Archives for category: corruption

Note by this blog author would be, and you can quote me: “I hate Donald Trump. I believe he is a scum-bag in his own right (the Roy Cohn factor) and was altogether too willing to perform political fellatio on the worst of the criminal element in the religious right (the Coe cult ‘mikes’ factor represented in Pence-Pompeo) as well as sucking up to the world-class international criminal actor Bibi Netanyahu. On the other hand, I should say Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are equally evil in their own right. This re-posted article captures the reasons why, never-mind Trump himself, I DO NOT despise Trump supporters, not that I love them all, and most certainly I do not admire the vast majority of Biden/Harris supporters whose civics education (constitutional ethics) seems to have somehow gone missing at best, or have been discarded as ‘inconvenient’ at worst. Many of the conservative but snookered voters are law abiding and principled people, as well, many of the liberal voters in denial are not.”


NOTE FROM GLENN GREENWALD: On Friday, a relatively obscure Twitter user with fewer than 7,000 followers — posting under the pseudonym MartyrMade — posted one of the most mega-viral threads of the year. Over the course of thirty-five tweets, the writer, a podcast host whose real name is Darryl Cooper, set out to explain the mindset that has led so many Trump supporters to believe that the 2020 election was fraudulent and, more generally, to lose faith and trust in most U.S. institutions of authority.

Numerous journalists, including me, promoted the thread as one of the most insightful analyses yet published explaining the animating convictions underlying the MAGA movement. That night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson devoted a seven-minute segment to doing nothing more than reading Cooper’s thread. At the CPAC conference on Sunday, former President Donald Trump explicitly recommended the thread using Cooper’s name. In the last four days, Cooper’s Twitter account has gained more than 70,000 followers. Clearly, this thread resonated strongly with that political faction as a true and important explanation of how many MAGA voters have come to understand the world.

For our Outside Voices freelance section, we asked Cooper to elaborate on his influential thread, with a focus on what led him to these observations about prevailing MAGA sentiments and why he believes they are important for people to understand. As Cooper notes, he does not share all of the perceptions and beliefs he is conveying, although he shares many of them. Instead, based on the recognition that most media outlets are incapable of understanding let alone accurately describing the views of a group of people they view with little more than unmitigated contempt, condescension and scorn, he believes it is imperative that people understand the actual reality of what is motivating so many Trump voters in their views, perception and beliefs — regardless of whether each particular belief is accurate or not.

We also believe this understanding is vital, which is why we are happy to publish Cooper’s essay. It should go without saying that, as it true of all of our articles published on Outside Voices — which we treat as an op-ed page — our publishing of this article does not signify agreement with all of its claims, but only our belief that it is a viewpoint worth airing.

By Darryl Cooper

I quit Twitter last August. Quit for good. Other than posting links to two new episodes of my podcast, I stayed away for eight months and didn’t regret a thing. Around mid-June I let myself be persuaded that social media engagement was part of having a podcast, so I dipped back in, promising myself I’d avoid being pulled into politics. Things haven’t gone as planned.

The temptation was disguised cleverly as a conversation with a friend’s mother. She was visiting from upstate New York and we got to talking while my buddy was in the house tending to my goddaughter. She’s a hardcore Trumper from a less cynical generation that believes what she hears from sources she trusts. She’d been hounding her son about the stolen election all week, and he’d been trying to disabuse her of various theories involving trucked-in ballots and hacked counting machines. Now she had me cornered and put the question to me: “Do YOU think the election was legit?” So I told her the truth: I don’t know.

By the time my friend had put the baby to bed and rejoined us, we were waist-deep in a discussion about what happened last year, and she was satisfied that I was on her side. “See?!? He (she meant me) knows what’s going on! I’m not crazy. He’s smart, and HE knows!” My friend pulled the Captain Picard facepalm, and said, “Darryl, what the f*ck are you telling her?”

What I told her was some version of the Twitter thread Tucker Carlson read on air Friday night and which President Trump, using my name, then explicitly promoted in his speech to CPAC on Sunday, which has blown my inbox, and my promise to stay away from politics, to smithereens.

I told her I didn’t know much about the ballots, or the voting machines, or some company that she’d heard had ties to Venezuela. I didn’t follow Sidney Powell, or Lin Wood, or the details of the cases proceeding through the system. I think it was around the time Rudy Giuliani chose a landscape & gardening emporium as the location for a press conference on what would have been the greatest political scandal in American history that I made the conscious decision to stop paying attention. Or maybe it was the dripping hair dye, or something about a kraken — it’s all sort of blended together these days.

But I felt for her. She wasn’t the first person with whom I’d had the discussion, and I felt for all of them. I’ve had the discussion often enough that I feel comfortable extracting a general theory about where these people are coming from.


Like my friend’s mother, most of them believe some or all of the theories involving fraudulent ballots, voting machines, and the rest. Scratch the surface and you’ll find that they’re not particularly attached to any one of them. The specific theories were almost a kind of synecdoche, a concrete symbol representing a deeply felt, but difficult to describe, sense that whatever happened in 2020, it was not a meaningfully democratic presidential election. The counting delays, the last-minute changes to election procedures, the unprecedented coordinated censorship campaign by Big Tech in defense of Biden were all understood as the culmination of the pan-institutional anti-Trump campaign they’d watched unfold for over four years.

Many of them deny it now, but a lot of 2016 Trump voters were worried during the early stages of the Russia collusion investigation. True, the evidence seemed thin, and the very idea that the US & allied security apparatus would allow Trump to take office if they really thought he might be under Russian blackmail seemed a bit preposterous on its face. But to many conservatives in 2016 and early 2017, it seemed equally preposterous that the institutions they trusted, and even the ones they didn’t, would go all-in on a story if there wasn’t at least something to it. Imagine the consequences for these institutions if it turned out there was nothing to it.

We now know that the FBI and other intelligence agencies conducted covert surveillance against members of the Trump campaign based on evidence manufactured by political operatives working for the Clinton campaign, both before and after the election. We know that those involved with the investigation knew the accusations of collusion were part of a campaign “approved by Hillary Clinton… to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.” They might have expected such behavior from the Clintons — politics is a violent game and Hillary’s got a lot of scalps on her wall. But many of the people watching this happen were Tea Party types, in spirit if not in actual fact. They give their kids a pocket Constitution for their birthday. They have Yellow Ribbon bumper stickers, and fly the POW/MIA flag under the front-porch Stars and Stripes, and curl their lip at people who talk during the National Anthem at ballgames. They’re the people who believed their institutions when they were told Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. To them, the intel community using fake evidence (including falsified documents) to spy on a presidential campaign is a big deal.

It may surprise many liberals, but most conservative normies actually know the Russia collusion case front and back. A whole ecosystem sprouted up to pore over every new development, and conservatives followed the details as avidly as any follower of liberal conspiracy theorists Seth Abramson or Marcy Wheeler. When the world learned of the infamous meeting between Trump campaign officials and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, it seemed like a problem and many Trump supporters took it seriously. Deep down, even those who rejected the possibility of open collusion worried that one of Trump’s inexperienced family members, or else a sketchy operative glomming onto the campaign, might have done something that, whatever its real gravity, could be successfully framed in a manner to sway a dozen of John McCain’s friends in the Senate.

Then, Trump supporters learned that Veselnitskaya was working with Fusion GPS, the political research and PR firm used by the Clinton campaign to formulate and spread the collusion accusations. They learned that the anti-Clinton information that was supposed to be the subject of the notorious meeting was provided by the same firm. They learned that she’d had dinner with Glenn Simpson, the owner of Fusion GPS, both the day before, and the day after the meeting. Needless to say, Trump supporters were skeptical of Simpson’s claim that Veselnitskaya’s meeting with Trump campaign officials never came up during either of their dinner dates, given that the content of the meeting was alleged to be the very treasonous, impeachable crime his firm was being paid to investigate and publicize.

There’s no need to relive all the details of the Russia collusion scam. The point is that conservatives were following it all very closely, in real time, and they noticed when things didn’t add up. After James Comey told Fox News’ Bret Baier that, even at the time of their interview in April 2018, he didn’t know who had funded the Steele dossier, conservatives noticed when the December 2019 DOJ Inspector General’s report showed that he had been informed of the dossier’s provenance in October 2016. And they asked themselves: Why would he lie? Lying to investigators about one’s knowledge of or involvement in a potentially criminal act is often taken as consciousness of guilt.

This was the bone that stuck in conservatives’ craw throughout the two years of hysteria over Russia. Why would Comey lie about knowing where the dossier came from? Why would the people involved claim to have seen evidence that never seemed to materialize? If the point of the Special Counsel is to take the investigation out of the hands of line investigators to avoid the appearance of political influence, why staff the office with known partisans and the same FBI personnel who originated and oversaw the case? Why was the relationship between Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya and Fusion GPS being dismissed as irrelevant? Why were people who must know better continuing to insist that the Steele dossier was originally funded by Republicans long after the claim had been debunked? Why wasn’t the media asking even these most obvious questions? And why were they giving themselves awards for refusing to ask those questions, and viciously attacking journalists who did ask them? These journalists are intelligent people — at least they present that way on television. Is it possible that these questions simply had not occurred to them? It seemed unlikely.

Many Trump supporters reasoned that it was simply not possible to carry on this campaign without some degree of coordination. That coordination perhaps did not take place in smoke-filled rooms (though they weren’t ruling it out), but at least through incentives, pressure, and vague but certain threats all well-understood by people who moved about in the same professional and social class, and who complained that they could “smell the Trump support” when they were unfortunate enough to have to patronize a Wal-Mart.

If there was a time when Trump supporters feared Robert Mueller’s goon squad, that time had passed by the 2018 midterm elections. Conservatives knew by then the whole case was bunk, and they were salivating at the prospect of watching him get chopped up by the likes of Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes. And he did.

The collusion case wasn’t only used to damage Trump in the polls or distract from his political agenda. It was used as an open threat to keep people from working in the administration. Taking a job in the Trump administration meant having one’s entire life investigated for anything that could fill CNN’s anti-Trump content requirement for another few days, whether or not it held up to scrutiny. Many administration employees quit because they were being bankrupted by legal fees due to an investigation that was known by its progenitors to be a political operation. The Department of Justice, press, and government used falsehoods to destroy lives and actively subvert an elected administration almost from the start. Perhaps worst of all, some portion of the American population was driven to the edge of madness by two years of being told that American politics had become a real-life version of The Manchurian Candidate. And not by Alex Jones, but by intelligence chiefs and politicians, amplified by media organizations which threw every ounce of their accumulated credibility behind the insanity.

For two years, Trump supporters had been called traitors and Russian bots for casting ballots for “Vladimir Putin’s c*ck holster.” They’d been subjected to a two-year gaslighting campaign by politicians, government agencies, and elite media. It took real fortitude to stand up to the unanimous mockery and scorn of these powerful institutions. But those institutions had gambled their power and credibility, and they’d lost, and now Trump supporters expected a reckoning. When no reckoning was forthcoming – when the Greenwalds, and Taibbis, and Matés of the world were not handed the New York Times’ revoked Pulitzers for correctly and courageously standing against the tsunami on the biggest political story in years – these people shed many illusions about how power really operates in their country.

Trump supporters know – I think everyone knows – that Donald Trump would have been impeached and probably indicted if Robert Mueller had proven that he’d paid a foreign spy to gather damaging information on Hillary Clinton from sources connected to Russian intelligence and disseminate that information in the press. Many of Trump’s own supporters wouldn’t have objected to his removal if that had happened. Of course that is exactly what the Clinton campaign actually did, yet there were no consequences for it. Indeed, there has been almost no criticism of it.

Trump supporters had gone from worrying the collusion might be real, to suspecting it might be fake, to seeing proof that it was all a scam. Then they watched as every institution – government agencies, the press, Congressional committees, academia – blew right past it and gaslit them for another year. To this day, something like half the country still believes that Trump was caught red-handed engaging in treason with Russia, and only escaped a public hanging because of a DOJ technicality regarding the indictment of sitting presidents. Most galling, conservatives suspect that within a few decades liberals will use their command over the culture to ensure that virtually everyone believes it. This is where people whose political identities have for decades been largely defined by a naive belief in what they learned in civics class began to see the outline of a Regime that crossed not only partisan, but all institutional boundaries. They’d been taught that America didn’t have Regimes, but what else was this thing they’d seen step out from the shadows to unite against their interloper president?


GOP propaganda still has many conservatives thinking in terms of partisan binaries. Even the dreaded RINO (Republican-In-Name-Only) slur serves the purposes of the party, because it implies that the Democrats represent an irreconcilable opposition. But many Trump supporters see clearly that the Regime is not partisan. They know that the same institutions would have taken opposite sides if it had been a Tulsi Gabbard vs. Jeb Bush election. It’s hard to describe to people on the Left, who are used to thinking of American government as a conspiracy and are weaned on stories about Watergate, COINTELPRO, and Saddam’s WMD, how shocking and disillusioning this was for people who encouraged their sons and daughters to go fight for their country when George W. Bush declared war on Iraq.

They could have managed the shock if it only involved the government. But the behavior of the press is what radicalized them. Trump supporters have more contempt for journalists than they have for any politician or government official, because they feel most betrayed by them. The idea that the corporate press is driven by ratings and sensationalism has become untenable over the last several years. If that were true, there’d be a microphone in the face of every executive branch official demanding to know what the former Secretary of Labor meant when he said that Jeffrey Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime these people are now seeing in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period.

This is profoundly disorienting. Again, we’re not talking about pre-2016 Greenwald readers or even Ron Paul libertarians, who swallowed half a bottle of red pills long ago. These are people who attacked Edward Snowden for “betraying his country,” and who only now are beginning to see that they might have been wrong. It’s not because the parties have been reversed, and it’s not because they’re bitter over losing. They just didn’t know. If any country is going to function over the long-term, not everyone can be a revolutionary. Most people have to believe what they’re told and go with the flow most of the time. These were those people. I’m pretty conservative by temperament, but most of my political friends are on the Left. I spend a good deal of our conversations simply trying to convince them that these people are not demons, and that this political moment is pregnant with opportunity.

Many Trump supporters don’t know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know with apodictic certainty that the press, the FBI, and even the courts would lie to them if they were. They have every reason to believe that, and it’s probably true. They watched the corporate press behave like animals for four years. Tens of millions of people will always see Brett Kavanaugh as a gang rapist, based on an unproven accusation, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of that. They helped lead a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered on the most deadly and destructive riots in decades.

Conservatives have always complained that the media had a liberal bias. Fine, whatever: they still thought the press would admit the truth if they were cornered. They don’t believe that anymore. What they’ve witnessed in recent years has shown them that the corporate press will say anything, do anything, to achieve a political objective, or simply to ruin someone they perceive as an opponent. Since my casual Twitter thread ended up in the mouths of Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump, I’ve received hundreds of messages from people saying that I should prepare to be targeted. Others don’t think that will happen, but even most of them don’t think it’s an irrational concern. We’ve seen an elderly lady receive physical threats after a CNN reporter accosted her at home to accuse her of aiding Kremlin disinformation ops. We’ve seen them threaten to dox someone for making a humorous meme.

Throughout 2020, the corporate press used its platform to excuse and encourage political violence. Time Magazine told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly conference calls involving – among others – leaders of the protests, local officials responsible for managing them, and members of the media charged with reporting on the events. They worked together with Silicon Valley to control the messaging about the ongoing crisis for maximum political effect. In case of a Trump victory, the same organization had protesters ready to be activated by text message in 400 cities the day after the election. Every town with a population over 50,000 would have been in for some pre-planned, centrally-controlled mayhem. In other countries we call that a color revolution.

Throughout the summer, establishment governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures, often over the protests of the state legislatures. It wasn’t only the mass mailing of live ballots: they also lowered signature matching standards, axed existing voter ID and notarization requirements, and more. Many people reading this might think those were necessary changes, either due to the virus or to prevent potential voter suppression. I won’t argue the point, but the fact is that the US Constitution states plainly that “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections… shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” As far as conservatives were concerned, state governors used COVID to unconstitutionally usurp their legislatures’ authority to unilaterally alter voting procedures just months before an election in order to help Biden make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system. Lawyers can argue over the legitimacy of the procedural modifications; the point is that conservatives believe in their bones – and I think they’re probably right – that the cases would have been treated differently, in both the media and in court, if the parties were reversed.

And then came the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. Liberals dismiss the incident because, after four years of obsessing over the activities of the Trump children, they insist they’re not interested in the behavior of the candidate’s family members. But this misses the point entirely. Big Tech ran a coordinated censorship campaign against a major American newspaper while the rest of the media spread base propaganda to protect a political candidate. And once again, the campaign crossed institutional boundaries, with dozens of former intelligence officials throwing their weight behind the baseless and now-discredited claim that the laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign. That lie was promoted by Big Tech companies, while the true information being reported by The New York Post about the laptop’s contents was suppressed. That is what happened.

Even the tech companies themselves now admit it was a “mistake” – Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said it was an error and apologized – but the election is over, Joe Biden has appointed Facebook’s government regulations executive as his ethics arbiter, so who cares, right? It hardly needs saying that if The New York Times had Donald Trump Jr.’s laptop, full of pictures of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama, and emails with pretty direct discussions of political corruption, the Paper of Record would not have had its accounts suspended for reporting on it. Let’s remember that stories of Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact across the media spectrum and used as the basis for a multi-year criminal investigation, when the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its primary source.

The reaction of Trump supporters to all this was not, “no fair!” That was how they felt about Romney’s “binders of women” in 2012 or Harry Reid’s lie that Romney paid no federal taxes. This is different. Now they were beginning to see, accurately, that the institutions of their country — all of them — had been captured by people prepared to use any means to exclude them from the political process. And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. Trump got 13 million more votes than in 2016 – 10 million more than Hillary Clinton had gotten.

As election day became election night and the tallies rolled in, Trump supporters allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark around midnight, they knew.

Over the following weeks, they were shuffled around between honest critics, online grifters, and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories. They latched onto one then another increasingly outlandish theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real, of which election day was only the culmination. Media and Big Tech did all they could to make things worse. Everything about the election was strange, confusing, and unprecedented – the changes to procedure, unprecedented mail-in voting, counting delays, etc – but rather than admit that and bring everything into the open, they banned discussion of it (even in private messages!), and launched an absurd propaganda campaign telling us that it was – I’m not making this up – the most well-run and secure election in American history.

Conservatives know – again, I think probably everyone knows – that just as Don Jr.’s laptop would have been the story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would have been taken very seriously. See 2016 for proof.

Even the judiciary had forfeited its credibility with these voters because of the opposition’s embrace of political violence. Trump supporters say, with good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he’ll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house? Maybe most judges would do their jobs, but given the events of the last four years it’s not an unreasonable concern, and the concern itself is enough to cast the whole system in doubt. Again, we know, thanks to Time Magazine, that riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump had won. Sure, they were “protests”, but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. The Chamber of Commerce took the threat of a second round of destruction of its members’ property seriously enough to offer its assistance to the “well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information” – Time’s words, not mine.

