Archives for category: assassinations


Tales of a 1984 Journey to India

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 1 From Indian country to India

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 2 New Delhi, round one

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 3 On character

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 4 Into the Himalayan foothills

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 5 Sanarth & the Buddha

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 6 Varanasi part one

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 7 Varanasi part two

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 8 Varanasi part three

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 9 Katmandu

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 10 Trisuli River

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 11 Chitwan National Park

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 12 Katmandu reprise

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 13 Back to Hotel Imperial

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 14 The riots begin

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 15 To the Taj Palace Hotel

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 16 Out of Delhi!

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 17 Cairo-London-New York

My Madcap Adventure, Episode 18 Aftermath

My Madcap Adventure, Epilogue (Notes) corrections/disclaimers

“The idea of becoming “NSA-proof” is just silly. If they want it, they can get it” Joseph Lorenzo Hall

“I’m going to slip up and they’re going to hack me. It’s going to happen” Edward Snowden

All the encryption in the world isn’t going to protect, example given, a computer with a NSA, GCHQ, Unit 8200 or other intelligence agency’s undetectable keylog trojan, trust me. But first, a bit of my story and then onto how (not, actually) to leak:

When I’d exited the U.S. Army in April, 1976, I held a top secret clearance. The only documents I had taken with me were a complete record of my military 201 file. I also had (since) acquired copies of my veterans and social security files. How I’d managed copies of these are a secret, along the lines of Benjamin Franklin’s ‘three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.’ In this regard, it is worth mentioning I have held information between my ears that has never been spoken of in presence of mobile device, let alone entered into a computer or sent via any email.

Ok, so I can tell how I acquired the social security file, the social security administration fucked up and mailed me my own file. Yes, the original, which I went through with what certain people might have assumed would be great satisfaction, as supposedly I realized I was the censor who’d decide what I could see in my file. Of course I redacted or with-held nothing in my self exam, prior to sending the file on to my attorney who notified the social security administration we were (supposedly) inadvertently in possession of the file and to who should we send it to? A lady at the administration, in subsequent conversation, commented to myself something along the lines of ‘NO ONE has had the access to their file that you have had…’

But in fact this social security business was patent bs. Almost certainly the file had been deliberately sent my way, stripped of certain records (they missed pulling one critical document pointing to this), to throw me off the trail of then senators Max Baucus and Conrad Burns who both were complicit in covering up crimes at United States Forest Service offices in Montana on environmental issues, and suspects in regards to my file having been sequestered for months at the Social Security offices in Maryland while it was investigated whether I could be charged with fraud. Why? The USA appears to have left no stone unturned in efforts to take myself out of the public circulation due to my anti-corruption work of that era (1990s.) Apart from this, it was about this time I’d produced copies of records from my VA (military veteran) file after certain originals had gone missing following an ‘expert’ sent from Washington to Helena (Montana, where my VA file was kept) to ‘review’ files, kept me from charges of fraud relating to my veteran’s disability pension.

This (failed) ‘deep state’ caper in regards to attempt at trumping up felony charges intended to send me to jail and end my work, follows typical false flag spy-craft model. The people hearing the case, had it been successfully pursued, would have been innocents looking at a record they could not know (or believe) had been tampered with, to secure a conviction. My having copies of my VA file documents, saved my butt. I produced the necessary copy of a critical document at the initial hearing and the case was dismissed on the spot.

It wasn’t until I’d dug into the USA’s funding of charter schools as cover for intelligence embeds, the agencies had begun playing hardball or, that is to say, devoted resources to taking me out physically (assassination.)

Prior to this, during my stint with Special Forces, I’d the best possible education in operations and intelligence because it was not school, but OJT (on-the-job-training) with veterans of operations coordinated with CIA in Indochina and Central America. This was the best (or worst, depending on one’s perspective) avenue to knowledge in the ‘game’ of international intrigue; it was unrestricted, first hand knowledge of the dirty aspect of the business on the ground, where the intrigues hatched by criminal minds at Langley, Virginia, are played out.  Suffice it to say, I departed Special Forces with a remarkable understanding of how underhanded the game of spies is played, the paramount importance of employing psychology to one’s advantage (in often devious ways), and the imperative necessity of the death of one’s conscience to be successful and survive. Having only learned about, not employed these nefarious skills, I took my conscience and ethics, intact, with me on departure, together with the remarkable tool kit I’d developed through this experience, in subsequent work as investigator. My favorite of these skills had been open source analysis, in fact in light of the avalanche of criticisms since the Snowden revelations, it has been pointed out CIA open source analysis has been more effective, by far, than any NSA program, in relation to spy-craft.

Now, applying old school spy-craft, to the point of this essay; how NOT to leak-

Since WikiLeaks had been locked out of its own leak platform we’ve had ‘OpenLeaks‘ (a flop) and since we’ve had the deceptive & falsely named, pandering to fools, so-called ‘SecureDrop‘ (remember Reality Winner?)

However ‘SecureDrop’ might have been well intended, I wouldn’t touch it with the proverbial ten-foot pole. What’s more is, I doubt you’d even need it, if you wished to leak. I’ll go into the why you wouldn’t need it first, and then why I wouldn’t touch it.

If you wished to have a secure platform to leak documented criminal activities from, as opposed to a supposedly ‘secure’ online platform to leak to, you should be able to build one yourself. And you shouldn’t need to be a computer guru to do it. The recipe is exceedingly simple:

Acquire a laptop that cannot be traced to you, from a yard sale in an unfamiliar neighborhood, example given. Park your car away from where you make the purchase. I don’t advise stealing a machine, but that’d work if you’re a competent thief and don’t leave a trail. We know the NSA has arranged to implant computers with bugged software, actual hardware in some cases, and we want a computer that it doesn’t matter if it ‘calls home’ (NSA) when certain red flags might be triggered by materials you might be handling, so onto the next paragraph.

Now, before you even fire the machine up for the first time, you kill the web-cam, a piece of paper taped over it will do just fine. And you disable the microphone and speaker with dummy jacks cut from discarded actual microphones and speakers and epoxy them in place, just to make certain they stay there. Carefully cut them off where the plug extends from the jack, so they are not obvious. Now your ‘leak platform’ is externally blind, deaf and dumb. Shut off bluetooth and search the machine for any GPS integrated software programs and disable them prior to logging on to the internet. DO NOT log into internet from your home.

Now, as to what you might be leaking, consider whether it will be tracked to you on the back-end (source.) Be assured in some environments there will be efforts to do certain things, like identify a computer that had items downloaded onto a memory stick. How will you get these materials safely into the machine you intend to leak from? Old fashioned spy-craft is something to consider, if you do not feel secure in the environment whose security you are breaching. Digital photos of actual documents can be loaded into the computer or paper documents can be scanned into your ‘leak platform’ (in which case you will want an older, untraceable scanner as well.) Use a digital camera that cannot be traced to you. You NEVER want to mail by post any documents, because certain addresses will be flagged by intelligence agencies and your package could be intercepted and might give up fingerprints and/or DNA and other information, such as a the postmark information needed to review security footage at specific locations on certain dates. Also, you’ll want clean paper documents for a scanner (particularly) or digital camera, on account of the possibility you might inadvertently scan your own or your colleagues fingerprints (use gloves when working with any paper documents.)

Ask yourself, is the material you are considering making public, of a demonstrable criminal nature? Or, does it shock the conscience in a sense of egregious violating principles of ethics? COVER YOUR ASS, BECAUSE NO MATTER THE PRECAUTIONS TAKEN, YOU MIGHT GET CAUGHT. Public opinion might save your butt, but don’t count on it, it hasn’t worked for many (if any in recent times.)

Remind yourself, there has been a dearth of leakers that have gone undetected. Has it ever crossed your mind why there has been no ‘deep throat‘ in our present era, and why it seems nearly everyone gets busted? As well, our Federalist Society majority on the USA’s ‘deep state’ owned (corporate board controlled) Supreme Court refused first amendment free press protection to journalism in the case of James Risen in a leaks case. They’ll be after you with everything at the system’s disposal and your chances are not good if you are detected at any level.

Now, you’ve decided, as a patriot, your leak is worth your liberty and/or life and you’ve convinced yourself you’ve stolen the material you wish  to leak without getting caught (let’s hope you’re right) and it’s time to deliver to the journalists, undetected. Perhaps you’d wish to wait three or six months, after you’ve gotten away with the initial theft, it’d be nice if the trail grows cold. Now, your documents are loaded into file that is easy to access, for instance located on the desktop. The email addresses you wish to send the information to are handy. Now, your platform, ‘Dr Leakey’ (named for the archaeologist), is ready. You are in familiar turf (if you are confident), or you have traveled to unfamiliar territory (if you have nerves of steel.) What you need is an open wireless signal you can log onto. When you’ve found this at a cafe or a truckstop or simply a careless person in any neighborhood with unlocked wireless where you can log in from, sitting in your car parked close by (beware of cctv), log on. Create a faked email account (that you will never use again.) Send a first mail (BCC to recipients) to yourself, explaining there is a second mail following with attachments and stating if the recipient does not see the second mail, to look in their spam folder. This mail should pop up and you see it with no failed addresses (from the BCC to the people you are mailing.) Seeing you have a working address on both ends (i.e. functioning mail accounts) and are you still determined to do this, ask yourself, for real? Deep breath, new mail addressed, attached file(s), hit send, have coffee, read the paper, look at ease, normal, belonging in your environment while the what might seem like ages in time pass as the file uploads from the computer and finally the mail goes ‘whoosh’ (in your mind) and the leak is done.

Calmly go on about your day and know how you will be disposing of Dr Leakey. You used him for this one project and will never use him again. Example given, pull out the ram, hard drive goes to the incinerator (an all night campfire will do), break the screen as though Dr Leakey had been accidentally dropped & parts salvaged, and the carcass destination ends in a dumpster (leave no fingerprints.) Same fate for either the digital camera or scanner, if you used these. Be patient for results in the news. You’ve just dropped a bomb from the unseen world and any journalist worth your while, will take time to try and authenticate the information you’ve provided. If they blow it off and never pursue the lead, maybe the gods actually love you. If you’ve gotten away with it, resist temptation to ever do it again. There might be such thing as a charmed life, but it’s probably not yours.

By now, the NSA with its billions of mails to look through, will come up with (at most) someone sent a mail from an account used ONCE, from an computer they never see log in again, over some unsecured random wireless signal in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, example given. Maybe you live in this area of 13 million people or maybe you don’t. This is because you left little in the way of digital fingerprints by finding a way around taking your leak out on a memory stick. Enjoy a quiet laugh and hope you were good enough getting the material out the back-end, with a cold or faint trail, because if you did it right,  they can’t track you from that end. And then erase your personal memory, the one between your ears, because you never wish to tell ANYONE, who you are, in relation to what you’ve done. Meanwhile, study technique along the lines set out by a former FBI agent in the article ‘Spy Craft for Hacks‘ but even there the deck is stacked against you with an ‘agency friendly’, very serious lie by omission; don’t ever have your cell phone (or any mobile device) along on what would then become a misadventure. You’ll need cold nerves, excellent understanding of the environment and good luck, to pull it off. Nothing suffices for this like training and even then, there is no absolute way of doing these things undetected. Luck and competence on your own part and that of your adversaries play into this as well.

Now, to why you probably don’t actually want or need to leak. Firstly, we know it is no longer a conspiracy ‘theory’ (rather conspiracy fact) the USA’s security state is behaving like nazis in relation to surveillance of its own people. We know it’s likely the corporate ‘deep state’ co-opted congress, president and courts are doing little and will do little or nothing to actually change this behavior of the MILITARY elements in control of the runaway NSA, other than at most, wring their hands for public consumption. You don’t need much more knowledge to effect change, if change is going to happen. And if change isn’t happening, what’s the point? If our society’s leading lights are merely content (at most) to shout and stamp their feet like spoiled children at what is going on, rather than shut down ‘business as usual’ along the lines of refusing this criminal hydra legitimacy and attending power, and you don’t see the tectonic plate shift in public outrage necessary to force the issue, there really is no point, people have been cowed into obedience along the lines predicted by both Orwell & Huxley. On the one hand you have Orwell’s conservative sheep bleating on behalf of the ‘security’ state over the terror propaganda all of our western world has been fed. On the other hand you have Huxley’s ‘it’s all about me’ MTV generation could care less about civil liberties beyond freedom to consume, extreme sport, sex, fashion and media ego. With corporate media feeding a public with an education one mile wide and one quarter inch deep (1.6 kilometers wide & 1/2 centimeter deep), the Billy Grahams and Hollywood (our two primary oracles of ‘god’) rule a society which has cannot be saved from itself, because you cannot get the majority’s attention long enough to explain a few sensible things that might change their focus, if not their beliefs, whether puritan or hedonistic. This reflects social engineering via media information operations.

Stepping into/out of this world in relation to spies and leaking is a very dangerous proposition for the untrained. Now is time to work with what we know, not obsess with pursing endless soap operas concerning information on criminals you exercise no real control over. And there is a reason intelligence will want you obsessing (keep reading.)

What can be clearly inferred from open source analysis is, our civil structures have become criminal, out of control, one could go so far as to simply state ‘insane.’ And this is what is distracted from, when obsessed with being outraged at the western democracies ‘voyeurism’ in relation to ‘the people’ who supposedly are in control of our future direction via the principle of ‘consent of the governed.’ The propagandists at the several corporate board controlled intelligence agencies, via co-opted western media, will work to guide and exploit this national tantrum to a (hopefully) calmed down child at the end of the day.

As to the ongoing criminal agendas, one only need look at Chevron (example given) as a corporate gangster poster child and how they’ve managed to buy congress and the courts via Federalist Society owned justices at the top, along the lines of ‘citizens united.’ As for the out of control, one only need look at how ineffective congressional oversight has been, and is presently, in regards to NSA, example given, and there is no change in sight. As for the insane, one only need look at the USA, and it’s lapdog western democracies, pushing Russia to the brink with geo-political capers recently best illustrated in Ukraine, and how western media lies to the public about what is actually going on. Left unchecked, this insanity will certainly lead to VERY BAD subsequent events.

Now, to alternative media and the so-called ‘progressive’ movement, here’s why I wouldn’t touch any online platform, despite examples such as the ‘indomitable’ Guardian subscribe to ‘SecureDrop.’

To begin with, directing leaks to electronics communications platforms is playing to the NSA’s strong point, this area of expertise is SIGINT (signals intelligence), the NSA forte. No matter the encryption expertise involved in any platform’s construction, it is an invitation to play in the lion’s den. Be assured, the NSA (not to mention GCHQ and other intelligence agencies) will assign crack teams to SecureDrop (if ‘securedrop’ were not actually designed by these.)

The Guardian (newspaper) is an organization that would be very deliberately targeted by HUMINT (human intelligence) as a matter of fact. Organizations wishing to penetrate, spy, shape dialogue & policy within the Guardian would include MOSSAD, CIA, DGSE (France) and the British intelligence agencies. Each of these agencies will have a vested interest in covert penetration of the Guardian on account of that paper not having been (yet) entirely monopolized by any one of the Western intelligence agencies (which squabble & compete among themselves.) Anything, were it sent through the pretense of a so-called secure system, is at risk of exposure to clandestine a rabbit warren designed by spies within the Guardian organization. Trust me, they’re there. MOSSAD particularly, would be interested in any information it could potentially acquire, as ‘chits’ to trade to the USA (and other nations) for political favors, as its political currency continues in steady decline over West Bank issues. Just because you possibly managed a ‘secure’ leak (in your dreams) over the SecureDrop system, does not mean you are secure, not by a long shot, because you cannot know how the material might be compromised after it has been put through, let alone whether the system itself is penetrated/designed to identify the source point of the upload and MOSSAD trades YOU in a quid pro quo with another agency.

And now to the odious (closing) aspect of this essay.

“You can imagine my surprise when I read the June 13, 1971, issue of the Sunday New York Times and saw there among the “Pentagon Papers” a number of basic information papers that had been in my own files in the Joint Chiefs of Staff area of the Pentagon. Most of the papers of that period had been source documents from which I had prepared dozens — even hundreds — of briefings, for all kinds of projects, to be given to top Pentagon officers. Not only had many of those papers been in my files, but I had either written many of them myself or had written certain of the source documents used by the men who did.

“Many people have been so concerned about what has been happening to our Government that they have dedicated themselves to investigating and exposing its evils. Unfortunately, a number of these writers have been dupes of those cleverer than they or with sinister reasons for concealing knowledge. They have written what they thought was the truth, only to find out (if they ever did find out) that they had been fed a lot of contrived cover stories and just plain hogwash

“In the hands of Allen Dulles, “secrecy” was simply a chameleon device to be used as he saw fit and to be applied to lesser men according to his schemes. It is quite fantastic to find people like Daniel Ellsberg being charged with leaking official secrets simply because the label on the piece of paper said “TOP SECRET,” when the substance of many of the words written on those same papers was patently untrue and no more than a cover story. Except for the fact that they were official “lies”, these papers had no basis in fact, and therefore no basis to be graded TOP SECRET or any other degree of classification

“Any reader of the “Pentagon Papers” should be warned that although they were commissioned on June 17, 1967, by the Secretary of Defense as “the history of United States involvement in Vietnam from World War II [Sept 2, 1945] to the present” [1968], they are unreliable, inaccurate and marred by serious omissions. They are a contrived history, at best, even though they were written by a selected Task Force under Pentagon leadership” -Pentagon liaison to the CIA, L. Fletcher Prouty

In fact the so-called ‘Pentagon Papers’ were intended to deflect attention from the CIA and onto the military, concerning policy failures in Vietnam.

Open source analysis profiles (STRONGLY) Daniel Ellsberg as an intelligence agency officer, almost certainly CIA. What the CIA edits at wikipedia doesn’t inform of, when the public is fed

“Ellsberg served in the Pentagon from August 1964 under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (and, in fact, was on duty on the evening of the Gulf of Tonkin incident, reporting the incident to McNamara). He then served for two years in Vietnam working for General Edward Lansdale as a civilian in the State Department”

…is Ellsberg’s work for Edward Lansdale at Department of State has CIA information operations written all over it. One of CIA’s big tasks is information operations or social engineering via psychological manipulation of entire populations. And Ellsberg was working with one of the CIA’s true big shots in this area of intelligence expertise. The ultimate purpose of the ‘Pentagon Papers’ leak was information operations (social engineering) to shield the CIA from public accountability for the massive intelligence & related policy failures in Vietnam; by shifting public focus onto the Pentagon. The CIA was expendable and could have been disbanded. The Pentagon could not be done away with.

“That I had written parts of some of them proves that they were not genuine Pentagon papers, because my work at that time was devoted to support of the CIA” -L Fletcher Prouty

Colonel Prouty blew the whistle on the CIA & Ellsberg over 40 years ago. Colonel Prouty’s work, which has borne the test of time, is buried, meanwhile, whistle-blower ‘legend’ Ellsberg invites leakers into the SecureDrop cobra’s lair… as you actually believe the initial SecureDrop developer, Aaron Schwartz, hanged himself (and his co-developer’ ‘died’ after that.) Probably, it’s a case of, examples given, Gary Webb shot himself in the head TWICE (Superman could do that.) It’s an old model, for instance when Eli Black had stepped into longtime CIA turf at United Fruit, he was framed with an SEC investigation and a subsequently ‘depressed’ Eli broke an industrial strength skyscraper window with his briefcase and ‘jumped’ 44 floors from his office building. No-no, the CIA liaised generals at NSA won’t be allowing certain activities to move forward unimpeded. The only question with ‘SecureDrop’ is, how it has been compromised (since inception or when the source code was stolen, likely about the time Schwartz ‘hanged’ himself.)

Daniel Ellsberg has been a champion of WikiLeaks which has employed SecureDrop via tor (tor is a USA military intelligence tool.)

Ellsberg has promoted SecureDrop for

Has it ever occurred to anyone, as to why, no one has ever outed a ‘Kim Philby‘ type character embedded in the progressive and peace movements, as though intelligence operatives would never caper within that playground? I’ll name you one. Daniel Ellsberg.

“From the beginning, the Pentagon Papers were a compilation of documents designed to paint President John F. Kennedy as the villain of the story, and to shield the role of the CIA” L Fletcher Prouty

Meanwhile, so-called ‘SecureDrop’ has been leaking the leakers identities for years.


This is a majorly rewritten, updated & re-titled piece from 2014 –


related at this site:

Pentagon Papers, CIA and the Lies of Daniel Ellsberg

The Smelly Side of Wikileaks

The NSA’s Egregious Liar: Why This Definition Should Matter

further reading:








A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

A Sociopaths & Democracy Project

All original work and art © copyright by Ronald Thomas West; for profit and mass paper media redistribution prohibited



I recall it was 1974 I was drinking at the Sportsman Bar in Columbia Falls, Montana, when myself and a friend were confronted by a grizzled sheepherder. We were both young Vietnam veterans but with long hair, not unusual at all in the Northern Rocky Mountains. We called ourselves “Mountain People” and ourselves and peer generation grew up mixed with Indians, and we were not hippies at all. So, the sheepherder wanted to sort what type of longhairs we were, I suppose. Confronted with a garrulous character, my friend George & myself satisfied his curious but irreverent interrogation in a proper country-boy way (laughing at his questions with indirect answers consisting of jokes between us at what we heard) until he was becoming satisfied we weren’t from California or some such exotic place. But he’d then let his guard down and I nailed him with a joke that afterward I thought might kill him.

As if to finally test our authenticity with making a point only real country people know how to tell the most outrageous lie with a perfectly straight face (adapted from Native American humor technique), he pronounced to George and myself “I am 45 years old” (in fact a badly beat up 70 years would be a generous assessment) and took a large swig from his beer mug while judging our reaction. Striking like a snake, I told George “We had better check his teeth” (for wear, how the age of a horse is determined, e.g. a horse advertised for sale as 5 years old isn’t actually 15 years) and half his swig of beer must have gone to his lungs instead of belly, when he involuntarily laughed at/choked on, my observation (blowing beer out of his mouth, nose, and onto the bar.)

The antiquarian shepherd hung on to the rail of the bar, and barely managed that, while desperately struggling not collapse to the floor, his complexion radically changed as he went into extended coughing fit that both George and myself actually believed might kill him.

George was the more concerned of the two of us, better than my attitude was (mine had always had more Indian), as we deliberated aloud for the choking man’s edification, whether either of us was competent to, or even should attempt to resuscitate someone so grizzled, garrulous and disingenuous, if he dropped and passed out from choking. George was of the opinion resuscitation would be generous and speak well for our community, my position was our neck of the woods would be better off without such a character, after all, his life had been devoted to caring for what us cattle people called ‘prairie maggots’ and the sooner we’d be rid of any such abomination, the better for all concerned.

The old man recovered and didn’t have another word to say, and George and my conversation returned to ’normal.’ Such was life in the Northern Rocky Mountains in a bygone day.

John Helmer’s humor is also deadly, but on a wider, geopolitical scale. To go direct to his humor, go here:


To get his autobiographical explanation of how he arrived at his humor (and discover his website), go here:


Read in English

Priča o tome kako se odbrana svete zemlje američkih starosedelaca promenila, za više od dvadeset godina, u igru međunarodnih intriga i preživljavanja atentata; sa zaključcima

Hronologija događaja u slučaju Ronalda Tomasa Vesta (skraćeni rezime)


Flojd Heviraner, tradicionalni ratni poglavica Blekfit Indijanaca u Montani, me je 1987. godine zamolio da nadgledam interes Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (Šumska služba) za traženje nafte i prirodnog gasa na zemljištu plemena Blekfit, zaštićenim sporazumom, poznatom kao „Badger-Two-Medicine“, takođe poznat kao „Ustupljeni pojas“, koji podleže plemenskim pravima po takozvanom „Grinel sporazumu“ koji je takođe poznat kao „Ugovor iz 1895“.

Flojd je 1988. godine, angažovao Marka Milera iz Ostina, u Teksasu (koji je imao licencu u Montani) kao pravnog zastupnika za Blekfitovo „Društvo hrabrih pasa“, takođe poznato kao i „Ludi psi“, u Flojdovom svojstvu tradicionalnog kulturnog vođe te drevne plemenske organizacije.

Do 1991. godine, kao glavni istražitelj u ime Društva hrabrih pasa, u udruženju sa Markom Milerom, prikupio sam obimne dokumentarne dokaze protiv kriminalnog prstena, koji je radio unutar Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, u ime korporacije ŠEVRON, a koji su sadržali detalje orkestriranog nastojanja da lažiraju usklađenost sa zakonima, koji bi inače trebalo da štite to područje u ime Društva hrabrih pasa, koji obuhvata službenike Sjedinjenih Američkih Država koji su vršili nezakonite radnje, uključujući krivična dela:

Laganje Hrabrim psima i veću Laganje javnosti

Laganje Kongresa o sledećim posebnim primenjivim zakonima (Zakon o nacionalnom istorijskom očuvanju „tradicionalne kulturne baštine“)

Prikrivanje od Hrabrih pasa, veća i javnosti da je Šumska služba upoznata sa tim primenjivim zakonima

Prikrivanje obuke službenika Šumske službe za te iste primenjive zakone Namerno kršenje tih istih zakona, u korist ŠEVRONA

Ova inkriminišuća dokumenta, uzeta zajedno, ukazuju na isprepletenu i organizovanu kriminalnu mrežu, oličenu u vladinim službenicima koji rade u korist ŠEVRONA, u svrhu namernog lažiranja usklađenosti sa zakonom, koji ide do najviših nivoa Sjedinjenih Američkih Država u Vašingtonu DC. Ovaj poseban kriminalni događaj je organizovan i njime se upravljalo iz sedišta Severnog regiona jedan Šumske službe Sjedinjenih Američkih Država u Misuli, u Montani, a implementiran je preko kancelarija Luis i Klark, Nacionalne šume u Grejt Folz, u Montani.

Ova dokumenta su inkorporirana u administrativnu žalbu kada su ŠEVRON-ove (i FINA-ine) dozvole za bušenje bile odobrene po automatizmu u sedištu Severnog regiona jedan u Misuli. Ova žalba je momentalno zaustavila projekat. Neprilika u prikrivanju kriminalne mreže postignuta je birokratskim nalogom, kada je FBI odbio da se uključi (lično sam informisao agenta koji je pregledao dokumentaciju i priznao njihov sadržaj, ali je tvrdio da nema ovlašćenje da reaguje i uputio me na kancelariju tužioca Sjedinjenih Američkih Država (Ministarstva pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država) u Bilingsu, u Montani, za koga je izjavio da je veoma dobro upoznat sa problemima). Nakon što je Generalni inspektor Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država odbio da ovo istraži, kancelarija Generalnog inspektora Ministarstva poljoprivrede Sjedinjenih Američkih Država je izjavila da oni neće da se uključe pod izgovorom da je to pitanje već potegnuto u procesu administrativne žalbe. Pošto se vlada (i Ševron) nisu usudili da dozvole da dokumenta uđu u evidenciju federalnog suda, gde bi bili stavljeni pred sudiju (ili sudije po žalbi u sudskoj parnici), senator Sjedinjenih Američkih Država Maks Baukus je napravio politički dil sa Ševronom koji je sadržao zamenu najma i Ševron se povukao. Kada sam ja lično uspeo da stavim inkriminišuća dokumenta u ruke (odnedavno novog) šefa Šumske službe Flojda Tomasa, on je pokušao da zatvori sedište Severnog regiona jedan

i da premesti operacije u Denver gde „bi bile pod pomnim nadzorom“. Bili su potrebni napori dva senatora Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, Maksa Baukusa i Konrada Bernsa da se ovo preokrene.


Beleška 2) Dva advokata koji su informisali vladinu stranu (Šumsku službu) o domorodačkim pravnim problemima tokom ovog perioda, Džon Ju i Džej Bajbi, kasnije će postati ozloglašeni kao Bušovi „advokati za mučenje“ povezani sa Kondolizom Rajs. Kondoliza Rajs je (pre i posle Bušovog režima) imala bliske veze sa ŠEVRONOM.

Beleška 3) Sedište „Severnog regiona jedan“ u Montani ima dugu vezu sa CIA-om, koja datira od 1950-ih i još uvek aktivan odnos u 1970-ima i verovatno tokom 1980-tih i kasnije, u vezi sa avio uslugama, viškom imovine i pranja novca kroz vazduhoplove korišćene u agencijskom prevozu oružja i otpadničkih elemenata (crni budžet) međunarodne trgovine narkoticima.

Beleška 4) Tokom mog istraživačkog rada, kojim je otkriven kriminalni prsten unutar vlade koji radi za ŠEVRON, Asocijacija veterana je iznenada i lažno dijagnostifikovala da bolujem od „psihoze“. Uspeo sam da poništim ovo tako što sam nezavisno otišao na evaluaciju u isti medicinski centar koji je Asocijacija veterana koristila za proučavanje šizofrenije, i ispalo je da sam čist.

Beleška 5) Nakon ovoga, moju evidenciju u Asocijaciji veterana je pregledao „specijalista“ iz Vašingtona DC i određena dokumenta su nestala, tako da izgleda kao da sam ja prevario Asocijaciju veterana. Na zakazanom saslušanju, gde sam pokazao kopiju kritičnog dokumenta koji nedostaje i koji je bio neophodan za moju odbranu, saslušanje je otkazano na licu mesta, a optužbe odbačene.

Beleška 6) 1998. godine sam dao ostavku na poslu u Milerovoj advokatskoj kancelariji zbog zdravstvenih problema.


2001. godine, iz Vest Glasiera, u Montani preselio sam se u Sandija Park, u Novi Meksiko. Nakon toga, krajem leta 2005. godine, upisao sam najmlađeg sina u Ist Mauntin srednju školu (čarter škola), instituciju za ubrzano učenje. Škola je slučajno imala značajne veze sa moćnim ličnostima u korporativnom vojno-industrijskom kompleksu u Albukerkiju.

Do kasne jeseni, intenzivan pritisak je započeo u obliku prekomernog maltretiranja, činilo se da je namera da budemo naterani da napustimo školu.

Započeo sam sopstvenu istragu i otkrio suštinske razloge. Tokom ovog procesa, ono što sam sam otkrio bilo je sledeće:

Krivična dela vezana za obrazac ponašanja škole i opsežna kršenja građanskih prava posebno učenika manjina, i drugih učenika, od strane neprikladnog uticaja ličnosti ultra desnog krila, rasističkog, „Hrišćanskog Dominiona“.

Ono što spolja izgleda je da je to američka čarter škola (EMHS) sa ubačenim obaveštajnim agentima koji su zaposleni kao nastavnici.

Moguće korišćenje „putovanja u inostranstvo“ sponzirisanih od strane škole kao pokriće za tajne operacije u Latinskoj Americi i Evropi.

U međuvremenu, izazvao sam paralelnu istragu (od kraja 2006. do proleća 2007. godine) o nezakonitim aktivnostima škole, od strane člana školskog upravnog veća, Džima Hilija, u pogledu maltretiranja mog sina i mene. Tokom ove druge (paralelne) istrage od strane člana školskog upravnog veća Džima Hilija, prišao mi je drugi član školskog upravnog veća, David Volter, koji me je obavestio da stajem na žulj članovima „Veća za odnose sa inostranstvom“ i upozorio me (pretnja) „Da se nisi usudio da umešaš advoкate“. Volter je dalje izjavio da bilo kakva akcija da se škola bude odgovorna „Nema šanse“ ni pod kakvim okolnostima. Za manje od godinu dana, jedan nastavnik iz škole (ubačeni obaveštajac, skoro sigurno CIA), Vins Langan, bio je deo tima koji je pokušao da mi postavi zasedu u Berlinu.

Sa nerešenim slučajem Ist Mauntin srednje škole, sveže razveden, prodatom kućom i najmlađim detetom na koledžu, otišao sam iz Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, u julu 2007. godine, da prisustvujem konferenciji na univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg u Majncu, u Nemačkoj.

Nisam imao nameru da se vratim u Sjedinjene Američke Države u kratkom roku, shvatajući da sam stvorio moćne korumpirane neprijatelje, a bez adekvatnih resursa koji su neophodni da se izvrši zatvaranje slučaja čarter škole. Ipak, u međuvremenu sam pokazao osobama koje su povezane sa školskom administracijom da nisam imao nameru da ostavim taj slučaj. To je proizvelo sledeći rezultat:

3. oktobra 2007. godine, rutinski sam tražio bankomat (ATM) koji sam obično koristio kod Johan Taler Čosi šoping centra u berlinskom predgrađu Bric. Tokom moje procene (profesionalna bezbednosna obuka) da li ima nekih pretnji, uspeo sam da pokrenem tim koji je čekao u zasedi kod lokacije bankomata. Pošto sam ih uočio pre nego što su shvatili da su otkriveni, uspeo sam da vizuelno identifikujem Vinsa Langana iz Ist Mauntin srednje škole, jednog od ubica, u okolnostima u kojima su mi i omogućili da pobegnem i da učinim da Langan shvati da je identifikovan. Dve nedelje kasnije, imao sam drugi bliski susret sa pokušajem ubistva od strane nepoznate osobe u metrou broj 7.

Smesta sam (sledećeg jutra) otišao iz Berlina u Lindau (Bodenze).

Beleška 7) Moje praćenje do lokacije bankomata u inostranstvu zahtevalo je pristup mojim bankovnim informacijama koje mogu da se dobiju preko takozvanog „Pisma o nacionalnoj sigurnosti“. Ovo ukazuje na umešanost korumpiranog FBI-a.


Otišavši iz Berlina u Lindau sredinom oktobra, ubrzo sam organizovao preko treće strane (REDIGOVANO) pozivnicu za nemačke vlasti da nadgledaju moju situaciju („pratite me i gledajte“). Ovo je bio namerni trik da uhvatim u zamku ono u šta sam verovao (u to vreme) da je bio pokušaj ubistva uzbunjivača (mene), u vezi sa krivičnim delima koja su počinile bogate, korumpirane ličnosti povezane sa Ist Mauntin srednjom školom.

Dve nedelje kasnije, jednog ranog nedeljnog jutra 4. novembra 2007. godine, dok sam šetao, kada je napolju bilo malo ljudi, prigušeni metak ispaljen iz puške sa velike udaljenosti za malo me je promašio i napravio rupu u parkiranom automobilu pored koga sam prolazio.

Posle toga, u utorak 4. decembra 2007. godine, shvatio sam da sam privukao nemački nadzor koji sam tražio, kada sam putovao da održim prezentaciju u grupi studenata (REDIGOVANO), nemačka policija je pročešljala voz kojim sam putovao, tražila jednog putnika u mom vagonu i tražila lične karte od svih i ispitivala sve osim mene.

Beleška 8) Projektil velike brzine je pogodio parkirani automobil, pored kog sam prolazio, takvom silinom, bilo je jasno zbog zvuka, da je probio metal karoserije, odbio se o potporni zid ispred koga je automobil bio, zarotirao se i zaustavio ispod automobila. Vratio sam se na tu lokaciju posle nekoliko dana, procenio mogućnosti i postalo je jasno da je pucanj ispaljen sa velike udaljenosti, sa prirodnog uzvišenja (strane brda) sa dobrim zaklonom sa udaljenosti od možda 500 metara.


Preselio sam se u Limburg u rano proleće 2008. godine, a zatim u Visbaden (u junu), prihvatajući poziv univerziteta u Majncu, da predajem tečaj (na engleskom) o američkom ustavnom pravu (letnji semestar). Ovo leto 2008. godine bila je intenzivna igra mačke i miša za mene, vezano za moje ubice/lovce. Od nekoliko susreta u Visbadenu, najupečatljiviji događaji su:

Moj motorola (Razer) mobilni telefon sa karticom američkog T-mobile iznenada je prestao da se ponaša normalno, nije više pokaziovao „t- mobile D“ (nemački) logo prijem, nije više tražio međunarodni kod da pristupim svojoj govornoj pošti u SAD-u, u stvari ekran je pokazivao (a telefon se ponašao) kao da sam zaista bio u SAD-u. Nekako je imao konekciju oko ili kroz nemačku prijemnu mrežu i izgleda da ga je koristila američka obaveštajna agencija (NSA) da preko GPS nađe moju lokaciju u realnom vremenu. Prebacio sam moj telefon na nemačku t-mobile pripejd karticu.

Otprilike u vreme kada sam primetio da se dogodila ova promena na telefonu, jedna staklena kuglica je ispaljena na mene dok sam šetao trotoarom punim ljudi na Severnoj strani (moje područje stanovanja) u Visbadenu. Čuo sam nešto što je izgledalo kao da je neki snažni mehanizam sa oprugom otpušten iza mene, i okrenuo sam se da pogledam i video jednog čoveka kako me oštro posmatra dok je izlazio iz gužve (braon stetson šešir od čvrstog filca, nosio je akten tašnu), stao na

ulicu, prešao ulicu i pobegao. Nastavio je da gleda u mene kao da je očekivao da će se nešto desiti. Kada sam se vratio u stan, seo sam za radni sto i skinuo pletenu kapu, jedna veoma mala staklena kuglica, izgledalo je kao da je napunjena mutnom tečnošću, ispala je iz moje kape na tastaturu računara. Ova kuglica se zaustavila nedirnuta u mojoj kapi, tamo gde je kapa bila podvijena na potiljku. Pažljivo sam stavio (bez dodirivanja) tu staklenu kuglicu u malu bočicu od leka sa mojim imenom na njoj, i spakovao je u papirnu maramicu kao meru predostrožnosti da se pošalje po (REDIGOVANO) na analizu.

Nakon ovog prethodnog incidenta, primetio sam da je izgledalo kao da sam praćen sa svrhom da se ustanove moje rutinske navike (GPS komponenta je izgleda bila izgubljena zbog moje telefonske konverzije).

Jedna osoba se urezala u moje pamćenje, iako nisam znao ko je ona u leto 2008. godine, bila je tada aktivni CIA službenik, Sabrina De Sousa. Istakla se zbog toga što mi se nasmešila kada je prolazila ulicom. Bila je delimično obučena u ležernu odeću južne Azije i nasmešila mi se znalački i izrazom koji može da se smatra osobitim samo kada sretnete potpunog neznanca. To je obeležilo De Sousu u mom pamćenju.

Od nekoliko pokušaja tokom ovog perioda, jedan pokušaj je jasno ličio na tehniku korišćenu u „Imam rapito affair“ (skandal otetog imama), poznatu i kao slučaj Abu Omar, u koji je De Sousa bila uključena. Vraćao sam se sa svog predavanja u Majncu kada sam primetio (zahvaljujući svojoj obuci) odstupanje od nečega što bi inače izgledalo kao jedan normalan i nebitan događaj. Grupa muškaraca, obučena u tipično plavo nemačko radno odelo za muškarce, bila je na pauzi.

Ta okolnost mi je upala u oči dok sam prilazio, iz sledećih razloga: nije bilo razgovora uopšte, izgledali su „namešteno“ (ukočeno, kao da im je gluma nepoznata radnja), imali su američki govor tela i ono što bih nazvao fizički izgled „Delta jedinica“ (građu tela koju biste tipično sreli kod hiper fizički istreniranih vojnika za specijalne operacije). Izuzev odeće, uopšte nisu izgledali kao nemački radnici. Moja ruta trotoarom bi me odvela između onoga što je bio zbijeni polukrug trojice ovih „radnika“ i polukruga zatvorenog prema ulici belim kombijem bez prozora, sa otvorenim kliznim bočnim vratima sa najmanje jednim putnikom.

Postojao je četvrti „radnik“ na mestu suvozača (sa otvorenim vratima) jednog automobila parkiranog odmah iza kombija, koji je krio registarske tablice kombija sa zadnje strane. Izgledalo je da je on postavljen na „zadnju poziciju“, u slučaju ako bih ja izbegao ili nekako prošao kroz prvu trojicu, bio je postavljen da me ugura u kombi. Jasno, očekivalo se da ću proći između polukruga i kombija. Prišao sam nezainteresovano, da bih prišao što je bliže moguće zbog vizuelne procene, i u poslednjem momentu umesto da nastavim trotoarom u ono što je sigurno bila zamka kako bi me „zgrabili“ i „oteli“ (mogli su da me ubace u kombi i nadvladaju za nekoliko sekundi, manje od pet, sigurno), skrenuo sam na ulicu, u saobraćaj (imao sam sreće da me neka kola nisu pregazila). Izbegavanje je bilo jednostavno.

Poslednji pokušaj u Visbadenu je bio kada je stan, koji sam iznajmljivao, trebalo da bude oglašen za nove podstanare. Momentalno se zainteresovao jedan par, koji je tamo živeo u vojnoj bazi Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Ovaj nemački par nije mogao da iščeka da preuzme stan od mene, bili su nervozni da se usele što je pre moguće. On je bio iz bivšeg DDR-a, bio je veliki obožavalac Džordža Buša i radio je za američku vojsku u nekom tajnom svojstvu (neuhvatljivo), a ona je vodila cvećaru u bazi.

Ubrzo me je nazvala i izjavila da bi volela da donese neke pakete da ostavi u stanu, veče pre nego što se ja iselim (u petak), što je dodatno upalilo crvenu lampicu. Jednostavno sam rekao da me nazove u utorak pre toga i da onda pita, pošto još nisam mogao da znam da li ću biti kod kuće to veče kada je ona želela da dođe sa paketima. Znao sam (ali nisam rekao) da je vlasnik stana želeo da nešto renovira. Otišao sam nedelju dana pre mog roka za izlazak, i kada je ona nazvala, stan je u potpunosti prečešljao vlasnik, a ja sam već sedam dana bio izvan Visbadena. Kada je pitala da li paketi mogu da se donesu u četvrtak, odgovorio sam „Ja sam u Berlinu, moraćete da pitate vlasnika“. Njena reakcija je bila uzvik „On je u Berlinu!“ svom mužu (saučesniku u zaveri) i onda je njen muž počeo sa tiradom na nemačkom… sa nemačkim vlastima koje imaju otvorenu pozivnicu da nadziru sve moje telefonske pozive, ja očekujem da su otkrili dvoje Nemaca koji rade za američku obaveštajnu službu.

Beleška 9) Bez ulaženja u detalje, postavio sam test tokom ovog perioda, posle gašenja GPS na mom telefonu, poveravajući se bliskoj osobi od poverenja preko Skajpa, tehnikom za koju sam očekivao da bi mogla da funkcioniše da me uhvate i uspeju da ubiju. Ovo je bila sledeća tehnika koju su pokušali, ali bio sam spreman za nju, video sam kako se okolnosti razvijaju i osujetio sam im pokušaj.

Beleška 10) Pomenuću ovde, imao sam skoro jednu celu godinu obuke (1974.-1975.) u vojnoj obaveštajnoj službi za specijalne operacije (19-a grupa specijalnih snaga) sa nekima od najiskusnijih u toj eri i, štaviše, visoko sam obučen kao asimetrični kontraobaveštajac, po pitanju tehnike o kojoj nemam pravo da diskutujem. Koliko god bila posredna, referenca može da se napravi za ovu drugu instancu, sa referencom za čitaoca na ovu studiju: „Nekonvencionalna podrška ljudskoj inteligenciji“, od komandanta L.R. Bremseta, mornarica Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, 28. april 2001., Ratni koledž korpusa marinaca.

Beleška 11) REDIGOVANO

Beleška 12) Izgubio sam određene beleške o hronologiji iz ovog perioda i nakon njega, zbog kasnijeg kvara na mom laptopu i posledičnog gubitka podataka. Posle gubitka podataka, izgubio sam naviku da vodim beleške o mnogim mojim doživljajima, ali mogu da rekonstruišem hronologiju nekih važnih događaja sa drugim zapisima.

Beleška 13) Do kraja 2008. godine, shvatio sam da ovo nije izolovan pokušaj ubistva da se zataška korupcija u školi, već je bilo nešto daleko veće. Moja odluka je bila da ovo isteram što više mogu, u nadi da bi, naročito to što me sada nadzire nemačka policija, to dovelo ka obelodanjivanju šire slike prikrivenog napora u pokušaju mog ubistva. U tom momentu, nisam zapravo očekivao da ću preživeti, već sam bio odlučan da napravim što je moguće više štete kriminalnom elementu preko tajnog aranžmana mog nadzora.


Nakon nekoliko nedelja boravka u Berlinu, u decembru 2008. godine, preselio sam se u Kataloniju, u Španiju, i iznajmio stan u gradu San Feliu de Gišol (San Feliu de Guixols).

Moj boravak u Španiji je bio napet, ali ograničiću moje beleške na nekoliko neobičnih događaja.

Španska domaća obaveštajna služba je direktno komunicirala sa mnom, da bi mi stavila do znanja da me prati. Na koji način su to iskomunicirali (uključujući direktno „hvala vam“, između ostalih događaja, u nekoliko prilika) možda najbolje opisuje ovaj rani primer: Imao sam susret vredan pažnje sa jednom ženom u piljarnici pored svog stana. Bilo je to kao scena iz filma Vudija Alena. Samo nekoliko dana kasnije, odigrala se ova ista scena sa mnom i drugom ženom koja mi je prišla u drugoj prodavnici. Očigledno, ona je prostudirala video snimak ranijeg susreta i ovaj drugi susret je blisko imitirao prvi susret, da mi stave do znanja da me nadziru.

Bilo je to dok sam bio u Španiji 2009. godine, CIA-in službenik Sabrina De Sousa je tužila Sjedinjene Američke Države za diplomatski imunitet za njenu ulogu u slučaju „Imam rapito affair“ ili „Abu Omar case“, što je pojavilo kao vest sa njenom fotografijom u onlajn medijima (Nju Jork tajms) i ja sam odmah prepoznao De Sousu kao onu nasmešenu ženu koju sam sreo u Visbadenu prethodnog leta. Dok sam nadgledao AP Wire (RSS prenos), takođe sam zapazio izjavu pripisanu optuženom italijanskom generalu Nikolu Polariju, nešto kao „da je Kondoliza Rajs lično nadgledala tim za otmice u ovom slučaju“. On je želeo da pozove Rajs na sud u svoju odbranu.

Tada je šira slika mojih sopstvenih okolnosti prvi put počela da dobija pravi smisao. Ako je Kondoliza Rajs „lično nadgledala“ tim za izručenja koji je uključivao Sabrinu De Sousa, ovo je pokazivalo da moj slučaj nije bio samo o Ist Mauntin srednjoj školi, već je od ranije imao veze sa slučajem Badger-Two-Medicine Društva hrabrih pasa Blekfita, ŠEVRONOM i administracijom Buša starijeg. Put karijere Rajsove vodio je od ŠEVRONOVOG borda direktora, preko Savetnika za nacionalnu bezbednost kod Buša mlađeg, pa do Državnog sekretara (Stejt Department Sjedinjenih Američkih Država je sijamski blizanac sa CIA- om) i nazad do ŠEVRONA, u eri posle Buša. Kao slučajnost sa ovim, dva advokata koji su pripremali pravne beleške o pravima Indijanaca koje je Šumska služba citirala u slučaju Badger-Two-Medicine, Džon Ju i Džej Bajbi, su od tada postali ozloglašeni kao Bušovi „advokati za mučenje“ u vezi sa izručenjima.

U junu 2009. godine, u vezi sa ovim novim razvojem događaja, otišao sam na kratko putovanje u Berlin da obezbedim u ugašenoj NVO „Asocijaciji za podršku Severnoameričkim Indijancima“ dosije o Blekfit hrabrim psima, za koji sam znao da će sadržati inkriminišuću, povezanu dokumentaciju. Lično sam prošao kroz dosije da se uverim da postoji kompletan zapis dokumentacije o ŠEVRONOVOM kriminalnom prstenu koji sam ranije sreo u administraciji Buša starijeg (sve je bilo tu) i organizovao da ceo dosije bude prosleđen (REDIGOVANO), što je i urađeno.

Nepoznatog datuma (zbog gubitka podataka) drugi metak iz prigušivača me je zamalo promašio, ispaljen iz visoke zgrade u S’garu, dok sam pešačio iz predgrađa S’gara, preko uzvišenja u San Feliu de Gišol. Ovaj događaj se desio dok sam prolazio pored gradilišta, gde se o jedan kameni nasip odbio projektil visoke brzine. Pešak ispred mene je naglo okrenuo glavu u smeru gde je metak pogodio kamen, to nije moglo da se ignoriše.

24. oktobra 2009. godine, izbegao sam da me ciljano pregaze nova, crvena, iznajmljena kola sa dva tamnoputa muškarca, čije su ruke bile prekrivene tetovažama bandi.

20. februara 2010. godine, iznenadio sam bišeg CIA-nog „Kauboja“ Garija Berntsena (sada privatni ugovarač) na recepciji hotela Barcarola u S’garo, bilo je između 7 i 8 ujutro, dok je prijavljivao svoj tim ubica u hotel. Zajedno smo uhvaćeni na sigurnosnoj kameri.

Gari je prvo imao bled zapanjen izgled koji je prešao u izraz lica kao da je uhvaćen sa rukom u kutiji sa kolačićima, i kao da bi želeo da propadne u zemlju, dok sam ja stajao nekoliko centimetara od njega, doslovno dodirujući se laktovima, a njegovi telohranitelji su samo stajali tamo zureći u mene sa zapanjenim glupim izrazom lica u okolnostima kada im je potpuno uništen paravan, nisam mogao a da im se ne nasmejem na odlasku prema vratima. Dao sam im oko šest sati prednosti pre nego što sam postavio tu činjenicu o susretu tog jutra na internet, gde je španska domaća obaveštajna služba gledala moja ažuriranja o susretima. Berntsen i saradnici su bili pametni da pobegnu.

5. jula 2010. godine, imao sam posetu, oko pola sata, kada su dva veoma ljubazna policajca [Mossos] došla na moja vrata. Ono što su

policajci rekli je bilo interesantno. Policija je upisala moje podatke iz pasoša, pitala me o detaljima da potvrde moj identitet, preko radija su izvestili o mom imenu, mojim podacima i dali mi da potpišem izjavu sa zaključkom da živim u tadašnjem stanu „manje-više jednu godinu, da se preda sudiji“ koji je želeo da potvrdi identitet osobe koja živi u mom stanu. Nisam krio činjenicu da sam neprijavljen u Španiji i pojasnio sam da nemam nameru da se prijavim u imigracionom ili da zatražim prebivalište. Policija me je uverila da moj boravak u Španiji nije problem i da ih nije zanimalo ništa drugo osim da potvrde moj identitet za sudiju.

Negde u ovo vreme sam bio poprilično siguran da sam bio otrovan. Jednog dana sam, nakon što sam jeo napolju, iznenada osetio obilno znojenje bez groznice i kasnije, moje zdravlje je krenulo nizbrdo. To i činjenica da je sudija Baltazar Garzon nedavno bio sklonjen sa svoje sudijske stolice u Španiji pod ogromnim pritiskom od strane SAD-a u korumpiranom i političkom procesu (pomno sam pratio slučaj sudije Garzona), zajedno sa Narodnom strankom koja je preuzela vlast, osetio sam da je moj boravak u Španiji neodrživ. Vratio sam se u Berlin u avgustu.

Beleška 14) Letnji period 2009. godine je nestao iz svih mojih onlajn imejl evidencija, počevši ubrzo nakon što sam objavio ovo pismo od 18. februara 2009. godine onlajn, postavljeno 3. juna 2009. godine. Veći deo juna, ceo jul i avgust su nestali i još mnogo toga, do početka 2010. godine, 4 naloga, 3 na google-u i 1 na yahoo-u. Ovo se poklopilo sa mojim prethodnim praćenjem, preko moje debitne kartice Wells Fargo Debit Card (korišćenje bankomata) i od strane T-Mobile USA mobilnog telefona korišćenjem GPS… sve ukazuje na pristupanje mojim različitim računima, uključujući telefon, bankovne račune i imejl naloge, preko Pisma o nacionalnoj bezbednosti i saučesništva organa za sprovođenje zakona da me prate radi pokušaja mog ubistva u egzilu. Pismo koje sam objavio 3. juna:

18. februar 2009. godine Od: Ronald Vest
Za: Federalni istražni biro Pozdrav FBI

Molim vas da kopija ovog mejla bude stavljena u moj dosije i da istinita i potpuna kopija bude prosleđena Glenu Fajnu u kancelariju Generalnog inspektora u Ministarstvu pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Na osnovu mojih iskustava protekle tri i po godine manje-više, zahtevam sledeće:

Istragu i sveobuhvatni pregled bilo kojih povezanih istraga koje su dozvolile bilo kojoj agenciji Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, uključujući i vašu, pristup (preko Pisma o nacionalnoj bezbednosti ili BILO KOJIH sredstava, npr. Izvršnim nalogom ili pravnim memorandumom koji zaobilazi „FISА“ sud, itd.) mojim ličnim podacima (posebno o mom kretanju preko zapisa bankomata i (GPS) mobilnog telefona, imejla i razgovora na „skajpu“) koje su mogle da dovedu do nekoliko iskustava uključujući, ali ne ograničavajući se na:

U Berlinu, u Nemačkoj, u Johanes Taler Čosi tržnom centru (područje Britz Sud) u veoma bliskoj i napetoj situaciji vrebao me je Vins Langan (ili njegov brat blizanac) iz Ist Mauntin srednje škole (Sandia Park, NM) zajedno sa saučesnikom, 3. oktobra 2007. godine. Kako to može da bude u vezi sa, nekoliko nedelja kasnije, metkom iz prigušivača koji me je zamalo promašio i napravio rupu u vozilu pored kojeg sam prolazio u Lindau, u Nemačkoj.

Pod kojim okolnostima su dalji lov i ono što izgleda da je pokušaj ubistva u vezi sa mojim t-mobile telefonom, konektovanim direktno kroz t-mobile mrežu SAD-a, dok sam bio u širem području regiona Frankfurta, Limburga i Visbadena, posebno krajem marta-početkom aprila 2008. godine, premošćavajući „t-mobile-D“, a ekran je pokazivao i telefon se ponašao kao da sam bio u SAD-u, i koja je veza toga sa prethodno rečenim.

I u vezi sa svim navedenim gore, pregled aktivnosti (REDIGOVANO), bilo da je ona vaša, ili imovina bilo koje agencije u SAD-u ili je sa vama na principu usluga-za-uslugu ili bilo kojom agencijom u SAD-u ili u bilo kojem svojstvu ili povezanim istragama ili akcijama iz prethodnih pasusa, sarađivala u nekoj istrazi ili povezanoj akciji koja me se tiče direktno ili indirektno, sa njom koja se sprijatelji sa mnom za potrebe bilo koje istrage u bilo kom momentu, ili tražeći dovoljno informacija da implicira, ali u stvari iz nehata i pogrešno implicira mene, u nedostatku dovoljno

informacija da me oslobodi, u vezi sa bilo kojim radnjama i/ili postojećim upućivanjem na vašu ili bilo koju agenciju u SAD-u, ili bilo koje osobe povezane sa takvim istragama, akcijama ili agencijama – koje utiču na moje beneficije socijalnog osiguranja na takav način da efikasno koriste službeno svojstvo da me dovedu pod jurisdikciju SAD-a, ili da se mešaju u moju slobodu kretanja ili bilo kako drugačije utiču na moje građanske slobode prema „R.I.C.O.“ kao kriminalna organizacija, ili pod bilo kojom drugom okolnošću povezanom sa prethodnim pasusima, uzrokuju neprikladan pregled mojeg dosijea socijalnog osiguranja što predstavlja maltretiranje i poteškoće u mom i životu članova moje porodice.

I zahtev da se Generalni inspektor za Ministarstvo pravde Sjedinjenih Američkih Država nezavisno raspita kod odgovarajućih vlasti u Saveznoj Republici Nemačkoj za bilo koje poznate činjenice istraga koje su možda vođene ili se vode u vezi sa bilo kojim/svim od prethodnog. Šaljem kao skrivenim primaocima (BCC) ovu komunikaciju dvojici advokata, jednom u SAD-u i jednom u Nemačkoj. Ovo NISU moji advokati. Kopiram njima zato što su odmereni ljudi za koje verujem da imaju najviše moguće etičke standarde i želim zapis ovog mejla u rukama trećih strana kojima verujem – što uključuje bilo koju zakonitu vlast, advokata ili drugu osobu kojoj mogu, po svom nahođenju, da dostave kopije ako naknadno odluče da je tako odgovarajuće.

S poštovanjem, Ronald Tomas Vest

Ovo pismo (iznad) nije odbio FBI mejl server, poslato je na, ali nije dugo prošlo pre što sam počeo da primam sledeći odgovor na mejlove koje sam slao FBI-u u Albukerkiju (ja sam, do tada, obaveštavao FBI o svojim aktivnostima).

Sledeće adrese imaju permanentne fatalne greške <> (razlog: 550 #5.1.0. adresa odbijena

Transkript sesije sledi …dok komunicira sa RCPT za: <<<>… Korisnik nepoznat

Ovo (prethodno) pokazuje da su moji mejlovi prethodno imali rutu do „Slivije Marufi“, koja izgleda da je sklonjena, a njena adresa u kancelariji u Albukerkiju otkazana ili promenjena.

U nepovezanom prigovoru u Federalnom sudu u Albukerkiju koje je postavljeno na internet od strane jedne stranke u maju 2009. godine, našao sam sledeću izjavu:

„.. situaciju preispituje Silvija MARUFI, FBI istražni analitičar“

Ovo jasno pokazuje na FBI agenta Sliviju Marufi kojoj je dodeljeno da me istražuje sve do momenta kada sam poslao pismo FBI kancelariji u Albukerkiju 18. februara 2009. godine, a Marufi je jasno bila „osoba od interesa“ vezana za uporne pokušaje ubistva (mene). Uzgred, FBI nikada nije priznao moje (imejlom poslato) pismo od 18. februara 2009. godine, iako je jasno da su primili ovu komunikaciju.


Živeo sam u Berlinu od septembra 2010. do jula 2012. godine. Od nekoliko incidenata tokom ovog perioda, ovaj se izdvaja:

Dok sam živeo u Šarlotenbergu (Berlin) tokom jula 2011. godine, imao sam svoje prvo iskustvo sa obaveštajnim agencijama koje su koristile prozelitističke evangeliste kao paravan za tim ubica. Razmišljao sam malo o tome da li su „Jevreji za Isusa“ bili MOSAD ili zajednički poduhvat MOSAD/CIA, ali za sada bih ostao pri MOSAD-u. Članak Vejna Madsena je ukazao da je CIA koristila misionare u prošlosti, posebno u Latinskoj Americi, ali su Jevreji za Isusa potpuno druga vrsta. U Berlinu niko neće zabadati nos u posao bilo kog Jevreja, to je savršen paravan (mora da MOSAD tako misli). Ovo je izgleda bio još jedan slučaj „quid pro quo“ (prethodna MOSAD-ova razmena je bio pokušaj na liniji U7 u Berlinu, 14. oktobra 2007. godine) ili kada obaveštajna agencija jedne nacije radi u ime obaveštajne agencije druge nacije, ovo nije uopšte neobično.

To je dvostruko slepo poricanje ugrađeno u operacije, evangelistički Hrišćani koji se predstavljaju kao Jevreji. Četiri od pet, ili možda devet od deset ovih takozvanih „Jevreja za Isusa“ su prevareni i nesumnjivi evangelisti koji jednostavno pokušavaju da ubede ljude da budu „spašeni“. Dovoze ih avionima širom sveta u smenama, gde dobrovoljno

rade kao misionari, i podobni su i pri ruci da idu u bilo koje područje gde treba da se dogodi operacija ubijanja.

Meta treba da se navikne da ih viđa u svojoj okolini i to je ono što treba da napravi ugodno okruženje misionarima, dok se vaše navike proučavaju, kojim U-Bahn (metroom) putujete i uobičajeno vreme. Kada se meta navikne i ignoriše „Jevreje za Isusa“, sa uspostavljenom rutinom, nesumnjivi, prozelitistički članovi se zamene sa timovima ubica iz MOSAD-a koji nose majice „Jevreji za Isusa“, i meta (teorija mora da se održava) neće primetiti da je označena kada ulazi u metro gde će „najnehrišćanskija“ otrovna igla, koja ne može lako da se vidi na sigurnosnim kamerama, ubodom izazvati srčani udar u gomili ljudi, i tako se još jedan pridruži ljudima koji padnu mrtvi od prirodnih uzroka svakog dana, to je tako jednostavno. Osim kada nije tako jednostavno, kada je meta svesna onoga šta se dešava, zato što je obaveštajna agencija glupa.

Kada se Amerikanci koji su doveženi avionom sa Biblijskog pojasa Srednjeg zapada zamene Izraelcima čije je generalno ponašanje, izrazi lica i govor tela od glave do pete drugačiji od prevarenih evangelista (koji ne bi trebalo da, na kraju krajeva, budu iznenađeni što će stvarni Jevreji biti uključeni u njihovu organizaciju), to neće propustiti niko mog nivoa obuke. Bilo je to u Šarlotenbergu, primetio sam dva Izraelca kako proučavaju moje navike, dok su Amerikanci pokrivali veće javno područje kuda sam često išao, nekoliko dana, a onda su Izraelci motrili na moj ulaz u U-Bahn. Ušao sam, ali umesto da idem dole na drugi nivo i da uzmem voz, izašao sam na drugom ulazu, kao da sam koristio U-Bahn stanicu kao metod da prođem raskrsnicu bez dodira sa semaforima iznad zemlje, dok sam posmatrao pratioce koje sam mogao da primetim i naravno… jedan visoki Izraelac u civilnoj odeći (nije imao majicu „Jevreji za Isusa“) je promenio smer i pojavio se iza mene, ali ja sam bio spreman na to i postavio sam se leđima prema zidu kod stola kafića na otvorenom, između ljudi koji su takođe bili okrenuti prema njemu, leđima prema zidu i nije mogao da me pogodi iglom, a da se ne oda. Potpuno pogrešno mesto sa gomilom ljudi je bila moja prednost, a ne njegova. Glupo je izučavao događaj jedan minut, oklevajući, krećući da pođe, ponovo zastajući da prouči, pitajući se šta da uradi, dok je očigledno

iziritiran odustao i otišao dok sam ja uporno i direktno gledao u njega, a on u mene.

U avgustu 2012. godine, preselio sam se u malo selo na jugu Nemačke.

Beleška 15) U avgustu 2011. godine, (REDIGOVANO), koji je uglavnom izgubio kontakt sa mnom nakon što sam mu dostavio staklenu kuglicu iz moje kape u Visbadenu da dostavi na analizu, i nakon toga kada sam mu dostavio inkriminišući dosije Badger-Two-Medicine, kontaktirao me je samo toliko da napravi izgovor o prekidu naše bliske saradnje (optužio me je da sam pisao „Mržnju“ upućujući na moje satirične eseje) koja je trajala skoro dvadeset godina. Moj utisak je da je (REDIGOVANO) izgubio živce.


U novembru 2012. godine, posetio sam Berlin i imao blizak susret sa potencijalnim ubicom na U7 metrou (treći U7 pokušaj tokom 5 godina) i ovaj incident je bio, kao u poslovici, kap koja je prelila čašu.

Do tog momenta, više od pet godina su domaće nemačke vlasti bile svesne i/ili pratile moju odiseju, a da nisu preduzele akciju da izvrše pravdu, nisu hapsile i nisu sudski gonile, pa sam shvatio da neće nikakva akcija biti preduzeta sve dok je ulizica SAD-u, konzervativna vlada, na vlasti u Nemačkoj. Nakon što sam neko vreme razmišljao o tome, odlučio sam da udarim na nemačku vladu. Razvio sam pravnu strategiju da isprovociram Nemačku na Međunarodnom kriminalnom sudu, za podsticanje i pomaganje SAD-u u zločinima za koje SAD ne mogu direktno da budu tužene zato što SAD ne pripadaju Rimskom statutu, koji je napravio taj sud. Takođe sam odlučio da proguram informacije o Hrišćanskom ekstremizmu u Pentagonu, pomoću materijala koji sam dobio u neformalnoj saradnji sa Fondacijom za vojnu versku slobodu (od juna 2008. godine), o nemačkim parlamentarcima, zajedno sa obilnim anti-semitskim mejlom punim mržnje usmerenim protiv fondacije, koji mi je dao Majki Vajnstajn, predsednik MRFF (Fondacije za vojnu versku slobodu). Ovi napori su počeli iz mog skrovišta u južnoj Nemačkoj, 2013. godine.

Beleška 16) Prema izveštaju o istraživanju Vašington posta iz 2011. godine, „nekih 1 271 vladina organizacija i 1 931 privatna kompanija rade

na programima povezanim sa protivterorizmom, državnom bezbednošću i obaveštajnim radom na oko 10 000 lokacija širom Sjedinjenih Američkih Država. Procena je da ok 854 000 ljudi, skoro jedan i po put više nego što Vašington D.C. ima stanovnika, imaju bezbednosna odobrenja najvišeg nivoa.“

Ovo je podržao članak na „Hiljade tehnoloških, finansijskih i proizvodnih kompanija radi blisko sa agencijama za nacionalnu bezbednost SAD-a, pružaju osetljive informacije i zauzvrat primaju beneficije koje uključuju pristup poverljivim, obaveštajnim podacima, reklo je četvoro ljudi koji su upoznati sa procesom. Ovi programi, čiji su učesnici poznati kao partneri od poverenja, sežu daleko izvan onoga što je otkrio Edvard Snouden, računarski tehničar koji je obavljao posao za Nacionalnu bezbednosnu agenciju“.

Dodatno, nadzorni organ Kongresa SAD-a, GAO (Vladina računovodstvena kancelarija), izveštava kao rezultat manjkavih podataka, obaveštajne agencije SAD-a: „nisu dobro pozicionirane da procene potencijalne efekte oslanjanja na osoblje ugovarača“

I onda, jedan oficir vojne obaveštajne agencije SAD-a je izjavio za Buzzfeed: „Mislim da ako bismo imali šansu, veoma brzo bismo to završili.“ [Obaveštajna služba SAD-a bi želela da nađe Snoudena]. „Ležerno se šeta ulicama Moskve, vraćajući se iz nabavke namirnica. Vraćajući se u svoj stan, slučajno ga ubode prolaznik. Misli da to nije ništa, kada posle nekog vremena počne da se oseća pomalo ošamućeno, i misli da je to parazit iz lokalne vode. Ode kući potpuno bezbrižno i sledeća stvar koju saznate je da je umro pod tušem“.

U stvari, većina nenavedenih događaja (u ovoj hronologiji) koje sam doživeo su imali veze sa uhodama, čije je ponašanje profilisano za akciju, kao što je opisano u prethodnom pasusu.

Ovo ukazuje na apsolutnu korupciju američke obaveštajne službe, gde korumpirani Pentagon, koji je bacio vladavinu prava kroz prozor, i povezane korumpirane korporativne ličnosti (npr. Hrišćanski ekstremisti Kondoliza Rajs i bivši vrhovni komandant NATO-a i Obamin savetnik za nacionalnu bezbednost general Džejms Džouns, u saradnji sa ŠEVRONOM) mogu da pristupe tajnom materijalu preko Pentagonske

NSA (Agencija za nacionalnu bezbednost) suštinski u bilo koju svrhu koju žele, sve do i uključujući i ubistvo.


2013. godina je bila uglavnom mirna, u vezi sa pokušajima mog ubistva, radio sam iz svoje sigurne kuće u južnoj Nemačkoj. Uspeo sam da podnesem tužbu kod Međunarodnog kriminalnog suda protiv Nemačke (trenutno na čekanju, jer je sud tražio dodatne informacije) i započeo sam kampanju da edukujem nemačke parlamentarce o hrišćanskom ekstremizmu koji vodi Pentagon, a koji inficira NATO. U septembru 2013. godine, preselio sam se u Lajpcig. U decembru 2013. godine sam otišao iz Nemačke da živim sa svojom devojkom u (REDIGOVANO). Prijavili smo se da živimo zajedno i tri nedelje kasnije, uručen mi je nalog Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova o proterivanju iz države. Nalog je bio na snazi širom Evropske Unije, i kao posledica toga, bio sam pod svakodnevnom pretnjom deportacije u SAD. Krajnje je nemoralno da me prisiljavaju da tražim politički azil u ovim okolnostima, ali u stvari to je tačno ono što može da bude potrebno u ovoj stalnoj lakrdiji od pravde, u kojoj su pravne institucije odbile da krenu protiv kriminalaca koje sam izložio vlastima.


Rezultat onoga što sam nazvao „alfa“ istragom je jasan.

Korporativni organizovani kriminal u vojno-industrijskom kompleksu u dosluhu sa institucijama u NATO-u i odmetnutim elementima u obaveštajnim agencijama (sa izvan orvelovskim obrtom kada je ubačen „Hrišćanski dominionizam“), zajedno formiraju jednu međunarodnu „duboku državu“ koja je posvećena subverziji i eventualnom svrgavanju i/ili kontroli zapadnih demokratskih institucija. Nemačka vlada i organi za sprovođenje zakona su sada potpuno svesni „alfa“ elemenata koji su operisali izvan parametara zakona u Nemačkoj. Uzgred, alfina operaciona komanda i kontrola smeštena u SAD-u je zastrašila nemački politički establišment na najvišim nivoima.

Sa nemačkom vladom, dobro upoznatom sa svim neophodnim činjenicama u vezi sa „alfom“, od policije na lokalnom nivou do glavnih političara u Nemačkoj, zaista postoji još malo stvari koje mogu da se

postignu. „Alfin“ istražni rezultat se ne može gurati pod tepih doveka, previše ljudi sada zna šta se dešava i na kraju, ja imam malo kontrole nad tim kada će to izaći na videlo ili kako će se razvijati kasnije. Ovo će imati veze sa preostalim institucijama u vezi sa vladavinom prava koje još nisu preuzete od strane kriminalne organizacije iza „alfe“. Nepobitna je odgovornost ovih institucija da poguraju napred informacije koje su iznete i okružuju „alfu“; u pravcu ponovnog uspostavljanja autentičnog ustavnog poretka.

Beleška 17) U Nemačkoj, gde nema oklevanja da se hapse i sudski gone islamističke terorističke ćelije, čvrsto rešene da izvrše zaveru za ubistvo, pet uzastopnih nemačkih ministara unutrašnjih poslova nisu uspeli da deluju protiv istog ponašanja kada se ono vrši od strane ili u ime hrišćanskih ekstremista u američkim obaveštajnim službama i povezanih korumpiranih ličnosti koje vrše zločine na nemačkom tlu. Ti nemački ministri unutrašnjih poslova, po redu svog nameštenja u ministarstvu su:

Wolfgang Schäuble, 22. novembar 2005. do 28. oktobra 2009. Thomas de Maizière, 28. oktobar 2009. do 3. marta 2011. Hans-Peter Friedrich, 3. mart 2011. do 17. decembra 2013. Thomas de Maizière, 17. decembar 2013. do 14. marta 2018. Horst Seehofer, 14. mart 2018. do sada.

Post scriptum beleška bi bila da su se slučaj svete zemlje Blekfita iz Montane i čarter škole Ist Mauntin u Novom Meksiku desili uporedo, a na kraju su bili konvergentni; ukrštajući zajedničke ili povezane interese u vojno-industrijskom kompleksu.

Ronald Tomas Vest, maj 2021.


Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

This essay goes to the matter of Kosovo; where the Western states (NATO & the EU) has determined Serbia is not fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Albanians) on their own (Serbian) territory but the now purported (by the West) independent Kosovo is fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Serbs.)

The EU position seems to embrace attitude of ‘never mind the inconvenient fact’ that recent Kosovo ‘leaders’ are being arrested and delivered to international tribunal for crimes against ethnic Serbs (includes organ harvesting), also not to mention what amounts to mere ‘lip service’ (no concrete action or enforcement) concerning the repatriation of 250,000 Serbs driven from Kosovo in an ethnic Albanian engineered cleansing pogrom following the NATO bombing of Serbia.

Insofar as an EU repatriation precedent, Croatia’s ethnic cleansing of Srpska Krajina shows the dishonesty of the EU position; there is no realistic expectation (and never was) by the European Union that the 200,000 Serbs expelled from this (formerly) Serb majority region would be allowed to return to Croatia and their homes. Meanwhile Croatia had been admitted to the European Union.

So, in the context of Serbs are not trustworthy to govern an ethnic minority of Albanians but Albanians are trustworthy to govern a minority of Serbs, the EU de facto embraces (actual outcomes, not political postures) just the sort of ethnic cleansing the NATO bombing was supposed to stop?

NATO ‘just allowed’ another massive pogrom to happen when they’d gained control over Kosovo? Huh. Maybe that Albanian ‘majority’ wasn’t statistically big enough to justify an independent Kosovo (and secure a now ostensibly ‘independent’ Kosovo a ‘right’ to host Camp Bondsteel.)

Now, in this tangled pressures of arbitrary jurisdictions imposed on Serbia by the EU, NATO and the American military occupation of Serbia’s southern-most province of Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel), it should do to breakdown the logistics of the Western democracies dishonest game.

“Camp Bondsteel is the main base of the United States Army under KFOR command in Kosovo. Located near Ferizaj in the eastern part of Kosovo, the base serves as the NATO headquarters for KFOR’s Multinational Battle Group East”

The order is interesting, as well, the nomenclature. The American army figures first (“main base of the United States Army”) ‘under’ (watch how this deceit plays out) KFOR command … serves as NATO’s headquarters for KFOR’s Multinational Battlegroup ..” or in the deciphered military ‘Orwellian-speak’ the American dominated NATO (every NATO “Supreme Allied Commander Europe” has been an American general throughout NATO’s history) keeps a “Battle Group” in Kosovo. This language is entirely inconsistent with ‘peace keeping.’ It is worth noting here, it had been when this occupying force had been 50,000 strong and deployed across Kosovo, Kosovo’s ethnic Albanians were ‘somehow’ allowed to push 250,000 Serbian civilians out of Kosovo in a pogrom that can only be defined as ethnic cleansing in violation of international human rights conventions.

In short other words, the KFOR mission established to bring an end to the fighting, between the Serbian army and the Kosovo Liberation Army, after the Serb army was withdrawn, KFOR clearly took the side of the Kosovo Liberation Army and ‘stood guard’ as the KLA (an insurgent army) was allowed to push 250,000 Serb residents out of homes in their own country, an event the Serb army had prevented prior to NATO establishing control.

Now, the preceding evolving into a NATO ‘authority’ had been extrapolated from UN Resolution 1244 which language is quite inconsistent with the historical reality…

“to resolve the grave humanitarian situation in Kosovo, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and to provide for the safe and free return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes”

…while noting Kosovo is entered into the UN record as territory belonging to Serbia (Yugoslavia being a union of Serbia & Montenegro at this time.)

In short, on the pretext of ‘humanitarian intervention’ via a UN Resolution that NATO had never intended to honor (‘the proof is in the pudding’), an illegal insurgency had been morphed, via geopolitical chicanery, into a rouge ‘state’ governed by KLA war criminals secured by NATO.

“Transcendent Corruption” is the value I have assigned to the parties embracing ‘color of law’ (a veneer of legality masking corruption) wherein law is made to serve the interests of autocrats (e.g. Merkel), plutocrats (e.g. the Clinton & Biden families), & oligarchies (e.g. the European Union) and when taken together amount to rule by the most powerful corporate board personalities (the puppeteers) in the 21st Century model of feudalism manifesting as fascism but is labelled democracy to assuage the peasants (the citizens) sensibilities.

All of this follows on historical facts overlooked by the Western propaganda machine; Eastern Orthodoxy’s majority Serbian population in the region of Srpska Krajina recently (90s Balkan Wars) had been ethnically cleansed from Catholic Croatia by “Operation Storm” (never mind the Serbs have been made the boogeyman for everything that went wrong with the breakup of Yugoslavia), as well the fact unnatural ethnic borders have been enforced in relation to Republik Srpska, ensuring there will be ongoing tensions within Bosnia on the border of Serbia and not least, the remnant Serb majority region in the North of Kosovo is denied their right of self determination to join with Serbia, ensuring perpetual inter-ethnic conflict that serves only to weaken the institutions of state via ongoing radicalization of both populations, Orthodox Christian Serb and Muslim Albanian. And then, we have Metohija or the bona fide historical spiritual center of the Serbian people of the past 1,000 years.

It must be noted that, similar to the Sioux Indians had founded their culture upon a spiritual relationship to the Black Hills of South Dakota from which they had been expelled, Serbia’s relationship to “Old Serbia” (Kosovo) is little different; imperial ambition had seen the Serbs ethnically cleansed by the Albanians on multiple occasions, first under the ‘patronage’ of the Ottoman Turks favoring the Islamic population, then a minority, and after, the Albanians were backed in further pursuing pogroms against Serbs of Kosovo by the fascist Axis powers of World War II (similar to Croatian Ustasha persecution of Serbs during the war) pushing more of the Serb population out, wherein a coup de grace of sorts was delivered by communism under Tito, who forbade ethnic Serbs to return to their homes in Kosovo following 1945. This is a legacy NATO has furthered as ‘enforcers’ of wresting away Kosovo from Serbia. Kosovo is the original “Old Serbia” that continues to hold the center of Serbian cultural identity via the (ongoing) monastic tradition of Orthodoxy in the region of Metohija.

Then, steps into this mess the last people (if they had any sense of shame at all) who should mediate the current tensions, the Germans, Angela Merkel, particularly, and more recently, Ursula von der Leyen, whose family pedigree is a who’s who of empire personalities that cannot help perception in a Serbia whose memories of the NAZI occupation are still sharp.

‘Mediating’ the current controversy where Kosovo’s criminal administration (under the ‘protection’ of NATO) is allowing radical Wahhabism to proselytize the ethnic Albanian population away from the more moderate mainstream of Islam in the cradle of the Orthodox Serb civilization, Europe demanding Serbia recognize and do business with a cabal of criminals couldn’t do a better job of promoting a war of civilizations if it had actually tried; if one were to presume it is mere incompetence derived from ego-narcissism has birthed this circumstance into the present. But maybe it is more than that, a weakened Serbia with artificial borders is ‘low hanging fruit’ with possibility of consolidating control over a region culturally tied to Russia, as well, historically coveted by the Catholic headquarters at Rome.

In the many geopolitical machinations employed by Merkel, von der Leyen, Trump (and now Biden), not to mention the ‘rolling over’ to sound of a dog-whistle by Serbian sell-outs Vucic & Brnabic, there is a canine turd on the table no one dares mention: the Western Christianity’s animus towards Eastern Orthodoxy, particularly Slav Orthodoxy. The smell is in the air.

“…keeping in mind the fact that Bishop Grigorije has a very strong influence among the bishops, the regime has decided to do everything possible to reduce the chances that a man opposed to the government would be elected the new patriarch.

“That is why the confrontation with Grigorije, who has repeatedly said what he thinks about the “golden age of Serbia”, is becoming more and more acute and dangerous. Although the reason for this is his interview given almost a month ago, the fact remains that Grigorije is a threat the regime’s plans on two fronts which is more than enough reason to present this priest from Herzegovina as Serbia’s greatest enemy and a man who “divides the believers”.

“The matrix is always the same – the opponent is first dragged through the mud by the media, with the media, which broadcast on national frequencies, usually discovering “unknown facts”, i.e. false information, about him and his life.

“If this is not enough, they move on to the recording of videos in which “brave”, albeit unknown reporters, question the human characteristics of the victim of persecution, which is also an open invitation to lynch. Those who do not understand this, just think back of how Oliver Ivanović died”

Finally, something a little closer the real reasons behind the invitation to make the assassination manifest:

“…the instigators of the smear campaign against the bishop decided to take advantage of the fact that he does not share the vision of “progressive” Serbia and the Church and thus mark him as a traitor, while creating the impression that it would be a patriotic act to remove [assassinate] such a person” [1]

The lie of the Serbian state (Vucic oligarchy) concerning Bishop Gregorije being in opposition to the church is egregious; the Church position has always been Metohija is, and always will be, Serbia. Insofar as ‘progressive’, the ‘progress’ of the (German controlled) European Union has been little short of demanding an European monoculture derive from the social tensions born of multiculturalism. It is unnatural process, devoid of community spirit, temporally corrupt in the extreme and founded upon geopolitical propaganda lies, as has been the entire business of an independent Kosovo. Post 1945, the Reich is realizing its vision ‘over the long game.’ Recalling Rome’s embrace of Sainthood for the Catholic (Nazi collaborator) Alojzije Stepinac, it is perfectly clarified Slav Orthodoxy has no place in this ‘vision.’

If there were the slightest intention to preserve the integrity of Serb Orthodoxy in the machinations of Western Europe in the Balkans, Vucic would propose, Brnabic would initiate and the European Union would endorse an exclave of Serbian territory in that remaining portion of Metohija that is majority Serb populated. It would have more population than some United Nations states and there is precedence in Azerbaijan’s exclave Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. But, no, this is not on the table, it is intended Slav Orthodoxy will be strangled and made extinct (replaced with ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholicism) in the Balkans.

Populism, and related nationalism, manifest in two forms, the healthy and the unhealthy, the benign and the malignant, the tranquil and the rage. The EU, NATO, and yes, the Church at Rome, all, have a hand in fostering the unhealthy, the malignant, and the rage. The epilogue of this would be the conversion of Serbia to “progressive” European monoculture at the point of a gun.

“There is not the smallest reason for confounding nationalism, which is the desire of a people to be itself, with imperialism, which is the desire of a people to prevent other peoples from being themselves” -Cicily Isabel Fairfield




A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Čitajte na srpskom

There is a glowing review of Obama-esque ‘hope’ concerning the nomination of William ‘Bill’ Burns as the new administration’s Director of CIA. The review is plausible/improbable & outcome remains to be seen. [1]

Written by an Indian diplomat, M K Bhadrakumar, he takes an interesting quote from Burn’s book ‘The Back Channel: A Memoir of American Diplomacy and the Case for its Renewal‘ in a context of less ‘militarization’ wherein Burns asserts American diplomacy should:

“…harness all the tools of American statecraft – from the soft power of ideas, culture, and public diplomacy, to … intelligence-gathering and covert action”

As well, Bhadrakumar notes:

“Burns is widely praised as a titan of the foreign policy world and also happens to belong to that breed of diplomats who believe that diplomacy and espionage are two sides of the same coin”

One presumes the article & quotes more or less exclude CIA paramilitary operations (e.g. Syria) as a direction that should be emphasized in Burns’ philosophy as the new Director of Central Intelligence.

But, there is this other point, in case of Burn seeing diplomacy & espionage as “two side of the same coin” where in fact the CIA & USA’s Department of State are historically more like ‘Siamese twins.’ This second is a qualified point that sees things a bit differently than two sides of the same coin (public postures vs back-stabbing acts) in a matter of Siamese twins or more than one cognitive process pushing or initiating policy in fact. This is more than a typical two-faced ‘diplomacy’ coin, in a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is up to.

Of course, as always, it will be the factual legacy Burns leaves behind him that will determine what will be and what came to naught. In this vein, it should do to examine a bit (just a bit) of Burns’ history, raise a question and propose a litmus test.

My recollection of Bill Burns in respect to Iran is a bit different to the pundits of the present; as a matter of fact Burns has been in past circumstance of having to work with some of the USA’s nastiest ‘diplomatic’ personalities and guilt by association, e.g. a murderess or the murderous Condoleezza Rice, is ‘just deserts’ in the political game. [2]

That Burns is presumably a good reporter of facts is no solid indicator his proposed philosophical outlook will be of any significance whatsoever. [3]

The question posed is, how much control over the actual function of the CIA Burns will actually possess (or even care to possess.) He will be pressed from above and below to implement criminal policies, and authorize criminal acts. His superiors are incompetent politicians steeped in aggressive geopolitical lies & greed, e.g. ‘The Russians did it’, no matter if or when the Russians did not do it & rank corporate corruption or practically unlimited “Citizens United” undisclosed PAC money and; his minions (senior CIA operatives), are quite frankly, tactically & socially stupid, not only patently treasonous, international criminals. [4]

Litmus test: when the present and two preceding FBI directors (Mueller, Comey & Wray), all of them, have shielded a narcotics cartel hit-man (serial killer), that is Enrique ‘ricky’ Prado, for the fact Prado doubled as a high ranking CIA officer-operative, does Burns stop protecting Prado, allowing prosecutions to go forward, or does Burns consider shielding Prado that part of “covert action” that is legitimate ‘statecraft’? [5]

In fact it is time someone cleaned up the CIA’s act. Will Burns do it or will he even exercise control over an agency shielding numerous rank killers, not only Prado? Does the Obama-Brennan era extra-judicial “Kill List” targeting American citizens, and the harassment, sabotaging the personal lives of, and framing of dissident Americans living abroad (a laundered, CIA version of the FBI’s COINTELPRO) cease and desist or do these mafia quid pro quo programs see new ‘life’ breathed into them? [6]

This target (yours truly) wants to know. Because as of this week, in Serbia, it is become clear the ‘dogs have not been called off.’ [7]

But maybe I should know already. The counter-point analysis that should be read, relating to Burns’ “The Back Channel”, describes a man incapable of comprehending his failures. The teaser from John Helmer:

“William Burns is the man who might have been US Secretary of State if Hillary Clinton had been elected President in November 2016. Since then he has been composing an apologia pro vita sua — a book of religious convictions describing what went wrong through no fault of his own or of God’s, explaining what a victim Burns and the United States have been of bad luck; bad timing; President Donald Trump’s “narcissism”, “erratic leadership” and “active sabotage”; and Russian malevolence

“To the ex-Ambassador to Russia and ex-Deputy Secretary of State, the Russian evil is a motiveless, psychopathological crime. Russians, especially the few high-ranking ones Burns met as a State Department apparatchik, can’t help themselves. There is no cause and effect between action and reaction, between US offence and Russian defence. Nothing Christian Brothers alumni and missionary Americans like Burns have done explains (in Burns’s tract) why the Russians behave so badly, and why their souls must forever burn in hell unless they repent. Five hundred pages of holier-than-thou, confessor to the wicked Russians — that’s been the Burns mission” [8]











A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

^ Bellingcat, er, Bill the Cat

Navalny poses as a higher ranking ‘apparatchik’ within Russia’s security services, scrambling to understand what went wrong with the plot to murder (himself) with the nerve agent novichok. He (Navalny) ostensibly has reached one of the foot-soldiers (a Russian intelligence services officer, at his home phone) tasked with carrying out Navalny’s assassination (I would have said you can’t make this shit up except for someone clearly did.) The hoax is audacious.

The 1st problem with Navalny’s ‘hoax call’ reported by Bellingcat is the dates. The 2nd problem is Bellingcat is the reporter. Or, you can switch the order, these are co-equal problems, followed by a 3rd problem that is the call itself.

1) The poisoning happened on 20 August, the ‘hoax call’ is made on 14 December, and released by Bellingcat on 21 December. Now, wait a minute. The context of the call, a desperate demand for answers of what went wrong (Navalny didn’t die) for a report to higher up authority, is something you would expect within the first 48 hours, not nearly three months later. By the time this call was made, that dust should have settled and been vacuumed up by Russia’s intelligence services, everyone would have been debriefed by this time, including the target of the hoax call.

2) Bellingcat is an organization on the point of ‘the Russians did it’ (or the Russians should be held responsible, even if they didn’t do it) world information warfare stage from Syria chemical warfare crimes to MH17 to the Skripal poisoning to (now) Navalny (and whatever else escapes my memory at the moment.)

Every reasonably competent intelligence officer from either side of the ongoing state of warfare between the NATO & NATO associated intelligence agencies, and Russia, perfectly assumes Bellingcat is a front for British intelligence, if they are honest, which is forbidden in this case, if you work for Western intelligence (as well, the CIA might easily request a favor from MI6 and its proxy Bellingcat, time to time.) Of course, if you are Russian, it is not permitted in the liberal democracies to believe anything you have to say (whether truthful or not.)

3) The recorded call itself requires you to believe Russian intelligence officers assigned to assassinations are 85 IQ troglodytes in eternal state of drunk or hungover. That works, if you are a Robert Littell (CIA disinformation) spy novel fan or, alternatively, a 007 freak where Russian intelligence operatives, when it comes to assassinations, are so muscle-bound around the head, there is no space left for brains (having all been squeezed out by steroids, obviously.) But the propaganda ploy works for precisely the subliminal stereotype created in the Western media audience; at many levels we all are conditioned (or attempted to be conditioned) to believe the stereotypes.

At 14 minutes in, there are real questions. He’s too slow & dumb (the FSB guy) he should have been wide awake by now, this all seems scripted. Do we know it is actually the Russian officer on the other end? Rather, is it a MI6 or CIA actor? In the very early stages (long before the 14th minute), the ‘Russian’ intelligence officer should have demanded to make the call himself, calling back from a secure phone to his interrogator (after confirming with his own chain of command), at the least. I can’t believe the Russians are without strict protocol training in this regard. The so-called ‘Konstantin Kudryavtsev’ (a real person but certainly not the person in the call) is too stupid, by far, to demand this obviously important security protocol, and that stupidity is covered by the very fact of discussing ‘a secure line’ while posing him as half-awake & consequently ‘snookered.’ But even a hungover and half-awake 85 IQ (if such ever existed in the FSB, not likely) should grasp violating this protocol while running his mouth could find him hung upside down in chains in the basement of the Lubyanka (FSB Headquarters in Moscow) while his bosses decided what would become of him. This raises a related issue; why would someone who’d so famously screwed up a hit still be on the job? The entire business stinks from the beginning.

Then, at 18 minutes in, the ‘Russian’ troglodyte is volunteering via unsecured line a local investigative chief’s phone number to a ‘superior officer’ (Navalny’s alias) that prior to this call he has never even heard of:

It just goes downhill from there…

The concluding question should be, did Nalvany understand he had been talking to a Western intelligence asset/actor? The answer would be “probably not.” Narcissists are brilliant material for intelligence agency manipulations, in this case of Western intelligence engineering (from the outset) Nalvany being of greater value as an information operations asset in Berlin as opposed to a perpetually failed color revolutionary in Russia.


Related: Initial impression in the Navalny ‘poisoning’ (22 August)


A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


So, Navalny’s Soros worshiping clique is asserting he has been poisoned. Immediately a plane is dispatched from Germany to snatch his body (lingering with a bit of inconvenient life) or better said, ‘rescue’ a gravely ill man from the nefarious Russian state; invoking the ghosts of Litvinenko, Nemtsov (oops, he was shot, not poisoned), and Skripal.

What do all of the above share in common?

1) None of them were in any sense a threat to Putin or the Russian state, in short, all of them had either outlived their usefulness (Litvinenko, Skripal) or never lived up to the expectations (Nemtsov, Navalny) of the West’s propaganda machine (read manipulations by foreign intelligence agencies.)

2) All of them become more useful to the West’s propaganda machine when dead, rather than appearing increasingly impotent, or irrelevant, while alive. How? Their deaths can be blamed on EVIL PUTIN!

Now, before we delve into the unthinkable, let’s (merely for the sake of argument) all rollover and assume Navalny has been poisoned. But not necessarily by the Russian state.

What?! If you have no conscience or soul (a prime ‘talent’ for those waging clandestine warfare via assassinations on behalf of the state) or simply ‘believe’ a wrong can be made into a right (along the lines of thinking ‘Navalny will never pull a color revolution off in Russia, but if Putin ‘poisons’ him, and this helped the West, no doubt he’d understand’ (you know, the future debriefing of Navalny in a WASP/Catholic chapter of Heaven that more or less excludes the Orthodox albeit with ‘chosen’ Soros sponsored exceptions.)

To demonstrate the pure hypocrisy of the West pointing to Putin and the ‘Russian regime’ as ‘poisoners’ one need look no farther than Western intelligence agencies own enraged idiots that cannot keep their mouths shut, this ‘gem’ of an example came in the wake of the Snowden revelations:

“…a US Army Intelligence Officer stated to Buzzfeed: “I think if we had the chance, we would end it very quickly.” [USA intelligence would like to find Snowden] “Just casually walking on the streets of Moscow, coming back from buying his groceries. Going back to his flat and he is casually poked by a passerby. He thinks nothing of it at the time starts to feel a little woozy and thinks it’s a parasite from the local water. He goes home very innocently and next thing you know he dies in the shower.” [1]

Now, if perennial color revolution non-threat Navalny risks looking ultimately impotent (he’d been at it too long with too little result) and would serve the interests of empire better if suddenly dead, and indeed he had been poisoned, probably the Russian state should be the last suspect. So, if it wasn’t Putin, who was it? News for you Kira Yarmysh, Ivan Zhdanov, Leonid Volkov, Cinema for Peace, Pussy Riot and countless other manipulated  stooges, chances are that Navalny, if actually poisoned, was hit by Western intelligence for the fact he was ineffective and therefor ‘transitioned’ from a useless idiot into a useful dead idiot. That thought brings up a bit of recent news:

“A minister has revealed real James Bonds can now eliminate enemies in countries other than war zones.

“Defence minister Annabel Goldie was asked if UK agents target foes “located in non-belligerent states”

“She replied: “The Government may draw on wide a range of tools including lethal force where there is no other effective option” [2]

There you go; United Kingdom had just gone on record as authorizing its intelligence agencies to carry out assassinations in Russia (among other countries.) Meanwhile Putin doesn’t need (or want) the negative publicity of another murder falsely pinned on his ‘regime’, for ‘edification’ in these matters, check out the alternative Skripal narratives, there’s plenty of credible investigators with sites proposing and/or developing evidence refuting the official line. [3], [4], [5], [6]

News for all of you Soros wannabe color revolutionaries, if you think Bernard Émié, Alex Younger, Gina Haspel, Bruno Kahl, Yossi Cohen, or any of the rest of the Western intelligence heads, actually care so much as a rat’s ass about people like Navalny, you’re as dumb as anything has ever set foot in God’s creation. If Navalny were convertible from a color revolution useless idiot to a Western intelligence propaganda operation’s useful dead idiot, to better serve the agenda of Western intelligence, that’s exactly what he’d be, a useful dead idiot. It is not only perfectly plausible that’s what happened to Litvinenko, Skripal, and if poisoned, now Navalny, it is actually far more likely Western intelligence did it than any likelihood these morons had been hit by the Russian state.

Alexey Navalny 2017.jpg

^ the look of mental hemorrhoids 

Follow-up article on Navalny: The Hoax Call








My 1st experience with inspectors general was in 1971 Vietnam where the soldier’s complaints, that our good cafeteria food was being sold through military organized crime to markets and restaurants in the city of Vung Tau, were absolutely covered up by the military watchdog. When a congressman actually showed up to discover for himself what was going on, our meals became excellent for just a few days and then, with the congressman’s departure, our food reverted to nearly inedible survival rations.

My next experience with attorney generals was when investigating a criminal ring working the inside of government for Chevron Corporation, counterfeiting environmental impact statements for purpose of allowing oil and gas development to proceed in areas that should have been protected.

When provided hard documentation of multiple instance of the Forest Service inside cheating (the FBI refused to investigate) of laws to benefit the outside industry, the Department of Agriculture Inspector General simply evaded responsibility by pointing out these issues had been brought up in another bureaucratic channel in an appeal (to be decided by the Forest Service!)

So now, all of these years later, Trump fires the Department of State’s Inspector General Steve Linick and ‘Corona Trillions’ overseer (former Department of Justice Inspector General) Glenn Fine and it all still ties into my experience with the preceding case of the Forest Service, nearly thirty years on.

In short, after Chevron insider Condoleezza Rice became Bush Jr’s National Security Advisor, it would seem a ‘Chevron enemies’ list had transferred to the USA executive branch. It was in 2004 my house was searched without a warrant (while I was out of town) and it had become clear multiple investigations had been opened into my activities with specious rationale or on false pretexts.

This seemed odd as my investigative career had been closed for five years and it been thirteen years since the incriminating, investigative dossier on Chevron had been compiled and forwarded through several official channels. Looking into matters, by 2005 it became clear the source of the present harassment stemmed via local members of the Council on Foreign Relations, leaning on the area’s FBI field office and local law enforcement.

By 2006 it was determined by myself this was developing into one of those circumstance where the target (myself) was high priority and it would be best to get out of the USA.

My house sold in the early summer of 2007 and I left the USA on the pretext of attending a conference at Johannes Gutenberg University, but did not catch my return flight from Europe, and the attempted assassination game was on.

Glenn Fine was Department of Justice Inspector General in 2010 when I attempted to bring my case of the FBI apparently assisting the CIA (and possibly MOSSAD) with attempted assassination of myself. This stemmed from my work on the 1991 Chevron & Forest Service misconduct previously mentioned.

My experience with inspector generals is that of a rank fail, relating to the FBI’s egregious conduct in ‘investigating’ myself actually appears to have been opening my banking information (via ‘national security letter’) to Central Intelligence so my location could be tracked by ATM while I was on the run in Europe from Condoleezza’s (as far as it could be traced to the top) ‘kill list’ (prior to Obama and his Brennan kill list.)

When Obama came into office, the presidential ‘kill list’ became a matter of public record. There has been no known investigation into this by any inspector general, either Department of Justice or Department of State. My own case is well known in detail with as yet unanswered (after 10 years) request for a Department Of Justice Inspector General (Glenn Fine in 2010) look at my circumstance on Obama’s watch. Certainly in some circumstance the duopoly has each others’ backs.

What’s more is, during the tenure of Steve Linick, the Department of State’s Office of the Inspector General has made it as burdensome as possible to actually make contact and pursue whistle-blowing with a closed email system that refuses to recognize ‘unauthorized’ contacts (i.e. anyone outside the system or anyone who hasn’t been extended the ‘grace’ of their email address admitted into the system) rather demanding all process concerning complaints and related documentation be sent and replies accepted by fax or snail mail which (probably by design) insures the geolocation of the whistle-blower.

Even with the valid email address of the appropriate government officials to contact, if your email address is either unrecognized or recognized as someone they do not wish to interact with, the closed system will not allow your messages through. This was discovered by myself when I looked into making a complaint concerning egregious misconduct by certain Department of State officers when applying for routine services of a personal, family nature I will not divulge here.

These officers (almost certainly CIA under official cover) were so determined to deny certain rights in attempt to  force me to present myself in person, the end result is, there are two diametrically opposed decisions by separate USA embassies in two countries in Europe, one granting and the other denying, identical citizen services based on decisions where the one embassy granted the service based on lesser documentation than the embassy that denied the identical service based on stronger documentation!

The difference in the embassies? The granting embassy is in a ‘settled’ western European country where highly competent local professionals are incorporated into the citizen services staff in a small annex that would basically make a rendition impossible, whereas the denying embassy is a CIA infested organism located in a former socialist state that is a target of empire’s demands to conform, where there is a weak rule of law and the citizens services is located in a very large embassy compound from which renditions can be made with impunity.

Ultimately I declined to exercise my right to make a complaint of egregious misconduct by the Department of State to Steve Linick, fully understanding it would be an energy draining exercise in futility.

Essentially, the demand is, if you are the target of the USA, live in a former socialist state under threat of color revolution and also happen to be a USA citizen filing a complaint, paint a bull’s eye on your chest and only then step up with your incriminating information when whistle-blowing to the Department of State Inspector General.

What is different with the inspector generals now is, there is a deep state internecine war with the more overt evangelical/Israeli alliance pitted against the neo-liberal/never-Trump Republican alliance. But on either side, they are all bought and paid for American political pit bulls fighting behind the scenes in off record venues. Without exception, they’re all corrupt.

The difference between American empire run by Democrats & ‘Never Trump!’ Republicans versus the Christian Zionists & Israeli controlled Trump, is the difference between botched operations with & without anesthesia; with the former, the numb but nevertheless soon to be cadaver, lingers just a little longer, with the latter, panic, pain & shock contributes to a bit quicker demise.


A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.


This article may also be read at Fort Russ News

Hapsburg_Satan - 1

This Hapsburg Satan killed thousands of animals, in a single sustained rage, over several weeks, denuding a vast noble estate of all forest life

Cicily Isabel Fairfield, one of those rare social observers with penetrating insight into the hypocrisies of Western culture, speaking to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his assassin Gavrilo Princip, sums up more or less so:

The murder was absolutely to be expected simply from a perspective of social dynamics. Princip aimed his pistol from the absolute bottom of the oppressed and shot dead a principal at the apex of the oppression.

She goes into great detail, with explanation of both backgrounds, and how the archduke and Princip were production of peak and basement of the (then) existing hierarchy. Insofar as nastiness of character, violence of personality and murderous motivations, one might say the archduke was Satan himself, assassinated by a child resident drawn from an Austrian ruled Hell where his parents had been framed as criminal and confined in that domain for the simple fact of being born Serb peasants in Bosnia.

Fairfield’s observations were drawn from contemporary sources, including interviewing eyewitnesses to the last meeting of the archduke, one witness who remarkably noted the archduke practically goosestepped in circles, tweeting in reedy voice, while acting the complete idiot in taking the travel decision that got him killed. If it wasn’t absolute incompetence or an intuitive suicide, then certainly it was fate (policy) killed this Hapsburg Satan.

In the present day, Gavrilo Princip’s ‘hero’ status is largely reduced to the Serb ethnicity; the Muslim Bosniaks who were placed as overlord to Serbs under the Austrian empire see him as a “terrorist” (who’d actually displaced their privileged position), the Croats hate him for the fact he was an ethnic Serb (the pro-Catholic, pro-German, Croatian prejudice opposed to all things Orthodox) and of course ‘mainstream’ Europe’s narrative has nothing or little to say in regards to the assassination’s actual causation by Austrian policy of domestic state terror, practiced by the Hapsburgs, in relation to their subject(ed) peoples.

It followed, the several European monarchs’ demise in the wake of the first two world wars changed nothing in matters of European social habit; today’s practical royals, represented in the likes of the many tyrants or Merkels, Netanyahus and Erdogans of this world, are at the head of what amounts to de facto monarchies (so-called ‘democracies’) whose’ noble class are the large corporate stakeholders, especially the military industrial stakeholders (as it ever were.)

Today’s is merely a repackaged, old state terror model, with modern subject(ed) peoples conditioned to their serfdom as ‘consumers.’ On the backs of taxing the common people, false-flag perpetrated wars of empire go on, with the current era little different to yesteryear’s; coupled to the modern pseudo-politicians’ impunity very much a royal clone of centuries past.

If Gavrilo Princip was an assassin, he certainly was also an involuntary expression of a culture whose’ rulers engage their respective peoples in a predator-prey relationship.

It is for these reasons it would seem World War III is inevitable. The template of Western or European civilization, in and of itself, is culturally a leopard and leopards, it should be honestly said, cannot shed their spots.


%d bloggers like this: