email header of Senator Tester’s “Veterans Newsletter”
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again—it’s an honor to serve veterans in Montana and across the country every day as Chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.
Since taking the gavel last January, my top priority has been addressing toxic exposure in a comprehensive way. And in a way our veterans deserve.
Over the past few years we’ve made great strides in addressing military toxic exposures—from the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act to the Fair Care for Vietnam Veterans Act, these historic laws continue to provide long-overdue benefits and care to tens of thousands of veterans suffering as a result of their exposure.
But, our work for the men and women who’ve sacrificed so much is far from over.
That why I’m proud to announce we’re moving the needle once again for toxic-exposed veterans with the introduction of my Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act—bipartisan legislation to offer Post-9/11 combat veterans, including those suffering from conditions caused by toxic exposures, access to VA health care.
Right now, nearly one-third of the 3.5 million Post-9/11 combat veterans exposed to toxic substances are not able to access VA care—and that’s a serious problem. Without action, more veterans will pay the ultimate price while waiting for the treatment they need. That’s why this bill is so critical.
The good news is, back in Washington we’re working hard to keep up our end of the bargain. Just last week, my Committee unanimously passed the bipartisan Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act.
This kind of swift, bipartisan action is a testament to what can be accomplished when results are prioritized over politics. And I’m proud the Committee is doing its part to connect a generation of burn pit veterans with the care they need—care they can’t wait for any longer.
While this a great start—it’s only our first step in our three-step approach to deliver for all generations of veterans suffering from the conditions related to toxic exposure. This bipartisan solution is consistent with my COST of War Act, and is a priority that can garner the support it needs from across the aisle to make it to the President’s desk.
I’m committed to seeing this process through, and will continue waging this effort until we deliver quality health care and benefits to the folks who’ve earned it.
We started this fight, and together we’re going to finish it.
Or so says the mail in my box from my (nominal) USA senator from Montana. I’ve kept up a legal residence address in Montana over these past going on 15 years exile, so I suppose I could have voted if I wished to, but I see no point because the USA is a corporate-captured oligarchy. No matter which way you vote, it is a self-deceit, it is the lobbyists’ money in DC buy the lot of politicians. Senator Tester’s lip-service opposing “Citizens United” granting corporations equal rights to citizens notwithstanding, it’s colossal corporate amounts of money own us. Especially the unaccountable ‘dark money’ invested in elections by practically anyone with wealth & power, notably corporate proxy billionaires that amount to American oligarchs; Soros, the Koch brothers, Gates & too many more to count, ad nausea.) [1]
My reply to Senator Tester:
Dear Senator Tester
It’s good someone is attempting [to] bring the level of care to the veterans’ community to point of what’s fair and right. Now, how about considering the cost of the toxic exposure at its root; maintaining empire? At this point in our American history, how can it not be clear our veterans have been cannon fodder for Dow-DuPont, Northrop-Grumman, Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, General Dynamics, Chevron and too many more recipients of what amount to profiteering contracts; pushing armaments sales and/or geopolitical posturing/positioning at the price of not only the lives, blood and health of our soldiers but the colossal and horrific price we have put on humanity elsewhere while sacrificing immense good will towards ourselves to point of our being increasingly hated around the world as a matter of fact and expectation. As a USA veteran of our foreign wars, I want [to see] an ‘End the Toxic Exposure to American Corporate Profiteering Empire Act.’
I waited all week for the reply I very much doubted would be forthcoming; from the man who swears by his loyalty to American veterans but lacks the insights and/or balls to take on the policies that basically serve as a wrecking-ball for the USA soldiers’ lives and health; in relation to the USA’s imperial behavior abroad causing immense damage to other nations peoples’ lives, health & livelihoods, and not least, the hit-job on international law that attends this USA policy of ‘exceptionalism’ that is the 21st Century’s heir to the policy of ‘Manifest Destiny.’ This policy had ruthlessly over-run North America’s indigenous nations by force of arms with attending and very much self-serving ‘color of law’ cancelling treaties as might be convenient at any given moment. There is nothing new in what we’re looking at today except for the scale & lethality have grown immensely. It’s a mentality, a mindset, a meme.
“As you sow, so shall you reap“
In today’s case of messing with Russia, these words could come true.
To be (treasonous to globalism) or not to be (treasonous to one’s own culture.) That is the question.
The proposition as presented, in a play on Shakespeare’s words, thinly conceals a communications trick; these are not distinct things but the same. There is no question between the two in any sense of what is actually presented, only observation of a single fact from separate construction-perspective.
Multiculturalism in a sense of globalism, historically speaking, is a result of conquest via imperialism. The short example given would be Rome and the ‘Romance Languages’ reflecting Rome’s creation of a linguistic monoculture that, over time, devolved into Italian, Romanian, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese and French being the most spoken, and sharing Catholicism excepting Romania, which is largely Orthodox due to its geographic location and history tied to what became the Eastern Roman Empire. In every geographic case, the original languages are displaced, marginalized or extinct (including in Italy, e.g. Etruscan), together with the original cultures and religions.
At first glance, this might seem a surprising result. How did many cultures become what amounts to a monoculture? How did many languages and cultures succumb to a single language and culture that became a new family of (closely related) languages and cultures?
It is as simple as Latin became the language one had to become fluent in, to competently function within the intra-empire structures as a whole. Did this happen overnight? No. But it finally DID happen; to function as a Gaul from what became France, demanded a working use of Latin when opportunity afforded (or Rome demanded) one live and work in Iberia in what became Spain, no different to peoples of the several Iberian tribes had to master Latin to function in the economy of the globalism of that era. Over time, everyone became ‘Romanized’ in a new, Christianized, monoculture. The Roman empire’s multiculturalism, then, had melded into a new monoculture and Europe lost an incalculable amount of cultural diversity, including the extinction of many languages.
Modern globalism not only points to a repeat of this social phenomenon of multiculturalism leading to cultural extinctions and a new monoculture; but threatens an accelerated process in the age of the so-called ‘world-wide-web.’
It was Cicily Isabel Fairfield astutely asserted:
“There is not the smallest reason for confounding nationalism, which is the desire of a people to be itself, with imperialism, which is the desire of a people to prevent other peoples from being themselves”
What is Fairfield disentangling here? The quote is contextualized in the events leading up to, and the beginning of, World War Two, and Nazi Germany’s invasions of multiple European states. In Fairfield’s understanding, the French resistance, particularly, would be more properly defined as ‘nationalist’ (patriot), as opposed to their German occupiers, which should be more properly defined ‘imperialist.’ In the throes leading up to the war, during the propaganda events of the war itself, and especially aftermath of WWII, this German imperialism, in an etymology turned on its head, for the simple fact the Germans labeled themselves “National Socialists”, inculcated a weaponized use of the term ‘nationalist’ & ‘nationalism’ but in fact this is a perverted use of a word that should be indistinguishable from patriotism.
To drive home the point, a healthy nationalism should be indistinguishable from patriotism, inclusive of, and historically tolerant of, national minorities. On the other hand, malignant nationalism (narcissistic nationalism) can be result of social mutation of a populace under pressures that threaten their culture and/or a secure sense of well being. The Germans radically experienced this transformation, following World War One due to economic factors aggravated by the punitive terms incorporated into the Treaty of Versailles. Due to larger Western Europe’s imperial history & mentality (a legacy of Rome & Catholicism among other historical factors & actors), Germany’s ‘rebirth’ following on multiple Prussian incarnations (and let’s not forget the ethnic German Habsberg dynasty) saw malignant nationalism inevitably expressed in imperialism. Old habits die hard. Healthy conservatism or a patriotic nationalism should not be confounded with a malignant or narcissistic nationalism, particularly the malignant nationalism which becomes entangled with imperialism.
As well, today’s upsetting the demographic stability with a large influx of people with radically different cultural view can cause a healthy nationalism to morph into a localized malignant nationalism that sees tolerance erode and even vanish as social tensions rise; for instance in those many cases of large suburban areas of Europe (examples given: Stockholm, Brussels, Paris, Berlin) where radical application of Sharia law de facto rules entire neighborhoods in contravention of the host nation’s nominally required secular law. It is this erosion of authority threatens traditional, indigenous conservatism and mutates a previously more relaxed social tolerance into a social survival, instinct driven, intolerance.
In this 21st Century variation of nationalism (patriotism) pressured into becoming malignant nationalism, postmodern liberals accuse the social conservatives in this initial phase of stresses of being “Nationalist” in a weaponized sense of the word that is disingenuous. In actuality, it is the liberals are contributing towards a future & growing ‘malignancy’ with a refusal to defend their own cultural origins that reflexively demands ‘tolerance’ of what amounts to the de facto overthrow of a culture’s rule of law based order. In today’s world, it is the European mentality’s ‘liberals’ thinly concealed imperial ambitions are both; the midwife and the driver radicalizing European societies. NATO states are the imperial force creating large, displaced populations (examples given would be Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria & Ukraine, and some sub-Sahara Africa countries) and European Union policy demands absorbing millions of these (mostly) radically different cultures’ populace; with any individual EU nations’ resistance suppressed.
Victor Orban’s problem, then, isn’t only the European Union’s demand Hungary ‘integrate’ a large, culturally alien populace into a European, formerly Sufi, Muslim community being aggressively proselytized by Saudi sponsored radical, fundamentalist Wahhabism, but his problem is also the imperial ambitions of NATO. If NATO armies amount to an Imperial Rome’s 21st Century Legions, the European Union is new Imperial Rome’s administrative apparatus. Orban’s problem is, Hungary belongs to both; the legions effect and the administrative apparatus consequence, are part and parcel of the one arrangement of a new empire. Strictly speaking, any distinguishing between NATO and the EU is splitting hairs; these are not merely fraternal organizations as much as they are fully co-joined Siamese twins.
It follows, European democratic secularism, and those in Orban’s circumstance must face this, demonstrates it is little more than theoretical abstract; its supposed Greek derived, ‘enlightenment’ inspired, democratic traditions in actuality more resemble Gaius Julius Caesar’s envy over the military conquests legacy belonging to Alexander III of Macedon.
A Post-Modern Hybrid of German Imperialism & English Language
If this new Imperial Rome’s Senate is in Strasbourg, and the Imperial Legions’ headquarters are located at Brussels, the Emperor’s residence is in Berlin. Having aggressively expanded in recent decades, while projecting its own behaviors on Russia as though it believed that nation were the new Carthage, we can shortly examine Western Europe’s present imperial expansion in the Western Balkans to assess in a microcosm, the repeat of history at the macro-cosmic level.
As put forward in the essay Education & Espionage, an intelligence assessment of German intelligence agency, Bundesnachrichtendienst, conforming/subverting Serbian academia to the ‘liberal’ political stance via Germany’s Christian Democratic Union associated Konrad Adenauer Siftung at Belgrade, it is not a reach to tie this to the policy position of Ursula von der Leyen; a longtime CDU government minister moved on to EU Commission President concerning the Serbia-Kosovo so-called “Peace Highway”
“”Truly an unbelievable thing, it connects with Austria and Greece and this is truly a motor for the Serbian economy, trade and investment. This is an economic plan that is already functioning in Serbia and we truly are connecting Europe,” she said, adding that the majority of youth in Serbia deserved a greener, prosperous and digital future”
Yes, perhaps, so long as the New Rome keeps an Imperial Legion (NATO’s KFOR) in place to insinuate this infrastructure facilitates the rapid movement of modern armor (tanks, howitzers, personnel carriers) were Serbia to attempt reasserting sovereignty over the occupied Serbian majority territory in the north of Kosovo. On top of this, Saudi & Turkish funded missionary/proselytizing allowed to run amok in Kosovo are seeing the moderate Islam of the original Kosovar Muslims displaced by the aggressive & radical Wahhabism. This is no highway to peace. Oh, and about that ‘digital’ future for the youth; the world-wide-web is dominated by English, EU parliamentarians, to cross ethnic boundaries, speak in English, academics from across Europe’s national boundaries communicate in English, the many ‘international’ schools made available to today’s youth instruct in English, and international economics & business relations across Europe are conducted in English. English is the new Imperial Rome’s & future monoculture language that should see Serbian and other languages begin to vanish in not so distant future.
Then, the German Christian Democratic Union’s ‘sister’ party, Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (Bavaria was the least ‘denazified’ German state) gifts the Balkans with the extra-judicially appointed (in violation of the Dayton Accords because he is not confirmed by the UN Security Council) High Representative for Bosnia Christian Schmidt:
“[Republika Srpska’s] Presidency member Milorad Dodik’s announcement that he will talk about the peaceful disintegration of the country, as he has now begun to announce, to disband the army and have an old Republika Srpska army. I think this is the time to make it clear that the international community is not bound to get into the situations we just got into in the 1990s. There is no peaceful dissolution”
Schmidt’s language concerning the Republika Srpska is disingenuous in multiple instance; there was no use of the language “Disintegration” (Schmidt’s hyperbole), there was no language concerning “disbanding” the Bosnian army but rather having the Bosnian army depart Republika Srpska’s territory with demand any Serbian members of that military force choosing to stay with it, should depart with it; and finally, “there is no peaceful dissolution” would appear a thinly veiled threat to return the new Imperial Rome’s legions to deter the Republika Srpska’s international law founded “right to self-determination of peoples.” In fact Republika Srpska’s claim to a right of self determination, the basis underlying Milorad Dodik’s “peaceful withdrawal” announcement, is chartered in United Nations treaty law; Republika Srpska is a recognized ethnic majority political entity and therefore is entitled to exercise a right of self-determination via plebiscite. The Imperial residence at Berlin’s problem with this is, international law affords avenue to Republika Srpska’s national sovereignty and this national sovereignty is at odds with the purpose of empire. All in all, Schmidt is demonstrably a liar; there is no expressed intention in the Republika Srpska’s position to return to the violence of the 1990s, rather this threat of violence is the new Rome’s Imperial threat projected onto Republika Srpska.
Another ‘envoy’ parroting the Emperor’s residence at Berlin would be Viola von Cramon, the European Parliament’s Rapporteur for the Western Balkans, poking the European Union’s (in effect, Germany’s) nose where it clearly doesn’t belong:
”[Republika Srpska’s expressing a right to self-determination] is simply unacceptable and jeopardises all the progress that has been made in the post-war period. Bosnia and Herzegovina is still very fragile, yet complex, and we are closely monitoring the situation there, seeking a strong European response, i.e., sanctions for all those who undermine the country’s sovereignty, strengthen EUFOR on the ground and stop Croatia and Serbia from interfering in internal affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina”
What a mouthful of faux concern and threats from the German noble whose Heinrich Böll Siftung in Belgrade, mirrors the German intelligence agency habits of the Konrad Adenauer Siftung in Belgrade the reader will discover in the related essay “Education & Espionage.”
If one were to allow the ethnic Croat region to join Croatia (peacefully) and allow the ethnic Serb region to join Serbia (peacefully), there would far less opportunity for resurgence of malignant nationalism and conflict of the former time, only a remaining Bosniak entity that had welcomed al Qaida jihadis during the 90’s Balkans wars and since has exported home-grown jihadis across the several empire middle East conflicts. Whoa! The new Rome won’t want that exposed to any international microscope!! (noting France has exported by far more.) A resultant Muslim Bosniak state (presumably a moderate one) would have 3 times the population of Montenegro but this sort of ‘inclusiveness’ isn’t a welcome entity in the present Imperial design. Rather the new Rome’s brat-cum-post-modern-Teutonic-tribal-politics ‘nobility’, von Cramon, would prefer NATO’s legions be returned to Bosnia under cover of EUFOR, perpetrating an artificial multicultural state simmering with unresolved ethnic tensions.
At the end of the day, this new Rome should point to something altogether different to diversity in regards to the propaganda versus the reality; it should be exposed the new Imperial design incorporates all of the elements indicating reprise of the old Rome’s devolution are in place. It’s all there: the Imperial structures, the factors pointing to a future crumbling from within, and a developing linguistic monoculture destined to displace & drive to future extinction much of the cultural diversity the European Union so famously claims it treasures.
It is the co-joined twins European Union/NATO’s imperialism presently creates manifold cases of malignant nationalism and thusly upsets the peace of nations and perverts national patriotism, which should ultimately point to this new Rome’s own demise. This is not a fiction’s play, nevertheless, these staged actors cannot be believed even as they believe themselves.
*
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
“I have long observed one rule which prevents any inconveniences from such practices. It is simply this: to be concerned in no affairs I should blush to have made public, and to do nothing but what spies may see and welcome. When a man’s actions are just and honorable, the more they are known, the more his reputation is increased and established. If I was sure, therefore, that my valet de place was a spy, as he probably is, I think I should probably not discharge him for that, if in other respects I liked him” -Benjamin Franklin
This preceding statement concerning the infestation of 1780s Paris by spies during the American revolutionary alliance with France, attributed to the American Minister-Plenipotentiary to France, Benjamin Franklin, goes to his [Franklin’s] driving the French Foreign Minister, Charles Gravier (Count of Vergennes), out of his mind on a single point: Franklin refused to fire his valet who was known to be a British spy. Expanding on the quote (from reading history) Franklin’s attitude (and refusal to fire his valet) stemmed from his conviction that, given the British knowing that Franklin knew the man was a spy, everything the valet reported from Franklin’s conversations would be taken for disinformation.
We’ll come back to this.
Putin’s 2021 annual address to the Valdai Discussion Club struck me as showing a profoundly disillusioned man (in contrast to Putin projecting an oftentimes humorous, lively self-confidence in past.) Waxing philosophical, he seemed a man disabused of any notion he could believe in the olive branches offered in his polite habits of speech regarding the West, did not seem convinced in (his past conviction) a longstanding support for the primacy of international law will prevail, and seemed at a loss when advancing avenue to reasoned, stabilizing solutions when confronted with the malfeasance of NATO, and NATO’s rhetoric versus NATO’s actions (and much more.) His self confidence seems seriously eroded, or alternately stated, Putin seems resigned to understanding his many years proposed solutions of reason has been wasted and must inevitably be discarded in relation to the confounding behavior and intractable nature of those powers confronting Russia.
In a nutshell, his speech impressed as though Putin understood he were wasting his breath, finally accepting principled behaviors will find little reciprocity from the West in the 21st Century play of the “Great Game.”
The Great Misapprehension
Those embracing the misnomer “Cultural Marxism” will be jubilant at Putin’s comparing today’s Western values to the Soviet experiment at its formation. His characterization of this, although not without merit in defending a “healthy conservatism”, nevertheless embraces a cultural myopia; inter-generational socialization determines the shape of societies and Karl Marx’s utopian socialism had been birthed in Christian culture and features (however perverted in practice) early Christian ideal. Denuded of ‘God’, socialism carried secularism to extreme in application of Christian social principle where science was substituted for the mystic experience in humanity; if Marxism aspired to become the great enforcer of Jesus’ teaching “It would be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom” in matters of social equity, it must be stated (in short) why this experiment failed. There was no nurturing of the Human spiritual dimension. Marxism, as put into practice in the 20th Century, originated as oxymoron; a faux, inter-generational, culturally Christian shaped cult in denial of God. As a matter of fact cultures cannot easily overthrow their social origins. Marxism, and V.I. Lenin’s launching of this phenomenon on what was to become the Soviet Socialist Republics, was, culturally speaking, a Western ‘Christian’ event from inception to demise. It was, perhaps, the greatest example of denial in modern history (and in some respects, probably still is.)
Be that as it may, Putin is spot on in his defense of a “healthy” social conservatism, and despite his (probable) lack of understanding of the Western Christian cultures’ inter-generational socialization shaping Marxism, his comparison of Soviet experiment, to the one hundred years later (today’s) Western experiment, is not that far off the mark. Both are devoid of the necessary traditions feeding the need of the human spirit. What he appears to struggle with, however unaware, is the Western cultures’ spiritual necrosis originating with Calvinism, the ‘predestination’ infection inviting discarding lived morality as a rewarded experience. This is an infection which, mutated to one form or another (like a certain virus), has crossed every social boundary and buried the ‘do no harm’ axiom across the societies of Capitalism. The root at the evil Putin senses but does not (yet) fully grasp is not actually “Cultural Marxism” but is a Calvinism rooted, Western phenomenon of society-wide psychopathy.*
“I don’t know what to do”
The “I don’t know what to do” statement by Putin about the circumstance in Ukraine concerning NATO is likely the most telling remark revealing a palpable sense of helplessness. This is where one might have expected something along the lines of a ‘zero-sum’ push-back (at the least) but that’s not what we saw. While conceding NATO showed no sign of backing off a military build-up in a context of Ukrainian citizens having little to no say over the (German & American intelligence agencies installed) Bandera putsch regime opening the door to a spear-point aimed at the heart of Russia, Putin openly admits his hesitancy. His dilemma is understandable; NATO ‘all or nothing’ approach shows no inclination whatsoever to back off incorporating to itself a military development of Ukraine and the only recourse to prevent this developing threat would be to fence NATO out with resort to combat arms. This avenue would require Putin violate international law by launching what amounts to illegal ‘preemptive war’ and it is international law Putin has been trying to rescue from obliteration by NATO and NATO aligned states. His choice? Wait the “years” it will take for the Ukrainian people/state to sort putting their house in order (defaulting to the NATO military build-up) or take Eastern Ukraine to the Dnieper river based on international law’s presumptive right of the majority ethnic Russians located there to “Self-Determination.” Putin clearly does not wish to initiate the inevitable war NATO is thrusting upon Russia; but to wait “years” (even just a few years or a year or two) is to give up strategic advantage that could cost Russia dearly. With NATO states pumping arms into Ukraine, each month that passes insures any forthcoming war will be bloodier. No doubt Sergei Shoigu will have a strong opinion in regard to NATO forcing the burden of taking this decision onto Putin.
Bloody Talons
Here we’ll conclude with the too often under-examined point of taking responsibility. It is here yours truly comes closest to outright criticism of Vladimir Putin, relating to the information wars.
This point goes to the cynicism of awarding the Nobel Prize to Novaya Gazeta’s Dmitry Muratov for “defending free speech” in the context of Russia’s recent law (mirroring USA law) requiring organizations receiving funding from abroad to register as “foreign agents.” In fact Muratov’s newspaper, Novaya Gazeta, panders to the Western political lies undermining Russia and its designation as a ‘foreign agent” is absolutely well deserved. Muratov is certainly not a Russian patriot when, as editor-in-chief of Novaya Gazeta, example given, that yellow rag publishes a hit piece pushing ‘the Russians did it’ DNC hack lie. [1], [2]
Nobel Prize for political lies? The cynicism of using non governmental organizations to embed and/or recruit agents and manipulate persons, in this case Muratov, to undermine one’s own country, is certainly nothing new in the world of espionage, where there are three basic means of penetrating and/or using an organization to one’s advantage:
1) Turning an employee through some means such as blackmail, sex, bribery or appeal to a psychological weakness such as working on someone’s conscience or ideology and convince them to become your organization’s asset (agent/traitor)
2) Using psychology and/or disinformation to convince an organization’s staff to work to your advantage and/or commit acts against its own [in this case, national] interests (false flag/sale)
3) Placing your own officer within the organization as an employee (spy)
Novaya Gazeta’s editor-in-chief Muratov STRONGLY profiles as manipulated using method 2) of the preceding, although method 1) cannot be ruled out. Coming up through Russia’s security services and fully aware of these facts, when questioned by the ‘nobel laureate’, why didn’t Putin call Muratov out at Valdai? Is it because Russia has its own filthy players in the information wars? [3], [4]
Bloody Talons
In the embedded Valdai video, Muratov questions Putin at about 1:16:00, followed by Margarita Simonyan at about 1:28:00.
Putin should have detailed why Russia hadn’t (yet) gone far enough in shutting down the poison of Western style ‘free speech’ in the information wars; but instead he deferred to the ugliest player on his team, Russian master propagandist Margarita Simonyan. What is remarkable beyond Simoyan’s obvious lust for the rank fool Muratov’s blood is her stark familiarity in her interaction with Putin on a world stage; gloating in her sense of power. Simonyan is no patriot either, Russia’s well being is not the priority here, her argument doesn’t go to the underlying facts, isn’t well thought out & reasoned, rather her first instinct is to go for Muratov’s throat. At a meta level, the premier Russian propaganda attack dog, Simonyan, profiles as a psychopath killer.
Going to the Franklin quote that introduces this essay, Putin doesn’t only carry responsibility for keeping his personal character clean, but carries responsibility for keeping a clean character within all of Russia. Putin’s professional liar, Margarita Simoyan, makes a mockery of this. A clean house does not conceal a deadly black mold in the pantry.
*A warning to Russia: A single generation of children left by their parents to be raised by an unfiltered internet in the 21st Century and you could be there too; it won’t require the 400 years it took John Calvin’s social dementia to overtake and finally poison the wider Western cultures’ mentality beyond redemption. It’s a different world now.
Nakon dve godine sedenja na pismima Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, došlo je vreme za delovanje; s obzirom na to da je nemački ambasador u Srbiji u aprilu 2021. godine izneo neke primedbe, koje je primetio zapadni korporativni medijski front:
^ Fond braće Rokfeler dodeljuje kancelariji Balkanske mreže za istraživačko izveštavanje [BIRN] u Prištini, u proseku 100.000 USD godišnje, što je samo jedan od izvora sredstava koji BIRN prikuplja iz zapadnih korporativnih velikaša [1]
Dakle, šta je nemački ambasadorski glupan imao da kaže? Uprkos tome što nije bilo zakonskog ovlašćenja Ujedinjenih nacija za NATO bombardovanje Srbije, odluka o bombardovanju Srbije…
„je morala biti doneta da bi se sprečila humanitarna katastrofa“ [2]
… ha. Ne pominje se nedavno spremanje kosovskih lidera na suđenja za ratne zločine? Oh, a šta je sa onim „ljudima“ iz BND (nemačka CIA) koji koriste Konrad Adenauer Siftung kao paravan za obuku i postavljanje neonacističkih fašista u Ukrajini? Da li ste se ikad zapitali šta bi mogli da rade u Beogradu? [3], [4]
Ne moramo putovati kroz vreme, u rane i srednje 1940-e, da bismo razumeli da „Deutschland über Alles“ u očima određenih susednih zemalja Nemačke treba gledati malo drugačije nego što bi većina današnjih običnih nemačkih smrtnika mogla pomisliti. Ali, nemački ambasador u Srbiji, Tomas Šib, nije običan nemački smrtnik, on predsedava lokacijom čiji je centar nemačkog BND (koji potiče od organizacije Gelen) u Beogradu.
U međuvremenu, pogledajmo pismo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda (prvobitni demanti) u vezi sa nekim vrlo gadnim postupcima nemačke države; to je „pranje“ ratnog zločina pod lažnom zastavom, koji je rezultirao smrću više od 1000 sirijskih civila (nastavite da čitate, predstavljeni su svi potrebni konteksti i dokazi).
Obratite pažnju na datume pisma; Međunarodni krivični sud (dalje u tekstu: ICC) je 4. jula 2018. primio žalbu, 6. februara 2019. je datum kada je ICC porekao da ima nadležnost za istragu. Ovo nije bio brz odgovor, sedam meseci ukazuje, ako ne na samoanalizu, onda barem na neko prilično vreme u razmišljanju o neophodnom okolišenju kako da se izbegne suočavanje sa izobiljem informacija iznetih pred sud. Osporio sam ovo poricanje komunikacijom (objavljenom onlajn) koja ukazuje na istoriju ICC, podložnoj neprikladnim uticajima i zahtevom da se oni preispitaju. [5]
Prvo pismo je generičko poricanje, drugo pismo je uvijeno, kako bi se objasnilo da sud smatra da su neki „ozbiljni navodi“ izvan njegovog dometa istrage:
Kada je sam Međunarodni krivični sud [ICC] saučesnik u prikrivanju ratnih zločina od strane nemačkih državnih aktera u 21. veku, svi na vrhu bi trebalo ponešto da objasne. Ukratko, ono što sledi je da postoji mnoštvo dokaza prima facie [latinski izraz: „na prvi pogled“] da je nemačka obaveštajna služba „pomagala i podržavala“ [asistirala] u prikrivanju pod lažnom zastavom hemijske napade u Siriji, uključujući i zloglasni (posebno ubilački) gasni napad sarinom na Gutu, Sirija, u avgustu 2013. godine. Ove informacije su dostavljene nemačkim parlamentarcima, kao i Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu. Nemci su ćutali, a Međunarodni krivični sud protestuje i izjavljuje da nije nadležan, prema drugom pismu:
„Tužilaštvo je pažljivo ispitalo vašu poslednju komunikaciju. Sa žaljenjem Vas obaveštavam da je tužilac potvrdio da komunikacija ne donosi nove činjenice ili dokaze koji bi promenili prethodnu odluku da ne postoji osnova za postupanje po Rimskom statutu. Prema Rimskom statutu, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo nad genocidom, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima, kako je definisano u Rimskom statutu (Članovi 6 do 8), ako su počinjeni 1. jula 2002. godine ili kasnije (Član 11).Pored toga, Sud može vršiti nadležnost samo za takva krivična dela počinjena na teritoriji države koja je prihvatila nadležnost Suda ili od strane državljanina te države (Član 12), ili kada Savet bezbednosti upućuje situaciju na Sud (Član 13). U svetlu ovih zahteva, čini se da se Vaša komunikacija, nakon pažljivog preispitivanja, i dalje odnosi na pitanja van nadležnosti Suda.
„Nadam se da ćete uvažiti da su definisanom jurisdikcijom Suda mnogi ozbiljni navodi izvan dosega ove institucije. Zahvalni smo na vašem stalnom interesovanju za Međunarodni krivični sud.“
ICC očigledno nije u pravu. I kukavički je i korumpiran. Nemačka je potpisnica ICC-a, a krivično delo pomaganja i podržavanja (prikrivanje pod lažnom zastavom) nesumnjivo ima svoje polazište u nemačkoj državi. ICC, da bi izbegao ovo (uprkos priznanju „ozbiljnih navoda“), čini se da usko definiše nadležnost (ograničavajući primenljive optužbe) za zločin počinjen u Siriji (i na taj način izbegava optužbu za pomaganje i podržavanje) i zbog toga radije negira nadležnost nego da uzburka obaveštajnu službu Nemačke (Bundesnachrichtendienst ili BND) i mezimce Angele Merkel.
Pitanje koje se postavlja u filozofiji prava je, da li sam ICC postaje saučesnik u pomaganju i podržavanju [asistiranju] navodnom prikrivanju operacije pod lažnom zastavom, očigledno namernim „uskim“ čitanjem međunarodnog prava i očigledno kukavičkim izbegavanjem da istraže krupan ratni zločin? Čini mi se, da:
Evo same žalbe, praćene mojom komunikacijom sa ICC-om koja je dovela do podnošenja prve žalbe:
Poštovano tužilaštvo pri Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu
Hvala vam na pozivu da formalizujem moju žalbu u vezi sa zločinom gasnog napada sarinom na Gutu, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.
I
Prema običajnom međunarodnom pravu, pomaganje i podržavanje ratnih zločina uključuje tri elementa:
(1) Glavno lice ili entitet počinio je ratni zločin;
(2) Drugi akter počinio je delo koje je imalo značajan efekat na izvršenje osnovnog dela; i
(3) Potrebno mentalno stanje: Drugi akter je znao da će takvo delo pomoći ili je postojala značajna verovatnoća da će pomoći izvršenju osnovnog dela.
1) Turska, država pripadnica NATO-a, preko svoje obaveštajne agencije MIT, urotila se sa al-Kaidom (predloženom tajnom članicom NATO-a) da počini ratni zločin, to jest (lažna zastava) gasni napad i usmrćivanje više od hiljadu civila u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine.
2) Službenici NATO aktera Nemačke, potpisnice Rimskog statuta, pružili su „pokriće“ propagandom i drugim, srodnim sredstvima (npr. „pranje“ lažnih informacija medijima putem parlamentarnog nadzora) omogućavajući stvarnim počiniocima da pobegnu kontroli, iako su nemački obaveštajci znali:
3) Takva radnja (prethodno pomenuta) u velikoj meri bi pomogla izvršenju navedenog zločina ili drugim rečima, omogućila nekažnjivost lažnih zastava.
Članovi 49/50/129/146 četiri Ženevske konvencije (1949) nalažu državama članicama da kazneno gone i kazne sva „lica“ koja čine teška kršenja (Ambos [2014] 146). Shodno tome, Elementi zločina Statuta ICC-a ne sadrže izričitu napomenu za kategoriju počinilaca, jer tokom pregovora na Rimskoj konferenciji nije bilo neslaganja da ratne zločine mogu počiniti i pripadnici oružanih snaga i civili (Dorman, Elementi ratnih zločina [2003] 391).
Prelazeći na neposredno prethodni (III), ovaj podnosilac predstavke Međunarodnom krivičnom sudu (Ronald Tomas Vest) drži da je osobama u bilo kojoj vladi, potpisnici Rimskog statuta, zabranjeno da pomažu i podržavaju ratni zločin ili zločin protiv čovečnosti bez obzira na zločin van nadležnosti sudova (država koja nije potpisnica) kada je pomaganje i podržavanje izvršeno u nadležnosti sudova (država potpisnica). To bi uključivalo zaposlene u obaveštajnim agencijama zapadnih demokratija i političare iz njihovih redova, koji pružaju pokriće počiniocima ratnih zločina i zločina protiv čovečnosti .
Imenovana lica nemačke savezne službe bezbednosti i odgovorni političari (Bundesnachrichtendienst) koji su proaktivno (pružali lažne informacije) ili pasivno (dozvoljavali lažne podatke) namerno pomagali i podržavali stvarne počinioce (turski MIT u partnerstvu sa al-Kaidom) (pod lažnom zastavom) gasni napad na Gutu, u Siriji u avgustu 2013. godine uključuje (ali nije ograničen na) bivšeg predsednika BND Gerharda Šindlera, sadašnjeg predsednika BND Bruna Kala, Helge Brauna (ministra nadzora) i Angelu Merkel.
Imenovane osobe koje rukovode nemačkom kancelarijom saveznog tužioca, (Generalbundesanwalt/Generalbundesanwältin) a koje nisu izvršile istraživanje i procesuiranje na domaćem i međunarodnom planu (univerzalna nadležnost za ratne zločine ili Völkerstrafgesetzbuch) su Harald Range i Peter Frank.
Imenovani nemački parlamentarci (rukovodstvo i/ili stariji članovi) koji poseduju (barem od decembra 2015. godine) oslobađajuće dokaze koji oslobađaju predsednika Bašara al Asada i njegove zvaničnike i vojsku zbog napada sarinom u Guti, u Siriji, u avgustu 2013. godine i nisu preduzeli odgovarajuće mere da nemačku obaveštajnu službu i/ili nemačke političke aktere pokore utvrđenim činjenicama prema međunarodnom pravu i, shodno tome, zaštitili su NATO aktera i njihove partnere u al-Kaidi od svetlosti, kao što su stvarni počinioci (ali ne ograničeno na) Hans-Kristijan Stroebele, Ula Jelpke, Irene Mihalic, Mihael Hartman, Armin Šuster, Norbert Lamert, Peter Hince, Johanes Singhamer, Edelgard Bulman, Ursula Šmit, Petra Pau, Klaudija Rot, Marieluise Bek, Omid Nuripur, Stefan Libih, Nils Anen, Roderih Kizeveter i Gregor Gisi.
Da bi kontekstualizovali dugu naviku zapadnih obaveštajnih agencija koje sponzorišu i/ili pomažu i podržavaju terorizam lažne zastave, preporučuje se tužilac ICC-a da pregleda istoriju GLADIO-a:
Radi šireg razumevanja osnovne ili utemeljujuće kriminalne prirode / porekla nemačkog Bundesnachrichtendienst-a, preporučuje se da tužilac ICC-a pregleda poreklo i istoriju BND-a iz organizacije Gelen:
Da bi se razumelo da nemački zvaničnici koji su trenutno na vlasti i dalje igraju podmuklo u sadašnjoj geopolitičkoj eri, daju se sledeće informacije:
Kontekstualizujući odnos obaveštajnih agencija država NATO-a (uključujući Nemačku, potpisnicu Rimskog statuta) prema hemijskim zločinima al-Kaide u Siriji, preporučuje se tužiocu ICC-a da ispita novinarstvo Vanese Belei u vezi s takozvanim Belim šlemovima:
Podržavajući izjavu turskog poslanika Erena Erdema da su „pobunjeničke“ (al-Kaida) hemikalije dopremljene iz Evrope, je ruska vojna obaveštajna služba:
Zapadne obaveštajne agencije imaju dugu istoriju nepoštene igre (kriminalne aktivnosti). U slučaju da je nemačka BND pomagala i podržavala Al-Kaidu u Siriji, postoje snažni dokazi prima facie o namernom „pranju“ lažnih informacija putem obaveštajnih podataka Saveznog nemačkog parlamenta (Bundestag) nadzorni odbor za medije koji izvršavaju prikrivanje (prikrivanje stvarnih počinilaca) ratnog zločina koji uključuje gas sarin, prema originalnim informacijama dostavljenim ICC-u sa izmenama i dopunama:
Šta se može znati naspram onoga što će se znati
Verovatno je samo pitanje vremena kada će CIA urednici na Vikipediji promeniti nedavno ažurirane informacije u gorenavedenom (kropovanom uvećanom screenshot-u) Vikipedijinom članku poslednji put ažuriranom 4. aprila 2018:
„Erdem takođe tvrdi da je sarin-gas transportovan kroz Tursku u Siriju, kasnije korišćen u hemijskom napadu na Gutu 2013. godine,kao i kasniji napadi ISIL-a na civile.Erdem je pred parlamentom pokazao slučaj gde su vođene istrage koje su dovele do hapšenja 13 potencijalnih turskih pripadnika ISIL-a, ali se kasnije neobjašnjivo od njih odustalo.
„Erdem se u Turskoj suočava sa optužbama za izdaju zbog svojih objava.“
Šta je zvanično izjavio turski član parlamenta Eren Erdem? Govoreći o kopiji (koju ima u svom posedu) krivičnog predmeta tužioca Adane 2013/120, koji su poništili Erdoganovi ljudi:
„U ovoj optužnici postoje podaci. Materijali za hemijsko oružje dovoze se u Tursku i sastavljaju u Siriji u logorima ISIS-a koji je u to vreme bio poznat kao iračka Al Kaida.
Sve ovo je otkriveno. Postoje snimci telefonskih razgovora o ovom transportovanju, poput „ne brinite o granici, mi ćemo se pobrinuti za to“, a takođe vidimo i da se koristi birokratija.
U vezi sa pošiljkom, republički tužilac u Adani, Mehmet Arıkan, izveo je operaciju i ljudi koji su umešani su zadržani. Ali, koliko razumem, on nije bio uticajna osoba u birokratiji. Nedelju dana nakon toga, imenovan je još jedan javni tužilac, preuzeo je optužnicu i svi pritvorenici su pušteni. I napustili su Tursku prelazeći sirijsku granicu.
Snimci telefonskih razgovora u optužnici pokazali su sve detalje, od načina na koji će pošiljka prevesti do toga kako će biti pripremljena, od sadržaja laboratorija do izvora materijala. Koji kamioni će se koristiti, svi datumi itd. Od A do Ž, o svemu se razgovaralo i snimalo. Uprkos svim ovim dokazima, osumnjičeni su pušteni.
I pošiljka se dogodila, jer ih niko nije zaustavio. Zbog toga je možda rezultat toga sarin koji je korišćen u Siriji.
Kada sam pročitao optužnicu, jasno sam video da ti ljudi imaju veze sa Turskim Institutom za mašinsku i hemijsku industriju i da nimalo ne brinu oko prelaska granice.
Na primer, u telefonskim zapisima Hajama Kasapa, mnogo puta ga čujete kako govori sarin gas, govoreći da su ateljei spremni za proizvodnju, materijal čeka u kamionima koji navodno voze gaziranu sodu.
Na primer, hemijski napad u Guti. Zapamtite. Tvrdilo se da iza toga stoje režimske snage. Ovaj napad izveden je samo nekoliko dana pre operacije sarinom u Turskoj.
Velika je verovatnoća da je ovaj napad izveden sa onim osnovnim materijalom koji je isporučen kroz Tursku. Kaže se da su režimske snage odgovorne, ali optužnica kaže da je to ISIS. Inspektori UN-a su otišli na lokaciju, ali nisu uspeli da pronađu nikakve dokaze. Ali u ovoj optužnici smo pronašli dokaze. Znamo ko je koristio gas sarin, a zna to i naša vlada.
Svi osnovni materijali kupuju se iz Evrope. Zapadne institucije treba da se preispitaju o tim odnosima. Zapadni izvori vrlo dobro znaju ko je izvršio gasni napad sarinom u Siriji. Oni znaju ove ljude, znaju sa kim ti ljudi rade, znaju da ti ljudi rade za Al-Kaidu. Mislim da su zapadnjaci licemerni po pitanju ove situacije.“
Šta se još može znati?
1) Rukovodstvo nemačkog parlamenta (sve političke stranke), kao i nemački savezni tužilac su obavešteni 2. decembra 2015. godine, od strane iskreno Vašeg:
Poštovani poslanici nemačkog parlamenta
Želim da skrenem pažnju na nedavne informacije u vezi sa vašim saveznikom u NATO-u,Turskom. Prošlog meseca su dva hrabra člana turskog parlamenta otkrila da u stvari iza turskih saveznih obaveštajnih službi stoje gasni napad sarinom u avgustu 2013. godine, ubivši više od hiljadu običnih Sirijaca, napad za koji su NATO države okrivile režim Bašera al-Assad. Vaš vlastiti Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) trebalo je da bude svestan ove činjenice od skoro samog početka, jer su proaktivno angažovani u Siriji i sirijskom sukobu, kao i špijunirajući Tursku.
Štaviše, državni akter Turska, koja je pokrenula napad sarinom nije neka nedokumentovana optužba. Kao što vidite iz priloženog izveštaja, turske vlasti su sprovele odgovarajuću istragu sa razvijenim dokazima i optužnicama. Žao mi je što vas obaveštavam da je, u ovom slučaju, predsednik Erdogan lično pokrenuo tužilaštvo koje se prošle nedelje pobrinulo da urednik novinskih izveštaja završi u zatvoru.
Ovo postavlja snažna pitanja o mogućem krivičnom saučesništvu BND-a, s obzirom na podršku Nemačke određenim NATO državama direktno u vezi sa sirijskim sukobom. Šta je BND znao i kada? Da li je BND, prenoseći Asadovoj opoziciji, preko svojih NATO saveznika, obaveštajne podatke o Siriji, podržao aktere koji su izvršili gasni napad na Sirijce? Da li je odnos Nemačke koja podržava vladu Erdogana zakonit, u svetlu ovih dokaza? Da li je BND doprineo geopolitičkim dezinformacijama koje Asada krive za napad sarinom iz avgusta 2013. godine? Da li je vaš parlament prevaren u ovom pitanju, posebno vaš odbor za nadzor obaveštajnih službi?
Jasno je da bi slučaj Sarin, uzevši u obzir Nemačku, kao upućenog aktera ili saučesnika u Siriji, trebalo voditi protiv Turske putem pravnog mehanizma Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, kao i domaće tužbe tih nemačkih zvaničnika, posebno napominjući BND, koji je omanuo u izveštavanju i/ili se urotio u zaveru radi prikrivanja ratnog zločina ili zločina protiv čovečnosti.
To bi trebalo da budu pitanja i zahtevi koje ćete predstaviti saveznom tužiocu.
Ron Vest
2) Nemačka obaveštajna služba (BND) lagala je odboru za nadzor rada obaveštajne službe nemačkog parlamenta:
(Preveden, obeležen tekst) „Berlin – Federalna obaveštajna služba (BND) podržava ocenu Amerikanaca da režim sirijskog predsednika Bašara al-Asada stoji iza napada otrovnim gasom u predgrađu Damaska 21. avgusta. U tajnim poverljivim izjavama za bezbednosne političare, predsednik BND Gerhard Šindler rekao je da nedostaje jasan dokaz. Nakon dubinske analize verodostojnosti, međutim, njegovo ministarstvo pretpostavlja da je krivac režim.“
Strana obaveštajna agencija zemlje, Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), slaže se sa stavom SAD-a koji smatra da je sirijski predsednik Bašar Asad odgovoran za napade otrovnim gasovima u blizini Damaska 21. avgusta. Na tajnom brifingu za odabir poslanika u ponedeljak, šef BND-a Gerhard Šindler rekao je da, iako još uvek nema neospornih dokaza, analiza dostupnih dokaza navela je njegovu obaveštajnu službu da veruje da je kriv Asadov režim.
Na brifingu je Šindler rekao da samo Asadov režim poseduje binarno hemijsko oružje poput sarina. BND veruje da bi režimski stručnjaci bili jedini sposobni za proizvodnju takvog oružja i njegovo raspoređivanje malim raketama. BND veruje da je takvo oružje korišćeno nekoliko puta pre napada 21. avgusta, za koje se veruje da je usmrtilo više od 1.400 ljudi
3) Možemo znati da je BND bolje znao zbog obaveštajnih oficira koji su bili previše glupi da bi držali jezik za zubima. U stvari BND nije nadležan samo u Siriji, BND je posvećen svrgavanju Asada:
U izveštaju se navode reči američkog obaveštajnog agenta koji kaže: „Nijedna zapadna obaveštajna služba nema tako dobre izvore u Siriji kao što ima BND.“
Član BND-a rekao je za novine da je obaveštajna služba „ponosna na važan doprinos koji je srušila Asadov režim“. Nije navedeno ime zvaničnika u izveštaju.
Ono što će se znati je, ovo su sve informacije koje su stavljene pred nemačke parlamentarce i koje su bile u njihovom posedu u poslednje dve godine, čak i dok je Angela Merkel papagajski izveštavala obaveštajne agencije „Asad je to učinio“, bez obzira što Asad to nije učinio, nikada to nije učinio.
Ono što je ružno je da nemački političari prihvataju da ih laže njihova obaveštajna agencija, a pritom drže jezik za zubima i sede na rukama dok poseduju dokaze o stvarnim počiniocima ratnog zločina.
I, ne zaboravimo da hemikalije, sirovine za izradu gasa sarina, dolaze ili su poreklom IZ EVROPE, pre tranzita preko Turske uz pomoć obaveštajne agencije NATO-a (uz saučesništvo obaveštajnih agencija, množina, BND je to zataškao) i predate su u ruke al Kaida i Islamske države.
Na šta bi trebalo da se podseti ovo prikrivanje činjenica zločina otrovnim gasom? Poreklo političke stranke Angele Merkel sa Adenauerom, koji je dočekivao naciste u redove demohrišćana? BND koji je osnovala CIA rehabilitovanjem glavnog ratnog zločinca Rajnharda Gelena? Da li je tačno da Nemačka nikada nije izgubila određenu nacističku crtu?
jul 2018., u 14:19, OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> je napsao:
Poštovani,
Hvala vam za vašu poruku. Imajte na umu da Međunarodni krivični sud ima vrlo ograničenu nadležnost. Sud se može baviti samo zločinima genocida, zločinima protiv čovečnosti i ratnim zločinima kako su definisani članovima 6 do 8 Rimskog statuta koji su se dogodili posle 2002, i može vršiti jurisdikciju samo u zemljama koje su ga ratifikovale. Za više informacija o nadležnosti Suda i pun tekst Rimskog statuta, pogledajte stranicu 2 priloženog dokumenta i našu veb stranicu, kao i našu adresu, http://www.icc-cpi.int. Savetujemo vam da pažljivo pregledate ove informacije.
Ako i nakon pažljivog pregleda i dalje smatrate da je ICC pravo mesto za vaš slučaj i želite da podnesete zahtev Sudu, sledite uputstva kako to učiniti na stranici 1 priloženog dokumenta. Ako odlučite da pošaljete informacije, koristite samo ovu adresu e-pošte: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.
Srdačan pozdrav,
OTP informativni desk
Međunarodni krivični sud
Korekcija 5. jula 2018., u odeljku IV, ime Gerhard Šreder, ispravljeno je u Gerhard Šindler (bivši predsednik BND-a). ICC je obavešten o ovoj ispravci.
Ažuriranje od 9. jula 2018.: Sledeća komunikacija primljena od ICC-a:
Hag, 9. jula 2018.
Poštovani,
Tužilaštvo Međunarodnog krivičnog suda potvrđuje prijem vaših dokumenata / pisma.
Ova komunikacija je uredno uneta u Registar komunikacija Zavoda. Razmotrićemo ovu komunikaciju, prema potrebi, u skladu sa odredbama Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda.
Imajte na umu da ovo potvrdno pismo ne znači da je istraga otvorena, niti da će istragu otvoriti Tužilaštvo.
Čim se donese odluka, obavestićemo vas, u pisanoj formi, i dostaviti vam razloge za ovu odluku.
Iskreno Vaš,
Mark P. Dilon, šef jedinice za informacije i dokaze
Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.
Update 15 January 2022: I’m not so optimistic now. Anything could happen including Russia initiating a preemptive strike and the entire business spiraling out of control per the more recent assessments and escalating hostility of Russia in the face of NATO’s perennial (and disingenuous) ‘let’s talk’ stalling tactics as Russia is backed up against the wall by NATO advanced weapon systems deployments in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, this article is still worth a read:
“We see 100,000 ukrop troops on the Front, scores of trainloads of troops, armor, ammo and fuel moved into the Donbass region, we hear the heated rhetoric, the preparations for war on both sides of the info sphere”
Or so states my well connected source in Donbass, speaking of activities on either side of the (momentarily) ‘frozen’ conflict. Never mind the Ukrainian military has been shelling the ethnic Russian ‘separatists’ with heavy artillery for weeks (a small detail neglected in Western press.)
When the shit hits the fan on the Donbass (Eastern Ukraine) battlefields again, it will be a ‘surprise’ and no doubt posed in Western press as a pre-planned ‘act of treachery’ by the ‘Perennially evil Putin’ in the next gambit of the ‘Great Game’ by empire (NATO.)
NATO actually doesn’t give a rats ass for Ukraine other than to use the dumber than f**k nazis (they’d put in charge in the 2014 coup) as cannon fodder to injure & make Russia into a boogeyman. Götterdämmerung? Well, the Western states running with a 19th Century empire mentality in a highly unstable 21st Century always poses the possibility but probably not (yet.) The European NATO states are in no shape to take on Russia, never-minding Russia has no inclination to reoccupy Europe. Of course, as well Russia cannot stand by and allow Kiev to run over the ethnic Russian majority East of the Dnieper river and open to NATO a corridor on the border of Russia’s European heartland. Russia WILL defend the Donbass.
Everyone knows (West & East) that Ukraine is not a viable state as constituted; the Western (Ruthenian) people (especially along the border with Poland) have been long subverted away from their Orthodox roots and are unrecognizable as the same ethnic people (Rusyn) in Belarus, Hungary, Serbia and trans-Carpathia in Ukraine. These people (Ruthenian-Rusyn) have been targeted by cultural subversion for a couple of hundred years in Catholic associated empire (Habsburg, et al) efforts to wrest their identity away from Kievian Rus and ethnic/cultural kinship with Russia. There is really little new in this; a historical inheritance predating the Nazi proper invasion and predating Napoleon’s invasion of Russia back to the Swedish invasion at the beginning of the 18th Century. Western empire in several incarnations have coveted Russia for over three centuries, and the Western Ukrainians (ethnic Ruthenians, actually) would be naturally aligned with the Polish who’d Catholicized them and it should come as little surprise these people sided with the Nazis (proper) in WWII because they cannot be rehabilitated in any sense of coexistence with Russia and Russians.
It is in the region of the Polish border where the Ukrainian (Nazi collaborator) Stephan Bandera nazi element/legacy is absolutely entrenched (formerly Orthodox but now ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholics answering to Rome), a community deeply saturated with antipathy to Russia and these ‘people’ (if they can recalled that) will never integrate to a Ukraine of the East with its majority ethnic Russian (Orthodox) population. Both sides (NATO/Russia) know this.
Rather than negotiate a reasonable divorce that would split Ukraine into two states with the Dnieper River as the rough boundary (Kiev and Odessa should be in the East) along ethnic lines, NATO simply intends the inevitable Ukraine breakup will happen in such a way as to make Russia into the Western Press’ boogeyman.
I doubt it’s going to lead to WWIII, Europe isn’t ready for this war, it’ll likely just work out as an expensive exercise to make Russia into the villain, little more than that. How much territory Russia will take will depend on kinetic developments to some extent… but I expect Kiev and Odessa could easily be annexed to Russia (perhaps later divided between Russia and a ‘proper’ Ukraine.) There’s possibility of a triple partition; in general terms an ethnic Ruthenian Western (Poland border area) ‘nazified’ sector nobody will want, a central sector populated in majority by proper ethnic Ukrainians and East of the Dnieper which is largely ethnic Russian majority.
The nazis (literally represented in Azov Battalion et al) will begin their offensive and the Russian army will outflank the Donbass front and cut off the Ukrainian supply lines (taking Kiev in the process) and NATO, after having pumped in enough weapons and munitions to insure a bloodbath, will allow the Ukrainian military to be crushed. This will be the West’s convenient means of disposing of the most radical (out of the closet) nazis, a big no-no (the 21st Century’s nazi meme in the guise of NATO disallows flying any flag except the false flag of democracy.)
No matter the immense amount of casualties this will cause, ‘the more blood the better’ from the Western intelligence agencies propaganda apparatchiks point of view as the entire Western world is propagandized concerning ‘Evil Putin’ and ‘crude Russian aggression.’ Thus, the de facto split of Ukraine is accomplished in a comic strip written by Satan where Western Ukraine (what Russia won’t care to absorb) will be propped up by the West with psychologically infantile territorial claim over a Russian population they had terrorized since February 2014.
Russia will be compelled to defend the Donbass, but for appearances (international law) sake, will have to let the nazis initiate the war, resulting in much higher casualties. ‘Preemptive War’ is an international law oxymoron embraced solely by lawless regimes and adhering to the law is a disadvantage Russia will overcome in it’s impatience that finally decides the most economical means of settling the issue is to evict the nazis altogether from territory East of the Dnieper. Of course the West’s propagandists will take this opportunity to convince its gullible populations ‘Russia’s aggression’ justifies immense, new and limitless armaments purchases in a spiraling out of control geopolitical tension that must inevitably lead to the West’s Götterdämmerung after all.
*
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
The President of Serbia proposes and the Prime Minister initiates the following individual legislative acts in precisely this order:
1) The Serbian province of Kosovo is partitioned by Serbia’s National Legislature to effect removing the ethnic Serb majority region of Mitrovica from the Province of Kosovo, where Mitrovica becomes its own administrative district joined to Sumadia & Western Serbia.
2) The south of the Serbian Province of Kosovo region of Metohija inclusive of any adjoining/adjacent ethnic Serbian (includes those non-Orthodox minorities who traditionally identify as Serbs) majority lands shall become the Autonomous Serbian Exclave of Metohija & Old Serbia.
3) Serbia recognizes Republika Srpska’s “Right of Self Determination of Peoples” as a right to join with Serbia, especially as provided for in foundational (preambles) law of relevant United Nations Multilateral Treaties.
4) A resolution: when these preceding are backed by The European Union, Berlin, and other interested parties per International Law, and furthermore, functionally honored by the de facto government at Pristina, Serbia’s Constitution will be amended to recognize an independent Kosovo.
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Decolonization as envisioned by the United Nations is (in real effect) little more than a self-serving Western propaganda ploy; assuaging ego where there is in fact little wider social consciousness of what (and what has not) been accomplished. To achieve de facto (authentic) decolonization, to begin, this should require the decolonization of the psyche of those ‘indigenous’ populations educated into Western way of thinking. This would be no mean task!
When the colonizing powers ‘withdrew’ and ‘lip-serviced’ (should sound like political fellatio) ‘the right of self determination of peoples’ … they left intact unnatural colonial borders that in any case DID NOT respect the purported right of self-determination, rather put in place multiple Western infected national psyches within so-called ‘indigenous’ leadership determined to (more often than not) behave like Whitemen (Western European mentality.) This has further created numerous cases of social friction across the globe, particularly concerning so-called ‘minorities.’
The related ‘meme of democracy’ has accomplished the following few examples of too many examples to list in one short article:
The largest stateless ‘minority’ in the world (5,000,000 compared to ‘sovereign’ Montenegro’s 500,000), that is the Kurds, are in (varying degrees of) conflict with Iran, Iraq, Syria and (not least) Turkey, due to persisting colonial borders. This leaves the Kurd population open (across several vectors) to murderous geopolitical (read intelligence agency) manipulations in endless iterations (most recently by the USA & Israel.)
In the so-called ‘international law’ (a Western developed concept) Azerbaijan is allowed an Azerbaijani majority exclave, Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, separated by the territory of Armenia, but Armenia is NOT allowed an Armenian majority exclave, Nagorno-Karabakh, separated by the territory of Azerbaijan. Common sense calls this hypocrisy. Common people adhere to common sense and the Armenian common sense is cynically exploited in Ottoman imperial style geopolitical machinations:
So, what would be the point of common sense (a gift of our creator) in the view of those who propose to rule us? I doubt they could answer this question in any sensible (read honest) way for the fact there is no sensible or (especially) altruistic justification of the preceding. Any honest answer would have to take in account incompetence, greed & political-cultural narcissism (imperial arrogance) often prohibits the de facto right of self determination of peoples, any pretensions of decolonization at the United Nations notwithstanding.
In light of the preceding, just suppose (a laughable fantasy) the West were to take up Russia on an offer to repeat the plebiscite in Crimea with international observers; a plebiscite is the most democratic of all democratic principles. The obvious outcome would be (and why the ‘democratic’ West would never agree to this proposition) Crimeans would overwhelmingly (again) exercise their right of self determination to join the Russian Federation. Furthermore, the whole (majority ethnic Russian) East of Ukraine might then demand equal right to determine its own future and wellah, suddenly Putin’s Russian borders extend West to the Dnieper River. The Western states insistence Crimea remain a part of Ukraine is a case of the West maintaining a stance of ‘democracy for me, but not for thee.’
Meanwhile, the crude Spanish judicial system (dominated by judges aligned with the Popular Party, a political legacy of Franco) has jailed and continues to bring to trial those Catalan separatists who dared do what? They held a plebiscite (that most democratic of all democratic principles) to separate Catalonia from Spain (a state that has historically treated the Catalans as lackeys only fit to lick the Spanish boot.)
To keep this short, we’ll jump to Kosovo; where the Western states (NATO & the EU) has determined Serbia is not fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Albanians) on their own territory but the now purported (by the West) independent Kosovo is fit to govern a minority (of ethnic Serbs.) Never mind the inconvenient fact that recent Kosovo ‘leaders’ are being arrested and delivered to international tribunal for crimes against ethnic Serbs (includes organ harvesting), also not to mention the 250,000 Serbs driven from Kosovo in an ethnic cleansing pogrom following the NATO bombing of Serbia. Hey! Isn’t that just the sort of act the bombing was supposed to stop? NATO ‘just allowed’ that to happen when they’d grabbed control? Huh. Maybe that Albanian ‘majority’ wasn’t statistically big enough to justify an independent Kosovo (and secure Kosovo a ‘right’ to host Camp Bondsteel.)
All of this follows on a few historical facts overlooked by the Western propaganda machine; Eastern Orthodoxy’s majority Serbian population in the region of Srpska Krajina recently (90s Balkan Wars) ethnically cleansed from Catholic Croatia by “Operation Storm” (never mind the Serbs have been made the boogeyman for everything that went wrong with the breakup of Yugoslavia), as well the fact unnatural ethnic borders have been enforced in relation to Republik Srpska, ensuring there will be ongoing tensions within Bosnia on the border of Serbia and not least, the remnant Serb majority region in the North of Kosovo is denied their right of self determination to join with Serbia, ensuring perpetual inter-ethnic conflict that serves only to weaken the institutions of state via ongoing radicalization of both populations, Orthodox Christian Serb and Muslim Albanian. Europe couldn’t do a better job of promoting a war of civilizations if it had actually tried, if one were to presume it is mere incompetence derived from ego-narcissism has birthed this circumstance into the present. But maybe it is more than that, a weakened state with artificial borders is ‘low hanging fruit’ posing possibility of consolidating control over a region culturally tied to Russia (as well historically coveted by the Catholic headquarters at Rome.)
Finally, it must be noted that, similar to the Sioux Indians had founded their culture upon a spiritual relationship to the Black Hills of South Dakota from which they had been expelled, Serbia’s relationship to “Old Serbia” (Kosovo) is little different; but imperial ambition had seen the Serbs ethnically cleansed by the Albanians on multiple occasions, first under the ‘patronage’ of the Ottoman Turks, then the Albanians were backed in further pursuing pogroms against Serbs by the fascist Axis powers of World War II (similar to Croatian Ustasha persecution of Serbs during the war) and finally a coup de grace of sorts was delivered by communism under Tito, who forbade ethnic Serbs to return to their homes in Kosovo following 1945. [1]
The epilogue to all of this would be the colonizing of Serbia by the European Union at the point of a gun:
^ Ursula von der Leyen
Maybe the title of this piece should have been ‘Recolonization.’
*
“In any democracy, ethics, self restraint, tolerance & honesty will always take a second seat to narcissism, avarice, bigotry & persecution, if only because people who play by the rules in any democracy are at a disadvantage to those who easily subvert the rules to their own advantage” (Ronald’s Maxim)
“I Said No”
The Self-Deceit & Defeat of Aleksandar Vucic
“It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind, as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime” -Thomas Paine
Serbia’s President Vucic met Trump at the White House and came away with a ‘small victory.’ Or so he seems to think. This self-annointed, clueless king needs a new vizier:
“I said ‘no’ at the toughest place in the world.
“Now I can officially say that I said what I said regarding recognizing Kosovo at the most difficult place in the world. In the room where I was sitting, there were Pence, Kushner, Johnson, Grenell, O’Brien, a hundred times more powerful people than me. This was a problem for them. I’m not interested in form and chairs” -Aleksandar Vucic [1]
Well, I think Vucic should have been interested in the visual message of the ‘chair’ he’d sent around the world when his “No” had (in actuality) multiplied into entirely too many cases of ‘Yes’ recalling this next image:
^ Aleksandar Vucic meets ‘Trump in drag’
In short, Vucic was out of his league and got ‘played.’ Now he has to explain away what he had signed:
What Trump’s cabal of criminals perfectly understood when they invited Vucic to Washington was, that Vucic would absolutely be required (a small matter of domestic politics) to say “No” to the constitutionally prohibited explicit recognition of Kosovo as an independent state. [2]
After the Americans placing precisely that (recognition of Kosovo as an independent state) in the initial draft, the ‘bait and switch’ was delivered; Vucic got the ‘Point 10’ or explicit recognition of Kosovo independence removed, only to be provided a document with thinly concealed recognition of Kosovo as an independent state or (that is to say) a document with multiple cases of implicit recognition of Kosovo independence. Then, our ill-advised King Vucic was so relieved at Point 10 having been removed, he signed it. His Vizier failed him.
Now, let’s have a bit of a closer look.
Implementation of joint infrastructure agreements (highway, railroad ect) with a political entity that presently controls, and seeks the independence of Kosovo, equals implicit recognition of an independent Kosovo; the legal point here is, this act confers legitimacy on a political force in violation of the Serbian constitution but nevertheless subjects Serbia to principles of international law. Much of what follows would be subject to the same principle where one cannot do any ‘de jure’ business with an entity and subsequently claim that same entity has no legal competence (the international law’s ‘rule of reciprocity.’) [3]
Joint operation of the Merdare ‘common crossing point’ will be read (in future) as a strong indicator Serbia recognizes Merdare as an international border crossing per the principle laid out in the preceding paragraph (reciprocity) for the simple fact the administration on the Kosovo side considers itself an independent state.
Serbia and Kosovo separately joining the ‘Mini-Schengen Zone’ is outright de facto recognition of Kosovo as an independent state. In a case where Serbia did NOT recognize Kosovo’s independence, Kosovo could only enter the ‘Mini Schengen’ as a part of Serbia with Mini Schengen consisting solely of Albania, Macedonia & Serbia. Mini-Schengen is proposed as a trade association of independent states. Serbia agreeing to sign on to Mini Schengen as a peer to Kosovo is practically a recognition of independence given to Kosovo.
Accepting the US Department of Energy to draw up plans to “share” Lake Gazivoda is a strongly implicit recognition of Kosovo’s independence, because as a matter of fact a nation-state does not ‘share’ its water with a territory on peer terms except that territory were an independent state. If Serbia were sovereign over Kosovo, it would not ‘share’ but ‘assign’ water to that province.
Agreeing to refrain from any action communicating to other nations that Kosovo should not be recognized as an independent state speaks for itself.
Other points:
Diversifying energy supplies, example given, sets up possibility of taking business concessions from state controlled corporations like Gazprom and giving them to utterly uncontrolled and ruthless outlaw Western corporations like Chevron (the language is too broad & non-specific.) [4], [5]
Giving an “An international, US International Development Finance Corporation full time presence in Belgrade, Serbia” accomplishes two things, neither good for Serbia. 1) this will give the American corporate oligarchs an inside track on the privatization of what remains of Serbia’s state owned assets and 2) will give the Central Intelligence Agency a parallel track to penetrate every aspect of Serbia’s economy; pointing to the US International Development Finance Corporation is a USA government subsidiary of USAID. USAID is at the nexus of American ‘color revolution’ policies and firmly grounded in CIA history where the clandestine ‘Operations Division’ does NOT support American democratic principles (the USAID cover story) but in actuality supports acquisition and control of resources & markets by major American corporations. [6], [7]
Demanding Serbia dismantle its 5G is the USA using Serbia to stick a thumb in the eye of China.
Enhanced airline passenger & crime information sharing with the Pristina criminals who should be in a cell at the Hague, together with the entity (USA intelligence services) that created al-Qaida, is nothing short of a bad cosmic joke. What crime groups will that information be shared with? How will it compromise Serbia’s security structures?
The next bad joke is the idea there can be sincere “interfaith dialogue” with Salafi & Wahhabi radicals, currently free to proselytize throughout Kosovo. [8]
The bad joke after that is a double: concerning locating missing bodies, do you suppose ‘Pristina’ is going to locate and repatriate bodies of Serbs disappeared and harvested for organs? Who would believe that? The other problem with ‘reconciliation’ is the idea dislocated Serbs are going to be welcomed back and their properties restored; this had already been a demand of the UN for two decades with practically nothing more accomplished than ongoing abuse of those Serbs who did not (yet) leave Kosovo. [9], [10]
^ It’s not the ethnic Serbs in helmets & masks with weapons
The Western model that legalizes homosexuality practically demands ‘gay evangelism’ that radicalizes conservative societies into opposition. Serbia should be careful with Richard Grenell’s pet point; it is one thing to be tolerant, it is another thing altogether to push homosexuality in a culture’s face, a habit of numerous Western societies. Serbia risks unnecessarily alienating other nations with this agreement’s paragraph made with a gun pushed against Serbia’s back. And the joke element: what fool would believe for one millisecond that Kosovo’s growing Salafi society will do anything but de facto criminalize homosexuality in actual social practice? [11]
Certainly Serbia’s nasty reputation for trafficking weapons to proxy terrorist organizations should not benefit Hezbollah (or otherwise benefit any de facto warring party in the Middle East) but there is a magnificent hypocrisy in the demand by the USA that Serbia must ban Hezbollah, when it was the USA created al-Qaida (which splintered, one faction becoming Islamic State), with the USA now dictating who is a terrorist organization. [12], [13]
Finally, Serbia’s reward that came with Vucic agreeing to move Serbia’s embassy to Jerusalem was delivered within the hour of his signing; when Israel recognized Kosovo as an independent, sovereign nation and the humiliation was complete. [14]
Glenn Greenwald at The Intercept calls out the New York Times journalists exposing ‘fake news’ by pointing out they’re plagiarizing Russian media on what actually happened with the torched ‘humanitarian aid’ at the Venezuela-Colombia border. Huh? Yeah, it’s a head-scratch worthy of a political chimp, because Greenwald DOES NOT explore the most important question: who benefits from the NYT story in media that (Greenwald acknowledges) might as well be outright owned by the (deep) state. The real story here? White House occupying Kissinger-philosophy-neocon-Christian-Zionist-Pentagon centered ‘national security’ clique 0 – 1 wannabe White House occupying Brzezinski-philosophy-neoliberal-globalist-CIA centered ‘national security’ clique (noting there is some overlay between cliques from their respective bases of power.)
Russian media prints what you won’t see in your everyday liberal democracies’ newspaper; British intelligence had proposed a plan to massacre Catholic schoolchildren in Northern Ireland but this was a reach too far, even for the Ulster Protestant extremists:
These stories typically come out when it is far past time to bring the perpetrators to justice (dead or fear dying with guilty conscience) but this next one points to the British-USA skullduggery going on in the here and now:
Per the preceding story, I don’t expect for one minute Trump is clean (and it does not bode well a blackmail susceptible reality TV freak is POTUS) but he’s a petty criminal character by comparison to what’s covered up at the United States Department of Justice.
Going to this next, in the absence of accountability for billionaires playing with technological fire and tampering with reality in ways risking us all, I’d support a constitutional amendment allowing a bill of attainder authorizing the forever jailing of Elon Musk:
A former Special Forces Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald is published in International Law as a layman (The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole) and has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
We begin with the straw man (or men.) Finally it has come to a time of accepting the Western political leadership is, in and of itself, a criminal class and the model of democracy a criminal model. It’d be better to return to the drawing board in the human experiment concerning social governance, whether political or religious, because:
In any democracy, ethics, self restraint, tolerance and honesty will always take a second seat to narcissism, avarice, bigotry & persecution, if only because people who play by the rules in any democracy are at a disadvantage to those who easily subvert the rules to their own advantage (Ronald’s Maxim)
Straw man number one: Hate crime and people preserving ‘original sin’ as a cultural motif in the living oxymoron of deciding what is hate. Example in American Christian culture would be the ‘hate watchdog’ Southern Poverty Law Center doesn’t touch the neo-Platonic pederasty that is the Catholic church where theology holds women can never be priests for the proposed ‘fact’ of Eve seducing Adam on behalf of evil. That’s not a ‘hate crime’ ?
This only get better (worse, actually) in a culture incompatible with its pretensions; where Saul of Tarsus (a.k.a. St Paul) demands all of creation is dirtied by original sin and ruled by Satan. [1] Thusly what ‘Saint Paul’ taught (part & parcel of a mythology superimposed on the historical Jesus) [2] is allowed to be shoved in people’s faces across the planet (the ‘Great Commission’), where it is proposed if you don’t accept being “covered in the blood of Jesus” (because you are dirty) you will burn for eternity and this isn’t a hate crime? If St Paul wasn’t the first self-hating human, certainly he is among history’s greatest of self-hating humans and it should say a lot he is a driving icon motivating Mike Pompeo and Mike Pence. When it comes to these Christian Zionists empowering Israel’s miscreant geopolitical behaviors, Bibi Netanyahu is a petty criminal by comparison. There is no related hate crimes noticeable by the Southern Poverty Law Center in regards to Mike Pompeo stating:
“we make sure that we pray and stand and fight and make sure that we know that Jesus Christ is our savior is truly the only solution for our world” -Mike Pompeo
Yes truly, this is the only solution backed by the usual suspects of empire killing people across the globe … and if you don’t play their game (practice their murderous brand of Christianity) [3] you’re not among the ‘new chosen’ and undeserving of not only privilege but your life is lesser than what ‘goy’ is to the ‘original chosen.’ A ‘heads up’ for Phil Giraldi [4] the fact of sixty million American Zionist Christians (one in four Americans who identify as Christian) pushing for a ‘Greater Israel’ tells me ‘Jews are the problem’ is a straw man. [5] In fact historically it has been Jews, not Jesuits, working to preserve the American constitution and the USA’s (none the less failed) adherence to the rule of law. [6]
We can close the preceding bit on the Americans with an ‘honorable mention’ (that’s irony, for those readers with a thick noggin) awarded to the American Civil Liberties Union for defending American Nazi hate speech (with no problems from the Southern Poverty Law Center) and now we’ll move on to the ‘mental midget’ Macron and his ‘anti-Zionism’ is ‘anti-Semitism’ straw man. [7]
“Anti-Zionism is one of the modern forms of anti-Semitism. Behind the negation of Israel’s existence, what is hiding is the hatred of Jews” -Emmanuel Macron
Now, just wait one f**king minute. Anti-Zionism could be an irrational hatred of Rastafarians. Anti-Zionism could be a VERY HEALTHY opposition to the religious (and closet political) agenda of Mike Pompeo & Mike Pence and their cult motivated ‘end of days’ apocalyptic vision [8] set in the Middle East based on ‘Bible Prophecy’ … and related policies supporting the Israeli religious right stoking tensions throughout the region. Anti-Zionism could also be support for international law denying the illegal occupation and annexation of East Jerusalem and Golan (with the West Bank likely to follow) where the Israeli political right is motivated to sleight of hand territorial ambitions in pursuit of a ‘Greater Israel.’
Allowing Macron to define anti-Semitism per his preceding quote (straw man) would be to give Bibi Netanyahu and his über-right alliance cover for pursuit of the (patently illegal) Greater Israel; where as of February 2019 everyone who’d been identified as “Anti-Zionist” while opposing the Greater Israel project (but not Israel within its United Nations established borders) can now be smeared as anti-Semite. Perhaps few, if any, greater favors had been done for the criminal element in Jewish Zionism and the historical fraud of Ben Gurion, whose admitted disingenuous acceptance of Israel’s lawful borders were a means to an end: in a drive to establish Israel beyond its lawful boundaries. [9]
How is it Macron had suddenly decided to ‘gift’ the criminal element within Zionism a world class opportunity to smear that very criminal element’s enemies? The answer is obvious and straightforward; the Jesuit educated, anti-Semite Macron had ‘stepped on his dick’ (an American military expression) when he’d proposed to rehabilitate Vichy France leader (Nazi collaborator who ‘led’ France during the terror of Klaus Barbie) Marshal Petain [10] and set himself up for blackmail.
A consummate criminal politician of the Western stripe, the blackmailed Macron then performed political fellatio on some one certain actor (likely MOSSAD leapt at the opportunity) to save his career; and the President of the Fifth Republic has now defined the ultimately sane element in anti-Zionism as anti-Semitic.
As for the rest of the story, here is example of everything you need to know about threats MOSSAD is capable of carrying through, a straw-man, and what the Macron ‘legacy’ might have faced:
“Emmanuel Macron was found dead in his home after having sex with a scarecrow that he had dressed up in a wig, lipstick and strap-on sex toy.
“The molested remains of Macron’s scarecrow were discovered in his home after neighbours reported a foul smell coming from the building.
“Police forced their way into Macron’s private home in a Paris suburb, and were stunned to discover the 40-year-old politician lying dead.
“Next to him lay a scarecrow that had been dressed up as a woman – but wearing a strap-on sex toy.
“Bernard Bajolet, a spokesman for the prosecutor, said: “We initially thought there were two bodies but then realised one was a scarecrow wearing lipstick and a long-haired wig.
“It was lying next to the deceased and had a six-inch strap-on penis.
“There were no signs of violence and we are working on the assumption that Macron died during sex with his scarecrow” [11]
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Behind“the theology underpinning the Left Behind series promotes a “skewed view of the Christian faith that welcomes war and disaster, while dismissing peace efforts in the Middle East and elsewhere—all in the name of Christ”
A former Special Forces Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald is published in International Law as a layman (The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole) and has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Ronald Thomas West 