Trump voters were adamant that the governors’ changes to election procedures were unconstitutional. Everything in law is open to interpretation, but it doesn’t require a Harvard Law degree to read Article 1, Section 4 (quoted above) and come to that conclusion. But they also knew the cases wouldn’t see a courtroom until after the election, and what judge was going to make a ruling that would be framed as a judicial coup d’etat just because some governors didn’t go through the proper channels? Even a judge willing to accept the personal risk would have also to be willing to inflict the chaos that would follow on the country. Even a well-intentioned judge could convince himself that, whatever happened or didn’t happen, as a public servant he had no right to impose an opinion guaranteed to lead to mass violence – because the threat was not implied, it was direct. Some Trump supporters, unfortunately, thought the license for political violence applied to everyone; the hundreds of them now sitting in federal jails learned the hard way that it wasn’t true.

From the perspective of Trump’s supporters, the entrenched bureaucracy and security state subverted their populist president from day one. The natural guardrails of the Fourth Estate were removed because the press was part of the operation. Election rules were changed in an unconstitutional manner that could only be challenged after the deed was done, when judges and officials would be playing chicken with a direct threat of burning cities. Political violence was legitimized and encouraged. Major newspapers and sitting presidents were banned from social media, while the opposition enjoyed free rein to promote stories that were discredited once it was too late to matter. Conservatives put these things together and concluded that, whatever happened on November 3, 2020, it was not a free and fair democratic election in any sense that would have had meaning before Donald J. Trump was a candidate.

Trump supporters were led down some rabbit holes. But they are absolutely right that the institutions and power centers of this country have been monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to prevent them getting it. I encourage people on the Left to recognize the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity in front of them. You’re not going to agree with the conservatives on everything. But if in 2004 I had told you that the majority of the GOP voter base would soon be seeing the folly of the Iraq War, becoming skeptical of state surveillance, and beginning to see the need for action to help the poor and working classes, you’d have told me such a thing would transform the country. Take the opportunity. These people are not demons, and they are ready to listen in a way they haven’t in a long, long time.

Darryl Cooper is the host of The MartyrMade Podcast, Co-host of The Unraveling w/Jocko Willink, and author of “that” Twitter thread.

Read in English

Nakon dve godine sedenja na pismima Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, došlo je vreme za delovanje; s obzirom na to da je nemački ambasador u Srbiji u aprilu 2021. godine izneo neke primedbe, koje je primetio zapadni korporativni medijski front:

^ Fond braće Rokfeler dodeljuje kancelariji Balkanske mreže za istraživačko izveštavanje [BIRN] u Prištini, u proseku 100.000 USD godišnje, što je samo jedan od izvora sredstava koji BIRN prikuplja iz zapadnih korporativnih velikaša [1]

Dakle, šta je nemački ambasadorski glupan imao da kaže? Uprkos tome što nije bilo zakonskog ovlašćenja Ujedinjenih nacija za NATO bombardovanje Srbije, odluka o bombardovanju Srbije…

je morala biti doneta da bi se sprečila humanitarna katastrofa“ [2]

… ha. Ne pominje se nedavno spremanje kosovskih lidera na suđenja za ratne zločine? Oh, a šta je sa onim „ljudima“ iz BND (nemačka CIA) koji koriste Konrad Adenauer Siftung kao paravan za obuku i postavljanje neonacističkih fašista u Ukrajini? Da li ste se ikad zapitali šta bi mogli da rade u Beogradu? [3], [4]

Ne moramo putovati kroz vreme, u rane i srednje 1940-e, da bismo razumeli da „Deutschland über Alles“ u očima određenih susednih zemalja Nemačke treba gledati malo drugačije nego što bi većina današnjih običnih nemačkih smrtnika mogla pomisliti. Ali, nemački ambasador u Srbiji, Tomas Šib, nije običan nemački smrtnik, on predsedava lokacijom čiji je centar nemačkog BND (koji potiče od organizacije Gelen) u Beogradu.

U međuvremenu, pogledajmo pismo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda (prvobitni demanti) u vezi sa nekim vrlo gadnim postupcima nemačke države; to je „pranje“ ratnog zločina pod lažnom zastavom, koji je rezultirao smrću više od 1000 sirijskih civila (nastavite da čitate, predstavljeni su svi potrebni konteksti i dokazi).

Obratite pažnju na datume pisma; Međunarodni krivični sud (dalje u tekstu: ICC) je 4. jula 2018. primio žalbu, 6. februara 2019. je datum kada je ICC porekao da ima nadležnost za istragu. Ovo nije bio brz odgovor, sedam meseci ukazuje, ako ne na samoanalizu, onda barem na neko prilično vreme u razmišljanju o neophodnom okolišenju kako da se izbegne suočavanje sa izobiljem informacija iznetih pred sud. Osporio sam ovo poricanje komunikacijom (objavljenom onlajn) koja ukazuje na istoriju ICC, podložnoj neprikladnim uticajima i zahtevom da se oni preispitaju. [5]

Prvo pismo je generičko poricanje, drugo pismo je uvijeno, kako bi se objasnilo da sud smatra da su neki „ozbiljni navodi“ izvan njegovog dometa istrage:

Kada je sam Međunarodni krivični sud [ICC] saučesnik u prikrivanju ratnih zločina od strane nemačkih državnih aktera u 21. veku, svi na vrhu bi trebalo ponešto da objasne. Ukratko, ono što sledi je da postoji mnoštvo dokaza prima facie [latinski izraz: „na prvi pogled“] da je nemačka obaveštajna služba „pomagala i podržavala“ [asistirala] u prikrivanju pod lažnom zastavom hemijske napade u Siriji, uključujući i zloglasni (posebno ubilački) gasni napad sarinom na Gutu, Sirija, u avgustu 2013. godine. Ove informacije su dostavljene nemačkim parlamentarcima, kao i Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu. Nemci su ćutali, a Međunarodni krivični sud protestuje i izjavljuje da nije nadležan, prema drugom pismu:

„Tužilaštvo je pažljivo ispitalo vašu poslednju komunikaciju. Sa žaljenjem Vas obaveštavam da je tužilac potvrdio da komunikacija ne donosi nove činjenice ili dokaze koji bi promenili prethodnu odluku da ne postoji osnova za postupanje po Rimskom statutu. Prema Rimskom statutu, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo nad genocidom, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima, kako je definisano u Rimskom statutu (Članovi 6 do 8), ako su počinjeni 1. jula 2002. godine ili kasnije (Član 11). Pored toga, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo za takva krivična dela počinjena na teritoriji države koja je prihvatila nadležnost Suda ili od strane državljanina te države (Član 12), ili kada Savet bezbednosti upućuje situaciju na Sud (Član 13). U svetlu ovih zahteva, čini se da se Vaša komunikacija, nakon pažljivog preispitivanja, i dalje odnosi na pitanja van nadležnosti Suda.

„Nadam se da ćete uvažiti da su definisanom jurisdikcijom Suda mnogi ozbiljni navodi izvan dosega ove institucije. Zahvalni smo na vašem stalnom interesovanju za Međunarodni krivični sud.“

ICC očigledno nije u pravu. I kukavički je i korumpiran. Nemačka je potpisnica ICC-a, a krivično delo pomaganja i podržavanja (prikrivanje pod lažnom zastavom) nesumnjivo ima svoje polazište u nemačkoj državi. ICC, da bi izbegao ovo (uprkos priznanju „ozbiljnih navoda“), čini se da usko definiše nadležnost (ograničavajući primenljive optužbe) za zločin počinjen u Siriji (i na taj način izbegava optužbu za pomaganje i podržavanje) i zbog toga radije negira nadležnost nego da uzburka obaveštajnu službu Nemačke (Bundesnachrichtendienst ili BND) i mezimce Angele Merkel.

Pitanje koje se postavlja u filozofiji prava je, da li sam ICC postaje saučesnik u pomaganju i podržavanju [asistiranju] navodnom prikrivanju operacije pod lažnom zastavom, očigledno namernim „uskim“ čitanjem međunarodnog prava i očigledno kukavičkim izbegavanjem da istraže krupan ratni zločin? Čini mi se, da:

Ghouta_August_2013 - 1

Evo same žalbe, praćene mojom komunikacijom sa ICC-om koja je dovela do podnošenja prve žalbe:

Poštovano tužilaštvo pri Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu

Hvala vam na pozivu da formalizujem moju žalbu u vezi sa zločinom gasnog napada sarinom na Gutu, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.


Prema običajnom međunarodnom pravu, pomaganje i podržavanje ratnih zločina uključuje tri elementa:

(1) Glavno lice ili entitet počinio je ratni zločin;

(2) Drugi akter počinio je delo koje je imalo značajan efekat na izvršenje osnovnog dela; i

(3) Potrebno mentalno stanje: Drugi akter je znao da će takvo delo pomoći ili je postojala značajna verovatnoća da će pomoći izvršenju osnovnog dela.


1) Turska, država pripadnica NATO-a, preko svoje obaveštajne agencije MIT, urotila se sa al-Kaidom (predloženom tajnom članicom NATO-a) da počini ratni zločin, to jest (lažna zastava) gasni napad i usmrćivanje više od hiljadu civila u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.

2) Službenici NATO aktera Nemačke, potpisnice Rimskog statuta, pružili su „pokriće“ propagandom i drugim, srodnim sredstvima (npr. „pranje“ lažnih informacija medijima putem parlamentarnog nadzora) omogućavajući stvarnim počiniocima da pobegnu kontroli, iako su nemački obaveštajci znali:

3) Takva radnja (prethodno pomenuta) u velikoj meri bi pomogla izvršenju navedenog zločina ili drugim rečima, omogućila nekažnjivost lažnih zastava.


Članovi 49/50/129/146 četiri Ženevske konvencije (1949) nalažu državama članicama da kazneno gone i kazne sva „lica“ koja čine teška kršenja (Ambos [2014] 146). Shodno tome, Elementi zločina Statuta ICC-a ne sadrže izričitu napomenu za kategoriju počinilaca, jer tokom pregovora na Rimskoj konferenciji nije bilo neslaganja da ratne zločine mogu počiniti i pripadnici oružanih snaga i civili (Dorman, Elementi ratnih zločina [2003] 391).


Prelazeći na neposredno prethodni (III), ovaj podnosilac predstavke Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu (Ronald Tomas Vest) drži da je osobama u bilo kojoj vladi, potpisnici Rimskog statuta, zabranjeno da pomažu i podržavaju ratni zločin ili zločin protiv čovečnosti bez obzira na zločin van nadležnosti sudova (država koja nije potpisnica) kada je pomaganje i podržavanje izvršeno u nadležnosti sudova (država potpisnica). To bi uključivalo zaposlene u obaveštajnim agencijama zapadnih demokratija i političare iz njihovih redova, koji pružaju pokriće počiniocima ratnih zločina i zločina protiv čovečnosti .

Imenovana lica nemačke savezne službe bezbednosti i odgovorni političari (Bundesnachrichtendienst) koji su proaktivno (pružali lažne informacije) ili pasivno (dozvoljavali lažne podatke) namerno pomagali i podržavali stvarne počinioce (turski MIT u partnerstvu sa al-Kaidom) (pod lažnom zastavom) gasni napad na Gutu, u Siriji u avgustu 2013. godine uključuje (ali nije ograničen na) bivšeg predsednika BND Gerharda Šindlera, sadašnjeg predsednika BND Bruna Kala, Helge Brauna (ministra nadzora) i Angelu Merkel.

Imenovane osobe koje rukovode nemačkom kancelarijom saveznog tužioca, (Generalbundesanwalt/Generalbundesanwältin) a koje nisu izvršile istraživanje i procesuiranje na domaćem i međunarodnom planu (univerzalna nadležnost za ratne zločine ili Völkerstrafgesetzbuch) su Harald Range i Peter Frank.

Imenovani nemački parlamentarci (rukovodstvo i/ili stariji članovi) koji poseduju (barem od decembra 2015. godine) oslobađajuće dokaze koji oslobađaju predsednika Bašara al Asada i njegove zvaničnike i vojsku zbog napada sarinom u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine i nisu preduzeli odgovarajuće mere da nemačku obaveštajnu službu i/ili nemačke političke aktere pokore utvrđenim činjenicama prema međunarodnom pravu i, shodno tome, zaštitili su NATO aktera i njihove partnere u al-Kaidi od svetlosti, kao što su stvarni počinioci (ali ne ograničeno na) Hans-Kristijan Stroebele, Ula Jelpke, Irene Mihalic, Mihael Hartman, Armin Šuster, Norbert Lamert, Peter Hince, Johanes Singhamer, Edelgard Bulman, Ursula Šmit, Petra Pau, Klaudija Rot, Marieluise Bek, Omid Nuripur, Stefan Libih, Nils Anen, Roderih Kizeveter i Gregor Gisi.


Da bi kontekstualizovali dugu naviku zapadnih obaveštajnih agencija koje sponzorišu i/ili pomažu i podržavaju terorizam lažne zastave, preporučuje se tužilac ICC-a da pregleda istoriju GLADIO-a:

i prelazimo u sadašnje vreme sa GLADIO B:

Radi šireg razumevanja osnovne ili utemeljujuće kriminalne prirode / porekla nemačkog Bundesnachrichtendienst-a, preporučuje se da tužilac ICC-a pregleda poreklo i istoriju BND-a iz organizacije Gelen:

Da bi se razumelo da nemački zvaničnici koji su trenutno na vlasti i dalje igraju podmuklo u sadašnjoj geopolitičkoj eri, daju se sledeće informacije:

Kontekstualizujući odnos obaveštajnih agencija država NATO-a (uključujući Nemačku, potpisnicu Rimskog statuta) prema hemijskim zločinima al-Kaide u Siriji, preporučuje se tužiocu ICC-a da ispita novinarstvo Vanese Belei u vezi s takozvanim Belim šlemovima:

Podržavajući izjavu turskog poslanika Erena Erdema da su „pobunjeničke“ (al-Kaida) hemikalije dopremljene iz Evrope, je ruska vojna obaveštajna služba:


Zapadne obaveštajne agencije imaju dugu istoriju nepoštene igre (kriminalne aktivnosti). U slučaju da je nemačka BND pomagala i podržavala Al-Kaidu u Siriji, postoje snažni dokazi prima facie o namernom „pranju“ lažnih informacija putem obaveštajnih podataka Saveznog nemačkog parlamenta (Bundestag) nadzorni odbor za medije koji izvršavaju prikrivanje (prikrivanje stvarnih počinilaca) ratnog zločina koji uključuje gas sarin, prema originalnim informacijama dostavljenim ICC-u sa izmenama i dopunama:

Eren_Erdem - 1

Šta se može znati naspram onoga što će se znati

Verovatno je samo pitanje vremena kada će CIA urednici na Vikipediji promeniti nedavno ažurirane informacije u gorenavedenom (kropovanom uvećanom screenshot-u) Vikipedijinom članku poslednji put ažuriranom 4. aprila 2018:

„Erdem takođe tvrdi da je sarin-gas transportovan kroz Tursku u Siriju, kasnije korišćen u hemijskom napadu na Gutu 2013. godine,kao i kasniji napadi ISIL-a na civile. Erdem je pred parlamentom pokazao slučaj gde su vođene istrage koje su dovele do hapšenja 13 potencijalnih turskih pripadnika ISIL-a, ali se kasnije neobjašnjivo od njih odustalo.

„Erdem se u Turskoj suočava sa optužbama za izdaju zbog svojih objava.

Šta je zvanično izjavio turski član parlamenta Eren Erdem? Govoreći o kopiji (koju ima u svom posedu) krivičnog predmeta tužioca Adane 2013/120, koji su poništili Erdoganovi ljudi:

„U ovoj optužnici postoje podaci. Materijali za hemijsko oružje dovoze se u Tursku i sastavljaju u Siriji u logorima ISIS-a koji je u to vreme bio poznat kao iračka Al Kaida.

Sve ovo je otkriveno. Postoje snimci telefonskih razgovora o ovom transportovanju, poput „ne brinite o granici, mi ćemo se pobrinuti za to“, a takođe vidimo i da se koristi birokratija.

U vezi sa pošiljkom, republički tužilac u Adani, Mehmet Arıkan, izveo je operaciju i ljudi koji su umešani su zadržani. Ali, koliko razumem, on nije bio uticajna osoba u birokratiji. Nedelju dana nakon toga, imenovan je još jedan javni tužilac, preuzeo je optužnicu i svi pritvorenici su pušteni. I napustili su Tursku prelazeći sirijsku granicu.

Snimci telefonskih razgovora u optužnici pokazali su sve detalje, od načina na koji će pošiljka prevesti do toga kako će biti pripremljena, od sadržaja laboratorija do izvora materijala. Koji kamioni će se koristiti, svi datumi itd. Od A do Ž, o svemu se razgovaralo i snimalo. Uprkos svim ovim dokazima, osumnjičeni su pušteni.

I pošiljka se dogodila, jer ih niko nije zaustavio. Zbog toga je možda rezultat toga sarin koji je korišćen u Siriji.

Kada sam pročitao optužnicu, jasno sam video da ti ljudi imaju veze sa Turskim Institutom za mašinsku i hemijsku industriju i da nimalo ne brinu oko prelaska granice.

Na primer, u telefonskim zapisima Hajama Kasapa, mnogo puta ga čujete kako govori sarin gas, govoreći da su ateljei spremni za proizvodnju, materijal čeka u kamionima koji navodno voze gaziranu sodu.

Na primer, hemijski napad u Guti. Zapamtite. Tvrdilo se da iza toga stoje režimske snage. Ovaj napad izveden je samo nekoliko dana pre operacije sarinom u Turskoj.

Velika je verovatnoća da je ovaj napad izveden sa onim osnovnim materijalom koji je isporučen kroz Tursku. Kaže se da su režimske snage odgovorne, ali optužnica kaže da je to ISIS. Inspektori UN-a su otišli na lokaciju, ali nisu uspeli da pronađu nikakve dokaze. Ali u ovoj optužnici smo pronašli dokaze. Znamo ko je koristio gas sarin, a zna to i naša vlada.

Svi osnovni materijali kupuju se iz Evrope. Zapadne institucije treba da se preispitaju o tim odnosima. Zapadni izvori vrlo dobro znaju ko je izvršio gasni napad sarinom u Siriji. Oni znaju ove ljude, znaju sa kim ti ljudi rade, znaju da ti ljudi rade za Al-Kaidu. Mislim da su zapadnjaci licemerni po pitanju ove situacije.“

Šta se još može znati?

1) Rukovodstvo nemačkog parlamenta (sve političke stranke), kao i nemački savezni tužilac su obavešteni 2. decembra 2015. godine, od strane iskreno Vašeg:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (1)

Poštovani poslanici nemačkog parlamenta

Želim da skrenem pažnju na nedavne informacije u vezi sa vašim saveznikom u NATO-u,Turskom. Prošlog meseca su dva hrabra člana turskog parlamenta otkrila da u stvari iza turskih saveznih obaveštajnih službi stoje gasni napad sarinom u avgustu 2013. godine, ubivši više od hiljadu običnih Sirijaca, napad za koji su NATO države okrivile režim Bašera al-Assad. Vaš vlastiti Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) trebalo je da bude svestan ove činjenice od skoro samog početka, jer su proaktivno angažovani u Siriji i sirijskom sukobu, kao i špijunirajući Tursku.

Štaviše, državni akter Turska, koja je pokrenula napad sarinom nije neka nedokumentovana optužba. Kao što vidite iz priloženog izveštaja, turske vlasti su sprovele odgovarajuću istragu sa razvijenim dokazima i optužnicama. Žao mi je što vas obaveštavam da je, u ovom slučaju, predsednik Erdogan lično pokrenuo tužilaštvo koje se prošle nedelje pobrinulo da urednik novinskih izveštaja završi u zatvoru.

Ovo postavlja snažna pitanja o mogućem krivičnom saučesništvu BND-a, s obzirom na podršku Nemačke određenim NATO državama direktno u vezi sa sirijskim sukobom. Šta je BND znao i kada? Da li je BND, prenoseći Asadovoj opoziciji, preko svojih NATO saveznika, obaveštajne podatke o Siriji, podržao aktere koji su izvršili gasni napad na Sirijce? Da li je odnos Nemačke koja podržava vladu Erdogana zakonit, u svetlu ovih dokaza? Da li je BND doprineo geopolitičkim dezinformacijama koje Asada krive za napad sarinom iz avgusta 2013. godine? Da li je vaš parlament prevaren u ovom pitanju, posebno vaš odbor za nadzor obaveštajnih službi?

Jasno je da bi slučaj Sarin, uzevši u obzir Nemačku, kao upućenog aktera ili saučesnika u Siriji, trebalo voditi protiv Turske putem pravnog mehanizma Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, kao i domaće tužbe tih nemačkih zvaničnika, posebno napominjući BND, koji je omanuo u izveštavanju i/ili se urotio u zaveru radi prikrivanja ratnog zločina ili zločina protiv čovečnosti.

To bi trebalo da budu pitanja i zahtevi koje ćete predstaviti saveznom tužiocu.

Ron Vest

2) Nemačka obaveštajna služba (BND) lagala je odboru za nadzor rada obaveštajne službe nemačkog parlamenta:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (2)

(Preveden, obeležen tekst) „Berlin – Federalna obaveštajna služba (BND) podržava ocenu Amerikanaca da režim sirijskog predsednika Bašara al-Asada stoji iza napada otrovnim gasom u predgrađu Damaska 21. avgusta. U tajnim poverljivim izjavama za bezbednosne političare, predsednik BND Gerhard Šindler rekao je da nedostaje jasan dokaz. Nakon dubinske analize verodostojnosti, međutim, njegovo ministarstvo pretpostavlja da je krivac režim.“

Na engleskom, u Der Spiegel:

Strana obaveštajna agencija zemlje, Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), slaže se sa stavom SAD-a koji smatra da je sirijski predsednik Bašar Asad odgovoran za napade otrovnim gasovima u blizini Damaska 21. avgusta. Na tajnom brifingu za odabir poslanika u ponedeljak, šef BND-a Gerhard Šindler rekao je da, iako još uvek nema neospornih dokaza, analiza dostupnih dokaza navela je njegovu obaveštajnu službu da veruje da je kriv Asadov režim.

Na brifingu je Šindler rekao da samo Asadov režim poseduje binarno hemijsko oružje poput sarina. BND veruje da bi režimski stručnjaci bili jedini sposobni za proizvodnju takvog oružja i njegovo raspoređivanje malim raketama. BND veruje da je takvo oružje korišćeno nekoliko puta pre napada 21. avgusta, za koje se veruje da je usmrtilo više od 1.400 ljudi

3) Možemo znati da je BND bolje znao zbog obaveštajnih oficira koji su bili previše glupi da bi držali jezik za zubima. U stvari BND nije nadležan samo u Siriji, BND je posvećen svrgavanju Asada:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (3)

U izveštaju se navode reči američkog obaveštajnog agenta koji kaže: „Nijedna zapadna obaveštajna služba nema tako dobre izvore u Siriji kao što ima BND.“

Član BND-a rekao je za novine da je obaveštajna služba „ponosna na važan doprinos koji je srušila Asadov režim“. Nije navedeno ime zvaničnika u izveštaju.

Ono što će se znati je, ovo su sve informacije koje su stavljene pred nemačke parlamentarce i koje su bile u njihovom posedu u poslednje dve godine, čak i dok je Angela Merkel papagajski izveštavala obaveštajne agencije „Asad je to učinio“, bez obzira što Asad to nije učinio, nikada to nije učinio.

Ono što je ružno je da nemački političari prihvataju da ih laže njihova obaveštajna agencija, a pritom drže jezik za zubima i sede na rukama dok poseduju dokaze o stvarnim počiniocima ratnog zločina.

I, ne zaboravimo da hemikalije, sirovine za izradu gasa sarina, dolaze ili su poreklom IZ EVROPE, pre tranzita preko Turske uz pomoć obaveštajne agencije NATO-a (uz saučesništvo obaveštajnih agencija, množina, BND je to zataškao) i predate su u ruke al Kaida i Islamske države.

Na šta bi trebalo da se podseti ovo prikrivanje činjenica zločina otrovnim gasom? Poreklo političke stranke Angele Merkel sa Adenauerom, koji je dočekivao naciste u redove demohrišćana? BND koji je osnovala CIA rehabilitovanjem glavnog ratnog zločinca Rajnharda Gelena? Da li je tačno da Nemačka nikada nije izgubila određenu nacističku crtu?

onlajn izveštaji/referenca:

  1. jul 2018., u 14:19, OTP InformationDesk <> je napsao:


Hvala vam za vašu poruku. Imajte na umu da Međunarodni krivični sud ima vrlo ograničenu nadležnost. Sud se može baviti samo zločinima genocida, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima kako su definisani članovima 6 do 8 Rimskog statuta koji su se dogodili posle 2002, i može vršiti jurisdikciju samo u zemljama koje su ga ratifikovale. Za više informacija o nadležnosti Suda i pun tekst Rimskog statuta, pogledajte stranicu 2 priloženog dokumenta i našu veb stranicu, kao i našu adresu, Savetujemo vam da pažljivo pregledate ove informacije.

Ako i nakon pažljivog pregleda i dalje smatrate da je ICC pravo mesto za vaš slučaj i želite da podnesete zahtev Sudu, sledite uputstva kako to učiniti na stranici 1 priloženog dokumenta. Ako odlučite da pošaljete informacije, koristite samo ovu adresu e-pošte:

Srdačan pozdrav,

OTP informativni desk

Međunarodni krivični sud

Korekcija 5. jula 2018., u odeljku IV, ime Gerhard Šreder, ispravljeno je u Gerhard Šindler (bivši predsednik BND-a). ICC je obavešten o ovoj ispravci.

Ažuriranje od 9. jula 2018.: Sledeća komunikacija primljena od ICC-a:

Hag, 9. jula 2018.


Tužilaštvo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda potvrđuje prijem vaših dokumenata / pisma.

Ova komunikacija je uredno uneta u Registar komunikacija Zavoda. Razmotrićemo ovu komunikaciju, prema potrebi, u skladu sa odredbama Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda.

Imajte na umu da ovo potvrdno pismo ne znači da je istraga otvorena, niti da će istragu otvoriti Tužilaštvo.

Čim se donese odluka, obavestićemo vas, u pisanoj formi, i dostaviti vam razloge za ovu odluku.

Iskreno Vaš,

Mark P. Dilon, šef jedinice za informacije i dokaze







Povezano: Obrazovanje i špijunaža

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Čitajte na srpskom

After two years of sitting on letters from the ICC it became the apropos time to act; considering the German ambassador to Serbia in April 2021 made some remarks picked up on by a Western corporate media front:

^ Rockefeller Brothers Fund awards Balkan Investigative Reporting Network [BIRN] Pristina office on average of USD $100,000 per year, only one source of funds BIRN rakes in from Western corporate largesse [1]

So, what did the German ambassadorial chump have to say? Despite there being no legal United Nations authorization for the NATO bombing of Serbia, the decision to bomb Serbia…

“had to be made in order to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe” [2]

… well, huh. No mention of the recent packing off of Kosovo’s leaders to war crimes trials? Oh, and what about those BND (German CIA) ‘people’ using the Konrad Adenauer Siftung as a front to train and install neo-nazi fascists in Ukraine? Ever wonder what BND might be up to in Belgrade? [3], [4]

We don’t have to time travel to the early-mid 1940s to understand “Deutschland über Alles” should be seen a bit differently in the eyes of certain of Germany’s neighboring countries than most of today’s ordinary German mortals might think. But German Ambassador to Serbia, Thomas Schieb, is no ordinary German mortal, he presides over the location where Germany’s BND (nee Gehlen Organization) is centered in Belgrade.

Meanwhile, let’s have a look at an International Criminal Court letter (initial denial) concerning some very nasty acts by the German state; that is ‘laundering’ a false flag war crime resulting in the deaths of well over 1,000 Syrian civilians (keep reading, all necessary context and evidence had been presented.)

Note the dates of the letter; 4 July 2018 the complaint had been received by the ICC, 6 February 2019 is the date the ICC denied it held jurisdiction to investigate. This was no snap reply, seven months indicates, if not soul-searching, then at least some considerable time put into thinking about the necessary circumlocution to avoid having to deal with the wealth of information put before the court. I contested this denial with a communication (published online) pointing out a history of the ICC subject to improper influences and demand they reconsider. [5]

The first letter is a more generic denial, the second letter is a contortion to explain the court finds some “serious allegations” are beyond its reach to investigate:

When the International Criminal Court [ICC] itself is complicit in covering up war crimes by German state actors in the 21st Century, everyone at the top should have some explaining to do. In short, what follows is, there is ample evidence prima facie [Latin term: ‘on its face’] German intelligence had “aided & abetted” [assisted] with laundering false flag chemical attacks in Syria including the notorious (especially murderous) sarin gas attack at Ghouta, Syria, in August, 2013. This information had been provided to German parliamentarians and as well as the International Criminal Court. The Germans were silent and the International Criminal Court protests it has no jurisdiction, per the second letter:

“The Office of the Prosecutor has carefully examined your latest communication. I regret to advise you that the Prosecutor has confirmed that the communication does not introduce new facts or evidence that would alter the previous determination that there is not a basis to proceed under the Rome Statute. Under the Rome Statute, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8), when committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over such crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court (Article 13). In the light of these requirements, your communication still appears, after careful re-examination, to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court.

“I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address. We are grateful for your continued interest in the International Criminal Court”

The ICC is clearly wrong. And cowardly & corrupt. Germany is a signatory to the ICC, and the crime of aiding and abetting (false flag laundering) is undoubtedly centered inside the German state. The ICC, to escape this (despite admission of “serious allegations”), appears to be narrowly defining jurisdiction (limiting the applicable charges) to the crime as committed in Syria (and thus avoids the charge of aiding & abetting) and therefore denies jurisdiction rather than take on German state intelligence (the Bundesnachrichtendienst or BND) and Angela Merkel’s minions.

The question that arises in philosophy of law is, does the ICC itself become complicit in the aiding & abetting [assisting] the alleged laundering of the false flag operation by a clearly deliberate ‘narrow’ reading of international law and providing a patently cowardly rationale excusing themselves from having to investigate a major war crime? Methinks, yes:

Ghouta_August_2013 - 1

Here is the complaint itself, followed by my communications with the ICC leading to filing the initial complaint:

Dear Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court

Thank you for the invitation to formalize my complaint concerning the crime of sarin gas employed at Ghouta, Syria, in August of 2013.


Under customary international law, aiding and abetting war crimes includes three elements:

(1) A Principal person or entity committed a war crime;
(2) Another actor committed an act that had a substantial effect upon the commission of the underlying offence; and
(3) Required mental state: The other actor knew that that such an act would assist, or had the substantial likelihood of assisting, the commission of the underlying offense.


1) Turkey, a NATO nation, via its’ intelligence agency MIT, conspired with al Qaida (a proposed clandestine NATO affiliate) to commit a war crime, that is the (false flag) gassing and death of more than one thousand civilians at Ghouta, Syria, in August, 2013.

2) Officials of NATO actor Germany, a signatory to The Rome Statute, provided ‘cover’ via propaganda and other, related means (e.g. laundering false information to media via parliamentary oversight) allowing the actual perpetrators to escape scrutiny despite German intelligence knowing:

3) Such act (immediate preceding) substantially would assist the commission of the specified crime or in other words, enable false-flag  impunity.


Arts 49/50/129/146 of the four Geneva Conventions (1949) requiring the Member States to prosecute and punish all ‘persons’ who commit grave breaches (Ambos [2014] 146). Accordingly, the Elements of Crimes of the ICC Statute do not provide an explicit note for the category of perpetrators as there was no dissent during the negotiations at the Rome Conference that war crimes can be committed by both members of armed forces and civilians (Dörmann, Elements of War Crimes [2003] 391).


Going to the immediate preceding (III), this petitioner to the International Criminal Court (Ronald Thomas West) holds persons in any government signatory to the Rome Statute are prohibited from aiding and abetting a war crime or crime against humanity no matter the crime had been outside the courts purview (non-signatory state) when the aiding and abetting is committed within the courts purview (a signatory state.) This would include certain Western democracies intelligence agencies employees and aligned politicians providing cover for perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Named persons of the German federal security service and responsible politicians (Bundesnachrichtendienst) who’ve proactively (provided false information) or passively (allowed false information) to purposely aid and abet the actual perpetrators (Turkey’s MIT in partnership with al-Qaida) of the (false flag) gas attack at Ghouta, Syria in August 2013 include (but is not limited to) past president of BND Gerhard Schindler, present president of BND Bruno Kahl, Helge Braun (oversight minister) and Angela Merkel.

Named persons directing the German office of the Federal Prosecutor (Generalbundesanwalt/Generalbundesanwältin) who’ve failed to investigate and prosecute domestically and internationally (universal jurisdiction for war crimes or Völkerstrafgesetzbuch) are Harald Range and Peter Frank.

Named German parliamentarians (leadership and/or senior members) who’ve been in possession (since at least December 2015) of exculpatory evidence exonerating President Bashar al Assad and his officials and military of the sarin attack at Ghouta, Syria, in August 2013 and have failed to take appropriate action to bring the German intelligence service and/or German political actors into compliance with established facts per international law and consequently protected a NATO actor and their al-Qaida partners from the light as the actual perpetrators include (but are not limited to) Hans-Christian Stroebele, Ulla Jelpke, Irene Mihalic, Michael Hartmann, Armin Schuster, Norbert Lammert, Peter Hintze, Johannes Singhammer, Edelgard Bulmahn, Ursula Schmidt, Petra Pau, Claudia Roth, Marieluise Beck, Omid Nouripour, Stefan Liebich, Niels Annen, Roderich Kiesewetter and Gregor Gysi.


To contextualize the long habit of Western intelligence agencies sponsoring and/or aiding and abetting false-flag state terror it is recommended the ICC prosecutor review the history of GLADIO:

and moving into present time with GLADIO B:

For a larger understanding of the underlying or founding criminal nature/background of Germany’s Bundesnachrichtendienst it is recommended the ICC prosecutor review the BND origins and history of the Gehlen Organization:

To understand German officials presently in power continue to play underhanded widely in the present geopolitical era, this information is provided:

Contextualizing the NATO nations (includes Rome Statute signatory Germany) intelligence agencies relationship to the chemical crimes of al-Qaida in Syria, it is recommended the ICC prosecutor examine the journalism of Vanessa Beeley concerning the so-called White Helmets:

Buttressing the Turkish MP Eren Erdem’s statement ‘rebel’ (al-Qaida) chemicals were sourced in Europe, is Russian military intelligence:


Western intelligence agencies have a long history of underhanded play (criminal activity.) In the case of Germany’s BND aiding and abetting al-Qaida in Syria, there is strong evidence prima facie of deliberately laundering false information through the Federal German Parliament (Bundestag) intelligence oversight committee to media effecting the coverup (concealing the actual perpetrators) of a war crime involving sarin gas, per the original information provided to the ICC as amended:

Eren_Erdem - 1

What Can Be Known Versus What Will Be Known

Likely, it will only be a matter time before the CIA editors at Wikipedia will change the recently updated information in the above (cropped-enlarged screenshot) Wikipedia article last updated 4 April 2018:

“Erdem also claims that sarin-gas was transported through Turkey to Syria, later used in the Ghouta chemical attack in 2013,[4][5] as well as later ISIL-attacks against civilians.[6] Erdem showed before the parliament a case where investigations leading to the arrest of 13 potential Turkish ISIL-members were made, but later inexplicably dropped.[7][8]

“Erdem faces treason charges in Turkey for his leaks.[5]

What is Turkish Member of Parliament Eren Erdem on record as having stated? Speaking of a copy in his possession of the Adana Prosecutor’s criminal case 2013/120 that was quashed by Erdogan’s people:

“There is data in this indictment. Chemical weapon materials are being brought to Turkey and being put together in Syria in camps of ISIS which was known as Iraqi Al Qaeda during that time

“These are all detected. There are phone recordings of this shipment like ‘don’t worry about the border, we’ll take care of it’ and we also see the bureaucracy is being used

“About the shipment, Republic prosecutor of Adana, Mehmet Arıkan, made an operation and the related people were detained. But as far as I understand he was not an influential person in bureaucracy. A week after, another public prosecutor was assigned, took over the indictment and all the detainees were released. And they left Turkey crossing the Syrian border

“The phone recordings in the indictment showed all the details from how the shipment was going to be made to how it was prepared, from the content of the labs to the source of the materials. Which trucks were going to be used, all dates etc. From A to Z, everything was discussed and recorded. Despite all of this evidence, the suspects were released

“And the shipment happened, because no one stopped them. That’s why maybe the sarin gas used in Syria is a result of this

“When I read the indictment, I saw clearly that these people have relationships with The Machinery and Chemical Industry Institution of Turkey and they don’t have any worries about crossing the border

“For example in Hayyam Kasap’s phone records, you hear him saying sarin gas many times, saying that the ateliers are ready for production, materials are waiting in trucks which were supposedly carrying club soda

“For example the chemical attack in Ghouta. Remember. It was claimed that the regime forces were behind it. This attack was conducted just days before the sarin operation in Turkey

“It’s a high probability that this attack was carried out with those basic materials shipped through Turkey. It is said the regime forces are responsible but the indictment says it’s ISIS. UN inspectors went to the site but they couldn’t find any evidence. But in this indictment, we’ve found the evidence. We know who used the sarin gas, and our government knows it too

“All basic materials are purchased from Europe. Western institutions should question themselves about these relations. Western sources know very well who carried out the sarin gas attack in Syria. They know these people, they know who these people are working with, they know that these people are working for Al-Qaeda. I think is Westerns are hypocrites about the situation”

What more can be known?

1) The German Parliament’s leadership (all political parties), as well the German Federal Prosecutor, had been apprised of the preceding by yours truly on 2 December 2015:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (1)

Dear Members of the German Parliament

I wish to draw attention to recent information regarding your NATO ally Turkey. Last month it had been revealed by two courageous members of Turkey’s parliament that in fact it was Turkey’s federal intelligence services were behind the August 2013 Sarin gas attack, killing more than one thousand ordinary Syrians, an attack NATO nations had blamed on the regime of Basher al-Assad. Your own Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) should have been aware of this fact from very nearly the beginning, as they have been proactively engaged in Syria and the Syrian conflict, as well as spying on Turkey.

What’s more is, state actor Turkey initiating the Sarin attack is not some undocumented allegation. As you can see from the attached reporting, there was a proper investigation by Turkish authorities with developed evidence and indictments. I regret to inform you in this case, President Erdogan personally initiated the prosecution that last week saw the editor of the newspaper reporting put in jail.

This raises strong questions of possible BND criminal complicity considering Germany’s support for certain NATO nations directly in relation to the Syrian conflict. What did the BND know and when? Has the BND, when passing intelligence on Syria to Assad’s opposition through its NATO allies, supported the actors who gassed the Syrians? Is Germany’s supportive relationship to the Erdogan government a lawful one, in light of this evidence? Has the BND contributed to the geopolitical disinformation blaming Assad for the August 2013 Sarin attack? Has your parliament been deceived in this matter, particularly your intelligence oversight committee?

Clearly the Sarin case, considering Germany, as a knowledgeable or complicit actor in Syria, should be pursued against the Turkey via the legal mechanism of Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, as well as domestic prosecutions of those German officials, noting the BND particularly, who’ve failed in their reporting requirements and/or conspired to conceal a war crime or crime against humanity.

These should be questions and demand you will present to the federal prosecutor.

Ron West

2) Germany’s foreign intelligence service (BND) lied to the German parliament’s intelligence oversight committee:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (2)

(Translated, highlighted text) “Berlin – The Federal Intelligence Service (BND) supports the assessment of the Americans that the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is behind the poison gas attacks on suburbs of Damascus on 21 August. In secret classified statements for security politicians, BND President Gerhard Schindler said a clear proof is missing. After an in-depth plausibility analysis, however, his ministry assumes that the regime is the culprit”

At Der Spiegel English:

[T]he country’s foreign intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), agrees with the US position which holds Syrian President Bashar Assad responsible for the poison gas attacks near Damascus on Aug. 21. In a secret briefing to select lawmakers on Monday, BND head Gerhard Schindler said that while there is still no incontestable proof, analysis of the evidence at hand has led his intelligence service to believe that Assad’s regime is to blame.

In the briefing, Schindler said that only the Assad regime is in possession of binary chemical weapons such as sarin. The BND believes that regime experts would be the only ones capable of manufacturing such weapons and deploying them with small missiles. The BND believes that such weapons had been used several times prior to the attack on Aug. 21, which is believed to have killed more than 1,400 people

3) We can know BND knew better because of intelligence officers who were too stupid to keep their mouths shut. In fact BND is not only competent in Syria, BND is dedicated to the overthrow of Assad:

Eren_Erdem - 1 (3)

The report quotes a US intelligence agent as saying: “No Western intelligence service has as good sources in Syria as the BND does.”

A member of the BND told the newspaper that the intelligence service was “proud of the important contribution [it] is making to the overthrow of the Assad regime.” The official was not named in the report

What will be known is, this is all information had been put before German parliamentarians and has been in their possession for the past two years, even as Angela Merkel parrots the intelligence agencies “Assad did it” no matter Assad didn’t do it, has never done it.

What is ugly is, German politicians accept being lied to by their own intelligence agency while keeping their mouths shut and sitting on their hands when in possession of evidence of the actual perpetrators of a war crime.

And, let’s not forget the sarin gas precursor chemicals were originally sourced or originated IN EUROPE, prior to transiting Turkey via a NATO nation’s intelligence agency (with complicity of intelligence agencies, plural, BND has covered this up), and delivered into the hands of al Qaida & Islamic State.

What should this covering up facts of a crime of poison gas recall? Angela Merkel’s political party’s origins with Adenauer welcoming Nazis into the Christian Democrats’ ranks? The BND founded by the CIA’s rehabilitation of major war criminal Reinhard Gehlen? Is it true Germany has never shed certain Nazi spots?

online record/reference:

On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:19 PM, OTP InformationDesk <> wrote:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for your message. Please note that the International Criminal Court has a very limited jurisdiction. The Court may only address the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as defined by Articles 6 to 8 of the Rome Statute that have occurred after 2002, and can only exercise jurisdiction in the countries that have ratified it. For more information on the Court’s jurisdiction and the full text of the Rome Statute, please refer to page 2 of the attached document and our website as well as our address, We encourage you to carefully review this information.

If, after your careful review, you still believe the ICC is the correct place for your case and would like to submit a claim to the Court, then please follow the directions for how to do so on page 1 of the attached document. If you decide to submit information, kindly use only this email address :

Kind regards,

OTP Information Desk
International Criminal Court

5 July 2018 correction, in section IV, the name ‘Gerhard Schroeder, has been corrected to Gerhard Schindler (past president of the BND.) The ICC has been notified of this correction.

9 July 2018 update: The following communication received from the ICC:

The Hague, 9 July 2018

Dear sir/madam

The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court acknowledges receipt of your documents/letter.

This communication has been duly entered in the Communications Register of the Office. We will give consideration to this communication, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Please note this acknowledgement letter does not mean an investigation has been opened, nor that an investigation will be opened by the Office of the Prosecutor.

As soon as a decision is reached, we will inform you, in writing, and provide you with reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely,
Mark P. Dillon, 
Head of Information & Evidence Unit
Office of The Prosecutor







A former Special Forces Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald is published in International Law as a layman (The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole) and has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s Western educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Read in English

Priča o tome kako se odbrana svete zemlje američkih starosedelaca promenila, za više od dvadeset godina, u igru međunarodnih intriga i preživljavanja atentata; sa zaključcima

Hronologija događaja u slučaju Ronalda Tomasa Vesta (skraćeni rezime)


Flojd Heviraner, tradicionalni ratni poglavica Blekfit Indijanaca u Montani, me je 1987. godine zamolio da nadgledam interes Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (Šumska služba) za traženje nafte i prirodnog gasa na zemljištu plemena Blekfit, zaštićenim sporazumom, poznatom kao „Badger-Two-Medicine“, takođe poznat kao „Ustupljeni pojas“, koji podleže plemenskim pravima po takozvanom „Grinel sporazumu“ koji je takođe poznat kao „Ugovor iz 1895“.

Flojd je 1988. godine, angažovao Marka Milera iz Ostina, u Teksasu (koji je imao licencu u Montani) kao pravnog zastupnika za Blekfitovo „Društvo hrabrih pasa“, takođe poznato kao i „Ludi psi“, u Flojdovom svojstvu tradicionalnog kulturnog vođe te drevne plemenske organizacije.

Do 1991. godine, kao glavni istražitelj u ime Društva hrabrih pasa, u udruženju sa Markom Milerom, prikupio sam obimne dokumentarne dokaze protiv kriminalnog prstena, koji je radio unutar Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, u ime korporacije ŠEVRON, a koji su sadržali detalje orkestriranog nastojanja da lažiraju usklađenost sa zakonima, koji bi inače trebalo da štite to područje u ime Društva hrabrih pasa, koji obuhvata službenike Sjedinjenih Američkih Država koji su vršili nezakonite radnje, uključujući krivična dela:

Laganje Hrabrim psima i veću Laganje javnosti

Laganje Kongresa o sledećim posebnim primenjivim zakonima (Zakon o nacionalnom istorijskom očuvanju „tradicionalne kulturne baštine“)

Prikrivanje od Hrabrih pasa, veća i javnosti da je Šumska služba upoznata sa tim primenjivim zakonima

Prikrivanje obuke službenika Šumske službe za te iste primenjive zakone Namerno kršenje tih istih zakona, u korist ŠEVRONA

Ova inkriminišuća dokumenta, uzeta zajedno, ukazuju na isprepletenu i organizovanu kriminalnu mrežu, oličenu u vladinim službenicima koji rade u korist ŠEVRONA, u svrhu namernog lažiranja usklađenosti sa zakonom, koji ide do najviših nivoa Sjedinjenih Američkih Država u Vašingtonu DC. Ovaj poseban kriminalni događaj je organizovan i njime se upravljalo iz sedišta Severnog regiona jedan Šumske službe Sjedinjenih Američkih Država u Misuli, u Montani, a implementiran je preko kancelarija Luis i Klark, Nacionalne šume u Grejt Folz, u Montani.

Ova dokumenta su inkorporirana u administrativnu žalbu kada su ŠEVRON-ove (i FINA-ine) dozvole za bušenje bile odobrene po automatizmu u sedištu Severnog regiona jedan u Misuli. Ova žalba je momentalno zaustavila projekat. Neprilika u prikrivanju kriminalne mreže postignuta je birokratskim nalogom, kada je FBI odbio da se uključi (lično sam informisao agenta koji je pregledao dokumentaciju i priznao njihov sadržaj, ali je tvrdio da nema ovlašćenje da reaguje i uputio me na kancelariju tužioca Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (Ministarstva pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država) u Bilingsu, u Montani, za koga je izjavio da je veoma dobro upoznat sa problemima). Nakon što je Generalni inspektor Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država odbio da ovo istraži, kancelarija Generalnog inspektora Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država je izjavila da oni neće da se uključe pod izgovorom da je to pitanje već potegnuto u procesu administrativne žalbe. Pošto se vlada (i Ševron) nisu usudili da dozvole da dokumenta uđu u evidenciju federalnog suda, gde bi bili stavljeni pred sudiju (ili sudije po žalbi u sudskoj parnici), senator Sjedinjenih Američkih Država Maks Baukus je napravio politički dil sa Ševronom koji je sadržao zamenu najma i Ševron se povukao. Kada sam ja lično uspeo da stavim inkriminišuća dokumenta u ruke (odnedavno novog) šefa Šumske službe Flojda Tomasa, on je pokušao da zatvori sedište Severnog regiona jedan

i da premesti operacije u Denver gde „bi bile pod pomnim nadzorom“. Bili su potrebni napori dva senatora Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, Maksa Baukusa i Konrada Bernsa da se ovo preokrene.


Beleška 2) Dva advokata koji su informisali vladinu stranu (Šumsku službu) o domorodačkim pravnim problemima tokom ovog perioda, Džon Ju i Džej Bajbi, kasnije će postati ozloglašeni kao Bušovi „advokati za mučenje“ povezani sa Kondolizom Rajs. Kondoliza Rajs je (pre i posle Bušovog režima) imala bliske veze sa ŠEVRONOM.

Beleška 3) Sedište „Severnog regiona jedan“ u Montani ima dugu vezu sa CIA-om, koja datira od 1950-ih i još uvek aktivan odnos u 1970-ima i verovatno tokom 1980-tih i kasnije, u vezi sa avio uslugama, viškom imovine i pranja novca kroz vazduhoplove korišćene u agencijskom prevozu oružja i otpadničkih elemenata (crni budžet) međunarodne trgovine narkoticima.

Beleška 4) Tokom mog istraživačkog rada, kojim je otkriven kriminalni prsten unutar vlade koji radi za ŠEVRON, Asocijacija veterana je iznenada i lažno dijagnostifikovala da bolujem od „psihoze“. Uspeo sam da poništim ovo tako što sam nezavisno otišao na evaluaciju u isti medicinski centar koji je Asocijacija veterana koristila za proučavanje šizofrenije, i ispalo je da sam čist.

Beleška 5) Nakon ovoga, moju evidenciju u Asocijaciji veterana je pregledao „specijalista“ iz Vašingtona DC i određena dokumenta su nestala, tako da izgleda kao da sam ja prevario Asocijaciju veterana. Na zakazanom saslušanju, gde sam pokazao kopiju kritičnog dokumenta koji nedostaje i koji je bio neophodan za moju odbranu, saslušanje je otkazano na licu mesta, a optužbe odbačene.

Beleška 6) 1998. godine sam dao ostavku na poslu u Milerovoj advokatskoj kancelariji zbog zdravstvenih problema.


2001. godine, iz Vest Glasiera, u Montani preselio sam se u Sandija Park, u Novi Meksiko. Nakon toga, krajem leta 2005. godine, upisao sam najmlađeg sina u Ist Mauntin srednju školu (čarter škola), instituciju za ubrzano učenje. Škola je slučajno imala značajne veze sa moćnim ličnostima u korporativnom vojno-industrijskom kompleksu u Albukerkiju.

Do kasne jeseni, intenzivan pritisak je započeo u obliku prekomernog maltretiranja, činilo se da je namera da budemo naterani da napustimo školu.

Započeo sam sopstvenu istragu i otkrio suštinske razloge. Tokom ovog procesa, ono što sam sam otkrio bilo je sledeće:

Krivična dela vezana za obrazac ponašanja škole i opsežna kršenja građanskih prava posebno učenika manjina, i drugih učenika, od strane neprikladnog uticaja ličnosti ultra desnog krila, rasističkog, „Hrišćanskog Dominiona“.

Ono što spolja izgleda je da je to američka čarter škola (EMHS) sa ubačenim obaveštajnim agentima koji su zaposleni kao nastavnici.

Moguće korišćenje „putovanja u inostranstvo“ sponzirisanih od strane škole kao pokriće za tajne operacije u Latinskoj Americi i Evropi.

U međuvremenu, izazvao sam paralelnu istragu (od kraja 2006. do proleća 2007. godine) o nezakonitim aktivnostima škole, od strane člana školskog upravnog veća, Džima Hilija, u pogledu maltretiranja mog sina i mene. Tokom ove druge (paralelne) istrage od strane člana školskog upravnog veća Džima Hilija, prišao mi je drugi član školskog upravnog veća, David Volter, koji me je obavestio da stajem na žulj članovima „Veća za odnose sa inostranstvom“ i upozorio me (pretnja) „Da se nisi usudio da umešaš advoкate“. Volter je dalje izjavio da bilo kakva akcija da se škola bude odgovorna „Nema šanse“ ni pod kakvim okolnostima. Za manje od godinu dana, jedan nastavnik iz škole (ubačeni obaveštajac, skoro sigurno CIA), Vins Langan, bio je deo tima koji je pokušao da mi postavi zasedu u Berlinu.

Sa nerešenim slučajem Ist Mauntin srednje škole, sveže razveden, prodatom kućom i najmlađim detetom na koledžu, otišao sam iz Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, u julu 2007. godine, da prisustvujem konferenciji na univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg u Majncu, u Nemačkoj.

Nisam imao nameru da se vratim u Sjedinjene Američke Države u kratkom roku, shvatajući da sam stvorio moćne korumpirane neprijatelje, a bez adekvatnih resursa koji su neophodni da se izvrši zatvaranje slučaja čarter škole. Ipak, u međuvremenu sam pokazao osobama koje su povezane sa školskom administracijom da nisam imao nameru da ostavim taj slučaj. To je proizvelo sledeći rezultat:

3. oktobra 2007. godine, rutinski sam tražio bankomat (ATM) koji sam obično koristio kod Johan Taler Čosi šoping centra u berlinskom predgrađu Bric. Tokom moje procene (profesionalna bezbednosna obuka) da li ima nekih pretnji, uspeo sam da pokrenem tim koji je čekao u zasedi kod lokacije bankomata. Pošto sam ih uočio pre nego što su shvatili da su otkriveni, uspeo sam da vizuelno identifikujem Vinsa Langana iz Ist Mauntin srednje škole, jednog od ubica, u okolnostima u kojima su mi i omogućili da pobegnem i da učinim da Langan shvati da je identifikovan. Dve nedelje kasnije, imao sam drugi bliski susret sa pokušajem ubistva od strane nepoznate osobe u metrou broj 7.

Smesta sam (sledećeg jutra) otišao iz Berlina u Lindau (Bodenze).

Beleška 7) Moje praćenje do lokacije bankomata u inostranstvu zahtevalo je pristup mojim bankovnim informacijama koje mogu da se dobiju preko takozvanog „Pisma o nacionalnoj sigurnosti“. Ovo ukazuje na umešanost korumpiranog FBI-a.


Otišavši iz Berlina u Lindau sredinom oktobra, ubrzo sam organizovao preko treće strane (REDIGOVANO) pozivnicu za nemačke vlasti da nadgledaju moju situaciju („pratite me i gledajte“). Ovo je bio namerni trik da uhvatim u zamku ono u šta sam verovao (u to vreme) da je bio pokušaj ubistva uzbunjivača (mene), u vezi sa krivičnim delima koja su počinile bogate, korumpirane ličnosti povezane sa Ist Mauntin srednjom školom.

Dve nedelje kasnije, jednog ranog nedeljnog jutra 4. novembra 2007. godine, dok sam šetao, kada je napolju bilo malo ljudi, prigušeni metak ispaljen iz puške sa velike udaljenosti za malo me je promašio i napravio rupu u parkiranom automobilu pored koga sam prolazio.

Posle toga, u utorak 4. decembra 2007. godine, shvatio sam da sam privukao nemački nadzor koji sam tražio, kada sam putovao da održim prezentaciju u grupi studenata (REDIGOVANO), nemačka policija je pročešljala voz kojim sam putovao, tražila jednog putnika u mom vagonu i tražila lične karte od svih i ispitivala sve osim mene.

Beleška 8) Projektil velike brzine je pogodio parkirani automobil, pored kog sam prolazio, takvom silinom, bilo je jasno zbog zvuka, da je probio metal karoserije, odbio se o potporni zid ispred koga je automobil bio, zarotirao se i zaustavio ispod automobila. Vratio sam se na tu lokaciju posle nekoliko dana, procenio mogućnosti i postalo je jasno da je pucanj ispaljen sa velike udaljenosti, sa prirodnog uzvišenja (strane brda) sa dobrim zaklonom sa udaljenosti od možda 500 metara.


Preselio sam se u Limburg u rano proleće 2008. godine, a zatim u Visbaden (u junu), prihvatajući poziv univerziteta u Majncu, da predajem tečaj (na engleskom) o američkom ustavnom pravu (letnji semestar). Ovo leto 2008. godine bila je intenzivna igra mačke i miša za mene, vezano za moje ubice/lovce. Od nekoliko susreta u Visbadenu, najupečatljiviji događaji su:

Moj motorola (Razer) mobilni telefon sa karticom američkog T-mobile iznenada je prestao da se ponaša normalno, nije više pokaziovao „t- mobile D“ (nemački) logo prijem, nije više tražio međunarodni kod da pristupim svojoj govornoj pošti u SAD-u, u stvari ekran je pokazivao (a telefon se ponašao) kao da sam zaista bio u SAD-u. Nekako je imao konekciju oko ili kroz nemačku prijemnu mrežu i izgleda da ga je koristila američka obaveštajna agencija (NSA) da preko GPS nađe moju lokaciju u realnom vremenu. Prebacio sam moj telefon na nemačku t-mobile pripejd karticu.

Otprilike u vreme kada sam primetio da se dogodila ova promena na telefonu, jedna staklena kuglica je ispaljena na mene dok sam šetao trotoarom punim ljudi na Severnoj strani (moje područje stanovanja) u Visbadenu. Čuo sam nešto što je izgledalo kao da je neki snažni mehanizam sa oprugom otpušten iza mene, i okrenuo sam se da pogledam i video jednog čoveka kako me oštro posmatra dok je izlazio iz gužve (braon stetson šešir od čvrstog filca, nosio je akten tašnu), stao na

ulicu, prešao ulicu i pobegao. Nastavio je da gleda u mene kao da je očekivao da će se nešto desiti. Kada sam se vratio u stan, seo sam za radni sto i skinuo pletenu kapu, jedna veoma mala staklena kuglica, izgledalo je kao da je napunjena mutnom tečnošću, ispala je iz moje kape na tastaturu računara. Ova kuglica se zaustavila nedirnuta u mojoj kapi, tamo gde je kapa bila podvijena na potiljku. Pažljivo sam stavio (bez dodirivanja) tu staklenu kuglicu u malu bočicu od leka sa mojim imenom na njoj, i spakovao je u papirnu maramicu kao meru predostrožnosti da se pošalje po (REDIGOVANO) na analizu.

Nakon ovog prethodnog incidenta, primetio sam da je izgledalo kao da sam praćen sa svrhom da se ustanove moje rutinske navike (GPS komponenta je izgleda bila izgubljena zbog moje telefonske konverzije).

Jedna osoba se urezala u moje pamćenje, iako nisam znao ko je ona u leto 2008. godine, bila je tada aktivni CIA službenik, Sabrina De Sousa. Istakla se zbog toga što mi se nasmešila kada je prolazila ulicom. Bila je delimično obučena u ležernu odeću južne Azije i nasmešila mi se znalački i izrazom koji može da se smatra osobitim samo kada sretnete potpunog neznanca. To je obeležilo De Sousu u mom pamćenju.

Od nekoliko pokušaja tokom ovog perioda, jedan pokušaj je jasno ličio na tehniku korišćenu u „Imam rapito affair“ (skandal otetog imama), poznatu i kao slučaj Abu Omar, u koji je De Sousa bila uključena. Vraćao sam se sa svog predavanja u Majncu kada sam primetio (zahvaljujući svojoj obuci) odstupanje od nečega što bi inače izgledalo kao jedan normalan i nebitan događaj. Grupa muškaraca, obučena u tipično plavo nemačko radno odelo za muškarce, bila je na pauzi.

Ta okolnost mi je upala u oči dok sam prilazio, iz sledećih razloga: nije bilo razgovora uopšte, izgledali su „namešteno“ (ukočeno, kao da im je gluma nepoznata radnja), imali su američki govor tela i ono što bih nazvao fizički izgled „Delta jedinica“ (građu tela koju biste tipično sreli kod hiper fizički istreniranih vojnika za specijalne operacije). Izuzev odeće, uopšte nisu izgledali kao nemački radnici. Moja ruta trotoarom bi me odvela između onoga što je bio zbijeni polukrug trojice ovih „radnika“ i polukruga zatvorenog prema ulici belim kombijem bez prozora, sa otvorenim kliznim bočnim vratima sa najmanje jednim putnikom.

Postojao je četvrti „radnik“ na mestu suvozača (sa otvorenim vratima) jednog automobila parkiranog odmah iza kombija, koji je krio registarske tablice kombija sa zadnje strane. Izgledalo je da je on postavljen na „zadnju poziciju“, u slučaju ako bih ja izbegao ili nekako prošao kroz prvu trojicu, bio je postavljen da me ugura u kombi. Jasno, očekivalo se da ću proći između polukruga i kombija. Prišao sam nezainteresovano, da bih prišao što je bliže moguće zbog vizuelne procene, i u poslednjem momentu umesto da nastavim trotoarom u ono što je sigurno bila zamka kako bi me „zgrabili“ i „oteli“ (mogli su da me ubace u kombi i nadvladaju za nekoliko sekundi, manje od pet, sigurno), skrenuo sam na ulicu, u saobraćaj (imao sam sreće da me neka kola nisu pregazila). Izbegavanje je bilo jednostavno.

Poslednji pokušaj u Visbadenu je bio kada je stan, koji sam iznajmljivao, trebalo da bude oglašen za nove podstanare. Momentalno se zainteresovao jedan par, koji je tamo živeo u vojnoj bazi Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Ovaj nemački par nije mogao da iščeka da preuzme stan od mene, bili su nervozni da se usele što je pre moguće. On je bio iz bivšeg DDR-a, bio je veliki obožavalac Džordža Buša i radio je za američku vojsku u nekom tajnom svojstvu (neuhvatljivo), a ona je vodila cvećaru u bazi.

Ubrzo me je nazvala i izjavila da bi volela da donese neke pakete da ostavi u stanu, veče pre nego što se ja iselim (u petak), što je dodatno upalilo crvenu lampicu. Jednostavno sam rekao da me nazove u utorak pre toga i da onda pita, pošto još nisam mogao da znam da li ću biti kod kuće to veče kada je ona želela da dođe sa paketima. Znao sam (ali nisam rekao) da je vlasnik stana želeo da nešto renovira. Otišao sam nedelju dana pre mog roka za izlazak, i kada je ona nazvala, stan je u potpunosti prečešljao vlasnik, a ja sam već sedam dana bio izvan Visbadena. Kada je pitala da li paketi mogu da se donesu u četvrtak, odgovorio sam „Ja sam u Berlinu, moraćete da pitate vlasnika“. Njena reakcija je bila uzvik „On je u Berlinu!“ svom mužu (saučesniku u zaveri) i onda je njen muž počeo sa tiradom na nemačkom… sa nemačkim vlastima koje imaju otvorenu pozivnicu da nadziru sve moje telefonske pozive, ja očekujem da su otkrili dvoje Nemaca koji rade za američku obaveštajnu službu.

Beleška 9) Bez ulaženja u detalje, postavio sam test tokom ovog perioda, posle gašenja GPS na mom telefonu, poveravajući se bliskoj osobi od poverenja preko Skajpa, tehnikom za koju sam očekivao da bi mogla da funkcioniše da me uhvate i uspeju da ubiju. Ovo je bila sledeća tehnika koju su pokušali, ali bio sam spreman za nju, video sam kako se okolnosti razvijaju i osujetio sam im pokušaj.

Beleška 10) Pomenuću ovde, imao sam skoro jednu celu godinu obuke (1974.-1975.) u vojnoj obaveštajnoj službi za specijalne operacije (19-a grupa specijalnih snaga) sa nekima od najiskusnijih u toj eri i, štaviše, visoko sam obučen kao asimetrični kontraobaveštajac, po pitanju tehnike o kojoj nemam pravo da diskutujem. Koliko god bila posredna, referenca može da se napravi za ovu drugu instancu, sa referencom za čitaoca na ovu studiju: „Nekonvencionalna podrška ljudskoj inteligenciji“, od komandanta L.R. Bremseta, mornarica Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, 28. april 2001., Ratni koledž korpusa marinaca.

Beleška 11) REDIGOVANO

Beleška 12) Izgubio sam određene beleške o hronologiji iz ovog perioda i nakon njega, zbog kasnijeg kvara na mom laptopu i posledičnog gubitka podataka. Posle gubitka podataka, izgubio sam naviku da vodim beleške o mnogim mojim doživljajima, ali mogu da rekonstruišem hronologiju nekih važnih događaja sa drugim zapisima.

Beleška 13) Do kraja 2008. godine, shvatio sam da ovo nije izolovan pokušaj ubistva da se zataška korupcija u školi, već je bilo nešto daleko veće. Moja odluka je bila da ovo isteram što više mogu, u nadi da bi, naročito to što me sada nadzire nemačka policija, to dovelo ka obelodanjivanju šire slike prikrivenog napora u pokušaju mog ubistva. U tom momentu, nisam zapravo očekivao da ću preživeti, već sam bio odlučan da napravim što je moguće više štete kriminalnom elementu preko tajnog aranžmana mog nadzora.


Nakon nekoliko nedelja boravka u Berlinu, u decembru 2008. godine, preselio sam se u Kataloniju, u Španiju, i iznajmio stan u gradu San Feliu de Gišol (San Feliu de Guixols).

Moj boravak u Španiji je bio napet, ali ograničiću moje beleške na nekoliko neobičnih događaja.

Španska domaća obaveštajna služba je direktno komunicirala sa mnom, da bi mi stavila do znanja da me prati. Na koji način su to iskomunicirali (uključujući direktno „hvala vam“, između ostalih događaja, u nekoliko prilika) možda najbolje opisuje ovaj rani primer: Imao sam susret vredan pažnje sa jednom ženom u piljarnici pored svog stana. Bilo je to kao scena iz filma Vudija Alena. Samo nekoliko dana kasnije, odigrala se ova ista scena sa mnom i drugom ženom koja mi je prišla u drugoj prodavnici. Očigledno, ona je prostudirala video snimak ranijeg susreta i ovaj drugi susret je blisko imitirao prvi susret, da mi stave do znanja da me nadziru.

Bilo je to dok sam bio u Španiji 2009. godine, CIA-in službenik Sabrina De Sousa je tužila Sjedinjene Američke Države za diplomatski imunitet za njenu ulogu u slučaju „Imam rapito affair“ ili „Abu Omar case“, što je pojavilo kao vest sa njenom fotografijom u onlajn medijima (Nju Jork tajms) i ja sam odmah prepoznao De Sousu kao onu nasmešenu ženu koju sam sreo u Visbadenu prethodnog leta. Dok sam nadgledao AP Wire (RSS prenos), takođe sam zapazio izjavu pripisanu optuženom italijanskom generalu Nikolu Polariju, nešto kao „da je Kondoliza Rajs lično nadgledala tim za otmice u ovom slučaju“. On je želeo da pozove Rajs na sud u svoju odbranu.

Tada je šira slika mojih sopstvenih okolnosti prvi put počela da dobija pravi smisao. Ako je Kondoliza Rajs „lično nadgledala“ tim za izručenja koji je uključivao Sabrinu De Sousa, ovo je pokazivalo da moj slučaj nije bio samo o Ist Mauntin srednjoj školi, već je od ranije imao veze sa slučajem Badger-Two-Medicine Društva hrabrih pasa Blekfita, ŠEVRONOM i administracijom Buša starijeg. Put karijere Rajsove vodio je od ŠEVRONOVOG borda direktora, preko Savetnika za nacionalnu bezbednost kod Buša mlađeg, pa do Državnog sekretara (Stejt Department Sjedinjenih Američkih Država je sijamski blizanac sa CIA- om) i nazad do ŠEVRONA, u eri posle Buša. Kao slučajnost sa ovim, dva advokata koji su pripremali pravne beleške o pravima Indijanaca koje je Šumska služba citirala u slučaju Badger-Two-Medicine, Džon Ju i Džej Bajbi, su od tada postali ozloglašeni kao Bušovi „advokati za mučenje“ u vezi sa izručenjima.

U junu 2009. godine, u vezi sa ovim novim razvojem događaja, otišao sam na kratko putovanje u Berlin da obezbedim u ugašenoj NVO „Asocijaciji za podršku Severnoameričkim Indijancima“ dosije o Blekfit hrabrim psima, za koji sam znao da će sadržati inkriminišuću, povezanu dokumentaciju. Lično sam prošao kroz dosije da se uverim da postoji kompletan zapis dokumentacije o ŠEVRONOVOM kriminalnom prstenu koji sam ranije sreo u administraciji Buša starijeg (sve je bilo tu) i organizovao da ceo dosije bude prosleđen (REDIGOVANO), što je i urađeno.

Nepoznatog datuma (zbog gubitka podataka) drugi metak iz prigušivača me je zamalo promašio, ispaljen iz visoke zgrade u S’garu, dok sam pešačio iz predgrađa S’gara, preko uzvišenja u San Feliu de Gišol. Ovaj događaj se desio dok sam prolazio pored gradilišta, gde se o jedan kameni nasip odbio projektil visoke brzine. Pešak ispred mene je naglo okrenuo glavu u smeru gde je metak pogodio kamen, to nije moglo da se ignoriše.

24. oktobra 2009. godine, izbegao sam da me ciljano pregaze nova, crvena, iznajmljena kola sa dva tamnoputa muškarca, čije su ruke bile prekrivene tetovažama bandi.

20. februara 2010. godine, iznenadio sam bišeg CIA-nog „Kauboja“ Garija Berntsena (sada privatni ugovarač) na recepciji hotela Barcarola u S’garo, bilo je između 7 i 8 ujutro, dok je prijavljivao svoj tim ubica u hotel. Zajedno smo uhvaćeni na sigurnosnoj kameri.

Gari je prvo imao bled zapanjen izgled koji je prešao u izraz lica kao da je uhvaćen sa rukom u kutiji sa kolačićima, i kao da bi želeo da propadne u zemlju, dok sam ja stajao nekoliko centimetara od njega, doslovno dodirujući se laktovima, a njegovi telohranitelji su samo stajali tamo zureći u mene sa zapanjenim glupim izrazom lica u okolnostima kada im je potpuno uništen paravan, nisam mogao a da im se ne nasmejem na odlasku prema vratima. Dao sam im oko šest sati prednosti pre nego što sam postavio tu činjenicu o susretu tog jutra na internet, gde je španska domaća obaveštajna služba gledala moja ažuriranja o susretima. Berntsen i saradnici su bili pametni da pobegnu.

5. jula 2010. godine, imao sam posetu, oko pola sata, kada su dva veoma ljubazna policajca [Mossos] došla na moja vrata. Ono što su

policajci rekli je bilo interesantno. Policija je upisala moje podatke iz pasoša, pitala me o detaljima da potvrde moj identitet, preko radija su izvestili o mom imenu, mojim podacima i dali mi da potpišem izjavu sa zaključkom da živim u tadašnjem stanu „manje-više jednu godinu, da se preda sudiji“ koji je želeo da potvrdi identitet osobe koja živi u mom stanu. Nisam krio činjenicu da sam neprijavljen u Španiji i pojasnio sam da nemam nameru da se prijavim u imigracionom ili da zatražim prebivalište. Policija me je uverila da moj boravak u Španiji nije problem i da ih nije zanimalo ništa drugo osim da potvrde moj identitet za sudiju.

Negde u ovo vreme sam bio poprilično siguran da sam bio otrovan. Jednog dana sam, nakon što sam jeo napolju, iznenada osetio obilno znojenje bez groznice i kasnije, moje zdravlje je krenulo nizbrdo. To i činjenica da je sudija Baltazar Garzon nedavno bio sklonjen sa svoje sudijske stolice u Španiji pod ogromnim pritiskom od strane SAD-a u korumpiranom i političkom procesu (pomno sam pratio slučaj sudije Garzona), zajedno sa Narodnom strankom koja je preuzela vlast, osetio sam da je moj boravak u Španiji neodrživ. Vratio sam se u Berlin u avgustu.

Beleška 14) Letnji period 2009. godine je nestao iz svih mojih onlajn imejl evidencija, počevši ubrzo nakon što sam objavio ovo pismo od 18. februara 2009. godine onlajn, postavljeno 3. juna 2009. godine. Veći deo juna, ceo jul i avgust su nestali i još mnogo toga, do početka 2010. godine, 4 naloga, 3 na google-u i 1 na yahoo-u. Ovo se poklopilo sa mojim prethodnim praćenjem, preko moje debitne kartice Wells Fargo Debit Card (korišćenje bankomata) i od strane T-Mobile USA mobilnog telefona korišćenjem GPS… sve ukazuje na pristupanje mojim različitim računima, uključujući telefon, bankovne račune i imejl naloge, preko Pisma o nacionalnoj bezbednosti i saučesništva organa za sprovođenje zakona da me prate radi pokušaja mog ubistva u egzilu. Pismo koje sam objavio 3. juna:

18. februar 2009. godine Od: Ronald Vest
Za: Federalni istražni biro Pozdrav FBI

Molim vas da kopija ovog mejla bude stavljena u moj dosije i da istinita i potpuna kopija bude prosleđena Glenu Fajnu u kancelariju Generalnog inspektora u Ministarstvu pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Na osnovu mojih iskustava protekle tri i po godine manje-više, zahtevam sledeće:

Istragu i sveobuhvatni pregled bilo kojih povezanih istraga koje su dozvolile bilo kojoj agenciji Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, uključujući i vašu, pristup (preko Pisma o nacionalnoj bezbednosti ili BILO KOJIH sredstava, npr. Izvršnim nalogom ili pravnim memorandumom koji zaobilazi „FISА“ sud, itd.) mojim ličnim podacima (posebno o mom kretanju preko zapisa bankomata i (GPS) mobilnog telefona, imejla i razgovora na „skajpu“) koje su mogle da dovedu do nekoliko iskustava uključujući, ali ne ograničavajući se na:

U Berlinu, u Nemačkoj, u Johanes Taler Čosi tržnom centru (područje Britz Sud) u veoma bliskoj i napetoj situaciji vrebao me je Vins Langan (ili njegov brat blizanac) iz Ist Mauntin srednje škole (Sandia Park, NM) zajedno sa saučesnikom, 3. oktobra 2007. godine. Kako to može da bude u vezi sa, nekoliko nedelja kasnije, metkom iz prigušivača koji me je zamalo promašio i napravio rupu u vozilu pored kojeg sam prolazio u Lindau, u Nemačkoj.

Pod kojim okolnostima su dalji lov i ono što izgleda da je pokušaj ubistva u vezi sa mojim t-mobile telefonom, konektovanim direktno kroz t-mobile mrežu SAD-a, dok sam bio u širem području regiona Frankfurta, Limburga i Visbadena, posebno krajem marta-početkom aprila 2008. godine, premošćavajući „t-mobile-D“, a ekran je pokazivao i telefon se ponašao kao da sam bio u SAD-u, i koja je veza toga sa prethodno rečenim.

I u vezi sa svim navedenim gore, pregled aktivnosti (REDIGOVANO), bilo da je ona vaša, ili imovina bilo koje agencije u SAD-u ili je sa vama na principu usluga-za-uslugu ili bilo kojom agencijom u SAD-u ili u bilo kojem svojstvu ili povezanim istragama ili akcijama iz prethodnih pasusa, sarađivala u nekoj istrazi ili povezanoj akciji koja me se tiče direktno ili indirektno, sa njom koja se sprijatelji sa mnom za potrebe bilo koje istrage u bilo kom momentu, ili tražeći dovoljno informacija da implicira, ali u stvari iz nehata i pogrešno implicira mene, u nedostatku dovoljno

informacija da me oslobodi, u vezi sa bilo kojim radnjama i/ili postojećim upućivanjem na vašu ili bilo koju agenciju u SAD-u, ili bilo koje osobe povezane sa takvim istragama, akcijama ili agencijama – koje utiču na moje beneficije socijalnog osiguranja na takav način da efikasno koriste službeno svojstvo da me dovedu pod jurisdikciju SAD-a, ili da se mešaju u moju slobodu kretanja ili bilo kako drugačije utiču na moje građanske slobode prema „R.I.C.O.“ kao kriminalna organizacija, ili pod bilo kojom drugom okolnošću povezanom sa prethodnim pasusima, uzrokuju neprikladan pregled mojeg dosijea socijalnog osiguranja što predstavlja maltretiranje i poteškoće u mom i životu članova moje porodice.

I zahtev da se Generalni inspektor za Ministarstvo pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država nezavisno raspita kod odgovarajućih vlasti u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj za bilo koje poznate činjenice istraga koje su možda vođene ili se vode u vezi sa bilo kojim/svim od prethodnog. Šaljem kao skrivenim primaocima (BCC) ovu komunikaciju dvojici advokata, jednom u SAD-u i jednom u Nemačkoj. Ovo NISU moji advokati. Kopiram njima zato što su odmereni ljudi za koje verujem da imaju najviše moguće etičke standarde i želim zapis ovog mejla u rukama trećih strana kojima verujem – što uključuje bilo koju zakonitu vlast, advokata ili drugu osobu kojoj mogu, po svom nahođenju, da dostave kopije ako naknadno odluče da je tako odgovarajuće.

S poštovanjem, Ronald Tomas Vest

Ovo pismo (iznad) nije odbio FBI mejl server, poslato je na, ali nije dugo prošlo pre što sam počeo da primam sledeći odgovor na mejlove koje sam slao FBI-u u Albukerkiju (ja sam, do tada, obaveštavao FBI o svojim aktivnostima).

Sledeće adrese imaju permanentne fatalne greške <> (razlog: 550 #5.1.0. adresa odbijena

Transkript sesije sledi …dok komunicira sa RCPT za: <<<>… Korisnik nepoznat

Ovo (prethodno) pokazuje da su moji mejlovi prethodno imali rutu do „Slivije Marufi“, koja izgleda da je sklonjena, a njena adresa u kancelariji u Albukerkiju otkazana ili promenjena.

U nepovezanom prigovoru u Federalnom sudu u Albukerkiju koje je postavljeno na internet od strane jedne stranke u maju 2009. godine, našao sam sledeću izjavu:

„.. situaciju preispituje Silvija MARUFI, FBI istražni analitičar“

Ovo jasno pokazuje na FBI agenta Sliviju Marufi kojoj je dodeljeno da me istražuje sve do momenta kada sam poslao pismo FBI kancelariji u Albukerkiju 18. februara 2009. godine, a Marufi je jasno bila „osoba od interesa“ vezana za uporne pokušaje ubistva (mene). Uzgred, FBI nikada nije priznao moje (imejlom poslato) pismo od 18. februara 2009. godine, iako je jasno da su primili ovu komunikaciju.


Živeo sam u Berlinu od septembra 2010. do jula 2012. godine. Od nekoliko incidenata tokom ovog perioda, ovaj se izdvaja:

Dok sam živeo u Šarlotenbergu (Berlin) tokom jula 2011. godine, imao sam svoje prvo iskustvo sa obaveštajnim agencijama koje su koristile prozelitističke evangeliste kao paravan za tim ubica. Razmišljao sam malo o tome da li su „Jevreji za Isusa“ bili MOSAD ili zajednički poduhvat MOSAD/CIA, ali za sada bih ostao pri MOSAD-u. Članak Vejna Madsena je ukazao da je CIA koristila misionare u prošlosti, posebno u Latinskoj Americi, ali su Jevreji za Isusa potpuno druga vrsta. U Berlinu niko neće zabadati nos u posao bilo kog Jevreja, to je savršen paravan (mora da MOSAD tako misli). Ovo je izgleda bio još jedan slučaj „quid pro quo“ (prethodna MOSAD-ova razmena je bio pokušaj na liniji U7 u Berlinu, 14. oktobra 2007. godine) ili kada obaveštajna agencija jedne nacije radi u ime obaveštajne agencije druge nacije, ovo nije uopšte neobično.

To je dvostruko slepo poricanje ugrađeno u operacije, evangelistički Hrišćani koji se predstavljaju kao Jevreji. Četiri od pet, ili možda devet od deset ovih takozvanih „Jevreja za Isusa“ su prevareni i nesumnjivi evangelisti koji jednostavno pokušavaju da ubede ljude da budu „spašeni“. Dovoze ih avionima širom sveta u smenama, gde dobrovoljno

rade kao misionari, i podobni su i pri ruci da idu u bilo koje područje gde treba da se dogodi operacija ubijanja.

Meta treba da se navikne da ih viđa u svojoj okolini i to je ono što treba da napravi ugodno okruženje misionarima, dok se vaše navike proučavaju, kojim U-Bahn (metroom) putujete i uobičajeno vreme. Kada se meta navikne i ignoriše „Jevreje za Isusa“, sa uspostavljenom rutinom, nesumnjivi, prozelitistički članovi se zamene sa timovima ubica iz MOSAD-a koji nose majice „Jevreji za Isusa“, i meta (teorija mora da se održava) neće primetiti da je označena kada ulazi u metro gde će „najnehrišćanskija“ otrovna igla, koja ne može lako da se vidi na sigurnosnim kamerama, ubodom izazvati srčani udar u gomili ljudi, i tako se još jedan pridruži ljudima koji padnu mrtvi od prirodnih uzroka svakog dana, to je tako jednostavno. Osim kada nije tako jednostavno, kada je meta svesna onoga šta se dešava, zato što je obaveštajna agencija glupa.

Kada se Amerikanci koji su doveženi avionom sa Biblijskog pojasa Srednjeg zapada zamene Izraelcima čije je generalno ponašanje, izrazi lica i govor tela od glave do pete drugačiji od prevarenih evangelista (koji ne bi trebalo da, na kraju krajeva, budu iznenađeni što će stvarni Jevreji biti uključeni u njihovu organizaciju), to neće propustiti niko mog nivoa obuke. Bilo je to u Šarlotenbergu, primetio sam dva Izraelca kako proučavaju moje navike, dok su Amerikanci pokrivali veće javno područje kuda sam često išao, nekoliko dana, a onda su Izraelci motrili na moj ulaz u U-Bahn. Ušao sam, ali umesto da idem dole na drugi nivo i da uzmem voz, izašao sam na drugom ulazu, kao da sam koristio U-Bahn stanicu kao metod da prođem raskrsnicu bez dodira sa semaforima iznad zemlje, dok sam posmatrao pratioce koje sam mogao da primetim i naravno… jedan visoki Izraelac u civilnoj odeći (nije imao majicu „Jevreji za Isusa“) je promenio smer i pojavio se iza mene, ali ja sam bio spreman na to i postavio sam se leđima prema zidu kod stola kafića na otvorenom, između ljudi koji su takođe bili okrenuti prema njemu, leđima prema zidu i nije mogao da me pogodi iglom, a da se ne oda. Potpuno pogrešno mesto sa gomilom ljudi je bila moja prednost, a ne njegova. Glupo je izučavao događaj jedan minut, oklevajući, krećući da pođe, ponovo zastajući da prouči, pitajući se šta da uradi, dok je očigledno

iziritiran odustao i otišao dok sam ja uporno i direktno gledao u njega, a on u mene.

U avgustu 2012. godine, preselio sam se u malo selo na jugu Nemačke.

Beleška 15) U avgustu 2011. godine, (REDIGOVANO), koji je uglavnom izgubio kontakt sa mnom nakon što sam mu dostavio staklenu kuglicu iz moje kape u Visbadenu da dostavi na analizu, i nakon toga kada sam mu dostavio inkriminišući dosije Badger-Two-Medicine, kontaktirao me je samo toliko da napravi izgovor o prekidu naše bliske saradnje (optužio me je da sam pisao „Mržnju“ upućujući na moje satirične eseje) koja je trajala skoro dvadeset godina. Moj utisak je da je (REDIGOVANO) izgubio živce.


U novembru 2012. godine, posetio sam Berlin i imao blizak susret sa potencijalnim ubicom na U7 metrou (treći U7 pokušaj tokom 5 godina) i ovaj incident je bio, kao u poslovici, kap koja je prelila čašu.

Do tog momenta, više od pet godina su domaće nemačke vlasti bile svesne i/ili pratile moju odiseju, a da nisu preduzele akciju da izvrše pravdu, nisu hapsile i nisu sudski gonile, pa sam shvatio da neće nikakva akcija biti preduzeta sve dok je ulizica SAD-u, konzervativna vlada, na vlasti u Nemačkoj. Nakon što sam neko vreme razmišljao o tome, odlučio sam da udarim na nemačku vladu. Razvio sam pravnu strategiju da isprovociram Nemačku na Međunarodnom kriminalnom sudu, za podsticanje i pomaganje SAD-u u zločinima za koje SAD ne mogu direktno da budu tužene zato što SAD ne pripadaju Rimskom statutu, koji je napravio taj sud. Takođe sam odlučio da proguram informacije o Hrišćanskom ekstremizmu u Pentagonu, pomoću materijala koji sam dobio u neformalnoj saradnji sa Fondacijom za vojnu versku slobodu (od juna 2008. godine), o nemačkim parlamentarcima, zajedno sa obilnim anti-semitskim mejlom punim mržnje usmerenim protiv fondacije, koji mi je dao Majki Vajnstajn, predsednik MRFF (Fondacije za vojnu versku slobodu). Ovi napori su počeli iz mog skrovišta u južnoj Nemačkoj, 2013. godine.

Beleška 16) Prema izveštaju o istraživanju Vašington posta iz 2011. godine, „nekih 1 271 vladina organizacija i 1 931 privatna kompanija rade

na programima povezanim sa protivterorizmom, državnom bezbednošću i obaveštajnim radom na oko 10 000 lokacija širom Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Procena je da ok 854 000 ljudi, skoro jedan i po put više nego što Vašington D.C. ima stanovnika, imaju bezbednosna odobrenja najvišeg nivoa.“

Ovo je podržao članak na „Hiljade tehnoloških, finansijskih i proizvodnih kompanija radi blisko sa agencijama za nacionalnu bezbednost SAD-a, pružaju osetljive informacije i zauzvrat primaju beneficije koje uključuju pristup poverljivim, obaveštajnim podacima, reklo je četvoro ljudi koji su upoznati sa procesom. Ovi programi, čiji su učesnici poznati kao partneri od poverenja, sežu daleko izvan onoga što je otkrio Edvard Snouden, računarski tehničar koji je obavljao posao za Nacionalnu bezbednosnu agenciju“.

Dodatno, nadzorni organ Kongresa SAD-a, GAO (Vladina računovodstvena kancelarija), izveštava kao rezultat manjkavih podataka, obaveštajne agencije SAD-a: „nisu dobro pozicionirane da procene potencijalne efekte oslanjanja na osoblje ugovarača“

I onda, jedan oficir vojne obaveštajne agencije SAD-a je izjavio za Buzzfeed: „Mislim da ako bismo imali šansu, veoma brzo bismo to završili.“ [Obaveštajna služba SAD-a bi želela da nađe Snoudena]. „Ležerno se šeta ulicama Moskve, vraćajući se iz nabavke namirnica. Vraćajući se u svoj stan, slučajno ga ubode prolaznik. Misli da to nije ništa, kada posle nekog vremena počne da se oseća pomalo ošamućeno, i misli da je to parazit iz lokalne vode. Ode kući potpuno bezbrižno i sledeća stvar koju saznate je da je umro pod tušem“.

U stvari, većina nenavedenih događaja (u ovoj hronologiji) koje sam doživeo su imali veze sa uhodama, čije je ponašanje profilisano za akciju, kao što je opisano u prethodnom pasusu.

Ovo ukazuje na apsolutnu korupciju američke obaveštajne službe, gde korumpirani Pentagon, koji je bacio vladavinu prava kroz prozor, i povezane korumpirane korporativne ličnosti (npr. Hrišćanski ekstremisti Kondoliza Rajs i bivši vrhovni komandant NATO-a i Obamin savetnik za nacionalnu bezbednost general Džejms Džouns, u saradnji sa ŠEVRONOM) mogu da pristupe tajnom materijalu preko Pentagonske

NSA (Agencija za nacionalnu bezbednost) suštinski u bilo koju svrhu koju žele, sve do i uključujući i ubistvo.


2013. godina je bila uglavnom mirna, u vezi sa pokušajima mog ubistva, radio sam iz svoje sigurne kuće u južnoj Nemačkoj. Uspeo sam da podnesem tužbu kod Međunarodnog kriminalnog suda protiv Nemačke (trenutno na čekanju, jer je sud tražio dodatne informacije) i započeo sam kampanju da edukujem nemačke parlamentarce o hrišćanskom ekstremizmu koji vodi Pentagon, a koji inficira NATO. U septembru 2013. godine, preselio sam se u Lajpcig. U decembru 2013. godine sam otišao iz Nemačke da živim sa svojom devojkom u (REDIGOVANO). Prijavili smo se da živimo zajedno i tri nedelje kasnije, uručen mi je nalog Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova o proterivanju iz države. Nalog je bio na snazi širom Evropske Unije, i kao posledica toga, bio sam pod svakodnevnom pretnjom deportacije u SAD. Krajnje je nemoralno da me prisiljavaju da tražim politički azil u ovim okolnostima, ali u stvari to je tačno ono što može da bude potrebno u ovoj stalnoj lakrdiji od pravde, u kojoj su pravne institucije odbile da krenu protiv kriminalaca koje sam izložio vlastima.


Rezultat onoga što sam nazvao „alfa“ istragom je jasan.

Korporativni organizovani kriminal u vojno-industrijskom kompleksu u dosluhu sa institucijama u NATO-u i odmetnutim elementima u obaveštajnim agencijama (sa izvan orvelovskim obrtom kada je ubačen „Hrišćanski dominionizam“), zajedno formiraju jednu međunarodnu „duboku državu“ koja je posvećena subverziji i eventualnom svrgavanju i/ili kontroli zapadnih demokratskih institucija. Nemačka vlada i organi za sprovođenje zakona su sada potpuno svesni „alfa“ elemenata koji su operisali izvan parametara zakona u Nemačkoj. Uzgred, alfina operaciona komanda i kontrola smeštena u SAD-u je zastrašila nemački politički establišment na najvišim nivoima.

Sa nemačkom vladom, dobro upoznatom sa svim neophodnim činjenicama u vezi sa „alfom“, od policije na lokalnom nivou do glavnih političara u Nemačkoj, zaista postoji još malo stvari koje mogu da se

postignu. „Alfin“ istražni rezultat se ne može gurati pod tepih doveka, previše ljudi sada zna šta se dešava i na kraju, ja imam malo kontrole nad tim kada će to izaći na videlo ili kako će se razvijati kasnije. Ovo će imati veze sa preostalim institucijama u vezi sa vladavinom prava koje još nisu preuzete od strane kriminalne organizacije iza „alfe“. Nepobitna je odgovornost ovih institucija da poguraju napred informacije koje su iznete i okružuju „alfu“; u pravcu ponovnog uspostavljanja autentičnog ustavnog poretka.

Beleška 17) U Nemačkoj, gde nema oklevanja da se hapse i sudski gone islamističke terorističke ćelije, čvrsto rešene da izvrše zaveru za ubistvo, pet uzastopnih nemačkih ministara unutrašnjih poslova nisu uspeli da deluju protiv istog ponašanja kada se ono vrši od strane ili u ime hrišćanskih ekstremista u američkim obaveštajnim službama i povezanih korumpiranih ličnosti koje vrše zločine na nemačkom tlu. Ti nemački ministri unutrašnjih poslova, po redu svog nameštenja u ministarstvu su:

Wolfgang Schäuble, 22. novembar 2005. do 28. oktobra 2009. Thomas de Maizière, 28. oktobar 2009. do 3. marta 2011. Hans-Peter Friedrich, 3. mart 2011. do 17. decembra 2013. Thomas de Maizière, 17. decembar 2013. do 14. marta 2018. Horst Seehofer, 14. mart 2018. do sada.

Post scriptum beleška bi bila da su se slučaj svete zemlje Blekfita iz Montane i čarter škole Ist Mauntin u Novom Meksiku desili uporedo, a na kraju su bili konvergentni; ukrštajući zajedničke ili povezane interese u vojno-industrijskom kompleksu.

Ronald Tomas Vest, maj 2021.


Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

“The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

Think about it for just a moment. The quote is 1,900 years old.

Western culture is a history of empires, preceding the Greeks of Alexander by millennia. But now, this cycle is finally exhausted in the 21st Century where colonialism, proselytizing, and seduction (consumerism) have overtaken the world but exposed the fallacy of sustained economic development (empire enabled growth of private fortunes) through conquest. There’s nothing left to exploit, nowhere else to go.

But the patrician (oligarchs) appetite for wealth hasn’t ceased. So they’ve been increasingly turning on their own people to sate their (insatiable) appetites. In the abstract, this is nothing short of cultural cannibalism.

Like big fish eating little fish of the same species, of too many examples of this necrotic cultural phenomenon of modern Western civilization’s cannibalism to list, we’ll go to the recent, largest scale ever, ‘dining out’ so aptly anticipated in 1968 by George Harrison:

Everywhere there’s lots of piggies living piggy lives
You can see them out for dinner with their piggy wives
Clutching forks and knives to eat their bacon

That’s what’s going on with Big Pharma & Covid; and the straw man argument of whether to open up (waive) the covid vaccine patents. Oligarch Bill Gates both 1) opposes (together with Angela Merkel) violating the ‘intellectual property rights’ of corporations that if ‘waived’ would see any competent pharmaceutical lab in the world begin to manufacture covid vaccines. But some of the politicians (e.g. Joe Biden or whoever is standing in for his dementia on any given day) are becoming uncomfortable over the issue of Big Pharma vaccine patents making ungodly amounts of money as they (the politicians) bungle handling the pandemic with its politicized ‘medicine’ (e.g. Dr ‘Faustus’ Fauci.) All of this preceding is a straw man argument foisted on a panicked public.

“We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic”

Meanwhile, going to the real issue, recalling Oligarch Bill Gates is the second largest donor to the World Health Organization (Gates’ foundation is the largest WHO donor after the USA) and the World Health Organization has refused approval of an effective, cheap, generic drug, Ivermectin, as a treatment for covid that should render the vaccination hysteria moot (stamp the pandemic out), look at these six graphs:

Ivermectin in Czech Republic:

Ivermectin in Slovakia

Ivermectin in Mexico:

Ivermectin in Panama:

Ivermectin in Peru:

Ivermectin in Delhi:

“The West, as I thought of it extending thousands of miles beyond the setting sun, was astonishing in its corruption, in its desire for death, and in its complacency towards its disease” -Cicily Isabel Fairfield

updated 17 July 2021

Part one HERE                                                      Čitajte na srpskom

In part one the reader was introduced to psyops (psychological operations) in its ‘civilian’ form (pioneered by Edward Bernays based on his uncle Sigmund Freud’s principles) euphemistically renamed ‘public relations’ or, the corporate form of applying propaganda to the consumer; little different to intelligence agencies targeting populations of hostile states with disinformation. Each approach, whether ‘civilian’ or military, seeks to manipulate a populace away from their self interest (even survival) to the benefit of the propaganda’s perpetrators. Having seen (in part one) the greed of western corporate oligarchs operates within a system essentially ‘legalizing’ what could amount to state sponsored murder with impunity, or shortly restated; allows for a ‘state of emergency’ to authorize use of unstudied, experimental drug that is very expensive,  Bamlanivimab, on an unsuspecting populace in lieu of a known to be safe, proving to be effective and inexpensive drug, ivermectin, to treat covid, with the latter suppressed in corporate media. Now, we will look at the present ‘public relations’ (psyops) that point to disinformation relevant to vaccines (or so-called vaccines.)

Semantics & Splitting Hairs

What is a vaccine? Traditionally, a vaccine refers to employ of ‘inactivated’ (dead) virus to stimulate an immune response. The Chinese covid vaccine is based on this methodology, as were many years (decades) of flu shots. This method allows the immune system to do its job naturally.

What is gene therapy? For the past two decades, gene therapy refers tinkering with the genetic material itself, including mRNA. But Moderna denies its anti-covid therapy employing mRNA is gene therapy:

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Moderna website: “Gene therapy and gene editing alter the original genetic information each cell carries. The goal is to produce a permanent fix to the underlying genetic problem by changing the defective gene. Moderna is taking a different approach to address the underlying cause of MMA and other diseases. mRNA transfers the instructions stored in DNA to make the proteins required in every living cell. Our approach aims to help the body make its own missing or defective protein. Unlike gene editing and gene therapy, mRNA technology does not change the genetic information of the cell” [1]

Well, Moderna lied. Not about the technique but the fact that mRNA research has fallen under the rubric of “gene therapy” for decades, as demonstrated at the National Institute of Health library in a plethora of research papers:

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the National Institute of Health website: “Synthetic messenger RNA [mRNA] as a tool for gene therapy” [2]

What the Moderna psyops people want you to think (when disingenuously narrowing the definition of gene therapy) is, because they are not modifying the DNA, where the actual genes are located, it is not gene therapy. But guess what? RNA is also genetic material with significance when it is subjected to corporate scientific (greed driven) monkey business.

The imperfect (but adequate) analogy would be DNA comprises the headquarters issuing instructions intended to build certain structures. mRNA is the courier delivering the DNA blueprint to the construction site. What mRNA “gene therapy” accomplishes is, it swaps the blueprint little different to if you’d sent instructions via a courier service but the instructions you’d sent are not what arrived at the intended destination because someone in the courier service had substituted the original with an altered set of instructions. In the case of the Moderna covid gene therapy (it is NOT a vaccine in any sense of what ‘vaccine’ meant prior to covid) the problem is (again, as in the case of Bamlanivimab in part one) this therapy has been ‘fast tracked’ and employed under emergency powers that forego the normal required studies that law would require prior to approval. In short, the long term health implications for the people receiving this therapy is unknown or restated, psychopath (greed driven) corporate lobbyists ($) have bought, convinced or otherwise subverted institutions to a point the common citizens are little different to lab rats.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Popular Mechanics website: “After a remarkably accelerated development period, two experimental COVID-19 (coronavirus) vaccines are almost ready for primetime. Both use a technology called messenger RNA (mRNA), which has been studied and experimented with for decades in different forms, but has never been used in a commercial vaccine” [3]

Note the terminology “accelerated development”, “experimental” and “never been used.” In short other words, inadequately studied and only authorized for the fact of a ‘state of emergency.’

Screenshot of the “Emergency Use Authorizations” for Moderna & Pfizer mRNA injections at the USA’s Food & Drug Administration website [4]

Following on part one (the suppression of an effective, cheap anti-covid drug, ivermectin, while promoting an unstudied, experimental drug, Bamlanivimab), in this follow on part two, it becomes clear promoting human health and rapid recovery is not the primary objective of the institutions charged with containing the so-called “pandemic.” In fact, it would appear transcendent corruption is treading a path towards a state of biological terror waged by the Western governments on its own citizens in absence of any practice of ethical self restraint that should have 1) employed ivermectin as a safe, cheap and effective covid cure and 2) developed a classic vaccine, with proven safe method based on ‘inactivated’ (dead) virus as the Chinese had done. Meanwhile, let’s hope the Chinese act responsibly in further research efforts when considering mRNA gene therapy. [5], [6], [7], [8]

Follow the Money

In whose interest is using the national body of citizens as lab rats?

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the American Broadcasting Corporation website: “Gates, who had invested in the vaccine technology in 2015, emphasized the importance of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines ending this pandemic and potentially ones to come in the future” [9]

Bill Gates is hardly a molecular scientist. What Bill Gates actually is, is a narcissist. Does Bill Gates understand that mRNA is experimental, understudied technique, that quite possibly could prove to be anything but beneficial to human health over long term? A narcissist won’t entertain the question. But the matter of fact is, Bill Gates is playing God with his wealth buying influence determining covid policy on a global scale in circumstance of demanding employ of experimental, understudied and/or untested remedies that can only be approved with emergency authorizations because they are NOT proven safe.

World Health Organization illustration (screenshot) showing the Gates Foundation is the WHO’s 2nd largest provider of funds (after the USA) in 2018-2019, the Gates’ contribution exceeding USD $500,000,000 for the period. [10], [11]

Lies by Omission

Meanwhile, in Serbia, media remaining silent on the effectiveness of ivermectin while the use of the experimental Bamlanivimab is allowed without warning of its unstudied/untested status (this author had emailed this information to several English language Serbian news outlets with no acknowledgement or reply), and where there is no exam of the experimental nature of the mRNA anti-covid injection, also allowed in Serbia, there appears to be an element of rank hypocrisy when the authority is threatening imprisonment for ‘fake news’ concerning vaccinations when the state itself is withholding information the citizens should require to make informed decisions; because it is truly disseminating fake news to allow citizens the impression mRNA ‘vaccines’ (gene therapies) are safe.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from Telegraf website: “Both [Minister of Justice Maja Popovic and Minister of Health Zlatibor Loncar]
referred to the Criminal Code, which in Article 343 stipulates that anyone who, by presenting or transmitting false news or allegations, causes panic or serious disturbance of public order or peace or thwarts or significantly impedes implementation of decisions and measures of state bodies or organizations exercising public authority, shall be punished by imprisonment of between three months and three years, and with a fine” [12]

In light of the preceding, we should close with a dry observation; criminal negligence is demonstrated throughout the institutions charged with containing corona virus (on a global scale.) Whether due to corporate psyops (propaganda) manipulating narcissism in a state of greed driven political expediency or preying upon incompetence, transcendent corruption is the (above the law) corporate-coopted-corrupted state’s exercise of impunity. Who’s to panic? Leadership in a state of exposure?

“Truth is suppressed, not to protect the country from enemy agents but to protect the Government against the people” -Roy Hattersley















A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

Since the days of Edward Bernays adapting his uncle Sigmund Freud’s psychological principles to propaganda (euphemistically renamed ‘public relations’) for purpose of corporate advertising, the world’s populace has been exposed to what the intelligence agencies refer to as ‘psyops’ or “psychological operations.” In certain circumstance these operations are carefully designed to be supported by politicians in the intelligence agency sense of ‘backstopped’ or restated: Lying to the public requires unethical ‘convincing’ (lying to) a nation’s leadership to accomplish certain (greed driven) marketing objectives. Furthermore, this ‘culture’ can easily reflect what rogue CIA officer Phillip Agee had noted becomes a social-environmental phenomenon:

“You get so used to lying that, after awhile, it’s hard to remember what the truth is.” 

In short other words, capitalism’s lobbyist (public relations) infection creates a social-cultural environment where ‘truth’ becomes a ‘relative’ or incidental, accidental, or oftentimes, a deliberately concealed (depending on the level of awareness within the hierarchy) thing with little bearing on what has become a plasticized, or artificial, reality for the targets of larger psyops (populations.) [1]

The ‘psyops’ or psychology integrated to lobbyists’ presentations prepared for politicians are actually a necessary ‘pre-psyop’ to accomplish the larger psyops goal of manipulating a populace to ‘buy’ and it goes something like this hypothetical analysis of what is recently happening in Serbia:

“Patients … have started receiving a new drug against Covid-19, Bamlanivimab, which prevents further spread of the infection, that is, the progression of the disease from mild to severe…” [2]

Nowhere in this news presented at the Serbian media site is there any mention that

1) Bamlanivimab is an experimental drug that had been initially authorized for use against covid in the USA in December 2020 only because of a state of emergency; the drug has not been put through the necessary studies and medical trial procedures the law would normally require to protect the consumers.

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from “It is not yet known if Bamlanivimab is a safe and effective treatment for any condition” [3]

2) Ivermectin, a cheap, generic drug, with a safety track record of 50 years use, had been shown in laboratory testing (April 2020 or a full year ago) to kill 99.8% of the covid 19 virus in 24 hours, but this medical fact is practically unknown to the Serbian medical community. Why?

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from “The trials so far have shown ivermectin reduces the number of cell-associated viral RNA by 99.8 % in 24 hours” [4]

3) Following the (dated April 2020 in the above screenshot) ivermectin lab test result on covid, this drug was used in Peru and there was a DRAMATIC DROP in covid deaths, that is until there was a change in political administration and the use of ivermectin had been restricted, which saw a DRAMATIC HIKE in covid deaths [5]

4) Demand from top health professionals across the world pushing data at the World Health Organization to attempt authorizing the use of ivermectin merely elicits a promise of a ‘probe’, no matter the existing positive result indicated in multiple trails comes from some of the top specialists in the world (as government institutions like the USA’s Federal Food & Drug Administration drag their feet and demand large, time consuming studies)

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from an MSN article on World Health Organization & ivermectin: American pulmonary and critical care specialist Pierre Kory, president of the Front-Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – a group of critical care specialists and published academic authors developing treatment protocols to prevent the transmission of Covid-19: “It is certainly another tool in the toolkit and we need everything we can to go after this pandemic. It’s not that I think that Ivermectin can help people. I know it helps people. The data is unmistakable and consistent. It shows quicker time to viral clearance, lower viral loads, faster times to recovery and lowered mortality rates” [6]

5) So, we have gone from “It is not yet known if Bamlanivimab is a safe and effective treatment for any condition” to the suppression of a known to be safe (fifty years) drug that is shown to beat covid. Why? A cheap generic drug (ivermectin) that is effective doesn’t make Eli Lilly (big pharma) money. The price of a experimental drug Bamlanivimab dose for covid? USD $1,250.

The price for an effective against covid dose of ivermectin? Over 95% less than Bamlanivimab

Yet Bamlanivimab is the national governments (not only in USA but following the USA’s lead) covid treatment of choice, even as the USA’s National Institute of Health allows (if not endorses) ivermectin as a covid treatment due to overwhelming pressure from medical professionals [7]

Highlighted in the illustration (screenshot) from the Blitz news site: “Safe, inexpensive, widely available, with a decades-long track record, and even a Nobel Prize attached to it, the drug recently cleared National Institute of Health (NIH) hurdles to be an allowed treatment for Covid-19. Frontline doctors using the drug to great success argue it needs to be adopted widely and rapidly”

“Transcendent Corruption” is legal but unethical and immoral gains that exacts a social price up to, and is inclusive of, unnecessary suffering and death. It is in a sense legalized murder with impunity. It works like this: ‘science’ is presented to politicians by psyops (public relations) trained parties in a culture of political lies where lobbyists simply point to the USA ‘approving’ (not mentioning under emergency powers, forgoing safety studies) the unproven, experimental drug Bamlanivimab and altogether remain silent on ivermectin. Because the politicians are dependent on the lobbyists money and associated power, whether in ‘legal’ form of donation (transcendent corruption’s method of bribe) or other forms of enrichment such as investment, they simply accept the lobbyists’ word and Eli Lilly (big pharma’s player in this case) makes immense amounts of money with a dice throw on the common citizens backs; where the citizens not only pay the outrageous sum for the unproven medicine with taxes, the citizens will, in the absence of safety studies, perhaps pay in future with their literal lives. In the case someone brings up ivermectin as a plausible alternative, the lobbyists will point to the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (or other governments & agencies) recommending against its use, as well the World Health Organization having not yet approved ivermectin’s use, and fail to mention the USA’s National Institute of Health allows the use of ivermectin and the many positive reviews for this safe, cheap drug in treating covid by medical professionals across the world.

Relevant to the preceding, in Serbia, Transcendent Corruption in media takes a twofold track; neither of which is good for the common people. 1) the ‘regime’ is attacked as corrupt by those Western style media outlets characterized as ‘opposition’ but in fact are funded by a ‘who’s who’ of color revolution instigators such as Soros, and the many usual suspects fronting for Western intelligence agencies, such as the several organizations functioning under the ‘umbrella’ (‘whorehouse’ would be the better noun) of USAID. Predictably, there should be little interest in raising awareness concerning ivermectin in these ‘opposition’ media venues pushing agendas for Western corporate capitalism and its oligarch minions, in this case, those associated with big pharma. 2) There will be little motivation for the ‘regime’ to correct its mistakes in a sea of political lies and raise awareness concerning ivermectin; where in circumstance of  Transcendent Corruption, with a psyops (public relations) assist, the principal leaders assume a posture of (self) denial of the actual facts; the regime’s politicians will have actually convinced themselves they are doing what is good for the people (authorize Bamlanivimab) and state controlled media will not bite the hand that feeds them. This is cumulative result of psyops preying upon a frailty of human psychology per the observation of Thucydides 2,500 years past:

“It is the habit of mankind to entrust to careless hope what they long for, and to use sovereign reason to thrust aside what they would prefer not to examine”


Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part two


Related: Covid 19 (scientific counter-narratives)










A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

“…It is also clear that the overall death rate in 2020 was exceeded by the five years of 1999-2003. I need to define the death rate here, as it is based on the deaths per thousand people, which eliminates the fact that populations were lower in earlier years. It’s a given that larger population might have a higher death total from a given disease, but not a higher death rate. Diseases work on the susceptible individuals of a population and, thus, it is a proportion of the population that becomes ill or dies.

“That said, how does the death rate in the UK for 2020 compare to previous years? It is clear that the death rate in the UK for 2020 was not exceptional compared to previous years. How can that be? If you have Covid-19 as well as influenza killing people, what is going on? An observation has been made that, for some mysterious reason, influenza, as of April in the US, dropped to zero and continues at zero in the latest flu season.

“In light of the apparent missing influenza, claims have been made that masking, distancing, and lockdowns were completely effective against influenza, but then there is no talk about its failure in stopping Covid-19, which is a virus of the same size and transmission mode.

“Then, we are told that Covid is still around because people are not masking and such properly, which means influenza should also still be around in the US. Since these are infectious viruses, how can these restrictions be effective against one virus and not the other? It does not make sense.

“It is also easy to find that US states with strict mandates have the same rates of PCR-positive cases as those who do not. The conjecture can be made that influenza cases are largely reported as Covid-19, based either on a positive PCR test result or on symptoms alone.

“In the US, it is clear that there has been a monetary incentive for diagnosing the disease and encouraging hospitalizations. The cessation of other medical procedures and tests during this period clearly is going to lead to increased overall deaths. The fact that there appears to be no excess deaths despite this, indicates that the C-19 virus itself was not as lethal as they claim.

“Overall, the death rate in the UK is not out of line with the normal death rates from other years and clearly not close to the highest in the last 22 years. It is difficult to consider influenza deaths when there appears to be a bias toward categorizing influenza and other causes as Covid-19 deaths.

“Every year and, for that matter, all year long, there is a population of health-critical individuals who may be overwhelmed by a flu-like illness and open to pneumonia complications. The questionable Covid-19 PCR test appears to be keeping the presence of Covid-19 alive, possibly detecting viruses of the current flu season.

“The WHO is now admitting that that this test can be 97% false positives or more, with higher processing cycle numbers. The argument could be made that we have an epidemic of [false positive] testing…”

Or so says PhD biologist Banson Wilcot at ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International. [1]

So, I looked up several references not related to the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site itself on the subject of how the ‘flu vanished’ and Wilcot seems to spot on.

Why? I was trying to make sense of Covid numbers in Serbia (that don’t make sense) and Wilcot’s was the first article I’d come across that addressed the issue in a sensible way. Specifically, I wanted to know how a vicious pathogen (Covid) could justify pandemic “measures” when the national mortality rate for the year 2020 hadn’t spiked (at all) in comparison to previous years:

Graph: Serbia’s death rate has been flat at 13.2 deaths average per 1,000 for the past four years; 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2020. [2]

The ‘fringe conspiracy’ site then caused me to look at other statistics to establish (or disestablish) its veracity while casting a wider net to see what is going on elsewhere in comparison to Serbia and violà! The so-called ‘progressive’ site VOX News supports two points made by ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot:

1) Flu has virtually vanished in the USA (VOX graph credit to Center for Disease Control and Prevention) for the 2020-2021 statistical season &  2) the VOX article upholds the oxymoron pointed out by Wilcot; crediting masks for the ‘historic’ low level of flu in the same environment where masks have NOT halted the spread of Covid, a disease spread by identical method. Clearly, someone is not being honest concerning the ‘vanished flu’ phenomenon and it would appear that dishonest someone is VOX and is NOT ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot. [3]

Now, for some initial perspective on what certainly appear to be grossly inflated figures ascribed to Covid in the USA with highly unreliable PCR tests as well as forgoing tests for other pathogens (includes the vanished flu and likely many tens of thousands of deaths by other pathogens and related underlying cause such as frail health or any other reason wrongly attributed to Covid.) [4]

If we take the roughly 500,000 deaths ‘attributed’ to Covid in the USA and apply that as a percentage to the USA population of about 330 million for the 2020-2021 season, Americans arrived at sacrificing their civil liberties for a 0.15% gross population Covid death rate that relies on severely inflated (official) Covid numbers incorporating the missing flu and untold other causes of death such as stress related deaths due to underlying health issues aggravated by lock-downs, Covid related policies pushing people into poverty & higher mortality, America’s staggering problem with obesity (Covid kills obese people in high numbers), attrition in America’s exploding homeless population et cetera. These numbers won’t be properly sorted before years of study but in the meanwhile a highly politicized (Dr ‘Faustus’ driven) Covid panic-power grab dishonestly lumps everything together. Bolstering Wilcot’s account:

I still can’t find 500,000 excess deaths caused by Covid in 2020; they’re simply not there among the diseases the CDC reported out and since the base risk is 1/50,000 even across half the population being infected we could only account for 3,000 deaths. It is thus clear that if in fact Covid-19 has killed anywhere near the number of people claimed those other morbid conditions, all of which are serious diseases standing alone, have to account for the increase between them. Indeed the most-common, by far (40% of additional deaths by disease) were due to heart attacks and the next was diabetes at 13%. Between diabetes and heart attacks, both almost-exclusively due to lifestyle choices and thus your personal decisions, 53% of the excess 120,475 deaths are accounted for. If we add in strokes, which also are largely lifestyle-related then we’re at about 2/3rds.

Among those diseases that are allegedly “the biggest comorbid factors” I can find only 120,475 more deaths that Covid-19 may have contributed to and which included those diseases as a causal factor in total. Did Covid-19 cause all of those 120,000 additional deaths or were they caused by, in the case of diabetes, strokes and heart attacks for example, the additional 50lbs that a material percentage of people put on during the lockdowns (and over 20lbs on average!) from eating takeout trash full of fast carbs and being involuntarily cooped up in their homes? We do not know so this can only describe an upper boundary or caused mortality — not a lower one. This analysis doesn’t mean even more people didn’t die with Covid, but an alleged “Covid” death that wasn’t accompanied by one of the CDC’s specifically-called out diseases” (maybe those 500,000 USA covid deaths don’t actually exist: 24 April 2021 update, read it HERE)

As pointed out by Wilcot, the official USA numbers (that don’t add up) are consistent with what is observed in the United Kingdom’s data. It should be expected this will be the case elsewhere.

Back to Serbia:

If we take the ‘official’ Covid death rate 0.9% or 4,700 deaths (necessarily includes the ‘missing’ flu and other untold manner of death) and rather than apply this to what should be called ‘the includes false positives aggregate’ or 516,000 (reported positives) and instead apply this official death statistic (4,700) attributed to Covid to the 8,700,000 population of Serbia as whole (includes untested & tested negative) to arrive at 0.05%, it is only then a flat national death rate (no significant statistical increase) for the ‘pandemic’ year 2020 begins to make sense because it is only then we can understand what happened to the ‘missing’ flu and other, untold manner of death. They’ve been folded into the Covid statistic. There is no other straightforward explanation. [5]

Now that ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Banson Wilcot PhD is vindicated, let’s shortly note one other article at the ‘offending’ site Principia Scientific International on Covid: the article by another PhD (psychology), Dr Elsa Schieder, on Ivermectin. In short, she simply states what is known to be a scientifically established fact; Ivermectin cures Covid, except in those states that suppress this information about an effective, generic (cheap) drug that should render the vaccine hysteria moot. [6], [7]

The inescapable conclusion is that Covid, although real, and in some cases deadly, is not nearly so lethal on a societal-wide basis as it is presented to us, and need not be nearly so lethal as it presently is. The obvious question is why?

Social Analysis

Firstly, in Western cultures particularly, people lie to themselves, especially when it comes to pecuniary interests versus altruism. There is big money in addressing Covid as a (blown out of proportion) ‘pandemic’ and self importance takes on altruism as a lie (self deceit of doing the right thing) when in fact it is the pecuniary interests (money is power) driving the urge to control. So, the Covid ‘pandemic’ is not as much a conspiracy to control populations (even as strategies are devised to do this) as much as it is a self-importance inflating, power driven meme.

Western style politicians (taking bait from the sociopath oligarchs fishing for them with lobbyists) are narcissists, and narcissists are those personality constructs which are most prone to self deceits. In lay terms, it should be said our leaders are self-aggrandizing morons incapable of comprehending the damage they are causing is by far worse than the damage which should happen if they were to step out of the way, stop politicizing medicine and let the community doctors do their job with a full set of Covid facts available to them (e.g. treat with Ivermectin.)

Insofar as the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International, well, in fact it harbors an Islamophobe associated personality like the Dr Elsa Schieder mentioned above, who it just happens provided accurate information on Ivermectin, together with any number of other trained scientists who do not (for whatever reasons) find a place in mainstream to have a voice. What does it say about Western culture when searching for the better information, one finds it at a site that is not entirely wholesome? How is that somehow more damning than the Western media lies we are fed every day by corporate entities protecting the interests of Western oligarchs and their corrupt self (and societal-wide) political deceits concerning Covid, leading to unnecessary loss of life?









A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

When greed supersedes racism, suddenly, ‘everyone is a nigger.’ Trump’s manipulated ‘white trash’ or ‘crackers’ had failed to understand it is identical underlying force, greed, and greed’s attending model of exploitation, had been the origin of chattel slavery that now underwrites the collapse of the blue collar, white middle class. We shouldn’t blame Trump for creating the conditions creating a new class of honky crackers (globalism did that) but certainly Trump exploited their ‘hope’ when he surrounded himself with world class criminal sociopaths on the extreme right of the 1% (the 2019 Trump cabinet included 17 millionaires, 2 one hundred million plus millionaires and 1 billionaire; altogether worth $3.2 billion.) Any expectation this crew would have sacrificed any portion of their fortunes (via profit losses) by reinvesting in the USA rather than cheap, outsourced labor, is fantasy par excellence. We’re all ‘niggers’ now, not to mention ‘useless eaters.’

What has manifest since Bill Clinton deregulated the American economy is a form of 21st Century slavery that doesn’t give a damn for the color of your skin and it doesn’t matter to any of the 1% whether your ‘master’ is on the left or right. Just don’t hurt the bottom line (profit) because the underlying motive is ‘all you stupid white niggers, if the global 1% can get you all fighting with (the dumber than fuck) antifa, as well as hating blacks, Mexicans, kulaks and chinks, we’ll never have to worry about y’all getting together to throw us out.’ So, listen up, whitey, here’s the what and how behind the modern rendition of what’s happening to you, with a relevant thumbnail history:

When America’s ‘European morality’ had ‘matured’ and the abolition of slavery became a political expediency of Abraham Lincoln…

“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that”

…following the war which ‘saved the union’, ’emancipation’ was morphed into 100 years of ‘Jim Crow era’ where freed slaves and their descendants were denied voting rights and were literally “barbecued” or lynched after having been tortured to death, sometimes burned alive or dragged to death, with large attending crowds photographed with the dead  victims at these events made into postcards that were delivered by the United States Postal Service.

In fact Lincoln (and his successors) didn’t give a rat’s ass for the civil rights of blacks, he just wanted (and did) what was necessary to keep his political power intact while serving an industrialized North with it’s own system of chattel exploitation (keep reading.)

Abandoning their ’40 acres and a mule’ (a sort of compensation towards a ‘new’ post-slavery life) in droves, over six million blacks fled the South’s ‘crackermania’, migrating to cities in the West and North of the USA where they took the bait of the industrial corporations offers of factory work; that is, until the factories were no longer profitable and the corporations abandoned these communities to their own devices with little opportunity at community advancement or even sustaining what they’d gained in the short term. Locked into a subsequent social prejudice driven poverty with menial labor afforded to the LUCKY ONES, that’s the short history leading to America’s ‘black slums.’ Nobody with the political power to repair this actually gave a damn, they were all bought then, little different to now.

That’s the principle, in short, of what drives today’s globalism and makes everyone poor, regardless of color of skin. Corporations have taken their capital out of America’s communities to invest in cheaper labor abroad and the white working class is collapsing into the same poverty that had been the experience of the black communities previous to this. Now, how’s it feel to be the ‘nigger’? And it doesn’t stop there, because when they decide you’re too much burden, or think you’re becoming ‘uppity’, they’ll ‘barbecue’ you too (little different to any hellfire missile launched outside the empire’s “homeland”)

Maybe, just maybe, whitey, y’all should look at setting some history aside and begin negotiating some détente and political alliances with black people in the lower middle class communities you should be grateful hadn’t adopted the attitude of ‘the only good cracker is a dead cracker.’ From there alliances might be bridged deeper into those ghettos with a seething anger at what had happened to them and what is now happening to you. Nobody has to be in love, only reasoned, civil and fair.

The concluding reality is, if the 1% are Sneetches decorated with stars, and Trump is a Sneetch with a star, what Trump actually promised you, that is recovering the short lived ‘golden age’ of the white America of the 1950s, that horse has bolted the barn. It ain’t coming back and the Sneetches with stars who stole it from you aren’t going to share the wealth because criminals don’t voluntarily surrender their business models. Whatever opportunities might exist aren’t going to manifest from nostalgia; and they won’t manifest at all so long as the filthy rich can keep you all hating, divided and fighting from a stance of ignorance.

A closing note would be to the crackers’ adversaries, that is libtards in general, Black Lives Matter (shouldn’t all life matter?) and antifa; insofar as the one percent millionaire and de facto President Harris using you like the idiots you are, you’re dumber than this cracker portrayed wondering at a life in a world that never did exist and never will exist:

She’s an incarceration queen chosen by corporate boards to protect their wealth from you, anyone and everyone, end of story. Maybe all you libtards should look at opening a dialogue with the ‘crackers’ … because if you were actually ‘woke’ you’d understand we’re all niggers now.


Some serious reading:






Čitajte na srpskom

Facebook, Twitter & Youtube (the ‘big boys’), all playing gatekeeper:

“The War on ‘Misinformation’ Claims Two Victims. Truth. And the Right to Treatment.”


Archived at:

By Mary Beth Pfeiffer

Two public health battles are being waged right now.

The first, of course, is against the coronavirus.

The second has its sights on a broad and amorphous target called “medical misinformation.” This campaign aims, at least in part, to control what people read, see and know about potential treatments for COVID-19. Firmly in its crosshairs is a cheap, generic drug that just might turn this pandemic around, ivermectin.

In this second battle, YouTube videos are removed. Twitter accounts with thousands of followers are purged. Facebook posts and groups are disappeared. These are the overt acts of censorship of ivermectin and other treatment contenders.

More covert is the mainstream media’s aversion to reporting virtually anything promising about early COVID treatment, including on 42 studies that collectively say ivermectin could reduce COVID deaths by 75 to 83 percent. What little is reported is that ivermectin is experimental and unproven – a drug that’s used to treat scabies and river blindness in people and parasites in horses.

For perhaps those reasons, Cheryl Jarrett, 64, initially rejected her doctor’s suggestion that she take ivermectin when diagnosed with what seemed a mild case of COVID. She changed her mind on day three, when she struggled to breathe after climbing her stairs, and a scan showed COVID infiltrates in 25 percent of her lungs.

“I took it,” she told me. “Within 2 hours I was fine.” She tried the stairs again. No problem.

There are many stories like Jarrett’s. You won’t find them in the press or on Wikipedia, a common source of ivermectin information. Share them on Facebook and you might get barred from posting, as Jarrett’s doctor, Bruce Boros, recently was.

Control of the ivermectin message ostensibly is done under the guise of protecting public health. But the effort is instead doing the opposite, according to interviews with advocates, doctors and analysts.

“There’s a war on misinformation which is hurting good information,” said Dr. Pierre Kory, president of a group of doctors advocating the drug called Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, or FLCCC. “We have all the data showing massive mortality benefits of ivermectin. The less that’s being known about it, the more deaths are resulting.”

Where It Began

The effort to manage COVID treatment information has its roots, in part, in a sad chapter in American science and journalism: The Trump endorsement last spring of hydroxychloroquine. In an instant, early treatment was turned into a right-wing myth of interest only to Fox News. The rest of the press was merciless in repeating assertions that a reliable pharmaceutical workhorse used for several diseases was dangerous for COVID. Multiple studies have since refuted that and shown effectiveness in early illness, something most people do not know.

Dr. Mobeen Syed was among the first last March to explore HCQ’s potential in a YouTube video that went viral and landed him in a love-it/hate-it, right/left firestorm. “I started getting so many threats,” he said, prompting him to take the piece down himself.

After that, however, YouTube itself decided what the 250,000 subscribers to Drbeen Medical Lectures should see, removing videos willy-nilly, it seemed, on Vitamin D, remdesivir and, what others said was frequently censored, ivermectin.

Among other examples of this new censorship trend:

  • On Jan. 31, Facebook removed a page called Ivermectin for MDs Team, with 10,200 members from more than 100 countries. The last straw was a post on the Slovak Ministry of Health’s decision to allow use of ivermectin, which Facebook censors “believe is harmful to physical integrity,” the administrator wrote. Facebook also ruled that news of ivermectin approval by a southern state in Brazil violated its standards. Put another way, the social media giant did not like two independent government decisions and thought it knew better.
  • On Jan. 12, Twitter ruled a tweet by the Brazilian Ministry of Health — 1.2 million followers — was “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information.” Why? It urged people with COVID symptoms to “go to a Health Unit and request early treatment.”
  • More egregious, YouTube recently expunged two videos posted by a U.S. Senate committee on Dr. Kory’s ivermectin testimony. Further, it purged a video in which a scientist discussed his review of ivermectin as part of a project for a World Health Organization-hosted agency called Unitaid. YouTube even removed a video on its censorship of ivermectin.

In a hint at how vast the censorship is, Facebook asserted proudly in a Feb. 8 website post that it had “removed more than 12 million pieces of content on Facebook and Instagram containing misinformation that could lead to imminent physical harm.” Seven of my posts, on an article I wrote with multiple links to the science of ivermectin, were stricken with that label. (I got off on a 14-hour posting ban.)

My efforts were fruitless to get Facebook, Twitter or Google, which owns YouTube, to explain the methodology it uses to censor. In a public post, YouTube says it disallows information that “contradicts local health authorities” and the World Health Organization. Twitter maintains it culls “content that is demonstrably false or misleading and may lead to significant risk of harm.”

But who actually decides on a video or post? Are algorithms by technicians making the decisions or scientists and doctors? Should government guidelines be the ultimate yardstick when these are evolving — and sometimes wrong?

At the outset of COVID, officials actually advised against wearing masks and treating COVID with corticosteroids; both are common practices now that are saving lives.

Moreover, government decisions in a previous plague show how fallible they can be. In 1987, HIV-AIDS activists implored Dr. Anthony Fauci to endorse the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent a virulent AIDS-related pneumonia. The government waited two years for more data, during which, Sean Strub recounts in his memoir, “Body Counts,” 17,000 people died.

What Fauci wanted then and wants today is a bigger, better, well-designed study – even if the result of waiting for it is a higher death toll.

Steve Kirsch, a California entrepreneur, has funded research on an anti-depressant-turned-anti-COVID treatment called fluvoxamine that holds huge promise for eliminating COVID early. As with ivermectin, the drug is meeting resistance.

In a Feb. 26 article in Quora, Kirsch argued that the bar for acceptance of already approved drugs must be lowered, given their known safety and efficacy. “We have evidence-based treatments today that have a high probability to significantly reduce the hospitalization and death…with virtually no incremental risk,” he wrote. “It thus is wrong, and an unnecessary loss of life, to ‘wait for more data.’” He called fluvoxamine and ivermectin the two most promising drugs for early COVID treatment.

Big Brother at Work

On Dec. 27, Twitter suspended an account called @CovidAnalysis, which had been followed by nearly 7,000 people. The account, run by anonymous scientists, routinely tweeted on COVID treatment research, and continues to summarize and analyze its implications on its website. I’m not alone in relying on its informed interpretation, which is at times guarded and critical.

Twitter provided no warning before exorcising the account and hasn’t answered the group’s request for an explanation since. Commented one follower, @c19d3k2, “I really have to wonder how close to #1984 we have edged by now.”

Other accounts have also been purged, including that of a prominent and early hydroxychloroquine supporter, Dr. Zev Zelenko, who had more than 150,000 followers.

Put aside for a minute the implications of efforts to control what Americans and citizens around the world know – about anything. Not too long ago, such control was unthinkable.

Now consider that ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug that is on the WHO list of Essential Medicines. Among more than three dozen trials are 19 peer-reviewed studies and 21 randomized controlled trials. They show ivermectin works at various stages against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It stopped infection cold in healthcare workers in three Argentinian studies and one involving 4,000 people in India. It shut down early illness in studies from Pakistan and Bangladesh. It kept people alive in Egypt and in a study in Broward County, Florida.

Doctors largely don’t know this. Nor does the general public.

I found too many examples of early treatment censorship to list them all here, including the purging of a 4,000-member Facebook group called that often discusses hydroychloroquine, and removal of a popular video by Dr. Christy Risinger imploring regulators to consider ivermectin science. Nonetheless, the blackout surely isn’t complete. There is still plenty of ivermectin information on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

But the censor’s knife, the image of the drug as a right-wing construct, and the resistance of the media to report most anything on early treatments have all taken a toll. Ivermectin, it seems, is unacceptable in public discussion of early COVID treatment.

Here’s how this plays out: Three press reports explored the myriad factors driving down COVID in India — on NPR, the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. Yet each conspicuously made no mention of treatment, despite India’s widespread use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which surely deserved discussion.

I asked a widely published science writer, Esther Landuis, her thoughts on this: “In general it seems that the over politicized hydroxychloroquine debacle has muddied the waters for mainstream science magazines,” she told me. “Many outlets are afraid to be wrong about another repurposed drug; they are waiting for definitive data from a Phase 3 RCT (randomized controlled trial) with thousands of patients.”

The Upshot of Silencing

Ivermectin research shows the drug is most effective in preventing and quelling early infection – uses that would keep people out of hospitals and prevent long-haul symptoms. Yet ivermectin censorship robs patients of treatment with a safe drug that could be used off label and with informed consent. Many drugs are used this way, particularly in ICUs, where patients may be on a dozen medications in hopes that something works.

But ask for ivermectin for a family member, and you’ll likely be told, as one family member of a patient was, “We don’t use that here.” As a consequence, families of hospitalized patients sometimes go to great lengths to get it.

The family of a Texas man, 67, plotted to smuggle ivermectin to him in food then had lawyer intervene to secure the drug. Two New York state families got court orders to allow women, 80 and 65 years old, to be given ivermectin – but only prescribed by their personal physicians. When Dr. Erica Espinosa thought she would lose her husband – also a physician — to COVID-19, she arranged to fly him to a Houston hospital (six air ambulance companies declined) because it uses a protocol that includes ivermectin. Few hospitals do.

In those four cases, all but the Texas man rallied after getting ivermectin, and his treatment delay surely did not help. His death on Feb. 5 devastated his family; he left a wife of 40 years, two sons and daughters-in-law, and six grandchildren.

Dr. Bruce Boros, Cheryl Jarrett’s doctor and the owner of three urgent care centers in the Florida Keys, recently served time in what he and others call “Facebook Jail,” having run afoul of ivermectin censors. That’s small potatoes to Boros, however, who treated one hospitalized patient, Kyle Carter, by having ivermectin delivered to his bedside and directing him by phone on how much to take. (The hospital said it didn’t have the drug and then delayed giving it while Carter struggled to breathe.)

“Within 12 hours,” Carter told me, “I was feeling pretty fantastic. I knew that something had changed.” He still doesn’t know if the hospital was aware he’d taken ivermectin.

Two hundred patients later, Boros says this: “If your doctor doesn’t give this to you, get another doctor.”

If only it were that easy.

***Mary Beth Pfeiffer is an investigative journalist and the author of two books. Her website:

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s and not necessarily those of TrialSite News LLC.

Explore Further:

%d bloggers like this: