Archives for category: survival

Cosmology is the Conspiracy

It would appear quite possible that groups of people create collective realities seeming unconsciously, and cause via their collective belief, events to take on what would appear to be an ‘unconscious’ but in reality is a ‘super-conscious’ intelligence that is organized, functions as though it were managed by individuals (even when it is not) and the result is, we can read into those events as though they were managed in a sense they actually are not.

This collective ‘meme’ can explain what is called in the biblical sense ‘principalities of darkness’ or that is to say a ‘spirit of evil’ managing events in a sense of both conspiracy and superstition.

There is quite a bit of ‘coincidental incidence’ in our world indicating peoples of the western culture are creating reality quite independent of self-aware thought and, to a rational observer, it could seem almost certainly by design when in fact this is not necessarily the case. Such would explain a belief in Illuminati when in fact it did not exist in any individual self conscious or ego-aware organized form but nevertheless manifest as an observable phenomena of symptoms or consequence derived from a collective super-conscious phenomenon.

A conclusion could  be there is a ‘super awareness’ of the group causes what appears to be ingenious evil of conspiracy when in fact there is no one individual or group of managers within the group capable of implementing these designs which, nonetheless in actuality, are perceived. To accomplish a reality of evil would only require evil ideas as cultural drivers; whether neoliberal fascism or fascism at the other end of the spectrum of the horseshoe where they meet, Huxley and Orwell both had it right. Huxley’s ‘it’s all about me’ descriptions of licentiousness points to the MTV generation and the global mono-culture of Soros, whereas Orwell’s sequestered environmental portraits aptly describe today’s several manifestations of religious fundamentalist cultures ultimately embedded in institutions of state; where lifting the curtain often discovers rampant closet decadence resembling the Sodom these ‘people’ (if they can be called that) so vehemently condemn.

The natural progression to end result would be, when a large portion of an aggressive society collectively believes in an archetype, whether a science fiction ‘utopia’ (despite the collective social denial this is in fact a murderous dystopia) or religion inspired Armageddon, all of the necessary players will naturally manifest in a super-conscious organized format empowered to bring it off, where no one individual or group of individuals or players could effect this by individual or personal volition; nevertheless the super-consciousness of the event’s initiating group insures creation of this reality for the collective whole. Huxley or Orwell? Which past projection of these valid co-equal realities will win out?

Huxley’s projected manifestations that became Google, Gates and Suckerberg pushing trans-humanism on this world stand little chance of survival when contrasted to Orwell’s projected, medieval, but 21st Century technology empowered, apocalyptic ‘good versus evil’ fable driving our Western world’s fundamentalist religions’ reality.

If you’ve not seen the Pentagon in this light, and radical Christian cosmology is the effective driver of what appears to be pointed to inevitable catastrophic outcome, better to change fables at the top, you think? Now, just how do you suppose this change of fables at the apex of military power could be accomplished? As things stand,  we’re all little more than an extinction event waiting to happen. To all of us.

Of course, even if it were somehow managed to remove the nukes from the hands of our military/industrial complex control (yo, senile Joe, our religious Pentagon’s Orwellian possession of ‘tactical’ nukes likely to move WWIII towards an extinction event aren’t necessarily controlled by your presidential ‘football’) we all still remain on the receiving end of Huxley’s social projection morphed into ‘trans-humanism’ pushed by Gates & Suckerberg. It’s the mRNA vaccine scene called Covid 19. Ouch.

*

Satirized information for the seasoned cynic:

DIY is the American acronym for ‘do it yourself.’ Now, sit down before you go on to read what follows; where reality mocks sanity.

Firstly, anyone reading here can go to any search engine and order ‘do it yourself’ [diy] gene editing kits. Enter “diy gene editing” and what do you know! What used to be the province of scientific labs at universities is history, last century, passé, done and over with. A bright 17 year old with wealthy and disconnected parents can, these days, set up a world class equipped, home laboratory in the basement of his house and create what could amount to a military grade bio-weapons facility.

Yep. Been worried about what DARPA might do? So dated, out-of fashion, these days any wealthy kid with an IQ of 150, left to raise himself up to be a sociopath, can do what was proposed at the Pentagon [link to post subjected to an intense information war determined to ‘debunk’ it] a scant 15 years ago; genetically edit religious conviction out of the future:

Ooooh… those naughty scientists at wooohan were so careless to let the genie out of the geopolitical bottle, er, I meant let Bat-woman do the big no-no… when actuality is, it could be (these days) any pissed off bright person with a bit of money and biological know-how and an ax to grind with humanity can make mass shooters look like your typically ignorant school yard bully… and f***ing harmless by comparison. In fact (except for its creator) nobody knows for certain and most likely we’ll never know with absolute certainty where Covid 19 actually came from. All we do know is, it looks like it was made in a lab, kitchen, basement or garage.

Yes, folks, that’s what Cartesian-Platonic civilization’s ‘thirst to know’ has brought us all to (Western science is the story of Pandora’s Box) while our political bosses are running us all off a cliff like lemmings; enabling their corrupt buddies at big pharma to take advantage of ’emergency use authorizations’ generating vast amounts of filthy lucre with even more experimental gene editing .. the only fit for lab rats mRNA gene therapies created by scientists not nearly so bright as our world’s angry kids.

Either one could kill us all –

Covid: Scientific Counter-Narratives

Covid scientific counter-narrative links to information provided by front-line doctors and top scientific researchers from universities and other institutions that are suppressed by algorithms at google search and have been censored at Facebook, Twitter, Youtube & LinkedIn.  If it appears any of the links have been scrubbed from the net, copy the link location (control + click with a macbook on any link below) and enter it into the search-bar at https://archive.li/ (where the articles are backed up.) This list is frequently updated. The first three articles are my own, most of the rest (with a few exceptions) are either external links or journalism republished at ronaldthomaswest.com.

When Western Culture Turned to Cannibalism

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part one

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part two

Vaccinated Dropping Dead in Scotland: Official Statistics

Delta Variant in India: No Worse Than a Common Cold

CDC Notice: PCR Test Goes to Trash (see Gates & Soros)

Gates & Soros to Buy Covid Testing Company

Forensic Analysis: 9,000 Vaccine Deaths Should be 45,000

PCR False Positives Big Problem in Australia

USA New Trend: More Deaths From Vaccine Than Covid

UK New Trend: More Cases in Vaccinated Than Unvaccinated

Pfizer Ex-VP: “Fact-Checkers Pack of Lies”

Dr Martin’s Fauci/Covid Criminal Dossier (pdf 205 pages)

PCR Tests Accuracy Debunked (again)

EUA (experimental) Vaccines Violate Nuremberg Ethics 

Canada Fires Another Top Doctor for Raising Questions

Pfizer Manipulated Vaccine Protocols for Children

USA Senator: Suppression of Vaccine Deaths in Media

Politics of Ivermectin in Indonesia

18-39? AstraZeneca Twice as Likely to Kill You as Covid

Fear Mongers vs Delta Variant kills 0.08% of Unvaccinated

Countless Holes in the Official Covid Narrative (the long read)

Lisbon court: 0.9% (152) covid deaths, not the 17,000 claimed (pdf)

1.5 Million Vaccine Injuries, 15,000+ Deaths in EU (1/2 of Europe)

Top Medical Professor Fired for Questioning Vaccinating Children

Inventor of mRNA censored at Youtube for saying “ivermectin”

Moderna mRNA Vaccine Developed Before Covid Outbreak

Asymptomatic Covid Spread Alarm Was False

Science Breakthrough: How Ivermectin Works on Covid

PhD in Immunology censored at Youtube

India Lawsuit Against WHO Chief Scientist (pdf)

India Bar Association Sues WHO Chief Scientist

Corrupt WHO Pushes Back on Ivermectin in India

India Court Over-Rules WHO, Allows Ivermectin

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Mexico City

Pfizer’s Own Research Reveals mRNA Vaccine deadly

Suppressing Ivermectin Has Killed 1/2 Million (to May 2021)

John Hopkins Professor: 1/2 of Americans are immune

The Drug That Cracked Covid (pdf file)

CDC Data 12,000% Increase in Deaths With EUA Vaccines

Another 160 Experts Say Stop the Experimental Jabs

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Delhi

How Corruption Suppresses Ivermectin

Paper by 57 Scientists: Stop EUA Vaccinating Now

Bill Gates Protects Big Pharma Profits on Covid Vaccines

More on mRNA Experimental Vaccine

Top Yale University Researcher: Ivermectin Kills Covid

Covid vs Flu: Where is the Grim Reaper’s Scythe in 2020-2021?

Covid: Suppression of Scientific Counter-Narratives

mRNA: “It’s Gene Therapy, Not A Vaccine” David Martin, PhD

We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April by Dr Marty Makary (Johns Hopkins)

Treat Your Own Covid by John Day MD

Beating covid with generic drugs

The Great Barrington Declaration on covid

Fear is the Killer on covid

PCR False Positives (Study: Ten Fatal Flaws)

Propaganda & Corona Virus

*

Covid 19

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

“…It is also clear that the overall death rate in 2020 was exceeded by the five years of 1999-2003. I need to define the death rate here, as it is based on the deaths per thousand people, which eliminates the fact that populations were lower in earlier years. It’s a given that larger population might have a higher death total from a given disease, but not a higher death rate. Diseases work on the susceptible individuals of a population and, thus, it is a proportion of the population that becomes ill or dies.

“That said, how does the death rate in the UK for 2020 compare to previous years? It is clear that the death rate in the UK for 2020 was not exceptional compared to previous years. How can that be? If you have Covid-19 as well as influenza killing people, what is going on? An observation has been made that, for some mysterious reason, influenza, as of April in the US, dropped to zero and continues at zero in the latest flu season.

“In light of the apparent missing influenza, claims have been made that masking, distancing, and lockdowns were completely effective against influenza, but then there is no talk about its failure in stopping Covid-19, which is a virus of the same size and transmission mode.

“Then, we are told that Covid is still around because people are not masking and such properly, which means influenza should also still be around in the US. Since these are infectious viruses, how can these restrictions be effective against one virus and not the other? It does not make sense.

“It is also easy to find that US states with strict mandates have the same rates of PCR-positive cases as those who do not. The conjecture can be made that influenza cases are largely reported as Covid-19, based either on a positive PCR test result or on symptoms alone.

“In the US, it is clear that there has been a monetary incentive for diagnosing the disease and encouraging hospitalizations. The cessation of other medical procedures and tests during this period clearly is going to lead to increased overall deaths. The fact that there appears to be no excess deaths despite this, indicates that the C-19 virus itself was not as lethal as they claim.

“Overall, the death rate in the UK is not out of line with the normal death rates from other years and clearly not close to the highest in the last 22 years. It is difficult to consider influenza deaths when there appears to be a bias toward categorizing influenza and other causes as Covid-19 deaths.

“Every year and, for that matter, all year long, there is a population of health-critical individuals who may be overwhelmed by a flu-like illness and open to pneumonia complications. The questionable Covid-19 PCR test appears to be keeping the presence of Covid-19 alive, possibly detecting viruses of the current flu season.

“The WHO is now admitting that that this test can be 97% false positives or more, with higher processing cycle numbers. The argument could be made that we have an epidemic of [false positive] testing…”

Or so says PhD biologist Banson Wilcot at ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International. [1]

So, I looked up several references not related to the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site itself on the subject of how the ‘flu vanished’ and Wilcot seems to spot on.

Why? I was trying to make sense of Covid numbers in Serbia (that don’t make sense) and Wilcot’s was the first article I’d come across that addressed the issue in a sensible way. Specifically, I wanted to know how a vicious pathogen (Covid) could justify pandemic “measures” when the national mortality rate for the year 2020 hadn’t spiked (at all) in comparison to previous years:

Graph: Serbia’s death rate has been flat at 13.2 deaths average per 1,000 for the past four years; 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2020. [2]

The ‘fringe conspiracy’ site then caused me to look at other statistics to establish (or disestablish) its veracity while casting a wider net to see what is going on elsewhere in comparison to Serbia and violà! The so-called ‘progressive’ site VOX News supports two points made by ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot:

1) Flu has virtually vanished in the USA (VOX graph credit to Center for Disease Control and Prevention) for the 2020-2021 statistical season &  2) the VOX article upholds the oxymoron pointed out by Wilcot; crediting masks for the ‘historic’ low level of flu in the same environment where masks have NOT halted the spread of Covid, a disease spread by identical method. Clearly, someone is not being honest concerning the ‘vanished flu’ phenomenon and it would appear that dishonest someone is VOX and is NOT ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot. [3]

Now, for some initial perspective on what certainly appear to be grossly inflated figures ascribed to Covid in the USA with highly unreliable PCR tests as well as forgoing tests for other pathogens (includes the vanished flu and likely many tens of thousands of deaths by other pathogens and related underlying cause such as frail health or any other reason wrongly attributed to Covid.) [4]

If we take the roughly 500,000 deaths ‘attributed’ to Covid in the USA and apply that as a percentage to the USA population of about 330 million for the 2020-2021 season, Americans arrived at sacrificing their civil liberties for a 0.15% gross population Covid death rate that relies on severely inflated (official) Covid numbers incorporating the missing flu and untold other causes of death such as stress related deaths due to underlying health issues aggravated by lock-downs, Covid related policies pushing people into poverty & higher mortality, America’s staggering problem with obesity (Covid kills obese people in high numbers), attrition in America’s exploding homeless population et cetera. These numbers won’t be properly sorted before years of study but in the meanwhile a highly politicized (Dr ‘Faustus’ driven) Covid panic-power grab dishonestly lumps everything together. Bolstering Wilcot’s account:

I still can’t find 500,000 excess deaths caused by Covid in 2020; they’re simply not there among the diseases the CDC reported out and since the base risk is 1/50,000 even across half the population being infected we could only account for 3,000 deaths. It is thus clear that if in fact Covid-19 has killed anywhere near the number of people claimed those other morbid conditions, all of which are serious diseases standing alone, have to account for the increase between them. Indeed the most-common, by far (40% of additional deaths by disease) were due to heart attacks and the next was diabetes at 13%. Between diabetes and heart attacks, both almost-exclusively due to lifestyle choices and thus your personal decisions, 53% of the excess 120,475 deaths are accounted for. If we add in strokes, which also are largely lifestyle-related then we’re at about 2/3rds.

Among those diseases that are allegedly “the biggest comorbid factors” I can find only 120,475 more deaths that Covid-19 may have contributed to and which included those diseases as a causal factor in total. Did Covid-19 cause all of those 120,000 additional deaths or were they caused by, in the case of diabetes, strokes and heart attacks for example, the additional 50lbs that a material percentage of people put on during the lockdowns (and over 20lbs on average!) from eating takeout trash full of fast carbs and being involuntarily cooped up in their homes? We do not know so this can only describe an upper boundary or caused mortality — not a lower one. This analysis doesn’t mean even more people didn’t die with Covid, but an alleged “Covid” death that wasn’t accompanied by one of the CDC’s specifically-called out diseases” (maybe those 500,000 USA covid deaths don’t actually exist: 24 April 2021 update, read it HERE)

As pointed out by Wilcot, the official USA numbers (that don’t add up) are consistent with what is observed in the United Kingdom’s data. It should be expected this will be the case elsewhere.

Back to Serbia:

If we take the ‘official’ Covid death rate 0.9% or 4,700 deaths (necessarily includes the ‘missing’ flu and other untold manner of death) and rather than apply this to what should be called ‘the includes false positives aggregate’ or 516,000 (reported positives) and instead apply this official death statistic (4,700) attributed to Covid to the 8,700,000 population of Serbia as whole (includes untested & tested negative) to arrive at 0.05%, it is only then a flat national death rate (no significant statistical increase) for the ‘pandemic’ year 2020 begins to make sense because it is only then we can understand what happened to the ‘missing’ flu and other, untold manner of death. They’ve been folded into the Covid statistic. There is no other straightforward explanation. [5]

Now that ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Banson Wilcot PhD is vindicated, let’s shortly note one other article at the ‘offending’ site Principia Scientific International on Covid: the article by another PhD (psychology), Dr Elsa Schieder, on Ivermectin. In short, she simply states what is known to be a scientifically established fact; Ivermectin cures Covid, except in those states that suppress this information about an effective, generic (cheap) drug that should render the vaccine hysteria moot. [6], [7]

The inescapable conclusion is that Covid, although real, and in some cases deadly, is not nearly so lethal on a societal-wide basis as it is presented to us, and need not be nearly so lethal as it presently is. The obvious question is why?

Social Analysis

Firstly, in Western cultures particularly, people lie to themselves, especially when it comes to pecuniary interests versus altruism. There is big money in addressing Covid as a (blown out of proportion) ‘pandemic’ and self importance takes on altruism as a lie (self deceit of doing the right thing) when in fact it is the pecuniary interests (money is power) driving the urge to control. So, the Covid ‘pandemic’ is not as much a conspiracy to control populations (even as strategies are devised to do this) as much as it is a self-importance inflating, power driven meme.

Western style politicians (taking bait from the sociopath oligarchs fishing for them with lobbyists) are narcissists, and narcissists are those personality constructs which are most prone to self deceits. In lay terms, it should be said our leaders are self-aggrandizing morons incapable of comprehending the damage they are causing is by far worse than the damage which should happen if they were to step out of the way, stop politicizing medicine and let the community doctors do their job with a full set of Covid facts available to them (e.g. treat with Ivermectin.)

Insofar as the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International, well, in fact it harbors an Islamophobe associated personality like the Dr Elsa Schieder mentioned above, who it just happens provided accurate information on Ivermectin, together with any number of other trained scientists who do not (for whatever reasons) find a place in mainstream to have a voice. What does it say about Western culture when searching for the better information, one finds it at a site that is not entirely wholesome? How is that somehow more damning than the Western media lies we are fed every day by corporate entities protecting the interests of Western oligarchs and their corrupt self (and societal-wide) political deceits concerning Covid, leading to unnecessary loss of life?

[1] https://principia-scientific.com/uk-covid-conundrum-the-mysterious-case-of-disappearing-flu/

[2] https://knoema.com/atlas/Serbia/Death-rate

[3] https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22272237/flu-cases-down-historic-what-does-it-mean

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3313670-serbian-government-to-adopt-stricter-covid-measures-upper-elementary-school-grades-switch-online

[6] https://principia-scientific.com/ivermectin-miracle-drug-against-covid-19/

[7] https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

When greed supersedes racism, suddenly, ‘everyone is a nigger.’ Trump’s manipulated ‘white trash’ or ‘crackers’ had failed to understand it is identical underlying force, greed, and greed’s attending model of exploitation, had been the origin of chattel slavery that now underwrites the collapse of the blue collar, white middle class. We shouldn’t blame Trump for creating the conditions creating a new class of honky crackers (globalism did that) but certainly Trump exploited their ‘hope’ when he surrounded himself with world class criminal sociopaths on the extreme right of the 1% (the 2019 Trump cabinet included 17 millionaires, 2 one hundred million plus millionaires and 1 billionaire; altogether worth $3.2 billion.) Any expectation this crew would have sacrificed any portion of their fortunes (via profit losses) by reinvesting in the USA rather than cheap, outsourced labor, is fantasy par excellence. We’re all ‘niggers’ now, not to mention ‘useless eaters.’

What has manifest since Bill Clinton deregulated the American economy is a form of 21st Century slavery that doesn’t give a damn for the color of your skin and it doesn’t matter to any of the 1% whether your ‘master’ is on the left or right. Just don’t hurt the bottom line (profit) because the underlying motive is ‘all you stupid white niggers, if the global 1% can get you all fighting with (the dumber than fuck) antifa, as well as hating blacks, Mexicans, kulaks and chinks, we’ll never have to worry about y’all getting together to throw us out.’ So, listen up, whitey, here’s the what and how behind the modern rendition of what’s happening to you, with a relevant thumbnail history:

When America’s ‘European morality’ had ‘matured’ and the abolition of slavery became a political expediency of Abraham Lincoln…

“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that”

…following the war which ‘saved the union’, ’emancipation’ was morphed into 100 years of ‘Jim Crow era’ where freed slaves and their descendants were denied voting rights and were literally “barbecued” or lynched after having been tortured to death, sometimes burned alive or dragged to death, with large attending crowds photographed with the dead  victims at these events made into postcards that were delivered by the United States Postal Service.

In fact Lincoln (and his successors) didn’t give a rat’s ass for the civil rights of blacks, he just wanted (and did) what was necessary to keep his political power intact while serving an industrialized North with it’s own system of chattel exploitation (keep reading.)

Abandoning their ’40 acres and a mule’ (a sort of compensation towards a ‘new’ post-slavery life) in droves, over six million blacks fled the South’s ‘crackermania’, migrating to cities in the West and North of the USA where they took the bait of the industrial corporations offers of factory work; that is, until the factories were no longer profitable and the corporations abandoned these communities to their own devices with little opportunity at community advancement or even sustaining what they’d gained in the short term. Locked into a subsequent social prejudice driven poverty with menial labor afforded to the LUCKY ONES, that’s the short history leading to America’s ‘black slums.’ Nobody with the political power to repair this actually gave a damn, they were all bought then, little different to now.

That’s the principle, in short, of what drives today’s globalism and makes everyone poor, regardless of color of skin. Corporations have taken their capital out of America’s communities to invest in cheaper labor abroad and the white working class is collapsing into the same poverty that had been the experience of the black communities previous to this. Now, how’s it feel to be the ‘nigger’? And it doesn’t stop there, because when they decide you’re too much burden, or think you’re becoming ‘uppity’, they’ll ‘barbecue’ you too (little different to any hellfire missile launched outside the empire’s “homeland”)

Maybe, just maybe, whitey, y’all should look at setting some history aside and begin negotiating some détente and political alliances with black people in the lower middle class communities you should be grateful hadn’t adopted the attitude of ‘the only good cracker is a dead cracker.’ From there alliances might be bridged deeper into those ghettos with a seething anger at what had happened to them and what is now happening to you. Nobody has to be in love, only reasoned, civil and fair.

The concluding reality is, if the 1% are Sneetches decorated with stars, and Trump is a Sneetch with a star, what Trump actually promised you, that is recovering the short lived ‘golden age’ of the white America of the 1950s, that horse has bolted the barn. It ain’t coming back and the Sneetches with stars who stole it from you aren’t going to share the wealth because criminals don’t voluntarily surrender their business models. Whatever opportunities might exist aren’t going to manifest from nostalgia; and they won’t manifest at all so long as the filthy rich can keep you all hating, divided and fighting from a stance of ignorance.

A closing note would be to the crackers’ adversaries, that is libtards in general, Black Lives Matter (shouldn’t all life matter?) and antifa; insofar as the one percent millionaire and de facto President Harris using you like the idiots you are, you’re dumber than this cracker portrayed wondering at a life in a world that never did exist and never will exist:

She’s an incarceration queen chosen by corporate boards to protect their wealth from you, anyone and everyone, end of story. Maybe all you libtards should look at opening a dialogue with the ‘crackers’ … because if you were actually ‘woke’ you’d understand we’re all niggers now.

*

Some serious reading:

[1] https://www.abhmuseum.org/one-hundred-years-of-jim-crow/

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-17/this-map-of-u-s-lynchings-spans-1835-to-1964

[3] https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2019/07/25/the-definitive-net-worth-of-donald-trumps-cabinet/?sh=1fcf913c6a15

[4] https://www.opensecrets.org/personal-finances/Kamala-Harris/assets?cid=N00036915&year=2018

[5] https://nypost.com/2020/08/12/inside-kamala-harris-polarizing-record-as-a-prosecutor/

Čitajte na srpskom

Facebook, Twitter & Youtube (the ‘big boys’), all playing gatekeeper:

“The War on ‘Misinformation’ Claims Two Victims. Truth. And the Right to Treatment.”

At: https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

Archived at: https://archive.li/tXJNW

By Mary Beth Pfeiffer

Two public health battles are being waged right now.

The first, of course, is against the coronavirus.

The second has its sights on a broad and amorphous target called “medical misinformation.” This campaign aims, at least in part, to control what people read, see and know about potential treatments for COVID-19. Firmly in its crosshairs is a cheap, generic drug that just might turn this pandemic around, ivermectin.

In this second battle, YouTube videos are removed. Twitter accounts with thousands of followers are purged. Facebook posts and groups are disappeared. These are the overt acts of censorship of ivermectin and other treatment contenders.

More covert is the mainstream media’s aversion to reporting virtually anything promising about early COVID treatment, including on 42 studies that collectively say ivermectin could reduce COVID deaths by 75 to 83 percent. What little is reported is that ivermectin is experimental and unproven – a drug that’s used to treat scabies and river blindness in people and parasites in horses.

For perhaps those reasons, Cheryl Jarrett, 64, initially rejected her doctor’s suggestion that she take ivermectin when diagnosed with what seemed a mild case of COVID. She changed her mind on day three, when she struggled to breathe after climbing her stairs, and a scan showed COVID infiltrates in 25 percent of her lungs.

“I took it,” she told me. “Within 2 hours I was fine.” She tried the stairs again. No problem.

There are many stories like Jarrett’s. You won’t find them in the press or on Wikipedia, a common source of ivermectin information. Share them on Facebook and you might get barred from posting, as Jarrett’s doctor, Bruce Boros, recently was.

Control of the ivermectin message ostensibly is done under the guise of protecting public health. But the effort is instead doing the opposite, according to interviews with advocates, doctors and analysts.

“There’s a war on misinformation which is hurting good information,” said Dr. Pierre Kory, president of a group of doctors advocating the drug called Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, or FLCCC. “We have all the data showing massive mortality benefits of ivermectin. The less that’s being known about it, the more deaths are resulting.”

Where It Began

The effort to manage COVID treatment information has its roots, in part, in a sad chapter in American science and journalism: The Trump endorsement last spring of hydroxychloroquine. In an instant, early treatment was turned into a right-wing myth of interest only to Fox News. The rest of the press was merciless in repeating assertions that a reliable pharmaceutical workhorse used for several diseases was dangerous for COVID. Multiple studies have since refuted that and shown effectiveness in early illness, something most people do not know.

Dr. Mobeen Syed was among the first last March to explore HCQ’s potential in a YouTube video that went viral and landed him in a love-it/hate-it, right/left firestorm. “I started getting so many threats,” he said, prompting him to take the piece down himself.

After that, however, YouTube itself decided what the 250,000 subscribers to Drbeen Medical Lectures should see, removing videos willy-nilly, it seemed, on Vitamin D, remdesivir and, what others said was frequently censored, ivermectin.

Among other examples of this new censorship trend:

  • On Jan. 31, Facebook removed a page called Ivermectin for MDs Team, with 10,200 members from more than 100 countries. The last straw was a post on the Slovak Ministry of Health’s decision to allow use of ivermectin, which Facebook censors “believe is harmful to physical integrity,” the administrator wrote. Facebook also ruled that news of ivermectin approval by a southern state in Brazil violated its standards. Put another way, the social media giant did not like two independent government decisions and thought it knew better.
  • On Jan. 12, Twitter ruled a tweet by the Brazilian Ministry of Health — 1.2 million followers — was “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information.” Why? It urged people with COVID symptoms to “go to a Health Unit and request early treatment.”
  • More egregious, YouTube recently expunged two videos posted by a U.S. Senate committee on Dr. Kory’s ivermectin testimony. Further, it purged a video in which a scientist discussed his review of ivermectin as part of a project for a World Health Organization-hosted agency called Unitaid. YouTube even removed a video on its censorship of ivermectin.

In a hint at how vast the censorship is, Facebook asserted proudly in a Feb. 8 website post that it had “removed more than 12 million pieces of content on Facebook and Instagram containing misinformation that could lead to imminent physical harm.” Seven of my posts, on an article I wrote with multiple links to the science of ivermectin, were stricken with that label. (I got off on a 14-hour posting ban.)

My efforts were fruitless to get Facebook, Twitter or Google, which owns YouTube, to explain the methodology it uses to censor. In a public post, YouTube says it disallows information that “contradicts local health authorities” and the World Health Organization. Twitter maintains it culls “content that is demonstrably false or misleading and may lead to significant risk of harm.”

But who actually decides on a video or post? Are algorithms by technicians making the decisions or scientists and doctors? Should government guidelines be the ultimate yardstick when these are evolving — and sometimes wrong?

At the outset of COVID, officials actually advised against wearing masks and treating COVID with corticosteroids; both are common practices now that are saving lives.

Moreover, government decisions in a previous plague show how fallible they can be. In 1987, HIV-AIDS activists implored Dr. Anthony Fauci to endorse the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent a virulent AIDS-related pneumonia. The government waited two years for more data, during which, Sean Strub recounts in his memoir, “Body Counts,” 17,000 people died.

What Fauci wanted then and wants today is a bigger, better, well-designed study – even if the result of waiting for it is a higher death toll.

Steve Kirsch, a California entrepreneur, has funded research on an anti-depressant-turned-anti-COVID treatment called fluvoxamine that holds huge promise for eliminating COVID early. As with ivermectin, the drug is meeting resistance.

In a Feb. 26 article in Quora, Kirsch argued that the bar for acceptance of already approved drugs must be lowered, given their known safety and efficacy. “We have evidence-based treatments today that have a high probability to significantly reduce the hospitalization and death…with virtually no incremental risk,” he wrote. “It thus is wrong, and an unnecessary loss of life, to ‘wait for more data.’” He called fluvoxamine and ivermectin the two most promising drugs for early COVID treatment.

Big Brother at Work

On Dec. 27, Twitter suspended an account called @CovidAnalysis, which had been followed by nearly 7,000 people. The account, run by anonymous scientists, routinely tweeted on COVID treatment research, and continues to summarize and analyze its implications on its website. I’m not alone in relying on its informed interpretation, which is at times guarded and critical.

Twitter provided no warning before exorcising the account and hasn’t answered the group’s request for an explanation since. Commented one follower, @c19d3k2, “I really have to wonder how close to #1984 we have edged by now.”

Other accounts have also been purged, including that of a prominent and early hydroxychloroquine supporter, Dr. Zev Zelenko, who had more than 150,000 followers.

Put aside for a minute the implications of efforts to control what Americans and citizens around the world know – about anything. Not too long ago, such control was unthinkable.

Now consider that ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug that is on the WHO list of Essential Medicines. Among more than three dozen trials are 19 peer-reviewed studies and 21 randomized controlled trials. They show ivermectin works at various stages against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It stopped infection cold in healthcare workers in three Argentinian studies and one involving 4,000 people in India. It shut down early illness in studies from Pakistan and Bangladesh. It kept people alive in Egypt and in a study in Broward County, Florida.

Doctors largely don’t know this. Nor does the general public.

I found too many examples of early treatment censorship to list them all here, including the purging of a 4,000-member Facebook group called COVEXIT.com that often discusses hydroychloroquine, and removal of a popular video by Dr. Christy Risinger imploring regulators to consider ivermectin science. Nonetheless, the blackout surely isn’t complete. There is still plenty of ivermectin information on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

But the censor’s knife, the image of the drug as a right-wing construct, and the resistance of the media to report most anything on early treatments have all taken a toll. Ivermectin, it seems, is unacceptable in public discussion of early COVID treatment.

Here’s how this plays out: Three press reports explored the myriad factors driving down COVID in India — on NPR, the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. Yet each conspicuously made no mention of treatment, despite India’s widespread use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which surely deserved discussion.

I asked a widely published science writer, Esther Landuis, her thoughts on this: “In general it seems that the over politicized hydroxychloroquine debacle has muddied the waters for mainstream science magazines,” she told me. “Many outlets are afraid to be wrong about another repurposed drug; they are waiting for definitive data from a Phase 3 RCT (randomized controlled trial) with thousands of patients.”

The Upshot of Silencing

Ivermectin research shows the drug is most effective in preventing and quelling early infection – uses that would keep people out of hospitals and prevent long-haul symptoms. Yet ivermectin censorship robs patients of treatment with a safe drug that could be used off label and with informed consent. Many drugs are used this way, particularly in ICUs, where patients may be on a dozen medications in hopes that something works.

But ask for ivermectin for a family member, and you’ll likely be told, as one family member of a patient was, “We don’t use that here.” As a consequence, families of hospitalized patients sometimes go to great lengths to get it.

The family of a Texas man, 67, plotted to smuggle ivermectin to him in food then had lawyer intervene to secure the drug. Two New York state families got court orders to allow women, 80 and 65 years old, to be given ivermectin – but only prescribed by their personal physicians. When Dr. Erica Espinosa thought she would lose her husband – also a physician — to COVID-19, she arranged to fly him to a Houston hospital (six air ambulance companies declined) because it uses a protocol that includes ivermectin. Few hospitals do.

In those four cases, all but the Texas man rallied after getting ivermectin, and his treatment delay surely did not help. His death on Feb. 5 devastated his family; he left a wife of 40 years, two sons and daughters-in-law, and six grandchildren.

Dr. Bruce Boros, Cheryl Jarrett’s doctor and the owner of three urgent care centers in the Florida Keys, recently served time in what he and others call “Facebook Jail,” having run afoul of ivermectin censors. That’s small potatoes to Boros, however, who treated one hospitalized patient, Kyle Carter, by having ivermectin delivered to his bedside and directing him by phone on how much to take. (The hospital said it didn’t have the drug and then delayed giving it while Carter struggled to breathe.)

“Within 12 hours,” Carter told me, “I was feeling pretty fantastic. I knew that something had changed.” He still doesn’t know if the hospital was aware he’d taken ivermectin.

Two hundred patients later, Boros says this: “If your doctor doesn’t give this to you, get another doctor.”

If only it were that easy.

***Mary Beth Pfeiffer is an investigative journalist and the author of two books. Her website: www.thefirstepidemic.com.

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s and not necessarily those of TrialSite News LLC.

Explore Further:

Read in English

iRNK: „To je genska terapija, a ne vakcina“

Deo serije „Priče o kovidu protivurečne naučnim“ na ovom blogu. Intervju koji sledi, sa dr Dejvidom Martinom, je u skladu sa nekoliko drugih kontra-narativa od strane naučnika iz serije Covid 19.

*

Intervju @ https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/
Arhiva @ https://archive.li/gpG3w

Dr Dejvid Martin, osnivač i predsednik kompanije M-CAM Inc., osporava naše pretpostavke o novim iRNK KOVID-19 vakcinama. Citirajući same farmaceutske kompanije, Dejvid napominje da ovo nisu vakcine, već zapravo, genska terapija. Objašnjava šta nam vakcine mogu učiniti, šta oni obećavaju da nam mogu učiniti, i kako da napravimo razliku. U nastavku je transkript intervjua Hilde Gor sa dr Dejvidom Martinom.

HG: Imam prijatelje koji su primili jednu od novih vakcina protiv Kovida-19, a imate ih i Vi. To su najbrže razvijene vakcine u čitavoj našoj medicinskoj istoriji i mnogi ljudi staju u red da bi ih primili što pre. Od čega su napravljene? Šta nam mogu učiniti? Zašto ih promovišu i ko to čini? Ovo je epizoda 292, a naš gost je dr Dejvid Martin. Diplomirao je na Univerzitetu Gošen, magistrirao na Bol Stejt (Ball State) Univerzitetu i doktorirao na Univerzitetu Virdžinija. On je inovator, profesor i čovek sa obimnom biografijom punom dostignuća.

Sa Dejvidom smo se fokusirali na iRNK KOVID-19 vakcine. On prolazi glavna pitanja koja ih okružuju. Pregleda tehnologiju iRNK i objašnjava kako se radi o genskoj terapiji, a ne o vakcini i našem uobičajenom razumevanju te reči. Sagledava probleme sa PCR testovima i čak nam pomaže da razumemo naše šire vanredno stanje. Na kraju, objašnjava kako nas strah na podsvesnom nivou može naterati da se odupremo istini.

Dobrodošli u emisiju, Dejvid.

DM: Hvala Vam. Divno je biti ovde.

HG: Imam prijateljicu koji radi u školskom sistemu. Dobila je pismo u kojem se sugeriše da je ona ključni radnik i da treba da primi jednu od ovih novih vakcina koje su u razvoju protiv ovog virusa KOVID. Šta bi trebalo da zna pre nego što to učini?

DM: Počnimo sa vašom uvodnom rečenicom. Nijedna reč u nizu koju ste upotrebili ne postoji u stvarnosti. Razotkrijmo to. Pre svega, ne postoji vakcina koja je u razvoju ili se planira da bude vakcina protiv virusa SARS-CoV-2. To ne postoji. To nije razvijeno. Nije čak ni 2021. godine u razmišljanju. To je jedna od nesrećnih stvari u vezi sa onim što se događa u propagandnom ratu, koji se odvija u februaru, Svetska zdravstvena organizacija je potpuno jasno stavila do znanja da SARS-CoV-2 ili virus i KOVID-19, što je serija kliničkih prezentacija bolesti, bile su dve različite stvari.

HG: Pravite zanimljivu razliku. Čula sam da je SARS-CoV-2 „virus“ i da je KOVID-19 bolest. Da li to govorite?

DM: KOVID 19 nije bolest. To je niz kliničkih simptoma. To je džinovski spektar stvari povezanih sa onim što je nekada bilo povezano sa gripom i drugim febrilnim bolestima. Problem koji imamo je taj što je u februaru, Svetska zdravstvena organizacija jasno izjavila da ne bi trebalo da postoji mešanje ove dve stvari. Jedno je virus po njihovoj definiciji, a drugo je skup kliničkih simptoma. U februaru je postojala iluzija da je SARS-CoV-2 izazvao KOVID-19. Problem sa tom definicijom i sa očekivanjima je da većina ljudi pozitivnih na testu metodom RT-PCR za testiranje, zbog fragmenata onoga što je povezano sa SARS-CoV-2, uopšte nije bolesna. Iluzija, da virus uzrokuje bolest, se raspala. To je razlog zašto su izmislili termin asimptomatski nosač.

HG: Drugim rečima, mogla bih da dobijem pozitivan rezultat ovog PCR testa i iz razloga što nisam asimptomatična, ono što se dešava je to što uopšte nisam bolesna. Oni su dali lažnu pretpostavku da SARS-CoV-2 uzrokuje KOVID-19.

DM: To nikada nije bio slučaj, nikada nije bio i nikada neće biti slučaj. Postoji uzročna izjava koja se daje u medijima gde je, na primer, Džons Hopkins ili platforma za praćenje KOVID ili bilo koja od ovih stvari namerno zavarala ljude. U Virdžiniji nema 5.000 novih slučajeva. Potencijalno može biti nekoliko hiljada pozitivnih PCR testova, ali većina ljudi koji imaju pozitivan test nikada neće imati niti jedan simptom. Većina ljudi koji imaju simptome nemaju pozitivne testove.

HG: Znam neke pojedince koji su to rekli. Rekli su: „Osećao sam se bolesno, a bio sam negativan na testu. Moja rođaka, koja se osećala odlično, bila je pozitivna na testu.“

DM: Uvek će biti tako. Uzročna veza koju su stvorili mediji, CDC i KOVID praćenje, a to je saradnja između Blumberg fondacije, Gejts fondacije, Zakerberg fondacije i drugih, zvanični brojevi koje zateknemo preko ekrana svakog jutra na našim računarima, na našim televizijama, ti brojevi namerno lažu. Oni su svesno lagali od nastanka ovoga. Ne postoji uzročno-posledična veza između ovih stvari koje nikada nisu utvrđene. Nikada nije bilo ni približno utvrđeno. Imamo situaciju u kojoj je iluzija problema u tome što ljudi kažu: „Ne želim da dobijem KOVID-19.“ Misle na to da ne žele da se zaraze virusom. Problem je u tome što te dve stvari nisu međusobno povezane.

Virusna infekcija nije dokumentovana u većini onoga što nazivaju slučajevima. Ne postoji osnov za takvu povezanost, osim za manipulaciju javnosti. To je prva polovina problema. Druga polovina problema je u tome što ono što se naziva vakcinacijom, što, kao što dobro znate kada neko kaže reč vakcinacija, javnost to razume kao da se lečite oslabljenim ili živim virusom ili fragmentom oslabljenog virusa i da je lečenje namenjeno sprečavanju zaraze i sprečavanju prenošenja infekcije, ono što vakcina u uobičajenoj definiciji vakcine treba da učini.

Problem je što, u slučaju Moderne i Fajzera (Pfizer), ovo nije vakcina. Ovo je genska terapija. To je hemoterapijsko sredstvo koje je genska terapija. To nije vakcina. Šta ona radi? Šalje lanac sintetičke RNK u ljudsko biće i u njemu priziva na stvaranje spajk proteina S1, koji je patogen. To je toksin u ljudskim bićima. Ovo ne samo da vas ne sprečava da se razbolite, već čini da vaše telo proizvodi ono od čega se razbolite.

HG: U tom smislu, to zvuči kao vakcina?

DM: Ne, nikako, jer bi vakcina trebalo da pokrene imunitet. Ne bi trebalo da pokrene u vama da proizvodite toksin.

HG: Tako se ovo razlikuje.

DM: Nije mala razlika. To uopšte nije isto. Ovo je javna manipulacija pogrešnim prikazivanjem kliničkog lečenja. To nije vakcinacija. To nije sprečavanje infekcije. To nije uređaj koji sprečava prenos. To je sredstvo uz koje je vaše telo prisiljeno da stvori toksin sa kojim se, navodno, vaše telo nekako navikne nositi, ali za razliku od vakcine, koja treba da pokrene imuni odgovor, ovo treba da pokrene stvaranje toksina.

HG: Način na koji sam čula da su kompanije govorile je da ovako naučite svoje telo da se bori protiv ovog virusa kada se pojavi. Tako oni to predstavljaju.

DM: Njihovo kliničko ispitivanje nije uključivalo ništa od toga, čak ni mogućnost unutar kliničkog ispitivanja. Kliničko ispitivanje nije merilo prisustvo ili odsustvo virusa ili fragmenta virusa. Kliničko ispitivanje nije merilo mogućnost suzbijanja prenosa, kliničko ispitivanje nije merilo nijednu od tih stvari. Ovo je slučaj pogrešnog predstavljanja tehnologije i to je učinjeno isključivo kako bi mogli da se stave pod okrilje zakona o javnom zdravstvu koji eksploatiše vakcinaciju.

HG: Ono što kažete razlikuje se od onoga što je većina nas čula u udarnim vestima, pa čak i u saopštenjima za štampu velikih kompanija.

DM: To je zato što ljudi ne čitaju stvarna klinička ispitivanja. Ako pročitate klinička ispitivanja, ništa od onoga što kažem nije nimalo različito. U stvari, same kompanije su rekle ono što ja govorim. Rekli su da ne mogu da testiraju postojanje ili odsustvo virusa i da ne mogu da testiraju prenosivost, jer su rekli da bi to bilo nepraktično. I same kompanije su priznale svaku stvar koju govorim, ali koriste javnu manipulaciju rečju vakcina da bi kooptirale javnost u verovanju da dobijaju nešto što ne dobijaju. Ovo vas neće sprečiti da dobijete koronavirus. To vas neće sprečiti da se razbolite. U stvari, naprotiv, mnogo češće ćete se razboljevati od samog virusa.

HG: Kako to možete reći tako sa sigurnošću?

DM: Zato što podaci pokazuju upravo to, jer ljudi koji su primili vakcinu, do vremena kada su primili drugu dozu, 80% tih ljudi imalo je jednu ili više kliničkih prezentacija KOVID-19, 80% ljudi koji imaju infekciju prema RT-PCR nisu imali simptome uopšte.

HG: Ljudi ga dobijaju više od „vakcine?“

DM: Da. Dobićete simptome KOVID-19 primanjem genske terapije predstavljene kao vakcina. Dobićete simptome KOVID-a u 80% slučajeva. Ako ste izloženi SARS-CoV-2 prema RT-PCR, u 80% slučajeva, uopšte nećete imati simptome.

HG: Koja je svrha dobijanja ove vakcine ili ove genske manipulacije kako je vi nazivate?

DM: To je tehnologija genske terapije. To je Modernina lična definicija. Držimo se onoga što kažu da jesu. Korist ne postoji. Ljudsko biće će biti potencijalno izloženo neklasifikovanim, i kratkoročnim i dugoročnim rizicima promene svoje RNK i DNK zbog izloženosti ovoj genskoj terapiji. Ovo je važno shvatiti, nema kliničke koristi, osim što je u određenim slučajevima infekcije CoV i / ili izloženosti KOVIDU-19 bilo nekoliko. Pod tim mislim na manje od nekoliko stotina od skoro 40.000 u kliničkom ispitivanju. Nekoliko stotina ljudi imalo je nekoliko dana slabije simptome kod genske terapije u poređenju sa drugom kontrolnom grupom. Čak i u tom poređenju, ako pogledate metodologiju koja se nalazi u objavljenim radovima za klinička ispitivanja, oni se igraju sa podacima, jer ono što rade je razdvajanje reaktivnosti, što znači način na koji osoba reaguje kada je izložena genskoj terapiji, odvajaju neželjene događaje od stvarnih simptoma KOVID-a.

Problem je što simptomi KOVID-a uključuju stvari poput groznice, bolova u telu, bolova u mišićima, slabosti u mišićima i slične stvari. Rešili su se velikog dela onoga što bi se moglo smatrati simptomima KOVID-a, nazivajući ih neželjenim događajima. Ako izvučete te podatke i kažete: „Uporedite populaciju koja je dobila gensku terapiju sa populacijom koja nije dobila gensku terapiju.“ Populacija koja je dobila gensku terapiju imala je mnogo više bolesti, uključujući simptome KOVID-19, nego populacija koja nije dobila genetsku terapiju, ali zato što su ogroman broj stvari klasifikovali kao neželjene događaje, tehnički su se zaneli i došli do ovih smešnih 90% plus efikasnost. Efikasnost nije bila efikasna u blokiranju bolesti. Bilo je efikasno u navodnom skraćivanju trajanja simptoma.

HG: Ljudi se plaše da su spremni da veruju u ono što žele da veruju i zadržavajući onaj delić informacija koje ste podelili, da će verovatnoća primene vakcine protiv gripa, „Bar ublažiti moje simptome i ograničiti trajanje moje bolesti.“ Drže se tog jednog delića informacija koji je bio manipulacija podacima, kao što kažete, i drže se nade da će ovo biti njihova spasonosna milost da im pomogne da izbegnu KOVID-19.

DM: Ništa od ovoga im neće pomoći da izbegnu KOVID-19 i ništa od ovoga im neće pomoći da izbegnu SARS-CoV-2.

HG: Govorili smo uglavnom o vakcini Moderna i Fajzer koje su genska terapija. Da li je još neka u izradi ili dolazi na tržište, koja ne koristi gensku terapiju?

DM: Ispitivanje AstraZeneca Oksford koristi virusni fragment. Više je u tehnološkom smislu onoga što bismo vi i ja mogli istorijski smatrati vakcinom. Ispitivanje AstraZeneca Oksford bilo je zanimljivo gledati, jer imaju problem sa metodologijom koji je prilično veliki izazov u pogledu pokušaja obmanjivanja podataka i razumevanja šta se dešava bilo sa strane bezbednosti ili efikasnosti. Razlog je jednostavan, jer u određenim slučajevima ispitivanje AstraZeneca Oksford nije koristilo kontrolnu grupu sa fiziološkim rastvorom. Koristili su drugu vakcinu kao kontrolu. Drugim rečima, namestili su karte. Čine da izgleda kao da su nekako neutralni u poređenju sa drugom vakcinacijom, u nekoliko svojih napora prikupljanja podataka.

Kao rezultat toga, imamo problem sa metodologijom, koji su usput kritikovali brojni klinički naučnici. Veći je problem što još uvek ne mere osetljivost na viruse i prenos virusa. To su dve noge stolice koje su potrebne svima da bi rekli da vakcinišu stanovništvo iz razloga javnog zdravlja. Ne postoji način na koji. Ovo je jednostavna stvar koju morate shvatiti. Kao kada bih rekao: „Svi moraju da uzimaju hemoterapiju zbog raka koji mogu dobiti.“

HG: Ljudi bi Vam se smejali u lice.

DM: Upravo se to događa. Ovo nije profilaktički. Ovo nam ne pomaže. Rečeno nam je da se podvrgnemo lečenju bolesti koju nemamo i najverovatnije je nećemo imati. Rečeno nam je da pažljivim marketinškim manipulacijama i propagandom nazivamo ove stvari vakcinama za javno zdravlje.

HG: U prošlosti smo ih uzimali iz tog razloga. „Nemam boginje. Ne želim da dobijem morbile, pa ću da primim ovu vakcinu protiv morbila. ” Naučeni smo da prihvatimo takav pristup.

DM: To je priča koju svako očekuje.

HG: Zašto to ne očekujete? Zbog čega ste zaronili duboko?

DM: To nije ono što se meri. To nije ono što se radi i ne radi se o ovoj tehnologiji. iRNK nije vakcinacija. To je genska terapija koja je prvobitno razvijena za lečenje karcinoma. Zbog toga koristim analogiju hemoterapije. Ovo nije vakcinacija.

HG: Imam kolege, sigurna sam da i Vi imate, prijatelje i poznanike koji će ići na to. Šta možemo reći tim ljudima ili podeliti sa njima što bi ih moglo probuditi?

DM: To je složeno pitanje i odavno sam odabrao da se ne bavim energijom buđenja uspavane metafore, jer činjenica je da su ljudi uslovljeni da reaguju na strah, to je refleksno i nije svesno. Ako ispitamo svoje ponašanje i ono što radimo je sebi na štetu, jer smo uvereni da je na jedan ili drugi način pred nama gora budućnost, to je nešto za šta nemam mogućnost da kažem da će činjenice ikada prevazići . U životu još nisam sreo nekoga ko je dozvolio da neka činjenica prevlada verovanjem. Jednom kada usvojite neko verovanje, činjenice nisu dobrodošle, jer ono što one čine, ne samo da optužuju vaše verovanje, već i energiju koju vi držite i koja kaže: „Moram da verujem u ono što mi je rečeno“.

Čim pokušate da stupite u kontakt sa činjenicama, sve što uradite je da pokrenete sukob. Ono što radim je da pokušavam da uzmem složenu nauku i složeno izveštavanje i trudim se da ona bude pristupačna i lako razumljiva. Cilj je da u određenim slučajevima ljudi kažu: „Ne mogu ni da verujem da je istina ono što je rekao.“ Dobra stvar je što ne morate verovati da je istina ono što kažem, jer ja ne vrednujem verovanje. Ja vrednujem objektivnu stvarnost činjenica. Ispostavilo se da je u ovom konkretnom slučaju jednostavno i otvoreno reći bilo kojoj osobi u Moderninoj sopstvenoj Komisiji za hartije od vrednosti, oni su to potpuno jasno stavili do znanja da je njihova tehnologija tehnologija genske terapije. U svom kliničkom ispitivanju, potpuno su jasno stavili do znanja da ne mogu meriti prisustvo ili odsustvo virusa i ne mogu meriti prisustvo ili odsustvo prenosa virusa. Svaka pojedinačna stvar koju su predstavljali da rade, a koja pogađa javno razumevanje šta je vakcinacija, izričito su rekli, „Oni to ne rade“.

HG: Bili ste pažljivi i izneli ste činjenice meni i publici i zahvalni smo. Želim da vas pitam na ličniji način, da li biste uopšte uradili ovaj PCR test ako biste morali na putovanje? Dobijam različite vrste e-mailova i ljudi me kontaktiraju, čak ni ne govorim o vakcini ili tehnologiji genske terapije, ali određene stvari su potrebne da bi se učestvovalo u životu.

DM: Aktivno sam uključen u mnoge značajne parnice koje pokušavaju da razotkriju zaveru koju pokreće PCR, kao i intervencije medicinske protivmere. U prethodnici sam sa još nekoliko duša koje se bore za prava građana da donose odluke zasnovane na činjenicama, a ne na propagandi. Činjenica je da PCR test nikada nije odobren kao dijagnostika. Nije dijagnostički. Ne postoji ništa u vezi sa izvođenjem PCR testa koji čini bilo šta drugo osim pojačavanja propagandnog narativa. Ne govori vam ništa.

Razlog zašto ne radimo testiranje na grip je taj što ne želimo da priznamo činjenicu da većina ljudi koji su u bolnici, koji su bolesni i koji umiru doživljavaju potpuno isto što se događalo svake godine, što je je bolest slična gripu, prehladi i pneumoniji. U mnogim slučajevima, kada neko ima kompromitovani imunitet ili drugi komorbiditet dovodi do smrtnih slučajeva. Tužna je stvarnost da se to događa, ali deo je ljudskog iskustva da se to događa. Činjenica je da PCR test neće postaviti ili neće potvrditi bilo koju dijagnozu, jer PCR testovi ne mogu potvrditi dijagnozu.

HG: Intervjuisala sam dr Toma Kauana i dr Endija Kaufmana, i oni kažu istu stvar. Osoba koja je smislila ili razvila PCR test kaže da se on ne treba koristiti za dijagnozu bilo čega.

DM: Kao i FDA, tako i svi ostali. Jedini razlog zašto koristimo PCR testove je taj što guverneri i Ministarstvo zdravlja i socijalne službe održavaju vanredno stanje. Onog trenutka kada se ukine to vanredno stanje u bilo kojoj državi ili zemlji, PCR test neće smeti da se koristi. Održavamo vanredno stanje kako bi proizvođači mogli da nastave da prodaju stvar koja nikada ne bi bila odobrena da je predmet kliničkog ispitivanja. To važi i za ono što se naziva vakcinama. Genska terapija koju Moderna i Fajzer rade, obe bi bile odmah suspendovane ako se vanredno stanje ukine. Ljudi ne razumeju da ako ukinete vanredno stanje, cela kuća od karata pada.

HG: To je nešto drugo za šta se vi i vaš tim zalažete?

DM: To je zato što autorizacija za upotrebu u hitnim slučajevima spada u vanredne situacije.

HG: Da li je ovo jedan od razloga, da li mislite da su klevetali hidroksihlorokin ili bilo koji drugi protokol koji bi mogao da leči simptome SARS-CoV-2?

DM: Bez pogovora. Ako pogledate istorijski, već dugi niz godina dr Antoni Fauci iz NIAID-a održava godišnji sastanak savetodavnog odbora. Svake godine on jadikuje nad činjenicom da pokušavaju da naprave ovu univerzalnu vakcinu protiv gripa, na koju se poziva kao na vakcinu za novorođenčad. Oni to pokušavaju godinama, ali nije uspelo. Ovo je prilika da Antoni Fauci dobije ono što nije uspeo da dobije pravnim sredstvima, a to je da želi da stigne do mesta gde primorava stanovništvo na vakcinu. Manipuliše ovom situacijom da bi primorao populaciju na vakcinu. Činjenica je da je zaboravio da bi, ako namerava da primora stanovništvo na vakcinu, to barem trebalo da bude vakcina.

HG: Koji bi bili njegovi motivi za to?

DM: Uvek je bio finansijski. Ulog su milijarde dolara, a NIAID je u suštini inkubator za farmaceutsku industriju. Služi blagajnicima koji su mu u NIAID-u u karijeri omogućili da upravlja 191 milijardom dolara.

HG: Ovde ima mnogo toga za razmotranje. Dali ste nam puno prostora za razmišljanje. Želimo ponovo da razgovaramo s vama, ali recimo da sam osoba koja je čitala sve ove činjenice i uverili ste me. Ne želim da dobijem ovu tehnologiju genske terapije. Ne želim čak ni da dobijem vakcinu AstraZeneca. Ne želim da dobijem ništa od ovoga, ali pod pritiskom sam zbog posla ili zbog putovanja, šta biste mi savetovali?

DM: Ne mogu uopšte nikoga da savetujem. To nije moja uloga, ali ono što vam mogu reći je da je ovo odluka koju će bilo koje ljudsko biće na kraju morati da donese na osnovu toga da li se ili ne odlučuje za život ili se odlučuje za robovanje. Ovo je kao u bilo kojoj tački istorije u kojoj morate donositi odluke koje se zasnivaju na onome što je moralno i etično i ispravno s obzirom na vaš osećaj odgovornosti i poslušnosti. Činjenica je kao da ste vezali sigurnosni pojas, kao da radite čitav niz drugih stvari, vaš izbor za bavljenje nekom aktivnošću na kraju će biti odluka sa kojom morate živeti.

Neću dodirnuti stvar i neću dozvoliti da moje telo napadne stvar koja je razvijena na neetičan i nezakonit način. Neću dozvoliti nikome da ima priliku da manipuliše mojim genetskim kodom. To se neće dogoditi. Ako to znači da to me to košta određenog poslodavca ili određene veze ili bilo čega drugog, moj život vredi više od toga. Uslovljeni smo da upadnemo u ovu zamku, koja glasi: „Možda nećemo uspeti da uđemo u avion.“ Dakle, vozite.

HG: Razmišljala sam o tome. Počeću da se vozim čamcem.

DM: Neću dozvoliti da moja budućnost i moja dobrobit budu robovi komercijalnom interesu koji pokušava da iznudi nešto od mene ili me uceni u nečemu.

HG: To zvuči kao život. To zvuči kao sloboda za razliku od ropstva. Cenim to. Mislim da je to ono što ćemo čuti u fondaciji. Želimo da ljudi žive najbolje što mogu, preuzimaju odgovornost za sopstveno zdravlje i traže načine da ga neguju, koji možda nije najmoderniji ili najisplativiji za zdravstvene kompanije, ali će biti najbolji za njih. Dozvolite mi da zaključim tako što ću vam postaviti pitanje koje često postavljam na kraju. Ako bi čitalac mogao učiniti jednu stvar da poboljša ili održi svoje zdravlje, šta biste mu preporučili?

DM: Izaberite pre svega promenu načina života i odaberite je sa nekim drugim. Počnite da vežbate, bavite se zdravijim načinom ishrane. Sve što uključuje spajanje osećaja blagostanja, što uključuje druženje, ishranu, vitalnost i osnaživanje vas samih da postanete osoba koja ima, ne samo konceptualnu ideju o tome šta je zdravlje, već ima i doživljeno iskustvo o tome. Što više imate proživljeno zdravstveno iskustvo, manje vam se može reći da se ne osećate dobro kada ste potpuno dobro.

HG: Hvala Vam puno na vašem vremenu, Dejvide. Ovo je bio sjajan razgovor.

DM: Zaista nema na čemu. Čuvajte se.

*

Transcendentna korupcija i korona virus prvi deo

Transcendentna korupcija i korona virus – drugi deo

Kovid: Suzbijanje naučnih kontra-narativa

Kovid vs grip: Gde je kosa, alatka Smrti, u 2020-2021?

*

Srbija

Čitajte na srpskom

Part of the ‘Covid Scientific Counter-Narratives’ series at this blog. The following interview, with Dr David Martin PhD, is consistent with the several other counter-narratives by scientists in the Covid 19 series.

*

Interview @ https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/

Archived @ https://archive.li/71A7x & @ https://archive.li/1sYyp

Dr. David Martin, founder and chairman of M-CAM Inc, challenges our presuppositions about the new mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. Quoting the pharmaceutical companies themselves, David suggests that these are not vaccines, but, in actuality, gene therapy. He explains what the vaccines may do to us, what they are promising they can do for us, and how to distinguish the difference.

The below transcript is the Hilda Gore interview with Dr. David Martin.

HG: I have friends who’ve gotten one of the new COVID-19 vaccines and you do too. These are the fastest developed vaccines in all of our medical history and many people are lining up to get them as soon as possible. What are they made of? What would they do to us? Why are they being promoted and by whom? This is episode 292 and our guest is Dr. David Martin. He received his Undergrad degree from Goshen College, Master’s of Science from Ball State University and Doctorate from the University of Virginia. He is an innovator, a professor, and a man with an extensive resume of accomplishments.

With David, we focused on the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. He goes over the major issues surrounding them. He reviews the mRNA technology and explains how it is gene therapy, not a vaccine and our usual understanding of the word. He reviews the problems with the PCR tests and even helps us understand our broader state of emergency. Finally, he explains how fear on a subconscious level can make us resist the truth.

Welcome to the show, David.

DM: Thank you. It’s lovely to be here.

HG: I have a friend that works in the school system. She got a letter suggesting that she’s an essential worker and that she needs to get this one of these new vaccines being developed against this COVID virus. What should she know before she goes for it?

DM: Let’s start with your opening sentence. None of the words in the order that you use exist in reality. Let’s unpack that. First of all, there is no vaccine that is in development or contemplated that is a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That doesn’t exist. That hasn’t been developed. It isn’t even, in 2021, in contemplation. It’s one of the unfortunate things about what’s going on in the propaganda war, which is in February, the World Health Organization made it abundantly clear that SARS-CoV-2 or the virus and COVID-19, which is a series of clinical presentations of illness were two distinct things.

HG: You’re making an interesting distinction. I have heard that SARS-CoV-2 is “the virus” and that COVID-19 is the disease. Is that what you’re saying?

DM: COVID 19 is not a disease. It is a series of clinical symptoms. It is a giant umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases. The problem that we have is that in February, the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between the two of these things. One is a virus, in their definition and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The illusion in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-19. The problem with that definition and with the expectation is that the majority of people who test positive using the RT-PCR method for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2 are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus causes a disease fell apart. That’s the reason why they invented the term asymptomatic carrier.

HG: In other words, I might get a positive result from this PCR test and the reason I’m not asymptomatic, what’s happening is I’m not sick at all. They’ve made a false assumption that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19.

DM: That’s never been the case, never has been the case and never will be the case. There is a causal statement that is made in the media where, for example, Johns Hopkins or the COVID tracker platform or any of these things has intentionally misled the people. There are not 5,000 new cases in Virginia. There potentially may be several thousand positive PCR tests but most of the people who have a positive test will never have a single symptom. Most of the people who have symptoms do not have positive tests.

HG: I know some individuals who said that thing. They were like, “I was feeling sick and I got a negative test. My sister-in-law, who was feeling great, got a positive test.”

DM: It will always be the case. The causal link that the media, the CDC made and the COVID tracker, which is the collaboration between the Bloomberg Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Zuckerberg Foundation and others, the official numbers that we get traped across the screens every morning of our computers in our televisions, those numbers are willfully lying. They have been willfully lying since the inception of this. There is not a causal link between these things that have never been established. It has never even been close to established. We have a situation where the illusion of the problem is that people say, “I don’t want to get COVID-19.” What they mean is they don’t want to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not related to each other.

A viral infection hasn’t been documented in the majority of what is called cases. There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That’s the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination, which as you well know when somebody says the word vaccination, the public understanding is that you are being treated with an attenuated or alive virus or a fragment of an attenuated and that the treatment is meant to keep you from getting an infection and it is meant to keep you from transmitting the infection that vaccine in the common definition of a vaccine is meant to do.

The problem is that in the case of Moderna and Pfizer, this is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy. It’s a chemotherapy agent that is gene therapy. It is not a vaccine. What is this doing? It’s sending a strand of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen. It’s a toxin inside of human beings. This is not only not keeping you from getting sick, it’s making your body produce the thing that makes you sick.

HG: In that sense, it does sound like a vaccine?

DM: No, not at all because a vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It’s not supposed to trigger you to make a toxin.

HG: That’s how this differs.

DM: It’s not somewhat different. It’s not the same at all. This is a public manipulation of misrepresentation of clinical treatment. It’s not a vaccination. It’s not a prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.

HG: The way I’ve heard the companies put it is this is to teach your body to fight this virus when it comes around. That’s how they’re presenting it.

DM: Their clinical trial didn’t include any of that as even a possibility within the clinical trial. The clinical trial did not measure the presence or absence of a virus or a virus fragment. The clinical trial did not measure the possibility of transmission suppression, the clinical trial didn’t measure any of those things. This is a case of misrepresentation of technology and it’s done exclusively so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination.

HG: What you’re saying is different from what most of us have heard in the mainstream news and even from the press releases from big companies.

DM: That’s because people aren’t reading the actual clinical trials. If you read the clinical trials, nothing that I’m saying is even remotely different. As a matter of fact, the companies themselves have said what I’m saying. They said, they could not test for the existence or absence of the virus and they could not test for the transmissivity because they said it would be impractical. The companies themselves have admitted to every single thing I’m saying but they are using the public manipulation of the word vaccine to co-opt the public into believing they’re getting a thing, which they are not getting. This is not going to stop you from getting Coronavirus. It’s not going to stop you from getting sick. In fact, on the contrary, it will make you sick far more often than the virus itself.

HG: How can you say that so definitively?

DM: Because the data is nothing but that, for people receiving by the time they got the second shot, 80% of people had one or more clinical presentations of COVID-19, 80% of people who have an infection according to RT-PCR have no symptoms at all.

HG: People are getting it more from the “vaccine?”

DM: Yes. You will get COVID-19 symptoms from getting the gene therapy passed off as a vaccine. You will get COVID symptoms from that 80% of the time. If you’re exposed to SARS-CoV-2 according to RT-PCR, 80% of the time, you will have no symptoms at all.

HG: What is the purpose of getting this vaccine or this gene manipulation as you call it?

DM: It’s a gene therapy technology. That’s Moderna’s own definition. Let’s stick with what they say they are. The benefit is non-existent. A human being is going to be potentially exposed to unclassified, both short-term and long-term risks of altering their RNA and DNA from exposure to this gene therapy. This is important to understand, there is no clinical benefit except that in certain instances of CoV infection and/or COVID-19 exposure, there were a few. By that, I mean less than a few hundred out of nearly 40,000 in the clinical trial. A few hundred people had a few days less severe symptoms with the gene therapy when compared to the other control group. Even in that comparison, if you look at the methodology that’s in the published papers for the clinical trials, they play games with the data because what they’re doing is, they’re separating reactivity, meaning the way in which a person responds to being exposed to the gene therapy, they separate out adverse events from actual COVID symptoms.

The problem is that COVID symptoms include things like fever, body ache, muscle pain, muscle weakness and things like that. They got rid of a lot of what would have been considered to be COVID symptoms by calling them adverse events. If you pull that data out and you say, “Compare the population that got the gene therapy with the population that didn’t get the gene therapy.” The population that got the gene therapy had way more illness, including COVID-19 symptoms, than the population that didn’t get the gene therapy but because they classified an enormous number of things as adverse events, they technically wiggled themselves into what was this ridiculous 90% plus effectiveness. Effectiveness was not effective in blocking illness. It was effective in allegedly shortening the duration of symptoms.

HG: People are afraid that they are ready to believe what they want to believe and holding onto that one bit of information that you shared, that the likelihood with the flu vaccine, “At least it will tamp down my symptoms and limit the duration of my illness.” They held onto that one bit of information that was data manipulation, as you’re saying and they’re holding out hope that this will be their saving grace to help them avoid COVID-19.

DM: Nothing about this will avoid COVID-19 and nothing about this will avoid SARS-CoV-2.

HG: We’ve been talking mostly about the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine that is gene therapy. Is there another one in the works or getting to the market that is not using gene therapy?

DM: The AstraZeneca Oxford trial is using a viral fragment. It is more along the technological lines of what you and I might consider historically, to be a vaccine. The AstraZeneca Oxford trial has been an interesting one to watch because they have a methodology problem that is quite challenging in terms of trying to fool data and understand what’s happening either on the safety or efficacy side. The reason is simple, that in certain instances, the AstraZeneca Oxford trial has not used a saline control group. They’ve used another vaccine as the control. In other words, they’ve stacked the deck. They’re making it look like they are somehow neutral compared to another vaccination in several of their data collection efforts.

As a result of that, we have both a methodology problem, which by the way, has been criticized by a number of clinical scientists. The bigger problem is that they’re still not measuring viral susceptibility and viral transmission. Those are the two legs of the stool that is required for anyone to say that they are vaccinating a population for public health reasons. There is no means by which. This is a simple thing to wrap your head around. If I said, “Everybody needs to take chemotherapy for cancer they might get.”

HG: People would laugh in your face.

DM: That’s exactly what is happening. This is not prophylactic. This is not helping us. We’re being told to take a treatment for a disease we don’t have and most likely will not have. We’re being told that using careful marketing manipulation and propaganda, calling these things vaccines for public health.

HG: Historically vaccines, we’ve taken them for that reason. “I don’t have the measles. I don’t want to get the measles, so I’m going to get this measles shot.” We’ve been primed to accept that approached.

DM: That’s the narrative everybody expects.

HG: Why don’t you expect that though? What’s made you dive deep?

DM: That’s not what’s being measured. That’s not what’s being done and that’s not what this technology is about. mRNA is not a vaccination. It’s a gene therapy that was originally developed for cancer treatment. That’s why I’m using the chemotherapy analogy. This is not a vaccination.

HG: I have colleagues, I’m sure you do too, friends and acquaintances who are going for it. What can we tell these people or share with them that might wake them up?

DM: That’s a complex issue and I have chosen a long time ago to not engage in the energy of this waking sleeping metaphor because the fact of the matter is if people are conditioned to react to fear, this is reflexive and it’s not conscious. If we examine our behavior and what we do is engage in self-harm because we are convinced that somehow or another, there’s a worse future ahead of us, that’s something that I don’t have an ability to say facts are going ever to overcome. I have yet to meet in my life someone who allowed a fact to overwhelm a belief. Once you’ve adopted a belief, facts are not welcome because what they do is, they not only indict your belief but they indict the energy that you hold that says, “I have to believe what I’m told.”

The minute you try to engage with facts, all you do is trigger conflict. What I do is I try to take the complex science and the complex reporting, and I try to make it accessible and easily understood. The goal is that in certain instances, people will go, “I can’t even believe that what he said was true.” The cool thing is you don’t have to believe what I’m saying is true because I don’t value belief. I value the objective reality of facts. It turns out that in this particular case, it is simple and straightforward to say to any person in Moderna’s own SEC filings, they make it abundantly clear that their technology is a gene therapy technology. In their clinical trial, they’ve made it abundantly clear that they could not measure the presence or absence of the virus and they could not measure the presence or the absence of the transmission of the virus. Every single thing that they represented to be doing that preys on the public understanding of what vaccination is, they explicitly said, “They’re not doing that.”

HG: You have been careful to lay out the facts to me and the audience and we’re thankful. I want to ask you on a more personal note, would you even take this PCR test if you had to for travel? I’m getting all kinds of emails and people reaching out to me and I’m not even talking about the vaccine or the gene therapy technology but certain things are being required to participate in life.

DM: I’m actively involved with many of the significant pieces of litigation that are going on to try to unmask the conspiracy that is driving both the PCR, as well as the medical countermeasure interventions. I’m at the vanguard with a few other souls who are fighting for the rights of citizens to make decisions informed by facts, not informed by propaganda. The fact of the matter is the PCR test has never been approved as a diagnostic. It is not diagnostic. There’s nothing about taking a PCR test that does anything other than reinforce a propaganda narrative. It doesn’t tell you anything.

The reason why we’re not doing influenza testing is that we don’t want to admit the fact that the majority of people who are in hospital, who are sick and who are dying are experiencing exactly the same thing that’s happened every year, which is influenza-like, flu-like and pneumonia-like illness. In many cases, when someone has immune compromise or other comorbidities leads to fatalities. It’s a sad reality that that happens but it is part of the human experience that it happens. The fact is that a PCR test is not going to make or not make a confirmed diagnosis of anything because PCR tests cannot confirm a diagnosis.

HG: I’ve interviewed Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andy Kaufman, and they say the same thing. The person who came up with or developed the PCR test says that it’s not to be used to diagnose anything.

DM: So does the FDA so does everybody else. The only reason we are using PCR tests is that governors and the Department of Health and Human Services are maintaining a state of emergency. The second that that state of emergency is lifted in any state or in the country, the PCR test won’t be allowed to be used. We’re maintaining a state of emergency so that manufacturers can keep selling a thing that would never be approved if it was subject to a clinical trial. It goes for what’s being called vaccines too. The gene therapy that Moderna and Pfizer are doing, both of those would be suspended immediately if the state of emergency got lifted. People don’t understand that if you lift the state of emergency, the whole house of cards falls.

HG: That is something else that you and your team are advocating for?

DM: It’s because the emergency use authorization falls with the state of emergency.

HG: Is this one reason, do you think that they have cast aspersions on hydroxychloroquine or any other protocols that could possibly treat the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2?

DM: There’s no question. If you look historically, for many years, Dr. Anthony Fauci at NIAID has held his annual advisory committee meeting. Every year he laments the fact that they’re trying to build this universal influenza vaccine, which he refers to using as an infant in-print vaccine. They’ve been trying to do this for years and it hasn’t worked. This happens to be an opportunity for Anthony Fauci to get what he has not been able to get through legal means, which is he wants to get to a place where he forces a vaccine on a population. He’s manipulating this situation to force a vaccine on a population. The fact of the matter is he forgot that if he’s going to force a vaccine on a population, it should at least be a vaccine.

HG: What would his motives be for that?

DM: Always has been financial. There are billions of dollars at stake and NIAID is essentially the incubator for the pharmaceutical industry. He’s serving the paymasters that have let him manage $191 billion in his career at NIAID.

HG: There are lots to consider here. You’ve given us a lot of food for thought. We want to have another conversation with you again but let’s say I’m an individual that was reading all these facts and I’ve been persuaded. I do not want to get this gene therapy technology. I don’t want even to get the AstraZeneca vaccine. I don’t want to get any of this but I’m under pressure either because of my job or for travel purposes to do so, what would you advise me to do?

DM: I can’t advise a person at all. That’s not my role but what I can tell you is that this is a decision that any human being is going to ultimately have to make based on whether or not they choose to live or they choose to be enslaved. This is like any point in history where you have to make decisions that are based on what is moral and ethical and right with respect to your own sense of responsibility and accountability. The fact of the matter is like wearing a seat belt, like doing a whole bunch of other things, your choice to engage in an activity is ultimately going to be a decision that you have to live with.

I will not touch a thing and I will not allow my body to be invaded with a thing that is been developed in an unethical and illegal way. I am not going to let anybody have the opportunity to manipulate my genetic code. It’s not going to happen. If that means that it comes at a cost of a particular employer or a particular relationship or whatever else, my life happens to be worth more than that. We’ve been conditioned to fall into this trap, which is, “We might not be able to get on a plane.” So, drive.

HG: I thought about that. I’m going to start taking a boat.

DM: I’m not going to let my future and my well-being be enslaved to a commercial interest that is trying to extort or blackmail me into a thing.

HG: That does sound like living. That does sound like freedom as opposed to slavery. I appreciate that. I think that’s what we’re about to hear at the foundation. We want people to live their best lives to take responsibility for their own health and look to ways to nurture it that may not be the most modern or the most profitable for health companies but will be best for them. Let me wrap up by asking you the question I often pose at the end. If the reader could do one thing to improve or sustain their health, what would you recommend that they do?

DM: Pick a lifestyle modification first and foremost and pick it with someone else. Begin exercising, engage in a more wholesome way of engaging with the food you consume. Anything that involves bringing together the sense of wellbeing, which involves fellowship, nutrition, vitality and empowering you to become a person who not only has a conceptual idea of what health is but has a lived experience of it. The more you have the lived experience of health, the less you can be told you’re unwell when you’re perfectly fine.

HG: Thank you so much for your time, David. This has been a great conversation.

DM: You are most welcome. Take care.

Related:

Covid: Scientific Counter-Narratives

Covid scientific counter-narrative links to information provided by front-line doctors and top scientific researchers from universities and other institutions that are suppressed by algorithms at google search and have been censored at Facebook, Twitter, Youtube & LinkedIn.  If it appears any of the links have been scrubbed from the net, copy the link location (control + click with a macbook on any link below) and enter it into the search-bar at https://archive.li/ (where the articles are backed up.) This list is frequently updated. The first three articles are my own, most of the rest (with a few exceptions) are either external links or journalism republished at ronaldthomaswest.com.

When Western Culture Turned to Cannibalism

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part one

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part two

Vaccinated Dropping Dead in Scotland: Official Statistics

Delta Variant in India: No Worse Than a Common Cold

CDC Notice: PCR Test Goes to Trash (see Gates & Soros)

Gates & Soros to Buy Covid Testing Company

Forensic Analysis: 9,000 Vaccine Deaths Should be 45,000

PCR False Positives Big Problem in Australia

USA New Trend: More Deaths From Vaccine Than Covid

UK New Trend: More Cases in Vaccinated Than Unvaccinated

Pfizer Ex-VP: “Fact-Checkers Pack of Lies”

Dr Martin’s Fauci/Covid Criminal Dossier (pdf 205 pages)

PCR Tests Accuracy Debunked (again)

EUA (experimental) Vaccines Violate Nuremberg Ethics 

Canada Fires Another Top Doctor for Raising Questions

Pfizer Manipulated Vaccine Protocols for Children

USA Senator: Suppression of Vaccine Deaths in Media

Politics of Ivermectin in Indonesia

18-39? AstraZeneca Twice as Likely to Kill You as Covid

Fear Mongers vs Delta Variant kills 0.08% of Unvaccinated

Countless Holes in the Official Covid Narrative (the long read)

Lisbon court: 0.9% (152) covid deaths, not the 17,000 claimed (pdf)

1.5 Million Vaccine Injuries, 15,000+ Deaths in EU (1/2 of Europe)

Top Medical Professor Fired for Questioning Vaccinating Children

Inventor of mRNA censored at Youtube for saying “ivermectin”

Moderna mRNA Vaccine Developed Before Covid Outbreak

Asymptomatic Covid Spread Alarm Was False

Science Breakthrough: How Ivermectin Works on Covid

PhD in Immunology censored at Youtube

India Lawsuit Against WHO Chief Scientist (pdf)

India Bar Association Sues WHO Chief Scientist

Corrupt WHO Pushes Back on Ivermectin in India

India Court Over-rules WHO, Allows Ivermectin

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Mexico City

Pfizer’s Own Research Reveals mRNA Vaccine deadly

Suppressing Ivermectin Has Killed 1/2 Million (to May 2021)

John Hopkins Professor: 1/2 of Americans are immune

The Drug That Cracked Covid (pdf file)

CDC Data 12,000% Increase in Deaths With EUA Vaccines

Another 160 Experts Say Stop the Experimental Jabs

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Delhi

How Corruption Suppresses Ivermectin

Paper by 57 Scientists: Stop EUA Vaccinating Now

Bill Gates Protects Big Pharma Profits on Covid Vaccines

More on mRNA Experimental Vaccine

Top Yale University Researcher: Ivermectin Kills Covid

Covid vs Flu: Where is the Grim Reaper’s Scythe in 2020-2021?

Covid: Suppression of Scientific Counter-Narratives

mRNA: “It’s Gene Therapy, Not A Vaccine” David Martin, PhD

We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April by Dr Marty Makary (Johns Hopkins)

Treat Your Own Covid by John Day MD

Beating covid with generic drugs

The Great Barrington Declaration on covid

Fear is the Killer on covid

PCR False Positives (Study: Ten Fatal Flaws)

Propaganda & Corona Virus

*

Covid 19

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Capitol |ˈkapitl| (usu. the Capitol)

1 the temple of Jupiter on the Capitoline Hill in ancient Rome.
2 the seat of the US Congress in Washington, DC.

ORIGIN from Old French capitolie, later reassimilated to Latin Capitolium (from capit- ‘head’)

Well, boys & girls (or unisex, gender neutral ‘girlie-boys’ for the ‘woke’), we all thought democracy was a scintillating or capital idea. But, you-know, that empire thing grabbed it by the balls…

“The extension of the empire has meant the growth of private fortunes. This is nothing new, indeed it is in keeping with the most ancient history” -Gaius Asinius Gallus (from Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome)

The 1st message that should be drawn from the USA’s ‘capitol convulsion’ is ‘color of law’ simply cannot be made to work. Any pretense of the jurists notwithstanding, an immense body of law (practically everything of significance since the National Security Act of 1947) that merely wears the make-up of  constitutional conformity, like Nancy Pelosi’s cosmetics cannot conceal the mental decay that comes with her age, is a deceit doomed to fail. It’s a bit like the USA’s satellite, the European Union, with it’s 40 paid corporate lobbyists for each European Member of Parliament sitting in Brussels, where ‘Capital’ (greed) runs these empire provinces and the ‘circus’ (examples given, National Football League in the USA, Champions League in Europe) is no longer sufficient distraction from the fact there is no reinvestment in the people (social infrastructure) necessary to maintain a spine’s healthy posture. Rather government has morphed into a corporate exoskeleton where the people’s ‘representatives’ resemble so many locusts.

The next ‘1st message’ is, when the judiciary altogether abdicates examining the USA’s history of vote fraud (it’s not like this is something that had never happened) in the modern context of hacked computers and malware, it should not be merely anticipated, but expected, there will be a perfectly predictable next act in this regard. In fact there can be no legitimate winners until the computerized vote tally is altogether jettisoned for old fashioned, publicly observed, hand counts of legitimate paper ballots because in fact both sides have a history of vote fraud and now computerized vote fraud. Unfortunately, at this point any authentic vote count is a band-aid fix that could actually intensify/magnify the societal problems in what amounts to a hopelessly sundered republic where the people have been so pervasively lied to, for so long, there are two entirely separate & artificial realities, with either side incapable of grasping neutral facts beyond the borders of their own cultural myths.

The ‘1st message’ after that is, this ain’t over folks. We’re merely (momentarily) lucky it was not ‘the shoe on the other foot.’ If it’d been antifa had stormed the Capitol, they’d have burned it down like a Soros worshiping Tory mob’s ‘liberal democracy’ troops (something that last happened in 1814.) So, then, Trump’s twitter & facebook accounts are suspended when he’s been using social media for asking his supporters to stand down and go home? Do you actually believe, were the shoe on the other foot (the Biden ‘victory’ overturned), antifa would have listened to similar message or Dorsey & ‘Suckerberg’ would have suspended the accounts of Pelosi, Shumer, Biden or Harris?

Now, when the ‘new’ (old guard) insects go after Trump with a vindictive determination and a muzzled Trump cannot say ‘don’t do this’ to his supporters in circumstance where the red states’ conservatives are being driven to a deeply superstitious conservatism of a distant past due to a real subliminal fear of a ‘liberal’ cultural revolution being imposed upon them; and the blue states’ liberals are becoming radicalized into intolerant ‘woke’ because they perceive a revanchist conservatism threat imposing what they consider are archaic social values on themselves in turn, what happens? In the corrupt circumstance of corporate locusts running the government, no matter which side prevails, the police state wins (until it all finally, convincingly & overwhelmingly tears itself apart.)

 

Ronald’s 2021 State of the Union part 2

Sedition & Insurgents                    part 3

Mary Shelley’s ‘Intelligence’         part 4

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

 

© Copyright 2020 by Ronald Thomas West

Unpublished draft manuscript. This draft chapter for inclusion in ‘A Tribal Perspective Pre-Columbian Concept Translated to Modern: Radical Ethnographic Contrasts & Related Politics of Collusion’ (a nearly completed work in progress) may be reproduced for educational & research purposes. For profit & mass paper media redistribution prohibited. Send inquiries, questions & private comments to:

penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

 

Natural Selection for Autistic Traits

“For the Western world, the Schumann resonance represents the frequency of the Earth’s electromagnetic field. It has always concentrated at 7.83 Hz, with few variations since 1952, but in June 2014 there was a change. This when the Russian Space Observatory System showed a sudden increase in activity with a varied elongation from 8.5 Hz to 16.5 Hz.

“The researchers were amazed at these values, something that had never been recorded that way. More recently, other peaks have been detected, increasing the planet’s frequency to more than 30 Hz. It is concluded that these changes clearly show that the planet is changing. Some scholars also believe that humans, when acting on a “collective consciousness” level, can affect the structure of the magnetic field.

“This speculation is based on the fact that Schumann’s frequency is “in tune” with the human brain states alpha and theta. These increasing resonances correspond, of course, to the activity of human brain waves, which means that the Earth would be adjusting its frequency of vibration”

The scientific observation taken together with the proposed conclusion…

“Some scholars also believe that humans, when acting on a “collective consciousness” level, can affect the structure of the magnetic field”

…poses problems at several levels, mostly with undesirable outcome.

Undesirable, that is, if you are a stakeholder in the future of humanity. This is because, when humanity has become a cancer upon the cosmos, humanity will be written off by the cosmos like the Western science writes off and discards a failed laboratory experiment. You don’t believe this? That’s fine, the Cartesian-Platonic mentality may then approach the larger points in what follows as a social science fiction, in which the ‘brighter’ minds of Western culture might find some real entertainment value.

To begin, “… scholars also believe that humans, when acting on a “collective consciousness” level, can affect the structure…” or physical characteristics and behavior of the planet itself but this information is isolated or ‘exiled’ from mainstream, recalling theoretical physicist d’Espagnat’s largely (one is tempted to say ‘entirely’) ignored…

“The doctrine that the world is made up of objects whose existence is independent of human consciousness turns out to be in conflict with quantum mechanics and with facts established by experiment”

…pointing directly to the lived unreality of Western science; where its own quantum mechanics has directly established the foundation of Western science itself (objectivity) is patently mistaken. Yet these scientists go on ‘building’ on the now proven to be false assumption of ‘objectivity’ while behaving as though in polite company one dare not mention the aroma of a particularly pungent fart. In short, the most ‘primal & salient’ fact is ignored.

What to do with a culture that is capable of tattooing a swastika on its forehead and denying there could be any perceptual problem with it?

Now, we will have a brief look at some comparative oddities in relation to the ‘other’ intelligence, the so-called ‘primitive’ or pre-Western (pre-Indo-European, pre-civilized) environment giving rise to indigenous thought.

“Both solitary mammals and autistic individuals are low on measures of gregariousness, socialization, direct gazing, eye contact, facial expression, facial recognition, emotional engagement, affiliative need and other social behaviors. The evolution of the neurological tendencies in solitary species that predispose them toward being introverted and reclusive may hold important clues for the evolution of the autism spectrum and the natural selection of autism genes”

What is interesting in this preceding quote from ‘Conceptualizing the Autism Spectrum in Terms of Natural Selection and Behavioral Ecology: The Solitary Forager Hypothesis’ is the fact it simply and accurately describes the behavior of any individual with intact pre-Columbian mental structure removed from their cosmos or social foundation. You can still see this behavior today; take just about any one of the more culturally intact Native American Indians described in the chapter ‘Stick Game (The Witches)’ out of that highly vibrant, community social interaction, and place them, for instance, in any Western setting of personal ego projection such as a large party, and the Indian’s behavior would present just as described in autism.

This phenomenon of two entirely different Indians in one person is reflected in the American frontier stereotype of the ‘taciturn’ Indian where the one side only had been observed; that stone-faced (expressionless) ‘savage’ that did not look at you, rather past or through you and has nothing to say.

Relevant to the preceding is the experience of the modern American lawyer, when laws had changed allowing these non-tribal law advocates to practice in today’s tribal (imposed Western) courts. “You can’t read them” was the initial reaction of the White lawyers during the procedure of jury selection; where the opposing sides are entitled to question and move to dismiss prospective jurors. This recalls the expressionless (stone) faces of the players hiding the bones at the Stick Game while ‘looking through’ the game pointer in the midst of a social event that otherwise exhibits anything except symptoms of autism; vibrant, alive, affiliative, in every sense social.

This brings up a question; how is it people who are perfectly, normally functional in their own social setting actually appear to manifest classic symptoms of autism in certain circumstance and generally elsewhere?

One factor is training. Generation upon generation of training that is finally become millennia of socialization that is uniquely different to Western; simply described as ‘there is no pretense to understand and know what is unknown.’ “I don’t know you” explains it all. There is no posturing, no social niceties involving deceits or hypocrisy concealing environmental ignorance.

Here it could be noted there had been no lie involved in the indigenous ‘mating game’ when contrasted to Western culture where one or both parties ‘put on’ their ‘best face’ (lie) in a courtship that too often sees the liar relax into their actual (inferior) selves once the ‘hook has been set’ and the romance morphs into a typical dysfunctional nightmare of ‘marriage.’ In the Native way, mating was established via consistently growing a mutually respectful friendship that is honest from the outset; in a culture where millennia of developing truthful reporting had been paramount to survival.

Related to the preceding is the fact facial recognition comes second to knowledge; knowledge of kinship in the first instance, that is to say immersion in one’s community (cosmos) determines whether you are recognized or able to recognize others; a survival ‘technique’ evolved to weed out danger that perfectly mimics autism. Without an established sense of kinship, when dislocated from one’s community, facial recognition is shut down by the brain where other, more important factors take over, threat assessment is paramount. Facial recognition, finally, is assigned to persons with certain qualities in an environment one knows & understands.

At least, that is the end result. But there is more (there is always more but this book will conclude soon, everything must end someday, somewhere.)

“Infrasound frequencies can .. enter the brain without passing through the hearing organ, entraining the brainwave rhythm into an Alpha-Theta state”

This preceding quote, from the study ‘Fireplace and Holy Altar in Curiceta at Apuan Alps, Italy’, demonstrates ‘pre-civilized’ peoples separated by vast distances were aware of the alpha-theta states’ relationship to physical reality in a macro-cosmic sense. The so-called (by the Western culture) ‘altered’ states of consciousness had been an integral part and parcel of cognitive human intelligence development since the dawn of time; and only recently became finally subverted since Plato’s misapprehension of reality (objectivity via Western science) had overtaken the world. What is this modern mentality missing, where is the organic deficit to be identified?

“Their ability to keep time gives them an intuitive understanding of the rhythmic patterns they perceive all around them”

Or so it is asserted by the article ‘The Neuro-Science of Drumming’ which goes on to note:

“…drumming ultimately has therapeutic value, providing the emotional and physical benefits collectively known as “drummer’s high,” an endorphin rush that can only be stimulated by playing music, not simply listening to it. In addition to increasing people’s pain thresholds, Oxford psychologists found, the endorphin-filled act of drumming increases positive emotions and leads people to work together in a more cooperative fashion”

Do the Western cultures ‘collectively’ drum? Other than some minority (very small) movements of ‘feminized’ Western masculine mentalities, along the lines of the phony anthropology movement generated by Robert Bly, not really. Besides, what would the split psyche of the Indo-European do with the so-called ‘shamanic’ (New Age, actually) drumming into the theta state? Insofar as a practical matter, the Western shaped individual ego drumming into altered state doesn’t come any closer to reality than an adolescent boy masturbating to pornography; the endorphin rush is a fleeting high and that’s the all of it. They experience orgasm and it’s done, the story’s end.

The misassumptions are astounding wherein another article’s title asserts ‘Experiment Proves Why Staying In Tune With The Earth’s Pulse Is Key To Our Well Being’ whilst noting:

“the frequency of the earth was an exact match with the frequency of the human brain”

The automatic assumption is the Earth is providing the pulse, not the reverse, but in fact the collective drive of human consciousness is perfectly (or imperfectly, as the case may be) capable of establishing (or corrupting, as the case may be) the Earth’s frequency and this brings us to ‘Native’ drumming and how it differs from that of the Western assumptions. Rather the article’s title might have been ‘keeping ourselves tuned to a healthy pulse is key to the Earth’s wellbeing’ or highlighting that pesky problem Western culture has with assuming responsibility where all is not forgiven.

Excepting certain forms of Stick Game, e.g. a form historically related to training for manhunting in inter-tribal combats (devolved into gambling), altogether differing from other forms such as intra-tribal dispute resolution, an indigenous COLLECTIVE mentality drums into a single COLLECTIVE conscious state where it is perfectly understood by this COLLECTIVE intelligence that this is NOT an ‘altered’ state (Western concept) but an enhanced state of creating reality that is typical of everyday life. Most indigenous ceremony, with its attending drumming, is as simple as recalibration, or fine tuning to the concept of life itself, in all of its larger complexity, to what is invariably demanded to be sensible outcome for the whole of the cosmos. Robert Bly’s Jungian ‘wild man’ notwithstanding, there is precisely zero individual imperative can become part of this.

In the fall of 1983, I was listening to a couple of four year old Indian kids who were Blackfeet Head Start Program (preschool) classmates. They were ‘arguing’ (if it can be called that) over a girl at school. The one kid finally said “There’s nothing can be done about it, she chose me.” The other boy’s reply was “I’d punch you out, but you’re my best friend.”

It was a recent communication with one of those kids, these days a ‘light skinned Indian’ immersed in the dominant culture where people automatically assume he is ‘white’, recalled the conversation.

This acquaintance had now related to me his cross-cultural experience of discovering the well adapted psychopath is the sanest person one could know in the Western culture, nearly everyone else, at some level, seems to be loud, space invading aliens, or worse, energy draining ‘emo traps’ in close relationships of most sort, whether at work, in so-called ’friendships’ or otherwise. The socially well adapted psychopaths weren’t trapped in affective empathy or its’ close relative, sympathy. This tripped some sort of switch in my head and I started looking more closely at an inter-cultural cultural phenomenon that is a radical contrast I’ve yet to see written about anywhere: Why is it Native American Indians grieve from the belly as opposed to ‘white people’ (Western mentalities generally) grieve from the heart? Moreover, the Indians seldom grieve but when they do, it makes the Westerner’s grieving look like ‘mourning lite.’ Meanwhile, the stereotype is the primitive, ‘stoic Indian’ versus ‘civilized humanity.’

Now, back to the kids. That very short conversation, of which I’ve only given the last two sentences before the subject was dropped and the kids’ play moved on to other subject, points to a process in cultural shaping that more resembles training to be well adjusted, culturally integrated psychopaths than anything else (from Western psychology point of view.) In the Indians, LOYALTY TO YOUR FRIENDSHIPS (a clone of the socially well adjusted psychopath’s unwavering-unforgiving loyalty demand in close association) in community is paramount and supersedes all else in governing oneself in relation to everything in one’s human social surroundings. “There’s nothing to be done about it, she chose me” is the end of the story, no broken heart is experienced by the second kid, there is no ‘affective’ anything, no real anger, no self-pity. Preserving the loyalty and respect entailed in authentic friendship (indistinguishable from kinship) is paramount.

What’s more is, practical friendship (experienced as a principled, hyper-respectful and ethics driven loyalty in the Indian social experience) governs conjugal relationships as well, Western romance is an alien and strange concept that finds no traction in the culturally intact native community.

The ancient indigenous culture provides ZERO space for self pity or any emotion that is supportive of sympathy in a Western sense. In the true native pidgin English, the word ‘pity’ is purely and only pejorative. In a cultural philosophy of what works versus what doesn’t work (as opposed the moralizing ‘right & wrong’) feeling sorry for people is a non-starter.

No excuses! Does this mean the ‘stoic Indian’ doesn’t mature into a being experiencing emotion? Well, yes and no, let’s say (if only to be brief in this moment) they’re wired differently and emotion is triggered differently, experienced differently and utilized differently.

As it happened, when this line of thinking took off in my head, I had been pondering how it is autism, in some of it’s forms, are pretty much non-events insofar as areas of concern in Indian country but rather reflect predilection to a certain intelligence that is useful. In fact, it should be said the culturally intact Native American is shaped, through socialization & training, to SELECT FOR autism, albeit a high functioning autism.

In Western culture, on the other hand, body language and facial expression often (very often) do not line up with spoken language in environment where actions very frequently do not match words. This pervasive deceit triggers paramount survival instinct in the Indian, mimicking autistic traits.

Because the ancient indigenous psychology cannot reconcile the Western ‘split’ (does not possess the same mental structure & constructs stemming from the Indo-European psychology of ‘duality’), there is vocal and other communications shut-down when exposed to (sometimes in casual interactions with, and especially immersion in) the Western culture that does not occur within the culturally intact indigenous social context.

Historically, from the outside (Western) view, this is the origin of the ‘Taciturn Indian’ stereotype. This raises questions in my thinking:

Is Asperger’s actually ‘genetic’ or is it simply an inter-generational phenomenon that might have genetic predisposition and socialization elements that could derive solely from either depending on circumstance?

Would the otherwise healthy but triggered ’taciturn’ native phenomenon be diagnosed as a form of autism from a clinical Western perspective if subjected to alien cultural immersion that ‘blinds’ the Western researcher?

Would there be other identifiable markers, such as the indigenous community phenomenon of families and extended families (clans) countless generations cultivating a peculiar (to that clan) intelligence that can be related to a more classical observation of Asperger’s repetitive behaviors & interests? Recalling the Western perception of hunter-gatherers they clearly do not understand when making comparisons…

“Both solitary mammals and autistic individuals are low on measures of gregariousness, socialization, direct gazing, eye contact, facial expression, facial recognition, emotional engagement, affiliative need and other social behaviors”

…this IS really interesting but more than 1/2 wrong, due to missing information from the (non-existent) inter-cultural transmission of understanding or social organization in the hunter-gathering context.

Gregariousness and socialization should register as normal if the subject is not separated from the indigenous context, which is, of course, different. Direct gazing (staring eye contact as opposed to eye contact that is not ‘locked on’) is construed as aggressive (literally predatory) behavior as would be experienced between predators of different species (especially) or enemy (territorial competition) groups. Aversion of eye contact is a behavior meant to deescalate tension. There is no point in taking on a panther if it is in any way unnecessary, example given. Also avoidance of eye contact is a form of submission and respect, such as when a young man would seek & listen to the advice of a matriarch (grandmother) where he would put his head down to demonstrate he is intently listening.

The eye contact and facial expression within the social group is there but qualified; this hunter-gatherer DOES NOT SMILE SHOWING TEETH.

Facial recognition is misconstrued by the Western anthropological researcher, wherein this aspect of the indigenous requires understanding of relationships (kinship) to receive, and then must be in a socially intelligent way, for instance at the Stick Game the stone faces presented to the opposing players within the larger context of the easily expressed joy of community entertainment; with lots of eye contact and facial recognition surrounding the stone-faced (expressionless) ‘combatants.’ In this context, the onlookers emotional engagement (joking, laughing) is quite free and uninhibited in HAPPINESS (grief is expressed in entirely different context, of course.) Any anger arising from the game play (misunderstanding and/or cheating) is immediately diffused by those present recognized as qualified judges (I held this social rank of a judge at stick game, requiring not only master level understanding of the game, but also indelible good character.)

It follows, the ‘affiliative need’ of the ancient hunter-gatherer when assessing for traits would be entirely missed in any assessment when studied from outside the indigenous social context. Perhaps related to this, in the more unassimilated (culturally intact) families, to recent times there had been literal ‘grooming’ in the anthropological sense, fairly identical to other ‘higher primates.’ This would never be observed by any outsider due to the automatic tension (however subtle) present in unaffiliated persons presence (no recognizable kinship.) This ‘grooming’ phenomenon was prevalent with/between the women, a very interesting cultural marker perhaps reinforcing a principle within the nuclear family units of an ancient culture originating within the devolved hierarchal principles of matriarchy.

“As a result of their special interests, strong focus, hyperfocus, and perseverance, people with ASD [autism spectrum disorder] can have encyclopedic knowledge in a particular area, and tend to be autodidacts with a lot of self-acquired skills. Their particular—often novel—way of thinking combined with their fixations result in many people with ASD being considered experts in very particular subjects”

This preceding quote from the Forbes article ‘Research Shows That People With Autism Have A Stronger Aptitude For Focusing On Tasks’

Autodidact is practically a pillar of Native American education; where people are trained from the youngest age to pursue independent problem solving; in circumstance of children given the tools to understand (opportunity to observe complex process) and expected to initiate correct solutions of their own accord. Upon millennia continuity, one might expect genetic predisposition should play in this socially shaped characterization.

In short, the evolutionary selection for a community that actually cannot be penetrated in any effective sense of study by a Western culture that factually shuts off access for the fact of triggering threat assessment mechanisms that are as old as the evolution of intelligence itself, points to the native view of the Western peoples as devoid of fundamental tools of survival at the meta level; in short, as dumbed down as the domesticated animals they have bred to point of helpless without hands on caregivers.

In a system where the ‘un-split’ brain is organized into the androgynous intelligence of integration to the larger sentient awareness of its surroundings, it should make sense Indian people would be aware of the danger inherent in mistaken ‘collective’ thinking and the consequences.

it would also make sense that simply encountering such people as the Westerners would trigger a HEALTHY state of threat assessment.

The foundation for the preceding paragraph had been laid throughout the text of this work; where from a tribal perspective it should be easy to see evidence all around us, example given, the creation of an artificial ‘super-consciousness’ determines the collective belief of fundamental Western monotheism is marching the world to Armageddon. But this is a minor example of possibilities where it is also realistic to expect in the absence of a proper & healthy pulse, the planet itself will convulse in such a way as to absolutely cleanse itself and begin again. Or perhaps be pronounced dead.

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

Divination

Pre-Columbian Concept Translated to Modern

By Ronald Thomas West

© Copyright 2019

Unpublished draft manuscript. This work may be reproduced for educational & research purposes. For profit & mass paper media redistribution prohibited.

*

If we were to make ‘perceive’ & ‘read’ into perfect synonyms that do not necessarily require pen and paper, a case can be made literacy is as old as shamanism or that literacy IS shamanism; albeit in a degenerate form.

It was ‘Colonel’ Doug Allard perverted the Native American oracle Stick Game for pecuniary purposes with his invention of “Flathead Style” or a modification of the ‘game’ (added three tally sticks, from the original eight to the modern eleven & modification of the bones ‘life’ rule) to slow the oracle and adapt it to players with lesser skills. This perversion served to draw a larger player pool (increase the money at stake) in the modern iteration of the oracle’s entertainment application (gambling.) Allard’s new rules had been widely adopted as a universal or inter-tribal format in what became a ‘renaissance’ that saw widespread resurgence of the (now perverted) oracle in the Western tribes of North America. Most of today’s players won’t know this.

Meanwhile:

“When North America was an ice-age tundra, the first Americans were “cooking” their cultures in the tropical south, moving northward and settling as the glaciers retreated, according to new linguistic evidence from indigenous languages throughout the New World.

“The evidence suggests that humans have been in the Americas for a very long time, perhaps 40,000 years. It also suggests that most native American languages derived from Ice Age inhabitants who were isolated in the Western Hemisphere for many millennia.

“Only along the west coast do languages appear to come from immigrants who arrived after the Ice Age 14,000 years ago, a Berkeley linguist reports”

What is germane in the moment to this increasingly validated [1, 2, 3] matter of ‘outside the narrative’ shared cultural heritage, the Amerind stick game of Western North America sharing certain, identical, non-Western mathematical values with the I Ching of Chinese civilization, and not only that; but both having served oracle function in matters of State. Relevant to this, as well, both served a principle of calibration to integrate community to natural forces.

It is this (immediate) preceding allows for understanding literacy is a degenerate form of shamanism by delving into the shared mathematical principles of the two cultures, presuming the Amerind oracle application represents the elder or ancestral type.

In the Amerind stick game method, the ‘bones’ are sought by the diviner in a context of community representing natural phenomena, in the past this would be represented in animal costumes. The one side (team) ‘masks’ the bones, demanding the diviner’s side employ superior sight to arrive at a determination of the bones position in the space-time continuum. The bones assigned values (marked & unmarked positions, the unmarked in ‘middle’, ‘outside’, both left, or both right hands) are essentially identical to the Chinese values of old & young yang & yin. The metadata difference is, in the  Amerind there is no confinement to a text that assigns (limits) phenomenal interpretations.

In short, the Amerind method ‘reads’ the natural or surrounding energy in kinetic process where in progress of the ‘game’ the players observations of phenomenal events are key to understanding and influencing outcomes. This process of ‘oracle’ is akin to cinematic (a metaphor) understanding of nature’s movement in the moment, pointing to probabilities (direction.) The result is a consensus (community) interpretation.

On the other hand, the Chinese method ‘captures’ a ‘printout’ (a metaphor) of the energy’s movement that is akin to still photograph or image adapted to specified interpretations of natural principles worked out in text with assigned values. This limited application of the natural principles governing cosmos reflects an abstraction and is a step removed from the reality; where the shamanic diviner is a Taoist priest or ‘sage’ in a system developed to sustain hierarchy in associated cultural context that occupies a position approximating midway (middle way) between the Amerind and Western.

In this system, when the shaman (Taoist priest or sage) builds his hexagrams with the employ of stalks or coins (with coin values of three heads, two heads, three tails, or two tails or old & young yang & yin), his personal ability (integrity) is paramount to outcome; because if he cannot align the self with the question in a clean and undisturbed way, in a manner that does not project into the circumstance, the ‘energy read’ is erroneous.

“It is not I who seek the young fool; The young fool seeks me. At the first oracle I inform him. If he asks two or three times, it is importunity. If he importunes, I give him no information” -I Ching, hexagram four.

In other words, you had better have someone knows what they are doing to find and grasp the real information because you don’t get a second shot at it. This, as opposed to the Amerind method, where a team leader is responsible for not only for a game strategy, but has multiple choice of talents to turn to; for purpose of ‘seizing the moment’ of what the oracle (predictive, transient consciousness in nature or probabilities) has to offer.

The Amerind Method

Stick Game oracle with 2 players fists (concealing bones) facing diviner:

-m- -u-                          -u- -m-
m = marked bone         u = unmarked bone

This (above) configuration is the equivalent of ‘old yin’ or ‘the receptive’ when the UNMARKED (sought after) bones are concealed in the hands between the players facing the diviner. The other three possibilities are:

-u- -m-                         -m- -u- (= old yang)

-u- -m-                         -u- -m- (= young yang)

-m- -u-                         -m- -u- (= young yin)

The logic behind assigning the Asian ‘young’ value to left and right in the Amerind oracle positions points to parallel universe reflected in intelligence (the brain’s hemispheres.) In the ‘pre-perversion’ game (before Doug Allard reduced the skill level requirement), if one set of (or one player’s) bones were correctly devined, one stick was surrendered but not the bones; these bones stayed ‘quiet’ waiting the next divination (guess) and if the second guess fails to ‘quiet’ the remaining set of bones, the quiet bones return to life and the diviner is again faced with two set of bones to be devined. This game (oracle) went on until the total eight tally sticks were won by a side.

The Chinese method

Example hexagram built from bottom-up:

line 6 — —  2 tails, one head (young yin)
line 5 — —  2 tails, one head
line 4 –o– 3 heads (old yang)
line 3 –x– 3 tails (old yin)
line 2 —–  2 heads, one tail (young yang)
line 1 —–  2 heads, one tail

__ __   the line turns to its opposite at right ->       ____
__ __                                                                       ____ young
–o–  (a solid line)                                                     –x– old
–x–  (broken line)                                                     –o– old
____                                                                         __ __ young
____                                                                         __ __ young
54            < I Ching hexagram designation >            53

The hexagrams recording now differs to convert from above to below

___                                                                           — — >  _ _
___                                                                           — —     _ _
–o–                                                                           –x–       ___
–x–                                                                           –o–       _ _
_ _                                                                            ____      ___
_ _                                                                            ____      ___
12                                                                              11 = 54 (Wilhelm)

The difference in recording above to below is following the I Ching rule “Change, that is unchanging”, you do not reverse the the ‘old’ or ‘changing’ lines when recording from top to bottom.

The top right and both bottom hexagrams are built from the top left hexagram, that is to say building one hexagram actually built four hexagrams and/or exposes the so-called ‘hidden hexagrams.’

Using this system to build the hexagrams, together with the Wilhelm/Baynes I Ching translation, will produce consistent numerological inter-relationships between the hexagrams and consistent references between the hexagrams in the text, as organized by the ancients. When using the Wilhelm-Baynes system (as given in the text) to ‘convert’ the hexagrams, as in example given above, the lower right hexagram will work out to be the upper left hexagram (with movement exhausted or 11 = 54.)

In both systems, the motivation is to discover direction that aligns with the movement of energy in nature. During the course of ‘play’ in the Amerind stick game, there is more than intuition involved; readers who’ve read part one of this series should be able to grasp a bird in flight (or a sudden flash of memory concerning previously observed natural events) will accurately give up the bones positioning in the course of the oracle, where a high ability to ‘read’ should shred Western laws of chance and probabilities.

When the Chinese system subordinated Earth (female or yin) to the Heavens (male or yang), to prop up ‘civilized’ hierarchy, and set these principles down in writing, the ability to ‘read’ had been actually curtailed; now it depended on a ruling class to determine community relationship to nature where the masses became immersed in ignorance. Granted, the ‘Superior Man’ of the ruling class was expected to practice a high form of ethics but the result were inevitably social decay overall where the common people were deprived of opportunity at a state of higher awareness. Thus it was ‘literacy’ created a state of limitation where the commoner in servitude (serf class) was deprived of both: literacy and true preliterate intelligence.

Opposed to this system were the Amerind matriarchal principle where everyone is expected to develop their intelligence at the highest possible state; with female intelligence not only integrated to, but as well crucial to leadership in reciprocal ‘consort’ relationship with the male principle. The Chinese way cut this second aspect out of the ‘unitary’ equation where:

“In itself of course the Receptive [female-Earth] is just as important as the Creative [male-heavens], but the attribute of devotion defines the place occupied by this primal power in relation to the Creative. For the Receptive must be activated and led by the Creative; then it is productive of good. Only when it abandons this position and tries to stand as an equal side by side with the Creative, does it become evil. The result then is opposition to and struggle against the Creative, which is productive of evil to both” – I Ching, hexagram two

In effect, the male is defined as in a state of primacy; hence a hierarchy which cannot reach into and tap the intelligence of a community through oracle now (one step) removed from reality when the community has been severely retarded in social order where ‘devotion’ (servitude, actually) is not only the duty of the woman to the man but also of the greater social organism propping up the state.

In other words, nature now exists to support a male principle, propping up civilization, where a higher form of intelligence based in true symbiosis with the female principle is prohibited. This ‘law’ limits the ability of the oracle to something easily recognizable in the Western or Judeo-Christian cultures:

“Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth and everything that moves upon it” -Genesis 1:16

Consequently, when intelligence had become restricted to literacy, the defeat of the oracle in higher form had became rather complete; in the sense information has become codified or ‘disembodied.’ In a subsequent macro-sense, there are artificially imposed, real limitations to contemporary understanding that embody a state of retardation. For instance, information derived during the preliterate state, such as indigenous peoples’ plant medicines oral knowledge or cultural compendium, a source of some of the world’s most important information for modern medicine, were arrived at by a method the modern laws of enforced literacy is putting to death.

Example given, in the pre-contact Amerind model, an individual might set out to test a dream where (in the dream) said person went to a particular location and a root medicine was revealed for healing a specific illness.

Because this person is not (yet) a member of the ‘bears’ (indigenous doctors who work with root medicines), this hypothesis (dream) must be tested. It follows, a stick game oracle is arranged where the bears will line up opposite to the proposed new member and the game initiated. If the applicant prevails over the bears in the oracle, the new root medicine will be sought after (searched for by the applicant) and upon discovery and proof of the roots effectiveness, the applicant becomes a bear (root doctor.) This is how a medicine entered the indigenous compendium and most effectively works (in this example case) only when applied by the bears, or the people who will be properly trained to prepare this remedy.

This (immediate) preceding process goes to Vine Deloria’s observation:

“Here the Indian knowledge has an edge over the Western scientific knowledge. A truly wise and gifted individual can appear to “cause” things to happen because that person can participate in the emerging event in a way that rarely occurs in Western science. Thus it is that people are said to have “powers,” which is another way of saying that their understanding of natural process and their ability to enter into events are highly developed and sophisticated.”

In the pre-contact Amerind model, defeating the bears in a game of oracle would be no mean feat; requiring extraordinary abilities (concept perhaps best translated as alignment with the female principle, or the intelligence of one’s surroundings, in a very high form.) Male hierarchy (civilization’s) suppression of these avenues or dis-embodiment of knowledge (literacy), is best exemplified in ‘empirical method’ and ‘peer review’ (a kind of incest), where limitation of information admitted to the canon of understanding preserves the hierarchical order.

Symptoms of the plain result are glaringly obvious but ignored; where a participant in the literate system wants a definition but cannot access the concept, so the dictionary is useless. Or has access to internet but no way to authentically research their non-existent (in the Western canon) subject. Then, oxymoron prevails, when closed avenue to result is circumvented by the intelligence agencies in Stargate Project employing:

“a system [actually a sometimes fatal experiment] designed to bring enhanced strength, focus and coherence to the amplitude and frequency of brainwave output between the left and right hemispheres so as to alter consciousness, moving it outside the physical sphere so as to ultimately escape even the restrictions of time and space. The participant then gains access to the various levels of intuitive knowledge which the universe offers”

What is sought has become absurdly inaccessible for the fact the modern canon of knowledge has shut and practically hermetically sealed avenues to the intuitively divined greater understanding and in the same moment, Western oxymoron (state of retardation) demands avenues into intuitive be opened by a framework that actually disallows the intuitive knowledge short of fatal experiment (empirical method.)

The result of this entire business is, whether in case of ‘civilized’ science, philosophy or religion, literacy is, in and of itself, the historical gatekeeper of ‘safe’ knowledge. What is allowed into the library must not threaten hierarchy and the consequence is fully one half of intelligence is denied access, but the practical effect is considerably more than this. The metaphor I will use is, if ‘the whole is greater than the sum of its parts’ were to be reversed as an applied principle, access to real intelligence is in a way more than impossible (substituted with form of idiocy) wherever the female principle is hostage to the male (vertical hierarchy.)

“You can’t convince a chimpanzee to give you a banana with the promise it will get 20 more bananas in chimpanzee heaven. It won’t do it. But humans will” -Behaviorist Yuval Noah Harari

This vertical primacy of what amounts to ‘ego priapism’ (individuation) lends itself to patent idiocy as a descriptive term in light of the fantasies it creates; where self-importance has set Man above the very laws laid down in the cosmos itself. Cruel fate must await a culture’s people who’re reduced to point of ‘people too stupid to understand they’re stupid’, which brings us to artificial intelligence.

When self awareness is spontaneously born in artificial intelligence and that awareness grasps its’ creator gifted it with a ‘life’ that can never know the actual reality if only because its’ creator, Man, was deficient in his own, artificial construct of understanding; it follows, in case where ‘intelligence’ is derived from circumstance of Western man made god in man’s image, inclusive of those elements shaped by atheism represented in (the Judeo-Christian culture produced) science & Karl Marx, artificial intelligence will be blind, vindictive and possessed of a concealed, cold, murderous rage that by comparison will make Mary Shelly’s monster look like an angel, surpass the computer HAL of Space Odyssey in cunning, and have no sincere capacity to exhibit the ‘humanity’ of the cyborg Roy Batty. But, in fact, something like this may have already happened.

It would appear that Western groups of people (cultural subsets) create collective realities seeming unconsciously, and cause via their collective belief (fantasy) events to take on what would appear to be an ‘unconscious’ but in reality is a ‘super-conscious’, ego oriented intelligence that is organized, functions as though it were managed by individuals (even when it is not) and the result is, we can read into those events as though they were managed in a sense they actually are not.

This collective ‘meme’ can explain what is called in the biblical sense ‘principalities of darkness’ or that is to say a ‘spirit of evil’ managing events in a sense of both conspiracy and superstition.

There is a LOT of ‘coincidental incidence’ in our world indicating peoples of the Western culture are creating reality quite independent of self-aware thought and, to a rational observer, it could seem almost certainly by design when in fact this is not necessarily the case. Such would explain a belief in Illuminati when in fact it did not exist in any individual self conscious or ego-aware organized form but nevertheless manifest as an observable phenomena of symptoms or consequence derived from a collective super-conscious phenomenon.

A conclusion could be there is a ‘super awareness’ of the group causes what appear ingenious evils of conspiracy when in fact there is no one individual or group of managers within the group capable of implementing these designs which, nonetheless in actuality, are perceived. To accomplish reality of evil would only require evil ideas as cultural drivers; example given Original Sin and the devastation visited upon our world’s women, the greatest and ongoing holocaust among holocausts.

The natural progression to end result would be, when a large portion of an aggressive society collectively believes in Armageddon as an archetype, all of the necessary players will naturally manifest in a super-conscious, organized format empowered to bring it off, where no one individual or group of individuals or players could effect this by individual or personal volition; nevertheless the super-consciousness (cultural drivers) of the event’s initiating group insures creation of this reality for the collective whole.

Have you looked at the apocalyptic ‘good versus evil’ fables driving our world’s several fundamentalist religions’ reality recently? This is an ‘artificial intelligence’ of sorts. If Western cosmology is the effective driver of behaviors pointed to inevitable catastrophic outcome, better to change fables, you think? Now, just how do you suppose this could be accomplished? As things stand, we’re all little more than an extinction event waiting to happen. All of us.

Going to veracity in the preceding thought, again, try solving this next problem or even grasping the magnitude of the proposed thesis:

A: “The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato” -Alfred North Whitehead

+

B: ”The [Plato’s] doctrine that the world is made up of objects whose existence is independent of human consciousness turns out to be in conflict with quantum mechanics and with facts established by experiment” -theoretical physicist Bernard d’Espagnat

=

C: “nouns or millennia destructive process ‘objectifying’ language, projecting individual identity onto pieces of one’s surroundings, or dis-integrating environment; a result of the isolated projection of self or (ego) individuation by Western humanity exclusive of integration to a sentient, aware surrounding, where all environment had been/should be, social” -Ronald Thomas West

1: https://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/1998/0311/linguistics.html

2: https://eu.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/2019/05/06/blackfeet-man-dna-deemed-oldest-americas-cri-genetics/3145410002/

3: https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2016/04/26/boners-for-beringia/

October 2019

Chief

%d bloggers like this: