Archives for category: Uncategorized
« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Covid vs Flu: Where is the Grim Reaper’s Scythe in 2020-2021?

March 17, 2021 //
0

Čitajte na srpskom

“…It is also clear that the overall death rate in 2020 was exceeded by the five years of 1999-2003. I need to define the death rate here, as it is based on the deaths per thousand people, which eliminates the fact that populations were lower in earlier years. It’s a given that larger population might have a higher death total from a given disease, but not a higher death rate. Diseases work on the susceptible individuals of a population and, thus, it is a proportion of the population that becomes ill or dies.

“That said, how does the death rate in the UK for 2020 compare to previous years? It is clear that the death rate in the UK for 2020 was not exceptional compared to previous years. How can that be? If you have Covid-19 as well as influenza killing people, what is going on? An observation has been made that, for some mysterious reason, influenza, as of April in the US, dropped to zero and continues at zero in the latest flu season.

“In light of the apparent missing influenza, claims have been made that masking, distancing, and lockdowns were completely effective against influenza, but then there is no talk about its failure in stopping Covid-19, which is a virus of the same size and transmission mode.

“Then, we are told that Covid is still around because people are not masking and such properly, which means influenza should also still be around in the US. Since these are infectious viruses, how can these restrictions be effective against one virus and not the other? It does not make sense.

“It is also easy to find that US states with strict mandates have the same rates of PCR-positive cases as those who do not. The conjecture can be made that influenza cases are largely reported as Covid-19, based either on a positive PCR test result or on symptoms alone.

“In the US, it is clear that there has been a monetary incentive for diagnosing the disease and encouraging hospitalizations. The cessation of other medical procedures and tests during this period clearly is going to lead to increased overall deaths. The fact that there appears to be no excess deaths despite this, indicates that the C-19 virus itself was not as lethal as they claim.

“Overall, the death rate in the UK is not out of line with the normal death rates from other years and clearly not close to the highest in the last 22 years. It is difficult to consider influenza deaths when there appears to be a bias toward categorizing influenza and other causes as Covid-19 deaths.

“Every year and, for that matter, all year long, there is a population of health-critical individuals who may be overwhelmed by a flu-like illness and open to pneumonia complications. The questionable Covid-19 PCR test appears to be keeping the presence of Covid-19 alive, possibly detecting viruses of the current flu season.

“The WHO is now admitting that that this test can be 97% false positives or more, with higher processing cycle numbers. The argument could be made that we have an epidemic of [false positive] testing…”

Or so says PhD biologist Banson Wilcot at ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International. [1]

So, I looked up several references not related to the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site itself on the subject of how the ‘flu vanished’ and Wilcot seems to spot on.

Why? I was trying to make sense of Covid numbers in Serbia (that don’t make sense) and Wilcot’s was the first article I’d come across that addressed the issue in a sensible way. Specifically, I wanted to know how a vicious pathogen (Covid) could justify pandemic “measures” when the national mortality rate for the year 2020 hadn’t spiked (at all) in comparison to previous years:

Graph: Serbia’s death rate has been flat at 13.2 deaths average per 1,000 for the past four years; 2017, 2018, 2019 & 2020. [2]

The ‘fringe conspiracy’ site then caused me to look at other statistics to establish (or disestablish) its veracity while casting a wider net to see what is going on elsewhere in comparison to Serbia and violà! The so-called ‘progressive’ site VOX News supports two points made by ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot:

1) Flu has virtually vanished in the USA (VOX graph credit to Center for Disease Control and Prevention) for the 2020-2021 statistical season &  2) the VOX article upholds the oxymoron pointed out by Wilcot; crediting masks for the ‘historic’ low level of flu in the same environment where masks have NOT halted the spread of Covid, a disease spread by identical method. Clearly, someone is not being honest concerning the ‘vanished flu’ phenomenon and it would appear that dishonest someone is VOX and is NOT ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Wilcot. [3]

Now, for some initial perspective on what certainly appear to be grossly inflated figures ascribed to Covid in the USA with highly unreliable PCR tests as well as forgoing tests for other pathogens (includes the vanished flu and likely many tens of thousands of deaths by other pathogens and related underlying cause such as frail health or any other reason wrongly attributed to Covid.) [4]

If we take the roughly 500,000 deaths ‘attributed’ to Covid in the USA and apply that as a percentage to the USA population of about 330 million for the 2020-2021 season, Americans arrived at sacrificing their civil liberties for a 0.15% gross population Covid death rate that relies on severely inflated (official) Covid numbers incorporating the missing flu and untold other causes of death such as stress related deaths due to underlying health issues aggravated by lock-downs, Covid related policies pushing people into poverty & higher mortality, America’s staggering problem with obesity (Covid kills obese people in high numbers), attrition in America’s exploding homeless population et cetera. These numbers won’t be properly sorted before years of study but in the meanwhile a highly politicized (Dr ‘Faustus’ driven) Covid panic-power grab dishonestly lumps everything together. Bolstering Wilcot’s account:

“I still can’t find 500,000 excess deaths caused by Covid in 2020; they’re simply not there among the diseases the CDC reported out and since the base risk is 1/50,000 even across half the population being infected we could only account for 3,000 deaths. It is thus clear that if in fact Covid-19 has killed anywhere near the number of people claimed those other morbid conditions, all of which are serious diseases standing alone, have to account for the increase between them. Indeed the most-common, by far (40% of additional deaths by disease) were due to heart attacks and the next was diabetes at 13%. Between diabetes and heart attacks, both almost-exclusively due to lifestyle choices and thus your personal decisions, 53% of the excess 120,475 deaths are accounted for. If we add in strokes, which also are largely lifestyle-related then we’re at about 2/3rds.

Among those diseases that are allegedly “the biggest comorbid factors” I can find only 120,475 more deaths that Covid-19 may have contributed to and which included those diseases as a causal factor in total. Did Covid-19 cause all of those 120,000 additional deaths or were they caused by, in the case of diabetes, strokes and heart attacks for example, the additional 50lbs that a material percentage of people put on during the lockdowns (and over 20lbs on average!) from eating takeout trash full of fast carbs and being involuntarily cooped up in their homes? We do not know so this can only describe an upper boundary or caused mortality — not a lower one. This analysis doesn’t mean even more people didn’t die with Covid, but an alleged “Covid” death that wasn’t accompanied by one of the CDC’s specifically-called out diseases” (maybe those 500,000 USA covid deaths don’t actually exist: 24 April 2021 update, read it HERE)

As pointed out by Wilcot, the official USA numbers (that don’t add up) are consistent with what is observed in the United Kingdom’s data. It should be expected this will be the case elsewhere.

Back to Serbia:

If we take the ‘official’ Covid death rate 0.9% or 4,700 deaths (necessarily includes the ‘missing’ flu and other untold manner of death) and rather than apply this to what should be called ‘the includes false positives aggregate’ or 516,000 (reported positives) and instead apply this official death statistic (4,700) attributed to Covid to the 8,700,000 population of Serbia as whole (includes untested & tested negative) to arrive at 0.05%, it is only then a flat national death rate (no significant statistical increase) for the ‘pandemic’ year 2020 begins to make sense because it is only then we can understand what happened to the ‘missing’ flu and other, untold manner of death. They’ve been folded into the Covid statistic. There is no other straightforward explanation. [5]

Now that ‘fringe conspiracy’ author Banson Wilcot PhD is vindicated, let’s shortly note one other article at the ‘offending’ site Principia Scientific International on Covid: the article by another PhD (psychology), Dr Elsa Schieder, on Ivermectin. In short, she simply states what is known to be a scientifically established fact; Ivermectin cures Covid, except in those states that suppress this information about an effective, generic (cheap) drug that should render the vaccine hysteria moot. [6], [7]

The inescapable conclusion is that Covid, although real, and in some cases deadly, is not nearly so lethal on a societal-wide basis as it is presented to us, and need not be nearly so lethal as it presently is. The obvious question is why?

Social Analysis

Firstly, in Western cultures particularly, people lie to themselves, especially when it comes to pecuniary interests versus altruism. There is big money in addressing Covid as a (blown out of proportion) ‘pandemic’ and self importance takes on altruism as a lie (self deceit of doing the right thing) when in fact it is the pecuniary interests (money is power) driving the urge to control. So, the Covid ‘pandemic’ is not as much a conspiracy to control populations (even as strategies are devised to do this) as much as it is a self-importance inflating, power driven meme.

Western style politicians (taking bait from the sociopath oligarchs fishing for them with lobbyists) are narcissists, and narcissists are those personality constructs which are most prone to self deceits. In lay terms, it should be said our leaders are self-aggrandizing morons incapable of comprehending the damage they are causing is by far worse than the damage which should happen if they were to step out of the way, stop politicizing medicine and let the community doctors do their job with a full set of Covid facts available to them (e.g. treat with Ivermectin.)

Insofar as the ‘fringe conspiracy’ site Principia Scientific International, well, in fact it harbors an Islamophobe associated personality like the Dr Elsa Schieder mentioned above, who it just happens provided accurate information on Ivermectin, together with any number of other trained scientists who do not (for whatever reasons) find a place in mainstream to have a voice. What does it say about Western culture when searching for the better information, one finds it at a site that is not entirely wholesome? How is that somehow more damning than the Western media lies we are fed every day by corporate entities protecting the interests of Western oligarchs and their corrupt self (and societal-wide) political deceits concerning Covid, leading to unnecessary loss of life?

[1] https://principia-scientific.com/uk-covid-conundrum-the-mysterious-case-of-disappearing-flu/

[2] https://knoema.com/atlas/Serbia/Death-rate

[3] https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/22272237/flu-cases-down-historic-what-does-it-mean

[4] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html

[5] https://www.telegraf.rs/english/3313670-serbian-government-to-adopt-stricter-covid-measures-upper-elementary-school-grades-switch-online

[6] https://principia-scientific.com/ivermectin-miracle-drug-against-covid-19/

[7] https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

 

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Tags , , , ,
Categories corruption, crime, information operations, Morons, politics, propaganda, science, survival, Uncategorized

Kovid: Suzbijanje naučnih kontra-narativa

March 13, 2021 //
0

Read in English

Facebook, Twitter i Youtube (‘veliki momci’), svi u ulozi vratara:

„Rat protiv „dezinformacija“ zahteva dve žrtve. Istinu. I pravo na lečenje.“

@ https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

Arhiva (1) https://archive.li/tXJNW

Arhiva (2) https://archive.li/gmm3N (Čitajte na srpskom)

Piše Meri Bet Fajfer
Trenutno se vode dve bitke za javno zdravlje.

Prva je, naravno, protiv koronavirusa.

Druga cilja u široku i amorfnu ​​metu zvanu „medicinske dezinformacije“. Cilj ove kampanje je da, barem delimično, kontroliše šta ljudi čitaju, vide i znaju o potencijalnim tretmanima KOVIDA-19. Nepokolebljivo na svom nišanu ima jedan jeftini, generički lek koji bi mogao preokrenuti ovu pandemiju, ivermektin.

U ovoj drugoj borbi,YouTube video snimci su uklonjeni. Twitter nalozi sa hiljadama pratilaca su ugašeni. Facebook objave i grupe su nestale. Ovo su očigledna dela cenzure ivermektina i drugih mogućnosti za lečenje.

Malo je prikrivenija odbojnost glavnih medija prema izveštavanju o praktično bilo čemu što obećava lečenje KOVID-a u ranoj fazi bolesti, uključujući 42 studije koje zajednički kažu da bi ivermektin mogao smanjiti smrtnost od KOVID-a za 75 do 83 procenta. Ono malo što se izveštava je da je ivermektin eksperimentalan i nedokazan – lek koji se koristi za lečenje šuge i rečnog slepila kod ljudi i parazita na konjima.

Možda je iz tih razloga Šeril Džeret (64), u početku, odbila predlog svog lekara da uzima ivermektin, kada joj je dijagnostifikovao nešto što je izgledalo kao blagi slučaj KOVID-a. Predomislila se trećeg dana, kada se borila za dah nakon što se popela stepenicama, a snimak je pokazao da je KOVID zahvatio 25 posto njenih pluća.

„Uzela sam ga“, rekla mi je. „U roku od 2 sata bila sam dobro.“ Ponovo je pokušala da se popenje stepenicama. Bez problema.

Mnogo je priča poput Džeretove. Nećete ih naći u štampi ili na Vikipediji, uobičajenom izvoru informacija o ivermektinu. Podelite ih na Facebook-u i možda će vam zabraniti objavljivanje, što se nedavno dogodilo lekaru Džeretove, Brusu Borosu.

Kontrola poruka o ivermektinu se navodno vrši pod paravanom zaštite javnog zdravlja. Ali umesto toga, prema intervjuima sa advokatima, lekarima i analitičarima ovaj napor ima suprotan efekat,.

