.’

Screenshot of the “Emergency Use Authorizations” for Moderna & Pfizer mRNA injections at the USA’s Food & Drug Administration website [4]

Following on part one (the suppression of an effective, cheap anti-covid drug, ivermectin, while promoting an unstudied, experimental drug, Bamlanivimab), in this follow on part two, it becomes clear promoting human health and rapid recovery is not the primary objective of the institutions charged with containing the so-called “pandemic.” In fact, it would appear transcendent corruption is treading a path towards a state of biological terror waged by the Western governments on its own citizens in absence of any practice of ethical self restraint that should have 1) employed ivermectin as a safe, cheap and effective covid cure and 2) developed a classic vaccine, with proven safe method based on ‘inactivated’ (dead) virus as the Chinese had done. Meanwhile, let’s hope the Chinese act responsibly in further research efforts when considering mRNA gene therapy. [5], [6], [7], [8]

Follow the Money

In whose interest is using the national body of citizens as lab rats?

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the American Broadcasting Corporation website: “Gates, who had invested in the vaccine technology in 2015, emphasized the importance of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines ending this pandemic and potentially ones to come in the future” [9]

Bill Gates is hardly a molecular scientist. What Bill Gates actually is, is a narcissist. Does Bill Gates understand that mRNA is experimental, understudied technique, that quite possibly could prove to be anything but beneficial to human health over long term? A narcissist won’t entertain the question. But the matter of fact is, Bill Gates is playing God with his wealth buying influence determining covid policy on a global scale in circumstance of demanding employ of experimental, understudied and/or untested remedies that can only be approved with emergency authorizations because they are NOT proven safe.

World Health Organization illustration (screenshot) showing the Gates Foundation is the WHO’s 2nd largest provider of funds (after the USA) in 2018-2019, the Gates’ contribution exceeding USD $500,000,000 for the period. [10], [11]

Lies by Omission

Meanwhile, in Serbia, media remaining silent on the effectiveness of ivermectin while the use of the experimental Bamlanivimab is allowed without warning of its unstudied/untested status (this author had emailed this information to several English language Serbian news outlets with no acknowledgement or reply), and where there is no exam of the experimental nature of the mRNA anti-covid injection, also allowed in Serbia, there appears to be an element of rank hypocrisy when the authority is threatening imprisonment for ‘fake news’ concerning vaccinations when the state itself is withholding information the citizens should require to make informed decisions; because it is truly disseminating fake news to allow citizens the impression mRNA ‘vaccines’ (gene therapies) are safe.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from Telegraf website: “Both [Minister of Justice Maja Popovic and Minister of Health Zlatibor Loncar]
referred to the Criminal Code, which in Article 343 stipulates that anyone who, by presenting or transmitting false news or allegations, causes panic or serious disturbance of public order or peace or thwarts or significantly impedes implementation of decisions and measures of state bodies or organizations exercising public authority, shall be punished by imprisonment of between three months and three years, and with a fine” [12]

In light of the preceding, we should close with a dry observation; criminal negligence is demonstrated throughout the institutions charged with containing corona virus (on a global scale.) Whether due to corporate psyops (propaganda) manipulating narcissism in a state of greed driven political expediency or preying upon incompetence, transcendent corruption is the (above the law) corporate-coopted-corrupted state’s exercise of impunity. Who’s to panic? Leadership in a state of exposure?

“Truth is suppressed, not to protect the country from enemy agents but to protect the Government against the people” -Roy Hattersley

 

[1] https://www.modernatx.com/about-mrna

[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17007566/

[3] https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a34787908/what-is-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-pfizer-moderna/

[4] https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization#covid19euas

[5] https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2021/04/01/transcendent-corruption-corona-virus-part-one/

[6] https://theconversation.com/how-are-covid-19-vaccines-made-an-expert-explains-155430

[7] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-12/china-vaccine-going-global-with-four-different-efficacy-rates

[8] https://sputniknews.com/asia/202104121082602410-chinese-cdc-director-refutes-reportedly-claiming-chinese-vaccines-have-low-protection-rate/

[9] https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-announces-250-million-covid/story?id=74651890

[10] https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2020-05-29/gates-foundation-donations-to-who-nearly-match-those-from-us-government

[11] http://open.who.int/2018-19/contributors/contributor

[12] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3320196-those-spreading-fake-news-about-vaccines-and-vaccination-face-up-to-5-years-in-prison

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

Since the days of Edward Bernays adapting his uncle Sigmund Freud’s psychological principles to propaganda (euphemistically renamed ‘public relations’) for purpose of corporate advertising, the world’s populace has been exposed to what the intelligence agencies refer to as ‘psyops’ or “psychological operations.” In certain circumstance these operations are carefully designed to be supported by politicians in the intelligence agency sense of ‘backstopped’ or restated: Lying to the public requires unethical ‘convincing’ (lying to) a nation’s leadership to accomplish certain (greed driven) marketing objectives. Furthermore, this ‘culture’ can easily reflect what rogue CIA officer Phillip Agee had noted becomes a social-environmental phenomenon:

“You get so used to lying that, after awhile, it’s hard to remember what the truth is.” 

In short other words, capitalism’s lobbyist (public relations) infection creates a social-cultural environment where ‘truth’ becomes a ‘relative’ or incidental, accidental, or oftentimes, a deliberately concealed (depending on the level of awareness within the hierarchy) thing with little bearing on what has become a plasticized, or artificial, reality for the targets of larger psyops (populations.) [1]

The ‘psyops’ or psychology integrated to lobbyists’ presentations prepared for politicians are actually a necessary ‘pre-psyop’ to accomplish the larger psyops goal of manipulating a populace to ‘buy’ and it goes something like this hypothetical analysis of what is recently happening in Serbia:

“Patients … have started receiving a new drug against Covid-19, Bamlanivimab, which prevents further spread of the infection, that is, the progression of the disease from mild to severe…” [2]

Nowhere in this news presented at the Serbian media site is there any mention that

1) Bamlanivimab is an experimental drug that had been initially authorized for use against covid in the USA in December 2020 only because of a state of emergency; the drug has not been put through the necessary studies and medical trial procedures the law would normally require to protect the consumers.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from drugs.com: “It is not yet known if Bamlanivimab is a safe and effective treatment for any condition” [3]

2) Ivermectin, a cheap, generic drug, with a safety track record of 50 years use, had been shown in laboratory testing (April 2020 or a full year ago) to kill 99.8% of the covid 19 virus in 24 hours, but this medical fact is practically unknown to the Serbian medical community. Why?

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from drugs.com: “The trials so far have shown ivermectin reduces the number of cell-associated viral RNA by 99.8 % in 24 hours” [4]

3) Following the (dated April 2020 in the above screenshot) ivermectin lab test result on covid, this drug was used in Peru and there was a DRAMATIC DROP in covid deaths, that is until there was a change in political administration and the use of ivermectin had been restricted, which saw a DRAMATIC HIKE in covid deaths [5]

4) Demand from top health professionals across the world pushing data at the World Health Organization to attempt authorizing the use of ivermectin merely elicits a promise of a ‘probe’, no matter the existing positive result indicated in multiple trails comes from some of the top specialists in the world (as government institutions like the USA’s Federal Food & Drug Administration drag their feet and demand large, time consuming studies)

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from an MSN article on World Health Organization & ivermectin: American pulmonary and critical care specialist Pierre Kory, president of the Front-Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – a group of critical care specialists and published academic authors developing treatment protocols to prevent the transmission of Covid-19: “It is certainly another tool in the toolkit and we need everything we can to go after this pandemic. It’s not that I think that Ivermectin can help people. I know it helps people. The data is unmistakable and consistent. It shows quicker time to viral clearance, lower viral loads, faster times to recovery and lowered mortality rates” [6]

5) So, we have gone from “It is not yet known if Bamlanivimab is a safe and effective treatment for any condition” to the suppression of a known to be safe (fifty years) drug that is shown to beat covid. Why? A cheap generic drug (ivermectin) that is effective doesn’t make Eli Lilly (big pharma) money. The price of a experimental drug Bamlanivimab dose for covid? USD $1,250.

The price for an effective against covid dose of ivermectin? Over 95% less than Bamlanivimab

Yet Bamlanivimab is the national governments (not only in USA but following the USA’s lead) covid treatment of choice, even as the USA’s National Institute of Health allows (if not endorses) ivermectin as a covid treatment due to overwhelming pressure from medical professionals [7]

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Blitz news site: “Safe, inexpensive, widely available, with a decades-long track record, and even a Nobel Prize attached to it, the drug recently cleared National Institute of Health (NIH) hurdles to be an allowed treatment for Covid-19. Frontline doctors using the drug to great success argue it needs to be adopted widely and rapidly”

“Transcendent Corruption” is legal but unethical and immoral gains that exacts a social price up to, and is inclusive of, unnecessary suffering and death. It is in a sense legalized murder with impunity. It works like this: ‘science’ is presented to politicians by psyops (public relations) trained parties in a culture of political lies where lobbyists simply point to the USA ‘approving’ (not mentioning under emergency powers, forgoing safety studies) the unproven, experimental drug Bamlanivimab and altogether remain silent on ivermectin. Because the politicians are dependent on the lobbyists money and associated power, whether in ‘legal’ form of donation (transcendent corruption’s method of bribe) or other forms of enrichment such as investment, they simply accept the lobbyists’ word and Eli Lilly (big pharma’s player in this case) makes immense amounts of money with a dice throw on the common citizens backs; where the citizens not only pay the outrageous sum for the unproven medicine with taxes, the citizens will, in the absence of safety studies, perhaps pay in future with their literal lives. In the case someone brings up ivermectin as a plausible alternative, the lobbyists will point to the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (or other governments & agencies) recommending against its use, as well the World Health Organization having not yet approved ivermectin’s use, and fail to mention the USA’s National Institute of Health allows the use of ivermectin and the many positive reviews for this safe, cheap drug in treating covid by medical professionals across the world.

Relevant to the preceding, in Serbia, Transcendent Corruption in media takes a twofold track; neither of which is good for the common people. 1) the ‘regime’ is attacked as corrupt by those Western style media outlets characterized as ‘opposition’ but in fact are funded by a ‘who’s who’ of color revolution instigators such as Soros, and the many usual suspects fronting for Western intelligence agencies, such as the several organizations functioning under the ‘umbrella’ (‘whorehouse’ would be the better noun) of USAID. Predictably, there should be little interest in raising awareness concerning ivermectin in these ‘opposition’ media venues pushing agendas for Western corporate capitalism and its oligarch minions, in this case, those associated with big pharma. 2) There will be little motivation for the ‘regime’ to correct its mistakes in a sea of political lies and raise awareness concerning ivermectin; where in circumstance of  Transcendent Corruption, with a psyops (public relations) assist, the principal leaders assume a posture of (self) denial of the actual facts; the regime’s politicians will have actually convinced themselves they are doing what is good for the people (authorize Bamlanivimab) and state controlled media will not bite the hand that feeds them. This is cumulative result of psyops preying upon a frailty of human psychology per the observation of Thucydides 2,500 years past:

“It is the habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they would prefer not to examine”

 

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part two

 

Related: Covid 19 (scientific counter-narratives)

 

[1] https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Edward_Bernays

[2] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3318680-clinical-center-of-vojvodina-patients-start-received-new-drug-against-covid

[3] https://www.drugs.com/mtm/bamlanivimab.html

[4] https://archive.li/Rh7m1

[5] https://trialsitenews.com/ivermectin-for-covid-19-in-peru-14-fold-reduction-in-nationwide-excess-deaths-p-002-for-effect-by-state-then-13-fold-increase-after-ivermectin-use-restricted/

[6] https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/who-to-probe-use-of-ivermectin-for-covid-19-treatment-after-promising-results-in-trials/ar-BB1cZDIp

[7] https://www.weeklyblitz.net/health/ivermectin-shows-great-success-in-treating-covid-19/

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

“…It is also clear that the overall death rate in 2020 was exceeded by the five years of 1999-2003. I need to define the death rate here, as it is based on the deaths per thousand people, which eliminates the fact that populations were lower in earlier years. It’s a given that larger population might have a higher death total from a given disease, but not a higher death rate. Diseases work on the susceptible individuals of a population and, thus, it is a proportion of the population that becomes ill or dies.

