U.S. Department of State spokesman Ned Price makes his case, claiming his statement (shameless lie, actually) is in and of itself declassifying evidence while actually refusing to provide evidence and when that becomes too stupid he goes to ‘trust me, we have it’ and finally claims any evidence (that likely doesn’t exist, keep reading) must be protected.
Then have a read of the disclaimer buried in the (now thoroughly debunked) ‘Russian hack’ report by “joint US intelligence agencies”
”Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact. Assessments are based on collected information, which is often incomplete or fragmentary, as well as logic, argumentation, and precedents” –ICA 2017 01 [pdf] Annex B’s “estimative language” also known as the ‘we make this shit up’ disclaimer buried in the ‘Russian election hack’ report authored by the “joint US intelligence agencies”
This essay goes to the subject of rule-of-law dispensed with like a used condom in an encounter with a familiar prostitute. In this case, the ‘johns’ are the ruling politicians, several media outlets (pornography distributors) of differing persuasions are the pimps, the European Union is an obsessed voyeur of x-rated film, Council of Europe is the whorehouse, and the Venice Commission is the prostitute-pornography star.
So, it’s more than about political leadership, it’s the media they control, and sometimes, it’s the color-revolution media they must sleep with as well as the political fellatio they perform to survive as a mafia entity. Prepare for a bit of insanity that resembles nothing so much as a corrupted neighborhood’s orgy habits where dysfunctional couples in wife-swapping arrangements never break free of the blackmail potential.
First we’ll break down the color-revolution platform reporting; courtesy of a favorite EU and NATO states intelligence agencies’ pimp, N1, a subsidiary of CNN (also known as Counterfeit News Network.)
^ “The Venice Commission welcome the initiative by the Serbian authorities to adopt a draft law on referendum and people’s initiative but said that it has more recommendations
“The Venice Commission said that the revised draft law has followed, totally or partially, most of the substantive recommendations of the previous urgent opinion, aimed at ensuring its conformity with international standards. This is a positive development which is welcomed,” a press release said adding that some issues still need to be addressed
“The new recommendations include abolishing or significantly reducing signature authentication fees, extend the right to appeal to all voters, giving election commissions the authority to check signatures, address the decision-making power of the bodies dealing with proposed referendums, complaints and appeals in a more precise way, provide more detailed rules applicable in the case of emergency, consider reasonably extending the deadlines for lodging and deciding on complaints and appeals” [1]
Just, exactly, what did ‘The Venice Commission’ ACTUALLY “welcome”? Well, it won’t really enter the minds of most people, because the core of the subject isn’t dealt with. Everyone, the ruling party at the parliament, the ‘liberal democracies’ backed opposition, The Venice Commission itself, and certainly not least, media on both sides of the fight over a nation’s future are overlooking (or didn’t bother to read) what is supposedly being implemented, in its reform of so-called referendum law; with the Venice Commission (faux rule-of-law enforcer for the EU & NATO states) saying (in effect) ‘Great job! Now, we just need a bit of tidying up around the issue.’
Meanwhile, over at former color-revolution collaborator turned the regime’s lover, B92 (English translation courtesy of Serbian Monitor)
“At yesterday’s session, the Government of Serbia adopted the draft Law on Referendum and Popular Initiative. This proposal abolishes the mandatory threshold of the required number of voters as a condition for a referendum to be valid” [2], [3]
And then, over at the ‘regime friendly’, Serbian oligarch owned, Telegraf:
“in order to the change the Constitution, that is, for the success of a referendum, it is no longer required for 50 percent of registered voters to turn out” [4], [5]
Ok, to now, summed up, we have: the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission patting Serbia on the back for bringing Serbian law into compliance with the commissions updated (2020) “Revised Guidelines on the Holding of Referendums” and we find the heart of the matter under the subheading III “specific rules” where there are very non-specific rules that are not binding (rules that actually are not rules) in subsection 7:
“7. Quorum and special majorities
“a. It is advisable not to provide for:
“i. a turn-out quorum (threshold, minimum percentage)
“ii. an approval quorum (approval by a minimum percentage of registered voters),
“b. An approval quorum or a specific majority requirement is acceptable for referendums on matters of fundamental constitutional significance.
“c. The requirement of a multiple majority (the majority of voters taking part in the referendum plus the majority in a specified number of entities) is acceptable in federal and regional states, in particular for constitutional revisions” [6]
In other words, if your law calls for 100% citizen-voter registration (a level of participatory democracy that is practically unknown) and it requires more than half of the electorate to approve a change in this model of what would have been a true participatory democracy, this is NOT recommended according to point a. i. & ii.
BUT, according to points b. & c. if this level of participatory democracy is required in existing law to decide any matter of fundamental constitutional significance or to revise the constitution itself, the Venice Commission can’t argue with that but they certainly won’t require it.
Restated in the most simple logic: when a kleptocracy has so alienated its core electorate you can’t get 50% of the eligible voting public to turn out to support changes that will be fundamentally lied about (the alienated electorate know this), the ‘rule of law’ enforcing Council of Europe offers loopholes in the rules enabling the kleptocracy to pursue future changes in law greatly enabling/empowering the kleptocrats.
Never mind this is ostensibly about changing the constitution in regards to ‘reforming’ Serbia’s judiciary to reflect the Council of Europe’s ‘best practices’, the precedent set here points to easier thefts in the future. It is what is on the horizon is why the Western color-revolution propaganda arms like N1 avoid the core issue and assist regime media in concealing the facts; whereas without this ‘rule change’ it would be nearly impossible to change Serbia’s constitution to, example given, surrender sovereignty over Kosovo (an irritation in the Western empire’s plans for the future of Serbia), but now with the rule change, following the next Western intelligence agencies’ color-revolution in Serbia, there should be no problem, if the new regime gets 16% approval determining the national direction (surrendering the entirety of Kosovo), in a vote where 30% of the people turned out to vote, the problem is solved! (for empire.)
Furthermore, if only one half of the eligible people are registered to vote, in a case where this one half of the populace being registered constitutes the whole of the electorate and 30% of this registered electorate turned out to vote in referendum, it is actually 8% of the nation’s people can determine the future of any nation in this ‘liberal democracy’ model (not to mention how this model smooths the way for multinational corporations future consolidating their grip on nations like Serbia.)
This arrangement with the European Union aligned institution, Council of Europe, enforces a ‘democracy’ model that is worse than some so-called ‘banana republics’ and resembles nothing so much as the corrupt tribal politics imposed on certain indigenous nations by the USA. [7]
Now, ask yourselves, are these people you could trust to make law & policy in a multinational, corporate, big pharma enriching pandemic? [8]
To be (treasonous to globalism) or not to be (treasonous to one’s own culture.) That is the question.
The proposition as presented, in a play on Shakespeare’s words, thinly conceals a communications trick; these are not distinct things but the same. There is no question between the two in any sense of what is actually presented, only observation of a single fact from separate construction-perspective.
Multiculturalism in a sense of globalism, historically speaking, is a result of conquest via imperialism. The short example given would be Rome and the ‘Romance Languages’ reflecting Rome’s creation of a linguistic monoculture that, over time, devolved into Italian, Romanian, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese and French being the most spoken, and sharing Catholicism excepting Romania, which is largely Orthodox due to its geographic location and history tied to what became the Eastern Roman Empire. In every geographic case, the original languages are displaced, marginalized or extinct (including in Italy, e.g. Etruscan), together with the original cultures and religions.
At first glance, this might seem a surprising result. How did many cultures become what amounts to a monoculture? How did many languages and cultures succumb to a single language and culture that became a new family of (closely related) languages and cultures?
It is as simple as Latin became the language one had to become fluent in, to competently function within the intra-empire structures as a whole. Did this happen overnight? No. But it finally DID happen; to function as a Gaul from what became France, demanded a working use of Latin when opportunity afforded (or Rome demanded) one live and work in Iberia in what became Spain, no different to peoples of the several Iberian tribes had to master Latin to function in the economy of the globalism of that era. Over time, everyone became ‘Romanized’ in a new, Christianized, monoculture. The Roman empire’s multiculturalism, then, had melded into a new monoculture and Europe lost an incalculable amount of cultural diversity, including the extinction of many languages.
Modern globalism not only points to a repeat of this social phenomenon of multiculturalism leading to cultural extinctions and a new monoculture; but threatens an accelerated process in the age of the so-called ‘world-wide-web.’
It was Cicily Isabel Fairfield astutely asserted:
“There is not the smallest reason for confounding nationalism, which is the desire of a people to be itself, with imperialism, which is the desire of a people to prevent other peoples from being themselves”
What is Fairfield disentangling here? The quote is contextualized in the events leading up to, and the beginning of, World War Two, and Nazi Germany’s invasions of multiple European states. In Fairfield’s understanding, the French resistance, particularly, would be more properly defined as ‘nationalist’ (patriot), as opposed to their German occupiers, which should be more properly defined ‘imperialist.’ In the throes leading up to the war, during the propaganda events of the war itself, and especially aftermath of WWII, this German imperialism, in an etymology turned on its head, for the simple fact the Germans labeled themselves “National Socialists”, inculcated a weaponized use of the term ‘nationalist’ & ‘nationalism’ but in fact this is a perverted use of a word that should be indistinguishable from patriotism.
To drive home the point, a healthy nationalism should be indistinguishable from patriotism, inclusive of, and historically tolerant of, national minorities. On the other hand, malignant nationalism (narcissistic nationalism) can be result of social mutation of a populace under pressures that threaten their culture and/or a secure sense of well being. The Germans radically experienced this transformation, following World War One due to economic factors aggravated by the punitive terms incorporated into the Treaty of Versailles. Due to larger Western Europe’s imperial history & mentality (a legacy of Rome & Catholicism among other historical factors & actors), Germany’s ‘rebirth’ following on multiple Prussian incarnations (and let’s not forget the ethnic German Habsberg dynasty) saw malignant nationalism inevitably expressed in imperialism. Old habits die hard. Healthy conservatism or a patriotic nationalism should not be confounded with a malignant or narcissistic nationalism, particularly the malignant nationalism which becomes entangled with imperialism.
As well, today’s upsetting the demographic stability with a large influx of people with radically different cultural view can cause a healthy nationalism to morph into a localized malignant nationalism that sees tolerance erode and even vanish as social tensions rise; for instance in those many cases of large suburban areas of Europe (examples given: Stockholm, Brussels, Paris, Berlin) where radical application of Sharia law de facto rules entire neighborhoods in contravention of the host nation’s nominally required secular law. It is this erosion of authority threatens traditional, indigenous conservatism and mutates a previously more relaxed social tolerance into a social survival, instinct driven, intolerance.
In this 21st Century variation of nationalism (patriotism) pressured into becoming malignant nationalism, postmodern liberals accuse the social conservatives in this initial phase of stresses of being “Nationalist” in a weaponized sense of the word that is disingenuous. In actuality, it is the liberals are contributing towards a future & growing ‘malignancy’ with a refusal to defend their own cultural origins that reflexively demands ‘tolerance’ of what amounts to the de facto overthrow of a culture’s rule of law based order. In today’s world, it is the European mentality’s ‘liberals’ thinly concealed imperial ambitions are both; the midwife and the driver radicalizing European societies. NATO states are the imperial force creating large, displaced populations (examples given would be Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria & Ukraine, and some sub-Sahara Africa countries) and European Union policy demands absorbing millions of these (mostly) radically different cultures’ populace; with any individual EU nations’ resistance suppressed.
Victor Orban’s problem, then, isn’t only the European Union’s demand Hungary ‘integrate’ a large, culturally alien populace into a European, formerly Sufi, Muslim community being aggressively proselytized by Saudi sponsored radical, fundamentalist Wahhabism, but his problem is also the imperial ambitions of NATO. If NATO armies amount to an Imperial Rome’s 21st Century Legions, the European Union is new Imperial Rome’s administrative apparatus. Orban’s problem is, Hungary belongs to both; the legions effect and the administrative apparatus consequence, are part and parcel of the one arrangement of a new empire. Strictly speaking, any distinguishing between NATO and the EU is splitting hairs; these are not merely fraternal organizations as much as they are fully co-joined Siamese twins.
It follows, European democratic secularism, and those in Orban’s circumstance must face this, demonstrates it is little more than theoretical abstract; its supposed Greek derived, ‘enlightenment’ inspired, democratic traditions in actuality more resemble Gaius Julius Caesar’s envy over the military conquests legacy belonging to Alexander III of Macedon.
A Post-Modern Hybrid of German Imperialism & English Language
If this new Imperial Rome’s Senate is in Strasbourg, and the Imperial Legions’ headquarters are located at Brussels, the Emperor’s residence is in Berlin. Having aggressively expanded in recent decades, while projecting its own behaviors on Russia as though it believed that nation were the new Carthage, we can shortly examine Western Europe’s present imperial expansion in the Western Balkans to assess in a microcosm, the repeat of history at the macro-cosmic level.
As put forward in the essay Education & Espionage, an intelligence assessment of German intelligence agency, Bundesnachrichtendienst, conforming/subverting Serbian academia to the ‘liberal’ political stance via Germany’s Christian Democratic Union associated Konrad Adenauer Siftung at Belgrade, it is not a reach to tie this to the policy position of Ursula von der Leyen; a longtime CDU government minister moved on to EU Commission President concerning the Serbia-Kosovo so-called “Peace Highway”
“”Truly an unbelievable thing, it connects with Austria and Greece and this is truly a motor for the Serbian economy, trade and investment. This is an economic plan that is already functioning in Serbia and we truly are connecting Europe,” she said, adding that the majority of youth in Serbia deserved a greener, prosperous and digital future”
Yes, perhaps, so long as the New Rome keeps an Imperial Legion (NATO’s KFOR) in place to insinuate this infrastructure facilitates the rapid movement of modern armor (tanks, howitzers, personnel carriers) were Serbia to attempt reasserting sovereignty over the occupied Serbian majority territory in the north of Kosovo. On top of this, Saudi & Turkish funded missionary/proselytizing allowed to run amok in Kosovo are seeing the moderate Islam of the original Kosovar Muslims displaced by the aggressive & radical Wahhabism. This is no highway to peace. Oh, and about that ‘digital’ future for the youth; the world-wide-web is dominated by English, EU parliamentarians, to cross ethnic boundaries, speak in English, academics from across Europe’s national boundaries communicate in English, the many ‘international’ schools made available to today’s youth instruct in English, and international economics & business relations across Europe are conducted in English. English is the new Imperial Rome’s & future monoculture language that should see Serbian and other languages begin to vanish in not so distant future.
Then, the German Christian Democratic Union’s ‘sister’ party, Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (Bavaria was the least ‘denazified’ German state) gifts the Balkans with the extra-judicially appointed (in violation of the Dayton Accords because he is not confirmed by the UN Security Council) High Representative for Bosnia Christian Schmidt:
“[Republika Srpska’s] Presidency member Milorad Dodik’s announcement that he will talk about the peaceful disintegration of the country, as he has now begun to announce, to disband the army and have an old Republika Srpska army. I think this is the time to make it clear that the international community is not bound to get into the situations we just got into in the 1990s. There is no peaceful dissolution”
Schmidt’s language concerning the Republika Srpska is disingenuous in multiple instance; there was no use of the language “Disintegration” (Schmidt’s hyperbole), there was no language concerning “disbanding” the Bosnian army but rather having the Bosnian army depart Republika Srpska’s territory with demand any Serbian members of that military force choosing to stay with it, should depart with it; and finally, “there is no peaceful dissolution” would appear a thinly veiled threat to return the new Imperial Rome’s legions to deter the Republika Srpska’s international law founded “right to self-determination of peoples.” In fact Republika Srpska’s claim to a right of self determination, the basis underlying Milorad Dodik’s “peaceful withdrawal” announcement, is chartered in United Nations treaty law; Republika Srpska is a recognized ethnic majority political entity and therefore is entitled to exercise a right of self-determination via plebiscite. The Imperial residence at Berlin’s problem with this is, international law affords avenue to Republika Srpska’s national sovereignty and this national sovereignty is at odds with the purpose of empire. All in all, Schmidt is demonstrably a liar; there is no expressed intention in the Republika Srpska’s position to return to the violence of the 1990s, rather this threat of violence is the new Rome’s Imperial threat projected onto Republika Srpska.
Another ‘envoy’ parroting the Emperor’s residence at Berlin would be Viola von Cramon, the European Parliament’s Rapporteur for the Western Balkans, poking the European Union’s (in effect, Germany’s) nose where it clearly doesn’t belong:
”[Republika Srpska’s expressing a right to self-determination] is simply unacceptable and jeopardises all the progress that has been made in the post-war period. Bosnia and Herzegovina is still very fragile, yet complex, and we are closely monitoring the situation there, seeking a strong European response, i.e., sanctions for all those who undermine the country’s sovereignty, strengthen EUFOR on the ground and stop Croatia and Serbia from interfering in internal affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina”
What a mouthful of faux concern and threats from the German noble whose Heinrich Böll Siftung in Belgrade, mirrors the German intelligence agency habits of the Konrad Adenauer Siftung in Belgrade the reader will discover in the related essay “Education & Espionage.”
If one were to allow the ethnic Croat region to join Croatia (peacefully) and allow the ethnic Serb region to join Serbia (peacefully), there would far less opportunity for resurgence of malignant nationalism and conflict of the former time, only a remaining Bosniak entity that had welcomed al Qaida jihadis during the 90’s Balkans wars and since has exported home-grown jihadis across the several empire middle East conflicts. Whoa! The new Rome won’t want that exposed to any international microscope!! (noting France has exported by far more.) A resultant Muslim Bosniak state (presumably a moderate one) would have 3 times the population of Montenegro but this sort of ‘inclusiveness’ isn’t a welcome entity in the present Imperial design. Rather the new Rome’s brat-cum-post-modern-Teutonic-tribal-politics ‘nobility’, von Cramon, would prefer NATO’s legions be returned to Bosnia under cover of EUFOR, perpetrating an artificial multicultural state simmering with unresolved ethnic tensions.
At the end of the day, this new Rome should point to something altogether different to diversity in regards to the propaganda versus the reality; it should be exposed the new Imperial design incorporates all of the elements indicating reprise of the old Rome’s devolution are in place. It’s all there: the Imperial structures, the factors pointing to a future crumbling from within, and a developing linguistic monoculture destined to displace & drive to future extinction much of the cultural diversity the European Union so famously claims it treasures.
It is the co-joined twins European Union/NATO’s imperialism presently creates manifold cases of malignant nationalism and thusly upsets the peace of nations and perverts national patriotism, which should ultimately point to this new Rome’s own demise. This is not a fiction’s play, nevertheless, these staged actors cannot be believed even as they believe themselves.
*
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
“The idea of becoming “NSA-proof” is just silly. If they want it, they can get it” –Joseph Lorenzo Hall
“I’m going to slip up and they’re going to hack me. It’s going to happen” –Edward Snowden
All the encryption in the world isn’t going to protect, example given, a computer with a NSA, GCHQ, Unit 8200 or other intelligence agency’s undetectable keylog trojan, trust me. But first, a bit of my story and then onto how (not, actually) to leak:
When I’d exited the U.S. Army in April, 1976, I held a top secret clearance. The only documents I had taken with me were a complete record of my military 201 file. I also had (since) acquired copies of my veterans and social security files. How I’d managed copies of these are a secret, along the lines of Benjamin Franklin’s ‘three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.’ In this regard, it is worth mentioning I have held information between my ears that has never been spoken of in presence of mobile device, let alone entered into a computer or sent via any email.
Ok, so I can tell how I acquired the social security file, the social security administration fucked up and mailed me my own file. Yes, the original, which I went through with what certain people might have assumed would be great satisfaction, as supposedly I realized I was the censor who’d decide what I could see in my file. Of course I redacted or with-held nothing in my self exam, prior to sending the file on to my attorney who notified the social security administration we were (supposedly) inadvertently in possession of the file and to who should we send it to? A lady at the administration, in subsequent conversation, commented to myself something along the lines of ‘NO ONE has had the access to their file that you have had…’
But in fact this social security business was patent bs. Almost certainly the file had been deliberately sent my way, stripped of certain records (they missed pulling one critical document pointing to this), to throw me off the trail of then senators Max Baucus and Conrad Burns who both were complicit in covering up crimes at United States Forest Service offices in Montana on environmental issues, and suspects in regards to my file having been sequestered for months at the Social Security offices in Maryland while it was investigated whether I could be charged with fraud. Why? The USA appears to have left no stone unturned in efforts to take myself out of the public circulation due to my anti-corruption work of that era (1990s.) Apart from this, it was about this time I’d produced copies of records from my VA (military veteran) file after certain originals had gone missing following an ‘expert’ sent from Washington to Helena (Montana, where my VA file was kept) to ‘review’ files, kept me from charges of fraud relating to my veteran’s disability pension.
This (failed) ‘deep state’ caper in regards to attempt at trumping up felony charges intended to send me to jail and end my work, follows typical false flag spy-craft model. The people hearing the case, had it been successfully pursued, would have been innocents looking at a record they could not know (or believe) had been tampered with, to secure a conviction. My having copies of my VA file documents, saved my butt. I produced the necessary copy of a critical document at the initial hearing and the case was dismissed on the spot.
It wasn’t until I’d dug into the USA’s funding of charter schools as cover for intelligence embeds, the agencies had begun playing hardball or, that is to say, devoted resources to taking me out physically (assassination.)
Prior to this, during my stint with Special Forces, I’d the best possible education in operations and intelligence because it was not school, but OJT (on-the-job-training) with veterans of operations coordinated with CIA in Indochina and Central America. This was the best (or worst, depending on one’s perspective) avenue to knowledge in the ‘game’ of international intrigue; it was unrestricted, first hand knowledge of the dirty aspect of the business on the ground, where the intrigues hatched by criminal minds at Langley, Virginia, are played out. Suffice it to say, I departed Special Forces with a remarkable understanding of how underhanded the game of spies is played, the paramount importance of employing psychology to one’s advantage (in often devious ways), and the imperative necessity of the death of one’s conscience to be successful and survive. Having only learned about, not employed these nefarious skills, I took my conscience and ethics, intact, with me on departure, together with the remarkable tool kit I’d developed through this experience, in subsequent work as investigator. My favorite of these skills had been open source analysis, in fact in light of the avalanche of criticisms since the Snowden revelations, it has been pointed out CIA open source analysis has been more effective, by far, than any NSA program, in relation to spy-craft.
Now, applying old school spy-craft, to the point of this essay; how NOT to leak-
Since WikiLeaks had been locked out of its own leak platform we’ve had ‘OpenLeaks‘ (a flop) and since we’ve had the deceptive & falsely named, pandering to fools, so-called ‘SecureDrop‘ (remember Reality Winner?)
However ‘SecureDrop’ might have been well intended, I wouldn’t touch it with the proverbial ten-foot pole. What’s more is, I doubt you’d even need it, if you wished to leak. I’ll go into the why you wouldn’t need it first, and then why I wouldn’t touch it.
If you wished to have a secure platform to leak documented criminal activities from, as opposed to a supposedly ‘secure’ online platform to leak to, you should be able to build one yourself. And you shouldn’t need to be a computer guru to do it. The recipe is exceedingly simple:
Acquire a laptop that cannot be traced to you, from a yard sale in an unfamiliar neighborhood, example given. Park your car away from where you make the purchase. I don’t advise stealing a machine, but that’d work if you’re a competent thief and don’t leave a trail. We know the NSA has arranged to implant computers with bugged software, actual hardware in some cases, and we want a computer that it doesn’t matter if it ‘calls home’ (NSA) when certain red flags might be triggered by materials you might be handling, so onto the next paragraph.
Now, before you even fire the machine up for the first time, you kill the web-cam, a piece of paper taped over it will do just fine. And you disable the microphone and speaker with dummy jacks cut from discarded actual microphones and speakers and epoxy them in place, just to make certain they stay there. Carefully cut them off where the plug extends from the jack, so they are not obvious. Now your ‘leak platform’ is externally blind, deaf and dumb. Shut off bluetooth and search the machine for any GPS integrated software programs and disable them prior to logging on to the internet. DO NOT log into internet from your home.
Now, as to what you might be leaking, consider whether it will be tracked to you on the back-end (source.) Be assured in some environments there will be efforts to do certain things, like identify a computer that had items downloaded onto a memory stick. How will you get these materials safely into the machine you intend to leak from? Old fashioned spy-craft is something to consider, if you do not feel secure in the environment whose security you are breaching. Digital photos of actual documents can be loaded into the computer or paper documents can be scanned into your ‘leak platform’ (in which case you will want an older, untraceable scanner as well.) Use a digital camera that cannot be traced to you. You NEVER want to mail by post any documents, because certain addresses will be flagged by intelligence agencies and your package could be intercepted and might give up fingerprints and/or DNA and other information, such as a the postmark information needed to review security footage at specific locations on certain dates. Also, you’ll want clean paper documents for a scanner (particularly) or digital camera, on account of the possibility you might inadvertently scan your own or your colleagues fingerprints (use gloves when working with any paper documents.)
Ask yourself, is the material you are considering making public, of a demonstrable criminal nature? Or, does it shock the conscience in a sense of egregious violating principles of ethics? COVER YOUR ASS, BECAUSE NO MATTER THE PRECAUTIONS TAKEN, YOU MIGHT GET CAUGHT. Public opinion might save your butt, but don’t count on it, it hasn’t worked for many (if any in recent times.)
Remind yourself, there has been a dearth of leakers that have gone undetected. Has it ever crossed your mind why there has been no ‘deep throat‘ in our present era, and why it seems nearly everyone gets busted? As well, our Federalist Society majority on the USA’s ‘deep state’ owned (corporate board controlled) Supreme Court refused first amendment free press protection to journalism in the case of James Risen in a leaks case. They’ll be after you with everything at the system’s disposal and your chances are not good if you are detected at any level.
Now, you’ve decided, as a patriot, your leak is worth your liberty and/or life and you’ve convinced yourself you’ve stolen the material you wish to leak without getting caught (let’s hope you’re right) and it’s time to deliver to the journalists, undetected. Perhaps you’d wish to wait three or six months, after you’ve gotten away with the initial theft, it’d be nice if the trail grows cold. Now, your documents are loaded into file that is easy to access, for instance located on the desktop. The email addresses you wish to send the information to are handy. Now, your platform, ‘Dr Leakey’ (named for the archaeologist), is ready. You are in familiar turf (if you are confident), or you have traveled to unfamiliar territory (if you have nerves of steel.) What you need is an open wireless signal you can log onto. When you’ve found this at a cafe or a truckstop or simply a careless person in any neighborhood with unlocked wireless where you can log in from, sitting in your car parked close by (beware of cctv), log on. Create a faked email account (that you will never use again.) Send a first mail (BCC to recipients) to yourself, explaining there is a second mail following with attachments and stating if the recipient does not see the second mail, to look in their spam folder. This mail should pop up and you see it with no failed addresses (from the BCC to the people you are mailing.) Seeing you have a working address on both ends (i.e. functioning mail accounts) and are you still determined to do this, ask yourself, for real? Deep breath, new mail addressed, attached file(s), hit send, have coffee, read the paper, look at ease, normal, belonging in your environment while the what might seem like ages in time pass as the file uploads from the computer and finally the mail goes ‘whoosh’ (in your mind) and the leak is done.
Calmly go on about your day and know how you will be disposing of Dr Leakey. You used him for this one project and will never use him again. Example given, pull out the ram, hard drive goes to the incinerator (an all night campfire will do), break the screen as though Dr Leakey had been accidentally dropped & parts salvaged, and the carcass destination ends in a dumpster (leave no fingerprints.) Same fate for either the digital camera or scanner, if you used these. Be patient for results in the news. You’ve just dropped a bomb from the unseen world and any journalist worth your while, will take time to try and authenticate the information you’ve provided. If they blow it off and never pursue the lead, maybe the gods actually love you. If you’ve gotten away with it, resist temptation to ever do it again. There might be such thing as a charmed life, but it’s probably not yours.
By now, the NSA with its billions of mails to look through, will come up with (at most) someone sent a mail from an account used ONCE, from an computer they never see log in again, over some unsecured random wireless signal in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, example given. Maybe you live in this area of 13 million people or maybe you don’t. This is because you left little in the way of digital fingerprints by finding a way around taking your leak out on a memory stick. Enjoy a quiet laugh and hope you were good enough getting the material out the back-end, with a cold or faint trail, because if you did it right, they can’t track you from that end. And then erase your personal memory, the one between your ears, because you never wish to tell ANYONE, who you are, in relation to what you’ve done. Meanwhile, study technique along the lines set out by a former FBI agent in the article ‘Spy Craft for Hacks‘ but even there the deck is stacked against you with an ‘agency friendly’, very serious lie by omission; don’t ever have your cell phone (or any mobile device) along on what would then become a misadventure. You’ll need cold nerves, excellent understanding of the environment and good luck, to pull it off. Nothing suffices for this like training and even then, there is no absolute way of doing these things undetected. Luck and competence on your own part and that of your adversaries play into this as well.
Now, to why you probably don’t actually want or need to leak. Firstly, we know it is no longer a conspiracy ‘theory’ (rather conspiracy fact) the USA’s security state is behaving like nazis in relation to surveillance of its own people. We know it’s likely the corporate ‘deep state’ co-opted congress, president and courts are doing little and will do little or nothing to actually change this behavior of the MILITARY elements in control of the runaway NSA, other than at most, wring their hands for public consumption. You don’t need much more knowledge to effect change, if change is going to happen. And if change isn’t happening, what’s the point? If our society’s leading lights are merely content (at most) to shout and stamp their feet like spoiled children at what is going on, rather than shut down ‘business as usual’ along the lines of refusing this criminal hydra legitimacy and attending power, and you don’t see the tectonic plate shift in public outrage necessary to force the issue, there really is no point, people have been cowed into obedience along the lines predicted by both Orwell & Huxley. On the one hand you have Orwell’s conservative sheep bleating on behalf of the ‘security’ state over the terror propaganda all of our western world has been fed. On the other hand you have Huxley’s ‘it’s all about me’ MTV generation could care less about civil liberties beyond freedom to consume, extreme sport, sex, fashion and media ego. With corporate media feeding a public with an education one mile wide and one quarter inch deep (1.6 kilometers wide & 1/2 centimeter deep), the Billy Grahams and Hollywood (our two primary oracles of ‘god’) rule a society which has cannot be saved from itself, because you cannot get the majority’s attention long enough to explain a few sensible things that might change their focus, if not their beliefs, whether puritan or hedonistic. This reflects social engineering via media information operations.
Stepping into/out of this world in relation to spies and leaking is a very dangerous proposition for the untrained. Now is time to work with what we know, not obsess with pursing endless soap operas concerning information on criminals you exercise no real control over. And there is a reason intelligence will want you obsessing (keep reading.)
What can be clearly inferred from open source analysis is, our civil structures have become criminal, out of control, one could go so far as to simply state ‘insane.’ And this is what is distracted from, when obsessed with being outraged at the western democracies ‘voyeurism’ in relation to ‘the people’ who supposedly are in control of our future direction via the principle of ‘consent of the governed.’ The propagandists at the several corporate board controlled intelligence agencies, via co-opted western media, will work to guide and exploit this national tantrum to a (hopefully) calmed down child at the end of the day.
As to the ongoing criminal agendas, one only need look at Chevron (example given) as a corporate gangster poster child and how they’ve managed to buy congress and the courts via Federalist Society owned justices at the top, along the lines of ‘citizens united.’ As for the out of control, one only need look at how ineffective congressional oversight has been, and is presently, in regards to NSA, example given, and there is no change in sight. As for the insane, one only need look at the USA, and it’s lapdog western democracies, pushing Russia to the brink with geo-political capers recently best illustrated in Ukraine, and how western media lies to the public about what is actually going on. Left unchecked, this insanity will certainly lead to VERY BAD subsequent events.
Now, to alternative media and the so-called ‘progressive’ movement, here’s why I wouldn’t touch any online platform, despite examples such as the ‘indomitable’ Guardian subscribe to ‘SecureDrop.’
To begin with, directing leaks to electronics communications platforms is playing to the NSA’s strong point, this area of expertise is SIGINT (signals intelligence), the NSA forte. No matter the encryption expertise involved in any platform’s construction, it is an invitation to play in the lion’s den. Be assured, the NSA (not to mention GCHQ and other intelligence agencies) will assign crack teams to SecureDrop (if ‘securedrop’ were not actually designed by these.)
The Guardian (newspaper) is an organization that would be very deliberately targeted by HUMINT (human intelligence) as a matter of fact. Organizations wishing to penetrate, spy, shape dialogue & policy within the Guardian would include MOSSAD, CIA, DGSE (France) and the British intelligence agencies. Each of these agencies will have a vested interest in covert penetration of the Guardian on account of that paper not having been (yet) entirely monopolized by any one of the Western intelligence agencies (which squabble & compete among themselves.) Anything, were it sent through the pretense of a so-called secure system, is at risk of exposure to clandestine a rabbit warren designed by spies within the Guardian organization. Trust me, they’re there. MOSSAD particularly, would be interested in any information it could potentially acquire, as ‘chits’ to trade to the USA (and other nations) for political favors, as its political currency continues in steady decline over West Bank issues. Just because you possibly managed a ‘secure’ leak (in your dreams) over the SecureDrop system, does not mean you are secure, not by a long shot, because you cannot know how the material might be compromised after it has been put through, let alone whether the system itself is penetrated/designed to identify the source point of the upload and MOSSAD trades YOU in a quid pro quo with another agency.
And now to the odious (closing) aspect of this essay.
“You can imagine my surprise when I read the June 13, 1971, issue of the Sunday New York Times and saw there among the “Pentagon Papers” a number of basic information papers that had been in my own files in the Joint Chiefs of Staff area of the Pentagon. Most of the papers of that period had been source documents from which I had prepared dozens — even hundreds — of briefings, for all kinds of projects, to be given to top Pentagon officers. Not only had many of those papers been in my files, but I had either written many of them myself or had written certain of the source documents used by the men who did.
“Many people have been so concerned about what has been happening to our Government that they have dedicated themselves to investigating and exposing its evils. Unfortunately, a number of these writers have been dupes of those cleverer than they or with sinister reasons for concealing knowledge. They have written what they thought was the truth, only to find out (if they ever did find out) that they had been fed a lot of contrived cover stories and just plain hogwash
“In the hands of Allen Dulles, “secrecy” was simply a chameleon device to be used as he saw fit and to be applied to lesser men according to his schemes. It is quite fantastic to find people like Daniel Ellsberg being charged with leaking official secrets simply because the label on the piece of paper said “TOP SECRET,” when the substance of many of the words written on those same papers was patently untrue and no more than a cover story. Except for the fact that they were official “lies”, these papers had no basis in fact, and therefore no basis to be graded TOP SECRET or any other degree of classification
“Any reader of the “Pentagon Papers” should be warned that although they were commissioned on June 17, 1967, by the Secretary of Defense as “the history of United States involvement in Vietnam from World War II [Sept 2, 1945] to the present” [1968], they are unreliable, inaccurate and marred by serious omissions. They are a contrived history, at best, even though they were written by a selected Task Force under Pentagon leadership” -Pentagon liaison to the CIA, L. Fletcher Prouty
In fact the so-called ‘Pentagon Papers’ were intended to deflect attention from the CIA and onto the military, concerning policy failures in Vietnam.
Open source analysis profiles (STRONGLY) Daniel Ellsberg as an intelligence agency officer, almost certainly CIA. What the CIA edits at wikipedia doesn’t inform of, when the public is fed…
“Ellsberg served in the Pentagon from August 1964 under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (and, in fact, was on duty on the evening of the Gulf of Tonkin incident, reporting the incident to McNamara). He then served for two years in Vietnam working for General Edward Lansdale as a civilian in the State Department”
…is Ellsberg’s work for Edward Lansdale at Department of State has CIA information operations written all over it. One of CIA’s big tasks is information operations or social engineering via psychological manipulation of entire populations. And Ellsberg was working with one of the CIA’s true big shots in this area of intelligence expertise. The ultimate purpose of the ‘Pentagon Papers’ leak was information operations (social engineering) to shield the CIA from public accountability for the massive intelligence & related policy failures in Vietnam; by shifting public focus onto the Pentagon. The CIA was expendable and could have been disbanded. The Pentagon could not be done away with.
“That I had written parts of some of them proves that they were not genuine Pentagon papers, because my work at that time was devoted to support of the CIA” -L Fletcher Prouty
Colonel Prouty blew the whistle on the CIA & Ellsberg over 40 years ago. Colonel Prouty’s work, which has borne the test of time, is buried, meanwhile, whistle-blower ‘legend’ Ellsberg invites leakers into the SecureDrop cobra’s lair… as you actually believe the initial SecureDrop developer, Aaron Schwartz, hanged himself (and his co-developer’ ‘died’ after that.) Probably, it’s a case of, examples given, Gary Webb shot himself in the headTWICE (Superman could do that.) It’s an old model, for instance when Eli Black had stepped into longtime CIA turf at United Fruit, he was framed with an SEC investigation and a subsequently ‘depressed’ Eli broke an industrial strength skyscraper window with his briefcase and ‘jumped’ 44 floors from his office building. No-no, the CIA liaised generals at NSA won’t be allowing certain activities to move forward unimpeded. The only question with ‘SecureDrop’ is, how it has been compromised (since inception or when the source code was stolen, likely about the time Schwartz ‘hanged’ himself.)
Daniel Ellsberg has been a champion of WikiLeaks which has employed SecureDrop via tor (tor is a USA military intelligence tool.)
Ellsberg has promoted SecureDrop for Exposefacts.org.
Has it ever occurred to anyone, as to why, no one has ever outed a ‘Kim Philby‘ type character embedded in the progressive and peace movements, as though intelligence operatives would never caper within that playground? I’ll name you one. Daniel Ellsberg.
“From the beginning, the Pentagon Papers were a compilation of documents designed to paint President John F. Kennedy as the villain of the story, and to shield the role of the CIA” –L Fletcher Prouty
Meanwhile, so-called ‘SecureDrop’ has been leaking the leakers identities for years.
This is a majorly rewritten, updated & re-titled piece from 2014 –
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Probably the first US-plotted “colour revolution” was the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893. The Hawaiian Islands had been united in the early 1800s and were internationally recognised as an independent country, but the native Polynesians had been outnumbered by outsiders who had acquired a good deal of the land and devoted it to growing sugar. The USA was the principal market for the sugar but, when domestic sugar producers prevailed upon Washington to impose a tariff, the producers in Hawaii saw their wealth threatened. The coup overthrew the Queen, proclaimed a republic and a few years later Hawaii became a US territory and the sugar market was saved. None of this was overtly stated in justification, of course: the coup, like later “colour revolutions”, was carried out for more highfalutin reasons than mere greed. A threat was “discovered”, “public safety is menaced, lives and property are in peril”, a committee of safety formed, simulated mass meetings were held. Conveniently a US Navy ship was in harbour and troops came ashore “to secure the safety” etc etc. The Navy’s presence was not a coincidence because the US President and Secretary of State were in agreement with the conspiracy and the US diplomatic representative, while pretending neutrality, was an active participant. All done quickly and the coup leaders proclaimed themselves to be the new provisional government. Wholly and obviously fake – there was no disorder at all and the “committee of public safety” was made up of sugar barons and their flunkeys – but it stands as a historically significant event because it was the first crude attempt at something to be perfected in later years.
A Congressional report in 1894 decided that everything was perfectly perfect but a century later the US Congress passed the “apology resolution” for the coup. Who can say that the Rules-Based International Order is not real after that? Has Putin or Xi ever apologised for anything he didn’t apologise for earlier?
The most recent successful “colour revolution” occurred in Ukraine in 2013-2014. Enter the “Non-Government” Organisations – the non-government part is a lie but they are certainly well organised; they prepare the way. Victoria Nuland, then Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, admitted to spending five billion dollars to “ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine”: an enormous sum for a poor country. (One learns here what has changed since the Hawaiian “colour revolution” 120 years before: 1) the rhetoric is more syrupy 2) it costs more.) She was the John Stevens of the Ukrainian “colour revolution” – sent by the US State Department to hand out the money, make the decisions and direct the performance. And, as the phone intercept proves, to block others from involvement – “fuck the EU”.) I recommend taking the time to listen to some of Nuland’s speech here to see just how sugary the cover talk for these “colour revolutions” has become – democracy, human rights, freedom, reforms, Europe; the caravan of “Western values” is chained to the juggernaut of greed and power. None of these formerly estimable values are visible in today’s Ukraine; but the interests of Ukrainians (or Hawaiians) were never the point of “colour revolutions”: the sugar barons wanted to keep their entry into the US market, Washington wanted to make trouble for Russia and the US Navy wanted a base in Crimea.
But the day of “colour revolution” seems to be running out. The mechanics are noticed and countered. Observe, for example, the moment in this video of a protest in Sevastopol when the commenter – who had seen it before on the Maidan – points out the carefully spaced people, wearing red so they can recognise each other, directing the supposedly genuine and spontaneous protest. The organisers were trying to make the Crimean Tatar issue a fighting cause. (I wonder, by the way, how many consumers of the Western “news” media think the Tatars are autochthonous?) I well remember this documentary because it was the first time I saw the people on the receiving end of a “colour revolution” getting ahead of the organisers; up to this moment they had been reacting, always wrongly and too late. But many of the security forces in Crimea in 2014 had been on the Maidan and had ample opportunity to observe how “spontaneity” is organised.
The authorities and their security services are becoming proactive and are using social media – a good example was the recording of the organisers of the Hong Kong protests meeting with a US Embassy official. And we have the recording of one of Navalniy’s associates asking for money from a UK Embassy official; not, he assured the official, “a big amount of money for people who have billions at stake”. Sometimes it’s fortuitous and not the result of planning by the target’s security services. A civil airliner receives a (fake) bomb threat, it lands according to the rules, one of the passengers is a “colour revolution” operative, they arrest him, he sings. There is still some mystery in the Protasevich story, but the Western version is certainly not true.
And when it’s over and failed, Washington casually dismisses its tools. Where is Yushchenko today? Once the darling of the “Orange Revolution” in Kiev, today he is a non-person. Saakashvili, re-used and failed again in Ukraine, is in prison in Tbilisi today. No fuss is made about him. Áñez is in jail, Protasevich forgotten. We’ve seen many West-leaning democratic saviours come and go in Russia – Berezovskiy, Khodorkovskiy and Pussy Riot are in the past; today it’s Navalniy but he’s probably passed his best-before date. Just props in the “colour revolution” theatre.
And we come to another secret of beating the “colour revolution” – tough it out. The Emperor Alexander told the French Ambassador that Napoleon’s enemies had given up too soon, he, on the other hand, would go to Kamchatka if need be. He went to Paris instead. Maduro still sits in the presidential office in Caracas, Guaidó is reduced to begging; Brussels has stopped pretending but Washington holds fast to the delusion. Lukashenka remains. Beijing toughed it out in Hong Kong. On the contrary, in Georgia (“Rose Revolution“) Shevardnadze was unwilling to use force and in Kiev (“Orange Revolution” and Maidan) Yanukovych was unwilling to use force. Not, of course that they weren’t blamed anyway by the Western propaganda apparatus (which was unashamed to call these scenes in Kiev and Hong Kong “peaceful” and never wondered where all the orange tents came from). All designed of course, to incite a violent reaction by the authorities which would be packaged by the complaisant Western media as violence against peaceful protesters. Not at all the same thing, of course, in the Western “human rights” Rules-Based International Order construction, as anything going on in Melbourne, or Paris, or London. To a degree, “colour revolutions” are waiting games and the incumbent, if he keeps his nerve, has certain advantages.
Former successes – in recent times, Ukraine twice, Georgia – are becoming failures: Hong Kong, Venezuela and Belarus. The targets have learned how to counter the attacks. The essential rules for defeating “colour revolutions” are:
They come from outside. So cut out the outsiders and get rid of the foreign “Non-Government” Organisations. This is probably the most important preventative: the “colour revolution” operators were quite unhindered in, for example, Ukraine.
Remember Alexander’s advice: don’t give up too soon. Maduro and Lukashenka are still there. To say nothing of Russia, China and Iran.
Don’t be afraid that you’ll be blamed: you will be anyway. The Western propaganda machine is not interested in facts.
Be tough. There’s a rhythm to these things; if you interrupt them, its hard for them to get back on track.
Be patient, as we saw in Hong Kong, the outrage is mostly artificial and will run out of steam.
Learn the techniques of how they’re done, watch for them and counter them.
And finally: time is on your side. The West is not getting stronger. What the neocons call “the axis of revisionists” is.
Cowardice is a form of corruption that is pervasive in politics, and is essentially a product of collective-centralized, ego-driven narcissism that fears loss of power. When political cowardice drives media lies, this corruption of the state opens avenue to enhanced sense of false reality and results in social-psychological split that ultimately must widen the gulf between the politicians and the people they proselytize. This systemic corruption, typical of modern states, is worst in the Western liberal democracies (the Bernays model of pervasive lies) but is also becoming a primary evil of the Russian state. [1]
Altogether setting aside the personalities of Navalny et al, who’re actually Western agents of influence (follow the money), and not Russian patriots, we can turn our sights on Yeltsen era apparachik Alexei Gromov, the contemporary Kremlin comptroller of Russian media, and his primary minion promoting media lies for external propaganda, boss of RT & Sputnk International, the succubus extraordinaire Margarita Simonyan who practically performs political fellatio on the Western propaganda model she contests with. The media cowardice subject to the present composition is that of ‘the flip’ Russian propaganda method, preferred when truth is inconvenient; in the Sputnik International article “Bizarre Conspiracy Theories That Have Haunted 9/11 Attacks for Two Decades” [2], [3], [4], [5]
“The official ruling was disputed by The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911T) – activists related to the notorious 9/11 Truth movement that refuse to accept the official version of the events. According to the activists, the WTC-7 collapse was a “near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building”. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found, however, that the columns’ failures were triggered when joists and beams “walked off” their connections”
The bold in this above excerpted paragraph is subject to an egregious lie by omission; in fact the quote attributed to “activists” is an unattributed (by Sputnik) plagiarism put on the “activists” lips. The actual source of the quote? The Institute of Northern Engineering, a fully accredited department of the University of Alaska:
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building” [6]
The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who FUNDED the (four years) university study happen to be more than 3,000 (three thousand plus) certified architects and engineers, and over three thousand trained professionals arriving at a consensus in their area of expertise cannot be (honestly) described as some notorious fringe conspiracy group. [7]
In short, what Gromov & Simoyan have done, in this example case of the scandalous articles at Sputnik on the 2021 anniversary of 9/11, is promote exceedingly dishonest yellow journalism (noting ‘yellow’ is a synonym for cowardice in American dialect) that reduces 3,000+ engineering professionals to a group of fringe conspiracy freaks where in the Sputnik storyline a fully accredited four year university study result is plagiarized and put on the disingenuously described but highly professional group’s lips as though the study had never happened (made the study vanish with ‘yellow journalism’ magic.)
“Yellow journalism and yellow press are American terms for journalism and associated newspapers that present little or no legitimate, well-researched news while instead using eye-catching headlines for increased sales. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering, or sensationalism” Wikipedia [8]
The “What About Building 7?” section then goes on to use an old, tried and true psychological operations trick; when associating the ‘jet fuel’ fires of the twin towers with Building 7, an out of context claim conflating the NIST assertions concerning the temperature of fires of the twin towers with Building 7, although the fires in Building 7 were a different (no jet fuel) circumstance. The devious construction of this ‘error’ indicates disinformation specialists assigned to the story’s composition.
Motive: Gromov & Simoyan’s pet propaganda projects RT & Sputnik have a vested self-interest in perpetrating the 9/11 lie; because 9/11 truth is a red line they dare not cross for the fact their journalists and broadcast rights likely would become persona non grata in the Western liberal democracies if they were to expose Dick Cheney’s Reichstag Fire. [9]
Yes, folks, Russia’s premier news outlets DO lie and when they do, the lies are cowardice driven ‘whoppers’ (really big lies.)
Methinks Vladimir Putin should be (someday) ungrateful for Gromov & Simonyan’s efforts; because this flip ‘judo in media’ mentality never seems to leave the dojo and face the reality of the street fight; where the ‘truth’ of winners & losers is unambiguous. You can’t lie (or bluff) your way through the big issues as a matter of habit and expect to win.
“You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time” -American folk proverb
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
“There’s something the agency, it’s so interesting, people call it, the newspapers some times call it in a story, eyewash .. it’s when you do something, and you have to protect the source, [in the case of the CIA] you let other people in the agency think that they were responsible for certain actions. So, you’ve got people down in the bowels, intelligence people in the intelligence office, analysts in the analysts office of the CIA, writing, looking at couriers, and they’ve been doing it for years without much luck, but you now tell them ‘you did it guys’ .. and then they can be taken out to reporters and be very credible, because they are credible, they think they did it” -Seymour Hersh
I am certainly no fan of the Saudis, no matter I can appreciate Sunni Islam (when it is Sufi, but certainly not the Saudi brand that is the radical Wahabi/Salafi), and, truth should not take sides in reporting, no matter the Saudi regime is brutal by any civilized standard. With that said, we’ve been here before, for instance the Saudis having to swallow being framed up for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. [1]
Now, what we are about to experience, with the 9/11 documents release, is possibly a frame-up of the Saudis that resembles Hersh’s observation; in a case where ‘eyewash’ could insure the Saudis will become a patsy for 9/11. In the alternative, there will be a whitewash rehabilitating the Saudi government (the truth will lie in a grey area somewhere between, with Saudi elements played into a false flag entrapment.)
“A central question has been the role of the Saudi government, which has denied any involvement in the attacks” [2]
The ‘declassified documents’ could essentially read ‘Great job, FBI, you did it! You sorted it out!! The Saudi Government (or elements therein) was behind 9/11!!!’ And the media will trot out FBI agents that worked on 9/11 related investigations and actually believe the Saudis did it (or believe people closely connected to the Saudi government were complicit.) But either way, actually the Saudis did not, could not be responsible for the attack, when a major university engineering study determines WTC Building 7 ‘died of fright’ (points to professional demolition) on 9/11.
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building”
The first (only) university study, four years in the making, demonstrating a “global failure” with the characteristic of “near-simultaneous failure” of every structural column in World Trade Center Building 7 points to one conclusion: A controlled demolition because the only earthquake in New York City on 9/11 was the lie of who did it and how it happened. Read the study’s conclusions for yourself. [3]
Excuse me, but World Trade Center Building 7, a 47 floor, modern concrete and steel structure, was not hit by a plane when it fell into its own footprint on 9/11 and 19 Arabs with box-cutters could not bring it down, no matter their connections to Saudi government personas and intelligence agencies. Likely what actually happened was, there WERE some Saudi government connected guys, training while planning to fly SMALL PLANES into some symbolic targets and this entrapment was created and manipulated along the lines of the infamous COINTELPRO by intelligence agencies who then ‘hijacked’ the plan for propaganda purposes; when 19 Arabs ended up ‘holding the bag’ for way bigger guys with a much bigger plan; in effect initiating what would become the Dick Cheney staging of America’s Reichstag Fire. [4]
Updated on 12 September 2021, reflecting the USA’s DoJ appears to be pursuing a dishonest line when proclaiming the ‘Saudi government didn’t do it’ with the initial document release, which is technically correct but, the avenue to go there will be (already is) misleading and covers the actual perpetrators tracks. The USA official line will not deviate from the ’19 Arabs with box-cutters.’ So, where do those infamous “28 Pages” (of misdirection) stand now? Nothing really changes. [5]
Stay tuned as the official bs propaganda exercise develops.
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Nakon dve godine sedenja na pismima Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, došlo je vreme za delovanje; s obzirom na to da je nemački ambasador u Srbiji u aprilu 2021. godine izneo neke primedbe, koje je primetio zapadni korporativni medijski front:
^ Fond braće Rokfeler dodeljuje kancelariji Balkanske mreže za istraživačko izveštavanje [BIRN] u Prištini, u proseku 100.000 USD godišnje, što je samo jedan od izvora sredstava koji BIRN prikuplja iz zapadnih korporativnih velikaša [1]
Dakle, šta je nemački ambasadorski glupan imao da kaže? Uprkos tome što nije bilo zakonskog ovlašćenja Ujedinjenih nacija za NATO bombardovanje Srbije, odluka o bombardovanju Srbije…
„je morala biti doneta da bi se sprečila humanitarna katastrofa“ [2]
… ha. Ne pominje se nedavno spremanje kosovskih lidera na suđenja za ratne zločine? Oh, a šta je sa onim „ljudima“ iz BND (nemačka CIA) koji koriste Konrad Adenauer Siftung kao paravan za obuku i postavljanje neonacističkih fašista u Ukrajini? Da li ste se ikad zapitali šta bi mogli da rade u Beogradu? [3], [4]
Ne moramo putovati kroz vreme, u rane i srednje 1940-e, da bismo razumeli da „Deutschland über Alles“ u očima određenih susednih zemalja Nemačke treba gledati malo drugačije nego što bi većina današnjih običnih nemačkih smrtnika mogla pomisliti. Ali, nemački ambasador u Srbiji, Tomas Šib, nije običan nemački smrtnik, on predsedava lokacijom čiji je centar nemačkog BND (koji potiče od organizacije Gelen) u Beogradu.
U međuvremenu, pogledajmo pismo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda (prvobitni demanti) u vezi sa nekim vrlo gadnim postupcima nemačke države; to je „pranje“ ratnog zločina pod lažnom zastavom, koji je rezultirao smrću više od 1000 sirijskih civila (nastavite da čitate, predstavljeni su svi potrebni konteksti i dokazi).
Obratite pažnju na datume pisma; Međunarodni krivični sud (dalje u tekstu: ICC) je 4. jula 2018. primio žalbu, 6. februara 2019. je datum kada je ICC porekao da ima nadležnost za istragu. Ovo nije bio brz odgovor, sedam meseci ukazuje, ako ne na samoanalizu, onda barem na neko prilično vreme u razmišljanju o neophodnom okolišenju kako da se izbegne suočavanje sa izobiljem informacija iznetih pred sud. Osporio sam ovo poricanje komunikacijom (objavljenom onlajn) koja ukazuje na istoriju ICC, podložnoj neprikladnim uticajima i zahtevom da se oni preispitaju. [5]
Prvo pismo je generičko poricanje, drugo pismo je uvijeno, kako bi se objasnilo da sud smatra da su neki „ozbiljni navodi“ izvan njegovog dometa istrage:
Kada je sam Međunarodni krivični sud [ICC] saučesnik u prikrivanju ratnih zločina od strane nemačkih državnih aktera u 21. veku, svi na vrhu bi trebalo ponešto da objasne. Ukratko, ono što sledi je da postoji mnoštvo dokaza prima facie [latinski izraz: „na prvi pogled“] da je nemačka obaveštajna služba „pomagala i podržavala“ [asistirala] u prikrivanju pod lažnom zastavom hemijske napade u Siriji, uključujući i zloglasni (posebno ubilački) gasni napad sarinom na Gutu, Sirija, u avgustu 2013. godine. Ove informacije su dostavljene nemačkim parlamentarcima, kao i Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu. Nemci su ćutali, a Međunarodni krivični sud protestuje i izjavljuje da nije nadležan, prema drugom pismu:
„Tužilaštvo je pažljivo ispitalo vašu poslednju komunikaciju. Sa žaljenjem Vas obaveštavam da je tužilac potvrdio da komunikacija ne donosi nove činjenice ili dokaze koji bi promenili prethodnu odluku da ne postoji osnova za postupanje po Rimskom statutu. Prema Rimskom statutu, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo nad genocidom, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima, kako je definisano u Rimskom statutu (Članovi 6 do 8), ako su počinjeni 1. jula 2002. godine ili kasnije (Član 11).Pored toga, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo za takva krivična dela počinjena na teritoriji države koja je prihvatila nadležnost Suda ili od strane državljanina te države (Član 12), ili kada Savet bezbednosti upućuje situaciju na Sud (Član 13). U svetlu ovih zahteva, čini se da se Vaša komunikacija, nakon pažljivog preispitivanja, i dalje odnosi na pitanja van nadležnosti Suda.
„Nadam se da ćete uvažiti da su definisanom jurisdikcijom Suda mnogi ozbiljni navodi izvan dosega ove institucije. Zahvalni smo na vašem stalnom interesovanju za Međunarodni krivični sud.“
ICC očigledno nije u pravu. I kukavički je i korumpiran. Nemačka je potpisnica ICC-a, a krivično delo pomaganja i podržavanja (prikrivanje pod lažnom zastavom) nesumnjivo ima svoje polazište u nemačkoj državi. ICC, da bi izbegao ovo (uprkos priznanju „ozbiljnih navoda“), čini se da usko definiše nadležnost (ograničavajući primenljive optužbe) za zločin počinjen u Siriji (i na taj način izbegava optužbu za pomaganje i podržavanje) i zbog toga radije negira nadležnost nego da uzburka obaveštajnu službu Nemačke (Bundesnachrichtendienst ili BND) i mezimce Angele Merkel.
Pitanje koje se postavlja u filozofiji prava je, da li sam ICC postaje saučesnik u pomaganju i podržavanju [asistiranju] navodnom prikrivanju operacije pod lažnom zastavom, očigledno namernim „uskim“ čitanjem međunarodnog prava i očigledno kukavičkim izbegavanjem da istraže krupan ratni zločin? Čini mi se, da:
Evo same žalbe, praćene mojom komunikacijom sa ICC-om koja je dovela do podnošenja prve žalbe:
Poštovano tužilaštvo pri Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu
Hvala vam na pozivu da formalizujem moju žalbu u vezi sa zločinom gasnog napada sarinom na Gutu, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.
I
Prema običajnom međunarodnom pravu, pomaganje i podržavanje ratnih zločina uključuje tri elementa:
(1) Glavno lice ili entitet počinio je ratni zločin;
(2) Drugi akter počinio je delo koje je imalo značajan efekat na izvršenje osnovnog dela; i
(3) Potrebno mentalno stanje: Drugi akter je znao da će takvo delo pomoći ili je postojala značajna verovatnoća da će pomoći izvršenju osnovnog dela.
1) Turska, država pripadnica NATO-a, preko svoje obaveštajne agencije MIT, urotila se sa al-Kaidom (predloženom tajnom članicom NATO-a) da počini ratni zločin, to jest (lažna zastava) gasni napad i usmrćivanje više od hiljadu civila u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.
2) Službenici NATO aktera Nemačke, potpisnice Rimskog statuta, pružili su „pokriće“ propagandom i drugim, srodnim sredstvima (npr. „pranje“ lažnih informacija medijima putem parlamentarnog nadzora) omogućavajući stvarnim počiniocima da pobegnu kontroli, iako su nemački obaveštajci znali:
3) Takva radnja (prethodno pomenuta) u velikoj meri bi pomogla izvršenju navedenog zločina ili drugim rečima, omogućila nekažnjivost lažnih zastava.
Članovi 49/50/129/146 četiri Ženevske konvencije (1949) nalažu državama članicama da kazneno gone i kazne sva „lica“ koja čine teška kršenja (Ambos [2014] 146). Shodno tome, Elementi zločina Statuta ICC-a ne sadrže izričitu napomenu za kategoriju počinilaca, jer tokom pregovora na Rimskoj konferenciji nije bilo neslaganja da ratne zločine mogu počiniti i pripadnici oružanih snaga i civili (Dorman, Elementi ratnih zločina [2003] 391).
Prelazeći na neposredno prethodni (III), ovaj podnosilac predstavke Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu (Ronald Tomas Vest) drži da je osobama u bilo kojoj vladi, potpisnici Rimskog statuta, zabranjeno da pomažu i podržavaju ratni zločin ili zločin protiv čovečnosti bez obzira na zločin van nadležnosti sudova (država koja nije potpisnica) kada je pomaganje i podržavanje izvršeno u nadležnosti sudova (država potpisnica). To bi uključivalo zaposlene u obaveštajnim agencijama zapadnih demokratija i političare iz njihovih redova, koji pružaju pokriće počiniocima ratnih zločina i zločina protiv čovečnosti .
Imenovana lica nemačke savezne službe bezbednosti i odgovorni političari (Bundesnachrichtendienst) koji su proaktivno (pružali lažne informacije) ili pasivno (dozvoljavali lažne podatke) namerno pomagali i podržavali stvarne počinioce (turski MIT u partnerstvu sa al-Kaidom) (pod lažnom zastavom) gasni napad na Gutu, u Siriji u avgustu 2013. godine uključuje (ali nije ograničen na) bivšeg predsednika BND Gerharda Šindlera, sadašnjeg predsednika BND Bruna Kala, Helge Brauna (ministra nadzora) i Angelu Merkel.
Imenovane osobe koje rukovode nemačkom kancelarijom saveznog tužioca, (Generalbundesanwalt/Generalbundesanwältin) a koje nisu izvršile istraživanje i procesuiranje na domaćem i međunarodnom planu (univerzalna nadležnost za ratne zločine ili Völkerstrafgesetzbuch) su Harald Range i Peter Frank.
Imenovani nemački parlamentarci (rukovodstvo i/ili stariji članovi) koji poseduju (barem od decembra 2015. godine) oslobađajuće dokaze koji oslobađaju predsednika Bašara al Asada i njegove zvaničnike i vojsku zbog napada sarinom u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine i nisu preduzeli odgovarajuće mere da nemačku obaveštajnu službu i/ili nemačke političke aktere pokore utvrđenim činjenicama prema međunarodnom pravu i, shodno tome, zaštitili su NATO aktera i njihove partnere u al-Kaidi od svetlosti, kao što su stvarni počinioci (ali ne ograničeno na) Hans-Kristijan Stroebele, Ula Jelpke, Irene Mihalic, Mihael Hartman, Armin Šuster, Norbert Lamert, Peter Hince, Johanes Singhamer, Edelgard Bulman, Ursula Šmit, Petra Pau, Klaudija Rot, Marieluise Bek, Omid Nuripur, Stefan Libih, Nils Anen, Roderih Kizeveter i Gregor Gisi.
Da bi kontekstualizovali dugu naviku zapadnih obaveštajnih agencija koje sponzorišu i/ili pomažu i podržavaju terorizam lažne zastave, preporučuje se tužilac ICC-a da pregleda istoriju GLADIO-a:
Radi šireg razumevanja osnovne ili utemeljujuće kriminalne prirode / porekla nemačkog Bundesnachrichtendienst-a, preporučuje se da tužilac ICC-a pregleda poreklo i istoriju BND-a iz organizacije Gelen:
Da bi se razumelo da nemački zvaničnici koji su trenutno na vlasti i dalje igraju podmuklo u sadašnjoj geopolitičkoj eri, daju se sledeće informacije:
Kontekstualizujući odnos obaveštajnih agencija država NATO-a (uključujući Nemačku, potpisnicu Rimskog statuta) prema hemijskim zločinima al-Kaide u Siriji, preporučuje se tužiocu ICC-a da ispita novinarstvo Vanese Belei u vezi s takozvanim Belim šlemovima:
Podržavajući izjavu turskog poslanika Erena Erdema da su „pobunjeničke“ (al-Kaida) hemikalije dopremljene iz Evrope, je ruska vojna obaveštajna služba:
Zapadne obaveštajne agencije imaju dugu istoriju nepoštene igre (kriminalne aktivnosti). U slučaju da je nemačka BND pomagala i podržavala Al-Kaidu u Siriji, postoje snažni dokazi prima facie o namernom „pranju“ lažnih informacija putem obaveštajnih podataka Saveznog nemačkog parlamenta (Bundestag) nadzorni odbor za medije koji izvršavaju prikrivanje (prikrivanje stvarnih počinilaca) ratnog zločina koji uključuje gas sarin, prema originalnim informacijama dostavljenim ICC-u sa izmenama i dopunama:
Šta se može znati naspram onoga što će se znati
Verovatno je samo pitanje vremena kada će CIA urednici na Vikipediji promeniti nedavno ažurirane informacije u gorenavedenom (kropovanom uvećanom screenshot-u) Vikipedijinom članku poslednji put ažuriranom 4. aprila 2018:
„Erdem takođe tvrdi da je sarin-gas transportovan kroz Tursku u Siriju, kasnije korišćen u hemijskom napadu na Gutu 2013. godine,kao i kasniji napadi ISIL-a na civile.Erdem je pred parlamentom pokazao slučaj gde su vođene istrage koje su dovele do hapšenja 13 potencijalnih turskih pripadnika ISIL-a, ali se kasnije neobjašnjivo od njih odustalo.
„Erdem se u Turskoj suočava sa optužbama za izdaju zbog svojih objava.“
Šta je zvanično izjavio turski član parlamenta Eren Erdem? Govoreći o kopiji (koju ima u svom posedu) krivičnog predmeta tužioca Adane 2013/120, koji su poništili Erdoganovi ljudi:
„U ovoj optužnici postoje podaci. Materijali za hemijsko oružje dovoze se u Tursku i sastavljaju u Siriji u logorima ISIS-a koji je u to vreme bio poznat kao iračka Al Kaida.
Sve ovo je otkriveno. Postoje snimci telefonskih razgovora o ovom transportovanju, poput „ne brinite o granici, mi ćemo se pobrinuti za to“, a takođe vidimo i da se koristi birokratija.
U vezi sa pošiljkom, republički tužilac u Adani, Mehmet Arıkan, izveo je operaciju i ljudi koji su umešani su zadržani. Ali, koliko razumem, on nije bio uticajna osoba u birokratiji. Nedelju dana nakon toga, imenovan je još jedan javni tužilac, preuzeo je optužnicu i svi pritvorenici su pušteni. I napustili su Tursku prelazeći sirijsku granicu.
Snimci telefonskih razgovora u optužnici pokazali su sve detalje, od načina na koji će pošiljka prevesti do toga kako će biti pripremljena, od sadržaja laboratorija do izvora materijala. Koji kamioni će se koristiti, svi datumi itd. Od A do Ž, o svemu se razgovaralo i snimalo. Uprkos svim ovim dokazima, osumnjičeni su pušteni.
I pošiljka se dogodila, jer ih niko nije zaustavio. Zbog toga je možda rezultat toga sarin koji je korišćen u Siriji.
Kada sam pročitao optužnicu, jasno sam video da ti ljudi imaju veze sa Turskim Institutom za mašinsku i hemijsku industriju i da nimalo ne brinu oko prelaska granice.
Na primer, u telefonskim zapisima Hajama Kasapa, mnogo puta ga čujete kako govori sarin gas, govoreći da su ateljei spremni za proizvodnju, materijal čeka u kamionima koji navodno voze gaziranu sodu.
Na primer, hemijski napad u Guti. Zapamtite. Tvrdilo se da iza toga stoje režimske snage. Ovaj napad izveden je samo nekoliko dana pre operacije sarinom u Turskoj.
Velika je verovatnoća da je ovaj napad izveden sa onim osnovnim materijalom koji je isporučen kroz Tursku. Kaže se da su režimske snage odgovorne, ali optužnica kaže da je to ISIS. Inspektori UN-a su otišli na lokaciju, ali nisu uspeli da pronađu nikakve dokaze. Ali u ovoj optužnici smo pronašli dokaze. Znamo ko je koristio gas sarin, a zna to i naša vlada.
Svi osnovni materijali kupuju se iz Evrope. Zapadne institucije treba da se preispitaju o tim odnosima. Zapadni izvori vrlo dobro znaju ko je izvršio gasni napad sarinom u Siriji. Oni znaju ove ljude, znaju sa kim ti ljudi rade, znaju da ti ljudi rade za Al-Kaidu. Mislim da su zapadnjaci licemerni po pitanju ove situacije.“
Šta se još može znati?
1) Rukovodstvo nemačkog parlamenta (sve političke stranke), kao i nemački savezni tužilac su obavešteni 2. decembra 2015. godine, od strane iskreno Vašeg:
Poštovani poslanici nemačkog parlamenta
Želim da skrenem pažnju na nedavne informacije u vezi sa vašim saveznikom u NATO-u,Turskom. Prošlog meseca su dva hrabra člana turskog parlamenta otkrila da u stvari iza turskih saveznih obaveštajnih službi stoje gasni napad sarinom u avgustu 2013. godine, ubivši više od hiljadu običnih Sirijaca, napad za koji su NATO države okrivile režim Bašera al-Assad. Vaš vlastiti Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) trebalo je da bude svestan ove činjenice od skoro samog početka, jer su proaktivno angažovani u Siriji i sirijskom sukobu, kao i špijunirajući Tursku.
Štaviše, državni akter Turska, koja je pokrenula napad sarinom nije neka nedokumentovana optužba. Kao što vidite iz priloženog izveštaja, turske vlasti su sprovele odgovarajuću istragu sa razvijenim dokazima i optužnicama. Žao mi je što vas obaveštavam da je, u ovom slučaju, predsednik Erdogan lično pokrenuo tužilaštvo koje se prošle nedelje pobrinulo da urednik novinskih izveštaja završi u zatvoru.
Ovo postavlja snažna pitanja o mogućem krivičnom saučesništvu BND-a, s obzirom na podršku Nemačke određenim NATO državama direktno u vezi sa sirijskim sukobom. Šta je BND znao i kada? Da li je BND, prenoseći Asadovoj opoziciji, preko svojih NATO saveznika, obaveštajne podatke o Siriji, podržao aktere koji su izvršili gasni napad na Sirijce? Da li je odnos Nemačke koja podržava vladu Erdogana zakonit, u svetlu ovih dokaza? Da li je BND doprineo geopolitičkim dezinformacijama koje Asada krive za napad sarinom iz avgusta 2013. godine? Da li je vaš parlament prevaren u ovom pitanju, posebno vaš odbor za nadzor obaveštajnih službi?
Jasno je da bi slučaj Sarin, uzevši u obzir Nemačku, kao upućenog aktera ili saučesnika u Siriji, trebalo voditi protiv Turske putem pravnog mehanizma Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, kao i domaće tužbe tih nemačkih zvaničnika, posebno napominjući BND, koji je omanuo u izveštavanju i/ili se urotio u zaveru radi prikrivanja ratnog zločina ili zločina protiv čovečnosti.
To bi trebalo da budu pitanja i zahtevi koje ćete predstaviti saveznom tužiocu.
Ron Vest
2) Nemačka obaveštajna služba (BND) lagala je odboru za nadzor rada obaveštajne službe nemačkog parlamenta:
(Preveden, obeležen tekst) „Berlin – Federalna obaveštajna služba (BND) podržava ocenu Amerikanaca da režim sirijskog predsednika Bašara al-Asada stoji iza napada otrovnim gasom u predgrađu Damaska 21. avgusta. U tajnim poverljivim izjavama za bezbednosne političare, predsednik BND Gerhard Šindler rekao je da nedostaje jasan dokaz. Nakon dubinske analize verodostojnosti, međutim, njegovo ministarstvo pretpostavlja da je krivac režim.“
Strana obaveštajna agencija zemlje, Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), slaže se sa stavom SAD-a koji smatra da je sirijski predsednik Bašar Asad odgovoran za napade otrovnim gasovima u blizini Damaska 21. avgusta. Na tajnom brifingu za odabir poslanika u ponedeljak, šef BND-a Gerhard Šindler rekao je da, iako još uvek nema neospornih dokaza, analiza dostupnih dokaza navela je njegovu obaveštajnu službu da veruje da je kriv Asadov režim.
Na brifingu je Šindler rekao da samo Asadov režim poseduje binarno hemijsko oružje poput sarina. BND veruje da bi režimski stručnjaci bili jedini sposobni za proizvodnju takvog oružja i njegovo raspoređivanje malim raketama. BND veruje da je takvo oružje korišćeno nekoliko puta pre napada 21. avgusta, za koje se veruje da je usmrtilo više od 1.400 ljudi
3) Možemo znati da je BND bolje znao zbog obaveštajnih oficira koji su bili previše glupi da bi držali jezik za zubima. U stvari BND nije nadležan samo u Siriji, BND je posvećen svrgavanju Asada:
U izveštaju se navode reči američkog obaveštajnog agenta koji kaže: „Nijedna zapadna obaveštajna služba nema tako dobre izvore u Siriji kao što ima BND.“
Član BND-a rekao je za novine da je obaveštajna služba „ponosna na važan doprinos koji je srušila Asadov režim“. Nije navedeno ime zvaničnika u izveštaju.
Ono što će se znati je, ovo su sve informacije koje su stavljene pred nemačke parlamentarce i koje su bile u njihovom posedu u poslednje dve godine, čak i dok je Angela Merkel papagajski izveštavala obaveštajne agencije „Asad je to učinio“, bez obzira što Asad to nije učinio, nikada to nije učinio.
Ono što je ružno je da nemački političari prihvataju da ih laže njihova obaveštajna agencija, a pritom drže jezik za zubima i sede na rukama dok poseduju dokaze o stvarnim počiniocima ratnog zločina.
I, ne zaboravimo da hemikalije, sirovine za izradu gasa sarina, dolaze ili su poreklom IZ EVROPE, pre tranzita preko Turske uz pomoć obaveštajne agencije NATO-a (uz saučesništvo obaveštajnih agencija, množina, BND je to zataškao) i predate su u ruke al Kaida i Islamske države.
Na šta bi trebalo da se podseti ovo prikrivanje činjenica zločina otrovnim gasom? Poreklo političke stranke Angele Merkel sa Adenauerom, koji je dočekivao naciste u redove demohrišćana? BND koji je osnovala CIA rehabilitovanjem glavnog ratnog zločinca Rajnharda Gelena? Da li je tačno da Nemačka nikada nije izgubila određenu nacističku crtu?
jul 2018., u 14:19, OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> je napsao:
Poštovani,
Hvala vam za vašu poruku. Imajte na umu da Međunarodni krivični sud ima vrlo ograničenu nadležnost. Sud se može baviti samo zločinima genocida, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima kako su definisani članovima 6 do 8 Rimskog statuta koji su se dogodili posle 2002, i može vršiti jurisdikciju samo u zemljama koje su ga ratifikovale. Za više informacija o nadležnosti Suda i pun tekst Rimskog statuta, pogledajte stranicu 2 priloženog dokumenta i našu veb stranicu, kao i našu adresu, http://www.icc-cpi.int. Savetujemo vam da pažljivo pregledate ove informacije.
Ako i nakon pažljivog pregleda i dalje smatrate da je ICC pravo mesto za vaš slučaj i želite da podnesete zahtev Sudu, sledite uputstva kako to učiniti na stranici 1 priloženog dokumenta. Ako odlučite da pošaljete informacije, koristite samo ovu adresu e-pošte: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.
Srdačan pozdrav,
OTP informativni desk
Međunarodni krivični sud
Korekcija 5. jula 2018., u odeljku IV, ime Gerhard Šreder, ispravljeno je u Gerhard Šindler (bivši predsednik BND-a). ICC je obavešten o ovoj ispravci.
Ažuriranje od 9. jula 2018.: Sledeća komunikacija primljena od ICC-a:
Hag, 9. jula 2018.
Poštovani,
Tužilaštvo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda potvrđuje prijem vaših dokumenata / pisma.
Ova komunikacija je uredno uneta u Registar komunikacija Zavoda. Razmotrićemo ovu komunikaciju, prema potrebi, u skladu sa odredbama Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda.
Imajte na umu da ovo potvrdno pismo ne znači da je istraga otvorena, niti da će istragu otvoriti Tužilaštvo.
Čim se donese odluka, obavestićemo vas, u pisanoj formi, i dostaviti vam razloge za ovu odluku.
Iskreno Vaš,
Mark P. Dilon, šef jedinice za informacije i dokaze
Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.
After two years of sitting on letters from the ICC it became the apropos time to act; considering the German ambassador to Serbia in April 2021 made some remarks picked up on by a Western corporate media front:
^ Rockefeller Brothers Fund awards Balkan Investigative Reporting Network [BIRN] Pristina office on average of USD $100,000 per year, only one source of funds BIRN rakes in from Western corporate largesse [1]
So, what did the German ambassadorial chump have to say? Despite there being no legal United Nations authorization for the NATO bombing of Serbia, the decision to bomb Serbia…
“had to be made in order to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe” [2]
… well, huh. No mention of the recent packing off of Kosovo’s leaders to war crimes trials? Oh, and what about those BND (German CIA) ‘people’ using the Konrad Adenauer Siftung as a front to train and install neo-nazi fascists in Ukraine? Ever wonder what BND might be up to in Belgrade? [3], [4]
We don’t have to time travel to the early-mid 1940s to understand “Deutschland über Alles” should be seen a bit differently in the eyes of certain of Germany’s neighboring countries than most of today’s ordinary German mortals might think. But German Ambassador to Serbia, Thomas Schieb, is no ordinary German mortal, he presides over the location where Germany’s BND (nee Gehlen Organization) is centered in Belgrade.
Meanwhile, let’s have a look at an International Criminal Court letter (initial denial) concerning some very nasty acts by the German state; that is ‘laundering’ a false flag war crime resulting in the deaths of well over 1,000 Syrian civilians (keep reading, all necessary context and evidence had been presented.)
Note the dates of the letter; 4 July 2018 the complaint had been received by the ICC, 6 February 2019 is the date the ICC denied it held jurisdiction to investigate. This was no snap reply, seven months indicates, if not soul-searching, then at least some considerable time put into thinking about the necessary circumlocution to avoid having to deal with the wealth of information put before the court. I contested this denial with a communication (published online) pointing out a history of the ICC subject to improper influences and demand they reconsider. [5]
The first letter is a more generic denial, the second letter is a contortion to explain the court finds some “serious allegations” are beyond its reach to investigate:
When the International Criminal Court [ICC] itself is complicit in covering up war crimes by German state actors in the 21st Century, everyone at the top should have some explaining to do. In short, what follows is, there is ample evidence prima facie [Latin term: ‘on its face’] German intelligence had “aided & abetted” [assisted] with laundering false flag chemical attacks in Syria including the notorious (especially murderous) sarin gas attack at Ghouta, Syria, in August, 2013. This information had been provided to German parliamentarians and as well as the International Criminal Court. The Germans were silent and the International Criminal Court protests it has no jurisdiction, per the second letter:
“The Office of the Prosecutor has carefully examined your latest communication. I regret to advise you that the Prosecutor has confirmed that the communication does not introduce new facts or evidence that would alter the previous determination that there is not a basis to proceed under the Rome Statute. Under the Rome Statute, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8), when committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over such crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court (Article 13). In the light of these requirements, your communication still appears, after careful re-examination, to relate to matters outside the jurisdiction of the Court.
“I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address. We are grateful for your continued interest in the International Criminal Court”
The ICC is clearly wrong. And cowardly & corrupt. Germany is a signatory to the ICC, and the crime of aiding and abetting (false flag laundering) is undoubtedly centered inside the German state. The ICC, to escape this (despite admission of “serious allegations”), appears to be narrowly defining jurisdiction (limiting the applicable charges) to the crime as committed in Syria (and thus avoids the charge of aiding & abetting) and therefore denies jurisdiction rather than take on German state intelligence (the Bundesnachrichtendienst or BND) and Angela Merkel’s minions.
The question that arises in philosophy of law is, does the ICC itself become complicit in the aiding & abetting [assisting] the alleged laundering of the false flag operation by a clearly deliberate ‘narrow’ reading of international law and providing a patently cowardly rationale excusing themselves from having to investigate a major war crime? Methinks, yes:
Here is the complaint itself, followed by my communications with the ICC leading to filing the initial complaint:
Dear Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court
Thank you for the invitation to formalize my complaint concerning the crime of sarin gas employed at Ghouta, Syria, in August of 2013.
I
Under customary international law, aiding and abetting war crimes includes three elements:
(1) A Principal person or entity committed a war crime;
(2) Another actor committed an act that had a substantial effect upon the commission of the underlying offence; and
(3) Required mental state: The other actor knew that that such an act would assist, or had the substantial likelihood of assisting, the commission of the underlying offense.
1) Turkey, a NATO nation, via its’ intelligence agency MIT, conspired with al Qaida (a proposed clandestine NATO affiliate) to commit a war crime, that is the (false flag) gassing and death of more than one thousand civilians at Ghouta, Syria, in August, 2013.
2) Officials of NATO actor Germany, a signatory to The Rome Statute, provided ‘cover’ via propaganda and other, related means (e.g. laundering false information to media via parliamentary oversight) allowing the actual perpetrators to escape scrutiny despite German intelligence knowing:
3) Such act (immediate preceding) substantially would assist the commission of the specified crime or in other words, enable false-flag impunity.
Arts 49/50/129/146 of the four Geneva Conventions (1949) requiring the Member States to prosecute and punish all ‘persons’ who commit grave breaches (Ambos [2014] 146). Accordingly, the Elements of Crimes of the ICC Statute do not provide an explicit note for the category of perpetrators as there was no dissent during the negotiations at the Rome Conference that war crimes can be committed by both members of armed forces and civilians (Dörmann, Elements of War Crimes [2003] 391).
Going to the immediate preceding (III), this petitioner to the International Criminal Court (Ronald Thomas West) holds persons in any government signatory to the Rome Statute are prohibited from aiding and abetting a war crime or crime against humanity no matter the crime had been outside the courts purview (non-signatory state) when the aiding and abetting is committed within the courts purview (a signatory state.) This would include certain Western democracies intelligence agencies employees and aligned politicians providing cover for perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Named persons of the German federal security service and responsible politicians (Bundesnachrichtendienst) who’ve proactively (provided false information) or passively (allowed false information) to purposely aid and abet the actual perpetrators (Turkey’s MIT in partnership with al-Qaida) of the (false flag) gas attack at Ghouta, Syria in August 2013 include (but is not limited to) past president of BND Gerhard Schindler, present president of BND Bruno Kahl, Helge Braun (oversight minister) and Angela Merkel.
Named persons directing the German office of the Federal Prosecutor (Generalbundesanwalt/Generalbundesanwältin) who’ve failed to investigate and prosecute domestically and internationally (universal jurisdiction for war crimes or Völkerstrafgesetzbuch) are Harald Range and Peter Frank.
Named German parliamentarians (leadership and/or senior members) who’ve been in possession (since at least December 2015) of exculpatory evidence exonerating President Bashar al Assad and his officials and military of the sarin attack at Ghouta, Syria, in August 2013 and have failed to take appropriate action to bring the German intelligence service and/or German political actors into compliance with established facts per international law and consequently protected a NATO actor and their al-Qaida partners from the light as the actual perpetrators include (but are not limited to) Hans-Christian Stroebele, Ulla Jelpke, Irene Mihalic, Michael Hartmann, Armin Schuster, Norbert Lammert, Peter Hintze, Johannes Singhammer, Edelgard Bulmahn, Ursula Schmidt, Petra Pau, Claudia Roth, Marieluise Beck, Omid Nouripour, Stefan Liebich, Niels Annen, Roderich Kiesewetter and Gregor Gysi.
To contextualize the long habit of Western intelligence agencies sponsoring and/or aiding and abetting false-flag state terror it is recommended the ICC prosecutor review the history of GLADIO:
For a larger understanding of the underlying or founding criminal nature/background of Germany’s Bundesnachrichtendienst it is recommended the ICC prosecutor review the BND origins and history of the Gehlen Organization:
Contextualizing the NATO nations (includes Rome Statute signatory Germany) intelligence agencies relationship to the chemical crimes of al-Qaida in Syria, it is recommended the ICC prosecutor examine the journalism of Vanessa Beeley concerning the so-called White Helmets:
Buttressing the Turkish MP Eren Erdem’s statement ‘rebel’ (al-Qaida) chemicals were sourced in Europe, is Russian military intelligence:
Western intelligence agencies have a long history of underhanded play (criminal activity.) In the case of Germany’s BND aiding and abetting al-Qaida in Syria, there is strong evidence prima facie of deliberately laundering false information through the Federal German Parliament (Bundestag) intelligence oversight committee to media effecting the coverup (concealing the actual perpetrators) of a war crime involving sarin gas, per the original information provided to the ICC as amended:
What Can Be Known Versus What Will Be Known
Likely, it will only be a matter time before the CIA editors at Wikipedia will change the recently updated information in the above (cropped-enlarged screenshot) Wikipedia article last updated 4 April 2018:
“Erdem also claims that sarin-gas was transported through Turkey to Syria, later used in the Ghouta chemical attack in 2013,[4][5] as well as later ISIL-attacks against civilians.[6] Erdem showed before the parliament a case where investigations leading to the arrest of 13 potential Turkish ISIL-members were made, but later inexplicably dropped.[7][8]
“Erdem faces treason charges in Turkey for his leaks.[5]“
What is Turkish Member of Parliament Eren Erdem on record as having stated? Speaking of a copy in his possession of the Adana Prosecutor’s criminal case 2013/120 that was quashed by Erdogan’s people:
“There is data in this indictment. Chemical weapon materials are being brought to Turkey and being put together in Syria in camps of ISIS which was known as Iraqi Al Qaeda during that time
“These are all detected. There are phone recordings of this shipment like ‘don’t worry about the border, we’ll take care of it’ and we also see the bureaucracy is being used
“About the shipment, Republic prosecutor of Adana, Mehmet Arıkan, made an operation and the related people were detained. But as far as I understand he was not an influential person in bureaucracy. A week after, another public prosecutor was assigned, took over the indictment and all the detainees were released. And they left Turkey crossing the Syrian border
“The phone recordings in the indictment showed all the details from how the shipment was going to be made to how it was prepared, from the content of the labs to the source of the materials. Which trucks were going to be used, all dates etc. From A to Z, everything was discussed and recorded. Despite all of this evidence, the suspects were released
“And the shipment happened, because no one stopped them. That’s why maybe the sarin gas used in Syria is a result of this
“When I read the indictment, I saw clearly that these people have relationships with The Machinery and Chemical Industry Institution of Turkey and they don’t have any worries about crossing the border
“For example in Hayyam Kasap’s phone records, you hear him saying sarin gas many times, saying that the ateliers are ready for production, materials are waiting in trucks which were supposedly carrying club soda
“For example the chemical attack in Ghouta. Remember. It was claimed that the regime forces were behind it. This attack was conducted just days before the sarin operation in Turkey
“It’s a high probability that this attack was carried out with those basic materials shipped through Turkey. It is said the regime forces are responsible but the indictment says it’s ISIS. UN inspectors went to the site but they couldn’t find any evidence. But in this indictment, we’ve found the evidence. We know who used the sarin gas, and our government knows it too
“All basic materials are purchased from Europe. Western institutions should question themselves about these relations. Western sources know very well who carried out the sarin gas attack in Syria. They know these people, they know who these people are working with, they know that these people are working for Al-Qaeda. I think is Westerns are hypocrites about the situation”
What more can be known?
1) The German Parliament’s leadership (all political parties), as well the German Federal Prosecutor, had been apprised of the preceding by yours truly on 2 December 2015:
Dear Members of the German Parliament
I wish to draw attention to recent information regarding your NATO ally Turkey. Last month it had been revealed by two courageous members of Turkey’s parliament that in fact it was Turkey’s federal intelligence services were behind the August 2013 Sarin gas attack, killing more than one thousand ordinary Syrians, an attack NATO nations had blamed on the regime of Basher al-Assad. Your own Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) should have been aware of this fact from very nearly the beginning, as they have been proactively engaged in Syria and the Syrian conflict, as well as spying on Turkey.
What’s more is, state actor Turkey initiating the Sarin attack is not some undocumented allegation. As you can see from the attached reporting, there was a proper investigation by Turkish authorities with developed evidence and indictments. I regret to inform you in this case, President Erdogan personally initiated the prosecution that last week saw the editor of the newspaper reporting put in jail.
This raises strong questions of possible BND criminal complicity considering Germany’s support for certain NATO nations directly in relation to the Syrian conflict. What did the BND know and when? Has the BND, when passing intelligence on Syria to Assad’s opposition through its NATO allies, supported the actors who gassed the Syrians? Is Germany’s supportive relationship to the Erdogan government a lawful one, in light of this evidence? Has the BND contributed to the geopolitical disinformation blaming Assad for the August 2013 Sarin attack? Has your parliament been deceived in this matter, particularly your intelligence oversight committee?
Clearly the Sarin case, considering Germany, as a knowledgeable or complicit actor in Syria, should be pursued against the Turkey via the legal mechanism of Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, as well as domestic prosecutions of those German officials, noting the BND particularly, who’ve failed in their reporting requirements and/or conspired to conceal a war crime or crime against humanity.
These should be questions and demand you will present to the federal prosecutor.
Ron West
2) Germany’s foreign intelligence service (BND) lied to the German parliament’s intelligence oversight committee:
(Translated, highlighted text) “Berlin – The Federal Intelligence Service (BND) supports the assessment of the Americans that the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is behind the poison gas attacks on suburbs of Damascus on 21 August.In secret classified statements for security politicians, BND President Gerhard Schindler said a clear proof is missing.After an in-depth plausibility analysis, however, his ministry assumes that the regime is the culprit”
[T]he country’s foreign intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), agrees with the US position which holds Syrian President Bashar Assad responsible for the poison gas attacks near Damascus on Aug. 21. In a secret briefing to select lawmakers on Monday, BND head Gerhard Schindler said that while there is still no incontestable proof, analysis of the evidence at hand has led his intelligence service to believe that Assad’s regime is to blame.
In the briefing, Schindler said that only the Assad regime is in possession of binary chemical weapons such as sarin. The BND believes that regime experts would be the only ones capable of manufacturing such weapons and deploying them with small missiles. The BND believes that such weapons had been used several times prior to the attack on Aug. 21, which is believed to have killed more than 1,400 people
3) We can know BND knew better because of intelligence officers who were too stupid to keep their mouths shut. In fact BND is not only competent in Syria, BND is dedicated to the overthrow of Assad:
The report quotes a US intelligence agent as saying: “No Western intelligence service has as good sources in Syria as the BND does.”
A member of the BND told the newspaper that the intelligence service was “proud of the important contribution [it] is making to the overthrow of the Assad regime.” The official was not named in the report
What will be known is, this is all information had been put before German parliamentarians and has been in their possession for the past two years, even as Angela Merkel parrots the intelligence agencies “Assad did it” no matter Assad didn’t do it, has never done it.
What is ugly is, German politicians accept being lied to by their own intelligence agency while keeping their mouths shut and sitting on their hands when in possession of evidence of the actual perpetrators of a war crime.
And, let’s not forget the sarin gas precursor chemicals were originally sourced or originated IN EUROPE, prior to transiting Turkey via a NATO nation’s intelligence agency (with complicity of intelligence agencies, plural, BND has covered this up), and delivered into the hands of al Qaida & Islamic State.
What should this covering up facts of a crime of poison gas recall? Angela Merkel’s political party’s origins with Adenauer welcoming Nazis into the Christian Democrats’ ranks? The BND founded by the CIA’s rehabilitation of major war criminal Reinhard Gehlen? Is it true Germany has never shed certain Nazi spots?
On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:19 PM, OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your message. Please note that the International Criminal Court has a very limited jurisdiction. The Court may only address the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as defined by Articles 6 to 8 of the Rome Statute that have occurred after 2002, and can only exercise jurisdiction in the countries that have ratified it. For more information on the Court’s jurisdiction and the full text of the Rome Statute, please refer to page 2 of the attached document and our website as well as our address, http://www.icc-cpi.int. We encourage you to carefully review this information.
If, after your careful review, you still believe the ICC is the correct place for your case and would like to submit a claim to the Court, then please follow the directions for how to do so on page 1 of the attached document. If you decide to submit information, kindly use only this email address : otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.
Kind regards,
OTP Information Desk International Criminal Court
5 July 2018 correction, in section IV, the name ‘Gerhard Schroeder, has been corrected to Gerhard Schindler (past president of the BND.) The ICC has been notified of this correction.
9 July 2018 update: The following communication received from the ICC:
The Hague, 9 July 2018
Dear sir/madam
The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court acknowledges receipt of your documents/letter.
This communication has been duly entered in the Communications Register of the Office. We will give consideration to this communication, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Please note this acknowledgement letter does not mean an investigation has been opened, nor that an investigation will be opened by the Office of the Prosecutor.
As soon as a decision is reached, we will inform you, in writing, and provide you with reasons for this decision.
Yours sincerely, Mark P. Dillon, Head of Information & Evidence Unit Office of The Prosecutor
A former Special Forces Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald is published in International Law as a layman (The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole) and has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s Western educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
The ceremonial investment of Biden as President of the United States is little more than theater along the lines history’s crowning a new ‘Holy Roman Emperor.’ After this ‘investment’ show, any honest president’s “State of the Union” address should cover important points underlying the current state of the USA’s social psychology. The USA most certainly will NOT be provided this honest assessment but simply more & growing transparent political lies underpinning greed that ‘secures’ empire.
What certainly will be missing is, the fact that since the National Security Act of 1947, ‘rule of law’ in these ‘United States’ has been transformed into ‘color of law’ where constitutional principles can no longer be squared with the laws as made and applied in fact. The oath to uphold the constitution has become a caricature that is patently meaningless.
Conservative America more largely, and America’s liberal dissidents in lesser numbers, sense this judicial perversion and it is the conservatives are the historic keepers of those constitutional principles most departed from in this ‘new age of national security.’
The USA is in a state of the nation’s anti-federalist heritage, primarily, having been usurped. It was supposed to be both, a constitutional balance of the federalist & anti-federalist philosophies, or that is to say a central government with solid checks, not one or the other in the extreme that is tyranny or anarchy with leadership gone off the rails.
It follows, in a case where the people have been so pervasively lied to, for so long, there are now two entirely separate & artificial realities, with either side incapable of grasping neutral facts beyond the borders of their own cultural myths. That’s the fruit of irresponsible ‘free speech’ in a corporate monopolized modern mainstream media where political lies possess so-called ‘constitutional’ protections. For this fact, neither side, conservative or liberal, can correctly read those foundational principles that should have, if only they had been adhered to, prevented the “security state’s” overreach, which is a complaint of the one side on one day and the complaint of the other side on another day, depending solely upon who is in the cross-hairs of proposed and/or enacted legislation.
Mutually exclusive historical revisionism accounts finding their way into the social fabric are part and parcel of these isolated (divorced from reality) cultural myths in the two alienated camps of the present body politic. For instance the Evangelical wing of the Republicans have rewritten the First Amendment’s history concerning separation of church & state to favor the Christian church particularly; while the Democrats have consistently misrepresented (done away with) the Second Amendment’s original purpose as a ‘check of last resort’ on state tyranny.
The 1st of the preceding threatens devolution into a large segment of an armed populace propping up what amounts to anarchy-like or mob rule led by ‘Christian ayatollahs’, whereas the 2nd of the preceding threatens a disarmed populace with whatever a corporate (1%) tyranny’s whims demand in any given moment.
The current ‘divide & conquer’ tensions play out in unbridgeable social dynamic where the red states’ conservatives are being driven to a deeply superstitious conservatism of a distant past due to a real subliminal fear of a ‘liberal’ cultural revolution being imposed upon them; while the blue states’ liberals are becoming radicalized into intolerant ‘woke’ because they perceive a revanchist conservatism threat imposing what they consider are archaic social values on themselves in turn.
The George Bush mantra “You are with us or against us” is now employed in domestic politics, whether called forth in the attitudes of Pelosi and Shumer or their allies represented in the “Never Trump!” Republicans, this is recently a threat aimed indiscriminately at a large section of the American public. Claiming Trump is the leader of the USA white supremacist movement is like claiming Biden is the leader of LA’s MS-13 gang. Trump is a perfectly imperfect hope or expression of 1/2 of an electorate desperate to escape ‘business as usual’ in DC opposed to Biden and Biden’s “Never Trump!” Republican support or the corporate establishment’s determination to never cede power back to the people.
“You are with us or against us” is no longer a threat thrown solely at the “homeland’s” foreign ‘provinces of empire’ in circumstance where domestically the Republican Party is broken and the Democratic Party is terminally ill with the disease of corruption. These times find the levers of power have been invested in what amounts to a coterie of reactionary, radically ignorant leaders (includes the moron Trump surrounded by ‘prosperity gospel’ corporate minions who could not altogether control him, not only the radical ignorance of Pelosi, Schumer, Biden & Harris.)
With little or no middle ground left, and middle ground is the only way forward that would see the state’s institutions secure over the long run, is there an avenue available to the alienated parties to sit down and talk?
In the present circumstance, the plain answer is “NO.”
Culminating in the treasonous SCOTUS decision “Citizens United” any pretense the people’s representatives actually answer to the people at the ballot box is dead. Politicians answer to corporate wealth that is the billions pumped into buying elections (especially military-industrial related corporate billions) and any (practically all) political career(s) become dependent on this corporate wealth and are incapable of responsibly responding to or serving the will of a now fatally divided electorate.
With the American Congress having morphed into a 21st Century science fiction monster’s corporate exoskeleton, similar to JRR Tolkien’s giant, malevolent spider Shelob, but now representing American empire rather than Mordor, the spine of democracy has been dissolved from the inside. It isn’t/wasn’t the Russians, China or Iran. The many acts of a corporate ‘axis of evil’ are clearly an American internal affair, and there is no one left to fix this mess in any genuine sense of ‘democratic principles’ that factually no longer exist; because water cannot be drunk from a mirage.
A logical conclusion would be empire puppet & ‘police state champion’ (Patron Saint of Incarceration) Kamala Harris had been the consensus choice of the neoliberal wing of the military/industrial corporate state; because demanding the ‘nuclear trigger’ be removed from a “deranged” Trump (beware of the false-flag with an apocalyptic Pence finger on the button) within the last two weeks of his presidency, only to hand it to Biden who’d plainly been entering a state of senile dementia from the 2020 campaigns’ inception, is an oxymoron too great, a reach too far.
Biden has been nothing more than a vehicle to ultimately put this multiple primaries loser on the throne. Because she is black and a woman, no doubt Harris’ ‘masters’ hope the ‘woke’ libtard electorate would follow her off a cliff like so many lemmings. That’s the real nature of psyops.
*
Note for whitey: Before you jism in your pants with a misreading of the concluding paragraph, intelligent expression means everything to me, the color of one’s skin means nothing. Check out “Native Americans & Race”
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Ronald Thomas West 