„Vodi se rat protiv dezinformacija koji šteti dobrim informacijama“, rekao je dr Pjer Kori, predsednik grupe lekara koji zagovaraju lek nazvan Frontline KOVID-19 Udruženje intenzivne nege ili FLCCC. „Imamo sve podatke koji pokazuju korist ivermektina kada je u pitanju velika smrtnost. Što se manje o tome zna, to je više smrtnih slučajeva. “

Gde je sve počelo
Pokušaj upravljanja informacijama o lečenju KOVID-a svoje korene delimično vuče iz tužnog poglavlja američke nauke i novinarstva: Trampova podrška prošlog proleća hidroksihlorokinu (HCQ). U trenu je lečenje u ranoj fazi pretvoreno u desničarski mit koji zanima samo Fox News. Ostatak štampe je nemilosrdno ponavljao tvrdnje da je pouzdani farmaceutski proizvod koji se koristi za nekoliko bolesti opasan za KOVID. Mnogo studija je to pobilo i pokazalo delotvornost u ranoj fazi bolesti, što većina ljudi ne zna. Dr Mobin Sajed bio je među prvima, marta prošle godine, koji je istražio potencijal HCQ-a u YouTube video snimku koji je postao viralan i doveo ga u žižu podele na one koji ga vole i one koji ga mrze, na desnicu i levicu. „Počeo sam da primam toliko pretnji“, rekao je, što ga je podstaklo da sam ukloni objavu.

Posle toga, međutim, YouTube je sam odlučio šta bi trebalo da vidi 250.000 pratilaca Medicinskih predavanja Drbeen, uklanjajući prinudno video zapise o vitaminu D, remdesiviru i, što su drugi rekli da je često bilo cenzurisano, ivermektinu.

Drugi primeri ovog novog trenda cenzurisanja:

* 31. januara Facebook je uklonio stranicu pod nazivom „Ivermectin for MDs Team“, sa 10.200 članova iz više od 100 zemalja. Poslednja kap koja je prelila čašu bila je objava o odluci slovačkog Ministarstva zdravlja da dozvoli upotrebu ivermektina, za koji cenzori Fejsbuka „veruju da je štetan za fizički integritet“, napisao je administrator. Facebook je takođe presudio da su vesti o odobrenju ivermektina od strane južne države u Brazilu kršile njegove standarde. Drugim rečima, gigantu društvenih medija nisu se svidele odluke dve nezavisne vlade i smatrao je da on zna bolje.

* 12. januara, Twitter je presudio da je tvit brazilskog Ministarstva zdravlja – 1,2 miliona pratilaca – „širio obmanjujuće i potencijalno štetne informacije“. Zašto? Pozivao je ljude sa simptomima KOVID-a da „odu u zdravstvenu jedinicu i zatraže rano lečenje“.

* Još nečuvenije, YouTube je nedavno izbrisao dva video zapisa koja je objavio komitet američkog Senata o svedočenju dr Kori o ivermektinu. Dalje, uklonio je video u kojem je naučnik govorio o svom prikazu ivermektina kao delu projekta agencije Unitaid čiji je domaćin Svetska zdravstvena organizacija. YouTube je čak uklonio video zapis o svojoj cenzuri ivermektina.

U nagoveštaju koliko je velika cenzura, Facebook je ponosno potvrdio u objavi na vebsajtu 8. februara da je „uklonio više od 12 miliona objava na Facebook-u i Instagramu koji sadrže dezinformacije koje mogu dovesti do neizbežne fizičke štete“. Sedam mojih postova, o članku koji sam napisala sa višestrukim linkovima ka naučnim objašnjenjima o ivermektinu, bilo je pogođeno tom oznakom. (Dospela sam na 14-satnu zabranu objavljivanja).

Moji napori da Facebook, Twitter ili Google, koji poseduje YouTube, daju objašnjenje metodologije koju koriste za cenzuru, ostali su jalovi. U javnoj objavi YouTube kaže da ne dozvoljava informacije koje su „u suprotnosti sa lokalnim zdravstvenim vlastima“ i Svetskom zdravstvenom organizacijom. Twitter tvrdi da uklanja „sadržaj koji je očigledno lažan ili obmanjujući i može dovesti do značajnog rizika nanošenja štete“.

Ali ko zapravo odlučuje o videu ili postu? Da li odluke donose algoritmi koje su podesili tehničari ili naučnici i lekari? Da li smernice vlade treba da budu krajnje merilo kada se ove stvari razvijaju – ponekad i pogrešno?

Na početku KOVID-a, zvaničnici su zapravo savetovali da se ne nose maske i da se KOVID ne leči kortikosteroidima; sada su to uobičajene prakse koje spasavaju živote.

Štaviše, vladine odluke u prethodnoj pošasti pokazuju koliko vlade mogu biti sklone greškama. Godine 1987. aktivisti za HIV-AIDS molili su dr Entonija Faučija da odobri upotrebu Bactrima i drugih sulfa lekova za sprečavanje virulentne upale pluća povezane sa AIDS-om. Vlada je čekala dve godine na dodatne podatke, tokom kojih je, kako je Šon Strab u svojim memoarima „Brojanje tela“ prebrojao, umrlo 17.000 ljudi.

Ono što je Fauči tada želeo, i želi i danas, je veća, bolja, dobro osmišljena studija – čak i ako je rezultat čekanja veći broj preminulih.

Stiv Kirš, kalifornijski preduzetnik, finansirao je istraživanje o antidepresivu koji se pretvorio u anti-KOVID tretman nazvan fluvoksamin i koji uveliko obećava zaustavljanje KOVID-a u ranoj fazi. Kao i kod ivermektina, lek nailazi na otpor.

U članku objavljenom 26. februara na Quora, Kirš je argumentovao da se granica za prihvatanje već odobrenih lekova mora spustiti, s obzirom na njihovu poznatu sigurnost i efikasnost. „Danas imamo lečenja zasnovana na dokazima koja imaju veliku verovatnoću da značajno smanje hospitalizaciju i smrt … praktično bez povećanja rizika“, napisao je. „Stoga su pogrešni i bespotrebni gubici života zbog „čekanja na više podataka “.“ Naveo je da su fluvoksamin i ivermektin dva najperspektivnija leka za lečenje KOVID-a u ranoj fazi bolesti.

Veliki Brat na Delu
Twitter je 27. decembra suspendovao nalog pod nazivom @COVIDAnalysis, koji je pratilo skoro 7.000 ljudi. Taj nalog, koji su vodili anonimni naučnici, rutinski je objavio tvit o istraživanju lečenja KOVID-a, i nastavio da rezimira i analizira njegove implikacije na svom vebsajtu.

Nisam usamljena u oslanjanju na njegovo poučno tumačenje, koje ponekad stane u zaštitu, a ponekad kritikuje.
Twitter nije pružio nikakvo upozorenje pre gašenja naloga i od tada nije odgovorio na zahtev grupe za objašnjenjem. Komentar jednog pratioca @c19d3k2, „Zaista moram da se zapitam koliko smo blizu same ivice #1984 već sada.“

Ugašeni su i drugi nalozi, uključujući onaj istaknutog i pristalice hidroksihlorokina u ranoj fazi, dr Zeva Zelenka, koji je imao više od 150.000 pratilaca.

Na trenutak ostavite po strani implikacije napora da se kontroliše ono što Amerikanci i građani širom sveta znaju – o bilo čemu. Ne tako davno, takva kontrola je bila nezamisliva.

Sada uzmite u obzir da je ivermektin lek koji je odobrila FDA i koji se nalazi na listi osnovnih lekova SZO. Među više od tri desetine ispitivanja nalazi se 19 recenziranih studija i 21 randomizovano kontrolisano ispitivanje. Oni pokazuju da ivermektin deluje u različitim fazama protiv virusa SARS-CoV-2. Zaustavio je infekciju prehlade kod zdravstvenih radnika u tri argentinske studije i jednoj u kojoj je učestvovalo 4.000 ljudi u Indiji. Zaustavio je bolest u ranoj fazi u studijama iz Pakistana i Bangladeša. Održao je ljude u životu u Egiptu i u studiji u okrugu Brauard, na Floridi.
Lekari to uglavnom ne znaju. Ni šira javnost.

Pronašla sam previše primera cenzure lečenja u ranoj fazi da bih ih sve ovde nabrojala, uključujući brisanje Facebook grupe sa 4.000 članova pod nazivom COVEXIT.com koja često raspravlja o hidroksihlorokinu i uklanjanje popularnog video zapisa dr Kristi Rizinger koja moli regulatorna tela da razmotre naučne činjenice o ivermektinu. Ipak, zamračenje sigurno nije potpuno. Na YouTube-u, Facebook-u i Twitter-u još uvek ima puno podataka o ivermektinu.

Ali cenzorski nož, prikaz leka kao konstrukcije desnice i otpor medija da izveštavaju o bilo čemu vezanom za lečenje u ranoj fazi uzeli su danak. Čini se da je ivermektin neprihvatljiv u javnoj raspravi o lečenju KOVID-a u ranoj fazi bolesti. Evo kako se ovo odvija: Tri izveštaja za štampu istraživala su bezbrojne faktore koji redukuju KOVID u Indiji – NPR (National Public Radio), Wall Street Journal i Washington Post. Pa ipak, upadljivo je da niko od njih nije pomenuo lečenje, uprkos široko rasprostranjenoj indijskoj upotrebi ivermektina i hidroksihlorokina, što je sigurno zaslužilo raspravu.

Pitala sam nadaleko objavljivanu naučnu spisateljicu Ester Landuis o njenim razmišljanjima o ovome: „Generalno se čini da je prepolitizovani debakl sa hidroksihlorokinom pomutio vode glavnim naučnim časopisima“, rekla mi je. „Mnogi se plaše da pogreše u vezi sa još jednim lekom kome bi bila promenjena namena; čekaju konačne podatke iz faze tri RCT (randomizovanog kontrolisanog ispitivanja) sa hiljadama pacijenata.“

Rezime prećutkivanja
Istraživanje ivermektina pokazuje da je lek najefikasniji u sprečavanju i zaustavljanju infekcije u ranoj fazi – upotreba koja će doprineti da ljudi ne završe u bolnici i sprečiti simptome na duge staze. Ipak, cenzura ivermektina lišava pacijente lečenja sigurnim lekom koji bi mogao da se koristi za tu namenu i uz informisani pristanak. Mnogi lekovi se koriste na ovaj način, posebno u odeljenjima za intenzivnu negu, gde se pacijentima može davati desetak lekova u nadi da će neki delovati.

Ali zatražite ivermektin za člana porodice i verovatno će vam reći, kao što je rečeno jednom članu porodice pacijenta: „Ovde to ne koristimo“. Kao posledica toga, porodice hospitalizovanih pacijenata ponekad ulažu velike napore da bi ga dobili.

Porodica muškarca iz Teksasa (67) planirala je da mu prošvercuje ivermektin u hrani, a zatim su dali advokatu da interveniše da se obezbedi lek. Dve porodice iz države Njujork dobile su sudske naloge kojima se ženama, starim 80 i 65 godina, dozvoljava davanje ivermektina – ali da im prepišu samo njihovi lični lekari. Kada je dr Erika Espinoza mislila da će izgubiti muža – takođe lekara – zbog KOVIDA-19, sredila je da ga prebaci u bolnicu u Hjustonu (odbilo ju je šest vazdušnih kompanija za hitnu pomoć), zato što primenjuje protokol koji uključuje ivermektin. Malo bolnica primenjuje takav protokol.

U ta četiri slučaja, svi osim muškarca iz Teksasa, oporavili su se nakon što su dobili ivermektin, a odlaganje lečenja njime sigurno nije pomoglo. Njegova smrt 5. februara razorila je njegovu porodicu; ostavio je suprugu sa kojom je bio 40 godina, dva sina i snahe i šestoro unučadi.
Doktor Brus Boros, lekar Šeril Džeret i vlasnik tri centra za hitnu negu u Florida Kis, nedavno je odslužio ono što on i drugi nazivaju „Facebook zatvorom“, naišavši na cenzore ivermektina. To je, međutim, mačji kašalj za Borosa, koji je lečio jednog hospitalizovanog pacijenta Kajla Kartera, kome je isporučio ivermektin do kreveta i uputio ga telefonom koliko treba da uzme. (Bolnica je rekla da nije imala lek, a zatim je odložila davanje, dok se Karter borio da diše).

„U roku od 12 sati,“ rekao mi je Karter, „osećao sam se prilično fantastično. Znao sam da se nešto promenilo.“ Još uvek ne zna da li je bolnica znala da je uzimao ivermektin.

Dve stotine pacijenata kasnije, Boros kaže sledeće: „Ako vam lekar ovo ne da, potražite drugog lekara“.

Kao da je to tako lako.

***Meri Bet Fajfer je istraživački novinar i autor dve knjige. Njena web stranica: http://www.thefirstepidemic.com.

Imajte na umu da su stavovi izraženi u ovom članku mišljenje autora i ne nužno stav kompanije TrialSite News LLC.

[1] https://c19ivermectin.com/

[2] https://www.ijidonline.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1201-9712%2820%2932235-9

[3] https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

[4] https://about.fb.com/news/2021/02/reaching-billions-of-people-with-covid-19-vaccine-information/

[5] https://trialsitenews.com/not-using-ivermectin-one-year-in-is-unethical-and-immoral/

[6] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295

[7] https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Body-Counts/Sean-Strub/9781451661965

[8] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2773108?resultClick=24

[9] https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-cure-for-COVID-19/answer/Steve-Kirsch?share=1

[10] https://c19study.com/

[11] https://c19ivermectin.com/twitter.html

[12] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04701710

[13] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-208785/v1

[14] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3734478

[15] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220325066

[16] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v3

[17] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369220348984/pdf

[18] https://covexit.com/facebook-takes-down-our-group/

[19] https://buffalonews.com/news/local/2nd-wny-hospital-ordered-to-treat-covid-19-patient-with-experimental-drug/article_f32339f0-5d01-11eb-b752-4f8966804581.html#tracking-source=in-article

[20] Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru: 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p=.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted

 

*

iRNK: „To je genska terapija, a ne vakcina“

Kovid vs grip: Gde je kosa, alatka Smrti, u 2020-2021?

*

Srbija

Tags , ,
Categories Uncategorized

Kiev Should Soon Be In Russia

March 13, 2021 //
0

Update 15 January 2022: I’m not so optimistic now. Anything could happen including Russia initiating a preemptive strike and the entire business spiraling out of control per the more recent assessments and escalating hostility of Russia in the face of NATO’s perennial (and disingenuous) ‘let’s talk’ stalling tactics as Russia is backed up against the wall by NATO advanced weapon systems deployments in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, this article is still worth a read:

“We see 100,000 ukrop troops on the Front, scores of trainloads of troops, armor, ammo and fuel moved into the Donbass region, we hear the heated rhetoric, the preparations for war on both sides of the info sphere”

Or so states my well connected source in Donbass, speaking of activities on either side of the (momentarily) ‘frozen’ conflict. Never mind the Ukrainian military has been shelling the ethnic Russian ‘separatists’ with heavy artillery for weeks (a small detail neglected in Western press.)

When the shit hits the fan on the Donbass (Eastern Ukraine) battlefields again, it will be  a ‘surprise’ and no doubt posed in Western press as a pre-planned ‘act of treachery’ by the ‘Perennially evil Putin’ in the next gambit of the ‘Great Game’ by empire (NATO.)

NATO actually doesn’t give a rats ass for Ukraine other than to use the dumber than f**k nazis (they’d put in charge in the 2014 coup) as cannon fodder to injure & make Russia into a boogeyman. Götterdämmerung? Well, the Western states running with a 19th Century empire mentality in a highly unstable 21st Century always poses the possibility but probably not (yet.) The European NATO states are in no shape to take on Russia, never-minding Russia has no inclination to reoccupy Europe. Of course, as well Russia cannot stand by and allow Kiev to run over the ethnic Russian majority East of the Dnieper river and open to NATO a corridor on the border of Russia’s European heartland. Russia WILL defend the Donbass.

Everyone knows (West & East) that Ukraine is not a viable state as constituted; the Western (Ruthenian) people (especially along the border with Poland) have been long subverted away from their Orthodox roots and are unrecognizable as the same ethnic people (Rusyn) in Belarus, Hungary, Serbia and trans-Carpathia in Ukraine. These people (Ruthenian-Rusyn) have been targeted by cultural subversion for a couple of hundred years in Catholic associated empire (Habsburg, et al) efforts to wrest their identity away from Kievian Rus and ethnic/cultural kinship with Russia. There is  really little new in this; a historical inheritance predating the Nazi proper invasion and predating Napoleon’s invasion of Russia back to the Swedish invasion at the beginning of the 18th Century. Western empire in several incarnations have coveted Russia for over three centuries, and the Western Ukrainians (ethnic Ruthenians, actually) would be naturally aligned with the Polish who’d Catholicized them and it should come as little surprise these people sided with the Nazis (proper) in WWII because they cannot be rehabilitated in any sense of coexistence with Russia and Russians.

It is in the region of the Polish border where the Ukrainian (Nazi collaborator) Stephan Bandera nazi element/legacy is absolutely entrenched (formerly Orthodox but now ‘Eastern Rite’ Catholics answering to Rome), a community deeply saturated with antipathy to Russia and these ‘people’ (if they can recalled that) will never integrate to a Ukraine of the East with its majority ethnic Russian (Orthodox) population. Both sides (NATO/Russia) know this.

Rather than negotiate a reasonable divorce that would split Ukraine into two states with the Dnieper River as the rough boundary (Kiev and Odessa should be in the East) along ethnic lines, NATO simply intends the inevitable Ukraine breakup will happen in such a way as to make Russia into the Western Press’ boogeyman.

I doubt it’s going to lead to WWIII, Europe isn’t ready for this war, it’ll likely just work out as an expensive exercise to make Russia into the villain, little more than that. How much territory Russia will take will depend on kinetic developments to some extent… but I expect Kiev and Odessa could easily be annexed to Russia (perhaps later divided between Russia and a ‘proper’ Ukraine.) There’s possibility of a triple partition; in general terms an ethnic Ruthenian Western (Poland border area) ‘nazified’ sector nobody will want, a central sector populated in majority by proper ethnic Ukrainians and East of the Dnieper which is largely ethnic Russian majority.

The nazis (literally represented in Azov Battalion et al) will begin their offensive and the Russian army will outflank the Donbass front and cut off the Ukrainian supply lines (taking Kiev in the process) and NATO, after having pumped in enough weapons and munitions to insure a bloodbath, will allow the Ukrainian military to be crushed. This will be the West’s convenient means of disposing of the most radical (out of the closet) nazis, a big no-no (the 21st Century’s nazi meme in the guise of NATO disallows flying any flag except the false flag of democracy.)

No matter the immense amount of casualties this will cause, ‘the more blood the better’ from the Western intelligence agencies propaganda apparatchiks point of view as the entire Western world is propagandized concerning ‘Evil Putin’ and ‘crude Russian aggression.’ Thus, the de facto split of Ukraine is accomplished in a comic strip written by Satan where Western Ukraine (what Russia won’t care to absorb) will be propped up by the West with psychologically infantile territorial claim over a Russian population they had terrorized since February 2014.

Russia will be compelled to defend the Donbass, but for appearances (international law) sake, will have to let the nazis initiate the war, resulting in much higher casualties. ‘Preemptive War’ is an international law oxymoron embraced solely by lawless regimes and adhering to the law is a disadvantage Russia will overcome in it’s impatience that finally decides the most economical means of settling the issue is to evict the nazis altogether from territory East of the Dnieper. Of course the West’s propagandists will take this opportunity to convince its gullible populations ‘Russia’s aggression’ justifies immense, new and limitless armaments purchases in a spiraling out of control geopolitical tension that must inevitably lead to the West’s Götterdämmerung after all.

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Tags , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories crime, information operations, intelligence, international law, Morons, politics, propaganda, State Terror, Uncategorized, war crimes

Greed, Sneetches, Shmoos & the ‘N’ Word (lots of the n-word)

March 6, 2021 //
0

When greed supersedes racism, suddenly, ‘everyone is a nigger.’ Trump’s manipulated ‘white trash’ or ‘crackers’ had failed to understand it is identical underlying force, greed, and greed’s attending model of exploitation, had been the origin of chattel slavery that now underwrites the collapse of the blue collar, white middle class. We shouldn’t blame Trump for creating the conditions creating a new class of honky crackers (globalism did that) but certainly Trump exploited their ‘hope’ when he surrounded himself with world class criminal sociopaths on the extreme right of the 1% (the 2019 Trump cabinet included 17 millionaires, 2 one hundred million plus millionaires and 1 billionaire; altogether worth $3.2 billion.) Any expectation this crew would have sacrificed any portion of their fortunes (via profit losses) by reinvesting in the USA rather than cheap, outsourced labor, is fantasy par excellence. We’re all ‘niggers’ now, not to mention ‘useless eaters.’

What has manifest since Bill Clinton deregulated the American economy is a form of 21st Century slavery that doesn’t give a damn for the color of your skin and it doesn’t matter to any of the 1% whether your ‘master’ is on the left or right. Just don’t hurt the bottom line (profit) because the underlying motive is ‘all you stupid white niggers, if the global 1% can get you all fighting with (the dumber than fuck) antifa, as well as hating blacks, Mexicans, kulaks and chinks, we’ll never have to worry about y’all getting together to throw us out.’ So, listen up, whitey, here’s the what and how behind the modern rendition of what’s happening to you, with a relevant thumbnail history:

When America’s ‘European morality’ had ‘matured’ and the abolition of slavery became a political expediency of Abraham Lincoln…

“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that”

…following the war which ‘saved the union’, ’emancipation’ was morphed into 100 years of ‘Jim Crow era’ where freed slaves and their descendants were denied voting rights and were literally “barbecued” or lynched after having been tortured to death, sometimes burned alive or dragged to death, with large attending crowds photographed with the dead  victims at these events made into postcards that were delivered by the United States Postal Service.

In fact Lincoln (and his successors) didn’t give a rat’s ass for the civil rights of blacks, he just wanted (and did) what was necessary to keep his political power intact while serving an industrialized North with it’s own system of chattel exploitation (keep reading.)

Abandoning their ’40 acres and a mule’ (a sort of compensation towards a ‘new’ post-slavery life) in droves, over six million blacks fled the South’s ‘crackermania’, migrating to cities in the West and North of the USA where they took the bait of the industrial corporations offers of factory work; that is, until the factories were no longer profitable and the corporations abandoned these communities to their own devices with little opportunity at community advancement or even sustaining what they’d gained in the short term. Locked into a subsequent social prejudice driven poverty with menial labor afforded to the LUCKY ONES, that’s the short history leading to America’s ‘black slums.’ Nobody with the political power to repair this actually gave a damn, they were all bought then, little different to now.

That’s the principle, in short, of what drives today’s globalism and makes everyone poor, regardless of color of skin. Corporations have taken their capital out of America’s communities to invest in cheaper labor abroad and the white working class is collapsing into the same poverty that had been the experience of the black communities previous to this. Now, how’s it feel to be the ‘nigger’? And it doesn’t stop there, because when they decide you’re too much burden, or think you’re becoming ‘uppity’, they’ll ‘barbecue’ you too (little different to any hellfire missile launched outside the empire’s “homeland”)

Maybe, just maybe, whitey, y’all should look at setting some history aside and begin negotiating some détente and political alliances with black people in the lower middle class communities you should be grateful hadn’t adopted the attitude of ‘the only good cracker is a dead cracker.’ From there alliances might be bridged deeper into those ghettos with a seething anger at what had happened to them and what is now happening to you. Nobody has to be in love, only reasoned, civil and fair.

The concluding reality is, if the 1% are Sneetches decorated with stars, and Trump is a Sneetch with a star, what Trump actually promised you, that is recovering the short lived ‘golden age’ of the white America of the 1950s, that horse has bolted the barn. It ain’t coming back and the Sneetches with stars who stole it from you aren’t going to share the wealth because criminals don’t voluntarily surrender their business models. Whatever opportunities might exist aren’t going to manifest from nostalgia; and they won’t manifest at all so long as the filthy rich can keep you all hating, divided and fighting from a stance of ignorance.

A closing note would be to the crackers’ adversaries, that is libtards in general, Black Lives Matter (shouldn’t all life matter?) and antifa; insofar as the one percent millionaire and de facto President Harris using you like the idiots you are, you’re dumber than this cracker portrayed wondering at a life in a world that never did exist and never will exist:

She’s an incarceration queen chosen by corporate boards to protect their wealth from you, anyone and everyone, end of story. Maybe all you libtards should look at opening a dialogue with the ‘crackers’ … because if you were actually ‘woke’ you’d understand we’re all niggers now.

*

Some serious reading:

[1] https://www.abhmuseum.org/one-hundred-years-of-jim-crow/

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-17/this-map-of-u-s-lynchings-spans-1835-to-1964

[3] https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2019/07/25/the-definitive-net-worth-of-donald-trumps-cabinet/?sh=1fcf913c6a15

[4] https://www.opensecrets.org/personal-finances/Kamala-Harris/assets?cid=N00036915&year=2018

[5] https://nypost.com/2020/08/12/inside-kamala-harris-polarizing-record-as-a-prosecutor/

Tags , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories corruption, Morons, politics, satire, social responsibility, State Terror, survival, Uncategorized

Covid: Suppression of Scientific Counter-Narratives

March 5, 2021 //
0

Čitajte na srpskom

Facebook, Twitter & Youtube (the ‘big boys’), all playing gatekeeper:

“The War on ‘Misinformation’ Claims Two Victims. Truth. And the Right to Treatment.”

At: https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

Archived at: https://archive.li/tXJNW

By Mary Beth Pfeiffer

Two public health battles are being waged right now.

The first, of course, is against the coronavirus.

The second has its sights on a broad and amorphous target called “medical misinformation.” This campaign aims, at least in part, to control what people read, see and know about potential treatments for COVID-19. Firmly in its crosshairs is a cheap, generic drug that just might turn this pandemic around, ivermectin.

In this second battle, YouTube videos are removed. Twitter accounts with thousands of followers are purged. Facebook posts and groups are disappeared. These are the overt acts of censorship of ivermectin and other treatment contenders.

More covert is the mainstream media’s aversion to reporting virtually anything promising about early COVID treatment, including on 42 studies that collectively say ivermectin could reduce COVID deaths by 75 to 83 percent. What little is reported is that ivermectin is experimental and unproven – a drug that’s used to treat scabies and river blindness in people and parasites in horses.

For perhaps those reasons, Cheryl Jarrett, 64, initially rejected her doctor’s suggestion that she take ivermectin when diagnosed with what seemed a mild case of COVID. She changed her mind on day three, when she struggled to breathe after climbing her stairs, and a scan showed COVID infiltrates in 25 percent of her lungs.

“I took it,” she told me. “Within 2 hours I was fine.” She tried the stairs again. No problem.

There are many stories like Jarrett’s. You won’t find them in the press or on Wikipedia, a common source of ivermectin information. Share them on Facebook and you might get barred from posting, as Jarrett’s doctor, Bruce Boros, recently was.

Control of the ivermectin message ostensibly is done under the guise of protecting public health. But the effort is instead doing the opposite, according to interviews with advocates, doctors and analysts.

“There’s a war on misinformation which is hurting good information,” said Dr. Pierre Kory, president of a group of doctors advocating the drug called Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, or FLCCC. “We have all the data showing massive mortality benefits of ivermectin. The less that’s being known about it, the more deaths are resulting.”

Where It Began

The effort to manage COVID treatment information has its roots, in part, in a sad chapter in American science and journalism: The Trump endorsement last spring of hydroxychloroquine. In an instant, early treatment was turned into a right-wing myth of interest only to Fox News. The rest of the press was merciless in repeating assertions that a reliable pharmaceutical workhorse used for several diseases was dangerous for COVID. Multiple studies have since refuted that and shown effectiveness in early illness, something most people do not know.

Dr. Mobeen Syed was among the first last March to explore HCQ’s potential in a YouTube video that went viral and landed him in a love-it/hate-it, right/left firestorm. “I started getting so many threats,” he said, prompting him to take the piece down himself.

After that, however, YouTube itself decided what the 250,000 subscribers to Drbeen Medical Lectures should see, removing videos willy-nilly, it seemed, on Vitamin D, remdesivir and, what others said was frequently censored, ivermectin.

Among other examples of this new censorship trend:

  • On Jan. 31, Facebook removed a page called Ivermectin for MDs Team, with 10,200 members from more than 100 countries. The last straw was a post on the Slovak Ministry of Health’s decision to allow use of ivermectin, which Facebook censors “believe is harmful to physical integrity,” the administrator wrote. Facebook also ruled that news of ivermectin approval by a southern state in Brazil violated its standards. Put another way, the social media giant did not like two independent government decisions and thought it knew better.
  • On Jan. 12, Twitter ruled a tweet by the Brazilian Ministry of Health — 1.2 million followers — was “spreading misleading and potentially harmful information.” Why? It urged people with COVID symptoms to “go to a Health Unit and request early treatment.”
  • More egregious, YouTube recently expunged two videos posted by a U.S. Senate committee on Dr. Kory’s ivermectin testimony. Further, it purged a video in which a scientist discussed his review of ivermectin as part of a project for a World Health Organization-hosted agency called Unitaid. YouTube even removed a video on its censorship of ivermectin.

In a hint at how vast the censorship is, Facebook asserted proudly in a Feb. 8 website post that it had “removed more than 12 million pieces of content on Facebook and Instagram containing misinformation that could lead to imminent physical harm.” Seven of my posts, on an article I wrote with multiple links to the science of ivermectin, were stricken with that label. (I got off on a 14-hour posting ban.)

My efforts were fruitless to get Facebook, Twitter or Google, which owns YouTube, to explain the methodology it uses to censor. In a public post, YouTube says it disallows information that “contradicts local health authorities” and the World Health Organization. Twitter maintains it culls “content that is demonstrably false or misleading and may lead to significant risk of harm.”

But who actually decides on a video or post? Are algorithms by technicians making the decisions or scientists and doctors? Should government guidelines be the ultimate yardstick when these are evolving — and sometimes wrong?

At the outset of COVID, officials actually advised against wearing masks and treating COVID with corticosteroids; both are common practices now that are saving lives.

Moreover, government decisions in a previous plague show how fallible they can be. In 1987, HIV-AIDS activists implored Dr. Anthony Fauci to endorse the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent a virulent AIDS-related pneumonia. The government waited two years for more data, during which, Sean Strub recounts in his memoir, “Body Counts,” 17,000 people died.

What Fauci wanted then and wants today is a bigger, better, well-designed study – even if the result of waiting for it is a higher death toll.

Steve Kirsch, a California entrepreneur, has funded research on an anti-depressant-turned-anti-COVID treatment called fluvoxamine that holds huge promise for eliminating COVID early. As with ivermectin, the drug is meeting resistance.

In a Feb. 26 article in Quora, Kirsch argued that the bar for acceptance of already approved drugs must be lowered, given their known safety and efficacy. “We have evidence-based treatments today that have a high probability to significantly reduce the hospitalization and death…with virtually no incremental risk,” he wrote. “It thus is wrong, and an unnecessary loss of life, to ‘wait for more data.’” He called fluvoxamine and ivermectin the two most promising drugs for early COVID treatment.

Big Brother at Work

On Dec. 27, Twitter suspended an account called @CovidAnalysis, which had been followed by nearly 7,000 people. The account, run by anonymous scientists, routinely tweeted on COVID treatment research, and continues to summarize and analyze its implications on its website. I’m not alone in relying on its informed interpretation, which is at times guarded and critical.

Twitter provided no warning before exorcising the account and hasn’t answered the group’s request for an explanation since. Commented one follower, @c19d3k2, “I really have to wonder how close to #1984 we have edged by now.”

Other accounts have also been purged, including that of a prominent and early hydroxychloroquine supporter, Dr. Zev Zelenko, who had more than 150,000 followers.

Put aside for a minute the implications of efforts to control what Americans and citizens around the world know – about anything. Not too long ago, such control was unthinkable.

Now consider that ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug that is on the WHO list of Essential Medicines. Among more than three dozen trials are 19 peer-reviewed studies and 21 randomized controlled trials. They show ivermectin works at various stages against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It stopped infection cold in healthcare workers in three Argentinian studies and one involving 4,000 people in India. It shut down early illness in studies from Pakistan and Bangladesh. It kept people alive in Egypt and in a study in Broward County, Florida.

Doctors largely don’t know this. Nor does the general public.

I found too many examples of early treatment censorship to list them all here, including the purging of a 4,000-member Facebook group called COVEXIT.com that often discusses hydroychloroquine, and removal of a popular video by Dr. Christy Risinger imploring regulators to consider ivermectin science. Nonetheless, the blackout surely isn’t complete. There is still plenty of ivermectin information on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

But the censor’s knife, the image of the drug as a right-wing construct, and the resistance of the media to report most anything on early treatments have all taken a toll. Ivermectin, it seems, is unacceptable in public discussion of early COVID treatment.

Here’s how this plays out: Three press reports explored the myriad factors driving down COVID in India — on NPR, the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. Yet each conspicuously made no mention of treatment, despite India’s widespread use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which surely deserved discussion.

I asked a widely published science writer, Esther Landuis, her thoughts on this: “In general it seems that the over politicized hydroxychloroquine debacle has muddied the waters for mainstream science magazines,” she told me. “Many outlets are afraid to be wrong about another repurposed drug; they are waiting for definitive data from a Phase 3 RCT (randomized controlled trial) with thousands of patients.”

The Upshot of Silencing

Ivermectin research shows the drug is most effective in preventing and quelling early infection – uses that would keep people out of hospitals and prevent long-haul symptoms. Yet ivermectin censorship robs patients of treatment with a safe drug that could be used off label and with informed consent. Many drugs are used this way, particularly in ICUs, where patients may be on a dozen medications in hopes that something works.

But ask for ivermectin for a family member, and you’ll likely be told, as one family member of a patient was, “We don’t use that here.” As a consequence, families of hospitalized patients sometimes go to great lengths to get it.

The family of a Texas man, 67, plotted to smuggle ivermectin to him in food then had lawyer intervene to secure the drug. Two New York state families got court orders to allow women, 80 and 65 years old, to be given ivermectin – but only prescribed by their personal physicians. When Dr. Erica Espinosa thought she would lose her husband – also a physician — to COVID-19, she arranged to fly him to a Houston hospital (six air ambulance companies declined) because it uses a protocol that includes ivermectin. Few hospitals do.

In those four cases, all but the Texas man rallied after getting ivermectin, and his treatment delay surely did not help. His death on Feb. 5 devastated his family; he left a wife of 40 years, two sons and daughters-in-law, and six grandchildren.

Dr. Bruce Boros, Cheryl Jarrett’s doctor and the owner of three urgent care centers in the Florida Keys, recently served time in what he and others call “Facebook Jail,” having run afoul of ivermectin censors. That’s small potatoes to Boros, however, who treated one hospitalized patient, Kyle Carter, by having ivermectin delivered to his bedside and directing him by phone on how much to take. (The hospital said it didn’t have the drug and then delayed giving it while Carter struggled to breathe.)

“Within 12 hours,” Carter told me, “I was feeling pretty fantastic. I knew that something had changed.” He still doesn’t know if the hospital was aware he’d taken ivermectin.

Two hundred patients later, Boros says this: “If your doctor doesn’t give this to you, get another doctor.”

If only it were that easy.

***Mary Beth Pfeiffer is an investigative journalist and the author of two books. Her website: www.thefirstepidemic.com.

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s and not necessarily those of TrialSite News LLC.

Explore Further:

Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru: 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p=.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted

Tags , , ,
Categories censorship, corruption, information operations, politics, propaganda, science, survival, Uncategorized

Srpsko rešenje za Kosovo

February 26, 2021 //
0

Read in English

Srpsko rešenje za Kosovo (predloženi nacrt)

Predsednik Srbije predlaže, a premijerka pokreće sledeća pojedinačna zakonodavna akta upravo ovim redosledom:

1) Srpska pokrajina Kosovo podeljena je od strane nacionalnog zakonodavstva Srbije, kako bi izvršila uklanjanje regiona Mitrovice sa većinskim etničkim srpskim stanovništvom iz pokrajine Kosovo, gde Mitrovica postaje sopstveni administrativni okrug pridružen Šumadiji i zapadnoj Srbiji.

2) Jug srpske pokrajine Kosovo, regija Metohije, uključujući sve granične / susedne etnički većinski srpske teritorije (uključujući one nepravoslavne manjine koje se tradicionalno identifikuju kao Srbi), postaće Autonomna srpska eksklava Metohija i Stara Srbija.

3) Srbija priznaje „Pravo na samoopredeljenje naroda“ Republike Srpske kao pravo na pridruživanje Srbiji, posebno onako kako je predviđeno temeljnim zakonom (preambulama) relevantnih Multilateralnih ugovora Ujedinjenih nacija.

4) Rezolucija: kada ovo prethodno podrže Evropska unija, Berlin i druge zainteresovane strane u skladu sa međunarodnim pravom, i dodatno, kada bude funkcionalno ispoštovano od strane de facto vlade u Prištini, Ustav Srbije će biti izmenjen tako da prizna nezavisno Kosovo.

 

Srbija/Serbia

*

© 2021 Ronald Tomas Vest (Ronald Thomas West)

 

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Tags , , ,
Categories Uncategorized

mRNA: “It’s Gene Therapy, Not a Vaccine”

February 24, 2021 //
0

Čitajte na srpskom

Part of the ‘Covid Scientific Counter-Narratives’ series at this blog. The following interview, with Dr David Martin PhD, is consistent with the several other counter-narratives by scientists in the Covid 19 series.

*

Interview @ https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/

Archived @ https://archive.li/71A7x & @ https://archive.li/1sYyp

Dr. David Martin, founder and chairman of M-CAM Inc, challenges our presuppositions about the new mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. Quoting the pharmaceutical companies themselves, David suggests that these are not vaccines, but, in actuality, gene therapy. He explains what the vaccines may do to us, what they are promising they can do for us, and how to distinguish the difference.

The below transcript is the Hilda Gore interview with Dr. David Martin.

HG: I have friends who’ve gotten one of the new COVID-19 vaccines and you do too. These are the fastest developed vaccines in all of our medical history and many people are lining up to get them as soon as possible. What are they made of? What would they do to us? Why are they being promoted and by whom? This is episode 292 and our guest is Dr. David Martin. He received his Undergrad degree from Goshen College, Master’s of Science from Ball State University and Doctorate from the University of Virginia. He is an innovator, a professor, and a man with an extensive resume of accomplishments.

With David, we focused on the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. He goes over the major issues surrounding them. He reviews the mRNA technology and explains how it is gene therapy, not a vaccine and our usual understanding of the word. He reviews the problems with the PCR tests and even helps us understand our broader state of emergency. Finally, he explains how fear on a subconscious level can make us resist the truth.

Welcome to the show, David.

DM: Thank you. It’s lovely to be here.

HG: I have a friend that works in the school system. She got a letter suggesting that she’s an essential worker and that she needs to get this one of these new vaccines being developed against this COVID virus. What should she know before she goes for it?

DM: Let’s start with your opening sentence. None of the words in the order that you use exist in reality. Let’s unpack that. First of all, there is no vaccine that is in development or contemplated that is a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That doesn’t exist. That hasn’t been developed. It isn’t even, in 2021, in contemplation. It’s one of the unfortunate things about what’s going on in the propaganda war, which is in February, the World Health Organization made it abundantly clear that SARS-CoV-2 or the virus and COVID-19, which is a series of clinical presentations of illness were two distinct things.

HG: You’re making an interesting distinction. I have heard that SARS-CoV-2 is “the virus” and that COVID-19 is the disease. Is that what you’re saying?

DM: COVID 19 is not a disease. It is a series of clinical symptoms. It is a giant umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases. The problem that we have is that in February, the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between the two of these things. One is a virus, in their definition and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The illusion in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-19. The problem with that definition and with the expectation is that the majority of people who test positive using the RT-PCR method for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2 are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus causes a disease fell apart. That’s the reason why they invented the term asymptomatic carrier.

HG: In other words, I might get a positive result from this PCR test and the reason I’m not asymptomatic, what’s happening is I’m not sick at all. They’ve made a false assumption that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19.

DM: That’s never been the case, never has been the case and never will be the case. There is a causal statement that is made in the media where, for example, Johns Hopkins or the COVID tracker platform or any of these things has intentionally misled the people. There are not 5,000 new cases in Virginia. There potentially may be several thousand positive PCR tests but most of the people who have a positive test will never have a single symptom. Most of the people who have symptoms do not have positive tests.

HG: I know some individuals who said that thing. They were like, “I was feeling sick and I got a negative test. My sister-in-law, who was feeling great, got a positive test.”

DM: It will always be the case. The causal link that the media, the CDC made and the COVID tracker, which is the collaboration between the Bloomberg Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Zuckerberg Foundation and others, the official numbers that we get traped across the screens every morning of our computers in our televisions, those numbers are willfully lying. They have been willfully lying since the inception of this. There is not a causal link between these things that have never been established. It has never even been close to established. We have a situation where the illusion of the problem is that people say, “I don’t want to get COVID-19.” What they mean is they don’t want to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not related to each other.

A viral infection hasn’t been documented in the majority of what is called cases. There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. That’s the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination, which as you well know when somebody says the word vaccination, the public understanding is that you are being treated with an attenuated or alive virus or a fragment of an attenuated and that the treatment is meant to keep you from getting an infection and it is meant to keep you from transmitting the infection that vaccine in the common definition of a vaccine is meant to do.

The problem is that in the case of Moderna and Pfizer, this is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy. It’s a chemotherapy agent that is gene therapy. It is not a vaccine. What is this doing? It’s sending a strand of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen. It’s a toxin inside of human beings. This is not only not keeping you from getting sick, it’s making your body produce the thing that makes you sick.

HG: In that sense, it does sound like a vaccine?

DM: No, not at all because a vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. It’s not supposed to trigger you to make a toxin.

HG: That’s how this differs.

DM: It’s not somewhat different. It’s not the same at all. This is a public manipulation of misrepresentation of clinical treatment. It’s not a vaccination. It’s not a prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.

HG: The way I’ve heard the companies put it is this is to teach your body to fight this virus when it comes around. That’s how they’re presenting it.

DM: Their clinical trial didn’t include any of that as even a possibility within the clinical trial. The clinical trial did not measure the presence or absence of a virus or a virus fragment. The clinical trial did not measure the possibility of transmission suppression, the clinical trial didn’t measure any of those things. This is a case of misrepresentation of technology and it’s done exclusively so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination.

HG: What you’re saying is different from what most of us have heard in the mainstream news and even from the press releases from big companies.

DM: That’s because people aren’t reading the actual clinical trials. If you read the clinical trials, nothing that I’m saying is even remotely different. As a matter of fact, the companies themselves have said what I’m saying. They said, they could not test for the existence or absence of the virus and they could not test for the transmissivity because they said it would be impractical. The companies themselves have admitted to every single thing I’m saying but they are using the public manipulation of the word vaccine to co-opt the public into believing they’re getting a thing, which they are not getting. This is not going to stop you from getting Coronavirus. It’s not going to stop you from getting sick. In fact, on the contrary, it will make you sick far more often than the virus itself.

HG: How can you say that so definitively?

DM: Because the data is nothing but that, for people receiving by the time they got the second shot, 80% of people had one or more clinical presentations of COVID-19, 80% of people who have an infection according to RT-PCR have no symptoms at all.

HG: People are getting it more from the “vaccine?”

DM: Yes. You will get COVID-19 symptoms from getting the gene therapy passed off as a vaccine. You will get COVID symptoms from that 80% of the time. If you’re exposed to SARS-CoV-2 according to RT-PCR, 80% of the time, you will have no symptoms at all.

HG: What is the purpose of getting this vaccine or this gene manipulation as you call it?

DM: It’s a gene therapy technology. That’s Moderna’s own definition. Let’s stick with what they say they are. The benefit is non-existent. A human being is going to be potentially exposed to unclassified, both short-term and long-term risks of altering their RNA and DNA from exposure to this gene therapy. This is important to understand, there is no clinical benefit except that in certain instances of CoV infection and/or COVID-19 exposure, there were a few. By that, I mean less than a few hundred out of nearly 40,000 in the clinical trial. A few hundred people had a few days less severe symptoms with the gene therapy when compared to the other control group. Even in that comparison, if you look at the methodology that’s in the published papers for the clinical trials, they play games with the data because what they’re doing is, they’re separating reactivity, meaning the way in which a person responds to being exposed to the gene therapy, they separate out adverse events from actual COVID symptoms.

The problem is that COVID symptoms include things like fever, body ache, muscle pain, muscle weakness and things like that. They got rid of a lot of what would have been considered to be COVID symptoms by calling them adverse events. If you pull that data out and you say, “Compare the population that got the gene therapy with the population that didn’t get the gene therapy.” The population that got the gene therapy had way more illness, including COVID-19 symptoms, than the population that didn’t get the gene therapy but because they classified an enormous number of things as adverse events, they technically wiggled themselves into what was this ridiculous 90% plus effectiveness. Effectiveness was not effective in blocking illness. It was effective in allegedly shortening the duration of symptoms.

HG: People are afraid that they are ready to believe what they want to believe and holding onto that one bit of information that you shared, that the likelihood with the flu vaccine, “At least it will tamp down my symptoms and limit the duration of my illness.” They held onto that one bit of information that was data manipulation, as you’re saying and they’re holding out hope that this will be their saving grace to help them avoid COVID-19.

DM: Nothing about this will avoid COVID-19 and nothing about this will avoid SARS-CoV-2.

HG: We’ve been talking mostly about the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine that is gene therapy. Is there another one in the works or getting to the market that is not using gene therapy?

DM: The AstraZeneca Oxford trial is using a viral fragment. It is more along the technological lines of what you and I might consider historically, to be a vaccine. The AstraZeneca Oxford trial has been an interesting one to watch because they have a methodology problem that is quite challenging in terms of trying to fool data and understand what’s happening either on the safety or efficacy side. The reason is simple, that in certain instances, the AstraZeneca Oxford trial has not used a saline control group. They’ve used another vaccine as the control. In other words, they’ve stacked the deck. They’re making it look like they are somehow neutral compared to another vaccination in several of their data collection efforts.

As a result of that, we have both a methodology problem, which by the way, has been criticized by a number of clinical scientists. The bigger problem is that they’re still not measuring viral susceptibility and viral transmission. Those are the two legs of the stool that is required for anyone to say that they are vaccinating a population for public health reasons. There is no means by which. This is a simple thing to wrap your head around. If I said, “Everybody needs to take chemotherapy for cancer they might get.”

HG: People would laugh in your face.

DM: That’s exactly what is happening. This is not prophylactic. This is not helping us. We’re being told to take a treatment for a disease we don’t have and most likely will not have. We’re being told that using careful marketing manipulation and propaganda, calling these things vaccines for public health.

HG: Historically vaccines, we’ve taken them for that reason. “I don’t have the measles. I don’t want to get the measles, so I’m going to get this measles shot.” We’ve been primed to accept that approached.

DM: That’s the narrative everybody expects.

HG: Why don’t you expect that though? What’s made you dive deep?

DM: That’s not what’s being measured. That’s not what’s being done and that’s not what this technology is about. mRNA is not a vaccination. It’s a gene therapy that was originally developed for cancer treatment. That’s why I’m using the chemotherapy analogy. This is not a vaccination.

HG: I have colleagues, I’m sure you do too, friends and acquaintances who are going for it. What can we tell these people or share with them that might wake them up?

DM: That’s a complex issue and I have chosen a long time ago to not engage in the energy of this waking sleeping metaphor because the fact of the matter is if people are conditioned to react to fear, this is reflexive and it’s not conscious. If we examine our behavior and what we do is engage in self-harm because we are convinced that somehow or another, there’s a worse future ahead of us, that’s something that I don’t have an ability to say facts are going ever to overcome. I have yet to meet in my life someone who allowed a fact to overwhelm a belief. Once you’ve adopted a belief, facts are not welcome because what they do is, they not only indict your belief but they indict the energy that you hold that says, “I have to believe what I’m told.”

The minute you try to engage with facts, all you do is trigger conflict. What I do is I try to take the complex science and the complex reporting, and I try to make it accessible and easily understood. The goal is that in certain instances, people will go, “I can’t even believe that what he said was true.” The cool thing is you don’t have to believe what I’m saying is true because I don’t value belief. I value the objective reality of facts. It turns out that in this particular case, it is simple and straightforward to say to any person in Moderna’s own SEC filings, they make it abundantly clear that their technology is a gene therapy technology. In their clinical trial, they’ve made it abundantly clear that they could not measure the presence or absence of the virus and they could not measure the presence or the absence of the transmission of the virus. Every single thing that they represented to be doing that preys on the public understanding of what vaccination is, they explicitly said, “They’re not doing that.”

HG: You have been careful to lay out the facts to me and the audience and we’re thankful. I want to ask you on a more personal note, would you even take this PCR test if you had to for travel? I’m getting all kinds of emails and people reaching out to me and I’m not even talking about the vaccine or the gene therapy technology but certain things are being required to participate in life.

DM: I’m actively involved with many of the significant pieces of litigation that are going on to try to unmask the conspiracy that is driving both the PCR, as well as the medical countermeasure interventions. I’m at the vanguard with a few other souls who are fighting for the rights of citizens to make decisions informed by facts, not informed by propaganda. The fact of the matter is the PCR test has never been approved as a diagnostic. It is not diagnostic. There’s nothing about taking a PCR test that does anything other than reinforce a propaganda narrative. It doesn’t tell you anything.

The reason why we’re not doing influenza testing is that we don’t want to admit the fact that the majority of people who are in hospital, who are sick and who are dying are experiencing exactly the same thing that’s happened every year, which is influenza-like, flu-like and pneumonia-like illness. In many cases, when someone has immune compromise or other comorbidities leads to fatalities. It’s a sad reality that that happens but it is part of the human experience that it happens. The fact is that a PCR test is not going to make or not make a confirmed diagnosis of anything because PCR tests cannot confirm a diagnosis.

HG: I’ve interviewed Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andy Kaufman, and they say the same thing. The person who came up with or developed the PCR test says that it’s not to be used to diagnose anything.

DM: So does the FDA so does everybody else. The only reason we are using PCR tests is that governors and the Department of Health and Human Services are maintaining a state of emergency. The second that that state of emergency is lifted in any state or in the country, the PCR test won’t be allowed to be used. We’re maintaining a state of emergency so that manufacturers can keep selling a thing that would never be approved if it was subject to a clinical trial. It goes for what’s being called vaccines too. The gene therapy that Moderna and Pfizer are doing, both of those would be suspended immediately if the state of emergency got lifted. People don’t understand that if you lift the state of emergency, the whole house of cards falls.

HG: That is something else that you and your team are advocating for?

DM: It’s because the emergency use authorization falls with the state of emergency.

HG: Is this one reason, do you think that they have cast aspersions on hydroxychloroquine or any other protocols that could possibly treat the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2?

DM: There’s no question. If you look historically, for many years, Dr. Anthony Fauci at NIAID has held his annual advisory committee meeting. Every year he laments the fact that they’re trying to build this universal influenza vaccine, which he refers to using as an infant in-print vaccine. They’ve been trying to do this for years and it hasn’t worked. This happens to be an opportunity for Anthony Fauci to get what he has not been able to get through legal means, which is he wants to get to a place where he forces a vaccine on a population. He’s manipulating this situation to force a vaccine on a population. The fact of the matter is he forgot that if he’s going to force a vaccine on a population, it should at least be a vaccine.

HG: What would his motives be for that?

DM: Always has been financial. There are billions of dollars at stake and NIAID is essentially the incubator for the pharmaceutical industry. He’s serving the paymasters that have let him manage $191 billion in his career at NIAID.

HG: There are lots to consider here. You’ve given us a lot of food for thought. We want to have another conversation with you again but let’s say I’m an individual that was reading all these facts and I’ve been persuaded. I do not want to get this gene therapy technology. I don’t want even to get the AstraZeneca vaccine. I don’t want to get any of this but I’m under pressure either because of my job or for travel purposes to do so, what would you advise me to do?

DM: I can’t advise a person at all. That’s not my role but what I can tell you is that this is a decision that any human being is going to ultimately have to make based on whether or not they choose to live or they choose to be enslaved. This is like any point in history where you have to make decisions that are based on what is moral and ethical and right with respect to your own sense of responsibility and accountability. The fact of the matter is like wearing a seat belt, like doing a whole bunch of other things, your choice to engage in an activity is ultimately going to be a decision that you have to live with.

I will not touch a thing and I will not allow my body to be invaded with a thing that is been developed in an unethical and illegal way. I am not going to let anybody have the opportunity to manipulate my genetic code. It’s not going to happen. If that means that it comes at a cost of a particular employer or a particular relationship or whatever else, my life happens to be worth more than that. We’ve been conditioned to fall into this trap, which is, “We might not be able to get on a plane.” So, drive.

HG: I thought about that. I’m going to start taking a boat.

DM: I’m not going to let my future and my well-being be enslaved to a commercial interest that is trying to extort or blackmail me into a thing.

HG: That does sound like living. That does sound like freedom as opposed to slavery. I appreciate that. I think that’s what we’re about to hear at the foundation. We want people to live their best lives to take responsibility for their own health and look to ways to nurture it that may not be the most modern or the most profitable for health companies but will be best for them. Let me wrap up by asking you the question I often pose at the end. If the reader could do one thing to improve or sustain their health, what would you recommend that they do?

DM: Pick a lifestyle modification first and foremost and pick it with someone else. Begin exercising, engage in a more wholesome way of engaging with the food you consume. Anything that involves bringing together the sense of wellbeing, which involves fellowship, nutrition, vitality and empowering you to become a person who not only has a conceptual idea of what health is but has a lived experience of it. The more you have the lived experience of health, the less you can be told you’re unwell when you’re perfectly fine.

HG: Thank you so much for your time, David. This has been a great conversation.

DM: You are most welcome. Take care.

…

Related:

Covid: Scientific Counter-Narratives

updated 6 February 2022

One to watch: Growing Indisputable Evidence; Uttar Pradesh, India. 200 Million People. Down to 17 New Covid Cases daily. 14 Straight Weeks of Downward Trend in Covid Infections. Just Over 400 Total Active Infections. What’s the Other Story Here? Ivermectin is Responsible. Update: Uttar Pradesh now at 0.01% positivity rate, 33 districts covid free. 2nd update: WHO is aware but keeps quiet on Uttar Pradesh success story.

Covid scientific counter-narratives includes links to information provided by front-line doctors and top scientific researchers from universities and other institutions that are suppressed by algorithms at google search and have been censored at Facebook, Twitter, Youtube & LinkedIn.  If it appears any of the links have been scrubbed from the net, copy the link location (control + click with a macbook on any link below) and enter it into the search-bar at https://archive.li/ (where the articles are backed up.) This list is updated more or less weekly. The first five articles are my own, most of the rest (with a few exceptions) are either external links or journalism republished at ronaldthomaswest.com.

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part one

Transcendent Corruption & Corona Virus part two

When Western Culture Turned to Cannibalism

Covid, mRNA & Mad Scientists

The Flip: Russian Propaganda Technique

…

Holocaust Survivor on Covid Policy: “Never Again is Now”

Study: Lockdowns Don’t Stop Covid, Destroy Social Fabric

Damning Leaked Pfizer Documents

British Columbia 1/2 of Covid Hospitalizations are not Covid

Underlying ‘pandemic’ Motivation (op-ed)

UK Covid Death Statistic Inflated to a Factor of 10 (youtube)

Sole Natural Immunity Missing From “Super-Immunity Study”

Covid in Europe Before Discovery in China

Inventor of mRNA Banned by Twitter

Interview With Inventor of mRNA

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Japan

USA: Corrupt Federal Covid Statistics

Danish Doctors Reject Merck Pill for Covid: “flimsy documentation”

Omicron is Covid Morphed Into Normal Flu

Big Pharma’s $1,000 a Second Covid Rake-in Adds Another EUA

Netherlands Doctors Break Law & Prescribe Ivermectin (Dutch)

The Gates-Fauci Multi-Billion Vaccine Empire

University School of Medicine: Natural Immunity is Good For Life

Another Study: mRNA = 150,000 Dead Americans in Six Months

mRNA Vaccines Can Make Spike Proteins “Forever” in Kids

New Measures? Omicron hosptalizations “low”

Vaccine: Dissident Scientist Assassinated

Yale Epidemiologist: Covid “Manufactured” Pandemic of Fear

Covid in Tolkien’s Shire (Op-Ed)

Court Ordered Ivermectin Saves Hospitalized “Dying Patient”

South Africa: Omicrom Cases “Mild”

German Government Raking in Billions on Pfizer/BioNTech

Big Pharma Collecting $1,000 per Second on Covid

USA to Court: Hide Pfizer Data For 50+ Years

Study of Studies: Masks Don’t Work

USA Buys Ten Million EUA Pfizer Pills ($529 per pill)

Mercola: ‘Boosters for Life’

Vaccinated 9 x More Likely to Be Hospitalized

More on mRNA is “gene therapy” & Vaccine Deaths

USA: Hospitals Reap Covid Bounties

Attorney RFK Jr: Covid Dictatorial Decrees

Germany: Higher Vax Rate = Higher Excess Mortality (German)

England Official Statistic: More Covid in Vaccinated

Top Experts: Don’t Vaccinate The Kids

Biden’s ‘inform on thy neighbor’ Vaccine STASI

Infants Are The New Vaccine Lab Rats

Viral Vaccine Immune Escape

20 Studies: Vaccine Mandates Not Based on Science

Thailand Approves Herbal Treatment for Mild Covid

UK: When Official Data Doesn’t Match Official Propaganda, Grovel

Expert Discussion on Vaccine Mandates vs Vaccine Injuries (youtube)

Natural Immunity vs Vaccinated: CDC Study Drops The Ball

OSHA To Employers: Don’t Bother Reporting Adverse Events

Dr of Pediatric Neurosurgery: Child Vaccination “Giant Experiment”

Study: mRNA Vaccination = 80% Miscarriage In 1st 20 Weeks (pdf)

Moderna CEO “No Moral Compass”

Johnson & Johnson Vaccine = 3.5 x Increase In Blood Clots

Covid Data Integrity Issues At Pfizer 

EU Statistic: Vaccine Deaths Now At 28,000 (1/2 of Europe)

Problems Emerging In Pfizer’s ‘Israel is Our Lab’ Experiment

Canceling Medical Professionals Raising Questions Ongoing

Vaccination Erasing Natural Immunity

FDA Presentation: Vaccination and Kids Deaths

Scotland Official Statistic: 85% of Covid Deaths Are Vaccinated

Singapore: High Vaccination Rate = High Covid Rate

Here It Is Again: Higher Vaccination % = Higher Covid Rates

NIH: Low Vitamin D Predicts Covid Infection

FDA & CDC Suppress Hospital’s 90% Vaccinated Covid Patients

Ivermectin: Rogan Takes On CNN’s Sanjay Gupta (Rogan Wins)

How Israel Became Pfizer’s Lab Experiment

Big Pharma Lap Dog: Ivermectin Works But Let’s Study it More

29 Studies: Natural Immunity is Superior to Vaccination

Amish Covid (herd immunity)

New Anti-Covid Drug = Profit Over Safety

How Covid Manipulation Made Moderna Fiscally Viable

Doctors Stepping Outside Official Narrative Risk License Loss

Merck Sells EUA Covid Pill at 40 Times Production Price

Vaccination Injuring Young Males At Unprecedented Level

Senator Rand Paul on the Covid Fraud (video & text)

Bad News for Gene Editing (peripheral relevance)

Lengthy Breakdown of the Covid History & Fraud

Vaccination of Kids “Against Established Science”

AMA Directs Doctors to Deceive (Mercola)

Covid Math Doesn’t Add Up

Croatia: No More Vaccinations

US Army Equates Anti-Vax With Satanism (threatens soldiers)

Social Distancing “Completely Made Up” (FDA official)

Labs Can’t Find Covid Virus in 1,500 Positive Tests

Anti-Ivermectin ‘Experts’ Conflicts of Interest

USA: Ivermectin Disinformation Source & Timeline

German Doctors: Stop The Panic Propaganda (in German)

FDA Expert: Vaccines May Kill More Than They Save

India Lawsuit vs WHO (youtube, 53 min)

In Australia, Flu is Covid

Covid in Geopolitics (Gorilla Radio)

“Constitutional Work Around” The USA Vaccine Mandate

More Heath Workers Quit Rather Than ‘get the jab’

RollingStone & Twitter Collude in Fake Ivermectin Story

Five Alarm Fire: Vaccine Replication of Spike Protein

Aussie Prison vs Russian Freedom (youtube, 52 min)

Scotland Statistic: Vaccines Kill More People Than Covid

FDA Rats Leave the Sinking Ship

Ivermectin & Joe Rogan

Innumerable False Covid Cases Officially Registered

On Indigenous Healers of Covid (Columbia, Pacific Coast)

UK Statistic: Less Than 1/3 of Covid Deaths in Unvaccinated

Vitamin D: Study Says Without It, Covid Patients Often Die

Faux FDA Pfizer Approval, EUA Still Applies (pdf)

21% of Covid in Vaccinated = 58% of all Covid Deaths

Corrupt Oxymoron in FDA/Pfizer Approval (pdf)

Statistical Fraud in the FDA/Pfizer Vaccine Approval

Links Collection to 30 Studies: Masks Don’t Work

Bill Gates Major Pfizer Shares-holder

Another Study: Ivermectin Works

Leading Expert: Mass Covid Vaccination “Historic Mistake”

Top Tokyo Medical Authority: Use Ivermectin

New Scientific Study re HCQ & Ivermectin: It Works

Does Pfizer Require Employee Vaccination? No.

Highly Qualified Virologist: Vaccines are Driving the Pandemic

Gibraltar: 99% Vaccinated, 2,500% Spike in Covid Cases 

Israel: Natural Immunity Far Stronger Than Vaccine Immunity

Study: Ivermectin Cut Intensive Care Deaths 38% (Spanish)

Another Study: Ivermectin Stops Covid

Survey: Over 1/2 of America’s Doctors Decline Vaccination

CDC Proposes ‘Covid Camps’ for the “Vulnerable”

Expert: Covid Propaganda Threat to Democracy (video, 44 min)

Natural Immunity in Unvacinnated/Recovered is STRONG

Each Covid Booster Multiplies Chance of Dying From Vaccine

Overview of Misconduct Alleged by Whistleblowers

EU: 20,500 Deaths, 1.9 Million Injuries from Vaccines (1/2 of Europe)

Anti-Body Dependent Enhancement in the Vaccinated (nasty stuff)

2020: 1.6 BILLION Masks in the Ocean, 450 Years to Decompose

Over 100,000 Vaccinated Get Covid, CDC Quit Counting at 10,000

Vaccinated Dropping Dead in Scotland: Official Statistics

Delta Variant in India: No Worse Than a Common Cold

CDC Notice: PCR Test Goes to Trash (see Gates & Soros)

Gates & Soros to Buy Covid Testing Company

Forensic Analysis: 9,000 Vaccine Deaths Should be 45,000

PCR False Positives Big Problem in Australia

USA New Trend: More Deaths From Vaccine Than Covid

UK New Trend: More Cases in Vaccinated Than Unvaccinated

Pfizer Ex-VP: “Fact-Checkers Pack of Lies”

Dr Martin’s Fauci/Covid Criminal Dossier (pdf 205 pages)

PCR Tests Accuracy Debunked (again)

EUA (experimental) Vaccines Violate Nuremberg Ethics 

Canada Fires Another Top Doctor for Raising Questions

Pfizer Manipulated Vaccine Protocols for Children

USA Senator: Suppression of Vaccine Deaths in Media

Politics of Ivermectin in Indonesia

18-39? AstraZeneca Twice as Likely to Kill You as Covid

Fear Mongers vs Delta Variant kills 0.08% of Unvaccinated

Countless Holes in the Official Covid Narrative (the long read)

Lisbon court: 0.9% (152) covid deaths, not the 17,000 claimed (pdf)

1.5 Million Vaccine Injuries, 15,000+ Deaths in EU (1/2 of Europe)

Top Medical Professor Fired for Questioning Vaccinating Children

Inventor of mRNA censored at Youtube for saying “ivermectin”

Moderna mRNA Vaccine Developed Before Covid Outbreak

Asymptomatic Covid Spread Alarm Was False

Science Breakthrough: How Ivermectin Works on Covid

PhD in Immunology censored at Youtube

India Lawsuit Against WHO Chief Scientist (pdf)

India Bar Association Sues WHO Chief Scientist

Corrupt WHO Pushes Back on Ivermectin in India

India Court Over-rules WHO, Allows Ivermectin

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Mexico City

Pfizer’s Own Research Reveals mRNA Vaccine deadly

Suppressing Ivermectin Has Killed 1/2 Million (to May 2021)

John Hopkins Professor: 1/2 of Americans are immune

The Drug That Cracked Covid (pdf file)

CDC Data 12,000% Increase in Deaths With EUA Vaccines

Another 160 Experts Say Stop the Experimental Jabs

Ivermectin Crushes Covid in Delhi

How Corruption Suppresses Ivermectin

Paper by 57 Scientists: Stop EUA Vaccinating Now

Bill Gates Protects Big Pharma Profits on Covid Vaccines

More on mRNA Experimental Vaccine

Top Yale University Researcher: Ivermectin Kills Covid

Covid vs Flu: Where is the Grim Reaper’s Scythe in 2020-2021?

Covid: Suppression of Scientific Counter-Narratives

mRNA: “It’s Gene Therapy, Not A Vaccine” David Martin, PhD

We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April by Dr Marty Makary (Johns Hopkins)

Treat Your Own Covid by John Day MD

Beating covid with generic drugs

The Great Barrington Declaration on covid

Fear is the Killer on covid

PCR False Positives (Study: Ten Fatal Flaws)

Propaganda & Corona Virus

*

Covid 19

*

A former Sergeant of Operations and Intelligence for Special Forces, Ronald Thomas West is a retired investigator (living in exile) whose work focus had been anti-corruption. Ronald had lived over thirty years in close association with Blackfeet Indians (those who still speak their language), and is published in international law as a layman: The Right of Self- Determination of Peoples and It’s Application to Indigenous People in The USA or The Mueller-Wilson Report, co-authored with Dr Mark D Cole. Ronald has been adjunct professor of American Constitutional Law at Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (for English credit, summer semester 2008.) Ronald’s formal educational background (no degree) is social psychology. His therapeutic device is satire.

Contact: penucquemspeaks@googlemail.com

“Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with the good” -Mahatma Ghandi

Tags , , , , , , , ,
Categories corruption, counter intelligence, crime, information operations, politics, propaganda, psychology, social responsibility, State Terror, survival, treason, Uncategorized

Makrokosmička zapadna propaganda za pranje geopolitičkih zločina

February 10, 2021 //
0

Read in English

Ovaj esej se odnosi na pitanje Kosova; gde su zapadne države (NATO i EU) odredile da Srbija nije podobna da upravlja manjinom (etničkim Albancima) na svojoj (srpskoj) teritoriji, već sada navodno (od strane Zapada) nezavisno Kosovo je podobno da upravlja manjinom (etničkih Srba).

Čini se da je EU zauzela stav „zanemarimo nepovoljnu činjenicu“ da su doskorašnji kosovski „lideri“ uhapšeni i isporučeni Međunarodnom tribunalu zbog zločina nad etničkim Srbima (uključujući i vađenje organa), a da i ne pominjemo ono što predstavlja puku retoriku (bez konkretne akcije ili izvršenja) koja se tiče repatrijacije 250.000 Srba proteranih sa Kosova u etničkom pogromu čišćenja, fabrikovanog od strane Albanaca, nakon NATO bombardovanja Srbije.

Što se tiče jedne prethodne repatrijacije EU, hrvatsko etničko čišćenje Srpske Krajine pokazuje nepošten stav EU; nema realnih očekivanja (i nikada ih nije ni bilo) od strane Evropske unije da će 200.000 Srba prognanih iz ove regije sa (nekada) većinski srpskim stanovništvom, biti dozvoljeno da se vrati u Hrvatsku i svoje domove. U međuvremenu, Hrvatska je primljena u Evropsku uniju.

Dakle, u kontekstu da Srbi nisu pouzdani da upravljaju etničkom manjinom Albanaca, ali Albanci jesu pouzdani da upravljaju manjinom Srba, EU de facto prihvata (stvarni ishodi, a ne politički nastup) upravo onu vrstu etničkog čišćenja koje je NATO bombardovanje trebalo da zaustavi?

NATO je „upravo dozvolio“ da se dogodi još jedan masovni pogrom kada su stekli kontrolu nad Kosovom? Ha. Možda ta albanska „većina“ nije bila statistički dovoljno velika da bi opravdala nezavisno Kosovo (i obezbedila sada tobože „nezavisnom“ Kosovu „pravo“ da bude domaćin Kampu Bondstil).

Sada, u ovom zamršenim pritiscima proizvoljnih jurisdikcija, koje su Srbiji nametnuli EU, NATO i američka vojna okupacija južne pokrajine Kosovo u Srbiji (Kamp Bondstil), to bi trebalo da je dovoljno da slomi logistiku nečasne igre zapadnih demokratija.

„Kamp Bondstil je glavna baza vojske Sjedinjenih Država pod komandom KFOR-a na Kosovu. Smeštena u blizini Uroševca u istočnom delu Kosova, ova baza služi kao sedište NATO-a za KFOR-ovu Multinacionalnu borbenu grupu Istok.“

Poredak je zanimljiv, kao i nomenklatura. Američka vojska prvo figurira („glavna baza vojske Sjedinjenih Država“) „pod“ (pazite kako se odigrava ova obmana) komandom KFOR-a … služi kao sedište NATO-a za KFOR-ovu Multinacionalnu borbenu grupu… „ili na dešifrovanom vojnom“ orvelovskom jeziku, NATO pod američkom dominacijom (svaki „vrhovni saveznički komandant Evrope“ NATO-a bio je američki general tokom čitave istorije NATO-a) drži „borbenu grupu“ na Kosovu. Ovaj jezik je potpuno u suprotnosti sa „održavanjem mira.“ Ovde je važno napomenuti, bilo je to vreme kada je ova okupatorska snaga imala 50.000 ljudi i bila raspoređena širom Kosova, kosovskim etničkim Albancima je „nekako“ bilo dozvoljeno da potisnu 250.000 srpskih civila sa Kosova u pogromu koji se može definisati samo kao etničko čišćenje kršenjem međunarodnih konvencija o ljudskim pravima.

Ukratko, drugim rečima, misija KFOR-a osnovana da zaustavi borbe između srpske vojske i Oslobodilačke vojske Kosova, nakon povlačenja srpske vojske, KFOR je očigledno stao na stranu Oslobodilačke vojske Kosova i „stajao na straži“ dok je OVK (pobunjeničkoj vojsci) dozvoljeno da potisne 250.000 srpskih stanovnika iz domova u svojoj zemlji, događaj koji je srpska vojska sprečila pre nego što je NATO uspostavio kontrolu.

Sada, ovo prethodno se razvilo u NATO-ovu „vlast“ izvedenu iz Rezolucije UN 1244, čiji jezik nije u skladu sa istorijskom stvarnošću …

„Da se ​​reši teška humanitarna situacija na Kosovu, Savezna Republika Jugoslavija, i da se obezbedi siguran i slobodan povratak svih izbeglica i raseljenih lica svojim domovima“

…Uz napomenu da je Kosovo upisano u evidenciju UN-a kao teritorija koja pripada Srbiji (Jugoslavija je u to vreme bila zajednica Srbije i Crne Gore).

Ukratko, pod izgovorom „humanitarne intervencije“ putem Rezolucije UN-a koju NATO nikada nije nameravao da ispoštuje („videće se na delu“), ilegalna pobuna je geopolitičkom obmanom prerasla u odmetničku „državu“ kojom upravljaju OVK ratni zločinci koje obezbeđuje NATO.

„Transcendentna korupcija“ je vrednost koju sam dodelio stranama koje prihvataju „boju zakona“ (obloga legaliteta koja maskira korupciju) u kojoj je zakon stvoren da služi interesima autokrata (npr. Merkel), plutokrata (npr. Porodice Klinton i Bajden ), i oligarhije (npr. Evropska unija) i kada se uzmu svi zajedno ispada da vladaju pomoću najmoćnijih ličnosti korporativnih odbora (koji vuku konce) u modelu feudalizma 21. veka koji se manifestuje kao fašizam, ali je označen kao demokratija da bi se ublažila osećajnost seljaka (građana).

Sve ovo se nastavlja dalje na istorijskim činjenicama koje je zapadna propagandna mašina previdela; Većinsko srpsko stanovništvo istočnog pravoslavlja u regionu Srpske Krajine nedavno (Ratovi na Balkanu 90-ih) etnički je očišćeno od strane katoličke Hrvatske „Operacijom Oluja“ (nema veze što su Srbi postali baba roga za sve što je pošlo po zlu s raspadom Jugoslavije), kao i činjenica da su nametnute neprirodne etničke granice prema Republici Srpskoj, time osiguravši da u Bosni postoje stalne tenzije na granici sa Srbijom, i ne najmanje važno, preostaloj srpskoj većini na severu Kosova uskraćeno je pravo na samoopredeljenje da se pridruži Srbiji, osiguravajući neprekidni međuetnički sukob koji služi samo za slabljenje državnih institucija kontinuiranom radikalizacijom obe populacije, pravoslavnog hrišćanskog Srbina i albanskog muslimana. A onda imamo Metohiju ili verodostojni istorijski duhovni centar srpskog naroda u proteklih 1000 godina.

Mora se primetiti da, slično kao što su Sijuks Indijanci svoju kulturu zasnovali na duhovnom odnosu prema Crnim brdima Južne Dakote, iz kojih su proterani, odnos Srbije prema „Staroj Srbiji“ (Kosovu) malo se razlikuje; imperijalistička ambicija je videla da su Srbi u više navrata etnički očišćeni od strane Albanaca, prvo pod „pokroviteljstvom“ Osmanskih Turaka, koji su favorizovali islamsko stanovništvo, tada manjinu, a kasnije, Albance je, u daljem sprovođenju pogroma nad Srbima sa Kosova, podržala fašistička sila Osovine iz Drugog svetskog rata (slično hrvatskim ustaškim progonima Srba tokom rata), tako što su proterali još više srpskog stanovništva, pri čemu je završni udarac izveo komunizam pod Titom, koji je zabranio etničkim Srbima da se vrate u svoje domove na Kosovu nakon 1945. godine. Ovo je nasleđe, koje je NATO dalje sprovodio u ulozi „izvršitelja“ otimanja Kosova od Srbije. Kosovo je izvorna „Stara Srbija“ koja se i dalje smatra centrom srpskog kulturnog identiteta kroz (stalnu) monašku tradiciju pravoslavlja u regionu Metohije.

Zatim, u ovaj nered stupa poslednji narod (ako su uopšte imali bilo kakav osećaj stida) koji bi trebalo da posreduje u postojećim tenzijama, Nemci, posebno Angela Merkel, i, od nedavno, Ursula fon der Lajen, čiji je porodični rodoslov nalik na ko je ko od carskih ličnosti, koje ne mogu da pomognu u percepciji one Srbije čija su sećanja na nacističku okupaciju još uvek bolna.

„Posredovanje“ u aktuelnom sporu u kojoj kosovska kriminalna uprava (pod „zaštitom“ NATO-a) dozvoljava radikalnom vehabizmu da preobraća albansko stanovništvo i udalji ih od umerenijeg toka islama u kolevci pravoslavne srpske civilizacije, to što Evropa zahteva da Srbija prizna i posluje sa kriminalnim grupama ne može bolje promovisati rat civilizacija, čak i da je pokušala; može se pretpostaviti da je puka nesposobnost, proistekla iz ego-narcizma, iznedrila ovu okolnost danas. Ali možda je i više od toga, oslabljena Srbija sa veštačkim granicama je „lak plen“ sa mogućnošću uspostavljanja kontrole nad regionom, koji je kulturološki vezan za Rusiju, a koga je istorijski priželjkivala katolička direkcija u Rimu.

U mnogim geopolitičkim mahinacijama vršenim od strane Merkelove, fon der Lajenove, Trampa (i sada Bajdena), da ne pominjem srpske prodane duše Vučića i Brnabić koji „šene“ na zvižduk pištaljke, na stolu stoji pseće govno, koje se niko ne usuđuje da pomene: zlonamernost Zapadnog hrišćanstva prema Istočnom pravoslavlju, posebno slovenskom pravoslavlju. Smrad je u vazduhu.

„…imajući u vidu činjenicu da vladika Grigorije ima veoma snažan uticaj među episkopima, kontrolori javnog mnjenja su rešili da učine sve kako bi umanjili šanse da na Saboru bude izabran poglavar koji neće biti saradnik vlasti.

Zbog toga i obračun sa ovim episkopom, koji je u više navrata govorio šta misli o “Zlatnom dobu Srbije”, danima postaje sve oštriji i opasniji. Iako je povod bio intervju koji je dat pre gotovo mesec dana, činjenica da Grigorije ugrožava planove režima na dva fronta, više je nego dovoljan razlog da se duhovnik iz Hercegovine predstavi kao najveći neprijatelj Srbije i čovek koji “deli verni narod”.

A matrica je uvek ista – protivnik se prvo provlači kroz medijsko blato, da bi zatim sa nacionalnih frekvencija dvorske lude vlasti iznosile “nepoznate činjenice”, odnosno lažne podatke iz njegove biografije.

Ukoliko to ne slomi neprijatelja, onda se prelazi na snimanje spotova u kojima hrabri, nepoznati autori, dovode u pitanje ljudske osobine žrtve progona, što ujedno predstavlja i otvoreni poziv na linč. Kome to nije jasno, neka se podseti kako je prošao Oliver Ivanović.“

Na kraju, nešto malo bliže stvarnim razlozima koji stoje iza poziva da se atentat manifestuje:

„…organizatori hajke na nepodobnog episkopa su odlučili da iskoriste to što on ne deli viziju “napredne” Srbije i Crkve i da ga zbog toga obeleže kao izdajnika, stvorivši tako utisak da je patriotiski čin ukloniti (ubiti) takvu osobu.“ [1]

Laž srpske države (oligarhija Vučić) koja se tiče vladike Grigorija, koji je opozicija crkvi, je eruptivna; crkveni stav je uvek bio da Metohija jeste, i uvek će biti, Srbija. Utoliko što je „napredna“, „napretku“ Evropske unije (koju kontroliše Nemačka) je pomalo nedostajalo zahteva da evropska monokultura proizilazi iz socijalnih tenzija rođenih iz multikulturalizma. To je neprirodan proces, lišen duha zajednice, sekularno korumpiran u krajnjoj liniji i zasnovan na geopolitičkoj propagandnoj laži, kao što je to bila i čitava priča oko nezavisnog Kosova. Posle 1945. godine, Rajh ostvaruje svoju viziju „na duge staze“. Podsećajući se da je Rim prigrlio svetost za katolika (nacističkog saradnika) Alojzija Stepinca, savršeno je razjašnjeno da slovenskom pravoslavlju nije mesto u ovoj „viziji“.

Da je postojala i najmanja namera da se očuva integritet srpskog pravoslavlja u mahinacijama zapadne Evrope na Balkanu, Vučić bi predložio, Brnabić bi pokrenula, a Evropska unija bi odobrila eksklavu srpske teritorije u onom preostalom delu Metohije koju većinski naseljavaju Srbi. Imalo bi više stanovništva nego neke države Ujedinjenih nacija, pre svega azerbejdžanska eksklava Autonomna Republika Nahčivan. Ali, ne, ovo nije tema razgovora, namera je da na Balkanu slovensko pravoslavlje bude ugušeno i izumre (zamenjeno katoličanstvom „istočnog obreda“).

Populizam, i srodni nacionalizam, manifestuju se u dva oblika, zdravom i nezdravom, dobronamernom i zlonamernom, mirnom i gnevnom. EU, NATO i da, Rimska crkva, svi su umešali svoje prste u podsticanje nezdravog, zlonamernog i gnevnog. Epilog ovoga bio bi pretvaranje Srbije u „naprednu“ evropsku monokulturu na nišanu.

„Nema ni najmanjeg razloga poistovetiti nacionalizam, što je želja naroda da bude ono što jeste, sa imperijalizmom, što je želja naroda da spreči druge narode da budu ono što jesu“ – Siseli Izabel Ferfild

[1] https://archive.li/PQ0iP

*

Srbija

*

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Tags , , ,
Categories Uncategorized

Vilijam Berns – Direktor CIA-e

February 5, 2021 //
0

Read in English

Postoji sjajan članak o Obama-esknoj „nadi“ u vezi sa nominacijom Vilijama „Bila“ Bernsa za direktora nove administracije CIA-e. Članak je verodostojan/neverovatan, a ishod ostaje da se vidi.

Napisao ga je indijski diplomata, M K Bhadrakumar, i uzima jedan zanimljiv citat iz Bernsove knjige „Iza kulisa: Memoari američke diplomatije i slučaj njene obnove“ u kontekstu manje „militarizacije“ gde Berns potvrđuje da bi američka diplomatija trebalo da:

„… upregne sve alate američke državnosti – od meke moći ideja, kulture, i javne diplomatije, do…sakupljanja obaveštajnih podataka i tajnih akcija.“

Takođe, Bhadrakumar primećuje:

„Berns je naširoko hvaljen kao titan u svetu spoljne politike, a takođe pripada onoj vrsti diplomata koji veruju da su diplomatija i špijunaža dve strane iste medalje.“

Pretpostavlja se da članak i citati manje-više isključuju paravojne operacije CIA-e (npr. Sirija) kao pravac koji treba naglasiti u Bernsovoj filozofiji, kao novog Direktora Centralne obaveštajne agencije.

Ali, postoji još jedna stvar, u slučaju kada Berns vidi diplomatiju i špijunažu kao „dve strane iste medalje“, a zapravo, istorijski gledano, CIA i Stejt department Sjedinjenih Američkih Država su više nalik na „sijamske blizance“. Ovaj drugi je kvalifikovani entitet koji stvari vidi malo drugačije nego dve strane iste medalje (javni nastup naspram čina zabadanja noža u leđa) u slučaju sijamskih blizanaca ili više nego jednog kognitivnog procesa koji gura ili inicira predmetnu politiku. Ovo je više nego tipična „diplomatska“ medalja sa dva lica, u slučaju kada leva ruka ne zna šta smera desna ruka.

Naravno, kao i uvek, činjenično nasleđe koje Burns ostavlja iza sebe biće ono što će odrediti šta će biti i šta je propalo. U tom smislu, trebalo bi da se malo (samo malo) ispita Bernsova prošlost, postavi pitanje i predloži lakmus test.

Moje sećanje na Bila Bernsa u vezi sa Iranom je malo drugačije od današnjih komentara; u stvari, Berns je bio u situaciji da radi sa nekima od najgadnijih „diplomatskih“ ličnosti SAD-a, a saučesništvo, npr. sa ubicom ili ubistvenom Kondolizom Rajs, je „samo dezertiranje“ u političkoj igri.

To što je Berns verovatno dobar izveštač činjenica nije čvrst pokazatelj da će njegovo filozofsko gledište biti od bilo kakvog značaja.

Postavlja se pitanje, koliko će kontrole nad stvarnom funkcijom CIA-e Berns zaista posedovati (ili čak i mariti da je poseduje). Biće pritiskan odozgo i odozdo da sprovodi kriminalnu politiku, i odobrava kriminalne radnje. Njegovi pretpostavljeni su nekompetentni političari ogrezli u agresivnim geopolitičkim lažima i pohlepi, npr. „Rusi su to učinili“, bez obzira da li i kada Rusi to nisu učinili, i u prljavoj korporativnoj korupciji ili praktično neograničeni „Ujedinjeni Građani“ nisu objavili PAC-ov novac, a njegovi podanici (viši CIA-ni operativci), su iskreno govoreći, taktički i socijalno glupi, ne samo očigledno izdajnički, međunarodni kriminalci.

Lakmus test: kada sadašnji i dvojica prethodnih direktora FBI (Miler, Koumi i Rej), svi do jednog, štite plaćenog ubicu (serijskog ubicu) narko kartela, tj. Enrikea „Rikija“ Prada, zbog činjenice da je Prado imao dvojnu ulogu kao visoko pozicionirani operativac CIA-e, da li Berns prestaje da štiti Prada, dozvoljavajući da se nastavi progon, ili Berns smatra da je zaštita Prada onaj deo „tajne akcije“ koji je legitimno „državništvo“?

Zapravo, vreme je da neko počisti CIA-na dela. Da li će to učiniti Berns ili će uopšte vršiti kontrolu nad agencijom koja štiti brojne ubice, ne samo Prada? Da li prestaje i odriče se vansudskog „Spiska za pogubljenje“ iz doba Obama-Brenan koji ima na nišanu američke državljane, i uznemiravanja, sabotiranja privatnih života, smeštanjem Amerikancima disidentima koji žive u inostranstvu (oprana, CIA-ina verzija FBI-vog COINTELPRO-a) ili ovi mafijaški „quid pro quo“ programi vide novi život „udahnut“ u njih?

Ova meta (iskreno vaš) želi da zna. Jer od ove nedelje, u Srbiji, postalo je jasno da „psi nisu opozvani“.

Ali, možda je već trebalo da znam. Kontrapunkt analiza, koju bi trebalo pročitati, tiče se Bernsovog „Pozadinskog kanala“, opisuje čoveka nesposobnog da shvati svoje neuspehe. Odlomak Džona Helmera:

„Vilijam Berns je čovek koji je mogao biti državni sekretar Sjedinjenih Američkih Država da je Hilari Klinton bila izabrana za predsednika u novembru 2016. godine. Od tada on sastavlja apologia pro vita sua – knjigu verskih uverenja, koja opisuje šta je pošlo po zlu, ne zbog njegove ili Božije krivice, objašnjavajući kakva su Berns i Sjedinjene Države žrtva loše sreće; lošeg tajminga; „narcizma“, „hirovitog vođstva“ i „aktivne sabotaže“ Predsednika Donalda Trampa; i ruske zlonamernosti.

Za bivšeg ambasadora u Rusiji i bivšeg zamenika državnog sekretara, rusko zlo je bez motiva, psihopatološki zločin. Rusi, naročito nekolicina visoko-rangiranih koje je Berns upoznao kao apartčik Stejt departmenta, ne mogu sebi pomoći. Ne postoji uzrok i posledica između akcije i reakcije, između napada Sjedinjenih Država i odbrane Rusije. Ništa što su učinili Hrišćanska braća alumni i Amerikanci misionari, kao što je Berns, ne objašnjava (u Bernsovom traktatu) zašto se Rusi ponašaju tako rđavo, i zašto njihove duše moraju zauvek goreti u paklu ukoliko se ne pokaju. Pet stotina strana svetijeg-od-tebe, ispovednika pokvarenih Rusa – to je Bernsova misija.“

 

[1] https://archive.li/zsNyv

[2] https://archive.li/LTrhx

[3] https://archive.li/Wxt3x

[4] https://archive.li/tub2k

[5] https://archive.li/V8wJ3

[6] https://archive.li/yBeG2

[7] https://archive.li/1lIpv

[8] https://archive.li/LHS2R

 

Serbia/Srbija

 

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Tags , ,
Categories Uncategorized

Pitanje za dvorsku ludu

January 30, 2021 //
0

Read in English | Читать по русски

Kralj se okreće svom veziru i postavlja pitanje:

„Evropska Liga predlaže da se pridružimo njihovom ekonomskom savezu i prisvojimo njihov novac. Koje su koristi u odnosu na štetu?“

Vezir, špijun Evropske Lige, promeškolji se, svakako ne može slobodno da govori. Da bi izbegao pitanje, reče:

„Hajde da pitamo dvorsku ludu.“

Dvorska luda:

„Kraljev korumpirani računovođa podiže iznos sa 2.000 na 3.000 i to zove povećanjem od 50%. Zatim, ta ista osoba deli iznos od 3.000 na pola i dolazi do 1.500 i to naziva smanjenjem od 50%.

Ali broj uvećan za 50% može se smanjiti za 33,33% da bi se došlo do 2.000? Odjednom, poput magije, 500 nestade? Gde je nestalo?

Povećanje od 50% se ne može preokrenuti i bez prevare biti jednako smanjenju od 50% u ovom problemu, nimalo drugačije od promene metoda gde je smanjenje 3.000 za 50% jednako 1.500, a povećanje 1.500 za 50% je jednako 2.250; pri čemu, za postizanje stvarnog podudaranja procenata i da se odagna laž iz brojeva, bilo bi potrebno da povećanje 1.500 za 50% iznosi 1.500, jer suma od 1.500 postaje tačno 50% od 3.000.

Ne bi li bio pošteniji pristup da se radi samo sa krajnjim iznosima (stvarnim rezultatima), gde bi 2.000 jedino moglo postati 3.000 povećanjem za 33,33% i tako od onoga što je bilo 2.000 da postane 3.000? U ovom slučaju smanjenje za 50% može zapravo iznositi 1.500 bez laži.

Ako zaista, u praktičnoj primeni, 50% treba da nas dovede do 3.000 od 1.500, ali 50% je označeno kao 750, stiže se do 2.250, u čiji džep nestade drugih 750? Da li je ovo samo problem semantike? Ili „Transcendentna korupcija“ računovodstvene matematike Evropske Lige radi na način sličan metodi koju ovaj problem identifikuje kada, na primer, čine da odobreni „iznos njihove valute u opticaju“ raste i opada ili da se javni novci njihovih poreza pojavljuju i nestaju? Čini se da „dodeljivanje procentualnih vrednosti“ u matematici Evropske lige omogućava da je gotovo svaka prevara predstavljena Kralju i njegovim ljudima, de facto, kao „fait accompli“ u „dobroj veri“, bez obzira na iznos kojim se raspolaže!“

Kralj:

„Ko može ovo posvedočiti?!“

Dvorska luda:

„Pa, to mogu špijuni Evropske Lige, Vaše Veličanstvo, jer kako vrlo jasno navode u Vašem odricanju odgovornosti u mnogim izveštajima:

„Prosuđivanje nema za cilj da implicira da imamo dokaz koji pokazuje da je nešto činjenica. Procene se zasnivaju na … informacijama koje su često nepotpune ili delimične, kao i na logici, argumentaciji i presedanima““

Kralj:

Okreće se prema veziru sa ubilačkim izrazom lica…

*

Ilustracija: Rend Pol, ovaj, mislim Deni Kej u filmu „Dvorska luda“ (Paramount)

Serbia/Srbija

© 2021 Ronald Tomas Vest (Ronald Thomas West)

 

Bivši narednik za operativne i obaveštajne poslove specijalnih snaga, Ronald Tomas Vest penzionisani je istražitelj (živi u egzilu), čiji je rad bio fokusiran na korupciju. Ronald je živeo više od trideset godina u bliskoj saradnji sa Indijancima Blekfit (onima koji još uvek govore njihov jezik), a u međunarodnom pravu objavljen je kao laik: Pravo samoopredeljenja naroda i njegova primena na starosedelačke narode u SAD ili Miler-Vilsonova reportaža, u koautorstvu sa dr Markom D. Kolom. Ronald je bio vanredni profesor američkog ustavnog prava na Univerzitetu Johan Gutenberg, Majnc, Nemačka (na engleskom jeziku, letnji semestar 2008.). Ronaldovo formalno obrazovanje (bez diplome) je socijalna psihologija. Njegovo terapeutsko sredstvo je satira.

Tags , ,
Categories Uncategorized
« Older Entries
Newer Entries »