My 1st experience with inspectors general was in 1971 Vietnam where the soldier’s complaints, that our good cafeteria food was being sold through military organized crime to markets and restaurants in the city of Vung Tau, were absolutely covered up by the military watchdog. When a congressman actually showed up to discover for himself what was going on, our meals became excellent for just a few days and then, with the congressman’s departure, our food reverted to nearly inedible survival rations.
My next experience with attorney generals was when investigating a criminal ring working the inside of government for Chevron Corporation, counterfeiting environmental impact statements for purpose of allowing oil and gas development to proceed in areas that should have been protected.
When provided hard documentation of multiple instance of the Forest Service inside cheating (the FBI refused to investigate) of laws to benefit the outside industry, the Department of Agriculture Inspector General simply evaded responsibility by pointing out these issues had been brought up in another bureaucratic channel in an appeal (to be decided by the Forest Service!)
So now, all of these years later, Trump fires the Department of State’s Inspector General Steve Linick and ‘Corona Trillions’ overseer (former Department of Justice Inspector General) Glenn Fine and it all still ties into my experience with the preceding case of the Forest Service, nearly thirty years on.
In short, after Chevron insider Condoleezza Rice became Bush Jr’s National Security Advisor, it would seem a ‘Chevron enemies’ list had transferred to the USA executive branch. It was in 2004 my house was searched without a warrant (while I was out of town) and it had become clear multiple investigations had been opened into my activities with specious rationale or on false pretexts.
This seemed odd as my investigative career had been closed for five years and it been thirteen years since the incriminating, investigative dossier on Chevron had been compiled and forwarded through several official channels. Looking into matters, by 2005 it became clear the source of the present harassment stemmed via local members of the Council on Foreign Relations, leaning on the area’s FBI field office and local law enforcement.
By 2006 it was determined by myself this was developing into one of those circumstance where the target (myself) was high priority and it would be best to get out of the USA.
My house sold in the early summer of 2007 and I left the USA on the pretext of attending a conference at Johannes Gutenberg University, but did not catch my return flight from Europe, and the attempted assassination game was on.
Glenn Fine was Department of Justice Inspector General in 2010 when I attempted to bring my case of the FBI apparently assisting the CIA (and possibly MOSSAD) with attempted assassination of myself. This stemmed from my work on the 1991 Chevron & Forest Service misconduct previously mentioned.
My experience with inspector generals is that of a rank fail, relating to the FBI’s egregious conduct in ‘investigating’ myself actually appears to have been opening my banking information (via ‘national security letter’) to Central Intelligence so my location could be tracked by ATM while I was on the run in Europe from Condoleezza’s (as far as it could be traced to the top) ‘kill list’ (prior to Obama and his Brennan kill list.)
When Obama came into office, the presidential ‘kill list’ became a matter of public record. There has been no known investigation into this by any inspector general, either Department of Justice or Department of State. My own case is well known in detail with as yet unanswered (after 10 years) request for a Department Of Justice Inspector General (Glenn Fine in 2010) look at my circumstance on Obama’s watch. Certainly in some circumstance the duopoly has each others’ backs.
What’s more is, during the tenure of Steve Linick, the Department of State’s Office of the Inspector General has made it as burdensome as possible to actually make contact and pursue whistle-blowing with a closed email system that refuses to recognize ‘unauthorized’ contacts (i.e. anyone outside the system or anyone who hasn’t been extended the ‘grace’ of their email address admitted into the system) rather demanding all process concerning complaints and related documentation be sent and replies accepted by fax or snail mail which (probably by design) insures the geolocation of the whistle-blower.
Even with the valid email address of the appropriate government officials to contact, if your email address is either unrecognized or recognized as someone they do not wish to interact with, the closed system will not allow your messages through. This was discovered by myself when I looked into making a complaint concerning egregious misconduct by certain Department of State officers when applying for routine services of a personal, family nature I will not divulge here.
These officers (almost certainly CIA under official cover) were so determined to deny certain rights in attempt to force me to present myself in person, the end result is, there are two diametrically opposed decisions by separate USA embassies in two countries in Europe, one granting and the other denying, identical citizen services based on decisions where the one embassy granted the service based on lesser documentation than the embassy that denied the identical service based on stronger documentation!
The difference in the embassies? The granting embassy is in a ‘settled’ western European country where highly competent local professionals are incorporated into the citizen services staff in a small annex that would basically make a rendition impossible, whereas the denying embassy is a CIA infested organism located in a former socialist state that is a target of empire’s demands to conform, where there is a weak rule of law and the citizens services is located in a very large embassy compound from which renditions can be made with impunity.
Ultimately I declined to exercise my right to make a complaint of egregious misconduct by the Department of State to Steve Linick, fully understanding it would be an energy draining exercise in futility.
Essentially, the demand is, if you are the target of the USA, live in a former socialist state under threat of color revolution and also happen to be a USA citizen filing a complaint, paint a bull’s eye on your chest and only then step up with your incriminating information when whistle-blowing to the Department of State Inspector General.
What is different with the inspector generals now is, there is a deep state internecine war with the more overt evangelical/Israeli alliance pitted against the neo-liberal/never-Trump Republican alliance. But on either side, they are all bought and paid for American political pit bulls fighting behind the scenes in off record venues. Without exception, they’re all corrupt.
The difference between American empire run by Democrats & ‘Never Trump!’ Republicans versus the Christian Zionists & Israeli controlled Trump, is the difference between botched operations with & without anesthesia; with the former, the numb but nevertheless soon to be cadaver, lingers just a little longer, with the latter, panic, pain & shock contributes to a bit quicker demise.
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Any anonymous ‘state secrets’ (e.g. FBI fronting for CIA) finger
On the FBI’s fraudulent application for a FISA secret warrant (authorization to spy) on Carter Page: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s ‘cover your ass’ Order Misc. 19-02 finding of fact:
“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable. The FISC expects the government to provide complete and accurate information in every filing with the Court. Without it, the FISC cannot properly ensure that the government conducts electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes only when there is a sufficient factual basis”
That is why we ‘had’ a (‘lip serviced’ or given political fellatio by the court) so-called ‘Bill of Rights’ that went out the window with the National Security Act of 1947 (the underlying foundation of the FISA Court.) In fact there is not, and has never been, an advocate (sound legal mechanism) to insure the American citizen ‘targets’ of FISA court secret warrants are properly protected, via right of discovery demanding exculpatory evidence, and placing the Department of Justice personalities, the FBI particularly, squarely in the sights of prosecution for the above described or what amount to ‘color of law’ violations of Fourth Amendment and other rights. Now, on to the abject failure of what has been ordered:
“THEREFORE, the Court ORDERS that the government shall, no later than January 10, 2020, inform the Court in a sworn written submission of what it has done, and plans to do, to ensure that the statement of facts in each FBI application accurately and completely reflects information possessed by the FBI that is material to any issue presented by the application. In the event that the FBI at the time of that submission is not yet able to perform any of the planned steps described in the submission, it shall also include (a) a proposed timetable for implementing such measures and (b) an explanation of why, in the government’s view, the information in FBI applications submitted in the interim should be regarded as reliable”
We can put one + one together and see the how the math doesn’t stack up in a constitutionally sound way:
In the finding of fact: “…representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable” clearly casts doubt on the entire process and every FISA application ever made (noting the court has processed thousands of applications with a history of rejecting a handful.)
+
In the actual court order section we see “…an explanation of why, in the government’s view, the information in FBI applications submitted in the interim should be regarded as reliable” or essentially only a demand of from this point (date of the order, 17 December 2019) in any pending or future application will there be any correction made in circumstance of the FISA Court demanding the FBI ‘police themselves.’
Since when (post King George III our sovereign) has the state been entitled and/or trusted to ‘police themselves’ in matters of crimes of the state against its’ citizens? That was the underlying rationale of the Bill of Rights, precisely because the state cannot ever be trusted to do that.
This RANK FAIL (order) omits to do two critical things; use of the courts contempt powers to sanction the FBI (send a message, up to and inclusive of jailing the corrupt actors) and more importantly, search for, identify and provide avenue to remedy for plausible past abuses. This 2nd instance could easily (however imperfectly) be addressed, it would be as simple as the FISA Court appointing and empowering an independent special master (people’s advocate) with exculpatory evidence subpoena power to begin a review of past, present and future applications. Now, why doesn’t the court dare go there? Secrecy?
Here’s where it gets sticky for the secret court; in a case of ‘what you don’t know, won’t hurt you’ (and especially what you don’t know shouldn’t hurt the FISA court.) Firstly, if your rights have been violated, you won’t even be allowed to know it. Because if you WERE allowed to know this, it opens the door to all sorts of complications for the national security state, not only what the state has been up to in secret, where it is poking its’ nose, but certainly not least, a scrutiny of the FISA Court as a rubber stamp ‘star chamber’ in the absolute absence of any independent advocate mechanism to secure the rights of those Americans unfairly, wrongly, even maliciously, targeted by FISA secret spying warrants.
It follows, even if you have solid grounds (e.g. yours truly does) to believe corrupt FBI/FISA abuse happened to you, you won’t have a remedy because the established ‘state secrets’ doctrine demands you have no access to the documents necessary to substantiate your claim. The constitutional absurdity of this is, you cannot independently prove the government illegally-unjustly-corruptly spied on you (establish standing to sue), so you have no access to the proof they did, even when they did so egregiously, as was the one-off (became known) case of Carter Page.
What broke the Carter Page case into the open is politics, pure and simple, the fallout causing the FISA Court to issue the ‘cover your ass’ “Order Misc. 19-02” or a ‘police yourselves’ pretense of accountability.
Postscript: 22 December there is reportedly another (not yet released) order holding exactly ONE individual to account (referred to prosecution) for FISA abuse in the case of multiple deceits by several individuals exposed in the case of Carter Page (scapegoat settled upon!)
The above link delves into impunity at the international level. Insofar as the USA’s exercise of impunity, of considerable recent importance, in my estimation, it is the deep state’s Robert Mueller role-as-mole or ‘special counsel’ in ‘the Russians did it’ charade should draw the necessary attention to underline the intelligence agencies anti-Constitutional order embedded in the USA’s security structures.
Of the exposures (in the public domain) of this man as a fraud devoted to what amounts to an anti-constitutional order that has stepped itself up and above the rule of law, there are three that stand out to a degree disqualifying Robert Mueller as anything excepting corrupt;
1) in his role as deputy attorney general during the Bush 41 administration, Robert Mueller, when directly accountable William Barr in Barr’s first term as Attorney General for President George H.W. Bush, Mueller headed up the USA end of the Lockerbie investigation that was later exposed by a Chief of Scots police as a frame-up of Libya due to false evidence and testimony provided by the USA;
2) it was Robert Mueller, again under the direct supervision of GHW Bush’s Attorney General William Barr, had been exposed by a United States Senate investigation (that was never acted on) showing Mueller sandbagged the criminal case against Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) and subsequently;
3) it was Robert Mueller’s FBI for over a decade refused to arrest a serial killer, Enrique Prado, despite more than ample evidence (a proverbial ‘mountain’ of evidence) provided to the Department of Justice by both state and federal law enforcement.
The common thread in these events? It is the Central Intelligence Agency. The USA end of the Lockerbie investigation was tied to false physical evidence planted by the CIA and the FBI provided the ‘expert’ testimony of Thomas Thurman (later exposed as a fraud) under then Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller’s supervision, subverting the BCCI case was all about the CIA’s Iran-Contra international arms and narcotics money laundering Mueller worked to limit exposure to (damage control) and Enrique Prado is not only a serial killer, documented by multiple law enforcement officials as responsible for multiple drug cartel related murders that Mueller’s FBI failed to act on, but also happens to double as a high ranking CIA official who moved on to Blackwater where the CIA’s contract killings became outsourced (Prado remains free & has never been prosecuted.)
Of the many instance of Robert Mueller’s dirty work for CIA, these three cases are remarkable for the fact they are reasonably indisputable. [1], [2], [3], [4]
Whatever the preceding indicates per ‘the Russians did it’ hysteria certainly does not include good faith compliance with the rule of law when all indicators point to the USA’s top law enforcement officials should be convicted felons in their own right.
Glenn Greenwald at The Intercept calls out the New York Times journalists exposing ‘fake news’ by pointing out they’re plagiarizing Russian media on what actually happened with the torched ‘humanitarian aid’ at the Venezuela-Colombia border. Huh? Yeah, it’s a head-scratch worthy of a political chimp, because Greenwald DOES NOT explore the most important question: who benefits from the NYT story in media that (Greenwald acknowledges) might as well be outright owned by the (deep) state. The real story here? White House occupying Kissinger-philosophy-neocon-Christian-Zionist-Pentagon centered ‘national security’ clique 0 – 1 wannabe White House occupying Brzezinski-philosophy-neoliberal-globalist-CIA centered ‘national security’ clique (noting there is some overlay between cliques from their respective bases of power.)
Russian media prints what you won’t see in your everyday liberal democracies’ newspaper; British intelligence had proposed a plan to massacre Catholic schoolchildren in Northern Ireland but this was a reach too far, even for the Ulster Protestant extremists:
These stories typically come out when it is far past time to bring the perpetrators to justice (dead or fear dying with guilty conscience) but this next one points to the British-USA skullduggery going on in the here and now:
Per the preceding story, I don’t expect for one minute Trump is clean (and it does not bode well a blackmail susceptible reality TV freak is POTUS) but he’s a petty criminal character by comparison to what’s covered up at the United States Department of Justice.
Going to this next, in the absence of accountability for billionaires playing with technological fire and tampering with reality in ways risking us all, I’d support a constitutional amendment allowing a bill of attainder authorizing the forever jailing of Elon Musk:
A former Special Forces Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald is published in International Law as a layman (The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole) and has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Spain and the Catalonia independence movement; renown French journalist Jean Quatremer points to resurgent Francoism in Spain, compares Spanish Prime Minister Rajoy to Turkey’s President Erdogan:
Trump administration argues it can withhold, at will, any and practically all documentation on how the USA’s Food and Drug Administration decided to approve genetically modified salmon:
Per the immediate preceding, my own observation would be, even if the Special Counsel allegations were to be credible, the people bringing them destroy all credibility; when your lead investigator/special prosecutor’s history is framing people for crimes they didn’t commit, sandbagging & sinking criminal investigations into international narcotics & arms trafficking, protecting related money laundering & hired killers, and providing cover for the perpetrators (intelligence agencies) … why would any reasonably honest & intelligent person give two cents credibility to, and possess a rat’s ass level of sympathy for, ‘special’ counsel Robert Mueller? Why be concerned with anything other than the likely fact the entire process is a case of fatally poisoned ‘justice.’
Related legacy articles at ronaldthomaswest.com:
Personal experiences and political observations, having lived in Catalonia:
The Alter-Ego Boys
(or, perhaps they’re just alter-boys)
So, who is the greater criminal, Robert Manson or Charlie Mueller? Er, I meant, Charlie Manson or Robert Mueller? We’ll begin with Robert Mueller. Be patient, we’ll get to ‘Charlie’ Mueller’s more recent angels, James Comey and Christopher Wray. But first…
^ Click on photo for the ‘official’ story
Mueller’s stellar criminal career and his earlier angel, FBI ‘expert witness’ Thomas Thurman [1], points to Mueller’s criminal complicity in geopolitical murders [2]. Mueller had oversight role of the USA end of the Lockerbie investigation as a Department of Justice attorney, concerning the mass murder of hundreds of people with the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 [3] at Lockerbie, Scotland. We can neatly sum this case up with the statement [4] of a senior investigative official in Scotland’s police:
[4] “The retired officer – of assistant chief constable rank or higher – has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people
“The officer, who was a member of the Association of Chief Police Officers Scotland, is supporting earlier claims by a former CIA agent that his bosses “wrote the script” to incriminate Libya
“The fragment was later identified by the FBI’s Thomas Thurman as being part of a sophisticated timer device used to detonate explosives, and manufactured by the Swiss firm Mebo, which supplied it only to Libya and the East German Stasi
“Thurman was later unmasked as a fraud who had given false evidence in American murder trials, and it emerged that he had little in the way of scientific qualifications”
Charlie’s ‘angel’ Thomas Thurman was the FBI’s go to ‘evidence’ man and ‘expert’ witness whenever our CIA’s and/or deep state’s rulers wanted someone framed up for something they’d actually not done. When Thurman was unmasked as a fraud responsible for false convictions, instead of facing prosecution, he was ‘retired’ (kept his pension) and found employ as a professor, and Mueller was never so much as questioned about how Thurman might have compromised the Lockerbie case.
Recalling the CIA role in the preceding case handled by Mueller, it should come as no surprise Mueller would be, again as a DoJ attorney, the agency’s damage control man when he was the saboteur [5] assigned to sinking the biggest money laundering criminal case in USA history; the primary Iran-Contra facilitating bank [6] BCCI:
[5] “Kerry will later conclude that the Justice Department in particular went to great lengths to block his and Morgenthau’s investigations “through a variety of mechanisms, ranging from not making witnesses available, to not returning phone calls, to claiming that every aspect of the case was under investigation in a period when little, if anything was being done.” After the Bank of England shuts down BCCI in July 1991 (see July 5, 1991), making big headlines, Under Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller takes over Justice Department efforts on BCCI and assigns many new attorneys to the case. But Kerry will ultimately conclude that the indictments the Justice Department brings forth against BCCI after that time were narrower and less detailed than those of Morgenthau’s, and often seemed to be in response to what Morgenthau was doing”
[6] “BCCI was the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, a dirty offshore bank that then-President Ronald Reagan’s Central Intelligence Agency used to run guns to Hussein, finance Osama bin Laden, move money in the illegal Iran-Contra operation and carry out other “agency” black ops. The Bushes also benefited privately; one of the bank’s largest Saudi investors helped bail out George W. Bush’s troubled oil investments”
So, Mueller doesn’t just have an ugly mug, he is just plain ugly. That becomes particularly clear when he moves from DoJ criminal division chief to head up the FBI, where he is most notable for NOT investigating the crimes sprees of the Bush Jr administration. Now, this is when it get sticky for his erstwhile DoJ buddy James Comey:
[7] “In 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger, which left out former Clinton administration officials who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives. The documents were relevant to accusations that the Clinton administration was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack
“Many will also be unaware that before Comey was installed by the Obama Administration as FBI Director, he was on the board of Director at HSBC Bank – a bank implicated in international money laundering, including the laundering of billions on behalf of international drugs and narcotics trafficking cartels.
“Forbes also points out where Comey was also at the key choke-point during the case involving dodgy auditor KPMG which followed on by the HSBC criminal case:
“If Comey, and his boss Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, had made a different decision about KPMG back in 2005, KPMG would not have been around to miss all the illegal acts HSBC and Standard Chartered SCBFF were committing on its watch. Bloomberg reported in 2007 that back in June of 2005, Comey was the man thrust into the position of deciding whether KPMG would live or die for its criminal tax shelter violations.”
Huh. Except for not having Charlie Mueller’s physical ugliness, recent Charlie’s angel, excuse me, recent FBI Director Comey’s style had been a good match for the criminal ugliness of his mentor. Both are expert at sandbagging and sinking investigations into mega-bucks criminal enterprises.
Well, that was short and not so sweet, bringing us to the same DoJ cesspool, excuse me, criminal talent pool, and its producing present FBI Director Christopher Wray. Now, suppose you’re the 3rd Bush aligned senior DoJ criminal division staff that will move on to head up the FBI, and some poor sap has opened up the super-sized menu of maggots called the Novation investigation concerning multiple billions in Medicare fraud [8]. The problem here is, the Novation case implicates Bush Jr Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, a former member of a law firm representing Novation, and future presidential wannabe & presidential brother Jeb Bush. So, future FBI Director Wray’s subordinates, DoJ criminal division Novation case team members, Thelma Colbert & Shannon Ross, are ‘dropped dead’ (remember ‘poppa’ Bush is former career CIA), the rest of the investigating team is reassigned, resigned or fired and that’s that.
[8] “USA [United States Attorney] Thelma Louise Quince Colbert, the head of FCA Act investigations in the Ft. Worth Office of the US Attorney for the Northern District of Texas who had initiated the False Claims Act prosecution of Cynthia Fitzgerald’s charges against Novation LLC was found dead in her swimming pool by her daughter on July 20, 2004.
“The Criminal Chief of the Dallas U.S. Attorney’s office Shannon K. Ross who signed the subpoenas against Novation LLC, General Electric, and Cardinal Health in the government case against the hospital supply cartel was found dead September 11, 2004.
“Based on the federal codes cited in a copy of one of the subpoenas, the investigators were seeking evidence of health care fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States, theft or bribery involving programs receiving federal funds, obstruction of investigations and other possible violations”
The preceding quote is from a letter by a private attorney who was stepped on by the deep state; the letter is addressed to past FBI Director Mueller’s buddy & recent FBI Director Comey, asking him to investigate the inside fix covering up crimes including the murders of two of then DoJ criminal division chief and present FBI Director Wray’s subordinates. ‘Hope springs eternal’ is the apropos expression. It’s kind of like asking Tex Watson to investigate Susan Atkins, Linda Kasabian, and Patricia Krenwinkel. In other words, it’s like asking the Manson family to investigate themselves, only worse.
^ Click on image to get ‘official’ story
So, who is the bigger criminal, Charlie Manson or Robert Mueller? In a way, they’re indistinguishable. In another way, Mueller is the greater criminal, by far. They are indistinguishable in that both are killers whose accountability is by implication; both are often (Manson) or altogether (Mueller) physically removed from the crimes they must be held accountable for. The similarity ends there. Manson is the minor criminal when compared to Mueller. Manson is tied to the deaths of maybe a dozen people with perhaps as many additional murders yet to be discovered. Mueller is tied to the murders of hundreds.
Then, Mueller, Comey and Wray, the lot of them, are responsible for covering up the murders of a cartel hit-man. How is that not equal to or exceeding the crimes of Manson?
[9] “In “How to Get Away with Murder in America,” the celebrated journalist Evan Wright reveals the extraordinary story of Enrique “Ricky” Prado, an alleged killer for a major Miami drug trafficker who was recruited into the CIA. Despite a grand jury subpoena and a mountain of evidence unearthed by a federal task force, Prado was promoted into the agency’s highest echelons and charged with implementing some of the country’s most sensitive post-9/11 counterterrorist operations, including the agency’s secret “targeted assassination unit.” All while staying in close touch with his cocaine-trafficking boss and, evidence suggests, taking part in additional killings for him”
“A mountain of evidence unearthed by a federal task force”, yet no criminal indictments produced over the tenure of three senior DoJ criminal division staff moved on to become FBI Directors and Prado is still killing today. This is result of a deep state insurance policy. The insurer issuing the policy could be called the Grassley/Feinstein Mutual Fund [10] [11], a subsidiary [12] of Prescott Bush & Alan Dulles Partners Limited.
Of course, none of this will be brought out by the Congressional intelligence committees, to collapse the credibility of ‘three amigos’ Special Counsel Mueller, fired Director Comey & present FBI boss Wray to help kill the ‘Russia collusion’ farce; because all parties are complicit and tainted in the cover-up. Grassley wants the DoJ personalities to fall on their swords while Feinstein is besides herself, going crazy, as the investigation into President Skunk implodes around the Steele Dossier. It’s like an exclusive ‘serial-killers only’ swingers’ club where everybody is tired of the limited opportunity at couplings, yet their sex addiction requires everyone screwing everyone out of habit and everyone hates everyone’s guts. At some point, the entire crew will resort to some new mass murder, like initiating war with Iran, to get it all back on track.
Welcome to DC.
*
Note: The Bush family has a status as gods within the operational sector (dirty tricks division) of the CIA. They’re also ‘Never Trump’ Republicans. My hypothesis is, the entire ‘the Russians did it’ hysteria in DC is a related CIA exercise aimed at Trump. The agency is expert at ‘backstopping’ it’s clandestine operations and the DoJ had been set up as patsies in case the operation began falling apart. It probably went down something like this; the agency set up and fed allegations into a feedback loop between Christopher Steele and the Department of Justice/FBI and then stepped out of the loop. This likely was initiated within the DNC Hillary faction who were misinformed as to the actual culprit in the so-called DNC ‘hack’ [13]. These people took the bait and ran with it, right into the arms of a CIA liaised Fusion GPS sub-contracted British spook Christopher Steele who in turn fed the Clintonistas at DoJ what they wanted to hear and they lapped it up like shit-eating dogs. But it didn’t unseat Trump because the generals saw their chance to consolidate power of the Pentagon, over a more or less neo-liberal CIA, at the White House and they didn’t buy in. Consequently, it could go something like this: When our Christian Taliban generals are satisfied with their grip on power [14], in the case of Trump initiating a conflict in Iran and the generals become indispensable (but only following an inept commander-in-chief’s orders), look for the generals to step out of the way and open the door to Trump’s removal for starting the war they ‘didn’t really want.’ Meanwhile Trump is a perfect idiot to front up and take the heat for anything/everything that might possibly go wrong as he hands what’s left of the USA over to the military-industrial corporate boards.
A former Special Forces Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald is published in International Law as a layman (The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole) and has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
The Washington DC End of the DNC Mails Story
or How Lies Meant to ‘backstop’ Lies Invites Fall-guys
“Crowdstrike, a firm that analyzes threats to network security, revealed that the DNC had called it in to inspect the party’s servers, where it found “two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network.” Crowdstrike released a comprehensive report of its findings on June 14, which accompanied a Washington Post article detailing the attacks. One of the hacking groups, Crowdstrike found, had access to the DNC servers for almost a year”
Now, recalling the preceding, look at this next, a case of ‘he said, she said’
“According to the [DNC] group, the FBI never asked to see their servers. But FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee back in January that the FBI did”
In any case, the FBI was more than willing (to the time things became ‘sticky’ and routine face-saving lies to Congress becomes necessary) to rely on ‘Crowdstrike’ instead of conducting their own analysis. But Crowdstrike is a true ‘Tar-Baby’ of Uncle Remus fame…
…pointing back to Clintonistas at the Obama era John Brennan’s CIA via Google’s 100 million investment in Crowdstrike. Google has been an agency project from its inception:
“It is not precisely clear when the company caught the attention of America’s intelligence agencies, but high-level whistleblowers suggest it was early on in the company’s history. In a 2006 interview, ex-CIA agent Robert David Steele suggested that it was from the very outset.
“I think Google took money from the CIA when it was poor and it was starting up,” Steele said in the interview. “They’ve been together for quite a while”
“Steele also fingered the company’s point man in the CIA: Dr. Rick Steinheiser in the Office of Research and Development”
This earlier reporting, by Corbett Report, is reinforced with subsequent investigative reporting by Insurge Intelligence:
“Thuraisingham’s account … demonstrates that the CIA-NSA-MDDS program was not only partly funding Brin throughout his work with Larry Page developing Google, but that senior US intelligence representatives including a CIA official [Dr Rick Steinhieser] oversaw the evolution of Google in this pre-launch phase, all the way until the company was ready to be officially founded. Google, then, had been enabled with a “significant” amount of seed-funding and oversight from the Pentagon: namely, the CIA, NSA, and DARPA” [sic]
In the case of following CIA linked investments, Google doesn’t invest 100 million in anything that will not become agency invested-responsive. That’s Crowdstrike. But there’s more.
Next, we come to the problem with the so-called (British MI6 veteran spook Christopher Steele produced, not to be confused with former CIA officer Robert Steele) ‘Steele Dossier’ and the idea it isn’t so much what it does contain or does not contain, inasmuch as what it actually accomplishes, versus what it had been intended to accomplish.
It was in this phase, Guccifer 2.0 had dropped the now thoroughly debunked bomb…
“Big League Politics asked Carter about the identity of the original author of the Guccifer documents.
“For one thing, we know Flood was not the original author of the docs,” Carter told BLP. “So, it’s definitely odd to see that he’s shown as author of any of them initially.”
“Carter elaborated that “Flood (or someone using a computer that had MS-Word set up by Flood using his own details in the past) actually started out by creating a blank file with a Russian stylesheet entry in it.”
“This was then saved as 1.doc, 2.doc and 3.doc,” he said. “Then 30 minutes later, on another computer, with MS-Word registered to the Russian name (the Soviet secret police founder that has been dead for almost a century). Each of those files was opened, had content copied into it (assumably from the original documents) and was then saved (writing the Russian name into the metadata at that time)”
…at WordPress it was he responsible for hacking the DNC and his documents subsequently identified as Russia originated, a story immediately picked up and run with by reliable Central Intelligence Agency cover story laundering outlets Washington Post (here) and New York Times (here.) But Russian intelligence would never be so stupid and we know now the Guccifer documents had initially been copied into a computer registered to Warren Flood, a sometimes DNC operative and former computer tech for Joe Biden. Thank Crowdstrike for that, a choice made to throw the bloodhounds off, credit should always be given where credit is due. And then…
…the duped Clintonistas at the DNC immediately ran with this disinformation to the CIA connected Fusion GPS (the DoJ-CIA inter-agency/incest/compromised connections are there) which in turn handed it off (sub-contracted it) to Britain based Orbis Business Intelligence and ex-MI6 spook Christopher Steele who created (out of thin air) ‘evidence’ the Russians had colluded with Trump. This ‘evidence’ was, in turn, fed (by Steele) to the Clintonistas at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, entrapping the Department of Justice’s FBI (a case of poetic justice concerning the masters of entrapment) who were more than happy to take a ‘reputable’ spook’s report at face value. What the Clintonistas at the DoJ and FBI, in their ecstatic state at the ‘dossier’ content, failed to recall is, spooks are trained and paid perjurors, in the first degree:
“Professional standards require intelligence professionals to lie, hide information, or use covert tactics to protect their “cover,” access, sources, and responsibilities. The Central Intelligence Agency expects, teaches, encourages, and controls these tactics so that the lies are consistent and supported (“backstopped”). The CIA expects intelligence officers to teach others to lie, deceive, steal, launder money, and perform a variety of other activities that would certainly be illegal if practiced in the United States. They call these tactics “tradecraft,” and intelligence officers practice them in all the world’s intelligence services” -Hulnick & Mattausch, “Ethics and Morality in U.S. Secret Intelligence”
This small fact is an imperative part of spook job description. More than ‘coincidental’ to this, by the time John Brennan had met with James Comey at the end of 2016, and Comey came away ‘agreeing’ with the ‘intelligence’ promoted by the CIA … it was too late for the DoJ’s FBI to back out of what by then they had begun to realize was a bogus dossier, a ‘novel’ if you will. But now that it’s too late, with the FBI badly trapped in the CIA’s lies or ‘bought in’ to running with the story whether they like it or not; if/when the entire operation comes unglued, it is the Department of Justice will become the patsy (and deservedly so.)
Did the CIA deliberately entrap the FBI? At some point, certainly yes, knowing they would need their ‘Russians hacked the election’ information operation (PSYOP) ‘backstopped’ (spook lingo for a credible witness to back up the lie.) The DNC’s Crowdstrike hire is where the CIA’s operation had to have been initiated, Guccifer is certainly their asset, and it was the Orbis MI6 veteran spook, Christopher Steele, was tasked with entrapping the FBI, the real reason behind his having independently-incrementally fed the false ‘dossier’ information to the Clintonistas at FBI and DoJ (who lapped it up like shit-eating dogs.)
Clearly Google invested Crowdstrike profiles (strongly) as the CIA asset which had been tasked with manufacturing evidence, for the cover story Central Intelligence would create to exploit the DNC data loss, and the FBI was encouraged to rely on the Crowdstrike exam of the DNC servers to keep that agency from having investigators develop and be in possession of information at odds with the CIA’s story line.
This all having been clumsily engineered and destined to unravel comes as no surprise at all, the Central Intelligence Agency senior management of the present day is beyond stupid:
Meanwhile, over at WikiLeaks, Julian Assange completely blew his so-called ‘whistle-blowing’ organization’s opportunity to set the record straight … and those of you who’d read Incompetent Espionage & WikiLeaks (III) know the rest of the story, republished here:
“Under this deal, which was reported by the Wall Street Journal, Assange would provide conclusive proof that Russia was not the source of hacked emails WikiLeaks published. In return, he would be offered a pardon, or some other assurance that he wouldn’t be prosecuted by the US for involvement in WikiLeaks.
“Rohrabacher brought this deal to the White House Wednesday [13 September 2017], but Chief of Staff John Kelly not only apparently didn’t like the offer, but didn’t tell President Trump that the offer had been made, instead telling Rohrabacher to take the proposal to the intelligence community.
“The intelligence community almost certainly wouldn’t be in a position to offer any sort of amnesty for Assange, which likely means the end of the proposal. Rohrabacher offered to set up a meeting between Assange and a Trump representative, but that too appears to have been dismissed by Kelly”
So, the generals keep Trump sequestered like the Vatican keeps a rampant pedophile priest under wraps; away from any real work and responsibilities (in this case, kept from knowledge of what’s actually going on in the world.) But now, with the Wall Street Journal blowing the whistle, Ivanka should soon be whispering in her daddy’s ear; and what will tell you everything is, what happens next. Suppose Trump keeps his mouth shut and says nothing? This will indicate the absolute completion of the Pence aligned generals capture of the Oval Office.
But the real news here is, Assange provides evidence of his belief that he is personally more important than any unconditional release of information which should stop the Pentagon and NATO’s pursuit of a war footing directed at Russia in its tracks.
Narcissism? Is there a stronger word? Julian Assange, who fancies himself ‘Jesus of the Digital Age’ would appear to be tired of bearing his cross. The Roman’s puppet, King Herod, hasn’t been authorized to provide the pardon and Pontius Pilate’s (read Mike Pompeo’s) people will deliver Jesus of the Digital Age to crucifixtion on behalf of the ‘duopoly’ mob, to satisfy their blood lust. Good luck with the world’s biggest ‘deal-maker’ (read loser) Wikileaks, because you blew it by waiting too long.
The entire sand-castle (a product of Obama CIA Director John Brennan’s imagination) the “Russians hacked the election” is finally washing away with an incoming tide. How this plays out is anyone’s guess.
The open question is, how the new information will be leveraged, if it were to actually break into the open widely, with the bad boy Trump essentially captured by the surreal evil that surrounds him. Other than pure evil (e.g. Pence), only a narcissist or a fool would ever desire to be president of this particular republic. In ‘The Donald’, we have both.
1 August 2017 an audio tape is leaked in which Seymour Hersh states the FBI knows it was Seth Rich leaked the DNC mails:
“What the [FBI] report says is that some time in late Spring… he makes contact with WikiLeaks, that’s in his computer. Anyway, they found what he had done is that he had submitted a series of documents — of emails, of juicy emails, from the DNC” -Seymour Hersh
On 9 August 2017 The Nation magazine publishes a column on a group of independent experts…
“Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year”
…demonstrating the DNC mails were leaked, not hacked.
On 18 August 2017 Antiwar.com reports Congressman Dana Rohrabacher has met with Assange concerning the DNC mails and [the article] further credibly suggests Assange is holding the DNC leak evidence hostage as a bargaining chip to possibly acquire a pardon for himself and leverage wikileaks into legitimacy with a President of the United States who at this point is owned by the USA’s intelligence agencies, a hare-brained scheme destined to fail. Assange & company waited too long.
But this would fit Julian Assange’s self-centered, persecuted-savior complex which never ceases to amaze, this guy (as well, Craig Murray) has allowed the idiots surrounding Trump to push us towards the brink with Russia, for months. All because Assange is tired of his embassy confinement in London, a circumstance that is entirely his own fault for the fact he didn’t have the self-discipline to keep his dick in his pants (whether Assange’s admitted intercourse was a case of rape or not.)
What’s more is, this blog pointed to strong circumstantial evidence it was Seth Rich leaked the DNC mails this past January, and recalling this, it still stretches the imagination a former UK ambassador would make an amateur espionage move worthy of a cub scout playing spy. But that’s what Craig Murray had done in the case of the DNC emails leaked to WikiLeaks.
Seymour Hersh states Seth Rich is the source of the DNC mails. Craig Murray states he had met with the source of the DNC mails. A + B = C:
Craig Murray met with Seth Rich
That Murray would be a high value target for American counter-intelligence to monitor for the reason of his high profile association with WikiLeaks is beyond obvious. For Murray then to state…
“I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things”
…goes to the practically bizarre when coming from a former United Kingdom ambassador to Uzbekistan. The UK is little different to the USA in the case of embassies providing cover for spies; in which case Murray should at least have some rudimentary espionage understanding such as YOU DO NOT MEET YOUR SOURCE DIRECTLY WHEN YOU ARE A HIGH PROFILE TARGET OF YOUR ADVERSARY’S COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE HUNTING YOUR (in this case, WikiLeaks) SOURCE(S)
Then, we had WikiLeak’s Assange giving what amounts to a ‘Glomar’ ‘I will neither confirm or deny’ response concerning the murder (assassination) of Seth Rich after appearing to suggest Rich was the source of the DNC emails leak:
Beyond this, WikiLeaks offering a $20,000 reward for the solving of the Seth Rich murder is laughable, that’s what an American west coast upscale community would offer for the arrest of a serial killer of the neighborhood’s cats. Two million dollars might get two seconds’ attention of a corruptible counter-intelligence agent with knowledge of a professional hit on Seth Rich, twenty million might even net an inside the agency sucker willing to take the exceedingly high risk to one’s life (almost certain death) that would attend selling out an agency hit man for substantial lucre. In truth, the WikiLeaks reward offer amounted to little more than a tabloid publicity stunt.
Narcissism is a blinding thing; and a self-righteous narcissism is no exception. Ambassador Murray could have every good intention but on the face of it, he had seriously screwed up. Murray and WikiLeaks should have immediately come clean, there was little to lose. Seth Rich was the source, Murray had met with him, and much could have been gained by stating so; there would be nothing given up any intelligence agency involved did not already know. It have been the right thing to do.
Craig Murray stating ‘I had a serious lapse of professional judgement and this resulted in the death of Seth Rich’ would be the most responsible and newsworthy move WikiLeaks could have taken; to counter the CIA’s ‘the Russians hacked the DNC’ propaganda lie, in which there is much invested by the agency; and the consequent damage to relations with Russia, and growing threat to what little world peace yet exists, is immense. WikiLeaks should have done the right thing a long time ago and they have not. Why not? Because Assange and WikiLeaks believes Assange’s comfort is more important than world peace. What fucks. This is beyond inexcusable, it’s criminal. But for Murray, there’s more at stake here than just a hit to ego & image.
Murray’s likely role in the DNC leaks case? A personal meeting with Rich to confirm for WikiLeaks Seth Rich was a bona fide insider with authentic material prior to a WikiLeaks cash payment to Rich and arrangements completed for the mails transfer.
Now, it is a question of ‘damned if you do and damned if you don’t’ release the evidence because WikiLeaks waited too long, and let the criminals surrounding Trump consolidate their power while investing deeply in the myth of the Russians hacked the election; a criminal cabal that will up the ante on the world stage to any level necessary to avoid accountability. WikiLeaks Idiots. WikiLeaks Morons.
Meanwhile, Murray subsequently barred from the United States (except that he applies for a visa, typically unnecessary for a British citizen) appears to have been, in a manner of speaking, a deep state message to Murray: ‘thank you very much for the lapse of judgement, we have taken full advantage with the assassination of Seth Rich and we won’t be requiring your services after this’ (he’d be smart to stay away.)
The really sticky problem for WikiLeaks in this scenario is, Seymour Hersh asserts in the recorded call WikiLeaks had paid Rich for the leaked documents, damaging or reducing to element of pretense WikiLeaks claims of journalism & providing rationale for deep state prosecutors & judges to find this had been straightforward espionage. But they won’t do it if the Rich-Murray meeting stays buried, a LOT is invested in ‘the Russians did it’ for the public consumption. If it DOES break open, Murray’s ‘goose is cooked.’ It’s now not only WikiLeaks problem in a larger sense, but Murray’s, whether he does or doesn’t admit the assassinated Seth Rich had been the DNC mails source.
Associated Press puts out John Kerry’s patently false speculation parroted by the fixed Dutch MH 17 investigation’s findings:
“International investigators have concluded that the Buk missile was fired from Russia-backed rebel-controlled territory by a mobile launcher trucked in from Russia and hastily returned”
In this context it does to remind concerning the USA ‘assistance’ of the Lockerbie bombing case:
“A FORMER Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated
“The retired officer – of assistant chief constable rank or higher – has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people”
It was an FBI ‘expert witness’ testified to this ‘evidence’ authenticity in Lockerbie and another bombed flight at odds with the actual facts:
”It is striking to note the similarity of the ‘scientific’ evidence discovered by the FBI’s Tom Thurman in both the Lockerbie and UTA cases. Of the tens of thousands of pieces of debris collected at each disaster site, one lone piece of printed circuit was found and, miracle of miracles, in each case the fragment bore markings that allowed for positive identification: MEBO in the Lockerbie case and TY in the case of UTA Flight 772. Despite the common findings of the DCPJ, the DST and the Prefecture of Police crime laboratory, Juge Bruguière chose to believe Thurman, the expert in fabricating evidence”
Speaking of egregious political lies, we have a former policeman says it WAS INDEED a US Navy missile brought down TWA flight 800…
“Unlike Pierre Salinger, who relies on the internet rumors and old FAA tapes, ex-cop turned investigative reporter Jim Sanders uses original first hand scientific evidence and actual U.S. Government documents and inside sources”
…recalling the USA attempted cover-up in its Navy’s shoot-down of an Iranian civilian passenger jet:
And the other incompetent military which previously blew a Russian civilian airliner out of the sky with a surface to air missile? Would you expect Ukraine? US Navy 2 civilian airliners downed to Ukraine military’s 1 (or 2, depending on the actual facts of MH 17)
And the bombing of the flight to Venezuela from Cuba? A known CIA asset was the perpetrator:
“In 2015, the US State Department declassified a document which the Miami Herald reported indicated that Luis Posada Carriles was the most likely planner of the 1976 suitcase bombing of Cubana de Aviación Flight 455 that killed 73 people”
When it comes to demonizing the USA’s boogeymen of choice, these days the boogieman is Russia, no propaganda ploy is too low; even so far as to deliberately perpetrate mass murder framing an innocent party –
Comey states he was so stunned by Trump’s request to drop the Flynn investigation he didn’t reply but “just took it in.”
So, Trump will be impeached in a ‘he said, she said’ liars contest (Comey being ‘she’) and what will never be touched is the fact Comey’s FBI had covered up GLADIO B funding international terrorism with narcotics and arms trafficking…
…nor will the FBI investigate the real reason David Petraeus was forced out at the CIA only days prior to this documentary’s release:
So, why aren’t Trump’s people counter-attacking with the real stuff? What’s he got to lose? Oh, that’s right, the next Lee Harvey Oswald (courtesy of CIA or MOSSAD, readers choice) is just waiting to manifest. Or perhaps more likely, Trump is frightened of the FBI opening the old Roy Cohn ‘closet’ revealing shadows of mob ties getting Trump empire business done.
But that’s tame shit compared to what Trump could open the FBI leadership up to if he had real courage. So, the eunuch Donald Trump, who has the money and investigators to collapse the special prosecutor Robert Mueller who’d preceded Comey at the FBI in covering up international arms and narcotics trafficking funded Gladio B false-flag terrorism & a war crimes program whose hands on leadership reported directly to David Petraeus, not to mention shoot down the traitor Mike Pence & the several Pence aligned generals, because it is the Pentagon at the nexus of the entire sordid business, won’t do it because without his civilian life and lawyers, ‘The Donald’ has no balls.
Then, Trump appoints a Department of Justice ‘insider’, Christopher ‘fae’ Wray, to replace Comey at FBI. Nothing like nominating the Bush era DoJ criminal investigations chief who was on the job when two of his subordinates, Thelma Colbert & Shannon Ross, were ‘dropped dead’ while investigating the Jeb Bush role in the (shut down by Bush Attorney General Alberto Gonzales whose private practice represented a party to the crime) Novation Medicare fraud case. Even if he wasn’t complicit (he had to have been because of the very nature of his position), Wray kept his mouth shut. NO CHANCE this guy will do the right thing.
Trump appointing Wray is just one more example of why this blog has a specific category for “Morons.”
Follows is a letter from a Novation case principal to Comey that Comey did not act on, nor did ‘special counsel’ looking into the Comey firing (the irony is great) Robert Mueller when he headed up the FBI, and certainly the criminal accessory Wray will not:
November 6, 2013 Director James B. Comey FBI Headquarters 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
RE: Report of Racketeering and Other Crimes Obstructing Courts in Kansas and Western Missouri
Dear Director Comey;
I am writing to report corrupt and criminal activities by state and federal government officials within the District of Kansas and the Western District of Missouri. The continuing nature of this enterprise, and the severity in which it violates the public interest of the nation, requires your immediate action.
As an attorney, I represented the Missouri corporate client Medical Supply Chain, Inc. (MSC) in a hospital supply antitrust matter from 2002-2005. The defendant cartel of dominant manufacturers, distributors, and their investment bank US Bancorp Piper Jaffray (all members and partners in the group purchasing organization Novation, LLC) had identified Internet electronic marketplaces including my client as capable of saving 20 Billion Dollars a year in what was in 2002, a 1.2 Trillion Dollar marketplace.
Today, the total of hospital supply spending by health systems nationally is well over 2 Trillion dollars and rising due to unsustainable artificial inflation of hospital supply costs. In industries that are not monopolized, many of these same items produced by the same manufactures substantially decreased in price. Government subsidies and private insurers have not been able to cover the monopoly costs with premiums their insured customers can afford.
This same scheme has destroyed the Veteran’s Administration ability to meet thedemands of returning soldiers and their war related injuries. But the technology to provide competition in hospital supplies has been kept off the market by the Novation LLC cartel.
A Novation, LLC cartel member, GE Medical and its president Jeffrey Immelt came up with a plan at the direction of General Electric’s CEO Jack Welch to obstruct Internet hospital supply marketplaces from entering the nationwide market for hospital supplies by organizing the other members of the Novation, LLC cartel in an agreement to block new entrants through per se restraints of trade including refusal to deal, market share allocation, interlocking directors, and multi year exclusive supply contracts procured with bribes paid to hospital administrators and a scheme to give rebates without reporting the savings to Medicare. The Sherman Act scheme expanded to include extortion of medical supply manufacturers, including shares in supplier corporations and kickbacks to the cartel in order to be permitted to sell supplies to the 65,000 members in hospitals and other health systems nationwide.
Unknown to me at the time I researched and filed the central antitrust complaint (attached to this letter as ATCH 1) in 2005 identifying over $80 Billion dollars lost to Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, and private healthcare insurers from the Sherman Act prohibited restrain of trade, the USDOJ Ft. Worth, Texas office had received a sealed False Claims Act complaint (ATCH 9) from a Novation, LLC executive identifying conduct to rig market process to hospitals nationwide through unlawful policies in the purchase of supplies that she had personally witnessed.
The relator, Cynthia Fitzgerald in her complaint US ex rel Cynthia I. Fitzgerald v. Novation LLC, et al, N. Dist. Of TX Case 03-01589 (ATCH 9) said that she sought money from companies that were competing for a contract for intravenous catheters, then awarded the contract to the one that gave her a check for $100,000, Becton Dickinson: “Ms. Fitzgerald said that she never told the companies they could win the contract by making a big payment — the message was implicit. She said Novation was collecting donations then to finance an internal communication system for its hospitals, but it channeled many other cash and in-kind payments to the hospitals for other purposes. In her lawsuit, she argues that the hospitals would not be able to accurately account for these payments when reporting their supply costs to the government. That meant they would claim bigger reimbursements from Medicare than they were entitled to.”
M. Williams Walsh, “Senators to Investigate Hospital Purchasing,” New York Times, Aug. 14, 2009.
In the District Court for the District of Kansas, Medical Supply Chain, Inc.’s complaints were repeatedly dismissed for alleged failures to plead elements of Sherman I and Sherman II violations and finally for failing to plead predicate acts of Hobbs Act extortion as a private cause of action under RICO. This was despite the profound simplicity of a per se Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 claim like a concerted refusal to deal (group boycott) which only requires two elements: that Novation LLC members and their associates including US Bancorp NA Piper Jaffray expressly agreed to exclude business with Internet marketplaces for hospital supplies and restrain health systems doing business with the cartel to the two Internet marketplaces which would protect the fixed supply prices and market shares of the Novation LLC cartel members Global Health.
Exchange (GHX) started by Jeffrey Immelt at Jack Welch’s direction and Neoforma,Inc. See U.S. v. Realty Multi-List, Inc., 629 F.2d 1351 at 1366-76 (C.A.5 (Ga.), 1980) The record, including the complaints found to be deficient and answer memorandums in opposition to dismissal, demonstrates that each element to state a claim under the controlling case law for each jurisdiction, along with supporting averments of facts and circumstances for each element was present in the face of the complaints and amended complaints, arranged in order to support and make plausible each element of the claim.
Each complaint alleged that US Bancorp Piper Jaffray conspired with the non-defendants Novation LLC and Novation LLC’s members including Neoforma, Inc. an Internet based electronic marketplace competing directly with MSC to supply hospitals to first breach a promise to supply MSC escrow accounts after US Bank first approving the accounts for each of the new MSC supplier representatives the company had recruited from 2000
applicants out of a concerted refusal to deal when the parent company US Bancorp NA suddenly recognized the threat to their Piper Jaffray investment syndicate’s interests in underwriting new entrants to the hospital supply market that could be extorted by the Novation LLC cartel as US Bancorp NA had done to the other Internet marketplace Neoforma, Inc. to defraud its investors out of the $900 Million dollar capitalization of Neoforma, Inc. raised by a prospectus to provide cost cutting competition to existing bricks and mortar based hospital suppliers.
The existence of a monopoly and unlawful restraint of trade was further made plausible in the complaints by citations to SEC registered press releases by CEO’s of publicly traded corporations announcing the potential success of their ventures by obtaining exclusive supply agreements with Novation LLC (ATCH 1).
I believed at first that the court was in error due to misrepresentations of the defendants intheir motions for dismissal. My client and I went repeatedly to the appellate court seekingto correct what were clear errors in facts and the applicable law including the pleading standard. This resulted in orders by KS Dist. Judge Carlos Murguia, W.D. of MO Judge Ortrie D. Smith and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges that vilified MSC, its founder Samuel K. Lipari and myself for briefing issues where the court ruled contrary to the controlling law and the expressly stated facts of the complaints, including appealing dismissed complaints that addressed subsequent conduct of the cartel members that injured MSC and restrained trade in furtherance of the ongoing criminal antitrust conspiracy.
When MSC’s supply chain expert Lynn Everard was scheduled to testify before the US Senate for the second time in the September 14, 2004 “Hospital Group Purchasing: How to Maintain Innovation and Cost Savings” hearing by the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, the defendants undertook extrajudicial efforts to prevent the racketeering enterprise from losing the Sherman Act prohibited antitrust franchise that was skimming over $80 Billion dollars annually from hospital supplies in America. US Bancorp NA CEO John (Jack) Grundhofer did not believe the bank could contain the SEC prosecution of its investment banking subsidiary Piper Jaffray for fraud and conflict of interest in its published evaluations of new company stock offerings in a documented “pay to play” scheme when US Bancorp Piper Jaffray had a member on the board of Novation LLC to control entrants to the hospital supply marketplace and concentrated on healthcare I.P.O.’s. Elizabeth Weatherman, Vice Chair National Venture Capital Association had testified before the same Senate Subcommittee in 2003 that the new entrants to the hospital supply marketplace were being deprived of venture capital due to the open restraint of trade in the hospital supply marketplace resulting from the anticompetitive conduct of the Novation LLC cartel.
Grundhofer, still fearing the Kansas District court’s exposure of the bank’s role in the criminal antitrust and Medicare fraud franchise from the MSC litigation, first attempted to have the Royal Bank of Canada purchase the US Bancorp investment bank subsidiary for approximately $600 million unsuccessfully, then jettisoned Piper Jaffray by spinning it off to US Bancorp NA shareholders at a loss.
The shareholders of Neoforma, Inc. prevailed in the preliminary rounds of a class action securities fraud case against the Internet hospital supply marketplace and its underwriting syndicate which included US Bancorp Piper Jaffray for what they alleged was a “pump and dump scheme.” Not realizing how Neoforma, Inc.’s CEO Robert J. Zollars recruited from Novation LLC cartel member Cardinal Health, Inc. after Cardinal had obtained through fraud Samuel K. Lipari’s MSC business model for a cost savings neutral Internet electronic marketplace to radically cut hospital costs through enterprise resource technology.
Neither the Neoforma, Inc. shareholders or their Milberg Weiss class action counsel that took control of the Neoforma board during the litigation were aware of Robert J. Zollars’ role as an agent of Novation LLC when the company was re-tasked to protect the Novation LLC artificially inflated hospital supply costs, despite the absence of any return from these non cost saving operations instead of competing with the cartel in a profitable business reducing hospital costs that would have realized the stock investment returns described in the Neoforma, Inc. prospectus.
General Electric (GE), was a defendant along with Jeffrey Immelt, then president of GE Medical and Jack Welch, the CEO of GE, charged with conspiring with the nondefendants the Novation LLC cartel, and the two Internet hospital supply marketplaces Neoforma, Inc., and GHX in the second and third MSC cases against the cartel, and with taking independent subsequent action against MSC to prevent MSC’s entry into the nationwide hospital supply market or to establish the functioning independent Internet hospital supply marketplace Welch had instructed Immelt to prevent.
The complaint (ATCH 1) alleged Immelt at Welch’s direction created the captive GHX with existing Novation LLC cartel members and represented the exchange as independent. MSC had obtained and filed as an exhibit to its 2003 complaint the standard contract whereby each member of Novation LLC was required to enroll in GHX and Neoforma, Inc., facilitating the direct per se antitrust prohibited conduct of allocating market share.
USA Thelma Louise Quince Colbert, the head of FCA Act investigations in the Ft. Worth Office of the US Attorney for the Northern District of Texas who had initiated the False Claims Act prosecution of Cynthia Fitzgerald’s charges against Novation LLC was found dead in her swimming pool by her daughter on July 20, 2004.
The Criminal Chief of the Dallas U.S. Attorney’s office Shannon K. Ross who signed the subpoenas against Novation LLC, General Electric, and Cardinal Health in the government case against the hospital supply cartel was found dead September 11, 2004.
Based on the federal codes cited in a copy of one of the subpoenas, the investigators were seeking evidence of health care fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States, theft or bribery involving programs receiving federal funds, obstruction of investigations and other possible violations.
Jeffrey Immelt, now CEO of GE as a result of his maintaining the monopoly artificial inflation of hospital scanning machine lease costs through the Novation LLC cartel protection of market share, feared that the MSC litigation would reveal GE had violated an antitrust consent decree obtained by the Department of Justice against GE. To prevent discovery of the crime and to exploit time gained by the suspicious deaths of Assistant US Attorneys Thelma Quince Colbert and Shannon K. Ross, Jeffrey Immelt sought to eliminate other loose ends.
Two ethics complaints were initiated against me by the State of Kansas Attorney Discipline Administrator Stanton Hazlett for my representation of the African American James L. Bolden and his witness of American Indian descent David M. Price. The complaints and the subsequent two year prosecution of myself was expressly for seeking to vindicate the federal race based statutory civil rights of Bolden under 42 USC §§ 1981 and 1982 and the right of Price’s infant son to be with his parent under the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901–1963 which prohibited the taking and placement of the child without notice to the natural father.
The unusual conduct of Kansas Attorney Discipline Administrator Stanton Hazlett of prosecuting me for advocacy protected under 42 USC §1981, §1983 from state retaliation and the conduct of the Kansas District Court judge who was hearing both the Bolden case and the 2005 MSC case links the prosecution to what it clearly was, a pretext to deprive MSC of counsel and to obstruct justice in the antitrust litigation:
“23. The Hon. Judge Kathryn H. Vratil made no rulings in Medical Supply Chain, Inc. v. Novation, et al, KS Dist. Court case no.:05-2299 delaying the opportunity to obtain discovery on the defendants’ participation in the wrongful disbarment of Medical Supply’s counsel for almost a year.
24. Kansas District Court Judge Kathryn H. Vratil then participated in an ex parte discussion on the day of the disbarment oral argument with personnel and justices of the Kansas Supreme Court, disparaging Medical Supply’s counsel without his knowledge or opportunity to question Kansas District Court Judge Kathryn H. Vratil’s testimony in conduct designed to cause Medical Supply’s counsel to be disbarred without due process.
25. Kansas District Court Judge Kathryn H. Vratil then removed herself from the case on October 20, 2005 minutes before the Kansas Supreme Court justices heard Medical Supply’s counsel’s oral argument. A transcript of the hearing which was resultantly delayed will give light to these unusual events.”
Lipari v. Novation, LLC et al Jackson County Missouri Case No. 0816-CV04217 Appendix One, pg. 3 Procedural History. See also Lipari v. General Electric, US District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Case No. 07-0849-CV-W-FJG Proposed Amended Complaint. (Doc. 27 PL. MOT. FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) at pg. 7, ¶ 10 ).
An associate of Kansas Attorney Discipline Administrator Stanton Hazlett, an attorney named Gene Schroer (that I believe investigated for Hazlett my representation of Bolden) arranged a meeting with Lipari and myself through the attorney Dennis Hawver.
I, Lipari and Dennis Hawver witnessed Gene Schroer trying to broker a surrendering of the MSC litigation to unnamed Chicago attorneys for a repayment of the $300,000.00 the corruption cost MSC while relaying the extortion Lipari would suffer from Hazlett if he did not comply. It was only Lipari’s fear of being killed in Illinois that kept him from going taking the offer:
“One such person who had a conversation with Stanton Hazlett has made it clear that Mr. Landrith will be disbarred regardless of the law or evidence in the record. While this threat imperils Medical Supply’s chance for justice in this litigation, the threat accompanied offers to “save” Medical Supply.
This involves replacing Medical Supply’s counsel with a Kansas attorney as lead counsel I feel Stanton Hazlett believes he and Magistrate O’Hara can control. I was offered the $300,000.00 US Bancorp deprived Medical Supply of to capitalize my company’s entry to market if I would agree to this arrangement. While this is being suggested to me repeatedly to the point that it is becoming a pressure, the suggested attorneys have no antitrust experience or familiarity with the present actions. 30. I believe Stanton Hazlett and Magistrate O’Hara are acting in the interests of the defendant Shughart Thomson & Kilroy to use their control over the enforcement of Kansas Attorney Ethics rules to change counsel so that evidence of Shughart Thomson & Kilroy’s actions in furtherance of the defendant’s conspiracy will not be subjected to discovery, accomplishing the conspiracy’s short term objective of concealingw hat was done to influence the Kansas District Court and the defendant conspiracy’s long term objective of eliminating liability for their conduct. Because the conspiracy so overtly seeks to control and prevent the presentation of evidence regarding the occurrences in Kansas District court and the motivations for what was done to Mr. Landrith while suppressing evidence of misconduct including felony obstruction of justice, witness intimidation and harassment related to Mr. Bolden and Mr. Price’s entirely unrelated cases.”
Affidavit of Samuel Lipari (ATCH 2), Case 2:05-cv-02299-KHV-GLR Document 30-2 Filed 07/20/2005 Filings by MSC founder Samuel K. Lipari, proceeding pro se in Jackson County, Missouri state court revealed that he sought the help of the trusted mortgage broker Donna L. Huffman who was completing law school to continue the complex antitrust litigation against the Novation LLC cartel:
“563. The petitioner sought out the real estate financial help of Donna Huffman, a mortgage broker licensed by the states of Kansas and Missouri and by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (H.U.D.) in January 2007 while considering a sale or purchase of his father’s Lee’s Summit town home to continue the stability of his father’s trucking business while his father made arrangements to undergo extensive chemotherapy in treatment of bone cancer.
564. The defendants caused Donna Huffman to be retaliated against for her association with the petitioner and his witness Bret D. Landrith.
565. Two investigators from the Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator Stanton Hazlett’s office came to the petitioner’ s attorney Dennis Hawver’s Ozawkie Kansas office around 8:30 am, Tuesday morning, November 27, 2007.
566. While there, the investigators and Dennis Hawver telephoned the petitioner’s witness Bret D. Landrith in Lee’s Summit, Missouri and revealed to Landrith that the Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator was investigating Donna Huffman for fitness to be admitted to the Kansas Bar.
567. An investigator questioned Landrith about the Western District of Missouri case Huffman v. ADP, Fidelity et al, Case No. 05-CV-01205.
568. The Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator investigators from Stanton Hazlett’s office wanted to know if Landrith had represented Donna Huffman and if he had been paid by her.
570. Landrith informed the two investigators that he had represented Donna Huffman on the Western District of Missouri case and that he never received a fee or payment for the case because he was disbarred and no longer was entitled to the property right of contingent fees for his representation but that he thought it had settled because Huffman later gave him gratuitously $2,000.00.
571. Landrith also informed the investigators that 100,000 to 300,000 members of the prospective class had been screwed out of their retirement because Donna Huffman could not find a replacement attorney after he had been disbarred.
572. Landrith reminded Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator Stanton Hazlett’s investigators that their office had disbarred him for bringing the Civil Rights claims of the African American James Bolden against the city of Topeka to federal court which Landrith had prevailed on in the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals following disbarment and for representing James Bolden’s witness against the City of Topeka theft of H.U.D. funds in an adoption appeal where David Price’s infant son had been kidnapped.
573. The F.B.I. raided the City of Topeka front company Topeka City Homes which had been set up and controlled by the city after the Kansas District court erroneously dismissed Bolden’s case and seized the records for violation of H.U.D. financial requirements.
574. As a result of Bret D. Landrith notifying the petitioner on November 27, 2007 of this meeting, the petitioner learned that his business associate Donna Huffman, an intelligent, capable woman who he trusts had been prevented from taking the July 2007 bar examination and was in danger of being found unfit by the influence of Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator Stanton Hazlett’s office over whether she is admitted in her home state and likely any other state to practice law on the false probable cause of being a plaintiff in the Western District of Missouri case Huffman v. ADP, Fidelity et al, Case No. 05-CV-01205 which was not frivolous and where the defendant Fidelity admitted to the claim impermissible fees on some of the subject Simple IRA mutual funds in a mailing to the prospective ADP class members after the complaint was filed.
575. The defendant Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP represented the wrong doers in ADP, Fidelity et al and attempted to exploit both the disbarment of Huffman’s counsel Bret D. Landrith by extrinsic fraud perpetrated by the defendant Shughart, Thompson & Kilroy PC.
576. While Huffman was unrepresented by counsel, Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP misrepresented to Huffman the current state of federal antitrust statutes to securities dealers and threatened Huffman with sanctions disparaging Landrith’s representation of the petitioner and the antitrust outcomes obtained by the defendant Shughart, Thompson & Kilroy PC solely through extrinsic fraud on the Kansas District Court.
577. In a direct response to the above averment stated in the petitioner’s action against GE, The defendants Lathrop & Gage L.C., Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP, and Shughart, Thompson & Kilroy PC through their networking with State of Kansas officials willing to disregard their oaths of office and violate federal law, caused Donna Huffman to be again denied the opportunity to take the Kansas Bar Exam.
578. Donna Huffman was prevented from representing the petitioner with the false assertion that she is mentally unfit based merely on the unconstitutional pretext that she asserted her individual legal rights pro se in protecting her child and won Director James B. Comey against the State of Kansas that was found to be abusing Huffman’s rights in Huffman v. State of Kansas Social & Rehabilitation Services, Shawnee County Kansas District Court case.
579. The Kansas SRS had failed to protect Donna Huffman’s child from documented physical abuse and continuing endangerment by Huffman’s exhusband, Chris W. Huffman a State Corridor Engineer for the Kansas Department of Transportation who’s connections to the US Department of Transportation make him an important source and facilitator of million of dollars in federal highway funds for Governor Kathleen Sebelius.”
Lipari v. Novation, LLC et al Jackson County Missouri Case No. 0816-CV04217 Initial Petition at 89-91 (ATCH 3).
Donna L. Huffman was kept from taking the bar in Kansas for three years after her graduation based on repeated extrinsic fraud committed against her by employees Kansas Attorney Discipline Administrator Stanton A. Hazlett. Hazlett’s employees also used extrinsic fraud to keep her from being admitted to take the bar in the neighboring state of Nebraska.
Samuel K. Lipari also revealed that he had sought the help of attorney David Sperry of Independence, Missouri (ATCH 3) who had both experience in complex commercial litigation and the discovery disputes Lipari anticipated would be the deciding issue in his claims. Sperry feared the defendants manipulation of the venue and suddenly died of cancer.
Shortly after being disbarred, my brief prevailed in an appeal of Judge Kathryn H. Vratil’s order dismissing Bolden’s §§1981 and 1982 claims. When Bolden was unable to obtain replacement counsel, the misconduct by state and federal court officials forced the appeals court to dismiss oral argument. See Bolden v. City of Topeka. 441 F.3d 1129 (10th Cir. 2006). The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision reinvigorated 42 USC
Sec. 1981 as a cause of action against government discrimination and real estate takings in Bolden v. City of Topeka. 441 F.3d 1129 (10th Cir. 2006).
The decision has been favorably cited by the Sixth Circuit in Coles v. Granville Case No. 05-3342 (6th Cir. May 22, 2006).
The Kansas Supreme Court later adopted my argument (for which I was expressly disbarred for making) that the Indian Child Welfare Act applied to American Indians living off the reservation in its decision on In The Matter Of A.J.S., Kansas Supreme Court Case No. 99,130 (2009) and that it deprived a state court of jurisdiction to terminate parental rights without observing the requirements under the statute. The Kansas Supreme Court has also adopted my argument (for which I was expressly disbarred for making) that misrepresentations by a natural mother to conceal the existence of a child from a father could not disqualify a father’s reasonable efforts to parent his child. In The Matter Of The Adoption Of Baby Girl P. Case No. No. 102, 287 at 13-16 (Kan., Oct. 2010). The state judgment of disbarment on its face expressly finds that I am disbarred because I made these arguments supported by the factual record of the case, yet has not reversed the taking of my constitutional property interest for my federally protected advocacy.
The prosecution of a white attorney for bringing an African American’s colorable race based civil rights claims to federal court and for good faith appellate advocacy on the Indian Child Welfare Act is unlawful, void, and criminal under 18 USC §§ 241, 242, and 245. The statutes enhance the gravamen of the crime when the deprivation of rights was for the purpose of kidnapping a child through fraud. Evidence that I was wrongfully disbarred to effect the taking of Baby C is found in Webb v. Hon. Judge Vratil et al, KDC Case # :2-09-cv-02063-FJG Memorandum for Summary Judgment ( evidence proving extrinsic fraud to procure my disbarment and the transcript of the tribunal’s prevention of testimony and evidence regarding the adoption of Baby C, then recommending disbarment based on the Baby C case).
The Novation LLC cartel had extorted large interests in Neoforma, Inc. though their agent Robert J. Zollars, the CEO of Neoforma, Inc. against the interests of the Neoforma shareholders. The unlawful practices of Novation LLC had been repeatedly exposed in a series by the New York Times, and the two entities that had formed Novation as a super group purchasing organization to corruptly circumvent the Medicare anti-kickback statute, University Health Consortium (UHC) and Volunteer Hospital Association (VHA) also had to distance themselves from the SEC criminal investigation US Bancorp Piper Jaffray by divesting themselves of Neoforma, Inc.
When the investment banking and merger syndicate of Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc., Fenwick & West LLP., Innisfree Limited, Lazard, McDermott Will & Emery LLP., Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP., Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP., and William Blair & Company (formed by Novation LLC for the purpose of solving the cartel’s exposure to the petitioner through Neoforma, Inc. ) discovered MSC’s claims in November 2005 that had not been disclosed in Securities and Exchange Commission required filings and began to fear the liability of taking Neoforma, Inc. private to obstruct justice in MSC’s antitrust civil litigation and the government False Claims Act Medicare fraud investigation that were both seeking the records of where the Novation LLC member hospitals’ laundered funds went; Jeffrey R. Immelt caused GE Capital (also a MSC defendant) to underwrite the loan giving the money to Novation LLC for merging Neoforma, Inc. with GHX, LLC the sole remaining competitor electronic marketplace for hospital supplies.
GE Capital funded the purchase of Neoforma, Inc. from VHA and UHC in March 2006. Neoforma was never profitable: “Neoforma’s balance sheet shows a cumulative loss of nearly $739 million dollars as of Sept. 30, 2004.” Healthcare Purchasing News March 2005. In 2005, in accordance with GAAP, Neoforma’s net loss and net loss per share were $35.9 million dollars and $1.81 per share respectively, an improvement from the $61.2 million dollar net loss and $3.17 net loss per share recorded in the prior year.” Neoforma, Inc. press release San Jose, CA USA 02/26/2003.
VHA and Novation’s sale of Neoforma was also required because Novation was having to support Neoforma losses with $61 million dollars a year and the defendants no longer needed the fraud of second Internet hospital supply marketplace after procuring the dismissal of MSC’s antitrust case in Judge Carlos Murguia’s District of Kansas court and the reciprocal disbarment of myself in both the District of Kansas and the Western District of Missouri without hearings.
After being disbarred, I made myself available to testify in Lipari’s pro se litigation in the State of Missouri (ATCH 3), believing that gave myself a chance to present my evidence to a jury and provide the evidentiary hearing that the State of Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator and the District of Kansas was determined I would not have. However, the cartel continued its extrinsic frauds against Lipari in state court, repeatedly removing Lipari’s cases to the Western District of Missouri District Court where the Chief Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. was on the board of directors of the Novation LLC cartel hospital chain Saint Lukes Health System, Inc. where the hospital’s own documents revealed it was a director of Novation LLC and did over 90 Million dollars a year in purchasing exclusively through long term Novation LLC contracts. The claims would then be dismissed contrary to the controlling law for each jurisdiction and the opinions would vilify Lipari for bringing the evidence of the ongoing Sherman Act 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 and RICO 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961et seq. felonies in his cases. After the disbarment I also was prevented from working even in out of state and in non law related jobs to support my four children due to reports to databases made by State of Kansas officials for having represented Bolden and Price further depriving me of my constitutional property rights for having advocated on behalf of these two minority citizens to vindicate their federal statutory rights to be free from discrimination.
This retaliation and foreseeable violation of my civil rights increased when my former client David M. Price had his 16 year old daughter taken by different state officials years later in furtherance of the growing and widespread practice in Kansas to take children through fraud and bad faith state child protective services actions violating 42 U.S.C. § 671 to further False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., prohibited taking of US Treasury funds.
Price brought an action to seek to have me reinstated in Kansas District Court to represent him and a class of similarly situated parents in a class action against the state social services. The case was styled Price v. Hon. Judge Vratil et al, Kansas District Court (“KDC”) Case # 2:09-cv-02198. Price was prosecuted for the second time a week after filing the action on a contempt charge brought by the Kansas Attorney General that had been dismissed by the Kansas Supreme Court. Then, Price and I were subpoenaed to testify in a federal criminal case USA v. Carrie Neighbors and Guy Neighbors, KS Dist. Ct. Case No. 07-20124, 08-20105, 07-20073 before Judge Carlos Murguia in the belief that I would be discredited with a perjury charge. David M. Priced served over 6 months of the jail sentence for contempt while the case was on removal to federal court even though the Tenth Circuit had exclusive jurisdiction from an appeal of the remand.
When the retaliation for my testimony in the federal criminal case USA v. Carrie Neighbors and Guy Neighbors did not succeed, I was charged with contempt of court in my 2004 divorce case where I was never personally served and subject to only in rem jurisdiction and could not support my family because of the continuing unlawful conduct of state officials including social services officials that kept me from being employable in even warehouse or McDonald’s food preparation jobs.
I contacted the state officials by letter explaining the lack of jurisdiction to enforce money judgments (I had also sent them registered letters in 2007) and why their continued conduct was unlawful and provided them case law that clearly established their violation of my rights for having represented Price’s American Indian infant son and the African American James Bolden’s civil rights claims was unlawful. In retaliation they cut off my food stamps and threatened to jail me.
I was forced to bring causes of action to enjoin the state officials and seek damages in the Shawnee County, State of Kansas court (ATCH 17). However the court ruled that 42 USC § 1981 does not cover white attorneys being retaliated against for their advocacy on behalf of African Americans or the American Indian infant Baby C. This ruling was due to repeated misrepresentations to the court of the controlling federal law by state officials and misrepresentations of the facts.
I also experienced the same de facto denial of property rights in the Johnson County, Kansas court regarding a house I had title to but could not live in or sell (ATCH 14). Both of these matters ended up in federal court where Judge Carlos Murguia and Judge Eric Melgren summarily dismissed my claims contrary to All established and controlling precedent for the court as informal sanctions prior to a show cause order. I sought appellate review in each case, but the Tenth Circuit did not hear the issues I raised and issued an injunction against further filings.
Before the appeal mandates were issued and before the injunction against further filings was ordered, I filed a request for presentation to the federal Grand Jury of the facts in each complaint that documented continuing specific RICO 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961et seq. felonies (ATCH 13-19). The US Attorney for the District of Kansas, Barry Grissom who had initiated the filing sanctions against me in Judge Carlos Murguia’s court refused tosubmit the evidence to a grand jury.
It is my informed belief that the Tenth Circuit panel in opinions authored by Senior Judge John C. Porfilio took the extraordinary measures to not hear my two appeals because of an action for prospective injunctive relief in the District of Columbia, Landrith et al v. John G. Roberts 1:12-cv-01916-ABJ that Samuel Lipari and I have brought to seek redress from the ineffectiveness of judicial ethics complaints, citing the complaints brought in Medical Supply Chain, Inc. v. Novation, et al, KS Dist. Court case no.:05- 2299. And, that the unusual and severe conduct of the panel led by Senior Judge John C. Porfilio of not reviewing the issues I had appealed was a direct effort to interfere with the District of Columbia case that had the foreseeable effect of depriving me of ownership of the $750,00.00 Leawood, Kansas house and of my constitutional and statutory rights in the State of Kansas.
A temporal relationship supporting my belief that the Tenth Circuit panel judges and the Administrator of the Courts had eliminated the judicial independence of the Tenth Circuit required under Judicial Canon 1 in an effort to present the District of Columbia judge the case on 10/18/2013 after an almost one year delay on the Friday after the Tenth Circuit issued the filing injunction order against me. The appearance docket shows a flurry of text only orders on that Friday and the following Monday showing that the official court record had been tampered with and that the judge could not make the dismissal order expected by the conspirators.
In August of this year, I approached different healthcare systems as a sales representative of Medical Supply Chain (now a sole proprietorship operated by Samuel Lipari) and discovered that the Novation LLC restraint of trade through long term anticompetitive contracts still exists. The scheme is also operated by Novation LLC through the Veterans’ Administration despite statutory provisions intended to make bidding open for minority and small business contractors.
I am therefore forwarding to you Samuel Lipari’s antitrust complaint against the Novation cartel members and a RICO complaint he brought against the cartel members that used state officials in Missouri and Kansas to keep him out of even the home health market, a market they do not monopolize in order to keep him from having resources to enter the nationwide hospital supply market and compete against them with his technology to lower healthcare costs.
I am also forwarding my two grand jury requests to you in a demand that you investigate and present this evidence to a grand jury and stop the foreseeable violations to the rights of citizens in the State of Kansas from the unchecked racketeering that deprives them of access to the courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961et seq.
Sincerely, Bret D. Landrith
And, yeah, the “John G Roberts” mentioned as refusing to enforce judicial ethics is none other than the USA’s chief justice. Bend over American people, ‘sam’ enjoys slipping it into your anus as much as any third world nation –
A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.
Any anonymous ‘state secrets’ (e.g. FBI fronting for CIA) finger
Ronald Thomas West 