“That said, how does the death rate in the UK for 2020 compare to previous years? It is clear that the death rate in the UK for 2020 was not exceptional compared to previous years. How can that be? If you have Covid-19 as well as influenza killing people, what is going on? An observation has been made that, for some mysterious reason, influenza, as of April in the US, dropped to zero and continues at zero in the latest flu season.

“In light of the apparent missing influenza, claims have been made that masking, distancing, and lockdowns were completely effective against influenza, but then there is no talk about its failure in stopping Covid-19, which is a virus of the same size and transmission mode.

“Then, we are told that Covid is still around because people are not masking and such properly, which means influenza should also still be around in the US. Since these are infectious viruses, how can these restrictions be effective against one virus and not the other? It does not make sense.

“It is also easy to find that US states with strict mandates have the same rates of PCR-positive cases as those who do not. The conjecture can be made that influenza cases are largely reported as Covid-19, based either on a positive PCR test result or on symptoms alone.

“In the US, it is clear that there has been a monetary incentive for diagnosing the disease and encouraging hospitalizations. The cessation of other medical procedures and tests during this period clearly is going to lead to increased overall deaths. The fact that there appears to be no excess deaths despite this, indicates that the C-19 virus itself was not as lethal as they claim.

“Overall, the death rate in the UK is not out of line with the normal death rates from other years and clearly not close to the highest in the last 22 years. It is difficult to consider influenza deaths when there appears to be a bias toward categorizing influenza and other causes as Covid-19 deaths.

“Every year and, for that matter, all year long, there is a population of health-critical individuals who may be overwhelmed by a flu-like illness and open to pneumonia complications. The questionable Covid-19 PCR test appears to be keeping the presence of Covid-19 alive, possibly detecting viruses of the current flu season.

“The WHO is now admitting that that this test can be 97% false positives or more, with higher processing cycle numbers. The argument could be made that we have an epidemic of [false positive] testing…”

Or so says PhD biologist Banson Wilcot at ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International. [1]

So, I looked up several references not related to the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site itself on the subject of how the ‘flu vanished’ and Wilcot seems to spot on.

Why? I was trying to make sense of Covid numbers in Serbia (that don’t make sense) and Wilcot’s was the first article I’d come across that addressed the issue in a sensible way. Specifically, I wanted to know how a vicious pathogen (Covid) could justify pandemic “measures” when the national mortality rate for the year 2020 hadn’t spiked (at all) in comparison to previous years:

Graph: Serbia’s death rate has been flat at 13.2 deaths average per 1,000 for the past four years; 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2020. [2]

The ‘fringe conspiracy’ site then caused me to look at other statistics to establish (or disestablish) its veracity while casting a wider net to see what is going on elsewhere in comparison to Serbia and violà! The so-called ‘progressive’ site VOX News supports two points made by ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot:

1) Flu has virtually vanished in the USA (VOX graph credit to Center for Disease Control and Prevention) for the 2020-2021 statistical season &  2) the VOX article upholds the oxymoron pointed out by Wilcot; crediting masks for the ‘historic’ low level of flu in the same environment where masks have NOT halted the spread of Covid, a disease spread by identical method. Clearly, someone is not being honest concerning the ‘vanished flu’ phenomenon and it would appear that dishonest someone is VOX and is NOT ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot. [3]

Now, for some initial perspective on what certainly appear to be grossly inflated figures ascribed to Covid in the USA with highly unreliable PCR tests as well as forgoing tests for other pathogens (includes the vanished flu and likely many tens of thousands of deaths by other pathogens and related underlying cause such as frail health or any other reason wrongly attributed to Covid.) [4]

If we take the roughly 500,000 deaths ‘attributed’ to Covid in the USA and apply that as a percentage to the USA population of about 330 million for the 2020-2021 season, Americans arrived at sacrificing their civil liberties for a 0.15% gross population Covid death rate that relies on severely inflated (official) Covid numbers incorporating the missing flu and untold other causes of death such as stress related deaths due to underlying health issues aggravated by lock-downs, Covid related policies pushing people into poverty & higher mortality, America’s staggering problem with obesity (Covid kills obese people in high numbers), attrition in America’s exploding homeless population et cetera. These numbers won’t be properly sorted before years of study but in the meanwhile a highly politicized (Dr ‘Faustus’ driven) Covid panic-power grab dishonestly lumps everything together. Bolstering Wilcot’s account:

I still can’t find 500,000 excess deaths caused by Covid in 2020; they’re simply not there among the diseases the CDC reported out and since the base risk is 1/50,000 even across half the population being infected we could only account for 3,000 deaths. It is thus clear that if in fact Covid-19 has killed anywhere near the number of people claimed those other morbid conditions, all of which are serious diseases standing alone, have to account for the increase between them. Indeed the most-common, by far (40% of additional deaths by disease) were due to heart attacks and the next was diabetes at 13%. Between diabetes and heart attacks, both almost-exclusively due to lifestyle choices and thus your personal decisions, 53% of the excess 120,475 deaths are accounted for. If we add in strokes, which also are largely lifestyle-related then we’re at about 2/3rds.

Among those diseases that are allegedly “the biggest comorbid factors” I can find only 120,475 more deaths that Covid-19 may have contributed to and which included those diseases as a causal factor in total. Did Covid-19 cause all of those 120,000 additional deaths or were they caused by, in the case of diabetes, strokes and heart attacks for example, the additional 50lbs that a material percentage of people put on during the lockdowns (and over 20lbs on average!) from eating takeout trash full of fast carbs and being involuntarily cooped up in their homes? We do not know so this can only describe an upper boundary or caused mortality — not a lower one. This analysis doesn’t mean even more people didn’t die with Covid, but an alleged “Covid” death that wasn’t accompanied by one of the CDC’s specifically-called out diseases” (maybe those 500,000 USA covid deaths don’t actually exist: 24 April 2021 update, read it HERE)

As pointed out by Wilcot, the official USA numbers (that don’t add up) are consistent with what is observed in the United Kingdom’s data. It should be expected this will be the case elsewhere.

Back to Serbia:

If we take the ‘official’ Covid death rate 0.9% or 4,700 deaths (necessarily includes the ‘missing’ flu and other untold manner of death) and rather than apply this to what should be called ‘the includes false positives aggregate’ or 516,000 (reported positives) and instead apply this official death statistic (4,700) attributed to Covid to the 8,700,000 population of Serbia as whole (includes untested & tested negative) to arrive at 0.05%, it is only then a flat national death rate (no significant statistical increase) for the ‘pandemic’ year 2020 begins to make sense because it is only then we can understand what happened to the ‘missing’ flu and other, untold manner of death. They’ve been folded into the Covid statistic. There is no other straightforward explanation. [5]

Now that ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Banson Wilcot PhD is vindicated, let’s shortly note one other article at the ‘offending’ site Principia Scientific International on Covid: the article by another PhD (psychology), Dr Elsa Schieder, on Ivermectin. In short, she simply states what is known to be a scientifically established fact; Ivermectin cures Covid, except in those states that suppress this information about an effective, generic (cheap) drug that should render the vaccine hysteria moot. [6], [7]

The inescapable conclusion is that Covid, although real, and in some cases deadly, is not nearly so lethal on a societal-wide basis as it is presented to us, and need not be nearly so lethal as it presently is. The obvious question is why?

Social Analysis

Firstly, in Western cultures particularly, people lie to themselves, especially when it comes to pecuniary interests versus altruism. There is big money in addressing Covid as a (blown out of proportion) ‘pandemic’ and self importance takes on altruism as a lie (self deceit of doing the right thing) when in fact it is the pecuniary interests (money is power) driving the urge to control. So, the Covid ‘pandemic’ is not as much a conspiracy to control populations (even as strategies are devised to do this) as much as it is a self-importance inflating, power driven meme.

Western style politicians (taking bait from the sociopath oligarchs fishing for them with lobbyists) are narcissists, and narcissists are those personality constructs which are most prone to self deceits. In lay terms, it should be said our leaders are self-aggrandizing morons incapable of comprehending the damage they are causing is by far worse than the damage which should happen if they were to step out of the way, stop politicizing medicine and let the community doctors do their job with a full set of Covid facts available to them (e.g. treat with Ivermectin.)

Insofar as the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International, well, in fact it harbors an Islamophobe associated personality like the Dr Elsa Schieder mentioned above, who it just happens provided accurate information on Ivermectin, together with any number of other trained scientists who do not (for whatever reasons) find a place in mainstream to have a voice. What does it say about Western culture when searching for the better information, one finds it at a site that is not entirely wholesome? How is that somehow more damning than the Western media lies we are fed every day by corporate entities protecting the interests of Western oligarchs and their corrupt self (and societal-wide) political deceits concerning Covid, leading to unnecessary loss of life?

[1] https://principia-scientific.com/uk-covid-conundrum-the-mysterious-case-of-disappearing-flu/

[2] https://knoema.com/atlas/Serbia/Death-rate

[3] https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22272237/flu-cases-down-historic-what-does-it-mean

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3313670-serbian-government-to-adopt-stricter-covid-measures-upper-elementary-school-grades-switch-online

[6] https://principia-scientific.com/ivermectin-miracle-drug-against-covid-19/

[7] https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

“We see 100,000 ukrop troops on the Front, scores of trainloads of troops, armor, ammo and fuel moved into the Donbass region, we hear the heated rhetoric, the preparations for war on both sides of the info sphere”

Or so states my well connected source in Donbass, speaking of activities on either side of the (momentarily) ‘frozen’ conflict. Never mind the Ukrainian military has been shelling the ethnic Russian ‘separatists’ with heavy artillery for weeks (a small detail neglected in Western press.)

When the shit hits the fan on the Donbass (Eastern Ukraine) battlefields again, it will be  a ‘surprise’ and no doubt posed in Western press as a pre-planned ‘act of treachery’ by the ‘Perennially evil Putin’ in the next gambit of the ‘Great Game’ by empire (NATO.)

NATO actually doesn’t give a rats ass for Ukraine other than to use the dumber than f**k nazis (they’d put in charge in the 2014 coup) as cannon fodder to injure & make Russia into a boogeyman. Götterdämmerung? Well, the Western states running with a 19th Century empire mentality in a highly unstable 21st Century always poses the possibility but probably not (yet.) The European NATO states are in no shape to take on Russia, never-minding Russia has no inclination to reoccupy Europe. Of course, as well Russia cannot stand by and allow Kiev to run over the ethnic Russian majority East of the Dnieper river and open to NATO a corridor on the border of Russia’s European heartland. Russia WILL defend the Donbass.

Everyone knows (West & East) that Ukraine is not a viable state as constituted; the Western (Ruthenian) people (especially along the border with Poland) have been long subverted away from their Orthodox roots and are unrecognizable as the same ethnic people (Rusyn) in Belarus, Hungary, Serbia and trans-Carpathia in Ukraine. These people (Ruthenian-Rusyn) have been targeted by cultural subversion for a couple of hundred years in Catholic associated empire (Habsburg, et al) efforts to wrest their identity away from Kievian Rus and ethnic/cultural kinship with Russia. There is  really little new in this; a historical inheritance predating the Nazi proper invasion and predating Napoleon’s invasion of Russia back to the Swedish invasion at the beginning of the 18th Century. Western empire in several incarnations have coveted Russia for over three centuries, and the Western Ukrainians (ethnic Ruthenians, actually) would be naturally aligned with the Polish who’d Catholicized them and it should come as little surprise these people sided with the Nazis (proper) in WWII because they cannot be rehabilitated in any sense of coexistence with Russia and Russians.

It is in the region of the Polish border where the Ukrainian (Nazi collaborator) Stephan Bandera nazi element/legacy is absolutely entrenched (formerly Orthodox but now ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholics answering to Rome), a community deeply saturated with antipathy to Russia and these ‘people’ (if they can recalled that) will never integrate to a Ukraine of the East with its majority ethnic Russian (Orthodox) population. Both sides (NATO/Russia) know this.

Rather than negotiate a reasonable divorce that would split Ukraine into two states with the Dnieper River as the rough boundary (Kiev and Odessa should be in the East) along ethnic lines, NATO simply intends the inevitable Ukraine breakup will happen in such a way as to make Russia into the Western Press’ boogeyman.

I doubt it’s going to lead to WWIII, Europe isn’t ready for this war, it’ll likely just work out as an expensive exercise to make Russia into the villain, little more than that. How much territory Russia will take will depend on kinetic developments to some extent… but I expect Kiev and Odessa could easily be annexed to Russia (perhaps later divided between Russia and a ‘proper’ Ukraine.) There’s possibility of a triple partition; in general terms an ethnic Ruthenian Western (Poland border area) ‘nazified’ sector nobody will want, a central sector populated in majority by proper ethnic Ukrainians and East of the Dnieper which is largely ethnic Russian majority.

The nazis (literally represented in Azov Battalion et al) will begin their offensive and the Russian army will outflank the Donbass front and cut off the Ukrainian supply lines (taking Kiev in the process) and NATO, after having pumped in enough weapons and munitions to insure a bloodbath, will allow the Ukrainian military to be crushed. This will be the West’s convenient means of disposing of the most radical (out of the closet) nazis, a big no-no (the 21st Century’s nazi meme in the guise of NATO disallows flying any flag except the false flag of democracy.)

No matter the immense amount of casualties this will cause, ‘the more blood the better’ from the Western intelligence agencies propaganda apparatchiks point of view as the entire Western world is propagandized concerning ‘Evil Putin’ and ‘crude Russian aggression.’ Thus, the de facto split of Ukraine is accomplished in a comic strip written by Satan where Western Ukraine (what Russia won’t care to absorb) will be propped up by the West with psychologically infantile territorial claim over a Russian population they had terrorized since February 2014.

Russia will be compelled to defend the Donbass, but for appearances (international law) sake, will have to let the nazis initiate the war, resulting in much higher casualties. ‘Preemptive War’ is an international law oxymoron embraced solely by lawless regimes and adhering to the law is a disadvantage Russia will overcome in it’s impatience that finally decides the most economical means of settling the issue is to evict the nazis altogether from territory East of the Dnieper. Of course the West’s propagandists will take this opportunity to convince its gullible populations ‘Russia’s aggression’ justifies immense, new and limitless armaments purchases in a spiraling out of control geopolitical tension that must inevitably lead to the West’s Götterdämmerung after all.

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

Facebook, Twitter & Youtube (the ‘big boys’), all playing gatekeeper:

“The War on ‘Misinformation’ Claims Two Victims. Truth. And the Right to Treatment.”

At: https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

Archived at: https://archive.li/tXJNW

By Mary Beth Pfeiffer

Two public health battles are being waged right now.

The first, of course, is against the coronavirus.

The second has its sights on a broad and amorphous target called “medical misinformation.” This campaign aims, at least in part, to control what people read, see and know about potential treatments for COVID-19. Firmly in its crosshairs is a cheap, generic drug that just might turn this pandemic around, ivermectin.

In this second battle, YouTube videos are removed. Twitter accounts with thousands of followers are purged. Facebook posts and groups are disappeared. These are the overt acts of censorship of ivermectin and other treatment contenders.

More covert is the mainstream media’s aversion to reporting virtually anything promising about early COVID treatment, including on 42 studies that collectively say ivermectin could reduce COVID deaths by 75 to 83 percent. What little is reported is that ivermectin is experimental and unproven – a drug that’s used to treat scabies and river blindness in people and parasites in horses.

For perhaps those reasons, Cheryl Jarrett, 64, initially rejected her doctor’s suggestion that she take ivermectin when diagnosed with what seemed a mild case of COVID. She changed her mind on day three, when she struggled to breathe after climbing her stairs, and a scan showed COVID infiltrates in 25 percent of her lungs.

“I took it,” she told me. “Within 2 hours I was fine.” She tried the stairs again. No problem.

There are many stories like Jarrett’s. You won’t find them in the press or on Wikipedia, a common source of ivermectin information. Share them on Facebook and you might get barred from posting, as Jarrett’s doctor, Bruce Boros, recently was.

Control of the ivermectin message ostensibly is done under the guise of protecting public health. But the effort is instead doing the opposite, according to interviews with advocates, doctors and analysts.

“There’s a war on misinformation which is hurting good information,” said Dr. Pierre Kory, president of a group of doctors advocating the drug called Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, or FLCCC. “We have all the data showing massive mortality benefits of ivermectin. The less that’s being known about it, the more deaths are resulting.”

Where It Began

The effort to manage COVID treatment information has its roots, in part, in a sad chapter in American science and journalism: The Trump endorsement last spring of hydroxychloroquine. In an instant, early treatment was turned into a right-wing myth of interest only to Fox News. The rest of the press was merciless in repeating assertions that a reliable pharmaceutical workhorse used for several diseases was dangerous for COVID. Multiple studies have since refuted that and shown effectiveness in early illness, something most people do not know.

Dr. Mobeen Syed was among the first last March to explore HCQ’s potential in a YouTube video that went viral and landed him in a love-it/hate-it, right/left firestorm. “I started getting so many threats,” he said, prompting him to take the piece down himself.

After that, however, YouTube itself decided what the 250,000 subscribers to Drbeen Medical Lectures should see, removing videos willy-nilly, it seemed, on Vitamin D, remdesivir and, what others said was frequently censored, ivermectin.

Among other examples of this new censorship trend:

  • On Jan. 31, Facebook removed a page called Ivermectin for MDs Team, with 10,200 members from more than 100 countries. The last straw was a post on the Slovak Ministry of Health’s decision to allow use of ivermectin, which Facebook censors “believe is harmful to physical integrity,” the administrator wrote. Facebook also ruled that news of ivermectin approval by a southern state in Brazil violated its standards. Put another way, the social media giant did not like two independent government decisions and thought it knew better.
  • On Jan. 12, Twitter ruled a tweet by the Brazilian Ministry of Health — 1.2 million followers — was “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information.” Why? It urged people with COVID symptoms to “go to a Health Unit and request early treatment.”
  • More egregious, YouTube recently expunged two videos posted by a U.S. Senate committee on Dr. Kory’s ivermectin testimony. Further, it purged a video in which a scientist discussed his review of ivermectin as part of a project for a World Health Organization-hosted agency called Unitaid. YouTube even removed a video on its censorship of ivermectin.

In a hint at how vast the censorship is, Facebook asserted proudly in a Feb. 8 website post that it had “removed more than 12 million pieces of content on Facebook and Instagram containing misinformation that could lead to imminent physical harm.” Seven of my posts, on an article I wrote with multiple links to the science of ivermectin, were stricken with that label. (I got off on a 14-hour posting ban.)

My efforts were fruitless to get Facebook, Twitter or Google, which owns YouTube, to explain the methodology it uses to censor. In a public post, YouTube says it disallows information that “contradicts local health authorities” and the World Health Organization. Twitter maintains it culls “content that is demonstrably false or misleading and may lead to significant risk of harm.”

But who actually decides on a video or post? Are algorithms by technicians making the decisions or scientists and doctors? Should government guidelines be the ultimate yardstick when these are evolving — and sometimes wrong?

At the outset of COVID, officials actually advised against wearing masks and treating COVID with corticosteroids; both are common practices now that are saving lives.

Moreover, government decisions in a previous plague show how fallible they can be. In 1987, HIV-AIDS activists implored Dr. Anthony Fauci to endorse the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent a virulent AIDS-related pneumonia. The government waited two years for more data, during which, Sean Strub recounts in his memoir, “Body Counts,” 17,000 people died.

What Fauci wanted then and wants today is a bigger, better, well-designed study – even if the result of waiting for it is a higher death toll.

Steve Kirsch, a California entrepreneur, has funded research on an anti-depressant-turned-anti-COVID treatment called fluvoxamine that holds huge promise for eliminating COVID early. As with ivermectin, the drug is meeting resistance.

In a Feb. 26 article in Quora, Kirsch argued that the bar for acceptance of already approved drugs must be lowered, given their known safety and efficacy. “We have evidence-based treatments today that have a high probability to significantly reduce the hospitalization and death…with virtually no incremental risk,” he wrote. “It thus is wrong, and an unnecessary loss of life, to ‘wait for more data.’” He called fluvoxamine and ivermectin the two most promising drugs for early COVID treatment.

Big Brother at Work

On Dec. 27, Twitter suspended an account called @CovidAnalysis, which had been followed by nearly 7,000 people. The account, run by anonymous scientists, routinely tweeted on COVID treatment research, and continues to summarize and analyze its implications on its website. I’m not alone in relying on its informed interpretation, which is at times guarded and critical.

Twitter provided no warning before exorcising the account and hasn’t answered the group’s request for an explanation since. Commented one follower, @c19d3k2, “I really have to wonder how close to #1984 we have edged by now.”

Other accounts have also been purged, including that of a prominent and early hydroxychloroquine supporter, Dr. Zev Zelenko, who had more than 150,000 followers.

Put aside for a minute the implications of efforts to control what Americans and citizens around the world know – about anything. Not too long ago, such control was unthinkable.

Now consider that ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug that is on the WHO list of Essential Medicines. Among more than three dozen trials are 19 peer-reviewed studies and 21 randomized controlled trials. They show ivermectin works at various stages against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It stopped infection cold in healthcare workers in three Argentinian studies and one involving 4,000 people in India. It shut down early illness in studies from Pakistan and Bangladesh. It kept people alive in Egypt and in a study in Broward County, Florida.

Doctors largely don’t know this. Nor does the general public.

I found too many examples of early treatment censorship to list them all here, including the purging of a 4,000-member Facebook group called COVEXIT.com that often discusses hydroychloroquine, and removal of a popular video by Dr. Christy Risinger imploring regulators to consider ivermectin science. Nonetheless, the blackout surely isn’t complete. There is still plenty of ivermectin information on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

But the censor’s knife, the image of the drug as a right-wing construct, and the resistance of the media to report most anything on early treatments have all taken a toll. Ivermectin, it seems, is unacceptable in public discussion of early COVID treatment.

Here’s how this plays out: Three press reports explored the myriad factors driving down COVID in India — on NPR, the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. Yet each conspicuously made no mention of treatment, despite India’s widespread use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which surely deserved discussion.

I asked a widely published science writer, Esther Landuis, her thoughts on this: “In general it seems that the over politicized hydroxychloroquine debacle has muddied the waters for mainstream science magazines,” she told me. “Many outlets are afraid to be wrong about another repurposed drug; they are waiting for definitive data from a Phase 3 RCT (randomized controlled trial) with thousands of patients.”

The Upshot of Silencing

Ivermectin research shows the drug is most effective in preventing and quelling early infection – uses that would keep people out of hospitals and prevent long-haul symptoms. Yet ivermectin censorship robs patients of treatment with a safe drug that could be used off label and with informed consent. Many drugs are used this way, particularly in ICUs, where patients may be on a dozen medications in hopes that something works.

But ask for ivermectin for a family member, and you’ll likely be told, as one family member of a patient was, “We don’t use that here.” As a consequence, families of hospitalized patients sometimes go to great lengths to get it.

The family of a Texas man, 67, plotted to smuggle ivermectin to him in food then had lawyer intervene to secure the drug. Two New York state families got court orders to allow women, 80 and 65 years old, to be given ivermectin – but only prescribed by their personal physicians. When Dr. Erica Espinosa thought she would lose her husband – also a physician — to COVID-19, she arranged to fly him to a Houston hospital (six air ambulance companies declined) because it uses a protocol that includes ivermectin. Few hospitals do.

In those four cases, all but the Texas man rallied after getting ivermectin, and his treatment delay surely did not help. His death on Feb. 5 devastated his family; he left a wife of 40 years, two sons and daughters-in-law, and six grandchildren.

Dr. Bruce Boros, Cheryl Jarrett’s doctor and the owner of three urgent care centers in the Florida Keys, recently served time in what he and others call “Facebook Jail,” having run afoul of ivermectin censors. That’s small potatoes to Boros, however, who treated one hospitalized patient, Kyle Carter, by having ivermectin delivered to his bedside and directing him by phone on how much to take. (The hospital said it didn’t have the drug and then delayed giving it while Carter struggled to breathe.)

“Within 12 hours,” Carter told me, “I was feeling pretty fantastic. I knew that something had changed.” He still doesn’t know if the hospital was aware he’d taken ivermectin.

Two hundred patients later, Boros says this: “If your doctor doesn’t give this to you, get another doctor.”

If only it were that easy.

***Mary Beth Pfeiffer is an investigative journalist and the author of two books. Her website: www.thefirstepidemic.com.

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s and not necessarily those of TrialSite News LLC.

Explore Further:

Read in English

iRNK: „To je genska terapija, a ne vakcina“

Deo serije „Priče o kovidu protivurečne naučnim“ na ovom blogu. Intervju koji sledi, sa dr Dejvidom Martinom, je u skladu sa nekoliko drugih kontra-narativa od strane naučnika iz serije Covid 19.

*

Intervju @ https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/
Arhiva @ https://archive.li/gpG3w

Dr Dejvid Martin, osnivač i predsednik kompanije M-CAM Inc., osporava naše pretpostavke o novim iRNK KOVID-19 vakcinama. Citirajući same farmaceutske kompanije, Dejvid napominje da ovo nisu vakcine, već zapravo, genska terapija. Objašnjava šta nam vakcine mogu učiniti, šta oni obećavaju da nam mogu učiniti, i kako da napravimo razliku. U nastavku je transkript intervjua Hilde Gor sa dr Dejvidom Martinom.

HG: Imam prijatelje koji su primili jednu od novih vakcina protiv Kovida-19, a imate ih i Vi. To su najbrže razvijene vakcine u čitavoj našoj medicinskoj istoriji i mnogi ljudi staju u red da bi ih primili što pre. Od čega su napravljene? Šta nam mogu učiniti? Zašto ih promovišu i ko to čini? Ovo je epizoda 292, a naš gost je dr Dejvid Martin. Diplomirao je na Univerzitetu Gošen, magistrirao na Bol Stejt (Ball State) Univerzitetu i doktorirao na Univerzitetu Virdžinija. On je inovator, profesor i čovek sa obimnom biografijom punom dostignuća.

Sa Dejvidom smo se fokusirali na iRNK KOVID-19 vakcine. On prolazi glavna pitanja koja ih okružuju. Pregleda tehnologiju iRNK i objašnjava kako se radi o genskoj terapiji, a ne o vakcini i našem uobičajenom razumevanju te reči. Sagledava probleme sa PCR testovima i čak nam pomaže da razumemo naše šire vanredno stanje. Na kraju, objašnjava kako nas strah na podsvesnom nivou može naterati da se odupremo istini.

Dobrodošli u emisiju, Dejvid.

DM: Hvala Vam. Divno je biti ovde.

HG: Imam prijateljicu koji radi u školskom sistemu. Dobila je pismo u kojem se sugeriše da je ona ključni radnik i da treba da primi jednu od ovih novih vakcina koje su u razvoju protiv ovog virusa KOVID. Šta bi trebalo da zna pre nego što to učini?

DM: Počnimo sa vašom uvodnom rečenicom. Nijedna reč u nizu koju ste upotrebili ne postoji u stvarnosti. Razotkrijmo to. Pre svega, ne postoji vakcina koja je u razvoju ili se planira da bude vakcina protiv virusa SARS-CoV-2. To ne postoji. To nije razvijeno. Nije čak ni 2021. godine u razmišljanju. To je jedna od nesrećnih stvari u vezi sa onim što se događa u propagandnom ratu, koji se odvija u februaru, Svetska zdravstvena organizacija je potpuno jasno stavila do znanja da SARS-CoV-2 ili virus i KOVID-19, što je serija kliničkih prezentacija bolesti, bile su dve različite stvari.

HG: Pravite zanimljivu razliku. Čula sam da je SARS-CoV-2 „virus“ i da je KOVID-19 bolest. Da li to govorite?

DM: KOVID 19 nije bolest. To je niz kliničkih simptoma. To je džinovski spektar stvari povezanih sa onim što je nekada bilo povezano sa gripom i drugim febrilnim bolestima. Problem koji imamo je taj što je u februaru, Svetska zdravstvena organizacija jasno izjavila da ne bi trebalo da postoji mešanje ove dve stvari. Jedno je virus po njihovoj definiciji, a drugo je skup kliničkih simptoma. U februaru je postojala iluzija da je SARS-CoV-2 izazvao KOVID-19. Problem sa tom definicijom i sa očekivanjima je da većina ljudi pozitivnih na testu metodom RT-PCR za testiranje, zbog fragmenata onoga što je povezano sa SARS-CoV-2, uopšte nije bolesna. Iluzija, da virus uzrokuje bolest, se raspala. To je razlog zašto su izmislili termin asimptomatski nosač.

HG: Drugim rečima, mogla bih da dobijem pozitivan rezultat ovog PCR testa i iz razloga što nisam asimptomatična, ono što se dešava je to što uopšte nisam bolesna. Oni su dali lažnu pretpostavku da SARS-CoV-2 uzrokuje KOVID-19.

DM: To nikada nije bio slučaj, nikada nije bio i nikada neće biti slučaj. Postoji uzročna izjava koja se daje u medijima gde je, na primer, Džons Hopkins ili platforma za praćenje KOVID ili bilo koja od ovih stvari namerno zavarala ljude. U Virdžiniji nema 5.000 novih slučajeva. Potencijalno može biti nekoliko hiljada pozitivnih PCR testova, ali većina ljudi koji imaju pozitivan test nikada neće imati niti jedan simptom. Većina ljudi koji imaju simptome nemaju pozitivne testove.

HG: Znam neke pojedince koji su to rekli. Rekli su: „Osećao sam se bolesno, a bio sam negativan na testu. Moja rođaka, koja se osećala odlično, bila je pozitivna na testu.“

DM: Uvek će biti tako. Uzročna veza koju su stvorili mediji, CDC i KOVID praćenje, a to je saradnja između Blumberg fondacije, Gejts fondacije, Zakerberg fondacije i drugih, zvanični brojevi koje zateknemo preko ekrana svakog jutra na našim računarima, na našim televizijama, ti brojevi namerno lažu. Oni su svesno lagali od nastanka ovoga. Ne postoji uzročno-posledična veza između ovih stvari koje nikada nisu utvrđene. Nikada nije bilo ni približno utvrđeno. Imamo situaciju u kojoj je iluzija problema u tome što ljudi kažu: „Ne želim da dobijem KOVID-19.“ Misle na to da ne žele da se zaraze virusom. Problem je u tome što te dve stvari nisu međusobno povezane.

Virusna infekcija nije dokumentovana u većini onoga što nazivaju slučajevima. Ne postoji osnov za takvu povezanost, osim za manipulaciju javnosti. To je prva polovina problema. Druga polovina problema je u tome što ono što se naziva vakcinacijom, što, kao što dobro znate kada neko kaže reč vakcinacija, javnost to razume kao da se lečite oslabljenim ili živim virusom ili fragmentom oslabljenog virusa i da je lečenje namenjeno sprečavanju zaraze i sprečavanju prenošenja infekcije, ono što vakcina u uobičajenoj definiciji vakcine treba da učini.

Problem je što, u slučaju Moderne i Fajzera (Pfizer), ovo nije vakcina. Ovo je genska terapija. To je hemoterapijsko sredstvo koje je genska terapija. To nije vakcina. Šta ona radi? Šalje lanac sintetičke RNK u ljudsko biće i u njemu priziva na stvaranje spajk proteina S1, koji je patogen. To je toksin u ljudskim bićima. Ovo ne samo da vas ne sprečava da se razbolite, već čini da vaše telo proizvodi ono od čega se razbolite.

HG: U tom smislu, to zvuči kao vakcina?

DM: Ne, nikako, jer bi vakcina trebalo da pokrene imunitet. Ne bi trebalo da pokrene u vama da proizvodite toksin.

HG: Tako se ovo razlikuje.

DM: Nije mala razlika. To uopšte nije isto. Ovo je javna manipulacija pogrešnim prikazivanjem kliničkog lečenja. To nije vakcinacija. To nije sprečavanje infekcije. To nije uređaj koji sprečava prenos. To je sredstvo uz koje je vaše telo prisiljeno da stvori toksin sa kojim se, navodno, vaše telo nekako navikne nositi, ali za razliku od vakcine, koja treba da pokrene imuni odgovor, ovo treba da pokrene stvaranje toksina.

HG: Način na koji sam čula da su kompanije govorile je da ovako naučite svoje telo da se bori protiv ovog virusa kada se pojavi. Tako oni to predstavljaju.

DM: Njihovo kliničko ispitivanje nije uključivalo ništa od toga, čak ni mogućnost unutar kliničkog ispitivanja. Kliničko ispitivanje nije merilo prisustvo ili odsustvo virusa ili fragmenta virusa. Kliničko ispitivanje nije merilo mogućnost suzbijanja prenosa, kliničko ispitivanje nije merilo nijednu od tih stvari. Ovo je slučaj pogrešnog predstavljanja tehnologije i to je učinjeno isključivo kako bi mogli da se stave pod okrilje zakona o javnom zdravstvu koji eksploatiše vakcinaciju.

HG: Ono što kažete razlikuje se od onoga što je većina nas čula u udarnim vestima, pa čak i u saopštenjima za štampu velikih kompanija.

DM: To je zato što ljudi ne čitaju stvarna klinička ispitivanja. Ako pročitate klinička ispitivanja, ništa od onoga što kažem nije nimalo različito. U stvari, same kompanije su rekle ono što ja govorim. Rekli su da ne mogu da testiraju postojanje ili odsustvo virusa i da ne mogu da testiraju prenosivost, jer su rekli da bi to bilo nepraktično. I same kompanije su priznale svaku stvar koju govorim, ali koriste javnu manipulaciju rečju vakcina da bi kooptirale javnost u verovanju da dobijaju nešto što ne dobijaju. Ovo vas neće sprečiti da dobijete koronavirus. To vas neće sprečiti da se razbolite. U stvari, naprotiv, mnogo češće ćete se razboljevati od samog virusa.

HG: Kako to možete reći tako sa sigurnošću?

DM: Zato što podaci pokazuju upravo to, jer ljudi koji su primili vakcinu, do vremena kada su primili drugu dozu, 80% tih ljudi imalo je jednu ili više kliničkih prezentacija KOVID-19, 80% ljudi koji imaju infekciju prema RT-PCR nisu imali simptome uopšte.

HG: Ljudi ga dobijaju više od „vakcine?“

DM: Da. Dobićete simptome KOVID-19 primanjem genske terapije predstavljene kao vakcina. Dobićete simptome KOVID-a u 80% slučajeva. Ako ste izloženi SARS-CoV-2 prema RT-PCR, u 80% slučajeva, uopšte nećete imati simptome.

HG: Koja je svrha dobijanja ove vakcine ili ove genske manipulacije kako je vi nazivate?

DM: To je tehnologija genske terapije. To je Modernina lična definicija. Držimo se onoga što kažu da jesu. Korist ne postoji. Ljudsko biće će biti potencijalno izloženo neklasifikovanim, i kratkoročnim i dugoročnim rizicima promene svoje RNK i DNK zbog izloženosti ovoj genskoj terapiji. Ovo je važno shvatiti, nema kliničke koristi, osim što je u određenim slučajevima infekcije CoV i / ili izloženosti KOVIDU-19 bilo nekoliko. Pod tim mislim na manje od nekoliko stotina od skoro 40.000 u kliničkom ispitivanju. Nekoliko stotina ljudi imalo je nekoliko dana slabije simptome kod genske terapije u poređenju sa drugom kontrolnom grupom. Čak i u tom poređenju, ako pogledate metodologiju koja se nalazi u objavljenim radovima za klinička ispitivanja, oni se igraju sa podacima, jer ono što rade je razdvajanje reaktivnosti, što znači način na koji osoba reaguje kada je izložena genskoj terapiji, odvajaju neželjene događaje od stvarnih simptoma KOVID-a.

Problem je što simptomi KOVID-a uključuju stvari poput groznice, bolova u telu, bolova u mišićima, slabosti u mišićima i slične stvari. Rešili su se velikog dela onoga što bi se moglo smatrati simptomima KOVID-a, nazivajući ih neželjenim događajima. Ako izvučete te podatke i kažete: „Uporedite populaciju koja je dobila gensku terapiju sa populacijom koja nije dobila gensku terapiju.“ Populacija koja je dobila gensku terapiju imala je mnogo više bolesti, uključujući simptome KOVID-19, nego populacija koja nije dobila genetsku terapiju, ali zato što su ogroman broj stvari klasifikovali kao neželjene događaje, tehnički su se zaneli i došli do ovih smešnih 90% plus efikasnost. Efikasnost nije bila efikasna u blokiranju bolesti. Bilo je efikasno u navodnom skraćivanju trajanja simptoma.

HG: Ljudi se plaše da su spremni da veruju u ono što žele da veruju i zadržavajući onaj delić informacija koje ste podelili, da će verovatnoća primene vakcine protiv gripa, „Bar ublažiti moje simptome i ograničiti trajanje moje bolesti.“ Drže se tog jednog delića informacija koji je bio manipulacija podacima, kao što kažete, i drže se nade da će ovo biti njihova spasonosna milost da im pomogne da izbegnu KOVID-19.

DM: Ništa od ovoga im neće pomoći da izbegnu KOVID-19 i ništa od ovoga im neće pomoći da izbegnu SARS-CoV-2.

HG: Govorili smo uglavnom o vakcini Moderna i Fajzer koje su genska terapija. Da li je još neka u izradi ili dolazi na tržište, koja ne koristi gensku terapiju?

DM: Ispitivanje AstraZeneca Oksford koristi virusni fragment. Više je u tehnološkom smislu onoga što bismo vi i ja mogli istorijski smatrati vakcinom. Ispitivanje AstraZeneca Oksford bilo je zanimljivo gledati, jer imaju problem sa metodologijom koji je prilično veliki izazov u pogledu pokušaja obmanjivanja podataka i razumevanja šta se dešava bilo sa strane bezbednosti ili efikasnosti. Razlog je jednostavan, jer u određenim slučajevima ispitivanje AstraZeneca Oksford nije koristilo kontrolnu grupu sa fiziološkim rastvorom. Koristili su drugu vakcinu kao kontrolu. Drugim rečima, namestili su karte. Čine da izgleda kao da su nekako neutralni u poređenju sa drugom vakcinacijom, u nekoliko svojih napora prikupljanja podataka.

Kao rezultat toga, imamo problem sa metodologijom, koji su usput kritikovali brojni klinički naučnici. Veći je problem što još uvek ne mere osetljivost na viruse i prenos virusa. To su dve noge stolice koje su potrebne svima da bi rekli da vakcinišu stanovništvo iz razloga javnog zdravlja. Ne postoji način na koji. Ovo je jednostavna stvar koju morate shvatiti. Kao kada bih rekao: „Svi moraju da uzimaju hemoterapiju zbog raka koji mogu dobiti.“

HG: Ljudi bi Vam se smejali u lice.

DM: Upravo se to događa. Ovo nije profilaktički. Ovo nam ne pomaže. Rečeno nam je da se podvrgnemo lečenju bolesti koju nemamo i najverovatnije je nećemo imati. Rečeno nam je da pažljivim marketinškim manipulacijama i propagandom nazivamo ove stvari vakcinama za javno zdravlje.

HG: U prošlosti smo ih uzimali iz tog razloga. „Nemam boginje. Ne želim da dobijem morbile, pa ću da primim ovu vakcinu protiv morbila. ” Naučeni smo da prihvatimo takav pristup.

DM: To je priča koju svako očekuje.

HG: Zašto to ne očekujete? Zbog čega ste zaronili duboko?

DM: To nije ono što se meri. To nije ono što se radi i ne radi se o ovoj tehnologiji. iRNK nije vakcinacija. To je genska terapija koja je prvobitno razvijena za lečenje karcinoma. Zbog toga koristim analogiju hemoterapije. Ovo nije vakcinacija.

HG: Imam kolege, sigurna sam da i Vi imate, prijatelje i poznanike koji će ići na to. Šta možemo reći tim ljudima ili podeliti sa njima što bi ih moglo probuditi?

DM: To je složeno pitanje i odavno sam odabrao da se ne bavim energijom buđenja uspavane metafore, jer činjenica je da su ljudi uslovljeni da reaguju na strah, to je refleksno i nije svesno. Ako ispitamo svoje ponašanje i ono što radimo je sebi na štetu, jer smo uvereni da je na jedan ili drugi način pred nama gora budućnost, to je nešto za šta nemam mogućnost da kažem da će činjenice ikada prevazići . U životu još nisam sreo nekoga ko je dozvolio da neka činjenica prevlada verovanjem. Jednom kada usvojite neko verovanje, činjenice nisu dobrodošle, jer ono što one čine, ne samo da optužuju vaše verovanje, već i energiju koju vi držite i koja kaže: „Moram da verujem u ono što mi je rečeno“.

Čim pokušate da stupite u kontakt sa činjenicama, sve što uradite je da pokrenete sukob. Ono što radim je da pokušavam da uzmem složenu nauku i složeno izveštavanje i trudim se da ona bude pristupačna i lako razumljiva. Cilj je da u određenim slučajevima ljudi kažu: „Ne mogu ni da verujem da je istina ono što je rekao.“ Dobra stvar je što ne morate verovati da je istina ono što kažem, jer ja ne vrednujem verovanje. Ja vrednujem objektivnu stvarnost činjenica. Ispostavilo se da je u ovom konkretnom slučaju jednostavno i otvoreno reći bilo kojoj osobi u Moderninoj sopstvenoj Komisiji za hartije od vrednosti, oni su to potpuno jasno stavili do znanja da je njihova tehnologija tehnologija genske terapije. U svom kliničkom ispitivanju, potpuno su jasno stavili do znanja da ne mogu meriti prisustvo ili odsustvo virusa i ne mogu meriti prisustvo ili odsustvo prenosa virusa. Svaka pojedinačna stvar koju su predstavljali da rade, a koja pogađa javno razumevanje šta je vakcinacija, izričito su rekli, „Oni to ne rade“.

HG: Bili ste pažljivi i izneli ste činjenice meni i publici i zahvalni smo. Želim da vas pitam na ličniji način, da li biste uopšte uradili ovaj PCR test ako biste morali na putovanje? Dobijam različite vrste e-mailova i ljudi me kontaktiraju, čak ni ne govorim o vakcini ili tehnologiji genske terapije, ali određene stvari su potrebne da bi se učestvovalo u životu.

DM: Aktivno sam uključen u mnoge značajne parnice koje pokušavaju da razotkriju zaveru koju pokreće PCR, kao i intervencije medicinske protivmere. U prethodnici sam sa još nekoliko duša koje se bore za prava građana da donose odluke zasnovane na činjenicama, a ne na propagandi. Činjenica je da PCR test nikada nije odobren kao dijagnostika. Nije dijagnostički. Ne postoji ništa u vezi sa izvođenjem PCR testa koji čini bilo šta drugo osim pojačavanja propagandnog narativa. Ne govori vam ništa.

Razlog zašto ne radimo testiranje na grip je taj što ne želimo da priznamo činjenicu da većina ljudi koji su u bolnici, koji su bolesni i koji umiru doživljavaju potpuno isto što se događalo svake godine, što je je bolest slična gripu, prehladi i pneumoniji. U mnogim slučajevima, kada neko ima kompromitovani imunitet ili drugi komorbiditet dovodi do smrtnih slučajeva. Tužna je stvarnost da se to događa, ali deo je ljudskog iskustva da se to događa. Činjenica je da PCR test neće postaviti ili neće potvrditi bilo koju dijagnozu, jer PCR testovi ne mogu potvrditi dijagnozu.

HG: Intervjuisala sam dr Toma Kauana i dr Endija Kaufmana, i oni kažu istu stvar. Osoba koja je smislila ili razvila PCR test kaže da se on ne treba koristiti za dijagnozu bilo čega.

DM: Kao i FDA, tako i svi ostali. Jedini razlog zašto koristimo PCR testove je taj što guverneri i Ministarstvo zdravlja i socijalne službe održavaju vanredno stanje. Onog trenutka kada se ukine to vanredno stanje u bilo kojoj državi ili zemlji, PCR test neće smeti da se koristi. Održavamo vanredno stanje kako bi proizvođači mogli da nastave da prodaju stvar koja nikada ne bi bila odobrena da je predmet kliničkog ispitivanja. To važi i za ono što se naziva vakcinama. Genska terapija koju Moderna i Fajzer rade, obe bi bile odmah suspendovane ako se vanredno stanje ukine. Ljudi ne razumeju da ako ukinete vanredno stanje, cela kuća od karata pada.

HG: To je nešto drugo za šta se vi i vaš tim zalažete?

DM: To je zato što autorizacija za upotrebu u hitnim slučajevima spada u vanredne situacije.

HG: Da li je ovo jedan od razloga, da li mislite da su klevetali hidroksihlorokin ili bilo koji drugi protokol koji bi mogao da leči simptome SARS-CoV-2?

DM: Bez pogovora. Ako pogledate istorijski, već dugi niz godina dr Antoni Fauci iz NIAID-a održava godišnji sastanak savetodavnog odbora. Svake godine on jadikuje nad činjenicom da pokušavaju da naprave ovu univerzalnu vakcinu protiv gripa, na koju se poziva kao na vakcinu za novorođenčad. Oni to pokušavaju godinama, ali nije uspelo. Ovo je prilika da Antoni Fauci dobije ono što nije uspeo da dobije pravnim sredstvima, a to je da želi da stigne do mesta gde primorava stanovništvo na vakcinu. Manipuliše ovom situacijom da bi primorao populaciju na vakcinu. Činjenica je da je zaboravio da bi, ako namerava da primora stanovništvo na vakcinu, to barem trebalo da bude vakcina.

HG: Koji bi bili njegovi motivi za to?

DM: Uvek je bio finansijski. Ulog su milijarde dolara, a NIAID je u suštini inkubator za farmaceutsku industriju. Služi blagajnicima koji su mu u NIAID-u u karijeri omogućili da upravlja 191 milijardom dolara.

HG: Ovde ima mnogo toga za razmotranje. Dali ste nam puno prostora za razmišljanje. Želimo ponovo da razgovaramo s vama, ali recimo da sam osoba koja je čitala sve ove činjenice i uverili ste me. Ne želim da dobijem ovu tehnologiju genske terapije. Ne želim čak ni da dobijem vakcinu AstraZeneca. Ne želim da dobijem ništa od ovoga, ali pod pritiskom sam zbog posla ili zbog putovanja, šta biste mi savetovali?

DM: Ne mogu uopšte nikoga da savetujem. To nije moja uloga, ali ono što vam mogu reći je da je ovo odluka koju će bilo koje ljudsko biće na kraju morati da donese na osnovu toga da li se ili ne odlučuje za život ili se odlučuje za robovanje. Ovo je kao u bilo kojoj tački istorije u kojoj morate donositi odluke koje se zasnivaju na onome što je moralno i etično i ispravno s obzirom na vaš osećaj odgovornosti i poslušnosti. Činjenica je kao da ste vezali sigurnosni pojas, kao da radite čitav niz drugih stvari, vaš izbor za bavljenje nekom aktivnošću na kraju će biti odluka sa kojom morate živeti.

Neću dodirnuti stvar i neću dozvoliti da moje telo napadne stvar koja je razvijena na neetičan i nezakonit način. Neću dozvoliti nikome da ima priliku da manipuliše mojim genetskim kodom. To se neće dogoditi. Ako to znači da to me to košta određenog poslodavca ili određene veze ili bilo čega drugog, moj život vredi više od toga. Uslovljeni smo da upadnemo u ovu zamku, koja glasi: „Možda nećemo uspeti da uđemo u avion.“ Dakle, vozite.

HG: Razmišljala sam o tome. Počeću da se vozim čamcem.

DM: Neću dozvoliti da moja budućnost i moja dobrobit budu robovi komercijalnom interesu koji pokušava da iznudi nešto od mene ili me uceni u nečemu.

HG: To zvuči kao život. To zvuči kao sloboda za razliku od ropstva. Cenim to. Mislim da je to ono što ćemo čuti u fondaciji. Želimo da ljudi žive najbolje što mogu, preuzimaju odgovornost za sopstveno zdravlje i traže načine da ga neguju, koji možda nije najmoderniji ili najisplativiji za zdravstvene kompanije, ali će biti najbolji za njih. Dozvolite mi da zaključim tako što ću vam postaviti pitanje koje često postavljam na kraju. Ako bi čitalac mogao učiniti jednu stvar da poboljša ili održi svoje zdravlje, šta biste mu preporučili?

DM: Izaberite pre svega promenu načina života i odaberite je sa nekim drugim. Počnite da vežbate, bavite se zdravijim načinom ishrane. Sve što uključuje spajanje osećaja blagostanja, što uključuje druženje, ishranu, vitalnost i osnaživanje vas samih da postanete osoba koja ima, ne samo konceptualnu ideju o tome šta je zdravlje, već ima i doživljeno iskustvo o tome. Što više imate proživljeno zdravstveno iskustvo, manje vam se može reći da se ne osećate dobro kada ste potpuno dobro.

HG: Hvala Vam puno na vašem vremenu, Dejvide. Ovo je bio sjajan razgovor.

DM: Zaista nema na čemu. Čuvajte se.

*

Transcendentna korupcija i korona virus prvi deo

Transcendentna korupcija i korona virus – drugi deo

Kovid: Suzbijanje naučnih kontra-narativa

Kovid vs grip: Gde je kosa, alatka Smrti, u 2020-2021?

*

Srbija

Čitajte na srpskom

Part of the ‘Covid Scientific Counter-Narratives’ series at this blog. The following interview, with Dr David Martin PhD, is consistent with the several other counter-narratives by scientists in the Covid 19 series.

*

Interview @ https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/

Archived @ https://archive.li/71A7x & @ https://archive.li/1sYyp

Dr. David Martin, founder and chairman of M-CAM Inc, challenges our presuppositions about the new mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. Quoting the pharmaceutical companies themselves, David suggests that these are not vaccines, but, in actuality, gene therapy. He explains what the vaccines may do to us, what they are promising they can do for us, and how to distinguish the difference.

The below transcript is the Hilda Gore interview with Dr. David Martin.

HG: I have friends who’ve gotten one of the new COVID-19 vaccines and you do too. These are the fastest developed vaccines in all of our medical history and many people are lining up to get them as soon as possible. What are they made of? What would they do to us? Why are they being promoted and by whom? This is episode 292 and our guest is Dr. David Martin. He received his Undergrad degree from Goshen College, Master’s of Science from Ball State University and Doctorate from the University of Virginia. He is an innovator, a professor, and a man with an extensive resume of accomplishments.

With David, we focused on the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. He goes over the major issues surrounding them. He reviews the mRNA technology and explains how it is gene therapy, not a vaccine and our usual understanding of the word. He reviews the problems with the PCR tests and even helps us understand our broader state of emergency. Finally, he explains how fear on a subconscious level can make us resist the truth.

Welcome to the show, David.

DM: Thank you. It’s lovely to be here.

HG: I have a friend that works in the school system. She got a letter suggesting that she’s an essential worker and that she needs to get this one of these new vaccines being developed against this COVID virus. What should she know before she goes for it?

DM: Let’s start with your opening sentence. None of the words in the order that you use exist in reality. Let’s unpack that. First of all, there is no vaccine that is in development or contemplated that is a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That doesn’t exist. That hasn’t been developed. It isn’t even, in 2021, in contemplation. It’s one of the unfortunate things about what’s going on in the propaganda war, which is in February, the World Health Organization made it abundantly clear that SARS-CoV-2 or the virus and COVID-19, which is a series of clinical presentations of illness were two distinct things.

HG: You’re making an interesting distinction. I have heard that SARS-CoV-2 is “the virus” and that COVID-19 is the disease. Is that what you’re saying?

DM: COVID 19 is not a disease. It is a series of clinical symptoms. It is a giant umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases. The problem that we have is that in February, the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between the two of these things. One is a virus, in their definition and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The illusion in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-19. The problem with that definition and with the expectation is that the majority of people who test positive using the RT-PCR method for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2 are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus causes a disease fell apart. That’s the reason why they invented the term asymptomatic carrier.

HG: In other words, I might get a positive result from this PCR test and the reason I’m not asymptomatic, what’s happening is I’m not sick at all. They’ve made a false assumption that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19.

DM: That’s never been the case, never has been the case and never will be the case. There is a causal statement that is made in the media where, for example, Johns Hopkins or the COVID tracker platform or any of these things has intentionally misled the people. There are not 5,000 new cases in Virginia. There potentially may be several thousand positive PCR tests but most of the people who have a positive test will never have a single symptom. Most of the people who have symptoms do not have positive tests.

HG: I know some individuals who said that thing. They were like, “I was feeling sick and I got a negative test. My sister-in-law, who was feeling great, got a positive test.”

DM: It will always be the case. The causal link that the media, the CDC made and the COVID tracker, which is the collaboration between the Bloomberg Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Zuckerberg Foundation and others, the official numbers that we get traped across the screens every morning of our computers in our televisions, those numbers are willfully lying. They have been willfully lying since the inception of this. There is not a causal link between these things that have never been established. It has never even been close to established. We have a situation where the illusion of the problem is that people say, “I don’t want to get COVID-19.” What they mean is they don’t want to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not related to each other.

A viral infection hasn’t been documented in the majority of what is called cases. There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That’s the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination, which as you well know when somebody says the word vaccination, the public understanding is that you are being treated with an attenuated or alive virus or a fragment of an attenuated and that the treatment is meant to keep you from getting an infection and it is meant to keep you from transmitting the infection that vaccine in the common definition of a vaccine is meant to do.

The problem is that in the case of Moderna and Pfizer, this is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy. It’s a chemotherapy agent that is gene therapy. It is not a vaccine. What is this doing? It’s sending a strand of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen. It’s a toxin inside of human beings. This is not only not keeping you from getting sick, it’s making your body produce the thing that makes you sick.

HG: In that sense, it does sound like a vaccine?

DM: No, not at all because a vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It’s not supposed to trigger you to make a toxin.

HG: That’s how this differs.

DM: It’s not somewhat different. It’s not the same at all. This is a public manipulation of misrepresentation of clinical treatment. It’s not a vaccination. It’s not a prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.

HG: The way I’ve heard the companies put it is this is to teach your body to fight this virus when it comes around. That’s how they’re presenting it.

DM: Their clinical trial didn’t include any of that as even a possibility within the clinical trial. The clinical trial did not measure the presence or absence of a virus or a virus fragment. The clinical trial did not measure the possibility of transmission suppression, the clinical trial didn’t measure any of those things. This is a case of misrepresentation of technology and it’s done exclusively so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination.

HG: What you’re saying is different from what most of us have heard in the mainstream news and even from the press releases from big companies.

DM: That’s because people aren’t reading the actual clinical trials. If you read the clinical trials, nothing that I’m saying is even remotely different. As a matter of fact, the companies themselves have said what I’m saying. They said, they could not test for the existence or absence of the virus and they could not test for the transmissivity because they said it would be impractical. The companies themselves have admitted to every single thing I’m saying but they are using the public manipulation of the word vaccine to co-opt the public into believing they’re getting a thing, which they are not getting. This is not going to stop you from getting Coronavirus. It’s not going to stop you from getting sick. In fact, on the contrary, it will make you sick far more often than the virus itself.

HG: How can you say that so definitively?

DM: Because the data is nothing but that, for people receiving by the time they got the second shot, 80% of people had one or more clinical presentations of COVID-19, 80% of people who have an infection according to RT-PCR have no symptoms at all.

HG: People are getting it more from the “vaccine?”

DM: Yes. You will get COVID-19 symptoms from getting the gene therapy passed off as a vaccine. You will get COVID symptoms from that 80% of the time. If you’re exposed to SARS-CoV-2 according to RT-PCR, 80% of the time, you will have no symptoms at all.

HG: What is the purpose of getting this vaccine or this gene manipulation as you call it?

DM: It’s a gene therapy technology. That’s Moderna’s own definition. Let’s stick with what they say they are. The benefit is non-existent. A human being is going to be potentially exposed to unclassified, both short-term and long-term risks of altering their RNA and DNA from exposure to this gene therapy. This is important to understand, there is no clinical benefit except that in certain instances of CoV infection and/or COVID-19 exposure, there were a few. By that, I mean less than a few hundred out of nearly 40,000 in the clinical trial. A few hundred people had a few days less severe symptoms with the gene therapy when compared to the other control group. Even in that comparison, if you look at the methodology that’s in the published papers for the clinical trials, they play games with the data because what they’re doing is, they’re separating reactivity, meaning the way in which a person responds to being exposed to the gene therapy, they separate out adverse events from actual COVID symptoms.

The problem is that COVID symptoms include things like fever, body ache, muscle pain, muscle weakness and things like that. They got rid of a lot of what would have been considered to be COVID symptoms by calling them adverse events. If you pull that data out and you say, “Compare the population that got the gene therapy with the population that didn’t get the gene therapy.” The population that got the gene therapy had way more illness, including COVID-19 symptoms, than the population that didn’t get the gene therapy but because they classified an enormous number of things as adverse events, they technically wiggled themselves into what was this ridiculous 90% plus effectiveness. Effectiveness was not effective in blocking illness. It was effective in allegedly shortening the duration of symptoms.

HG: People are afraid that they are ready to believe what they want to believe and holding onto that one bit of information that you shared, that the likelihood with the flu vaccine, “At least it will tamp down my symptoms and limit the duration of my illness.” They held onto that one bit of information that was data manipulation, as you’re saying and they’re holding out hope that this will be their saving grace to help them avoid COVID-19.

DM: Nothing about this will avoid COVID-19 and nothing about this will avoid SARS-CoV-2.

HG: We’ve been talking mostly about the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine that is gene therapy. Is there another one in the works or getting to the market that is not using gene therapy?

DM: The AstraZeneca Oxford trial is using a viral fragment. It is more along the technological lines of what you and I might consider historically, to be a vaccine. The AstraZeneca Oxford trial has been an interesting one to watch because they have a methodology problem that is quite challenging in terms of trying to fool data and understand what’s happening either on the safety or efficacy side. The reason is simple, that in certain instances, the AstraZeneca Oxford trial has not used a saline control group. They’ve used another vaccine as the control. In other words, they’ve stacked the deck. They’re making it look like they are somehow neutral compared to another vaccination in several of their data collection efforts.

As a result of that, we have both a methodology problem, which by the way, has been criticized by a number of clinical scientists. The bigger problem is that they’re still not measuring viral susceptibility and viral transmission. Those are the two legs of the stool that is required for anyone to say that they are vaccinating a population for public health reasons. There is no means by which. This is a simple thing to wrap your head around. If I said, “Everybody needs to take chemotherapy for cancer they might get.”

HG: People would laugh in your face.

DM: That’s exactly what is happening. This is not prophylactic. This is not helping us. We’re being told to take a treatment for a disease we don’t have and most likely will not have. We’re being told that using careful marketing manipulation and propaganda, calling these things vaccines for public health.

HG: Historically vaccines, we’ve taken them for that reason. “I don’t have the measles. I don’t want to get the measles, so I’m going to get this measles shot.” We’ve been primed to accept that approached.

DM: That’s the narrative everybody expects.

HG: Why don’t you expect that though? What’s made you dive deep?

DM: That’s not what’s being measured. That’s not what’s being done and that’s not what this technology is about. mRNA is not a vaccination. It’s a gene therapy that was originally developed for cancer treatment. That’s why I’m using the chemotherapy analogy. This is not a vaccination.

HG: I have colleagues, I’m sure you do too, friends and acquaintances who are going for it. What can we tell these people or share with them that might wake them up?

DM: That’s a complex issue and I have chosen a long time ago to not engage in the energy of this waking sleeping metaphor because the fact of the matter is if people are conditioned to react to fear, this is reflexive and it’s not conscious. If we examine our behavior and what we do is engage in self-harm because we are convinced that somehow or another, there’s a worse future ahead of us, that’s something that I don’t have an ability to say facts are going ever to overcome. I have yet to meet in my life someone who allowed a fact to overwhelm a belief. Once you’ve adopted a belief, facts are not welcome because what they do is, they not only indict your belief but they indict the energy that you hold that says, “I have to believe what I’m told.”

The minute you try to engage with facts, all you do is trigger conflict. What I do is I try to take the complex science and the complex reporting, and I try to make it accessible and easily understood. The goal is that in certain instances, people will go, “I can’t even believe that what he said was true.” The cool thing is you don’t have to believe what I’m saying is true because I don’t value belief. I value the objective reality of facts. It turns out that in this particular case, it is simple and straightforward to say to any person in Moderna’s own SEC filings, they make it abundantly clear that their technology is a gene therapy technology. In their clinical trial, they’ve made it abundantly clear that they could not measure the presence or absence of the virus and they could not measure the presence or the absence of the transmission of the virus. Every single thing that they represented to be doing that preys on the public understanding of what vaccination is, they explicitly said, “They’re not doing that.”

HG: You have been careful to lay out the facts to me and the audience and we’re thankful. I want to ask you on a more personal note, would you even take this PCR test if you had to for travel? I’m getting all kinds of emails and people reaching out to me and I’m not even talking about the vaccine or the gene therapy technology but certain things are being required to participate in life.

DM: I’m actively involved with many of the significant pieces of litigation that are going on to try to unmask the conspiracy that is driving both the PCR, as well as the medical countermeasure interventions. I’m at the vanguard with a few other souls who are fighting for the rights of citizens to make decisions informed by facts, not informed by propaganda. The fact of the matter is the PCR test has never been approved as a diagnostic. It is not diagnostic. There’s nothing about taking a PCR test that does anything other than reinforce a propaganda narrative. It doesn’t tell you anything.

The reason why we’re not doing influenza testing is that we don’t want to admit the fact that the majority of people who are in hospital, who are sick and who are dying are experiencing exactly the same thing that’s happened every year, which is influenza-like, flu-like and pneumonia-like illness. In many cases, when someone has immune compromise or other comorbidities leads to fatalities. It’s a sad reality that that happens but it is part of the human experience that it happens. The fact is that a PCR test is not going to make or not make a confirmed diagnosis of anything because PCR tests cannot confirm a diagnosis.

HG: I’ve interviewed Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andy Kaufman, and they say the same thing. The person who came up with or developed the PCR test says that it’s not to be used to diagnose anything.

DM: So does the FDA so does everybody else. The only reason we are using PCR tests is that governors and the Department of Health and Human Services are maintaining a state of emergency. The second that that state of emergency is lifted in any state or in the country, the PCR test won’t be allowed to be used. We’re maintaining a state of emergency so that manufacturers can keep selling a thing that would never be approved if it was subject to a clinical trial. It goes for what’s being called vaccines too. The gene therapy that Moderna and Pfizer are doing, both of those would be suspended immediately if the state of emergency got lifted. People don’t understand that if you lift the state of emergency, the whole house of cards falls.

HG: That is something else that you and your team are advocating for?

DM: It’s because the emergency use authorization falls with the state of emergency.

HG: Is this one reason, do you think that they have cast aspersions on hydroxychloroquine or any other protocols that could possibly treat the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2?

DM: There’s no question. If you look historically, for many years, Dr. Anthony Fauci at NIAID has held his annual advisory committee meeting. Every year he laments the fact that they’re trying to build this universal influenza vaccine, which he refers to using as an infant in-print vaccine. They’ve been trying to do this for years and it hasn’t worked. This happens to be an opportunity for Anthony Fauci to get what he has not been able to get through legal means, which is he wants to get to a place where he forces a vaccine on a population. He’s manipulating this situation to force a vaccine on a population. The fact of the matter is he forgot that if he’s going to force a vaccine on a population, it should at least be a vaccine.

HG: What would his motives be for that?

DM: Always has been financial. There are billions of dollars at stake and NIAID is essentially the incubator for the pharmaceutical industry. He’s serving the paymasters that have let him manage $191 billion in his career at NIAID.

HG: There are lots to consider here. You’ve given us a lot of food for thought. We want to have another conversation with you again but let’s say I’m an individual that was reading all these facts and I’ve been persuaded. I do not want to get this gene therapy technology. I don’t want even to get the AstraZeneca vaccine. I don’t want to get any of this but I’m under pressure either because of my job or for travel purposes to do so, what would you advise me to do?

DM: I can’t advise a person at all. That’s not my role but what I can tell you is that this is a decision that any human being is going to ultimately have to make based on whether or not they choose to live or they choose to be enslaved. This is like any point in history where you have to make decisions that are based on what is moral and ethical and right with respect to your own sense of responsibility and accountability. The fact of the matter is like wearing a seat belt, like doing a whole bunch of other things, your choice to engage in an activity is ultimately going to be a decision that you have to live with.

I will not touch a thing and I will not allow my body to be invaded with a thing that is been developed in an unethical and illegal way. I am not going to let anybody have the opportunity to manipulate my genetic code. It’s not going to happen. If that means that it comes at a cost of a particular employer or a particular relationship or whatever else, my life happens to be worth more than that. We’ve been conditioned to fall into this trap, which is, “We might not be able to get on a plane.” So, drive.

HG: I thought about that. I’m going to start taking a boat.

DM: I’m not going to let my future and my well-being be enslaved to a commercial interest that is trying to extort or blackmail me into a thing.

HG: That does sound like living. That does sound like freedom as opposed to slavery. I appreciate that. I think that’s what we’re about to hear at the foundation. We want people to live their best lives to take responsibility for their own health and look to ways to nurture it that may not be the most modern or the most profitable for health companies but will be best for them. Let me wrap up by asking you the question I often pose at the end. If the reader could do one thing to improve or sustain their health, what would you recommend that they do?

DM: Pick a lifestyle modification first and foremost and pick it with someone else. Begin exercising, engage in a more wholesome way of engaging with the food you consume. Anything that involves bringing together the sense of wellbeing, which involves fellowship, nutrition, vitality and empowering you to become a person who not only has a conceptual idea of what health is but has a lived experience of it. The more you have the lived experience of health, the less you can be told you’re unwell when you’re perfectly fine.

HG: Thank you so much for your time, David. This has been a great conversation.

DM: You are most welcome. Take care.

Related:

Covid: Scientific Counter-Narratives

Covid scientific counter-narrative links to information provided by front-line doctors and top scientific researchers from universities and other institutions that are suppressed by algorithms at google search and have been censored at Facebook, Twitter, Youtube & LinkedIn.  If it appears any of the links have been scrubbed from the net, copy the link location (control + click with a macbook on any link below) and enter it into the search-bar at https://archive.li/ (where the articles are backed up.) This list is frequently updated. The first three articles are my own, most of the rest (with a few exceptions) are either external links or journalism republished at ronaldthomaswest.com.

When Western Culture Turned to Cannibalism

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part one

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part two

Vaccinated Dropping Dead in Scotland: Official Statistics

Delta Variant in India: No Worse Than a Common Cold

CDC Notice: PCR Test Goes to Trash (see Gates & Soros)

Gates & Soros to Buy Covid Testing Company

Forensic Analysis: 9,000 Vaccine Deaths Should be 45,000

PCR False Positives Big Problem in Australia

USA New Trend: More Deaths From Vaccine Than Covid

UK New Trend: More Cases in Vaccinated Than Unvaccinated

Pfizer Ex-VP: “Fact-Checkers Pack of Lies”

Dr Martin’s Fauci/Covid Criminal Dossier (pdf 205 pages)

PCR Tests Accuracy Debunked (again)

EUA (experimental) Vaccines Violate Nuremberg Ethics 

Canada Fires Another Top Doctor for Raising Questions

Pfizer Manipulated Vaccine Protocols for Children

USA Senator: Suppression of Vaccine Deaths in Media

Politics of Ivermectin in Indonesia

18-39? AstraZeneca Twice as Likely to Kill You as Covid

Fear Mongers vs Delta Variant kills 0.08% of Unvaccinated

Countless Holes in the Official Covid Narrative (the long read)

Lisbon court: 0.9% (152) covid deaths, not the 17,000 claimed (pdf)

1.5 Million Vaccine Injuries, 15,000+ Deaths in EU (1/2 of Europe)

Top Medical Professor Fired for Questioning Vaccinating Children

Inventor of mRNA censored at Youtube for saying “ivermectin”

Moderna mRNA Vaccine Developed Before Covid Outbreak

Asymptomatic Covid Spread Alarm Was False

Science Breakthrough: How Ivermectin Works on Covid

PhD in Immunology censored at Youtube

India Lawsuit Against WHO Chief Scientist (pdf)

India Bar Association Sues WHO Chief Scientist

Corrupt WHO Pushes Back on Ivermectin in India

India Court Over-rules WHO, Allows Ivermectin

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Mexico City

Pfizer’s Own Research Reveals mRNA Vaccine deadly

Suppressing Ivermectin Has Killed 1/2 Million (to May 2021)

John Hopkins Professor: 1/2 of Americans are immune

The Drug That Cracked Covid (pdf file)

CDC Data 12,000% Increase in Deaths With EUA Vaccines

Another 160 Experts Say Stop the Experimental Jabs

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Delhi

How Corruption Suppresses Ivermectin

Paper by 57 Scientists: Stop EUA Vaccinating Now

Bill Gates Protects Big Pharma Profits on Covid Vaccines

More on mRNA Experimental Vaccine

Top Yale University Researcher: Ivermectin Kills Covid

Covid vs Flu: Where is the Grim Reaper’s Scythe in 2020-2021?

Covid: Suppression of Scientific Counter-Narratives

mRNA: “It’s Gene Therapy, Not A Vaccine” David Martin, PhD

We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April by Dr Marty Makary (Johns Hopkins)

Treat Your Own Covid by John Day MD

Beating covid with generic drugs

The Great Barrington Declaration on covid

Fear is the Killer on covid

PCR False Positives (Study: Ten Fatal Flaws)

Propaganda & Corona Virus

*

Covid 19

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

This essay goes to the matter of Kosovo; where the Western states (NATO & the EU) has determined Serbia is not fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Albanians) on their own (Serbian) territory but the now purported (by the West) independent Kosovo is fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Serbs.)

The EU position seems to embrace attitude of ‘never mind the inconvenient fact’ that recent Kosovo ‘leaders’ are being arrested and delivered to international tribunal for crimes against ethnic Serbs (includes organ harvesting), also not to mention what amounts to mere ‘lip service’ (no concrete action or enforcement) concerning the repatriation of 250,000 Serbs driven from Kosovo in an ethnic Albanian engineered cleansing pogrom following the NATO bombing of Serbia.

Insofar as an EU repatriation precedent, Croatia’s ethnic cleansing of Srpska Krajina shows the dishonesty of the EU position; there is no realistic expectation (and never was) by the European Union that the 200,000 Serbs expelled from this (formerly) Serb majority region would be allowed to return to Croatia and their homes. Meanwhile Croatia had been admitted to the European Union.

So, in the context of Serbs are not trustworthy to govern an ethnic minority of Albanians but Albanians are trustworthy to govern a minority of Serbs, the EU de facto embraces (actual outcomes, not political postures) just the sort of ethnic cleansing the NATO bombing was supposed to stop?

NATO ‘just allowed’ another massive pogrom to happen when they’d gained control over Kosovo? Huh. Maybe that Albanian ‘majority’ wasn’t statistically big enough to justify an independent Kosovo (and secure a now ostensibly ‘independent’ Kosovo a ‘right’ to host Camp Bondsteel.)

Now, in this tangled pressures of arbitrary jurisdictions imposed on Serbia by the EU, NATO and the American military occupation of Serbia’s southern-most province of Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel), it should do to breakdown the logistics of the Western democracies dishonest game.

“Camp Bondsteel is the main base of the United States Army under KFOR command in Kosovo. Located near Ferizaj in the eastern part of Kosovo, the base serves as the NATO headquarters for KFOR’s Multinational Battle Group East”

The order is interesting, as well, the nomenclature. The American army figures first (“main base of the United States Army”) ‘under’ (watch how this deceit plays out) KFOR command … serves as NATO’s headquarters for KFOR’s Multinational Battlegroup ..” or in the deciphered military ‘Orwellian-speak’ the American dominated NATO (every NATO “Supreme Allied Commander Europe” has been an American general throughout NATO’s history) keeps a “Battle Group” in Kosovo. This language is entirely inconsistent with ‘peace keeping.’ It is worth noting here, it had been when this occupying force had been 50,000 strong and deployed across Kosovo, Kosovo’s ethnic Albanians were ‘somehow’ allowed to push 250,000 Serbian civilians out of Kosovo in a pogrom that can only be defined as ethnic cleansing in violation of international human rights conventions.

In short other words, the KFOR mission established to bring an end to the fighting, between the Serbian army and the Kosovo Liberation Army, after the Serb army was withdrawn, KFOR clearly took the side of the Kosovo Liberation Army and ‘stood guard’ as the KLA (an insurgent army) was allowed to push 250,000 Serb residents out of homes in their own country, an event the Serb army had prevented prior to NATO establishing control.

Now, the preceding evolving into a NATO ‘authority’ had been extrapolated from UN Resolution 1244 which language is quite inconsistent with the historical reality…

“to resolve the grave humanitarian situation in Kosovo, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and to provide for the safe and free return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes”

…while noting Kosovo is entered into the UN record as territory belonging to Serbia (Yugoslavia being a union of Serbia & Montenegro at this time.)

In short, on the pretext of ‘humanitarian intervention’ via a UN Resolution that NATO had never intended to honor (‘the proof is in the pudding’), an illegal insurgency had been morphed, via geopolitical chicanery, into a rouge ‘state’ governed by KLA war criminals secured by NATO.

“Transcendent Corruption” is the value I have assigned to the parties embracing ‘color of law’ (a veneer of legality masking corruption) wherein law is made to serve the interests of autocrats (e.g. Merkel), plutocrats (e.g. the Clinton & Biden families), & oligarchies (e.g. the European Union) and when taken together amount to rule by the most powerful corporate board personalities (the puppeteers) in the 21st Century model of feudalism manifesting as fascism but is labelled democracy to assuage the peasants (the citizens) sensibilities.

All of this follows on historical facts overlooked by the Western propaganda machine; Eastern Orthodoxy’s majority Serbian population in the region of Srpska Krajina recently (90s Balkan Wars) had been ethnically cleansed from Catholic Croatia by “Operation Storm” (never mind the Serbs have been made the boogeyman for everything that went wrong with the breakup of Yugoslavia), as well the fact unnatural ethnic borders have been enforced in relation to Republik Srpska, ensuring there will be ongoing tensions within Bosnia on the border of Serbia and not least, the remnant Serb majority region in the North of Kosovo is denied their right of self determination to join with Serbia, ensuring perpetual inter-ethnic conflict that serves only to weaken the institutions of state via ongoing radicalization of both populations, Orthodox Christian Serb and Muslim Albanian. And then, we have Metohija or the bona fide historical spiritual center of the Serbian people of the past 1,000 years.

It must be noted that, similar to the Sioux Indians had founded their culture upon a spiritual relationship to the Black Hills of South Dakota from which they had been expelled, Serbia’s relationship to “Old Serbia” (Kosovo) is little different; imperial ambition had seen the Serbs ethnically cleansed by the Albanians on multiple occasions, first under the ‘patronage’ of the Ottoman Turks favoring the Islamic population, then a minority, and after, the Albanians were backed in further pursuing pogroms against Serbs of Kosovo by the fascist Axis powers of World War II (similar to Croatian Ustasha persecution of Serbs during the war) pushing more of the Serb population out, wherein a coup de grace of sorts was delivered by communism under Tito, who forbade ethnic Serbs to return to their homes in Kosovo following 1945. This is a legacy NATO has furthered as ‘enforcers’ of wresting away Kosovo from Serbia. Kosovo is the original “Old Serbia” that continues to hold the center of Serbian cultural identity via the (ongoing) monastic tradition of Orthodoxy in the region of Metohija.

Then, steps into this mess the last people (if they had any sense of shame at all) who should mediate the current tensions, the Germans, Angela Merkel, particularly, and more recently, Ursula von der Leyen, whose family pedigree is a who’s who of empire personalities that cannot help perception in a Serbia whose memories of the NAZI occupation are still sharp.

‘Mediating’ the current controversy where Kosovo’s criminal administration (under the ‘protection’ of NATO) is allowing radical Wahhabism to proselytize the ethnic Albanian population away from the more moderate mainstream of Islam in the cradle of the Orthodox Serb civilization, Europe demanding Serbia recognize and do business with a cabal of criminals couldn’t do a better job of promoting a war of civilizations if it had actually tried; if one were to presume it is mere incompetence derived from ego-narcissism has birthed this circumstance into the present. But maybe it is more than that, a weakened Serbia with artificial borders is ‘low hanging fruit’ with possibility of consolidating control over a region culturally tied to Russia, as well, historically coveted by the Catholic headquarters at Rome.

In the many geopolitical machinations employed by Merkel, von der Leyen, Trump (and now Biden), not to mention the ‘rolling over’ to sound of a dog-whistle by Serbian sell-outs Vucic & Brnabic, there is a canine turd on the table no one dares mention: the Western Christianity’s animus towards Eastern Orthodoxy, particularly Slav Orthodoxy. The smell is in the air.

“…keeping in mind the fact that Bishop Grigorije has a very strong influence among the bishops, the regime has decided to do everything possible to reduce the chances that a man opposed to the government would be elected the new patriarch.

“That is why the confrontation with Grigorije, who has repeatedly said what he thinks about the “golden age of Serbia”, is becoming more and more acute and dangerous. Although the reason for this is his interview given almost a month ago, the fact remains that Grigorije is a threat the regime’s plans on two fronts which is more than enough reason to present this priest from Herzegovina as Serbia’s greatest enemy and a man who “divides the believers”.

“The matrix is always the same – the opponent is first dragged through the mud by the media, with the media, which broadcast on national frequencies, usually discovering “unknown facts”, i.e. false information, about him and his life.

“If this is not enough, they move on to the recording of videos in which “brave”, albeit unknown reporters, question the human characteristics of the victim of persecution, which is also an open invitation to lynch. Those who do not understand this, just think back of how Oliver Ivanović died”

Finally, something a little closer the real reasons behind the invitation to make the assassination manifest:

“…the instigators of the smear campaign against the bishop decided to take advantage of the fact that he does not share the vision of “progressive” Serbia and the Church and thus mark him as a traitor, while creating the impression that it would be a patriotic act to remove [assassinate] such a person” [1]

The lie of the Serbian state (Vucic oligarchy) concerning Bishop Gregorije being in opposition to the church is egregious; the Church position has always been Metohija is, and always will be, Serbia. Insofar as ‘progressive’, the ‘progress’ of the (German controlled) European Union has been little short of demanding an European monoculture derive from the social tensions born of multiculturalism. It is unnatural process, devoid of community spirit, temporally corrupt in the extreme and founded upon geopolitical propaganda lies, as has been the entire business of an independent Kosovo. Post 1945, the Reich is realizing its vision ‘over the long game.’ Recalling Rome’s embrace of Sainthood for the Catholic (Nazi collaborator) Alojzije Stepinac, it is perfectly clarified Slav Orthodoxy has no place in this ‘vision.’

If there were the slightest intention to preserve the integrity of Serb Orthodoxy in the machinations of Western Europe in the Balkans, Vucic would propose, Brnabic would initiate and the European Union would endorse an exclave of Serbian territory in that remaining portion of Metohija that is majority Serb populated. It would have more population than some United Nations states and there is precedence in Azerbaijan’s exclave Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. But, no, this is not on the table, it is intended Slav Orthodoxy will be strangled and made extinct (replaced with ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholicism) in the Balkans.

Populism, and related nationalism, manifest in two forms, the healthy and the unhealthy, the benign and the malignant, the tranquil and the rage. The EU, NATO, and yes, the Church at Rome, all, have a hand in fostering the unhealthy, the malignant, and the rage. The epilogue of this would be the conversion of Serbia to “progressive” European monoculture at the point of a gun.

“There is not the smallest reason for confounding nationalism, which is the desire of a people to be itself, with imperialism, which is the desire of a people to prevent other peoples from being themselves” -Cicily Isabel Fairfield

 

[1] https://archive.li/DrMu2

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

%d bloggers like this: