Archives for category: assassinations

Read in English

Priča o tome kako se odbrana svete zemlje američkih starosedelaca promenila, za više od dvadeset godina, u igru međunarodnih intriga i preživljavanja atentata; sa zaključcima

Hronologija događaja u slučaju Ronalda Tomasa Vesta (skraćeni rezime)

1

Flojd Heviraner, tradicionalni ratni poglavica Blekfit Indijanaca u Montani, me je 1987. godine zamolio da nadgledam interes Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (Šumska služba) za traženje nafte i prirodnog gasa na zemljištu plemena Blekfit, zaštićenim sporazumom, poznatom kao „Badger-Two-Medicine“, takođe poznat kao „Ustupljeni pojas“, koji podleže plemenskim pravima po takozvanom „Grinel sporazumu“ koji je takođe poznat kao „Ugovor iz 1895“.

Flojd je 1988. godine, angažovao Marka Milera iz Ostina, u Teksasu (koji je imao licencu u Montani) kao pravnog zastupnika za Blekfitovo „Društvo hrabrih pasa“, takođe poznato kao i „Ludi psi“, u Flojdovom svojstvu tradicionalnog kulturnog vođe te drevne plemenske organizacije.

Do 1991. godine, kao glavni istražitelj u ime Društva hrabrih pasa, u udruženju sa Markom Milerom, prikupio sam obimne dokumentarne dokaze protiv kriminalnog prstena, koji je radio unutar Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, u ime korporacije ŠEVRON, a koji su sadržali detalje orkestriranog nastojanja da lažiraju usklađenost sa zakonima, koji bi inače trebalo da štite to područje u ime Društva hrabrih pasa, koji obuhvata službenike Sjedinjenih Američkih Država koji su vršili nezakonite radnje, uključujući krivična dela:

Laganje Hrabrim psima i veću Laganje javnosti

Laganje Kongresa o sledećim posebnim primenjivim zakonima (Zakon o nacionalnom istorijskom očuvanju „tradicionalne kulturne baštine“)

Prikrivanje od Hrabrih pasa, veća i javnosti da je Šumska služba upoznata sa tim primenjivim zakonima

Prikrivanje obuke službenika Šumske službe za te iste primenjive zakone Namerno kršenje tih istih zakona, u korist ŠEVRONA

Ova inkriminišuća dokumenta, uzeta zajedno, ukazuju na isprepletenu i organizovanu kriminalnu mrežu, oličenu u vladinim službenicima koji rade u korist ŠEVRONA, u svrhu namernog lažiranja usklađenosti sa zakonom, koji ide do najviših nivoa Sjedinjenih Američkih Država u Vašingtonu DC. Ovaj poseban kriminalni događaj je organizovan i njime se upravljalo iz sedišta Severnog regiona jedan Šumske službe Sjedinjenih Američkih Država u Misuli, u Montani, a implementiran je preko kancelarija Luis i Klark, Nacionalne šume u Grejt Folz, u Montani.

Ova dokumenta su inkorporirana u administrativnu žalbu kada su ŠEVRON-ove (i FINA-ine) dozvole za bušenje bile odobrene po automatizmu u sedištu Severnog regiona jedan u Misuli. Ova žalba je momentalno zaustavila projekat. Neprilika u prikrivanju kriminalne mreže postignuta je birokratskim nalogom, kada je FBI odbio da se uključi (lično sam informisao agenta koji je pregledao dokumentaciju i priznao njihov sadržaj, ali je tvrdio da nema ovlašćenje da reaguje i uputio me na kancelariju tužioca Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (Ministarstva pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država) u Bilingsu, u Montani, za koga je izjavio da je veoma dobro upoznat sa problemima). Nakon što je Generalni inspektor Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država odbio da ovo istraži, kancelarija Generalnog inspektora Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država je izjavila da oni neće da se uključe pod izgovorom da je to pitanje već potegnuto u procesu administrativne žalbe. Pošto se vlada (i Ševron) nisu usudili da dozvole da dokumenta uđu u evidenciju federalnog suda, gde bi bili stavljeni pred sudiju (ili sudije po žalbi u sudskoj parnici), senator Sjedinjenih Američkih Država Maks Baukus je napravio politički dil sa Ševronom koji je sadržao zamenu najma i Ševron se povukao. Kada sam ja lično uspeo da stavim inkriminišuća dokumenta u ruke (odnedavno novog) šefa Šumske službe Flojda Tomasa, on je pokušao da zatvori sedište Severnog regiona jedan

i da premesti operacije u Denver gde „bi bile pod pomnim nadzorom“. Bili su potrebni napori dva senatora Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, Maksa Baukusa i Konrada Bernsa da se ovo preokrene.

Beleška 1) REDIGOVANO

Beleška 2) Dva advokata koji su informisali vladinu stranu (Šumsku službu) o domorodačkim pravnim problemima tokom ovog perioda, Džon Ju i Džej Bajbi, kasnije će postati ozloglašeni kao Bušovi „advokati za mučenje“ povezani sa Kondolizom Rajs. Kondoliza Rajs je (pre i posle Bušovog režima) imala bliske veze sa ŠEVRONOM.

Beleška 3) Sedište „Severnog regiona jedan“ u Montani ima dugu vezu sa CIA-om, koja datira od 1950-ih i još uvek aktivan odnos u 1970-ima i verovatno tokom 1980-tih i kasnije, u vezi sa avio uslugama, viškom imovine i pranja novca kroz vazduhoplove korišćene u agencijskom prevozu oružja i otpadničkih elemenata (crni budžet) međunarodne trgovine narkoticima.

Beleška 4) Tokom mog istraživačkog rada, kojim je otkriven kriminalni prsten unutar vlade koji radi za ŠEVRON, Asocijacija veterana je iznenada i lažno dijagnostifikovala da bolujem od „psihoze“. Uspeo sam da poništim ovo tako što sam nezavisno otišao na evaluaciju u isti medicinski centar koji je Asocijacija veterana koristila za proučavanje šizofrenije, i ispalo je da sam čist.

Beleška 5) Nakon ovoga, moju evidenciju u Asocijaciji veterana je pregledao „specijalista“ iz Vašingtona DC i određena dokumenta su nestala, tako da izgleda kao da sam ja prevario Asocijaciju veterana. Na zakazanom saslušanju, gde sam pokazao kopiju kritičnog dokumenta koji nedostaje i koji je bio neophodan za moju odbranu, saslušanje je otkazano na licu mesta, a optužbe odbačene.

Beleška 6) 1998. godine sam dao ostavku na poslu u Milerovoj advokatskoj kancelariji zbog zdravstvenih problema.

2

2001. godine, iz Vest Glasiera, u Montani preselio sam se u Sandija Park, u Novi Meksiko. Nakon toga, krajem leta 2005. godine, upisao sam najmlađeg sina u Ist Mauntin srednju školu (čarter škola), instituciju za ubrzano učenje. Škola je slučajno imala značajne veze sa moćnim ličnostima u korporativnom vojno-industrijskom kompleksu u Albukerkiju.

Do kasne jeseni, intenzivan pritisak je započeo u obliku prekomernog maltretiranja, činilo se da je namera da budemo naterani da napustimo školu.

Započeo sam sopstvenu istragu i otkrio suštinske razloge. Tokom ovog procesa, ono što sam sam otkrio bilo je sledeće:

Krivična dela vezana za obrazac ponašanja škole i opsežna kršenja građanskih prava posebno učenika manjina, i drugih učenika, od strane neprikladnog uticaja ličnosti ultra desnog krila, rasističkog, „Hrišćanskog Dominiona“.

Ono što spolja izgleda je da je to američka čarter škola (EMHS) sa ubačenim obaveštajnim agentima koji su zaposleni kao nastavnici.

Moguće korišćenje „putovanja u inostranstvo“ sponzirisanih od strane škole kao pokriće za tajne operacije u Latinskoj Americi i Evropi.

U međuvremenu, izazvao sam paralelnu istragu (od kraja 2006. do proleća 2007. godine) o nezakonitim aktivnostima škole, od strane člana školskog upravnog veća, Džima Hilija, u pogledu maltretiranja mog sina i mene. Tokom ove druge (paralelne) istrage od strane člana školskog upravnog veća Džima Hilija, prišao mi je drugi član školskog upravnog veća, David Volter, koji me je obavestio da stajem na žulj članovima „Veća za odnose sa inostranstvom“ i upozorio me (pretnja) „Da se nisi usudio da umešaš advoкate“. Volter je dalje izjavio da bilo kakva akcija da se škola bude odgovorna „Nema šanse“ ni pod kakvim okolnostima. Za manje od godinu dana, jedan nastavnik iz škole (ubačeni obaveštajac, skoro sigurno CIA), Vins Langan, bio je deo tima koji je pokušao da mi postavi zasedu u Berlinu.

Sa nerešenim slučajem Ist Mauntin srednje škole, sveže razveden, prodatom kućom i najmlađim detetom na koledžu, otišao sam iz Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, u julu 2007. godine, da prisustvujem konferenciji na univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg u Majncu, u Nemačkoj.

Nisam imao nameru da se vratim u Sjedinjene Američke Države u kratkom roku, shvatajući da sam stvorio moćne korumpirane neprijatelje, a bez adekvatnih resursa koji su neophodni da se izvrši zatvaranje slučaja čarter škole. Ipak, u međuvremenu sam pokazao osobama koje su povezane sa školskom administracijom da nisam imao nameru da ostavim taj slučaj. To je proizvelo sledeći rezultat:

3. oktobra 2007. godine, rutinski sam tražio bankomat (ATM) koji sam obično koristio kod Johan Taler Čosi šoping centra u berlinskom predgrađu Bric. Tokom moje procene (profesionalna bezbednosna obuka) da li ima nekih pretnji, uspeo sam da pokrenem tim koji je čekao u zasedi kod lokacije bankomata. Pošto sam ih uočio pre nego što su shvatili da su otkriveni, uspeo sam da vizuelno identifikujem Vinsa Langana iz Ist Mauntin srednje škole, jednog od ubica, u okolnostima u kojima su mi i omogućili da pobegnem i da učinim da Langan shvati da je identifikovan. Dve nedelje kasnije, imao sam drugi bliski susret sa pokušajem ubistva od strane nepoznate osobe u metrou broj 7.

Smesta sam (sledećeg jutra) otišao iz Berlina u Lindau (Bodenze).

Beleška 7) Moje praćenje do lokacije bankomata u inostranstvu zahtevalo je pristup mojim bankovnim informacijama koje mogu da se dobiju preko takozvanog „Pisma o nacionalnoj sigurnosti“. Ovo ukazuje na umešanost korumpiranog FBI-a.

3

Otišavši iz Berlina u Lindau sredinom oktobra, ubrzo sam organizovao preko treće strane (REDIGOVANO) pozivnicu za nemačke vlasti da nadgledaju moju situaciju („pratite me i gledajte“). Ovo je bio namerni trik da uhvatim u zamku ono u šta sam verovao (u to vreme) da je bio pokušaj ubistva uzbunjivača (mene), u vezi sa krivičnim delima koja su počinile bogate, korumpirane ličnosti povezane sa Ist Mauntin srednjom školom.

Dve nedelje kasnije, jednog ranog nedeljnog jutra 4. novembra 2007. godine, dok sam šetao, kada je napolju bilo malo ljudi, prigušeni metak ispaljen iz puške sa velike udaljenosti za malo me je promašio i napravio rupu u parkiranom automobilu pored koga sam prolazio.

Posle toga, u utorak 4. decembra 2007. godine, shvatio sam da sam privukao nemački nadzor koji sam tražio, kada sam putovao da održim prezentaciju u grupi studenata (REDIGOVANO), nemačka policija je pročešljala voz kojim sam putovao, tražila jednog putnika u mom vagonu i tražila lične karte od svih i ispitivala sve osim mene.

Beleška 8) Projektil velike brzine je pogodio parkirani automobil, pored kog sam prolazio, takvom silinom, bilo je jasno zbog zvuka, da je probio metal karoserije, odbio se o potporni zid ispred koga je automobil bio, zarotirao se i zaustavio ispod automobila. Vratio sam se na tu lokaciju posle nekoliko dana, procenio mogućnosti i postalo je jasno da je pucanj ispaljen sa velike udaljenosti, sa prirodnog uzvišenja (strane brda) sa dobrim zaklonom sa udaljenosti od možda 500 metara.

4

Preselio sam se u Limburg u rano proleće 2008. godine, a zatim u Visbaden (u junu), prihvatajući poziv univerziteta u Majncu, da predajem tečaj (na engleskom) o američkom ustavnom pravu (letnji semestar). Ovo leto 2008. godine bila je intenzivna igra mačke i miša za mene, vezano za moje ubice/lovce. Od nekoliko susreta u Visbadenu, najupečatljiviji događaji su:

Moj motorola (Razer) mobilni telefon sa karticom američkog T-mobile iznenada je prestao da se ponaša normalno, nije više pokaziovao „t- mobile D“ (nemački) logo prijem, nije više tražio međunarodni kod da pristupim svojoj govornoj pošti u SAD-u, u stvari ekran je pokazivao (a telefon se ponašao) kao da sam zaista bio u SAD-u. Nekako je imao konekciju oko ili kroz nemačku prijemnu mrežu i izgleda da ga je koristila američka obaveštajna agencija (NSA) da preko GPS nađe moju lokaciju u realnom vremenu. Prebacio sam moj telefon na nemačku t-mobile pripejd karticu.

Otprilike u vreme kada sam primetio da se dogodila ova promena na telefonu, jedna staklena kuglica je ispaljena na mene dok sam šetao trotoarom punim ljudi na Severnoj strani (moje područje stanovanja) u Visbadenu. Čuo sam nešto što je izgledalo kao da je neki snažni mehanizam sa oprugom otpušten iza mene, i okrenuo sam se da pogledam i video jednog čoveka kako me oštro posmatra dok je izlazio iz gužve (braon stetson šešir od čvrstog filca, nosio je akten tašnu), stao na

ulicu, prešao ulicu i pobegao. Nastavio je da gleda u mene kao da je očekivao da će se nešto desiti. Kada sam se vratio u stan, seo sam za radni sto i skinuo pletenu kapu, jedna veoma mala staklena kuglica, izgledalo je kao da je napunjena mutnom tečnošću, ispala je iz moje kape na tastaturu računara. Ova kuglica se zaustavila nedirnuta u mojoj kapi, tamo gde je kapa bila podvijena na potiljku. Pažljivo sam stavio (bez dodirivanja) tu staklenu kuglicu u malu bočicu od leka sa mojim imenom na njoj, i spakovao je u papirnu maramicu kao meru predostrožnosti da se pošalje po (REDIGOVANO) na analizu.

Nakon ovog prethodnog incidenta, primetio sam da je izgledalo kao da sam praćen sa svrhom da se ustanove moje rutinske navike (GPS komponenta je izgleda bila izgubljena zbog moje telefonske konverzije).

Jedna osoba se urezala u moje pamćenje, iako nisam znao ko je ona u leto 2008. godine, bila je tada aktivni CIA službenik, Sabrina De Sousa. Istakla se zbog toga što mi se nasmešila kada je prolazila ulicom. Bila je delimično obučena u ležernu odeću južne Azije i nasmešila mi se znalački i izrazom koji može da se smatra osobitim samo kada sretnete potpunog neznanca. To je obeležilo De Sousu u mom pamćenju.

Od nekoliko pokušaja tokom ovog perioda, jedan pokušaj je jasno ličio na tehniku korišćenu u „Imam rapito affair“ (skandal otetog imama), poznatu i kao slučaj Abu Omar, u koji je De Sousa bila uključena. Vraćao sam se sa svog predavanja u Majncu kada sam primetio (zahvaljujući svojoj obuci) odstupanje od nečega što bi inače izgledalo kao jedan normalan i nebitan događaj. Grupa muškaraca, obučena u tipično plavo nemačko radno odelo za muškarce, bila je na pauzi.

Ta okolnost mi je upala u oči dok sam prilazio, iz sledećih razloga: nije bilo razgovora uopšte, izgledali su „namešteno“ (ukočeno, kao da im je gluma nepoznata radnja), imali su američki govor tela i ono što bih nazvao fizički izgled „Delta jedinica“ (građu tela koju biste tipično sreli kod hiper fizički istreniranih vojnika za specijalne operacije). Izuzev odeće, uopšte nisu izgledali kao nemački radnici. Moja ruta trotoarom bi me odvela između onoga što je bio zbijeni polukrug trojice ovih „radnika“ i polukruga zatvorenog prema ulici belim kombijem bez prozora, sa otvorenim kliznim bočnim vratima sa najmanje jednim putnikom.

Postojao je četvrti „radnik“ na mestu suvozača (sa otvorenim vratima) jednog automobila parkiranog odmah iza kombija, koji je krio registarske tablice kombija sa zadnje strane. Izgledalo je da je on postavljen na „zadnju poziciju“, u slučaju ako bih ja izbegao ili nekako prošao kroz prvu trojicu, bio je postavljen da me ugura u kombi. Jasno, očekivalo se da ću proći između polukruga i kombija. Prišao sam nezainteresovano, da bih prišao što je bliže moguće zbog vizuelne procene, i u poslednjem momentu umesto da nastavim trotoarom u ono što je sigurno bila zamka kako bi me „zgrabili“ i „oteli“ (mogli su da me ubace u kombi i nadvladaju za nekoliko sekundi, manje od pet, sigurno), skrenuo sam na ulicu, u saobraćaj (imao sam sreće da me neka kola nisu pregazila). Izbegavanje je bilo jednostavno.

Poslednji pokušaj u Visbadenu je bio kada je stan, koji sam iznajmljivao, trebalo da bude oglašen za nove podstanare. Momentalno se zainteresovao jedan par, koji je tamo živeo u vojnoj bazi Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Ovaj nemački par nije mogao da iščeka da preuzme stan od mene, bili su nervozni da se usele što je pre moguće. On je bio iz bivšeg DDR-a, bio je veliki obožavalac Džordža Buša i radio je za američku vojsku u nekom tajnom svojstvu (neuhvatljivo), a ona je vodila cvećaru u bazi.

Ubrzo me je nazvala i izjavila da bi volela da donese neke pakete da ostavi u stanu, veče pre nego što se ja iselim (u petak), što je dodatno upalilo crvenu lampicu. Jednostavno sam rekao da me nazove u utorak pre toga i da onda pita, pošto još nisam mogao da znam da li ću biti kod kuće to veče kada je ona želela da dođe sa paketima. Znao sam (ali nisam rekao) da je vlasnik stana želeo da nešto renovira. Otišao sam nedelju dana pre mog roka za izlazak, i kada je ona nazvala, stan je u potpunosti prečešljao vlasnik, a ja sam već sedam dana bio izvan Visbadena. Kada je pitala da li paketi mogu da se donesu u četvrtak, odgovorio sam „Ja sam u Berlinu, moraćete da pitate vlasnika“. Njena reakcija je bila uzvik „On je u Berlinu!“ svom mužu (saučesniku u zaveri) i onda je njen muž počeo sa tiradom na nemačkom… sa nemačkim vlastima koje imaju otvorenu pozivnicu da nadziru sve moje telefonske pozive, ja očekujem da su otkrili dvoje Nemaca koji rade za američku obaveštajnu službu.

Beleška 9) Bez ulaženja u detalje, postavio sam test tokom ovog perioda, posle gašenja GPS na mom telefonu, poveravajući se bliskoj osobi od poverenja preko Skajpa, tehnikom za koju sam očekivao da bi mogla da funkcioniše da me uhvate i uspeju da ubiju. Ovo je bila sledeća tehnika koju su pokušali, ali bio sam spreman za nju, video sam kako se okolnosti razvijaju i osujetio sam im pokušaj.

Beleška 10) Pomenuću ovde, imao sam skoro jednu celu godinu obuke (1974.-1975.) u vojnoj obaveštajnoj službi za specijalne operacije (19-a grupa specijalnih snaga) sa nekima od najiskusnijih u toj eri i, štaviše, visoko sam obučen kao asimetrični kontraobaveštajac, po pitanju tehnike o kojoj nemam pravo da diskutujem. Koliko god bila posredna, referenca može da se napravi za ovu drugu instancu, sa referencom za čitaoca na ovu studiju: „Nekonvencionalna podrška ljudskoj inteligenciji“, od komandanta L.R. Bremseta, mornarica Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, 28. april 2001., Ratni koledž korpusa marinaca.

Beleška 11) REDIGOVANO

Beleška 12) Izgubio sam određene beleške o hronologiji iz ovog perioda i nakon njega, zbog kasnijeg kvara na mom laptopu i posledičnog gubitka podataka. Posle gubitka podataka, izgubio sam naviku da vodim beleške o mnogim mojim doživljajima, ali mogu da rekonstruišem hronologiju nekih važnih događaja sa drugim zapisima.

Beleška 13) Do kraja 2008. godine, shvatio sam da ovo nije izolovan pokušaj ubistva da se zataška korupcija u školi, već je bilo nešto daleko veće. Moja odluka je bila da ovo isteram što više mogu, u nadi da bi, naročito to što me sada nadzire nemačka policija, to dovelo ka obelodanjivanju šire slike prikrivenog napora u pokušaju mog ubistva. U tom momentu, nisam zapravo očekivao da ću preživeti, već sam bio odlučan da napravim što je moguće više štete kriminalnom elementu preko tajnog aranžmana mog nadzora.

5

Nakon nekoliko nedelja boravka u Berlinu, u decembru 2008. godine, preselio sam se u Kataloniju, u Španiju, i iznajmio stan u gradu San Feliu de Gišol (San Feliu de Guixols).

Moj boravak u Španiji je bio napet, ali ograničiću moje beleške na nekoliko neobičnih događaja.

Španska domaća obaveštajna služba je direktno komunicirala sa mnom, da bi mi stavila do znanja da me prati. Na koji način su to iskomunicirali (uključujući direktno „hvala vam“, između ostalih događaja, u nekoliko prilika) možda najbolje opisuje ovaj rani primer: Imao sam susret vredan pažnje sa jednom ženom u piljarnici pored svog stana. Bilo je to kao scena iz filma Vudija Alena. Samo nekoliko dana kasnije, odigrala se ova ista scena sa mnom i drugom ženom koja mi je prišla u drugoj prodavnici. Očigledno, ona je prostudirala video snimak ranijeg susreta i ovaj drugi susret je blisko imitirao prvi susret, da mi stave do znanja da me nadziru.

Bilo je to dok sam bio u Španiji 2009. godine, CIA-in službenik Sabrina De Sousa je tužila Sjedinjene Američke Države za diplomatski imunitet za njenu ulogu u slučaju „Imam rapito affair“ ili „Abu Omar case“, što je pojavilo kao vest sa njenom fotografijom u onlajn medijima (Nju Jork tajms) i ja sam odmah prepoznao De Sousu kao onu nasmešenu ženu koju sam sreo u Visbadenu prethodnog leta. Dok sam nadgledao AP Wire (RSS prenos), takođe sam zapazio izjavu pripisanu optuženom italijanskom generalu Nikolu Polariju, nešto kao „da je Kondoliza Rajs lično nadgledala tim za otmice u ovom slučaju“. On je želeo da pozove Rajs na sud u svoju odbranu.

Tada je šira slika mojih sopstvenih okolnosti prvi put počela da dobija pravi smisao. Ako je Kondoliza Rajs „lično nadgledala“ tim za izručenja koji je uključivao Sabrinu De Sousa, ovo je pokazivalo da moj slučaj nije bio samo o Ist Mauntin srednjoj školi, već je od ranije imao veze sa slučajem Badger-Two-Medicine Društva hrabrih pasa Blekfita, ŠEVRONOM i administracijom Buša starijeg. Put karijere Rajsove vodio je od ŠEVRONOVOG borda direktora, preko Savetnika za nacionalnu bezbednost kod Buša mlađeg, pa do Državnog sekretara (Stejt Department Sjedinjenih Američkih Država je sijamski blizanac sa CIA- om) i nazad do ŠEVRONA, u eri posle Buša. Kao slučajnost sa ovim, dva advokata koji su pripremali pravne beleške o pravima Indijanaca koje je Šumska služba citirala u slučaju Badger-Two-Medicine, Džon Ju i Džej Bajbi, su od tada postali ozloglašeni kao Bušovi „advokati za mučenje“ u vezi sa izručenjima.

U junu 2009. godine, u vezi sa ovim novim razvojem događaja, otišao sam na kratko putovanje u Berlin da obezbedim u ugašenoj NVO „Asocijaciji za podršku Severnoameričkim Indijancima“ dosije o Blekfit hrabrim psima, za koji sam znao da će sadržati inkriminišuću, povezanu dokumentaciju. Lično sam prošao kroz dosije da se uverim da postoji kompletan zapis dokumentacije o ŠEVRONOVOM kriminalnom prstenu koji sam ranije sreo u administraciji Buša starijeg (sve je bilo tu) i organizovao da ceo dosije bude prosleđen (REDIGOVANO), što je i urađeno.

Nepoznatog datuma (zbog gubitka podataka) drugi metak iz prigušivača me je zamalo promašio, ispaljen iz visoke zgrade u S’garu, dok sam pešačio iz predgrađa S’gara, preko uzvišenja u San Feliu de Gišol. Ovaj događaj se desio dok sam prolazio pored gradilišta, gde se o jedan kameni nasip odbio projektil visoke brzine. Pešak ispred mene je naglo okrenuo glavu u smeru gde je metak pogodio kamen, to nije moglo da se ignoriše.

24. oktobra 2009. godine, izbegao sam da me ciljano pregaze nova, crvena, iznajmljena kola sa dva tamnoputa muškarca, čije su ruke bile prekrivene tetovažama bandi.

20. februara 2010. godine, iznenadio sam bišeg CIA-nog „Kauboja“ Garija Berntsena (sada privatni ugovarač) na recepciji hotela Barcarola u S’garo, bilo je između 7 i 8 ujutro, dok je prijavljivao svoj tim ubica u hotel. Zajedno smo uhvaćeni na sigurnosnoj kameri.

Gari je prvo imao bled zapanjen izgled koji je prešao u izraz lica kao da je uhvaćen sa rukom u kutiji sa kolačićima, i kao da bi želeo da propadne u zemlju, dok sam ja stajao nekoliko centimetara od njega, doslovno dodirujući se laktovima, a njegovi telohranitelji su samo stajali tamo zureći u mene sa zapanjenim glupim izrazom lica u okolnostima kada im je potpuno uništen paravan, nisam mogao a da im se ne nasmejem na odlasku prema vratima. Dao sam im oko šest sati prednosti pre nego što sam postavio tu činjenicu o susretu tog jutra na internet, gde je španska domaća obaveštajna služba gledala moja ažuriranja o susretima. Berntsen i saradnici su bili pametni da pobegnu.

5. jula 2010. godine, imao sam posetu, oko pola sata, kada su dva veoma ljubazna policajca [Mossos] došla na moja vrata. Ono što su

policajci rekli je bilo interesantno. Policija je upisala moje podatke iz pasoša, pitala me o detaljima da potvrde moj identitet, preko radija su izvestili o mom imenu, mojim podacima i dali mi da potpišem izjavu sa zaključkom da živim u tadašnjem stanu „manje-više jednu godinu, da se preda sudiji“ koji je želeo da potvrdi identitet osobe koja živi u mom stanu. Nisam krio činjenicu da sam neprijavljen u Španiji i pojasnio sam da nemam nameru da se prijavim u imigracionom ili da zatražim prebivalište. Policija me je uverila da moj boravak u Španiji nije problem i da ih nije zanimalo ništa drugo osim da potvrde moj identitet za sudiju.

Negde u ovo vreme sam bio poprilično siguran da sam bio otrovan. Jednog dana sam, nakon što sam jeo napolju, iznenada osetio obilno znojenje bez groznice i kasnije, moje zdravlje je krenulo nizbrdo. To i činjenica da je sudija Baltazar Garzon nedavno bio sklonjen sa svoje sudijske stolice u Španiji pod ogromnim pritiskom od strane SAD-a u korumpiranom i političkom procesu (pomno sam pratio slučaj sudije Garzona), zajedno sa Narodnom strankom koja je preuzela vlast, osetio sam da je moj boravak u Španiji neodrživ. Vratio sam se u Berlin u avgustu.

Beleška 14) Letnji period 2009. godine je nestao iz svih mojih onlajn imejl evidencija, počevši ubrzo nakon što sam objavio ovo pismo od 18. februara 2009. godine onlajn, postavljeno 3. juna 2009. godine. Veći deo juna, ceo jul i avgust su nestali i još mnogo toga, do početka 2010. godine, 4 naloga, 3 na google-u i 1 na yahoo-u. Ovo se poklopilo sa mojim prethodnim praćenjem, preko moje debitne kartice Wells Fargo Debit Card (korišćenje bankomata) i od strane T-Mobile USA mobilnog telefona korišćenjem GPS… sve ukazuje na pristupanje mojim različitim računima, uključujući telefon, bankovne račune i imejl naloge, preko Pisma o nacionalnoj bezbednosti i saučesništva organa za sprovođenje zakona da me prate radi pokušaja mog ubistva u egzilu. Pismo koje sam objavio 3. juna:

18. februar 2009. godine Od: Ronald Vest
Za: Federalni istražni biro Pozdrav FBI

Molim vas da kopija ovog mejla bude stavljena u moj dosije i da istinita i potpuna kopija bude prosleđena Glenu Fajnu u kancelariju Generalnog inspektora u Ministarstvu pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Na osnovu mojih iskustava protekle tri i po godine manje-više, zahtevam sledeće:

Istragu i sveobuhvatni pregled bilo kojih povezanih istraga koje su dozvolile bilo kojoj agenciji Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, uključujući i vašu, pristup (preko Pisma o nacionalnoj bezbednosti ili BILO KOJIH sredstava, npr. Izvršnim nalogom ili pravnim memorandumom koji zaobilazi „FISА“ sud, itd.) mojim ličnim podacima (posebno o mom kretanju preko zapisa bankomata i (GPS) mobilnog telefona, imejla i razgovora na „skajpu“) koje su mogle da dovedu do nekoliko iskustava uključujući, ali ne ograničavajući se na:

U Berlinu, u Nemačkoj, u Johanes Taler Čosi tržnom centru (područje Britz Sud) u veoma bliskoj i napetoj situaciji vrebao me je Vins Langan (ili njegov brat blizanac) iz Ist Mauntin srednje škole (Sandia Park, NM) zajedno sa saučesnikom, 3. oktobra 2007. godine. Kako to može da bude u vezi sa, nekoliko nedelja kasnije, metkom iz prigušivača koji me je zamalo promašio i napravio rupu u vozilu pored kojeg sam prolazio u Lindau, u Nemačkoj.

Pod kojim okolnostima su dalji lov i ono što izgleda da je pokušaj ubistva u vezi sa mojim t-mobile telefonom, konektovanim direktno kroz t-mobile mrežu SAD-a, dok sam bio u širem području regiona Frankfurta, Limburga i Visbadena, posebno krajem marta-početkom aprila 2008. godine, premošćavajući „t-mobile-D“, a ekran je pokazivao i telefon se ponašao kao da sam bio u SAD-u, i koja je veza toga sa prethodno rečenim.

I u vezi sa svim navedenim gore, pregled aktivnosti (REDIGOVANO), bilo da je ona vaša, ili imovina bilo koje agencije u SAD-u ili je sa vama na principu usluga-za-uslugu ili bilo kojom agencijom u SAD-u ili u bilo kojem svojstvu ili povezanim istragama ili akcijama iz prethodnih pasusa, sarađivala u nekoj istrazi ili povezanoj akciji koja me se tiče direktno ili indirektno, sa njom koja se sprijatelji sa mnom za potrebe bilo koje istrage u bilo kom momentu, ili tražeći dovoljno informacija da implicira, ali u stvari iz nehata i pogrešno implicira mene, u nedostatku dovoljno

informacija da me oslobodi, u vezi sa bilo kojim radnjama i/ili postojećim upućivanjem na vašu ili bilo koju agenciju u SAD-u, ili bilo koje osobe povezane sa takvim istragama, akcijama ili agencijama – koje utiču na moje beneficije socijalnog osiguranja na takav način da efikasno koriste službeno svojstvo da me dovedu pod jurisdikciju SAD-a, ili da se mešaju u moju slobodu kretanja ili bilo kako drugačije utiču na moje građanske slobode prema „R.I.C.O.“ kao kriminalna organizacija, ili pod bilo kojom drugom okolnošću povezanom sa prethodnim pasusima, uzrokuju neprikladan pregled mojeg dosijea socijalnog osiguranja što predstavlja maltretiranje i poteškoće u mom i životu članova moje porodice.

I zahtev da se Generalni inspektor za Ministarstvo pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država nezavisno raspita kod odgovarajućih vlasti u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj za bilo koje poznate činjenice istraga koje su možda vođene ili se vode u vezi sa bilo kojim/svim od prethodnog. Šaljem kao skrivenim primaocima (BCC) ovu komunikaciju dvojici advokata, jednom u SAD-u i jednom u Nemačkoj. Ovo NISU moji advokati. Kopiram njima zato što su odmereni ljudi za koje verujem da imaju najviše moguće etičke standarde i želim zapis ovog mejla u rukama trećih strana kojima verujem – što uključuje bilo koju zakonitu vlast, advokata ili drugu osobu kojoj mogu, po svom nahođenju, da dostave kopije ako naknadno odluče da je tako odgovarajuće.

S poštovanjem, Ronald Tomas Vest

Ovo pismo (iznad) nije odbio FBI mejl server, poslato je na albuquerque@fbi.gov, ali nije dugo prošlo pre što sam počeo da primam sledeći odgovor na mejlove koje sam slao FBI-u u Albukerkiju (ja sam, do tada, obaveštavao FBI o svojim aktivnostima).

Sledeće adrese imaju permanentne fatalne greške < albuquerque@fbi.gov> (razlog: 550 #5.1.0. adresa odbijena sylvia.maruffi@ic.fbi.gov)

Transkript sesije sledi …dok komunicira sa ic.fbi.gov.: RCPT za: <<< albuquerque@fbi.gov>… Korisnik nepoznat

Ovo (prethodno) pokazuje da su moji mejlovi prethodno imali rutu do „Slivije Marufi“, koja izgleda da je sklonjena, a njena adresa u kancelariji u Albukerkiju otkazana ili promenjena.

U nepovezanom prigovoru u Federalnom sudu u Albukerkiju koje je postavljeno na internet od strane jedne stranke u maju 2009. godine, našao sam sledeću izjavu:

„.. situaciju preispituje Silvija MARUFI, FBI istražni analitičar“

Ovo jasno pokazuje na FBI agenta Sliviju Marufi kojoj je dodeljeno da me istražuje sve do momenta kada sam poslao pismo FBI kancelariji u Albukerkiju 18. februara 2009. godine, a Marufi je jasno bila „osoba od interesa“ vezana za uporne pokušaje ubistva (mene). Uzgred, FBI nikada nije priznao moje (imejlom poslato) pismo od 18. februara 2009. godine, iako je jasno da su primili ovu komunikaciju.

6

Živeo sam u Berlinu od septembra 2010. do jula 2012. godine. Od nekoliko incidenata tokom ovog perioda, ovaj se izdvaja:

Dok sam živeo u Šarlotenbergu (Berlin) tokom jula 2011. godine, imao sam svoje prvo iskustvo sa obaveštajnim agencijama koje su koristile prozelitističke evangeliste kao paravan za tim ubica. Razmišljao sam malo o tome da li su „Jevreji za Isusa“ bili MOSAD ili zajednički poduhvat MOSAD/CIA, ali za sada bih ostao pri MOSAD-u. Članak Vejna Madsena je ukazao da je CIA koristila misionare u prošlosti, posebno u Latinskoj Americi, ali su Jevreji za Isusa potpuno druga vrsta. U Berlinu niko neće zabadati nos u posao bilo kog Jevreja, to je savršen paravan (mora da MOSAD tako misli). Ovo je izgleda bio još jedan slučaj „quid pro quo“ (prethodna MOSAD-ova razmena je bio pokušaj na liniji U7 u Berlinu, 14. oktobra 2007. godine) ili kada obaveštajna agencija jedne nacije radi u ime obaveštajne agencije druge nacije, ovo nije uopšte neobično.

To je dvostruko slepo poricanje ugrađeno u operacije, evangelistički Hrišćani koji se predstavljaju kao Jevreji. Četiri od pet, ili možda devet od deset ovih takozvanih „Jevreja za Isusa“ su prevareni i nesumnjivi evangelisti koji jednostavno pokušavaju da ubede ljude da budu „spašeni“. Dovoze ih avionima širom sveta u smenama, gde dobrovoljno

rade kao misionari, i podobni su i pri ruci da idu u bilo koje područje gde treba da se dogodi operacija ubijanja.

Meta treba da se navikne da ih viđa u svojoj okolini i to je ono što treba da napravi ugodno okruženje misionarima, dok se vaše navike proučavaju, kojim U-Bahn (metroom) putujete i uobičajeno vreme. Kada se meta navikne i ignoriše „Jevreje za Isusa“, sa uspostavljenom rutinom, nesumnjivi, prozelitistički članovi se zamene sa timovima ubica iz MOSAD-a koji nose majice „Jevreji za Isusa“, i meta (teorija mora da se održava) neće primetiti da je označena kada ulazi u metro gde će „najnehrišćanskija“ otrovna igla, koja ne može lako da se vidi na sigurnosnim kamerama, ubodom izazvati srčani udar u gomili ljudi, i tako se još jedan pridruži ljudima koji padnu mrtvi od prirodnih uzroka svakog dana, to je tako jednostavno. Osim kada nije tako jednostavno, kada je meta svesna onoga šta se dešava, zato što je obaveštajna agencija glupa.

Kada se Amerikanci koji su doveženi avionom sa Biblijskog pojasa Srednjeg zapada zamene Izraelcima čije je generalno ponašanje, izrazi lica i govor tela od glave do pete drugačiji od prevarenih evangelista (koji ne bi trebalo da, na kraju krajeva, budu iznenađeni što će stvarni Jevreji biti uključeni u njihovu organizaciju), to neće propustiti niko mog nivoa obuke. Bilo je to u Šarlotenbergu, primetio sam dva Izraelca kako proučavaju moje navike, dok su Amerikanci pokrivali veće javno područje kuda sam često išao, nekoliko dana, a onda su Izraelci motrili na moj ulaz u U-Bahn. Ušao sam, ali umesto da idem dole na drugi nivo i da uzmem voz, izašao sam na drugom ulazu, kao da sam koristio U-Bahn stanicu kao metod da prođem raskrsnicu bez dodira sa semaforima iznad zemlje, dok sam posmatrao pratioce koje sam mogao da primetim i naravno… jedan visoki Izraelac u civilnoj odeći (nije imao majicu „Jevreji za Isusa“) je promenio smer i pojavio se iza mene, ali ja sam bio spreman na to i postavio sam se leđima prema zidu kod stola kafića na otvorenom, između ljudi koji su takođe bili okrenuti prema njemu, leđima prema zidu i nije mogao da me pogodi iglom, a da se ne oda. Potpuno pogrešno mesto sa gomilom ljudi je bila moja prednost, a ne njegova. Glupo je izučavao događaj jedan minut, oklevajući, krećući da pođe, ponovo zastajući da prouči, pitajući se šta da uradi, dok je očigledno

iziritiran odustao i otišao dok sam ja uporno i direktno gledao u njega, a on u mene.

U avgustu 2012. godine, preselio sam se u malo selo na jugu Nemačke.

Beleška 15) U avgustu 2011. godine, (REDIGOVANO), koji je uglavnom izgubio kontakt sa mnom nakon što sam mu dostavio staklenu kuglicu iz moje kape u Visbadenu da dostavi na analizu, i nakon toga kada sam mu dostavio inkriminišući dosije Badger-Two-Medicine, kontaktirao me je samo toliko da napravi izgovor o prekidu naše bliske saradnje (optužio me je da sam pisao „Mržnju“ upućujući na moje satirične eseje) koja je trajala skoro dvadeset godina. Moj utisak je da je (REDIGOVANO) izgubio živce.

7

U novembru 2012. godine, posetio sam Berlin i imao blizak susret sa potencijalnim ubicom na U7 metrou (treći U7 pokušaj tokom 5 godina) i ovaj incident je bio, kao u poslovici, kap koja je prelila čašu.

Do tog momenta, više od pet godina su domaće nemačke vlasti bile svesne i/ili pratile moju odiseju, a da nisu preduzele akciju da izvrše pravdu, nisu hapsile i nisu sudski gonile, pa sam shvatio da neće nikakva akcija biti preduzeta sve dok je ulizica SAD-u, konzervativna vlada, na vlasti u Nemačkoj. Nakon što sam neko vreme razmišljao o tome, odlučio sam da udarim na nemačku vladu. Razvio sam pravnu strategiju da isprovociram Nemačku na Međunarodnom kriminalnom sudu, za podsticanje i pomaganje SAD-u u zločinima za koje SAD ne mogu direktno da budu tužene zato što SAD ne pripadaju Rimskom statutu, koji je napravio taj sud. Takođe sam odlučio da proguram informacije o Hrišćanskom ekstremizmu u Pentagonu, pomoću materijala koji sam dobio u neformalnoj saradnji sa Fondacijom za vojnu versku slobodu (od juna 2008. godine), o nemačkim parlamentarcima, zajedno sa obilnim anti-semitskim mejlom punim mržnje usmerenim protiv fondacije, koji mi je dao Majki Vajnstajn, predsednik MRFF (Fondacije za vojnu versku slobodu). Ovi napori su počeli iz mog skrovišta u južnoj Nemačkoj, 2013. godine.

Beleška 16) Prema izveštaju o istraživanju Vašington posta iz 2011. godine, „nekih 1 271 vladina organizacija i 1 931 privatna kompanija rade

na programima povezanim sa protivterorizmom, državnom bezbednošću i obaveštajnim radom na oko 10 000 lokacija širom Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Procena je da ok 854 000 ljudi, skoro jedan i po put više nego što Vašington D.C. ima stanovnika, imaju bezbednosna odobrenja najvišeg nivoa.“

Ovo je podržao članak na bloomberg.com: „Hiljade tehnoloških, finansijskih i proizvodnih kompanija radi blisko sa agencijama za nacionalnu bezbednost SAD-a, pružaju osetljive informacije i zauzvrat primaju beneficije koje uključuju pristup poverljivim, obaveštajnim podacima, reklo je četvoro ljudi koji su upoznati sa procesom. Ovi programi, čiji su učesnici poznati kao partneri od poverenja, sežu daleko izvan onoga što je otkrio Edvard Snouden, računarski tehničar koji je obavljao posao za Nacionalnu bezbednosnu agenciju“.

Dodatno, nadzorni organ Kongresa SAD-a, GAO (Vladina računovodstvena kancelarija), izveštava kao rezultat manjkavih podataka, obaveštajne agencije SAD-a: „nisu dobro pozicionirane da procene potencijalne efekte oslanjanja na osoblje ugovarača“

I onda, jedan oficir vojne obaveštajne agencije SAD-a je izjavio za Buzzfeed: „Mislim da ako bismo imali šansu, veoma brzo bismo to završili.“ [Obaveštajna služba SAD-a bi želela da nađe Snoudena]. „Ležerno se šeta ulicama Moskve, vraćajući se iz nabavke namirnica. Vraćajući se u svoj stan, slučajno ga ubode prolaznik. Misli da to nije ništa, kada posle nekog vremena počne da se oseća pomalo ošamućeno, i misli da je to parazit iz lokalne vode. Ode kući potpuno bezbrižno i sledeća stvar koju saznate je da je umro pod tušem“.

U stvari, većina nenavedenih događaja (u ovoj hronologiji) koje sam doživeo su imali veze sa uhodama, čije je ponašanje profilisano za akciju, kao što je opisano u prethodnom pasusu.

Ovo ukazuje na apsolutnu korupciju američke obaveštajne službe, gde korumpirani Pentagon, koji je bacio vladavinu prava kroz prozor, i povezane korumpirane korporativne ličnosti (npr. Hrišćanski ekstremisti Kondoliza Rajs i bivši vrhovni komandant NATO-a i Obamin savetnik za nacionalnu bezbednost general Džejms Džouns, u saradnji sa ŠEVRONOM) mogu da pristupe tajnom materijalu preko Pentagonske

NSA (Agencija za nacionalnu bezbednost) suštinski u bilo koju svrhu koju žele, sve do i uključujući i ubistvo.

8

2013. godina je bila uglavnom mirna, u vezi sa pokušajima mog ubistva, radio sam iz svoje sigurne kuće u južnoj Nemačkoj. Uspeo sam da podnesem tužbu kod Međunarodnog kriminalnog suda protiv Nemačke (trenutno na čekanju, jer je sud tražio dodatne informacije) i započeo sam kampanju da edukujem nemačke parlamentarce o hrišćanskom ekstremizmu koji vodi Pentagon, a koji inficira NATO. U septembru 2013. godine, preselio sam se u Lajpcig. U decembru 2013. godine sam otišao iz Nemačke da živim sa svojom devojkom u (REDIGOVANO). Prijavili smo se da živimo zajedno i tri nedelje kasnije, uručen mi je nalog Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova o proterivanju iz države. Nalog je bio na snazi širom Evropske Unije, i kao posledica toga, bio sam pod svakodnevnom pretnjom deportacije u SAD. Krajnje je nemoralno da me prisiljavaju da tražim politički azil u ovim okolnostima, ali u stvari to je tačno ono što može da bude potrebno u ovoj stalnoj lakrdiji od pravde, u kojoj su pravne institucije odbile da krenu protiv kriminalaca koje sam izložio vlastima.

9

Rezultat onoga što sam nazvao „alfa“ istragom je jasan.

Korporativni organizovani kriminal u vojno-industrijskom kompleksu u dosluhu sa institucijama u NATO-u i odmetnutim elementima u obaveštajnim agencijama (sa izvan orvelovskim obrtom kada je ubačen „Hrišćanski dominionizam“), zajedno formiraju jednu međunarodnu „duboku državu“ koja je posvećena subverziji i eventualnom svrgavanju i/ili kontroli zapadnih demokratskih institucija. Nemačka vlada i organi za sprovođenje zakona su sada potpuno svesni „alfa“ elemenata koji su operisali izvan parametara zakona u Nemačkoj. Uzgred, alfina operaciona komanda i kontrola smeštena u SAD-u je zastrašila nemački politički establišment na najvišim nivoima.

Sa nemačkom vladom, dobro upoznatom sa svim neophodnim činjenicama u vezi sa „alfom“, od policije na lokalnom nivou do glavnih političara u Nemačkoj, zaista postoji još malo stvari koje mogu da se

postignu. „Alfin“ istražni rezultat se ne može gurati pod tepih doveka, previše ljudi sada zna šta se dešava i na kraju, ja imam malo kontrole nad tim kada će to izaći na videlo ili kako će se razvijati kasnije. Ovo će imati veze sa preostalim institucijama u vezi sa vladavinom prava koje još nisu preuzete od strane kriminalne organizacije iza „alfe“. Nepobitna je odgovornost ovih institucija da poguraju napred informacije koje su iznete i okružuju „alfu“; u pravcu ponovnog uspostavljanja autentičnog ustavnog poretka.

Beleška 17) U Nemačkoj, gde nema oklevanja da se hapse i sudski gone islamističke terorističke ćelije, čvrsto rešene da izvrše zaveru za ubistvo, pet uzastopnih nemačkih ministara unutrašnjih poslova nisu uspeli da deluju protiv istog ponašanja kada se ono vrši od strane ili u ime hrišćanskih ekstremista u američkim obaveštajnim službama i povezanih korumpiranih ličnosti koje vrše zločine na nemačkom tlu. Ti nemački ministri unutrašnjih poslova, po redu svog nameštenja u ministarstvu su:

Wolfgang Schäuble, 22. novembar 2005. do 28. oktobra 2009. Thomas de Maizière, 28. oktobar 2009. do 3. marta 2011. Hans-Peter Friedrich, 3. mart 2011. do 17. decembra 2013. Thomas de Maizière, 17. decembar 2013. do 14. marta 2018. Horst Seehofer, 14. mart 2018. do sada.

Post scriptum beleška bi bila da su se slučaj svete zemlje Blekfita iz Montane i čarter škole Ist Mauntin u Novom Meksiku desili uporedo, a na kraju su bili konvergentni; ukrštajući zajedničke ili povezane interese u vojno-industrijskom kompleksu.

Ronald Tomas Vest, maj 2021.

Srbija

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

This essay goes to the matter of Kosovo; where the Western states (NATO & the EU) has determined Serbia is not fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Albanians) on their own (Serbian) territory but the now purported (by the West) independent Kosovo is fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Serbs.)

The EU position seems to embrace attitude of ‘never mind the inconvenient fact’ that recent Kosovo ‘leaders’ are being arrested and delivered to international tribunal for crimes against ethnic Serbs (includes organ harvesting), also not to mention what amounts to mere ‘lip service’ (no concrete action or enforcement) concerning the repatriation of 250,000 Serbs driven from Kosovo in an ethnic Albanian engineered cleansing pogrom following the NATO bombing of Serbia.

Insofar as an EU repatriation precedent, Croatia’s ethnic cleansing of Srpska Krajina shows the dishonesty of the EU position; there is no realistic expectation (and never was) by the European Union that the 200,000 Serbs expelled from this (formerly) Serb majority region would be allowed to return to Croatia and their homes. Meanwhile Croatia had been admitted to the European Union.

So, in the context of Serbs are not trustworthy to govern an ethnic minority of Albanians but Albanians are trustworthy to govern a minority of Serbs, the EU de facto embraces (actual outcomes, not political postures) just the sort of ethnic cleansing the NATO bombing was supposed to stop?

NATO ‘just allowed’ another massive pogrom to happen when they’d gained control over Kosovo? Huh. Maybe that Albanian ‘majority’ wasn’t statistically big enough to justify an independent Kosovo (and secure a now ostensibly ‘independent’ Kosovo a ‘right’ to host Camp Bondsteel.)

Now, in this tangled pressures of arbitrary jurisdictions imposed on Serbia by the EU, NATO and the American military occupation of Serbia’s southern-most province of Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel), it should do to breakdown the logistics of the Western democracies dishonest game.

“Camp Bondsteel is the main base of the United States Army under KFOR command in Kosovo. Located near Ferizaj in the eastern part of Kosovo, the base serves as the NATO headquarters for KFOR’s Multinational Battle Group East”

The order is interesting, as well, the nomenclature. The American army figures first (“main base of the United States Army”) ‘under’ (watch how this deceit plays out) KFOR command … serves as NATO’s headquarters for KFOR’s Multinational Battlegroup ..” or in the deciphered military ‘Orwellian-speak’ the American dominated NATO (every NATO “Supreme Allied Commander Europe” has been an American general throughout NATO’s history) keeps a “Battle Group” in Kosovo. This language is entirely inconsistent with ‘peace keeping.’ It is worth noting here, it had been when this occupying force had been 50,000 strong and deployed across Kosovo, Kosovo’s ethnic Albanians were ‘somehow’ allowed to push 250,000 Serbian civilians out of Kosovo in a pogrom that can only be defined as ethnic cleansing in violation of international human rights conventions.

In short other words, the KFOR mission established to bring an end to the fighting, between the Serbian army and the Kosovo Liberation Army, after the Serb army was withdrawn, KFOR clearly took the side of the Kosovo Liberation Army and ‘stood guard’ as the KLA (an insurgent army) was allowed to push 250,000 Serb residents out of homes in their own country, an event the Serb army had prevented prior to NATO establishing control.

Now, the preceding evolving into a NATO ‘authority’ had been extrapolated from UN Resolution 1244 which language is quite inconsistent with the historical reality…

“to resolve the grave humanitarian situation in Kosovo, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and to provide for the safe and free return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes”

…while noting Kosovo is entered into the UN record as territory belonging to Serbia (Yugoslavia being a union of Serbia & Montenegro at this time.)

In short, on the pretext of ‘humanitarian intervention’ via a UN Resolution that NATO had never intended to honor (‘the proof is in the pudding’), an illegal insurgency had been morphed, via geopolitical chicanery, into a rouge ‘state’ governed by KLA war criminals secured by NATO.

“Transcendent Corruption” is the value I have assigned to the parties embracing ‘color of law’ (a veneer of legality masking corruption) wherein law is made to serve the interests of autocrats (e.g. Merkel), plutocrats (e.g. the Clinton & Biden families), & oligarchies (e.g. the European Union) and when taken together amount to rule by the most powerful corporate board personalities (the puppeteers) in the 21st Century model of feudalism manifesting as fascism but is labelled democracy to assuage the peasants (the citizens) sensibilities.

All of this follows on historical facts overlooked by the Western propaganda machine; Eastern Orthodoxy’s majority Serbian population in the region of Srpska Krajina recently (90s Balkan Wars) had been ethnically cleansed from Catholic Croatia by “Operation Storm” (never mind the Serbs have been made the boogeyman for everything that went wrong with the breakup of Yugoslavia), as well the fact unnatural ethnic borders have been enforced in relation to Republik Srpska, ensuring there will be ongoing tensions within Bosnia on the border of Serbia and not least, the remnant Serb majority region in the North of Kosovo is denied their right of self determination to join with Serbia, ensuring perpetual inter-ethnic conflict that serves only to weaken the institutions of state via ongoing radicalization of both populations, Orthodox Christian Serb and Muslim Albanian. And then, we have Metohija or the bona fide historical spiritual center of the Serbian people of the past 1,000 years.

It must be noted that, similar to the Sioux Indians had founded their culture upon a spiritual relationship to the Black Hills of South Dakota from which they had been expelled, Serbia’s relationship to “Old Serbia” (Kosovo) is little different; imperial ambition had seen the Serbs ethnically cleansed by the Albanians on multiple occasions, first under the ‘patronage’ of the Ottoman Turks favoring the Islamic population, then a minority, and after, the Albanians were backed in further pursuing pogroms against Serbs of Kosovo by the fascist Axis powers of World War II (similar to Croatian Ustasha persecution of Serbs during the war) pushing more of the Serb population out, wherein a coup de grace of sorts was delivered by communism under Tito, who forbade ethnic Serbs to return to their homes in Kosovo following 1945. This is a legacy NATO has furthered as ‘enforcers’ of wresting away Kosovo from Serbia. Kosovo is the original “Old Serbia” that continues to hold the center of Serbian cultural identity via the (ongoing) monastic tradition of Orthodoxy in the region of Metohija.

Then, steps into this mess the last people (if they had any sense of shame at all) who should mediate the current tensions, the Germans, Angela Merkel, particularly, and more recently, Ursula von der Leyen, whose family pedigree is a who’s who of empire personalities that cannot help perception in a Serbia whose memories of the NAZI occupation are still sharp.

‘Mediating’ the current controversy where Kosovo’s criminal administration (under the ‘protection’ of NATO) is allowing radical Wahhabism to proselytize the ethnic Albanian population away from the more moderate mainstream of Islam in the cradle of the Orthodox Serb civilization, Europe demanding Serbia recognize and do business with a cabal of criminals couldn’t do a better job of promoting a war of civilizations if it had actually tried; if one were to presume it is mere incompetence derived from ego-narcissism has birthed this circumstance into the present. But maybe it is more than that, a weakened Serbia with artificial borders is ‘low hanging fruit’ with possibility of consolidating control over a region culturally tied to Russia, as well, historically coveted by the Catholic headquarters at Rome.

In the many geopolitical machinations employed by Merkel, von der Leyen, Trump (and now Biden), not to mention the ‘rolling over’ to sound of a dog-whistle by Serbian sell-outs Vucic & Brnabic, there is a canine turd on the table no one dares mention: the Western Christianity’s animus towards Eastern Orthodoxy, particularly Slav Orthodoxy. The smell is in the air.

“…keeping in mind the fact that Bishop Grigorije has a very strong influence among the bishops, the regime has decided to do everything possible to reduce the chances that a man opposed to the government would be elected the new patriarch.

“That is why the confrontation with Grigorije, who has repeatedly said what he thinks about the “golden age of Serbia”, is becoming more and more acute and dangerous. Although the reason for this is his interview given almost a month ago, the fact remains that Grigorije is a threat the regime’s plans on two fronts which is more than enough reason to present this priest from Herzegovina as Serbia’s greatest enemy and a man who “divides the believers”.

“The matrix is always the same – the opponent is first dragged through the mud by the media, with the media, which broadcast on national frequencies, usually discovering “unknown facts”, i.e. false information, about him and his life.

“If this is not enough, they move on to the recording of videos in which “brave”, albeit unknown reporters, question the human characteristics of the victim of persecution, which is also an open invitation to lynch. Those who do not understand this, just think back of how Oliver Ivanović died”

Finally, something a little closer the real reasons behind the invitation to make the assassination manifest:

“…the instigators of the smear campaign against the bishop decided to take advantage of the fact that he does not share the vision of “progressive” Serbia and the Church and thus mark him as a traitor, while creating the impression that it would be a patriotic act to remove [assassinate] such a person” [1]

The lie of the Serbian state (Vucic oligarchy) concerning Bishop Gregorije being in opposition to the church is egregious; the Church position has always been Metohija is, and always will be, Serbia. Insofar as ‘progressive’, the ‘progress’ of the (German controlled) European Union has been little short of demanding an European monoculture derive from the social tensions born of multiculturalism. It is unnatural process, devoid of community spirit, temporally corrupt in the extreme and founded upon geopolitical propaganda lies, as has been the entire business of an independent Kosovo. Post 1945, the Reich is realizing its vision ‘over the long game.’ Recalling Rome’s embrace of Sainthood for the Catholic (Nazi collaborator) Alojzije Stepinac, it is perfectly clarified Slav Orthodoxy has no place in this ‘vision.’

If there were the slightest intention to preserve the integrity of Serb Orthodoxy in the machinations of Western Europe in the Balkans, Vucic would propose, Brnabic would initiate and the European Union would endorse an exclave of Serbian territory in that remaining portion of Metohija that is majority Serb populated. It would have more population than some United Nations states and there is precedence in Azerbaijan’s exclave Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. But, no, this is not on the table, it is intended Slav Orthodoxy will be strangled and made extinct (replaced with ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholicism) in the Balkans.

Populism, and related nationalism, manifest in two forms, the healthy and the unhealthy, the benign and the malignant, the tranquil and the rage. The EU, NATO, and yes, the Church at Rome, all, have a hand in fostering the unhealthy, the malignant, and the rage. The epilogue of this would be the conversion of Serbia to “progressive” European monoculture at the point of a gun.

“There is not the smallest reason for confounding nationalism, which is the desire of a people to be itself, with imperialism, which is the desire of a people to prevent other peoples from being themselves” -Cicily Isabel Fairfield

 

[1] https://archive.li/DrMu2

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

There is a glowing review of Obama-esque ‘hope’ concerning the nomination of William ‘Bill’ Burns as the new administration’s Director of CIA. The review is plausible/improbable & outcome remains to be seen. [1]

Written by an Indian diplomat, M K Bhadrakumar, he takes an interesting quote from Burn’s book ‘The Back Channel: A Memoir of American Diplomacy and the Case for its Renewal‘ in a context of less ‘militarization’ wherein Burns asserts American diplomacy should:

“…harness all the tools of American statecraft – from the soft power of ideas, culture, and public diplomacy, to … intelligence-gathering and covert action”

As well, Bhadrakumar notes:

“Burns is widely praised as a titan of the foreign policy world and also happens to belong to that breed of diplomats who believe that diplomacy and espionage are two sides of the same coin”

One presumes the article & quotes more or less exclude CIA paramilitary operations (e.g. Syria) as a direction that should be emphasized in Burns’ philosophy as the new Director of Central Intelligence.

But, there is this other point, in case of Burn seeing diplomacy & espionage as “two side of the same coin” where in fact the CIA & USA’s Department of State are historically more like ‘Siamese twins.’ This second is a qualified point that sees things a bit differently than two sides of the same coin (public postures vs back-stabbing acts) in a matter of Siamese twins or more than one cognitive process pushing or initiating policy in fact. This is more than a typical two-faced ‘diplomacy’ coin, in a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is up to.

Of course, as always, it will be the factual legacy Burns leaves behind him that will determine what will be and what came to naught. In this vein, it should do to examine a bit (just a bit) of Burns’ history, raise a question and propose a litmus test.

My recollection of Bill Burns in respect to Iran is a bit different to the pundits of the present; as a matter of fact Burns has been in past circumstance of having to work with some of the USA’s nastiest ‘diplomatic’ personalities and guilt by association, e.g. a murderess or the murderous Condoleezza Rice, is ‘just deserts’ in the political game. [2]

That Burns is presumably a good reporter of facts is no solid indicator his proposed philosophical outlook will be of any significance whatsoever. [3]

The question posed is, how much control over the actual function of the CIA Burns will actually possess (or even care to possess.) He will be pressed from above and below to implement criminal policies, and authorize criminal acts. His superiors are incompetent politicians steeped in aggressive geopolitical lies & greed, e.g. ‘The Russians did it’, no matter if or when the Russians did not do it & rank corporate corruption or practically unlimited “Citizens United” undisclosed PAC money and; his minions (senior CIA operatives), are quite frankly, tactically & socially stupid, not only patently treasonous, international criminals. [4]

Litmus test: when the present and two preceding FBI directors (Mueller, Comey & Wray), all of them, have shielded a narcotics cartel hit-man (serial killer), that is Enrique ‘ricky’ Prado, for the fact Prado doubled as a high ranking CIA officer-operative, does Burns stop protecting Prado, allowing prosecutions to go forward, or does Burns consider shielding Prado that part of “covert action” that is legitimate ‘statecraft’? [5]

In fact it is time someone cleaned up the CIA’s act. Will Burns do it or will he even exercise control over an agency shielding numerous rank killers, not only Prado? Does the Obama-Brennan era extra-judicial “Kill List” targeting American citizens, and the harassment, sabotaging the personal lives of, and framing of dissident Americans living abroad (a laundered, CIA version of the FBI’s COINTELPRO) cease and desist or do these mafia quid pro quo programs see new ‘life’ breathed into them? [6]

This target (yours truly) wants to know. Because as of this week, in Serbia, it is become clear the ‘dogs have not been called off.’ [7]

But maybe I should know already. The counter-point analysis that should be read, relating to Burns’ “The Back Channel”, describes a man incapable of comprehending his failures. The teaser from John Helmer:

“William Burns is the man who might have been US Secretary of State if Hillary Clinton had been elected President in November 2016. Since then he has been composing an apologia pro vita sua — a book of religious convictions describing what went wrong through no fault of his own or of God’s, explaining what a victim Burns and the United States have been of bad luck; bad timing; President Donald Trump’s “narcissism”, “erratic leadership” and “active sabotage”; and Russian malevolence

“To the ex-Ambassador to Russia and ex-Deputy Secretary of State, the Russian evil is a motiveless, psychopathological crime. Russians, especially the few high-ranking ones Burns met as a State Department apparatchik, can’t help themselves. There is no cause and effect between action and reaction, between US offence and Russian defence. Nothing Christian Brothers alumni and missionary Americans like Burns have done explains (in Burns’s tract) why the Russians behave so badly, and why their souls must forever burn in hell unless they repent. Five hundred pages of holier-than-thou, confessor to the wicked Russians — that’s been the Burns mission” [8]

 

[1] https://archive.li/zsNyv

[2] https://archive.li/LTrhx

[3] https://archive.li/Wxt3x

[4] https://archive.li/tub2k

[5] https://archive.li/V8wJ3

[6] https://archive.li/yBeG2

[7] https://archive.li/1lIpv

[8] https://archive.li/LHS2R

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

^ Bellingcat, er, Bill the Cat

Navalny poses as a higher ranking ‘apparatchik’ within Russia’s security services, scrambling to understand what went wrong with the plot to murder (himself) with the nerve agent novichok. He (Navalny) ostensibly has reached one of the foot-soldiers (a Russian intelligence services officer, at his home phone) tasked with carrying out Navalny’s assassination (I would have said you can’t make this shit up except for someone clearly did.) The hoax is audacious.

The 1st problem with Navalny’s ‘hoax call’ reported by Bellingcat is the dates. The 2nd problem is Bellingcat is the reporter. Or, you can switch the order, these are co-equal problems, followed by a 3rd problem that is the call itself.

1) The poisoning happened on 20 August, the ‘hoax call’ is made on 14 December, and released by Bellingcat on 21 December. Now, wait a minute. The context of the call, a desperate demand for answers of what went wrong (Navalny didn’t die) for a report to higher up authority, is something you would expect within the first 48 hours, not nearly three months later. By the time this call was made, that dust should have settled and been vacuumed up by Russia’s intelligence services, everyone would have been debriefed by this time, including the target of the hoax call.

2) Bellingcat is an organization on the point of ‘the Russians did it’ (or the Russians should be held responsible, even if they didn’t do it) world information warfare stage from Syria chemical warfare crimes to MH17 to the Skripal poisoning to (now) Navalny (and whatever else escapes my memory at the moment.)

Every reasonably competent intelligence officer from either side of the ongoing state of warfare between the NATO & NATO associated intelligence agencies, and Russia, perfectly assumes Bellingcat is a front for British intelligence, if they are honest, which is forbidden in this case, if you work for Western intelligence (as well, the CIA might easily request a favor from MI6 and its proxy Bellingcat, time to time.) Of course, if you are Russian, it is not permitted in the liberal democracies to believe anything you have to say (whether truthful or not.)

3) The recorded call itself requires you to believe Russian intelligence officers assigned to assassinations are 85 IQ troglodytes in eternal state of drunk or hungover. That works, if you are a Robert Littell (CIA disinformation) spy novel fan or, alternatively, a 007 freak where Russian intelligence operatives, when it comes to assassinations, are so muscle-bound around the head, there is no space left for brains (having all been squeezed out by steroids, obviously.) But the propaganda ploy works for precisely the subliminal stereotype created in the Western media audience; at many levels we all are conditioned (or attempted to be conditioned) to believe the stereotypes.

At 14 minutes in, there are real questions. He’s too slow & dumb (the FSB guy) he should have been wide awake by now, this all seems scripted. Do we know it is actually the Russian officer on the other end? Rather, is it a MI6 or CIA actor? In the very early stages (long before the 14th minute), the ‘Russian’ intelligence officer should have demanded to make the call himself, calling back from a secure phone to his interrogator (after confirming with his own chain of command), at the least. I can’t believe the Russians are without strict protocol training in this regard. The so-called ‘Konstantin Kudryavtsev’ (a real person but certainly not the person in the call) is too stupid, by far, to demand this obviously important security protocol, and that stupidity is covered by the very fact of discussing ‘a secure line’ while posing him as half-awake & consequently ‘snookered.’ But even a hungover and half-awake 85 IQ (if such ever existed in the FSB, not likely) should grasp violating this protocol while running his mouth could find him hung upside down in chains in the basement of the Lubyanka (FSB Headquarters in Moscow) while his bosses decided what would become of him. This raises a related issue; why would someone who’d so famously screwed up a hit still be on the job? The entire business stinks from the beginning.

Then, at 18 minutes in, the ‘Russian’ troglodyte is volunteering via unsecured line a local investigative chief’s phone number to a ‘superior officer’ (Navalny’s alias) that prior to this call he has never even heard of:

It just goes downhill from there…

The concluding question should be, did Nalvany understand he had been talking to a Western intelligence asset/actor? The answer would be “probably not.” Narcissists are brilliant material for intelligence agency manipulations, in this case of Western intelligence engineering (from the outset) Nalvany being of greater value as an information operations asset in Berlin as opposed to a perpetually failed color revolutionary in Russia.

 

Related: Initial impression in the Navalny ‘poisoning’ (22 August)

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

So, Navalny’s Soros worshiping clique is asserting he has been poisoned. Immediately a plane is dispatched from Germany to snatch his body (lingering with a bit of inconvenient life) or better said, ‘rescue’ a gravely ill man from the nefarious Russian state; invoking the ghosts of Litvinenko, Nemtsov (oops, he was shot, not poisoned), and Skripal.

What do all of the above share in common?

1) None of them were in any sense a threat to Putin or the Russian state, in short, all of them had either outlived their usefulness (Litvinenko, Skripal) or never lived up to the expectations (Nemtsov, Navalny) of the West’s propaganda machine (read manipulations by foreign intelligence agencies.)

2) All of them become more useful to the West’s propaganda machine when dead, rather than appearing increasingly impotent, or irrelevant, while alive. How? Their deaths can be blamed on EVIL PUTIN!

Now, before we delve into the unthinkable, let’s (merely for the sake of argument) all rollover and assume Navalny has been poisoned. But not necessarily by the Russian state.

What?! If you have no conscience or soul (a prime ‘talent’ for those waging clandestine warfare via assassinations on behalf of the state) or simply ‘believe’ a wrong can be made into a right (along the lines of thinking ‘Navalny will never pull a color revolution off in Russia, but if Putin ‘poisons’ him, and this helped the West, no doubt he’d understand’ (you know, the future debriefing of Navalny in a WASP/Catholic chapter of Heaven that more or less excludes the Orthodox albeit with ‘chosen’ Soros sponsored exceptions.)

To demonstrate the pure hypocrisy of the West pointing to Putin and the ‘Russian regime’ as ‘poisoners’ one need look no farther than Western intelligence agencies own enraged idiots that cannot keep their mouths shut, this ‘gem’ of an example came in the wake of the Snowden revelations:

“…a US Army Intelligence Officer stated to Buzzfeed: “I think if we had the chance, we would end it very quickly.” [USA intelligence would like to find Snowden] “Just casually walking on the streets of Moscow, coming back from buying his groceries. Going back to his flat and he is casually poked by a passerby. He thinks nothing of it at the time starts to feel a little woozy and thinks it’s a parasite from the local water. He goes home very innocently and next thing you know he dies in the shower.” [1]

Now, if perennial color revolution non-threat Navalny risks looking ultimately impotent (he’d been at it too long with too little result) and would serve the interests of empire better if suddenly dead, and indeed he had been poisoned, probably the Russian state should be the last suspect. So, if it wasn’t Putin, who was it? News for you Kira Yarmysh, Ivan Zhdanov, Leonid Volkov, Cinema for Peace, Pussy Riot and countless other manipulated  stooges, chances are that Navalny, if actually poisoned, was hit by Western intelligence for the fact he was ineffective and therefor ‘transitioned’ from a useless idiot into a useful dead idiot. That thought brings up a bit of recent news:

“A minister has revealed real James Bonds can now eliminate enemies in countries other than war zones.

“Defence minister Annabel Goldie was asked if UK agents target foes “located in non-belligerent states”

“She replied: “The Government may draw on wide a range of tools including lethal force where there is no other effective option” [2]

There you go; United Kingdom had just gone on record as authorizing its intelligence agencies to carry out assassinations in Russia (among other countries.) Meanwhile Putin doesn’t need (or want) the negative publicity of another murder falsely pinned on his ‘regime’, for ‘edification’ in these matters, check out the alternative Skripal narratives, there’s plenty of credible investigators with sites proposing and/or developing evidence refuting the official line. [3], [4], [5], [6]

News for all of you Soros wannabe color revolutionaries, if you think Bernard Émié, Alex Younger, Gina Haspel, Bruno Kahl, Yossi Cohen, or any of the rest of the Western intelligence heads, actually care so much as a rat’s ass about people like Navalny, you’re as dumb as anything has ever set foot in God’s creation. If Navalny were convertible from a color revolution useless idiot to a Western intelligence propaganda operation’s useful dead idiot, to better serve the agenda of Western intelligence, that’s exactly what he’d be, a useful dead idiot. It is not only perfectly plausible that’s what happened to Litvinenko, Skripal, and if poisoned, now Navalny, it is actually far more likely Western intelligence did it than any likelihood these morons had been hit by the Russian state.

Alexey Navalny 2017.jpg

^ the look of mental hemorrhoids 

Follow-up article on Navalny: The Hoax Call

 

[1] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/bennyjohnson/americas-spies-want-edward-snowden-dead

[2] https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/britains-real-life-007s-licence-22527547

[3] http://johnhelmer.net/

[4] https://patrickarmstrong.ca/

[5] http://www.theblogmire.com/

[6] https://gordonhahn.com/

My 1st experience with inspectors general was in 1971 Vietnam where the soldier’s complaints, that our good cafeteria food was being sold through military organized crime to markets and restaurants in the city of Vung Tau, were absolutely covered up by the military watchdog. When a congressman actually showed up to discover for himself what was going on, our meals became excellent for just a few days and then, with the congressman’s departure, our food reverted to nearly inedible survival rations.

My next experience with attorney generals was when investigating a criminal ring working the inside of government for Chevron Corporation, counterfeiting environmental impact statements for purpose of allowing oil and gas development to proceed in areas that should have been protected.

When provided hard documentation of multiple instance of the Forest Service inside cheating (the FBI refused to investigate) of laws to benefit the outside industry, the Department of Agriculture Inspector General simply evaded responsibility by pointing out these issues had been brought up in another bureaucratic channel in an appeal (to be decided by the Forest Service!)

So now, all of these years later, Trump fires the Department of State’s Inspector General Steve Linick and ‘Corona Trillions’ overseer (former Department of Justice Inspector General) Glenn Fine and it all still ties into my experience with the preceding case of the Forest Service, nearly thirty years on.

In short, after Chevron insider Condoleezza Rice became Bush Jr’s National Security Advisor, it would seem a ‘Chevron enemies’ list had transferred to the USA executive branch. It was in 2004 my house was searched without a warrant (while I was out of town) and it had become clear multiple investigations had been opened into my activities with specious rationale or on false pretexts.

This seemed odd as my investigative career had been closed for five years and it been thirteen years since the incriminating, investigative dossier on Chevron had been compiled and forwarded through several official channels. Looking into matters, by 2005 it became clear the source of the present harassment stemmed via local members of the Council on Foreign Relations, leaning on the area’s FBI field office and local law enforcement.

By 2006 it was determined by myself this was developing into one of those circumstance where the target (myself) was high priority and it would be best to get out of the USA.

My house sold in the early summer of 2007 and I left the USA on the pretext of attending a conference at Johannes Gutenberg University, but did not catch my return flight from Europe, and the attempted assassination game was on.

Glenn Fine was Department of Justice Inspector General in 2010 when I attempted to bring my case of the FBI apparently assisting the CIA (and possibly MOSSAD) with attempted assassination of myself. This stemmed from my work on the 1991 Chevron & Forest Service misconduct previously mentioned.

My experience with inspector generals is that of a rank fail, relating to the FBI’s egregious conduct in ‘investigating’ myself actually appears to have been opening my banking information (via ‘national security letter’) to Central Intelligence so my location could be tracked by ATM while I was on the run in Europe from Condoleezza’s (as far as it could be traced to the top) ‘kill list’ (prior to Obama and his Brennan kill list.)

When Obama came into office, the presidential ‘kill list’ became a matter of public record. There has been no known investigation into this by any inspector general, either Department of Justice or Department of State. My own case is well known in detail with as yet unanswered (after 10 years) request for a Department Of Justice Inspector General (Glenn Fine in 2010) look at my circumstance on Obama’s watch. Certainly in some circumstance the duopoly has each others’ backs.

What’s more is, during the tenure of Steve Linick, the Department of State’s Office of the Inspector General has made it as burdensome as possible to actually make contact and pursue whistle-blowing with a closed email system that refuses to recognize ‘unauthorized’ contacts (i.e. anyone outside the system or anyone who hasn’t been extended the ‘grace’ of their email address admitted into the system) rather demanding all process concerning complaints and related documentation be sent and replies accepted by fax or snail mail which (probably by design) insures the geolocation of the whistle-blower.

Even with the valid email address of the appropriate government officials to contact, if your email address is either unrecognized or recognized as someone they do not wish to interact with, the closed system will not allow your messages through. This was discovered by myself when I looked into making a complaint concerning egregious misconduct by certain Department of State officers when applying for routine services of a personal, family nature I will not divulge here.

These officers (almost certainly CIA under official cover) were so determined to deny certain rights in attempt to  force me to present myself in person, the end result is, there are two diametrically opposed decisions by separate USA embassies in two countries in Europe, one granting and the other denying, identical citizen services based on decisions where the one embassy granted the service based on lesser documentation than the embassy that denied the identical service based on stronger documentation!

The difference in the embassies? The granting embassy is in a ‘settled’ western European country where highly competent local professionals are incorporated into the citizen services staff in a small annex that would basically make a rendition impossible, whereas the denying embassy is a CIA infested organism located in a former socialist state that is a target of empire’s demands to conform, where there is a weak rule of law and the citizens services is located in a very large embassy compound from which renditions can be made with impunity.

Ultimately I declined to exercise my right to make a complaint of egregious misconduct by the Department of State to Steve Linick, fully understanding it would be an energy draining exercise in futility.

Essentially, the demand is, if you are the target of the USA, live in a former socialist state under threat of color revolution and also happen to be a USA citizen filing a complaint, paint a bull’s eye on your chest and only then step up with your incriminating information when whistle-blowing to the Department of State Inspector General.

What is different with the inspector generals now is, there is a deep state internecine war with the more overt evangelical/Israeli alliance pitted against the neo-liberal/never-Trump Republican alliance. But on either side, they are all bought and paid for American political pit bulls fighting behind the scenes in off record venues. Without exception, they’re all corrupt.

The difference between American empire run by Democrats & ‘Never Trump!’ Republicans versus the Christian Zionists & Israeli controlled Trump, is the difference between botched operations with & without anesthesia; with the former, the numb but nevertheless soon to be cadaver, lingers just a little longer, with the latter, panic, pain & shock contributes to a bit quicker demise.

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

This article may also be read at Fort Russ News

Hapsburg_Satan - 1

This Hapsburg Satan killed thousands of animals, in a single sustained rage, over several weeks, denuding a vast noble estate of all forest life

Cicily Isabel Fairfield, one of those rare social observers with penetrating insight into the hypocrisies of Western culture, speaking to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his assassin Gavrilo Princip, sums up more or less so:

The murder was absolutely to be expected simply from a perspective of social dynamics. Princip aimed his pistol from the absolute bottom of the oppressed and shot dead a principal at the apex of the oppression.

She goes into great detail, with explanation of both backgrounds, and how the archduke and Princip were production of peak and basement of the (then) existing hierarchy. Insofar as nastiness of character, violence of personality and murderous motivations, one might say the archduke was Satan himself, assassinated by a child resident drawn from an Austrian ruled Hell where his parents had been framed as criminal and confined in that domain for the simple fact of being born Serb peasants in Bosnia.

Fairfield’s observations were drawn from contemporary sources, including interviewing eyewitnesses to the last meeting of the archduke, one witness who remarkably noted the archduke practically goosestepped in circles, tweeting in reedy voice, while acting the complete idiot in taking the travel decision that got him killed. If it wasn’t absolute incompetence or an intuitive suicide, then certainly it was fate (policy) killed this Hapsburg Satan.

In the present day, Gavrilo Princip’s ‘hero’ status is largely reduced to the Serb ethnicity; the Muslim Bosniaks who were placed as overlord to Serbs under the Austrian empire see him as a “terrorist” (who’d actually displaced their privileged position), the Croats hate him for the fact he was an ethnic Serb (the pro-Catholic, pro-German, Croatian prejudice opposed to all things Orthodox) and of course ‘mainstream’ Europe’s narrative has nothing or little to say in regards to the assassination’s actual causation by Austrian policy of domestic state terror, practiced by the Hapsburgs, in relation to their subject(ed) peoples.

It followed, the several European monarchs’ demise in the wake of the first two world wars changed nothing in matters of European social habit; today’s practical royals, represented in the likes of the many tyrants or Merkels, Netanyahus and Erdogans of this world, are at the head of what amounts to de facto monarchies (so-called ‘democracies’) whose’ noble class are the large corporate stakeholders, especially the military industrial stakeholders (as it ever were.)

Today’s is merely a repackaged, old state terror model, with modern subject(ed) peoples conditioned to their serfdom as ‘consumers.’ On the backs of taxing the common people, false-flag perpetrated wars of empire go on, with the current era little different to yesteryear’s; coupled to the modern pseudo-politicians’ impunity very much a royal clone of centuries past.

If Gavrilo Princip was an assassin, he certainly was also an involuntary expression of a culture whose’ rulers engage their respective peoples in a predator-prey relationship.

It is for these reasons it would seem World War III is inevitable. The template of Western or European civilization, in and of itself, is culturally a leopard and leopards, it should be honestly said, cannot shed their spots.

 

This article may also be read at Fort Russ News

An Exposé of Semi-Farcical Reality in Today’s Realpolitik

gonads |ˈgōnads|
noun
vulgar slang a man’s testicles.

We begin with John Helmer’s excellent reporting, that at the beginning of 2017, Assange offered to give up Wikileaks to the Americans for his freedom:

In retrospect, the Waldman-Warner texts reveal that it was Assange’s intention to use Waldman to make a connection, not to the Kremlin, but to the US Government, trading Wikileaks for Assange’s freedom. Assange was requesting, so Waldman told Warner, safe passage to Washington and release from threats of US prosecution in return for information regarding “future leaks” and a promise not “to do something catastrophic for the dems, Obama, CIA and national security”. Waldman wrote that to Warner on February 16, 2017, adding: “I hope someone will consider getting him to the US to ameliorate the damage” [1]

Despite the insinuation Assange would provide cover for the false narrative of the DNC mails ‘hack’, Assange’s proposal came to naught. Before the end of 2017 and the final abandonment of this effort, Assange opens another channel, via Dana Rohrabacher, sending a different signal in his bargaining for his freedom game:

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said at the time. “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.

“Julian .. indicated that he is open to further discussions regarding specific information about the DNC email incident that is currently unknown to the public” [2]

Attempting a new direction, shifting away from Trump’s (Assange would appear to believe, not entirely incorrectly) CIA aligned enemies, to what Assange appears to believe are avenue to Trump’s allies, Assange now has attempted to sell the the real deal for his freedom, the fact Seth Rich leaked the DNC mail to Wikileaks. But that didn’t work either.

Skipping forward to 2019, Trump attorney (snake, actually), Rudy Giuliani, attempts to open negotiations with Wikileaks in the public arena:

“”Maybe it will shed light on the plot to create an investigation of President Trump based on a false charge of conspiracy with the Russians to affect the 2016 elections. Keep your eye on Ukraine,” Giuliani said. “It’s possible with all his sources he might know or have information of how it all started.

”Giuliani specified that he was talking about Assange exposing the origins of the federal investigation of possible Trump collusion with Russia and was not raising the possibility of Assange disproving that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

“Giuliani said he believed Assange may be able to “show who invented [the] false story that [Trump] colluded with Russians.”

“Giuliani, a former U.S. attorney and New York City mayor, said he was “not sure yet” if Assange helping exonerate Trump would lighten his possible criminal penalties” [3]

What Giuliani has done in the preceding is, left Assange and Wikileaks a dangle; there is enough ‘wiggle room’ in what Giuliani has proposed for Wikileaks to pin the false ‘hack’ story on the Ukrainians, framing those losers for allegedly having framed Russia, and if Assange doesn’t play ball ‘we will bury you’ (put a cutout of Giuliani’s head on Khrushchev’s body while pounding his shoe on the podium.) This provides manageable cover to the CIA, gives Hillary’s people the ‘now you only look stupid’ graceful exit from the Russia collusion story but the end result might have been to push the House of Representatives over the edge and to go through with impeachment; emphasizing never underestimate the stupidity of your Congressperson. [4]

Now, it is Craig Murray’s present fumbling about, while looking for his misplaced testicles, where this story actually gets interesting. In this respect it should be noted the ‘shadow government’ (corporate board personalities, actually) and its’ minions collectively known as the ‘deep state’ (bought in members of bureaucracy) are not a monolith but a set of competing interests, with spooks at its’ center. Also it should be noted it would not only be Western intelligence agencies would work to penetrate Wikileaks. It follows, Wikileaks having been compromised by the intelligence agencies should demonstrate certain symptoms that may or not indicate the noted competing interests but would certainly be illustrated through inconsistencies such as Wikileaks chief editor Kristinn Hrafnsson’s blatant leaving the door open to the phony Russian ‘hack’ narrative…

At minute 1:10 of the video “It is said […] this is material Russian agents obtained through hacking […] I haven’t seen any evidence substantiating […] the claim [but] it might materialize at some point” [5]

…with a date of March 2019 and certainly inviting Giuliani’s offer to Wikileaks of ‘play our game or we bury Assange’ that cannot be coincidental to this when perfectly timed to Assange’s arrest, Assange is arrested on 11 April, Giuliani’s offer is on 12 April.

But Wikileaks cannot cut a deal and here is why:

C_Murray_blog - 1

“A persistent American lawyer has uncovered the undeniable fact that the FBI has been continuously lying, including giving false testimony in court, in response to Freedom of Information requests for its records on Seth Rich. The FBI has previously given affidavits that it has no records regarding Seth Rich.

“A Freedom of Information request to the FBI which did not mention Seth Rich, but asked for all email correspondence between FBI Head of Counterterrorism Peter Strzok, who headed the investigation into the DNC leaks and Wikileaks, and FBI attorney Lisa Page, has revealed two pages of emails which do not merely mention Seth Rich but have “Seth Rich” as their heading. The emails were provided in, to say the least, heavily redacted form” [6]

This reflects the fact, Murray, who knows full well it was Seth Rich LEAKED the DNC mails, isn’t going to play Giuliani’s ‘Wikileaks can frame the Ukrainians for framing the Russians’ game. In this scenario, Murray, who has never come clean about his knowing it was Seth Rich, not only knows the real story, he also knows if the real story were to become widely acknowledged, his reputation would be toast. [7], [8]

It was Hrafnsson opened the door to Giuliani’s offer on RT (Russia Today), and now Murray, despite (or perhaps because of) his .ru email address (I’d put the full address here but it would open me to ‘doxing’ charges), has now pulled in the opposite direction. Is it the Russians had determined the risks finally outweighed the benefits (cost analysis) has finally shut the door on any ‘deal’ involving Assange? If Assange rots to death in British & American custody, it would be a Russian propaganda boon, the ‘persecuted Assange’ narrative has been a longtime Russian propaganda blessing, milked for all it’s worth, pandering to the many duped Western alternative media stars, no matter the ‘Assange story’ has never stacked up. [9]

Now, we can throw into to the mix of this recipe for ‘cursed stew’, the fact Assange’s high profile lawyers closely tie into Bill Browder of Magnitsky Act fame:

“American journalist Lucy Komisar, who specializes in US finance and tax evasion, denounces the existence of lawyers’ interests that are radically opposed to Julian Assange’s defence criteria. Assange lawyers and their Chambers are both targeted” [10]

What we have here is, plain & simple, Russophobe elements supposedly ‘defending’ Assange. Would any sane spook expect American and British intelligence wouldn’t have their fingers in this aspect of the Wikileaks pie? Well, they’re all trained to lie, so you’ll probably never see an admission.

Now, we’ll spice this sewage soup with a bit of Craig Murray disclaimer:

“I do not know and I deliberately have not inquired what are the views on other subjects of either Mr Ty Clevenger, who brought his evidence and blog to my attention, or Judicial Watch, who made the FOIA request that revealed these documents” [Ibid 6]

Well, that’s convenient, maybe Crag doesn’t want to know for good reasons. In any case, just to inform you all, Judicial Watch is a Trump partisan, right-wing group that notably had unearthed the Defense Intelligence Agency report (with an FOIA request) detailing the Western democracies deliberately creating the circumstance for the rise of Islamic State, enabling Mike Flynn (Trump’s National Security Advisor lynched by Mueller’s Russiagate FBI mob with a bit of help from Mike Pence, remember Flynn?) to spill his guts on the matter to Mehdi Hasan at Al Jazeera:

“”declared or undeclared Salafist” – it’s not secret any more, it was released under FOI. The quote is: “There is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want in order to isolate the Syrian regime.”” [11]

Murray’s source, Judicial Watch, is a pro-Trump deep state faction’s documents outlet opposed to the Never Trump Republican deep state faction that presently surrounds Trump, particularly noting the president’s lead hostage-takers, Pompeo & Pence (who took over from Trump’s previous jailers Kelly & Mattis.)

Craig Murray was just handed documents to back up what he already knows and opportunity he needed to stand up and blow the whistle and he couldn’t bring himself to do it.

All of this as Trump’s guilt or innocence vote in the Senate has been delayed to the day following his 2020 State of the Union speech. Will we see a deranged Trump lashing out from his captivity or a properly humbled, tail between his legs, Evangelicals’ prisoner Trump? On Wednesday morning, will the Senate wake up prepared to convict after all?

Who will write Trump’s speech? Will Trump stay on script?

Relevant to this, will Craig Murray, who full well knows the facts, find his misplaced testicles and plainly state the assassinated Seth Rich was the Wikileaks DNC mails source, kicking Pence and Pelosi (both) in the crotch by laying Russiagate out in the open as a false, combined neoliberal/neocon ‘Never Trump’ intelligence agency concoction?

Don’t count on it, if he was going to do it, Murray would more than merely allude to the concealed facts. This was Murray’s big chance and he blew it. As it is sometimes said in the Rocky Mountains ‘The British are a “sorry” race of people.’

“I knew Seth Rich. I know he was the Wikileaks source. I was involved

“If Congress includes #SethRich case into their Russia probe I’ll give written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was Wikileaks source” -Kim Dotcom [12]

 

1 https://archive.li/VGvJl

2 https://archive.li/LVv1f

3 https://archive.li/aoPGE

4 https://archive.li/QTEGn

5 https://archive.li/MZCG0

6 https://archive.li/EA2VO

7 https://archive.li/aSuT6

8 https://archive.li/Z7ofI

9 https://archive.li/VPFcT

10 https://archive.li/jDXwc

11 https://archive.li/pRcH7

12 https://archive.li/aNLE3https://archive.li/XETvC

 

 

 

 

Suleimani - 1

Was Soleimani an enemy of Americans? Without question, this was the case. But who created him? How did Soleimani become an enemy of the USA? Plain and simple, American policy is squarely to blame.

In short, it was 1953 when the CIA overthrew the democratic government of Iran and converted Shah Reza Pahlavi into an absolute monarch who promptly morphed into a brutal dictator infamous for the widespread torture & executions of his own people. The Shah’s new secret police (created in 1956), SAVAK, trained in kidnapping, torture and disappearing people by CIA, MI6 & MOSSAD, crudely propped up this iteration of Iranian ‘governance’ with domestic state terror to 1979.

By this time, Iranian people across widely divergent political paths had been long united in determination to be rid of both; the Shah and the foreign influence that had propped up his murderous rule for 25 years, leading to capture of the USA embassy by the Iranian student movement.

As it happens, the dust settled after the revolution of 1979 and it was the conservative ayatollahs came out on top and a theocratic republic had been established in Iran. Since, this Islamic republic has zealously refused the influence of the USA and Israel’s regional hegemony (Britain had faded from this equation as a major player but that could change.)

Who could blame the Iranians? There has been nothing short of ongoing decades hostility directed at Iran, resulting in an Iranian patriotism devoted to a sincere antipathy to Zionism, whether that of Israel’s “Yinon Plan” or the necrotic-apocalyptic Christian Zionism of the USA that is backing habitual Israeli regional-geopolitical misdemeanors; up to and inclusive of USA support for Israeli assassination of Iranian scientists in recent times, generating support for the ayatollahs across Iranian society.

Soleimani was brilliant at undermining USA/Israeli interests in Syria, Lebanon & Iraq. There is little doubt his efforts have helped the Houthis versus the Saudis in Yemen. He was also key in organizing the main effort which led to defeating the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (it were never a black & white world.) No doubt he would have seen Iran’s enemy al-Qaida (and its’ spinoff Islamic State) as a USA production and not without reason; al-Qaida was born out of the USA arming the Mujahideen against the Soviets in 1980s Afghanistan. This all goes to the Iranian understanding (context) of American-Israeli duplicity when the Americans and Israelis were arming both sides in the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s (Iran-Contra) so both parties might better tear themselves to pieces.

Iran has little reason to be grateful to the USA in both; practical and historical terms. From an Iranian national point of view, Iran has every reason to be more than suspicious of any regional acts of the Americans, in practical terms creating perception leading to policy where Iranian national self preservation demands a hostile demeanor towards the USA.

Will the assassination of Suleimani change any of this? In terms of Iranian policy, no, it only reinforces the preceding. In terms of brilliance applied by the Iranians towards their perceived enemies, it could go either way; removing Suleimani might open to lesser or greater minds taking up his assigned duties. In terms of practical application of violence, likely yes, the Americans just opened themselves to the assassination of their own in what should have been off-limits territories: the international airports of this world. This last is consistent with the (as old as Rome) rule of reciprocity in the international common law. This was an overt act of war.

The assassination of Qassem Alì Soleimani was a tremendous blunder that is entirely at odds with Trump’s protestations he does not want war with Iran. But the assassination is entirely consistent with the apocalyptic (Fellowship) cult behind Mike Pence and the leadership at the Pentagon.

I’m no fan of Iran’s ayatollahs but there should be a genuflection to the facts: American policies create America’s enemies and Iran is no exception, rather this act is example of the American empire’s hubris.

 

2019 had been unremarkable for the fact of pervasive political lying continues to unfold as though there could never be any ‘awakening’ (nothing changes.) The CIA initiated Mueller ‘special counsel’ caper pits one set of liars off another set of liars as though truth were anti-evolutionary in the American political construct. The sad fact is, that’s the truth of the matter; political lies have been part and parcel of the American social construct since the beginning, recalling Thomas Paine:

“It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind, as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime”

Try as one might, there is no better description of Congress on either side of the aisle to be found by this reporter in Congress’ ongoing provocations of Russia. Congress is the abscess at the center of the infection, it matters not where the infection began; it is the Congress appropriates the money applied to the insanity of it all. Whether the information operations (PsyOps) demonizing Russia, the intelligence agencies related lying through their teeth about the disposition of certain events having to do with USA elections, or the Pentagon painting a dire picture of an ‘aggressive Russia’ requiring historic outlay of money (even as the USA military muppet NATO has marched itself to Russia’s borders, deploys permanent bases and engages in offensive war games), and, of course, military industrial lobbyists providing what can only be described as a kickback when one recalls it is prior appropriations is the source of the money that corporations return to Congress. In other words, prior contracts awarded on a profit basis are what enable corporations to send lobbyists to convince future Pentagon contracts should be awarded in what amounts to a ‘wine & dine’ feeding frenzy of cannibal maggots [1]

2018_lobbyist_$ - 1

Congress appropriates, Pentagon awards, corporate profits fund lobbyists in endless cycle. What is remarkable is how cheaply our congressmen are bought; considering the outlay in lobbyist money compared to the amount of maggot infested ‘bacon’ returned:

“Major components of the NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act] were a $635 billion allocation for Department of Defense and Department of Energy national security programs, $71.5 billion for overseas contingency operations (OCO, or fighting in foreign wars) and $5.3 billion to repair damage caused by extreme weather and natural disasters. The Defense Department’s full fiscal year 2020 budget totals $738 billion, an increase of $22 billion ($3.1%) year over year” [2]

Creating boogeymen is essential to keep this cycle alive. In this case, the NDAA also pumping 300 million for Ukraine’s military into this following legacy that had finally devolved to alliance with the Nazi’s in WWII (Stephan Bandera’s SS Galician Nazi army division) eventually leading to these same Nazis taking control of Ukraine in 2014 is not going to be appreciated by the Russians:

“The aim of the Austrian [Austro-Hungarian Empire’s] policy was to forever sever the internal ties between the Rusyn elite and the common Russian culture. For this purpose, for more than half a century considerable funds from the State budget were constantly allocated for printing publications preaching hatred towards Russia and artificially created Ukrainian nationalism. Not only national teachers, but also all the representatives of the intellectuals who were in direct contact with the population: doctors, agronomists, veterinarians, and others, were taught in the anti-Russian spirit using State grants.

“The refusal of the Russian self-identification became an obligatory condition for acceptance for public service, which also included educational institutions of all levels – from elementary schools to universities. And the fight against “Moscowphiles” was set as the main task for all the numerous Austrian State apparatus in Galicia” [today’s Western Ukraine] [3], [4]

And so it is, the USA Congress’ NDAA for 2020 includes pumping 300 million into exploiting a 200 years ongoing effort of Western empire, over several incarnations, to create instability, hostility and Russophobe enemies within Russia’s Western border regions, through the purposeful alienation of what had been Russia’s common cultural entities, and this is construed to be “countering Russian aggression.”

This incredible deceit or ‘subscribing professional belief to things he does not believe’ must, of course, be attended by information operations constituting what is in fact a manifestation of ‘the commission of every other crime.”

In this regard we enter 2020 with the ‘impeachment’ drama manifesting liars in every direction one looks, there is no single clean avenue to be found, whether in America’s Democrats, Republicans, mainstream or alternative media, the related EU & NATO nations’ political and information organs or ‘adversarial’ Russia itself. Of the more lying circumstance than this writer cares to note here, one circumstance is selected to illustrate an aggregate deceit of monstrous proportion, the impeachment relationship to the Russian ‘hack’ of the 2016 election.

 “who was at worst a Russian spy and at best a Russian stooge” ? [5]

As things turn out (in what can only be a damage control scramble), Carter Page was actually a CIA asset framed by an FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, when the FBI’s ‘Russiagate’ star chamber applied for FISA Court rubber stamp on a secret spying warrant. IF one CAN believe that, on its’ face it would seem the FBI screwed a CIA attempt to use the Trump campaign to penetrate the Kremlin, the complete reverse of Russians using the Trump campaign’s ‘collusion’ to penetrate the USA political establishment. Oh my.

It was only two short years previous, ‘Shifty Schiff’ (based on the so-called ‘Steele Dossier’) had demanded to know whether Page had met with “Kremlin linked professor” Joseph Mifsud and that’s where things get interesting. [6]

Joseph Mifsud’s lawyer has stated Misfud “was being directed, had long worked for Western intelligence, that he was being directed specifically, that he was asked to connect George Papadopoulos to Russia, meaning it was an operation, some form of an intelligence operation. That was his lawyer’s own words for this. If that’s the case, it means the flashpoint for starting this whole investigation was in fact manufactured from the beginning” [7]

The choice of words “western intelligence” is a little ambiguous but considering the ‘Steele Dossier’ had been ‘made in UK’, moving just a bit further on, it is clearly Her Majesty’s boogers are to be found in this recipe of ‘spook soup.’

“Over the last few months, Professor Joseph Mifsud has become a feather in the cap for those pushing the Trump-Russia narrative. He is characterized as a “Russian” intelligence asset in mainstream press, despite his declarations to the contrary. However, evidence has surfaced that suggests Mifsud was anything but a Russian spy, and may have actually worked for British intelligence. This new evidence culminates in the ground-breaking conclusion that the UK and its intelligence apparatus may be responsible for the invention of key pillars of the Trump-Russia scandal” [8]

So, we have  a second one hundred eighty degrees reversal, following on Carter Page had been a CIA (not Russian) asset, now we discover “Kremlin linked professor” Joseph Mifsud, more likely than not, worked for the British intelligence services. I mean, man, what’s to do with that?

Well, any half competent investigator should be able to hit a home run, batting right handed, over the left field fence, with what comes next.

The entire butt-load of lies the ‘Russiagate’ rests on, pivots on the accusation it was Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and this is presumed to be the material Mifsud alluded to when he informed George Papadopoulos the Russians had dirt on the Clinton campaign. Papadopoulos repeated this to an Australian ambassador, and in what appears to have been a set-up, the ambassador trotted the information to American authorities and all of this supposedly buttressed the out & out fake “Steele Dossier” that should have sunk the Trump campaign for POTUS. But it not only didn’t work, but because it didn’t work, it can’t be made to go away. That aspect is kindergarten forensic science.

What appears may have happened is, would be something like this: the deep state Clintonista faction backing Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan didn’t have the pull needed within his own (historically arch-conservative) agency to pull off the hit job on Trump’s campaign on behalf of the neoliberals so Brennan enlisted the British in what became a cellularized-hybrid operation (British intel x Brennan’s neoliberal cell.) Meanwhile (the promptly assassinated) Seth Rich had taken the DNC mails out of that organization’s server on a memory stick and sold the material to WikiLeaks (likely ‘facilitated’ by MOSSAD, Trump/Pence has been an Israeli wet dream.) [9]

Alerted to the DNC mails heist, subsequently, the ‘Russian Hack’ had been concocted by the neoliberals in British intelligence and handed to the Clintonistas at the FBI who colluded with CrowdStrike in the invention of Guccifer 2.0 but this story is too hot to let out of the bag because if it breaks open, the collateral damage would not only be widely geopolitical but could possibly result in a very few lonely lampposts in DC, the entire congress has been in the business of promoting this lie. And that is almost certainly why the pivotal but vanished Joseph Mifsud had to be made to ‘go away’ as a witness. [10]

Now, take a deep breath and consider this next: William Barr is a longtime CIA asset who’d actually worked for the agency in his early career and is notable for two events in his first stint as Attorney General (for career CIA operative George H.W. Bush), working to contain the Iran Contra debacle (inclusive of recommending pardons for Poindexter et al) but more importantly, crushing (includes assassination) investigation into the ‘Boys Town’ pedophilia scandal that led directly to the White House. This second instance no longer seems a far-fetched accusation in light of the recent Jeffery Epstein ‘expiration.’ [11], [12]

Bush41-call-boys

It follows, not only is long time CIA asset William Barr (damage control expert) engaged in ‘re-misdirecting’ the entire false narrative, Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s big mouth indicates this ‘re-misdirection’ is intended to frame the Ukrainians for framing the Russians on behalf of Brennan; in place of what had actually been a framing of the Russians by Brennan’s neoliberal faction in concert with British intelligence. This recent angle includes blackmailing Wikileaks into supporting the new false narrative, Wikileaks plays ball or Assange is buried. As well, the British would be badly burned if the actuality were known and no one knows where and how it all morphs from the end of 2019; in the warring factions contest. That’s the world of spooks. [13], [14]

So, what’s up with the Russian end in all of this? They probably don’t know what to do. As geopolitically unstable the entire business is, unwinding it, engineering the ‘Russiagate’ facts into the open, would be even more destabilizing. Then, there is a complicating factor where Russian propaganda has become deeply invested in creating a mythology of ‘Assange the crucified truth-teller’ when ‘flipping’ the Western propaganda narrative back onto itself. [15], [16]

Likely the Russians would be ok with ‘re-framing’ the false narrative onto the Nazis in Ukraine and the conservative faction at CIA recognizes (perhaps has even been communicated) this. That ‘truth telling’ Wikileaks has never openly acknowledged the facts surrounding Seth Rich would seem to play to what should be Russian concerns (and brings into question Wikileaks associate Craig Murray’s .ru email address, I’d put the full address here but that’d be opening to a ‘doxing’ accusation.) [17]

Moving on, a rare truth from a spook who essentially admits the near invincibility of the intelligence agencies’ reputations is so much myth:

“If the Mossad had to pay fines for operations it carried out over the years that failed, the state treasury would collapse” [18], [19]

Moving to conclude ronaldthomaswest.com’s 2019 end of year message and notes, just a short paragraph on stats, following on the 2018 end of year message and blog performance. As is the case each year, it is noted ‘who’ is reading is more important, by far, than raw numbers. 2019 is lower in overall numbers but not by much, a drop of about 5,000 hits or 2018’s rounded off 42,500 to 2019’s projected 37,500. There was a noticeable drop in the fall of 2019, when I’d turned my attention to a Native American project or translating pre-Columbian thought to modern (with attending few months sabbatical from geopolitics.) As predicted at the end of 2018, in 2019 a lampoon of CIA torture – Alfreda Bikowsky & The Definition of Stupid – showing (in a case with indisputable statistics) information derived from torture is actually worse than useless, became this blog’s all time most read piece, receiving multiple hits nearly every day after five full years.

To Gina Haspel’s behind the scenes in Langley, Virginia, that’s all folks!

 

1 https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?cycle=2018&ind=K02

2 https://www.marketwatch.com/story/after-a-strong-2019-are-there-any-undervalued-defense-contractors-2019-12-21

3 https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/12/10/740bln-us-defense-bill-targets-russian-pipelines-a68539

4 https://www.stalkerzone.org/how-austria-created-ukrainians-from-the-rusyns-of-galicia/

5 https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474570-an-apology-to-carter-page

6 https://www.businessinsider.com/carter-page-congressional-testimony-transcript-steele-dossier-2017-11?r=US&IR=T

7 The Hill journalist John Solomon’s quote, begin listening at minute 2:10 of the embedded video https://canadafreepress.com/article/attorney-for-joseph-mifsud-confirms-hes-a-western-intelligence-operative-no

8 https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/

9 https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2018/01/31/the-wheel-is-indeed-empty/

10 https://www.insideover.com/politics/80-sure-that-mifsud-is-dead-what-has-become-of-the-russiagate-professor.html

11 Suppressed Discovery Channel documentary ‘Conspiracy of Silence’ on the White House connected pedophilia scandal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AY-F5JoHoho

12 External links collection to Whitney Webb’s Mint Press News series on the Epstein linked intelligence agencies’ blackmail operations: https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2019/08/09/the-epstein-chronicles/

13 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/giuliani-assange-could-expose-that-ukraine-was-behind-false-russia-collusion-charges

14 https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2019/04/13/rudolph-the-snake-giuliani-opens-negotiations-with-wikileaks/

15 https://sputniknews.com/columnists/201909241076880259-assange-destroyed-for-truth-telling/

16 https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/01/08/agent-assange/

17 https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2017/09/16/incompetent-espionage-wikileaks-iii/

18 https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201912221077718353-how-mossads-attempt-to-smuggle-jews-out-of-ethiopia-ended-in-rape-torture-and-imprisonment/

19 https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/04/death-of-a-mossad-agent/

 

%d bloggers like this: